Ground reaction forces and muscle activity while walking on sand versus stable ground in individuals with pronated feet compared with healthy controls

English version

Autoři: AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero ^aff001; Amir Fatollahi ^aff001; Nasrin Amirzadeh ^aff001; Marefat Siahkouhian ^aff001; Urs Granacher ^aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran ^aff001; Division of Training and Movement Sciences, Research Focus Cognition Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany ^aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223219

Souhrn

Background

Sand is an easy-to-access, cost-free resource that can be used to treat pronated feet (PF). Therefore, the aims of this study were to contrast the effects of walking on stable ground versus walking on sand on ground reaction forces (GRFs) and electromyographic (EMG) activity of selected lower limb muscles in PF individuals compared with healthy controls.

Methods

Twenty-nine controls aged 22.2±2.5 years and 30 PF individuals aged 22.2±1.9 years were enrolled in this study. Participants walked at preferred speed and in randomized order over level ground and sand. A force plate was included in the walkway to collect GRFs. Muscle activities were recorded using EMG system.

Results

No statistically significant between-group differences were found in preferred walking speed when walking on stable ground (PF: 1.33±0.12 m/s; controls: 1.35±0.14 m/s; p = 0.575; d = 0.15) and sand (PF: 1.19±0.11 m/s; controls: 1.23±0.18 m/s; p = 0.416; d = 0.27). Irrespective of the group, walking on sand (1.21±0.15 m/s) resulted in significantly lower gait speed compared with stable ground walking (1.34±0.13 m/s) (p<0.001; d = 0.93). Significant main effects of “surface” were found for peak posterior GRFs at heel contact, time to peak for peak lateral GRFs at heel contact, and peak anterior GRFs during push-off (p<0.044; d = 0.27–0.94). Pair-wise comparisons revealed significantly smaller peak posterior GRFs at heel contact (p = 0.005; d = 1.17), smaller peak anterior GRFs during push-off (p = 0.001; d = 1.14), and time to peak for peak lateral GRFs (p = 0.044; d = 0.28) when walking on sand. No significant main effects of “group” were observed for peak GRFs and their time to peak (p>0.05; d = 0.06–1.60). We could not find any significant group by surface interactions for peak GRFs and their time to peak. Significant main effects of “surface” were detected for anterior-posterior impulse and peak positive free moment amplitude (p<0.048; d = 0.54–0.71). Pair-wise comparisons revealed a significantly larger peak positive free moment amplitude (p = 0.010; d = 0.71) and a lower anterior-posterior impulse (p = 0.048; d = 0.38) when walking on sand. We observed significant main effects of “group” for the variable loading rate (p<0.030; d = 0.59). Pair-wise comparisons revealed significantly lower loading rates in PF compared with controls (p = 0.030; d = 0.61). Significant group by surface interactions were observed for the parameter peak positive free moment amplitude (p<0.030; d = 0.59). PF individuals exhibited a significantly lower peak positive free moment amplitude (p = 0.030, d = 0.41) when walking on sand. With regards to EMG, no significant main effects of “surface”, main effects of “group”, and group by surface interactions were observed for the recorded muscles during the loading and push-off phases (p>0.05; d = 0.00–0.53).

Conclusions

The observed lower velocities during walking on sand compared with stable ground were accompanied by lower peak positive free moments during the push-off phase and loading rates during the loading phase. Our findings of similar lower limb muscle activities during walking on sand compared with stable ground in PF together with lower free moment amplitudes, vertical loading rates, and lower walking velocities on sand may indicate more relative muscle activity on sand compared with stable ground. This needs to be verified in future studies.

Klíčová slova:

Body limbs – Electromyography – Feet – Hip – Knees – Musculoskeletal mechanics – Walking – Gastrocnemius muscles

Zdroje

1. Chen K-C, Tung L-C, Tung C-H, Yeh C-J, Yang J-F, Wang C-H. An investigation of the factors affecting flatfoot in children with delayed motor development. Res Dev Disabil. 2014; 35(3): 639–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.012 24444612

2. Dunn J, Link C, Felson D, Crincoli M, Keysor J, McKinlay J. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159(5): 491–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh071 14977645

3. Kothari A, Dixon P, Stebbins J, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. The relationship between quality of life and foot function in children with flexible flatfeet. Gait Posture. 2015; 41(3): 786–90. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.02.012 25771182

4. Lin C-J, Lai K-A, Kuan T-S, Chou Y-L. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001; 21(3): 378–82. 11371824

5. Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, Sato M, Baba H, Shimada S. Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002; 61(7): 617–22. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.7.617 12079903

6. Betsch M, Schneppendahl J, Dor L, Jungbluth P, Grassmann JP, Windolf J, et al. Influence of foot positions on the spine and pelvis. Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63(12): 1758–65.

7. Bird AR, Bendrups AP, Payne CB. The effect of foot wedging on electromyographic activity in the erector spinae and gluteus medius muscles during walking. Gait Posture. 2003; 18(2): 81–91. 14654211

8. Kothari A, Dixon P, Stebbins J, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. Are flexible flat feet associated with proximal joint problems in children? Gait Posture. 2016; 45: 204–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.02.008 26979907

9. Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Mall NA, Queen RM. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(3): 405–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.012 18337103

10. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. J Biomech. 2016; 49(9): 1705–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.056 27086117

11. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19(4): 391–7.

12. Duval K, Lam T, Sanderson D. The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back. Gait Posture. 2010; 32(4): 637–40. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.007 20889344

13. Tateuchi H, Wada O, Ichihashi N. Effects of calcaneal eversion on three-dimensional kinematics of the hip, pelvis and thorax in unilateral weight bearing. Hum Mov Sci. 2011; 30(3): 566–73. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.011 21459469

14. Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Bird AR. Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009; 29(2): 172–87. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.015 18922696

15. Gray EG, Basmajian JV. Electromyography and cinematography of leg and foot (“normal” and flat) during walking. Anat Rec. 1968; 161(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091610101 5664082

16. Ashnagar Z, Hadian M-R, Olyaei G, Talebian S, Rezasoltani A, Saeedi H, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the quadriceps muscles in pronated foot posture. The Foot. 2019; 38: 86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2019.01.003 30849669

17. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhadgero A, Allard P, Majlesi M. Muscle activity and kinetics of lower limbs during walking in pronated feet individuals with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018; 39: 35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.01.006 29413451

18. Williams DS Iii, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech. 2001; 16(4): 341–7.

19. Headlee DL, Leonard JL, Hart JM, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008; 18(3): 420–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.11.004 17208458

20. O’connor KM, Hamill J. The role of selected extrinsic foot muscles during running. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19(1): 71–7.

21. Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chon J, Peters J. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995(316): 165–72. 7634700

22. Fiolkowski P, Brunt D, Bishop M, Woo R, Horodyski M. Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: an electromyography study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003; 42(6): 327–33. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2003.10.003 14688773

23. Keenan M, Peabody T, Gronley J, Perry J. Valgus deformities of the feet and characteristics of gait in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(2): 237–47. 1993719

24. Kulig K, Reischl SF, Pomrantz AB, Burnfield JM, Mais-Requejo S, Thordarson DB, et al. Nonsurgical management of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction with orthoses and resistive exercise: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(1): 26–37. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070242 19022863

25. van den Berg ME, Barr CJ, McLoughlin JV, Crotty M. Effect of walking on sand on gait kinematics in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017; 16: 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.05.008 28755679

26. Eslami M, Begon M, Hinse S, Sadeghi H, Popov P, Allard P. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running. J Sci Med Sport. 2009; 12(6): 679–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.05.001 18768360

27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: erlbaum; 1988.

28. Cote KP, Brunet ME, II BMG, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005; 40(1): 41–6. 15902323

29. Yoo B. The effect of carrying a military backpack on a transverse slope and sand surface on lower limb during gait: The University of Utah; 2014.

30. Kim S. Ergonomic analysis of army backpack designs: back and shoulder stresses and their implications: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah; 2014.

31. Wade C, Redfern MS, Andres RO, Breloff SP. Joint kinetics and muscle activity while walking on ballast. Hum Factors. 2010; 52(5): 560–73. doi: 10.1177/0018720810381996 21186736

32. Merryweather AS. Lower limb biomechanics of walking on slanted and level railroad ballast. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah. 2008.

33. Jafarnezhadgero AA, Oliveira AS, Mousavi SH, Madadi-Shad M. Combining valgus knee brace and lateral foot wedges reduces external forces and moments in osteoarthritis patients. Gait Posture. 2018; 59: 104–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.040 29028621

34. Xu H, Wang Y, Greenland K, Bloswick D, Merryweather A. The influence of deformation height on estimating the center of pressure during level and cross-slope walking on sand. Gait Posture. 2015; 42(2): 110–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.04.015 25975215

35. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, et al. European recommendations for surface electromyography. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999; 8(2): 13–54.

36. Murley GS, Buldt AK, Trump PJ, Wickham JB. Tibialis posterior EMG activity during barefoot walking in people with neutral foot posture. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009: 19(2): e69–e77. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.10.002 18053742

37. Hennig EM, Lafortune MA. Relationships between ground reaction force and tibial bone acceleration parameters. Int J Biomech. 1991; 7(3): 303–9.

38. Radin EL, Ehrlich MG, Chernack R, Abernethy P, Paul IL, Rose RMJCO, et al. Effect of repetitive impulsive loading on the knee joints of rabbits. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978(131): 288–93. 657637

39. Mann RA, Hagy J. Biomechanics of walking, running, and sprinting. Am J Sports Med. 1980; 8(5): 345–50. doi: 10.1177/036354658000800510 7416353

40. Nilsson J, Thorstensson A, Halbertsma J. Changes in leg movements and muscle activity with speed of locomotion and mode of progression in humans. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1985; 123(4): 457–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1985.tb07612.x 3993402

41. Mann RA, Moran GT, Dougherty S. Comparative electromyography of the lower extremity in jogging, running, and sprinting. Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14(6): 501–10. doi: 10.1177/036354658601400614 3799879

42. Cavanagh PR. Biomechanics of Distance Running: ERIC; 1990.

43. Novacheck T. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture. 1998; 7(1): 77–95. 10200378

44. Pinnington HC, Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Dawson B. Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 94(3): 242–253 doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1323-6 15815938

45. Polcyn AF, Bensel CK, Harman EA, Obusek JP, Pandorf C. Effects of weight carried by soldiers: Combined analysis of four studies on maximal performance, physiology, and biomechanics. Army natick soldier center ma supporting science and technology directorate. 2002.

46. Honeine J-L, Schieppati M, Gagey O. The functional role of the triceps surae muscle during human locomotion. PloS one. 2013; 8(1): e52943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052943 23341916

47. Bird A, Payne C. Foot function and low back pain. The Foot. 1999; 9(4): 175–80.

48. Semciw AI, Pizzari T, Murley GS, Green RA. Gluteus medius: an intramuscular EMG investigation of anterior, middle and posterior segments during gait. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23(4): 858–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.03.007 23587766

49. Bellchamber T, van den Bogert AJ. Contributions of proximal and distal moments to axial tibial rotation during walking and running. J Biomech. 2000; 33(11): 1397–403. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00113-5 10940398

50. Chuter VH, de Jonge XA. Proximal and distal contributions to lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Gait Posture. 2012; 36(1): 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.001 22440758

51. Khodaveisi H, Sadeghi H, Memar R, Anbarian M. Comparison of selected muscular activity of trunk and lower extremities in young women's walking on supinated, pronated and normal foot. Apunts Med Esport. 2016; 51(189): 13–9.

52. Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A, Trost JP. The effect of walking speed on the gait of typically developing children. J Biomech. 2008; 41(8): 1639–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.015 18466909

Ground reaction forces and muscle activity while walking on sand versus stable ground in individuals with pronated feet compared with healthy controls

Souhrn

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

INSIGHTS from European Respiratory Congress

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií