#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Dolutegravir based antiretroviral therapy compared to other combined antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV-infected naive patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Autoři: Mario Cruciani aff001;  Saverio G. Parisi aff002
Působiště autorů: Infectious Diseases Unit, AULSS 9 scaligera-Verona, Verona, Italy aff001;  Department of Biotechnology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222229

Souhrn

Background

Numerous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate dolutegravir based triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) compared to other triple antiretroviral regimens in naïve patients, and a summary of the available evidence is required to shed more light on safety and effectiveness issues.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing dolutegravir-containing ART to non-dolutegravir containing ART in HIV-infected naive patients. Primary outcomes: % of patients with viral load<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks, stratified according to baseline viral load levels (< or >100.000 copies/mL); overall rate of discontinuation and/or switching for any cause (virologic failure, clinical failure, adverse events). Measure of treatment effect: Risk Difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The GRADE system was used to assess the certainty of the body of evidence,

Results

We included 7 RCTs (13 reports, 6407patients) comparing dolutegravir containing to non-dolutegravir containing ART, both in combination with 2 NRTIs. Controls were raltegravir or bictegravir (3 RCTs), boosted atazanavir or darunavir (2 RCTs) or efavirenz (2 RCTs). Rates of patients with VL <50 copies/ml were higher in dolutegravir recipients compared to controls at 48 weeks (RD, 0.05; 95% CIs, 0.03/0.08, p = 0.0002) and 96 weeks (RD, 0.06; 95% CIs, 0.03/0.10, p<0.0001); the average benefit of using dolutegravir was particularly evident at 48 weeks in the subgroup of patients with high baseline viral load (RD, 0.10; 95% CIs, 0.05/0.15; p< 0.0001; GRADE assessment: "high certainty of evidence"). Overall rate of discontinuation were lower in dolutegravir compared to controls (RD,-0.03, 95% CIs -0.05/-0.01; p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in rates of discontinuation due to adverse events (RD, -0.02; 95% CIs, -0.05/0.00), virologic failure (RD, -0.01; 95% CIs, -0.02/0.01), and most common adverse events (GRADE assessment: from “very-low” to “moderate certainty of evidence”)

Conclusion

Starting treatment in naive patients with dolutegravir containing ART has an increased likelihood of achieving viral suppression in the comparison with non-dolutegravir containing ART. The average benefit is particularly evident in those with high baseline viral load.

Klíčová slova:

Research and analysis methods – Research design – Clinical research design – Adverse events – Research assessment – Systematic reviews – Biology and life sciences – Vaccination and immunization – Microbiology – Medical microbiology – Microbial pathogens – Viral pathogens – Immunodeficiency viruses – HIV – HIV-1 – Retroviruses – Lentivirus – Virology – Viral transmission and infection – Viral load – Antivirals – Antiretrovirals – Microbial control – Antimicrobials – Organisms – Viruses – RNA viruses – Medicine and health sciences – Immunology – Public and occupational health – Preventive medicine – Antiviral therapy – Pathology and laboratory medicine – Pathogens – Pharmacology – Drugs – Infectious diseases – Viral diseases – HIV infections – Engineering and technology – Electronics – Comparators


Zdroje

1. Volberding PA, Deeks SG. Antiretroviral therapy and management of HIV infection. Lancet. 2010;376(9734):49–62 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60676-9 20609987

2. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.

3. Wood E, Hogg RS, Yip B, Harrigan PR, Montaner JS. Why are baseline HIV RNA levels 100,000 copies/mL or greater associated with mortality after the initiation of antiretroviral therapy? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Mar 1;38:289–95 15735446

4. Osterholzer DA, Goldman M. Dolutegravir: a next-generation integrase inhibitor for treatment of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):265–271. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu221 24723281

5. Cruciani M, Malena M. Combination dolutegravir-abacavir-lamivudine in the management of HIV/AIDS: clinical utility and patient considerations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:299–31 doi: 10.2147/PPA.S65199 25733823

6. M Llibre J, Raffi F, Moyle G, Behrens G, Bouee S, Reilly G et al. An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (5):e0155406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155406 27196332

7. Rutherford GW, Horvath H. Dolutegravir Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors versus Efavirenz Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors As Initial Antiretroviral Therapy for People with HIV: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0162775 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162775 27736859

8. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070

9. Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J Altman DTI. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 32: 557–60.

10. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.

11. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence"and why is it important to clinicians. BMJ 2008;336:995–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE 18456631

12. Orrell C, Hagins DP, Belonosova E, Porteiro N, Walmsley S, Falcó Vet al. ARIA study team. Fixed-dose combination dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in previously untreated women with HIV-1 infection (ARIA): week 48 results from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3b study. Lancet HIV. 2017; 4(12):e536–e546 doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30095-4 28729158

13. Clotet B, Feinberg J, van Lunzen J Khuong-Josses MA, Antinori A, Dumitru I et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 48 week results from the randomised open-label phase 3b study. Lancet. 2014 383(9936):2222–3 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60084-2 24698485

14. Gallant J, Lazzarin A, Mills A, Orkin C, Podzamczer D, Tebas P et al. Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1489): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017; 390(10107):2063–2072 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32299-7 28867497

15. Sax PE, Pozniak A, Montes ML, Koenig E, DeJesus E, Stellbrink HJet al. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10107):2073–2082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32340-1 28867499

16. Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, Duiculescu D, Eberhard A, Gutiérrez F et al. SINGLE Investigators. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(19):1807–18 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215541 24195548

17. van Lunzen J, Maggiolo F, Arribas JR, Rakhmanova A, Yeni P, Young B et al. Once daily dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV: planned interim 48 week results from SPRING-1, a dose-ranging, randomised, phase 2b trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012; 12(2):111–8 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70290-0 22018760

18. Raffi F, Rachlis A, Stellbrink HJ, Hardy WD, Torti C, Orkin C et al. SPRING-2 Study Group.Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study. Lancet. 2013; 381(9868):735–43 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61853-4 23306000

19. Molina JM, Clotet B, van Lunzen J, Lazzarin A, Cavassini M, Henry K et al. FLAMINGO study team. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 96 week results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet HIV. 2015; 2(4):e127–36. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00027-2 26424673

20. Stellbrink HJ, Reynes J, Lazzarin A, Voronin E, Pulido F, Felizarta F et al. SPRING-1 Team. Dolutegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1: 96-week results from a randomized dose-ranging study. AIDS. 2013; 27(11):1771–8. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283612419 23807273

21. Raffi F, Jaeger H, Quiros-Roldan E, Albrecht H, Belonosova E, Gatell JMet al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus twice-daily raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (SPRING-2 study): 96 week results from a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(11):927–35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70257-3 24074642

22. Walmsley S, Baumgarten A, Berenguer J, Felizarta F, Florence E, Khuong-Josses MAet al. Dolutegravir Plus Abacavir/Lamivudine for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naive Patients: Week 96 and Week 144 Results From the SINGLE Randomized Clinical Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015; 70(5):515–9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000790 26262777

23. Stellbrink HJ, Arribas JR, Stephens JL, Albrecht H, Sax PE, Maggiolo F et al. Co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019; 6(6):e364–e372 doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30080-3 31068272

24. Wohl DA, Yazdanpanah Y, Baumgarten A, Clarke A, Thompson MA, Brinson C. Bictegravir combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(6):e355–e36 doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30077-3 31068270

25. EACS (European AIDS Clinical Society) Guidelines. Version 9.1. October 2018. Available at: http://www.eacsociety.org/files/2018_guidelines-9.1-english.pdf.

26. Squires K, Kityo C, Hodder S, Johnson M, Voronin E, Hagins D et al. Integrase inhibitor versus protease inhibitor-based regimen for HIV-1 infected women (WAVES): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3:e410–e420. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30016-9 27562742

27. Messiaen P, Wensing AM, Fun A, Nijhuis M, Brusselaers N, Vandekerckhove L. Clinical use of HIV integrase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52562 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052562 23341902

28. Patel DA, Snedecor SJ, Tang WY, Sudharshan L, Lim JW, Cuffe R, et al. 48-week efficacy and safety of dolutegravir relative to commonly used third agents in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e105653 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105653 25188312

29. You J, Wang H, Huang X, Qin Z, Deng Z, Luo J et al. Therapy-Emergent Drug Resistance to Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors in HIV-1 Patients: A Subgroup Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. PLoS One. 201; 11(8):e0160087 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160087 27532886

30. Cahn P, Pozniak AL, Mingrone H, Shuldyakov A, Brites C, Andrade-Villanueva JFet al. Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study. Lancet. 2013; 382:700–8 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61221-0 23830355

31. M Llibre J, Raffi F, Moyle G, Behrens G, Bouee S, Reilly Get al. An Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Abacavir/Lamivudine + Dolutegravir in Initial Therapy.PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155406 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155406 27196332

32. Weber J, Rose JD, Vazquez AC, Winner D, Margot N, McColl DJet al. Resistance mutations outside the integrase coding region have an effect on human immunodeficiency virus replicative fitness but do not affect its susceptibility to integrase strand transfer inhibitors. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65631 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065631 23776513

33. DeAnda F, Hightower KE, Nolte RT, Hattori K, Yoshinaga T, Kawasuji Tet al. Dolutegravir interactions with HIV-1 integrase-DNA: structural rationale for drug resistance and dissociation kinetics. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e77448 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077448 24146996

34. Eron JJ, Clotet B, Durant J, Katlama C, Kumar P, Lazzarin A et al. Safety and efficacy of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects with raltegravir-resistant HIV type 1 infection: 24-week results of the VIKING Study. J Infect Dis. 2013; 207:740–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis750 23225901

35. Tsiang M, Jones GS, Goldsmith J, Mulato A, Hansen D, Kan E et al. Antiviral Activity of Bictegravir (GS-9883), a Novel Potent HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor with an Improved Resistance Profile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60:7086–97. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01474-16 27645238

36. Kuritzkes DR. Resistance to Dolutegravir—A Chink in the Armor? The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2018, 218: 673–675 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy186 29617815


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 9
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

plice
INSIGHTS from European Respiratory Congress
nový kurz

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii
Autoři: MUDr. Ladislav Korábek, CSc., MBA

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Petr Němec, Ph.D.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#