Anger while driving in Mexico City
Autoři:
Ana María Hernández-Hernández aff001; Jesús M. Siqueiros-García aff001; Eduardo Robles-Belmont aff001; Carlos Gershenson aff001
Působiště autorů:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Distrito Federal, México
aff001; Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Distrito Federal, México
aff002; ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia Federation
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223048
Souhrn
This study aims to analyze the level of anger developed by drivers in Mexico City and also understand the behavior that those drivers use to express that anger, using four different survey methods. The first focuses on personal information, the second Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX), the third refers to a shorten version of Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and the fourth being the Dula Dangerous Driving Index (DDDI). These have previously been applied and validated in several different countries. The questionnaires were filled out online by 626 drivers. Using the data collected through the online platform, it was possible to identify the kind of reactions volunteers displayed while driving. Also, it was possible to identify that people in Mexico City developed anger depending on their driving area. Our analyses shows that in the Adaptive/Constructive Expression subscale, males and females show a significant difference in their mean score, with women express their anger in a more constructive way than males.
Klíčová slova:
Aggression – Behavior – Emotions – Geoinformatics – Mexico – Neighborhoods – Traffic safety – Transportation
Zdroje
1. Yinon Y, Levian M. Presence of Other Drivers as a Determinant of Traffic Violations. J Soc Psychol. 1995;135(3):299–304. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1995.9713959
2. Ottosson C, Pettersson H, Johansson S, Nyrén O, Ponzer S. Recovery after Minor Traffic Injuries:A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS A Clin randomized Trials. 2007;2(3):0001–0008.
3. Feng S, Gu G, Dai S. Effects of Traffic Lights on CA Traffic Model. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 1997;2(2):70–74.
4. Clapp J, Olsen S, Beck J, Palyo S, Grant D, Gudmundsdottir B, et al. The Driving Behavior Survey: Scale Construction and validation. J Anxiety Disord. 2011;25(1):96–105. 20832988
5. Corbetta A, Lee C, Benzi R, Muntean A, Toschi F. Fluctuations around mean walking behaviors in diluted pedestrian flows. Phys Rev E. 2017;95(032316):1–9.
6. Olmos L, Muños J. Traffic gridlock on a honeycomb city. Phys Rev E. 2017;95(032320):1–5.
7. Guzmán H, Lárraga M, Alvarez-Icaza L. A Two Lanes Cellular Automata Model for Traffic Flow Considering Realistic Driving Decisions. J Cell Autom. 2015;10:65–93.
8. Cortés-Berrueco L, Gershenson C, Stephens C. Traffic Games: Modeling Freeway Traffic with Game Theory. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0165381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165381 27855176
9. Xu Y. Previous Research Analysis of the Traffic Network Study. Energy Procedia. 2012;16:81–85.
10. Tian Z, Jia L, Dong H, Su F, Zhang Z. Analysis of Urban Road Traffic Network Based on Complex Network. Precedia Engineering. 2016;137:537–546. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.290
11. Liu G, Gao P, Li Y. Transport Capacity Limit of Urban Street Networks. Trans GIS. 2017;21(3). doi: 10.1111/tgis.12218
12. Batty M. Visualizing aggregate movement in cities. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2018;373:1–11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0236
13. Qin J, He Y, Ni L. Quantitative Efficiency Evaluation Method for Transportation Networks. Sustainability. 2014;6:8364–8378. doi: 10.3390/su6128364
14. Zou L, Dai H, Yao E, Jiang T, Guo H. Research on Assessment Methods for Urban Public Transport Development in China. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2014;941347:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/941347
15. Kujala R, Weckströ C, Darst R, Mladenović M, Saramäki J. Data Descriptor: A collection of public transport network data sets for 25 cities. Scientific Data. 2018;5(180089):1–14.
16. Gershenson C. Self-Organization Leads to Supraoptimal Performance in Public Transportation Systems. PLoSONE. 2011;6(6):e21469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021469
17. Cortés-Barrueco L, Gershenson C, CR S. Self-Organization Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation with Cultural Propagation In: Elmenreich W., Dressler F., Loreto V. (eds). Self-Organizing Systems IWSOS 2013 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2014;8221:145–150.
18. Deffenbacher J, Oetting E, Lynch R. Development of a driving anger scale. Psychol Rep. 1994;74(1):83–91. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.83 8153239
19. Deffenbacher J, Stephens A, MJM S. Driving anger as a psychological construct: Twenty years of research using the Driving Anger Scale. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;42:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.021
20. Mina S, Verma R, Balhara Y, Ul-Hasan S. Road Rage: Prevalence Pattern and Web Based Survey Feasibility. Psychiatry J. 2014;897493:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2014/897493
21. Li F, Yao X, Jiang L, Li Y. Driving anger in China: Psychometric properties of the Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and its relationship with aggressive driving. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;68:130–135. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.018
22. Sullman M, Gras M, Cunill M, Planes M, Font-Mayolas S. Driving anger in Spain. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42:701–713. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.014
23. Sullman M, Stephens A, Yong M. Driving anger in Malaysia. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;71:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.019 24863369
24. McLinton S, Dollard M. Work stress and driving anger in Japan. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.016 19887158
25. Sullman M, Stephens A. A comparison of the Driving Anger Scale and the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;58:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.002 23727549
26. Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Hameed S. Pedestrian Injury and Human Behavior: Observing Road-Rule Violations at High-Incident Intersections. PLoSONE. 2011;6(6):e21063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021063
27. Winters M, Branion-Calles M, Therrien S, Fuller D, Gauvin L, Whitehurst D, et al. Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–11. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130
28. Stewart A, St Peter C. Driving and riding avoidance following motor vehicle crashes in a non-clinical sample: psychometric properties of a new measure. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42:859–879. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00203-1 15178463
29. Feng Z, Yang M, Ma C, Jiang K, Lei Y, Huang W, et al. Driving anger and its relationship with type A behavior patterns and trait anger: Differences between professional and non-professional drivers. PLoSONE. 2017;12:e0189793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189793
30. Dula C, Ballard M. Development and Evaluation of a Measure of Dangerous, Aggressive, Negative Emotional and Risky Driving. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33(2):263–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01896.x
31. Gras ME, Font-Mayolas S, Patiño J, Baltasar A, Planes M, Sullman M. Resilience and the expression of driving anger. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;42:302–316. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.09.005
32. Deffenbacher J, Lynch R, Oetting E, Swaim R. The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: a measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40:717–737. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00063-8 12051489
33. Ehlers A, Taylor J, Ehring T, Hofmann S, Deane F, Roth W, et al. The Driving Congnitions Questionnaire: Development and preliminary psychometric properties. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21:493–509. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.08.002 16982173
34. Willemsen J, Dula CS, D F, Verhaeghe P. The Dula Dangerous Driving Index: An Investigation of Reliability and Validity across Cultures. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(2):798–806. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.019 18329435
35. Dahlen E, Ragan K. Validation of the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale. J Safety Res. 2004;35:557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.09.002 15530929
36. Sullman M, Stephens A, Yong M. Anger, aggression and road rage behavior in Malaysian drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2015;29:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.006
37. Deffenbacher J, Kemper C, Richards T. The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A Validity Study with Community College Student Drivers. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29:220–230. doi: 10.1007/s10862-007-9049-x
38. Deffenbacher J, Lynch R, Deffenbacher D, Oetting E. Further evidence of reliability and validity for the Driving Anger Expression Inventory. Psychol Rep. 2001;89:535–540. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.3.535 11824713
39. Ge Y, Qu W, Jiang C, Du F, Sun X, Zhang K. The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;73:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.024 25171523
40. Sârbescu P. Aggressive driving in Romania: Psychometric properties of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2012;15:556–564. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.009
41. Dorantes-Argandar G. Validation of an Aggressive Driving Behaviors in Traffic Inventory. Revista Internacional de Psicología. 2018;16:1–57.
42. Dorantes-Argandar G, Ferrero-Berlanga J. Impulsivity and Aggressive Driving as Mediators between Self-Esteem and Strees in Mexican Drivers. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science. 2016;4:131–141. doi: 10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a12
43. Alcázar-Olán R, Deffenbacher JL, Reyes-Pérez V, Hernández-Guzmán L, Casas-Henaine G. Validity of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX) in a Mexican Sample. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2018;23:81–88.
44. Montoro L, Useche S, Alonso F, Cendales B. Work Environment, Stress, and Driving Anger: A Structural Equation Model for Predicting Traffic Sanctions of Public Transport Drivers. Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15:1–12.
45. Dorantes-Argandar G, Tortosa-Gil F, Ferrero-Berlanga J. Measuring situations that stress Mexicans while driving. Transportation Research Part F. 2016;37:154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.12.014
46. Sullman M, Stephens A, Kuzu D. The expression of anger amongst Turkish taxi drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;56:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.013 23584538
47. Beck K, Daughters SB, Ali B. Hurried driving: Relationship to distress tolerance, driver anger, aggressive and risky driving in college students. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;51:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.012 23182783
48. Sullman M. Anger amongst New Zealand drivers. Transportation Research Part F. 2006;9:173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.10.003
49. Sullman M, Paxion J, AN S. Gender roles, sex and the expression of driving anger. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;106:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.016 28550751
50. Jovanović D, Lipovac K, Stanojević P, D S. The effects of personality traits on driving-related anger and aggressive behaviour in traffic among Serbian drivers. Transportation Research Part F. 2011;14:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2010.09.005
51. Eşiyok B, Yasak Y, Korkusuz I. Anger Expression on the Road: Validity and Reliability of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;18:1–12.
52. Deffenbacher J, White G, Lynch R. Evaluation of Two New Scales Assessing Driving Anger: The Driving Anger Expression Inventory and the Driver’s Angry Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2004;26:87–99. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013656.68429.69
53. Herrero-Fernández D. Psychometric adaptation of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory in a Spanish sample: Differences by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F. 2011;14:324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.03.001
54. Lajunen T, Parker D, Stradling S. Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F. 1998;1:107–121. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00009-6
55. Jovanović D, Stanojević P, Stanojević D. Motives for, and Attitudes about, Driving-Related Anger and Aggressive Driving. Social behavior and personality. 2011;39:755–764. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2011.39.6.755
56. Shen B, Qu W, Ge Y, Sun X, Zhang K. The relationship between personalities and self-report positive driving behavior in a Chinese sample. PLosONE. 2018; 13(1):e0190746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190746
57. Brandenburg S, Oehl M, Seigies K. German taxi drivers’ experiences and expressions of driving anger: Are the driving anger scale and the driving anger expression inventory valid measures? Traffic Injury Prevention. 2017;18(8):807–812. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1316493 28524731
58. Öz B, Özkan T, Lajunen T. Professional and non-professional drivers’ stress reactions and risky driving. Transportation Research Part F 1. 2010;13:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2009.10.001
59. Escanés G, Martín Poó F. Driving Anger in Argentina. Safety Science. 2018;105:228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.019
60. Available from: http://inrix.com/scorecard/.
61. Available from: https://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/trafficindex/.
62. Available from: http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/df/poblacion/default.aspx?tema=me&e=09.
63. Available from: http://www.fimevic.df.gob.mx/problemas/1diagnostico.htm#parque.
64. Available from: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/temas/vehiculos/.
65. Hamburg M. Basic statistics: a modern approach / Morrin Hamburg. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1985.
66. Available from: https://github.com/gboeing/osmnx-examples/blob/master/LICENSE.txt.
67. Available from: https://networkx.github.io/documentation/networkx-1.10/reference/legal.html.
68. Boeing G. OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2017;65:126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
69. Hagberg A, Schults D, Swart P. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX; 2008. p. 11–15.
70. Hinton P. Statistics explained. Taylor and Francis group; 2004.
71. Available from: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/debian/copyright.
72. Available from: http://data.evalua.cdmx.gob.mx/files/indice/ids_evalua_2015.pdf.
73. Available from: https://datos.cdmx.gob.mx/explore/dataset/reportes-de-siniestros-viales-c5/custom/.
74. Available from: https://datos.cdmx.gob.mx/explore/dataset/incidentes-viales-c5/table/.
75. Jc N. An Overview of Psychological Measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: A Handbook. Springer; 1978.
76. Villieux A, Delhomme P. Driving Anger and its expression: Further evidence of validity and reliability for the Driving Anger Expression Inventory French adaptation. J Safety Res. 2010;41(5):417–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.08.003 21059459
77. Yasak Y, Esiyok B. Anger amongst Turkish drivers: Driving Anger Scale and its adapted, long and short version. Saf Sci. 2009;47:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.02.003
78. Deffenbacher J, Filetti L, TL R, Lynch R, Oetting E. Characteristics of two groups of angry drivers. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2003;50:123–132. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.123
79. Fernandez E, Malley-Morrison K. Gender-Inclusive and Gender-Informed Treatment of Anger. In: Treatments for anger in specific populations: Theory, application, and outcome. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 213–235.
80. Carlozzi B, Winterowd C, Harrist R, Thomason N, Bratkovich K, Worth S. Spirituality, anger, and stress in early adolescents. Journal of Religious Health. 2010;49:445–459. doi: 10.1007/s10943-009-9295-1
81. Crowne D, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1960;24:349–354. doi: 10.1037/h0047358 13813058
82. Fernandez E, Scott S. Anger treatment in chemically-dependent inpatients:Evaluation of phase effects and gender. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2009;37:431–447. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990075 19545479
83. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology. 2004;8:291–322. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
84. Henessy D, Wiesenthal D, Wickens C, Lustman M. 9. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2004. p. 157–174.
85. Møller M, Hausten S. Road anger expression—Changes over time and attributed reasons. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2018;119:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.013
86. Phillips L, Henry J, Hosie J, Milne A. Age, anger regulation and well-being. Aging & Mental Health,. 2005;10(3):250–256. doi: 10.1080/13607860500310385
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 9
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Nová metoda odlišení nádorové tkáně může zpřesnit resekci glioblastomů
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Graviola (Annona muricata) attenuates behavioural alterations and testicular oxidative stress induced by streptozotocin in diabetic rats
- CH(II), a cerebroprotein hydrolysate, exhibits potential neuro-protective effect on Alzheimer’s disease
- Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections
- Assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity using CareStart G6PD rapid diagnostic test and associated genetic variants in Plasmodium vivax malaria endemic setting in Mauritania
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy