Authors: Merinda C. Nash aff001; Guillermo Diaz-Pulido aff003; Adela S. Harvey aff004; Walter Adey aff001 Authors place of work: Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United States of America aff001; Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia aff002; Griffith School of Environment and Science, and Australian Rivers Institute, Coast and Estuaries, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia aff003; Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia aff004 Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(9) Category: Research Article doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221396
Coralline algae are key biological substrates of many carbonate systems globally. Their capacity to build enduring crusts that underpin the formation of tropical reefs, rhodolith beds and other benthic substrate is dependent on the formation of a calcified thallus. However, this important process of skeletal carbonate formation is not well understood. We undertook a study of cellular carbonate features to develop a model for calcification. We describe two types of cell wall calcification; 1) calcified primary cell wall (PCW) in the thin-walled elongate cells such as central medullary cells in articulated corallines and hypothallial cells in crustose coralline algae (CCA), 2) calcified secondary cell wall (SCW) with radial Mg-calcite crystals in thicker-walled rounded cortical cells of articulated corallines and perithallial cells of CCA. The distinctive banding found in many rhodoliths is the regular transition from PCW-only cells to SCW cells. Within the cell walls there can be bands of elevated Mg with Mg content of a few mol% higher than radial Mg-calcite (M-type), ranging up to dolomite composition (D-type).
We propose the following three-step model for calcification. 1) A thin (< 0.5 μm) PCW forms and is filled with a mineralising fluid of organic compounds and seawater. Nanometer-scale Mg-calcite grains precipitate on the organic structures within the PCW. 2) Crystalline cellulose microfibrils (CMF) are extruded perpendicularly from the cellulose synthase complexes (CSC) in the plasmalemma to form the SCW. 3) The CMF soaks in the mineralising fluid as it extrudes and becomes calcified, retaining the perpendicular form, thus building the radial calcite. In Clathromorphum, SCW formation lags PCW creating a zone of weakness resulting in a split in the sub-surface crust. All calcification seems likely to be a bioinduced rather than controlled process. These findings are a substantial step forward in understanding how corallines calcify.
Cell walls – Algae – Sea water – Cellulose – Calcification – Plant cell walls – Carbonates – Secondary cells
Calcifying red algae are key components of many marine ecosystems globally. One of their main values is substrate provision [1,2] via their formation of calcified structures. The Peyssonnelia species mineralise aragonite [3–5], whereas the coralline algae (Corallinales, Sporolithales and Hapalidiales) mineralise Mg-calcite within their cell walls [6–10]. Thick crusts of crustose coralline algae (CCA) bind and cement together coral reefs [9,11,12] and bioherms and biostromes in the tropics [13] and the subarctic [14]. CCA can grow over and bind loose substrate, providing habitat for many other marine organisms in these environments [12,14]. Rhodoliths are key parts of near-shore marine ecosystems globally [15–19]. Fine branching articulated (i.e. geniculate) coralline algae are also key ecosystem components of many shallow, near-shore exposed and tide-pool environments [20–22]. It is calcification in the cell wall of the coralline algae that enables provision of these ecosystem components.
Despite the importance of coralline cell wall calcification in providing these ecosystem services, until recently there has been limited work on coralline algal calcification processes, particularly when compared to the abundance of studies on other calcifiers such as corals, molluscs and foraminifera. At present, there is no comprehensive model of calcification for coralline algae. The overriding motivation for this study is to understand how coralline algae calcify so that this information can be used for both predicting future changes in calcification with climate change and for improving CCA paleo-environmental proxies.
Climate archiving using CCA [14,23–25] has greatly increased interest in calcification mechanisms in the coralline algae. Banding of thick and thin cell walls has been attributed to winter and summer growth [18], although there are conflicting results showing sub-annual banding [26]. Increases in magnesium are attributed to warming temperatures and the thin-walled ‘summer growth’ cells have elevated magnesium. Recent concerns regarding the impacts of rising atmospheric pCO2 and consequent declining seawater pH (ocean acidification) on carbonate formation has driven contemporary studies on calcification in coralline algae (e.g. [27–33]). The focus has been on the interaction between pH and calcification, the presumption being that calcification is driven by the saturation state of seawater (e.g. [27,34]). However, there are conflicting results indicating that saturation state of the ambient seawater may not be a key driver of calcification [35–37].
Calcification in coralline algae has been viewed as a ‘one box’, or ‘one process’ model (e.g. [37]). A full understanding of calcification is frustrated by the lack of detailed knowledge on how the Mg-calcite is formed, the controls on calcification, and whether the formation process is the same for all types of skeletal carbonate present within coralline algae. There is recognition of cell wall and interfilament carbonate as being morphologically different. The cell wall forms Mg-calcite orientated radial perpendicular to the cell wall (termed radial calcite from now on) whereas the interfilament may have shorter grains orientated parallel to the nearest flat surface [38,39] or as clumps forming a deltoid shape in the Clathromorphum species [14]. However, there has been no attempt to separate the role of seawater carbonate concentration in the formation of these differing skeletal parts. While recent work has used boron isotopes (δ11B) as a proxy for pH at the site of calcification in CCA and articulated coralline algae [40], studying the isotopic composition of individual anatomical components separately is frustrated by the sub-micron scale of the anatomical components and associated skeletal features. Even utilizing state-of-the-art techniques in laser ablation Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) this level of organization cannot be examined for δ11B pH proxies. Thus it is not possible to identify if there is a difference in chemical signatures between the cell wall and interfilament.
The role of photosynthesis in influencing calcification is also unclear. Fundamentally photosynthesis is a controller of calcification via the provision of substrate [41]. It is also proposed to have an active role by locally elevating internal pH, leading to mineral precipitation in calcifying algae [42–44]. However, there is evidence that photosynthesis is not directly required for calcification to proceed as experimental work has demonstrated a decoupling between photosynthesis and calcification [37,45]. Furthermore, there are calcified non-photosynthetic parasitic CCA [38,46,47] and CCA continue to grow in Subarctic/Arctic winter darkness [48,49].
In addition to the uncertainties around the influence of seawater saturation state, internal pH and photosynthesis on calcification, there are conflicting propositions on how much control coralline algae exert over calcification processes and how calcification proceeds, specifically whether calcification is controlled, or induced as a result of a physiological process undertaken for a purpose other than mineral formation. Calcification is presumed induced in green algae [42,43] however there are suggestions of controlled calcification in coralline algae [6].
As detailed studies on sub-micron scale coralline algal biomineral characteristics that could inform understanding of calcification processes are lacking, much of the discussion on coralline biomineralisation has looked to the abundant literature on corals (e.g. [50–53]), molluscs (e.g. [54] and foraminifera (e.g. [55]). However, these calcifiers are all marine animals whereas, the coralline algae are marine “plants” [56,57]. Thus, relying on interpretations of skeletal formation within marine animals may confuse interpretation of calcification processes in the coralline cell walls.
To understand the potential impacts of climate change on coralline algal calcification, it is necessary to accurately identify the differing calcified components within the coralline crust and cell walls, and then determine whether the differing components have different processes of calcification [40]. Until this has been achieved, an accurate understanding of climate change impacts on calcification will be frustrated. Building that understanding is the motivation for this study.
In this study, we set out to combine existing knowledge of plant cell wall formation with high-magnification observations of cell wall features in coralline algae to develop a testable model of calcification. Specifically; we identify the multiple types of calcification and organic features within the coralline algae cell walls and interfilament regions and consider how each of these may form, given our present understanding of plant cell wall formation, organic composition, mineralisation processes and carbon and oxygen isotopic exchange. To identify the cell wall and calcification components we started with a detailed investigation using scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS) to identify the common calcification features of CCA (non-geniculate) and articulated (geniculate) corallines. From this, we build a calcification component schematic and then propose a biomineralisation model. We then adapt the model to account for unique features of the Clathromorphum species, an important coralline algal genus dominant in the Subarctic region. Peyssonnelia species were not studied and it is not known if aspects if these models could be applied to Peyssonnelia species calcification.
As many SEM figures are required to support the development of the model, and in order to facilitate streamlined reading, the paper structure is as follows; background information, proposed calcification model components followed by relevant SEM figures for each model component, discussion, concluding summary and methods. The supporting analytical results and sample detail tables (S1–S3 Tables) are in the supplementary information.
Numerous terms have been widely used to describe coralline internal anatomy. For the purposes of this paper, in CCA the thallus is composed of the hypothallus (those parts of the thallus orientated more-or-less parallel to the substrate) and the perithallus (those parts of the thallus orientated more-or-less perpendicular to the surface). The epithallus is the surface layer/s of the crust. All CCA have an intercalary meristem (cambium equivalent) of specific length (depending upon genus); this meristem produces upwards the overlying epithallus and underlying perithallus [58–60]. Cell elongation typically occurs gradually from the meristem for 3–10 cells down before reaching mature size except for Clathromorphum that complete all cellular growth in the meristem. Well-defined lateral channels form below the zone of cell elongation. These channels may be present as cell fusions—large holes of ill-defined shape, or smaller rounded holes (secondary pit connections) in the cell walls of adjacent cells of different filaments. The interfilament area (middle lamella in plants) is calcified and ranges in thickness from <0.5 to 2 microns [14,38,39]. The perithallial cells have thick (1–2 microns) cell walls. The base of the crust has a hypothallus of varying thickness, depending upon species, which typically forms the initial layer of crust laid down from the settled spore [58,60,61]. The hypothallial cells are elongate and thin walled [38]. These thin hypothallial-style cells also form from the perithallial meristem where the living crust has been wounded and rapid growth is required to cover the damaged area, and within emptied conceptacles where cells have regrown [14]. Some rhodolith-forming genera, e.g. Lithothamnion, can form internal bandings of alternating thin-walled elongate cells, high in Mg, to shorter, thicker walled cells, lower in Mg content [18,26].
Articulate coralline branches differ from CCA as they have a central medulla (orientated more less - parallel to the thallus surface) and peripheral cortex (orientated more-or-less perpendicular to the thallus surface). The medullary cells are elongated and thin-walled (< 500 nm) and there may be a layers of shorter more rounded cortical cells between the medullary and the surficial epithallus [62,63].
That actual mechanism of mineral formation is not definitively known. Historical studies of calcification in coralline algae have alternatively proposed that radial calcite is formed by 1) insertion of calcite crystals between radially-arranged polysaccharide fibrils [6] or 2) as mineral formation within an organic matrix [64]. The proposal by Cabioch and Giraud [6] would require the calcite crystal to be formed within the cell and pushed into the cell wall, perhaps similarly to coccolith plates. Borowitzka [43] proposed that coralline algae have semi-organised calcification, suggesting they may control the mineral formation. However, more recent experimental work has suggested that at least for the articulate coralline Amphiroa, the organism exerts little control over the mineral formation process [65].
Plant cells are enclosed by a lipid plasma membrane (plasmalemma) (Fig 1) [66,67] and the cell wall (primary cell wall). Between the cells is the middle lamella, which is pectin-rich and acts to glue adjoining cells together. Mature cells have additionally a secondary cell wall whereas newly growing or wound-repair cells generally only have primary cell walls. The thinner primary cell walls allow extension and shape flexibility [68]. Cellulose forms the bulk of the cell wall in plants [66,69] and algae [70]. Cellulose is a crystalline polysaccharide with molecules of linear chains of (1,4) β-linked-d-glucan (repeating monomers of glucose attached end to end) [66]. Crystalline cellulose microfibrils (CMF) are formed by Cellulose Synthase Complexes (CSC) within the plasmalemma (Fig 1) [67,69,71]. The CSC is a protein complex that can move within the membrane [72]. In plants, the CSC group in sixes in a rosette configuration. Each CSC polymerizes a single β-1,4-glucan cellulose chain that initially extrudes perpendicular to the membrane, then folds over, clumping with the other five individual chains to form the CMF. In the secondary cell wall of plants, the process of cellulose formation is particularly important as the concentrically-arranged lamellae of cellulose provides the structural strength enabling vertical growth and development of thick woody stems [73,74]. Primary and secondary cell walls have hemicellulose microfibrils, a matrix polysaccharide, also extruded from the plasma membrane. The secondary cell wall in plants has lignin present that further adds to the strength of the secondary cell wall. Both green and red algae can have primary and secondary cell walls [70], similarly to higher plants. The decalcified joints of the articulated coralline algae Calliarthron cheilosporioides have lignin and secondary cell walls [75]. Green algae have both rosette CSC, and CSC in linear patterns referred to as terminal complexes whereas red fleshy (non-calcified) algae are only recorded as having the linear pattern CSC [70]. There is no published work, as far as we are aware, on the cellulose formation mechanisms in calcified red algae.
The plasmalemma serves as a general permeability barrier between the cell vacuole and the cell wall because most water-soluble (polar) molecules cannot cross the lipid bi-layer [76]. The plasma cell membranes are themselves organelles and have a wide variety of molecular pumps and channels embedded in the membrane. Small, uncharged molecules can move through the membrane without the pumps. However, larger charged molecules require active ion transport to cross the membrane into the cell vacuole. This requirement for active transport means the plasmalemma is effectively an impermeable membrane. The outer perimeter of the cell wall is a permeable organic mesh [77] and active ion transport is not required.
The internal physical structure of coralline algae is similar to most fleshy red algae in being based in compact arrays of filaments (cells of common ancestry connected by primary pits, but differs in having an intercalary meristem) [1,6,78]. The intriguing possibility has been raised that calcification may be a process that would proceed commonly in fleshy algae, if specific calcification inhibitors were absent [43]. Considering the similarity in internal anatomical structure, we can look to the organic compounds that are present in calcifying algae but absent in fleshy algae (or the inverse), for potential clues as to drivers (or inhibitors) of calcification.
Analyses of organic compounds from 24 corallines, both articulated and crustose, found the key differences to fleshy red algae were the presence of a nonconventional sulfated xylogalactan polysaccharide, which has high quantities of xylose [79–82] and the absence of 3,6-anhydrogalactose, which is always present in fleshy red algae [79]. Alginic acids have been implicated in calcification in corallines [81,83] because these polymers have a high affinity for bivalent cations, especially calcium [79,84]. However, Bilan and Usov [79] raise a note of caution that the alginates may be from endolithic organisms within the corallines and not directly involved in calcification. A pectin-like substance has been identified in cell ends of articulated coralline algae [62]. Collagen and chitin have been identified in Clathromorphum compactum [85], but it is unknown if these are common to all corallines. The literature is summarised in Table 1.
Coralline algae also have the ability to decalcify parts of their skeleton in the formation of cell fusions, reproductive conceptacles [14] and articulated joints (genicula) in the articulated corallines, e.g. Calliarthron cheilosporioides [80]. While decalcification and consequent anatomical features are an important part of coralline physiology, and need to be considered in a final analysis of calcification in these organisms, the process of decalcification or formation of cell fusion, or pit connections, will not be considered further in this study.
While there has been little work done on the role of organic substrates in the biomineralisation processes of coralline algae, in the medical field of bone regeneration, the capacity of seaweed-derived polysaccharides such as alginates, to induce mineralisation has been widely studied and applied (e.g. [86–88]). Indeed, naturally derived biopolymers have been making a contribution to the field of regenerative medicine for decades [89,90]. Natural polymers such as cellulose, alginates, hemicellulose, lignin and chitin are turned into hydrogels that are then used as tissue regeneration substrates. Furthermore, advantage can be taken of the cellulose structure to use as a scaffold for bone implants. As an example, processed cellulose soaked in a calcium-rich solution then placed in simulated body fluids formed a mineralised coating (calcium phosphate) within days (e.g. [86,91]) and it has been proposed that regenerated cellulose viscous sponges can be used as implantable bone tissue (e.g. [92,93]). These medical studies provide insight into the potential processes of mineralisation that we can look to in developing a model for coralline calcification.
From the published plant and bone studies and cellular features identified in our extensive SEM imaging, there are several key components that we used to inform our calcification model.
Firstly, the presence of a secondary cell wall in higher plants and many fleshy red and green algae, indicates that consideration of calcification must include an assessment of secondary cell wall formation in coralline cells. Our assessment (based on SEM images) indicated that the elongated thin-walled cells that form the central medullary cells of articulated corallines and the CCA hypothallial cells form only a primary calcified cell wall. In contrast, the articulated coralline cortical cells and CCA perithallial cells form a secondary cell wall. That leads us to the second key consideration.
The main structural difference between the primary and secondary cell walls in plants, is the thicker SCW that is due to the formation of CMF. We look to the cellulose formation as the first step in identifying the process of the SCW radial calcification and consider calcification of the cellulose substrate.
Understanding how calcification of cellulose could proceed is informed by the bone regeneration studies. Key to those studies is the use of the cellulose as the scaffold and a calcium-rich fluid mixed with the organism’s body fluids to induce mineral formation without biological activity.
Finally, we incorporate the information on organic compounds, present and absent (Table 1), to propose the organism ‘body fluid’ that may be the key to inducing or enabling calcification of, or on, the organic components with the primary and secondary cell walls.
The following paragraphs are a summary of the components and proposed processes of calcification in coralline algae. The model (Figs 2–5) is drawn from the SEM imaging and Mg-content analyses of a range of species (S1–S3 Tables). The model does not include surficial epithallial cells. The coralline algae organic composition was not analysed for this study and we rely upon information in published literature to develop role of matrix organics. In the remainder of the paper, reference to plants includes both higher plants and fleshy algae. Genera studied (S3 Table) included CCA: Lithothamnion, Lithophyllum, Porolithon, Hydrolithon, Sporolithon, Spongites, Neogoniolithon, Kvaleya, Leptophytum, Phymatolithon, Clathromorphum, Titanoderma, Mesophyllum, Pneophyllum, Mastophora and unidentified epiphytes. Articulated coralline algae: Amphiroa, Jania, Corallina, Metagoniolithon, Lithothrix and Mesophyllum (species = 37, total number of samples n = 96).
As in higher plants, coralline algae can have both a primary cell wall (PCW) and secondary cell wall (SCW) (Fig 2), similarly to plants. The PCW is solely present in fast growing elongated cells (Fig 6). These PCW-only cells form the central medullary cells in articulated coralline algae (Figs 7–12) and the hypothallial (Fig 13–15), wound repair (Fig 6) and conceptacle ingrowth cells (Fig 16) in CCA. The SCW is present in addition to the PCW in the cortical cells of the articulated corallines (Figs 17–20) and the CCA perithallial cells (Figs 21–24). The PCW is thin (< 500 nm) and may be poorly to densely calcified with micro-granules of Mg-calcite, and occasionally is without calcification. The SCW is thick (1–2 microns) and is consistently comprised of radial Mg-calcite with micro-granules filling remnant spaces. The PCW carbonate varies in crystal size and shape. These carbonate granules may be densely infilling the PCW (Fig 7), present as vertical stacking of micro-granules (Figs 7 and 16), poorly infilling with grains spaced apart on a fibril mesh (Figs 9, 11, 15 and 16), and as an apparent mineral infill within a membrane (Fig 7). Bands of fibrils (~10–20 nm width), where visible, are parallel to the cell wall (Fig 14), with thinner fibrils present throughout the PCW forming a mesh (Fig 12). The PCW cell wall thickness ranges from ~50 nm to ~500 nm. The wider PCW in CCA may be incorporating the start of the SCW (Fig 14). There is a notable species difference amongst the articulated corallines. Amphiroa PCW (Figs 7 and 8) are more densely calcified than those of Corallina (Figs 9 and 10) and Jania (Figs 11 and 12) and appear to be less prone to breaking. The medullary walls of the Corallina and Jania are poorly developed and the boundary between the external edge of the cell wall, the middle lamella and adjacent medullary cell is not always visible (Fig 11). The production of the SCW in the CCA perithallial cells starts with the addition of a wider thickness of carbonate (Fig 21). The radial grains generally appear as a continuous grain (Figs 21, 23 and 24), but may also be present as continuous series of connected stacked grains (Figs 17 and 22). The radial grains appear to be comprised of clumped smaller fibrous grains (Fig 22). Etching removes smaller space-filling carbonate granules and reveals the laminar bands of fibrils throughout the SCW (Figs 17–19 and 21–23) and in a concentrated mass around the cell wall perimeter. Thinner fibrils weave apparently randomly throughout the SCW (Fig 22). The fibrils are seen both on the surface of the radial grains and appearing to be encapsulated within the grain (Figs 17–19 and 21) and threading through it, similarly to wire through a fence post (Figs 17 and 21). The corners of the articulated medullary cells may have partially formed SCW (Fig 20).
In contrast, in epiphyte CCA the primary cell wall may be uncalcified with the only carbonate present being interfilament grains or it may have thin calcified PCW similarly to CCA hypothallial cells [94] (Figs 25 and 26).
Interfilament carbonate is that forming in the area between both vertically and horizontally adjacent cells, between the base and top of cells within a filament, and between the side-walls of cells in adjacent filaments. Interfilament carbonate is typically rice-grain-shaped Mg-calcite, sub-micron length, generally orientated parallel to the proximal cell wall surface (Fig 20) and may have serrated edges (Fig 17). These features are typical for all genera but Clathromorphum. Thin fibrils connecting grains may be visible (Fig 27). In Clathromorphum, elongate (2–3 microns) thin cylindrical grains clump together into a deltoid formation, this is discussed in detail in the Clathromorphum calcification model paragraphs. In CCA epiphytes (Fig 25) where the PCW is uncalcified, longer (~1–2 microns) interfilament grains are typical. Interfilament between calcified cells of epiphytes can be small blocky grains (Fig 26). Interfilament carbonate is consistently present between CCA perithallial (Figs 21, 23 and 24) and hypothallial (Figs 6 and 13–15) cells. However interfilament is minimal or absent between CCA wound repair (Fig 6C–6E) and conceptacle infill cells (Fig 16). Articulated corallines have substantially less interfilament calcification present and it is generally absent or minimal between the long edges of medullary cells (Figs 8–10 and 12); it is predominantly present at the junctions of cells (Fig 8).
The Mg content is higher in PCW relative to the SCW within the same crust (Fig 28) [10,38,39]. In CCA perithallial cells, where bands of higher Mg content are present, these appear to be the portion of PCW at the outer and inner perimeter of the SCW (Fig 29). Any additional elevated-Mg bands within the SCW are at sites where the wall appears segmented suggesting there may have been a growth interruption in the radial calcite (Fig 29) and temporary reversion to PCW. The higher Mg values recorded in the cell wall bands range from very high magnesium calcite (VHMC) (25–36 mol% MgCO3) up to dolomite composition (>37 mol% MgCO3 [95,96]). These higher Mg content carbonates are grouped together and referred to as ‘D-type’ carbonate. D-type is used to reflect their range of Mg composition from higher Mg-calcite up to dolomite composition, but to differentiate from dolomite composition carbonate found as cell lining in Porolithon onkodes [8]. D-type was found in Hydrolithon, Porolithon, Lithothamnion, Lithophyllum, Mesophyllum, Tenarea, Pneophyllum, Spongites and Amphiroa species (S3 Table).
While elevated Mg around the perimeter of the cell wall was prevalent in all samples tested, not all CCA had Mg-content elevated to D-type levels. Leptophytum laeve (Fig 30), an Arctic species, had a range of Mg of 7.4–16.9 mol% MgCO3 in the perithallial cell wall with the highest values at the perimeters. Because the higher Mg carbonate is present differently to the bulk of the radial and interfilament Mg-calcite, but does not reach the high values for D-type grouping, we propose to refer to these bands of elevated Mg as ‘M-type’. M-type was found in Leptophytum, Phymatolithon, Hydrolithon, Sporolithon, Neogoniolithon, Mastophora, Metagoniolithon, Jania, Corallina, Lithothrix and Mesophyllum (S3 Table). Clathromorphum species were predominantly M-type, but two samples had elevated Mg in the D-type range in some hypothallial cells indicating that there was the capacity to form D-type carbonate, but typically it was M-type.
With the possible exception of the Clathromophum sp. (S2 Table), interfilament carbonate always has lower average Mg-content than the cell wall (Fig 28) [38,39]. Analyses of Clathromorphum sp. found areas of crust where cell wall had higher Mg as well as areas where cell wall Mg content was not significantly different from interfilament Mg-content.
From our detailed SEM imaging from this and other studies, knowledge of plant anatomy and organic composition, and mineral formation processes demonstrated using a cellulose substrate, we propose the following process for the interaction between organics and biomineralisation. The structural organics within the PCW are predominantly hemicellulose microfibrils whereas the SCW has additionally, cellulose as extruded cellulose microfibrils (CMF) (Fig 3), similarly to other plants. The outer perimeter of the cell wall is a permeable porous mesh of fibrils (Figs 3A and 17) similarly to plants [77] whereas the inner perimeter is bounded by the impermeable plasmalemma lipid membrane. Based on the absence of impermeable barriers other than the plasmalemma, we propose that seawater penetrates down the interfilament, through the outer perimeter of the cell wall, mixing with the organism-produced fluids resulting in a mixed matrix fluid that enables Mg-calcite mineral formation. The particular matrix fluid composition would at the least include sulfated xylogalactans, but not 3,6-anhydrosgalactose. We propose that the PCW carbonate (Fig 3A) is predominantly a mineral formation on, rather than of, an organic surface. That is, micro-granules precipitate out of the mixed matrix fluid onto any available surfaces. We base this proposal on the small grain size, range of crystal shapes formed, and sometimes absences of mineral formation. There may be mineralisation of hemicellulose fibrils, however this either does not happen as they are extruded, or the mineral formation is not robust enough to cement the fibrils perpendicular.
We propose that in the SCW (Fig 3A and 3B), as the CMF is extruded, it soaks in the mixed matrix fluid and becomes mineralised while it is still perpendicular to the cell wall membrane, forming the radial Mg-calcite (Fig 3). As bone mineral growth experiments have shown, cellulose can form a substrate for mineral formation after being soaked in a calcium-rich fluid (0.05M CaCl2, [91]) then placed in simulated body fluids (noting that this Ca concentration is higher than in seawater and the concentration at the site of calcification in corallines is not known). Considering that the cellulose extruded in the SCW would be immediately exposed to the calcium and magnesium in seawater, it is reasonable to consider probable that this exposure together with the coralline matrix fluids results in mineralisation of the cellulose. If this were to occur rapidly after the cellulose was extruded, then the CMF would be mineralised in the perpendicular position (Fig 3B and 3C) and not able to fold over and run parallel as it does in plants and fleshy algae (Fig 1). The key difference between the SCW and PCW is that the SCW radial calcite is mineralisation of the organic substrate, whereas the PCW carbonate granules are precipitating on the organic substrate. Within all the corallines, smaller micro-granules fill in spaces between the radial grains. Most probably these granules precipitate out from the mixed matrix fluid, and the hemicellulose and cellulose fibrils provide an initial nucleating substrate [86]. These micro-granules were readily removed by etching for 20 minutes in deionised water. The ease of dissolution relative to the radial Mg-calcite would in part be due to their smaller size, but also suggests that radial calcite has a degree of protection as would be conferred by an organic scaffold.
It is not clear from this study how the interfilament carbonate forms. Interfilament is readily removed by etching, lending support to interfilament being a precipitate, or having substantially less organic matrix than the radial Mg-calcite.
Species in the genus Clathromorphum genera are unique amongst CCA as they are the only known species that develop a split along the meristem cell layer [14]; it is in this split that cellular growth, calcification and cell division occurs (Fig 31). Other genera of CCA provide cell division in the meristem, but cell elongation growth is progressive (gradual) away from the meristem (Fig 32). For this reason the coralline model (Figs 2 and 3) is adapted (Figs 4 and 5) to account for the unique features present in the Clathromorphum. The cell formation outwards (up) and inwards (down) from the Clathromorphum meristem split is a mirror image (Fig 33). Both sides show ~ 1 micron of PCW-only above and below the split line (stage 1, Figs 4 and 5) (Fig 34) through which CMF leaks into the interfilament zone (stage 2, Figs 4 and 5) (Figs 33 and 34). The interfilament is initially the bulk of the calcification formed at the split (stage 3, Figs 4 and 5), with minor mineralisation within the PCW (stage 4, Figs 4 and 5) followed by formation of the radial SCW (stage 5, Figs 4 and 5). This thinner cell wall creates a zone of weakness that is the split, resulting in easy removal of the surficial cell layers (epithallial and 1–7 perithallial cells) (Fig 31). The leaking of organic material into the interfilament (Figs 33 and 34) has not been observed for any other coralline algae we have imaged, nor have we found any other examples in published literature. There is no typical PCW carbonate visible prior to the formation of the radial Mg-calcite (Fig 34) and it is possible that there is minimal PCW carbonate present in the side cell walls.
The interfilament of the Clathromorphum sp. is distinctly different from the other genera we analysed. Morphologically, the crystals (~ 2–3 microns long) are ~5–15 times the length of interfilament Mg-calcite grains in other genera. The shape is thin and cylindrical (Figs 27 and 35), in contrast to the rice-grain shape in other genera. Further, in other genera, the interfilament crystals are generally aligned with the nearest flat surface [38,39], whereas in Clathromorphum sp. the grains form into a deltoid clump (Figs 27 and 36) with an arrowhead along the meristem split (Fig 35). In our SEM analyses, the etching method that dissolved the interfilament of other genera had no apparent impact on the deltoid interfilament (Fig 36) remaining intact similarly to the radial Mg-calcite. The rice-grained shaped interfilament between the Clathromorphum hypothallial cells was removed by the etching, indicating the Clathromorphum deltoid interfilament has a degree of extra protection relative to the rice-grain interfilament. Considering that the interfilament responds similarly to the radial Mg-calcite under etching conditions, and the consistency of its morphology, we propose that the deltoid interfilament in the Clathromorphum is mineralised CMF (stage 3, Figs 4 and 5), similarly to the radial Mg-calcite in the SCW.
Within discrete parts of Clathromorphum crust, there can be a switch from the deltoid interfilament, to minimal rice-grain type interfilament while the cell wall continues to form radial Mg-calcite (Fig 37). This results in a decrease in the total thickness of the wall and interfilament. The Mg-content is higher for the non-deltoid cell wall relative to cell wall with deltoid (17.9 and 11.5 mol% MgCO3 respectively) (S2 Table). It is not clear what drives the switch to non-deltoid interfilament. Possibly this is an abrupt response to an environmental change such as resumption of growth of winter period growth cessation [14] or regrowth after shallow wounding. The higher Mg content in the cell walls of the non-deltoid interfilament region cell walls provides support for the possibility that there is an absence of PCW carbonate in cell walls associated with the delayed formation of the SCW.
In other genera we have studied (Porolithon, Phymatolithon, Leptophytum) [10,38,39], the Mg content of the interfilament Mg-calcite is always lower than the cell wall Mg-calcite Mg content. In contrast, the results for the Clathromorphum are inconclusive. Mg content for interfilament and SCW were not different for C. circumscriptum, [Cell wall is 13.8 mol%, (n = 8), interfilament 13.1 mol% (n = 8), p = 0.39] but were different for C. compactum [interfilament 13.2, mol%, n = 8, SCW 16.1 mol%, n = 8, p = <0.01)] (S2 Table).
Tsekos [70] proposed that in marine algae, the CSC’s are in linear grids, not the rosette formation found in higher plants. The form of the CSC’s in the corallines was not specifically investigated in this study. However, support for a linear grid formation in the corallines may be found in an area of damage and partial regrowth imaged in a C. compactum sample (Fig 38). There is a regular grid pattern of rectangular dimensioned carbonate extrusions. These extrusions are clumps of mineralised fibrils of comparable diameter to the radial Mg-calcite and interfilament cylindrical grains. There are ~30 fibrils on the long side and ~10 on the short side. We can find no other explanation for these features, other than they are developed from CSC’s. However, specifically targeted analytical work would be required to confirm this proposition.
Within a CCA, the change from cells with SCW to PCW-only cells is always seen as abrupt switch with a clear change in cell wall structure across a < 1 micron length (Figs 6C, 6E and 39). In contrast, a shift from the SCW-only to PCW is usually gradual (Figs 13A and 40). The SCW thickens over 2–10 cells before forming the complete SCW. The abrupt switch to PCW after a wounding event can be explained by the physical removal of the shallow SCW perithallial cells, followed by a switch of the remaining cell to repair mode, hence being only PCW. However, there are examples where there have been abrupt switches without wounding. In three CCA used in growth experiments in previously published studies [33,97] and an unpublished study (S3 Table), we identified bands of elongate PCW-only cells, with elevated Mg, that formed immediately after the time of collection (Fig 41) (S2 Table). The three samples containing this band were three different genera (Lithophyllum, Clathromorphum, Porolithon), collected from three very different environments, (Mediterranean, Gulf of Maine, Great Barrier Reef) and all subject to different treatments (Lithophyllum cabiochae—no staining, transfer to higher CO2 and temperature treatment; Clathromorphum compactum—staining which did not take and transfer to aquaria; P. onkodes—staining and embedding in resin, 7 days in total in aquaria then returned to the reef site). The only common element was removal from the natural environment and transfer to aquaria. It is not known what drives this growth response to changing culturing conditions. In L. cabiochae there is also an abrupt absence of photosynthetic pigments in this transfer band (Fig 42).
The banding of low to high-density cells, as found in many branching rhodoliths [18,26,98] is formed by a periodic abrupt switch from SCW cells to PCW-only cells and the gradual shift back to SCW cells (Figs 39 and 43). This switch can take place across a cell, before the cell has been fully formed, suggesting this change is an abrupt response to an external event. The PCW cells have the highest total Mg-content. Over ~5–10 cells, as the walls thicken with the formation of SCW there is an associated decline in average Mg-content (Fig 39).
The Mg content for the higher Mg carbonates in the PCW was determined using X-ray diffraction. The Lithothamnion glaciale (sample from Scotland) Mg-calcite has 13 mol% MgCO3 as determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD) of a bulk sample (Fig 44). However, on the XRD Mg-calcite peak there is distinct asymmetry toward higher Mg extending over the position for 40–50 mol% for disordered dolomite (34–39 mol% for ordered dolomite). SEM-EDS transects across the cell wall return ranges of 25–40 mol% MgCO3 (Fig 43) noting these values probably do not capture the highest actual Mg-content due to contribution from surrounding lower Mg values. These range of values are outside of what is considered Mg-calcite, and in the range for VHMC and approaching dolomite values (> 37 mol% MgCO3). Photosynthetic pigments increase with the increasing amount of SCW and there is an abrupt cessation of pigments aligned to the change to PCW-only cells (Fig 42). This feature of higher Mg to dolomite composition is also present in Lithothamnion sp. from Panama (Fig 39).
A summary of the calcification features in the coralline algae analysed is presented in Table 2.
Our study shows that the coralline PCW-only cells form when rapid growth and flexible shape is required as for wound repair, hypothallial growth and central medullary cells articulate coralline algae. In contrast, SCW develops in mature cell growth where consistent shape and strength is required as in the perithallial cells of CCA. This distinction is similar to higher plants, where the PCW consists of the flexible polysaccharides cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin; the SCW also has rigid lignin. Lignin and the formation of a non-calcified secondary cell wall have been found in the decalcified genicula of the articulated geniculate coralline, Calliarthron heilosporioides [75]. It is tempting to equate SCW calcification in CCA to the lignin of woody plants. Indeed, it does appear that calcification allows the vertical accretion of the CCA, similarly to the strengthening by lignin enabling load-bearing wood.
Experimental work using cellulose to induce mineral formation provides support for our proposal that biomineralisation proceeds via the soaking of cellulose in seawater, together with the organism-produced organic compounds. Abundant calcium-phosphate formed when cellulose was pre-soaked in calcium-rich fluid then soaked in compounds found in mammalian bone [91]. Mg-calcite formed when coralline algal organic extracts were added [99], or the concentration of the cellulose derivative was increased [100]. It is also conceivable that the organism fluids are not required for carbonate induction where cellulose is present. Carbonate minerals have formed in beaker conditions where the wood or cellulose derivative has been simply soaked in or seawater-similar [100] or calcium-rich fluids [101]. Borowitzka [43] observed that fleshy algae have a greater number of complex organic compounds than calcifying algae (including non-corallines). Borowitzka proposed that within these extra compounds there may be a carbonate inhibitor, and that but for this inhibitor, calcification could proceed in all marine algae. Thus, although we propose in our model that organic compounds are part of the process, it is possible that the coralline cellulose soaking in seawater, in semi-closed conditions and without a calcification inhibitor, is sufficient for carbonate to form.
No model of calcification would be complete without consideration of whether the mineral formation is controlled or induced. This is important because it aids our predictions of how external factors may or may not impact calcification. We specifically clarify here that for this consideration, we are differentiating between the production of the organic cell wall structure, which is a metabolically controlled process, and the subsequent formation of Mg-calcite. While it could be argued that because formation of the organic structure is biologically controlled, and, Mg-calcite formation is dependent those sites for a nucleating substrate, then, therefore Mg-calcite formation is biologically controlled. We specifically address this argument by looking to the characteristics currently accepted [102,103] as features to define controlled mineralisation as compared to biologically induced mineralisation. Before progressing, we clarify the definitions we rely upon in this discussion as they pertain to coralline algae. Controlled: a calcification outcome that is not a byproduct of another process, but where that other process exists solely and specifically for the purpose of driving calcification. Induced: a calcification outcome that is a byproduct of a process that is not occurring for the purpose of that outcome. Site of calcification: the exact point on/in a substrate where mineral nucleation takes place. Calcification compartment: the larger space, cell wall or interfilament, containing the sites of calcification. Organism fluid: the matrix fluids produced by the coralline and present in the cell wall and interfilament. Calcifying fluid: the mix of organism fluid and seawater from which minerals form. Ion transport: an active transport mechanism to transport charged ions across an otherwise impermeable barrier.
The defining features of controlled biomineralisation are; mineralisation in an isolated compartment, a specialised three-dimensional macromolecule organic matrix for mineral formation and the requirement for active pumping of cations from the cell to the site of mineral formation [102]. These are considered in turn below. Our key assumptions underpinning each conclusion are highlighted.
Isolated compartment To be completely isolated, the compartment needs to be bounded by impermeable barrier (typically a membrane) where active pumping is required for ion transport through the barrier. This is in contrast to a compartment being semi isolated, as is the well-known case of calcification in Halimeda [42]. In the corallines, neither the interfilament nor the cell walls are externally bounded by impermeable membranes. The interfilament opens to the surface of the alga and there can be visible gaps at the surface where the interfilament is exposed [14]. The cell wall of plants is bounded internally by the phospholipid plasmalemma, an impermeable membrane. However, the external perimeter of the cell wall is a fibrillar mesh [77]. While seawater movement into the coralline cell wall will be slowed, providing a semi-closed system, the mesh is not an impermeable barrier that requires diffusion or active pumping to transport ions across. Based on the observations within this study and associated assumptions, calcification in the coralline algae does not meet this defining feature of an isolated compartment. Key assumption - that the observed mesh of fibrils at the external perimeter of the cell wall is not impermeable to charged ions.
Specialised three-dimensional macromolecule organic matrix for mineral formation In the context of biomineralisation, this criterion is further clarified as the structures and compositions of these organic frameworks that are genetically programmed to perform essential regulating and/or organising functions that will result in the formation of composite biominerals [102]. This typically includes proteins [53,104,105] with a high proportion of acidic amino acids and phosphorylated groups. There is as yet no genetic analysis that we are aware of, that has specifically quantified genes involved in calcification in the coralline algae. However, none of the anatomical features identified in the coralline algae are unique to coralline algae. The interfilament (middle lamella) is common to all plants and fleshy algae as is the PCW and SCW. We have assumed the radial calcite is mineralisation of cellulose and that cellulose in coralline algae is comparable in composition and production to cellulose in fleshy algae and plants. Thus, even the distinctive radial calcite forms on a non-specialised organic matrix. Key assumption - that the organics mineralised for the radial Mg-calcite are not substantially different from plant cellulose.
Active ion transport of cations from the cell to the site of mineral formation Active ion transport is only necessary to move charged ions across an impermeable membrane, such as from the ambient seawater, across the plasmalemma into the cell vacuole for metabolic processes. Because there are no impermeable membranes separating the interfilament and cell wall sites of calcification from seawater and the contained ions, seawater can freely exchange throughout the calcification compartments. The depth of penetration of seawater by this exchange is demonstrated by the rapid incorporation of stains, e.g. alizarin red or calcein, with calcofluor white penetrating 100’s of microns into CCA P. onkodes in less than 10 minutes [106]. As there is not an impermeable membrane separating the sites of calcification from their ion source, active ion transport is not required. Therefore, the coralline algae do not meet this criterion. Key assumption - that the observed mesh of fibrils at the external perimeter of the cell wall is not impermeable.
Consideration of features characteristic of bio-induced calcification Characteristic features indicating bio-induced mineralisation include; variations in structure and particle size, cell surfaces often acting as nucleating substrates and the biology has little control over the mineral type [102]. We add another two criteria; absence of control over calcifying fluid composition and no dependence on elevated pH for mineral nucleation. These are considered in turn below.
Variations in structure and particle size Induced biominerals typically show great variation in external morphology, water content, trace/minor element compositions, structure and particle size [102]. In the corallines the three carbonates present (the interfilament, PCW and radial) differ in shape, particle size and elemental composition (Figs 6–37). The PCW shows the greatest variability in size and structure from being poorly calcified to densely calcified, with irregular grain shapes to plate-like, even being at times not present. The interfilament is generally rice-grain shaped but this can vary, along with the amount of interfilament carbonate present. The radial carbonate is the most consistent of the three, being consistent within and across species. When compared to the precise and consistent controlled mineral formations of mollusk nacre [107] and coccolith plates [108] the mineral structures and particle sizes exhibit great heterogeneity. The coralline algae meet this criterion. Key observation - minerals in CCA are variable in structure and size.
Cell surfaces often acting as nucleating substrates Based on the images presented in Figs 6–27, the plasmalemma membrane itself does not appear to act as a nucleating substrate for the cell wall carbonate. However, the cell wall organics do act as substrates for both the PCW and radial carbonate. The external surface of the cell wall appears to act as a nucleating substrate for interfilament-edge carbonate, but the interfilament grains themselves do not appear to nucleate on the cell wall surface (Figs 17, 20 and 24). In the coralline algae, organic surfaces within the cell wall act as nucleating substrates. This provides support for the conclusion of biologically induced mineralisation. Key observation - Mg-calcite forms on surfaces.
Biology has little control over the mineral type This is an interesting criterion for biologically induced calcification, and possibly misleading. Biologically induced calcification can form the same type of mineral within all species in the genera, for example, aragonite is always formed in Halimeda spp. Clearly the organic environment produced and controlled by the organism influences the type of mineral that could form, should the micro-environmental conditions induce mineral nucleation. There are many examples of marine organisms, which are accepted to have controlled calcification, able to produce both aragonite and calcite (gastropods - [109]) and specific proteins control the switch to aragonite (molluscs - [110]). The demonstration of multiple types of Mg minerals found across micron-scale areas within corallines is however, suggestive of a lack of control on the mineral type. While the suite of carbonate minerals found in CCA, both tropical and Arctic, suggest the corallines meet this criteria for biologically-induced calcification, we question the robustness of this criterion as a characteristic feature. Key observation - multiple types of Mg-carbonates present within the cell wall. Key assumption - that there are no organics produced by the coralline specifically for the purpose of forming Mg-calcite.
Absence of control over calcification fluid We have proposed that calcification in coralline algae is dependent on the mixed matrix fluid, i.e. a calcification fluid that is the combination of the organism fluid with seawater. As the seawater penetration cannot be controlled because the interfilament and external perimeters of the cell wall are porous, it follows that the proportions of seawater and organism fluid in the final mixed matrix fluid cannot be controlled. Thus, while the organism-produced fluid is a result of controlled metabolic activities, the final mixed matrix fluid, i.e. calcifying fluid, is not controlled. This provides further support for calcification being induced, rather than controlled. Key assumption - that the observed mesh of fibrils at the external perimeter of the cell wall is not impermeable and that calcification is dependent on the mixed matrix fluid.
Mineral nucleation not dependent on organism-driven elevated pH Firstly, we define elevated pH as pH above ambient seawater pH. Recent research has demonstrated pH is elevated above ambient seawater in the calcification fluid of Neogoniolithon [40,111], Sporolithon and Amphiroa [40], and Clathromorphum [31]. These findings provide support for elevated pH, however, the lowest reconstructed pH was 8.15 (Amphiroa) and that is equivalent to ambient pH in many marine environments [112]. Mg-calcite can form in semi-closed spaces (dead cells and interfilament) in parts of CCA crust that has been damaged where seawater can penetrate, or at the base of the crust where the organism is no longer metabolically active (images in [113]). Beaker experiments using organic extracts from corallines have formed Mg-calcite without elevated pH [99]. A range of Mg-calcite compositions were formed at starting pH ~7.7–7.9 [100] using cellulose and agar extracts. Calcification experiments on dead Amphiroa found that calcification continued in dead skeleton, in the dark and at low pH 7.2 [45]. More recently, calcification-inducing proteins extracted from coral, were able to induce aragonite formation at pH of 8.2 and 7.6 [104] indicating that high pH is not necessarily required for mineral formation. These studies indicate that calcium carbonate is not always dependent on elevated pH to nucleate. Thus caution must be exercised when drawing a causal relationship from the determination of elevated pH in coralline carbonate to concluding that elevated pH is a requirement for mineral nucleation.
While it is well established that elevated pH will increase rates of precipitation, and pH in the coralline cell walls and boundary layer will be elevated by photosynthesis and possibly other metabolic processes [37,40] thus increasing rates of precipitation, there is no evidence to suggest that calcification cannot proceed without elevated pH. Indeed, the continuation of calcification in dark conditions [14,37] indicates that this process is at the least not dependent on photosynthetic or light driven pH elevating processes, the only pH elevating-processes known for the corallines at this time. Even with elevated pH driving faster rates of calcification, the total amount of carbonate will be limited by the amount of cell wall and interfilament space available. As evidence indicates that Mg-calcite can form in solution below ambient pH and there is no evidence thus far demonstrating that elevated pH is required for calcification in corallines, this suggests that there is no requirement for the organism to actively elevate pH for the purpose of calcification. Therefore, this criterion is supported. Key assumption - that mineral nucleation can proceed within the coralline at the same solution pH levels demonstrated experimentally.
Support for biologically induced calcification The main criteria for induced calcification in coralline algae are either proven or supported, while there is little support for criteria defining controlled calcification. Thus it appears that calcification in coralline algae is probably an induced process, not specifically controlled by the organism. Clearly the organic structures of the coralline and its internal processes enable calcification, but enable is not the same as for the purpose of that is required to meet the definition of controlled calcification. It is this difference that we have explored with this discussion and found that this purpose has not been demonstrated. It is important to note our key assumptions underpinning our conclusion for induced calcification and that should any of these be proven in the future to be incorrect then our conclusion of induced would need to be revisited. At this time we are not aware of any data that would suggest our key assumptions are wrong.
Although we suggest that calcification is not dependent on active ion transport to the site of calcification, active transport of ions for metabolic activity must have an influence on calcification rates. For coralline algae, active HCO3- transporters (CO2 concentrating mechanisms) are used to move DIC across the plasmalemma to elevate CO2 at the site of Rubisco, as evidenced by organic δ13C values > -29 [36,114,115]. It is likely that a proportion of this respired CO2 is incorporated into the carbonate. Continued growth and calcification of coralline algae in dark conditions [14,37] and without photosynthesis (Kvaleya epilaeve Adey & Sperapani) [46] indicate that calcification is not limited by photosynthesis, other than for the initial provision of stored energy required to continue growth. Active pumping for metabolic purposes will likely increase the rates of seawater exchange as ions are drawn from the solute in the cell wall and utilized in growth processes and this will likely increase the rate of calcification.
Understanding the differences in calcification that are associated with the meristem split in Clathromorphum is important as calcification may respond quite differently to other coralline algae under warming temperatures. Because of the meristem split, penetration of the ambient seawater to the site of calcification will likely be greater than for CCA without this split. Some of the compounds in red algal cells are water-soluble [99,116] and solubility increases with elevated temperatures [117]. The distribution of Clathromorphum is restricted to cooler waters of the Sub-arctic and adjacent Boreal regions (< 12o C max for summer growth [14]) indicating this unique calcification may already be restricted by temperature effects on algal compounds. Further research is required to test this proposal, however, climate change research on this genera should take into account this unique calcification process when considering how temperature change may impact calcification.
Understanding controls on Mg content is important because the amount of Mg incorporated into carbonate can reflect a change in mineral type and, Mg is the most commonly used element for temperature reconstruction (e.g. [18,98]). It has previously been established that hypothallial-style growth needs to be avoided when measuring Mg for climate proxy work [38,39]. That caution has been reaffirmed by the findings in this study. Our study has established the Mg bands within cell walls recently documented [8,118] are likely remnants of PCW, and that XRD patterns showing dolomite asymmetry off the Mg-calcite peak indicate the presence of D-type carbonate in these bands. Ragazzola et al., [118] showed that these bands in Lithothamnion glaciale, could be seasonally affected, being absent in winter growth, and were absent in higher CO2 treatments. We have not attempted to answer the question of why these bands may be absent, or if present why they would have lower Mg. Finding the dolomite-composition values in cell-wall banding in CCA from colder climates of Scotland, to tropical environments of Panama and Ashmore Reef (S3 Table) indicates that temperature is not the predominant control. Further an absence of measurable change in the higher Mg-calcite composition for experimental CCA Lithophyllum cabiochae [97] over a 3°C offset further supports a lack of temperature control. The L. cabiochae experiment also found no effect of higher CO2 on the higher Mg-calcite composition. Thus response of the cell-wall Mg banding to temperature and CO2 may be species-specific or inconsistently present.
This improved understanding of calcification in coralline algae will aid in making more accurate paleo-environmental reconstructions. A key message from this study is the importance of comparing corallines with the same type of morphology, that is, temperature calibrations developed for rhodoliths with internal banding and D-type carbonate are not applicable for encrusting CCA such as Clathromorphum. Further, it is important to ensure that Mg measurement transects do not include switches to PCW-only cell walls as these could be interpreted falsely as a warming signal.
Our model shows that the bands generally considered to represent summer and winter (e.g. [18]), may instead be representing a switch in growth type that could be unrelated to seasonal changes and perhaps are driven by light changes [26] or other as yet unidentified drivers. Where the bands in rhodoliths have been experimentally demonstrated to form annually [18] the key question that needs to be answered before using the higher Mg for summer temperature proxies, is how much of this higher Mg is actually driven by temperature, as compared to the anatomical change. Assuming that growth rate is consistent over the year and using branch axial distance as a proxy for time may also be problematic as the PCW-only long cells typically are faster growing than the thick-walled SCW perithallial cells. Furthermore, the rhodolith Mg-content shift represents a change to different minerals, i.e. VHMC, dolomite. Therefore, it is critically important for climate proxy work to consider whether the Mg-content reported is determined by mineral analyses, i.e. XRD, which determines the changes in Mg-content of the Mg-calcite phases and shows when other phases are present, or by bulk methods such as electron microprobe analysis, ion microprobe analysis, SEM-EDS, laser ablation, which only measure total Mg-content without identifying minerals present.
The calcification model we have developed is consistent with cell wall formation in both higher plants and fleshy red algae and accounts for the complex array of carbonate forms and Mg-compositions present within coralline algae. Support is in favour of calcification being an induced, not a controlled process. Further work is required to determine the key organic compounds required for each type of calcification. This improved understanding will allow identification of the response of each component part to different environmental conditions, and could aid in understanding responses to climate change. Future experimental work should look to the properties of plant cell walls to guide investigations.
SEM-EDS was made using a Zeiss UltraPlus field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with HKL electron backscatter diffraction (EDS). Samples were polished, mounted on stubs with crystal bond and platinum or carbon coated. SEM using the Zeiss was carried out at the Australian National University, Centre for Advanced Microscopy. SEM-EDS was used for spot analyses to quantify the elemental composition of representative parts of the CCA crust and confirm mineral distribution within the crust. For EDS the operating voltage was 15 kV with 11 mm working distance. A range of settings were used for imaging; secondary electron (SE) showing topography and backscatter electron imaging (BSE) which shows higher magnesium areas as darker carbonate and is useful for rapid visual identification of mineral distribution. The EDS data for comparison of the cell wall and interfilament in the Clathromorphum circumscriptum and C. compactum was obtained using the Zeiss.
A second round of SEM and EDS was undertaken using a NOVA NanoSEM FEI at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History’s Department of Mineralogy with the aim of measuring the Mg content of 200–300 nm bands visible with SEM-BSE within the cell walls. A setting of 7 kV, working distance 6.0 mm and 0.34 nA current was found most effective. This setting results in a smaller interaction volume (measurement field) than the 15 kV. This lower voltage was used for the EDS line. Further information on the calibration undertaken for this EDS can be found in Nash and Adey [38].
The rhodolith samples were ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle. Fluorite was added as an internal standard to allow precise alignment of the XRD pattern. The powder sample was placed on a quartz low-background slide. Powder X-ray diffraction was carried out at the Australian National University with a SIEMENS D501 Bragg-Brentano diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator and scintillation detector, using CuKα radiation. Scan range was 25° - 33° 2-theta, covering the aragonite, Mg-calcite, dolomite (Ca0.5Mg0.5CO3) and magnesite (MgCO3) main peaks, step size 0.02°, 2-theta, and scan speed was 1°/min. XRD scan processing used the SIEMANS software package, Diffrac-plus EVA 10. Peak interpretation followed Nash et al., [119] to determine the mol% MgCO3 of the Mg-calcite and to check for and quantify peak asymmetry attributable to the presence of higher Mg-phases.
Imaging of the crusts for the photosynthetic pigment patterns was carried out using an Olympus (Tokyo, Japan) DSX-100 opto-digital microscope with e16x zoom optics and 4 segment polarized LED ring light in the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany Microscopy Section.
Samples were supplied from existing collections or were samples used for previously published studies referenced herein, and additionally [120,121]. Samples analysed, collection details and relevant references are in S3 Table.
CCA were polished on fine sandpaper then cleaned in a sonic bath of deionised water, pH ~6–6.5, for 20–50 minutes.
S1 Table [docx] Species table.
S2 Table [docx] EDS mol% MgCO data.
S3 Table [docx] Sample collection locations and mineralogy type.
1. Adey WH, Macintyre IG. Crustose Coralline Algae: A Re-evaluation in the Geological Sciences. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1973 Mar 1;84(3):883–904.
2. Riosmena-Rodríguez R. Natural History of Rhodolith/Maërl Beds: Their Role in Near-Shore Biodiversity and Management. In: Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Nelson W, Aguirre J, editors. Rhodolith/Maërl Beds: A Global Perspective [Internet]. Springer International Publishing; 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 25]. p. 3–26. (Coastal Research Library). Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-29315-8_1
3. James NP, Wray JL, Ginsburg RN. Calcification of Encrusting Aragonitic Algae (Peyssonneliaceae): Implications for the Origin of Late Paleozoic Reefs and Cements. J Sediment Res [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2017 Aug 28];58(2). Available from: http://archives.datapages.com/data/sepm/journals/v55-58/data/058/058002/0291.htm
4. Nash MC, Russell BD, Dixon KR, Liu M, Xu H. Discovery of the mineral brucite (magnesium hydroxide) in the tropical calcifying alga Polystrata dura (Peyssonneliales, Rhodophyta). J Phycol. 2015 Jun 1;51(3):403–7. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12299 26986657
5. Dutra E, Koch M, Peach K, Manfrino C. Tropical crustose coralline algal individual and community responses to elevated pCO2 under high and low irradiance. ICES J Mar Sci. 2016 Mar 1;73(3):803–13.
6. Cabioch J, Giraud G. Structural aspects of biomineralization in the coralline algae (calcified Rhodophyceae). In: Biomineralization in lower plants and animals. 1986. p. 141–56.
7. Ries JB. Mg fractionation in crustose coralline algae: Geochemical, biological, and sedimentological implications of secular variation in the Mg/Ca ratio of seawater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2006 Feb 15;70(4):891–900.
8. Nash MC, Troitzsch U, Opdyke BN, Trafford JM, Russell BD, Kline DI. First discovery of dolomite and magnesite in living coralline algae and its geobiological implications. Biogeosciences. 2011 Nov 15;8(11):3331–40.
9. Adey WH. Review—Coral Reefs: Algal Structured and Mediated Ecosystems in Shallow, Turbulent, Alkaline Waters. J Phycol. 1998 Jun 1;34(3):393–406.
10. Nash MC. Assessing ocean acidification impacts on the reef building properties of crustose coralline algae [Doctorate]. [Canberra, Australia]: Australian National University; 2016.
11. Goreau TF. Calcium Carbonate Deposition by Coralline Algae and Corals in Relation to Their Roles as Reef-Builders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 May 1;109(1):127–67.
12. Littler MM, Doty MS. Ecological Components Structuring the Seaward Edges of Tropical Pacific Reefs: The Distribution, Communities and Productivity of Porolithon. J Ecol. 1975;63(1):117–29.
13. Adey WH. Coral Reef Morphogenesis: A Multidimensional Model. Science. 1978 Nov 24;202(4370):831–7. doi: 10.1126/science.202.4370.831 17752443
14. Adey WH, Halfar J, Williams B. The Coralline Genus Clathromorphum Foslie emend. Adey. Biological, Physiological, and Ecological Factors Controlling Carbonate Production in an Arctic-Subarctic Climate Archive. Smithson Inst Sch Press. 2013;40 : 1–39.
15. Amado-Filho GM, Maneveldt G, Manso RCC, Marins-Rosa BV, Pacheco MR, Guimaraes S. Structure of rhodolith beds from 4 to 55 meters deep along the southern coast of Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Cienc Mar. 2007 Dec 4;33(4):399–410.
16. Harvey AS, Harvey RM, Merton E. The distribution, significance and vulnerability of Australian rhodolith beds: a review. Mar Freshw Res. 2016 May 16;68(3):411–28.
17. Darrenougue N, De Deckker P, Eggins S, Payri C. Sea-surface temperature reconstruction from trace elements variations of tropical coralline red algae. Quat Sci Rev. 2014 Jun 1;93 : 34–46.
18. Kamenos NA, Cusack M, Moore PG. Coralline algae are global palaeothermometers with bi-weekly resolution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008 Feb 1;72(3):771–9.
19. Foster M. RHODOLITHS: BETWEEN ROCKS AND SOFT PLACES. J Phycol. 2001;37 : 659–67.
20. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG. Variation in algal assemblages on wave-exposed rocky shores in New South Wales. Mar Freshw Res. 1998 Jul 21;49(3):241–54.
21. Bussell JA, Lucas IAN, Seed R. Patterns in the invertebrate assemblage associated with <span class = “italic”>Corallina officinalis in tide pools. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 2007 Apr;87(2):383–8.
22. Fisher K, Martone PT. Field Study of Growth and Calcification Rates of Three Species of Articulated Coralline Algae in British Columbia, Canada. Biol Bull. 2014 Apr 1;226(2):121–30. doi: 10.1086/BBLv226n2p121 24797094
23. Halfar J, Steneck R, Schöne B, Moore GWK, Joachimski M, Kronz A, et al. Coralline alga reveals first marine record of subarctic North Pacific climate change. Geophys Res Lett. 2007 Apr 1;34(7):L07702.
24. Williams B, Halfar J, Steneck RS, Wortmann UG, Hetzinger S, Adey W, et al. Twentieth century δ13C variability in surface water dissolved inorganic carbon recorded by coralline algae in the northern North Pacific Ocean and the Bering Sea. Biogeosciences. 2011 Jan 24;8(1):165–74.
25. Chan P, Halfar J, Adey W, Hetzinger S, Zack T, Moore GWK, et al. Multicentennial record of Labrador Sea primary productivity and sea-ice variability archived in coralline algal barium. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2017 Jun 1;8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461504/
26. Sletten HR, Andrus CFT, Guzmán HM, Halfar J. Re-evaluation of using rhodolith growth patterns for paleoenvironmental reconstruction: An example from the Gulf of Panama. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2017 Jan 1;465, Part A:264–77.
27. Ries JB. Skeletal mineralogy in a high-CO2 world. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2011 Jul 15;403(1–2):54–64.
28. Hofmann LC, Yildiz G, Hanelt D, Bischof K. Physiological responses of the calcifying rhodophyte, Corallina officinalis (L.), to future CO2 levels. Mar Biol. 2012 Apr 1;159(4):783–92.
29. Egilsdottir H, Noisette F, Noël LM-LJ, Olafsson J, Martin S. Effects of pCO2 on physiology and skeletal mineralogy in a tidal pool coralline alga Corallina elongata. Mar Biol. 2013 Aug 1;160(8):2103–12.
30. Diaz-Pulido G, Nash MC, Anthony KRN, Bender D, Opdyke BN, Reyes-Nivia C, et al. Greenhouse conditions induce mineralogical changes and dolomite accumulation in coralline algae on tropical reefs. Nat Commun. 2014 Feb 12;5 : 3310. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4310 24518160
31. Fietzke J, Ragazzola F, Halfar J, Dietze H, Foster LC, Hansteen TH, et al. Century-scale trends and seasonality in pH and temperature for shallow zones of the Bering Sea. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015 Mar 10;112(10):2960–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419216112 25713385
32. Kamenos NA, Perna G, Gambi MC, Micheli F, Kroeker KJ. Coralline algae in a naturally acidified ecosystem persist by maintaining control of skeletal mineralogy and size. Proc R Soc B. 2016 Oct 12;283(1840):20161159. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1159 27733544
33. Lewis B, Kennedy EV, Diaz-Pulido G. Seasonal growth and calcification of a reef-building crustose coralline alga on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017;568 : 73–86.
34. Johnson MD, Moriarty VW, Carpenter RC. Acclimatization of the Crustose Coralline Alga Porolithon onkodes to Variable pCO2. PLOS ONE. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087678 24505305
35. Hurd CL, Cornwall CE, Currie K, Hepburn CD, McGraw CM, Hunter KA, et al. Metabolically induced pH fluctuations by some coastal calcifiers exceed projected 22nd century ocean acidification: a mechanism for differential susceptibility? Glob Change Biol. 2011 Oct 1;17(10):3254–62.
36. Cornwall CE, Boyd PW, McGraw CM, Hepburn CD, Pilditch CA, Morris JN, et al. Diffusion Boundary Layers Ameliorate the Negative Effects of Ocean Acidification on the Temperate Coralline Macroalga Arthrocardia corymbosa. PLOS ONE. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097235 24824089
37. Hofmann LC, Koch M, Beer D de. Biotic Control of Surface pH and Evidence of Light-Induced H+ Pumping and Ca2+-H+ Exchange in a Tropical Crustose Coralline Alga. PLOS ONE. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159057 27459463
38. Nash MC, Adey W. Anatomical structure overrides temperature controls on magnesium uptake—calcification in the arctic/subarctic coralline algae Leptophytum laeve and Kvaleya epilaeve (Rhodophyta; Corallinales). Biogeosciences. 2018;15(3),781–795.
39. Nash MC, Adey W. Multiple phases of mg-calcite in crustose coralline algae suggest caution for temperature proxy and ocean acidification assessment: lessons from the ultrastructure and biomineralisation in Phymatolithon (Rhodophyta, Corallinales). J Phycol. 2017;53(5),970–984. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12559 28671731
40. Cornwall CE, Comeau S, McCulloch M. Coralline algae elevate pH at the site of calcification under ocean acidification. Glob Change Biol. 2017;00 : 1–12.
41. Chisholm JRM. Primary productivity of reef-building crustose coralline algae. Limnol Oceanogr. 2003;48(4):1376–87.
42. Borowitzka MA, Larkum AWD. Calcification in the Green Alga HalimedaIII. THE SOURCES OF INORGANIC CARBON FOR PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND CALCIFICATION AND A MODEL OF THE MECHANISM OF CALCIFICATION. J Exp Bot. 1976 Oct 1;27(5):879–93.
43. Borowitzka MA. Calcification in aquatic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1984;7 : 457–66.
44. Lee D, Carpenter SJ. Isotopic disequilibrium in marine calcareous algae. Chem Geol. 2001 Feb 15;172(3–4):307–29.
45. Borowitzka MA. Photosynthesis and calcification in the articulated coralline red algae Amphiroa anceps and A. foliacea. Mar Biol. 1981 Apr 1;62(1):17–23.
46. Adey WH, Sperapani CP. The biology of Kvaleya epilaeve, a new parasitic genus and species of Corallinaceae. Phycologia. 1971 Mar 1;10(1):29–42.
47. Adey W, Masaki T, Akioka H. Ezo epiyessoense, A New Parasitic Genus and Species of Corallinaceae. Phycologia. 1974;13 : 329–44.
48. Halfar J, Adey WH, Kronz A, Hetzinger S, Edinger E, Fitzhugh WW. Arctic sea-ice decline archived by multicentury annual-resolution record from crustose coralline algal proxy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013 Dec 3;110(49):19737–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313775110 24248344
49. Adey W, Hernandez-Kantun J, Gabrielson P, Nash M, Hayek L. Phymatolithon (Melobesioideae, Hapalidiales) in the Boreal-Subarctic transition zone of the North Atlantic: a correlation of plastid DNA markers with morpho-anatomy, ecology and biogeography. Smithson Inst Sch Press. 2017;In press:Forthcoming.
50. McCulloch M, Falter J, Trotter J, Montagna P. Coral resilience to ocean acidification and global warming through pH up-regulation. Nat Clim Change. 2012 Aug;2(8):623–7.
51. Cohen AL, McConnaughey TA. Geochemical Perspectives on Coral Mineralization. Rev Mineral Geochem. 2003 Jan 3;54(1):151–87.
52. Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagès C, Furla P, Houlbrèque F, Puverel S, Reynaud S, et al. Biomineralisation in reef-building corals: from molecular mechanisms to environmental control. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 2004 Oct 1;3(6):453–67.
53. Von Euw S, Zhang Q, Manichev V, Murali N, Gross J, Feldman LC, et al. Biological control of aragonite formation in stony corals. Science. 2017 Jun 2;356(6341):933–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6371 28572387
54. Wanamaker AD Jr., Hetzinger S, Halfar J. Reconstructing mid - to high-latitude marine climate and ocean variability using bivalves, coralline algae, and marine sediment cores from the Northern Hemisphere. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2011 Mar 1;302(1–2):1–9.
55. de Nooijer LJ, Spero HJ, Erez J, Bijma J, Reichart GJ. Biomineralization in perforate foraminifera. Earth-Sci Rev. 2014 Aug;135 : 48–58.
56. Gross E, Wernberg T, Terrados J. What is a plant? and what is aquatic botany? Aquat Bot. 2016;132(3–4).
57. Bolton JJ. What is aquatic botany?—And why algae are plants: The importance of non-taxonomic terms for groups of organisms. Aquat Bot. 2016 Jul 1;132(Supplement C):1–4.
58. Adey WH. The Genus Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Main. Hydrobiologia. 1964;24(1–2):377–420.
59. Adey W. The Genus Clathromorphum in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia. 1965;26 : 539–73.
60. Adey WH, Chamberlain YM, Irvine LM. An Sem-Based Analysis of the Morphology, Anatomy, and Reproduction of Lithothamnion Tophiforme (esper) Unger (corallinales, Rhodophyta), with a Comparative Study of Associated North Atlantic Arctic/Subarctic Melobesioideae1. J Phycol. 2005 Oct 1;41(5):1010–24.
61. Steneck RS. The Ecology of Coralline Algal Crusts: Convergent Patterns and Adaptative Strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1986;17(1):273–303.
62. Matty PJ, Johansen HW. A histochemical study of Corallina officinalis (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae). Phycologia. 1981 Mar 1;20(1):46–55.
63. Harvey AS, Woelkerling WJ, Millar A. The Genus Amphiroa (Lithophylloideae, Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Temperate Coasts of the Australian Continent, Including the Newly Described A. klochkovana. Phycologia. 2009 Jul 6;48(4):258–90.
64. Borowitzka MA, Larkum AWD, Nockolds CE. A scanning electron microscope study of the structure and organization of the calcium carbonate deposits of algae. Phycologia. 1974 Sep 1;13(3):195–203.
65. Stanley SM, Ries JB, Hardie LA. Low-magnesium calcite produced by coralline algae in seawater of Late Cretaceous composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15323–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232569499 12399549
66. Evert RF. Esau’s Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development. John Wiley & Sons; 2006. 624 p.
67. Nakano Y, Yamaguchi M, Endo H, Rejab NA, Ohtani M. NAC-MYB-based transcriptional regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in land plants. Front Plant Sci [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Feb 19];6. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00288/abstract
68. Campbell N, Reece J, Mitchell L. Biology. 5th ed. CA: Benjamin Cummings; 1999. 570 p.
69. Diotallevi F, Mulder B. The Cellulose Synthase Complex: A Polymerization Driven Supramolecular Motor. Biophys J. 2007 Apr 15;92(8):2666–73. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.099473 17237206
70. Tsekos I. The Sites of Cellulose Synthesis in Algae: Diversity and Evolution of Cellulose-Synthesizing Enzyme Complexes. J Phycol. 1999 Aug 1;35(4):635–55.
71. Popper Z, Gurvan M, Herve Cecile, Domozych David S., Willats William G. T., Tuohy Maria G., et al. Evolution and Diversity of Plant Cell Walls: From Algae to Flowering Plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62(1):567–90.
72. Paredez AR, Somerville CR, Ehrhardt DW. Visualization of Cellulose Synthase Demonstrates Functional Association with Microtubules. Science. 2006 Jun 9;312(5779):1491–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1126551 16627697
73. Rafsanjani A, Stiefel M, Jefimovs K, Mokso R, Derome D, Carmeliet J. Hygroscopic swelling and shrinkage of latewood cell wall micropillars reveal ultrastructural anisotropy. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Jun 6;11(95):20140126. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0126 24671938
74. Mellerowicz EJ, Sundberg B. Wood cell walls: biosynthesis, developmental dynamics and their implications for wood properties. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Jun;11(3):293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.003 18434240
75. Martone PT, Estevez JM, Lu F, Ruel K, Denny MW, Somerville C, et al. Discovery of Lignin in Seaweed Reveals Convergent Evolution of Cell-Wall Architecture. Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 27;19(2):169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.031 19167225
76. Buchanan B, Gruissem W, Jones R. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants edited by Buchanan Bob B., Gruissem Wilhelm, Jones Russell L. Second. UK: Wiley and Sons; 2015.
77. Cosgrove D. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nature. 2005;6 : 850–61.
78. Cole KM, Sheath RG. Biology of the Red Algae. Cambridge University Press; 1990. 530 p.
79. Bilan MI, Usov AI. Polysaccharides of Calcareous Algae and Their Effect on the Calcification Process. Russ J Bioorganic Chem. 2001 Jan 1;27(1):2–16.
80. Martone PT, Navarro DA, Stortz CA, Estevez JM. Differences in Polysaccharide Structure Between Calcified and Uncalcified Segments in the Coralline Calliarthron Cheilosporioides (corallinales, Rhodophyta)1. J Phycol. 2010 Jun 1;46(3):507–15.
81. Navarro DA, Ricci AM, Rodríguez MC, Stortz CA. Xylogalactans from Lithothamnion heterocladum, a crustose member of the Corallinales (Rhodophyta). Carbohydr Polym. 2011 Mar 17;84(3):944–51.
82. Malagoli BG, Cardozo FTGS, Gomes JHS, Ferraz VP, Simões CMO, Braga FC. Chemical characterization and antiherpes activity of sulfated polysaccharides from Lithothamnion muelleri. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014 May;66 : 332–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.02.053 24608026
83. Okazaki M, Furuya K, Tsukayama K, Nisizawa K. Isolation and Identification of Alginic Acid from a Calcareous Red Alga Serraticardia maxima. Bot Mar. 2009;25(3):123–32.
84. Rees DA, Welsh EJ. Secondary and Tertiary Structure of Polysaccharides in Solutions and Gels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1977 Apr 1;16(4):214–24.
85. Rahman MA, Halfar J. First evidence of chitin in calcified coralline algae: new insights into the calcification process of Clathromorphum compactum. Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 22;4 : 6162. doi: 10.1038/srep06162 25145331
86. Barbosa MA, Granja PL, Barrias CC, Amaral IF. Polysaccharides as scaffolds for bone regeneration. ITBM-RBM. 2005 Jun;26(3):212–7.
87. Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Manivasagan P, Kang K-H, Kim S-K. Alginate composites for bone tissue engineering: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015 Jan;72 : 269–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.008 25020082
88. Venkatesan J, Lowe B, Anil S, Manivasagan P, Kheraif AAA, Kang K-H, et al. Seaweed polysaccharides and their potential biomedical applications. Starch—Stärke. 2015 May 1;67(5–6):381–90.
89. Stoppel WL, Ghezzi CE, McNamara SL, Iii LDB, Kaplan DL. Clinical Applications of Naturally Derived Biopolymer-Based Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):657–80. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1206-2 25537688
90. Shen X L. Shamshina J, Berton P, Gurau G, Rogers R D. Hydrogels based on cellulose and chitin: fabrication, properties, and applications. Green Chem. 2016;18(1):53–75.
91. Granja PL, Ribeiro CC, Jéso BD, Baquey C, Barbosa MA. Mineralization of regenerated cellulose hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001 Sep 1;12(9):785–91. 15348225
92. Märtson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, Saukko P. Biocompatibility of Cellulose Sponge with Bone. Eur Surg Res. 1998 Dec 9;30(6):426–32. doi: 10.1159/000008609 9838236
93. de Araújo Júnior AM, Braido G, Saska S, Barud HS, Franchi LP, Assunção RMN, et al. Regenerated cellulose scaffolds: Preparation, characterization and toxicological evaluation. Carbohydr Polym. 2016 Jan 20;136 : 892–8. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.066 26572426
94. Cox TE, Nash M, Gazeau F, Déniel M, Legrand E, Alliouane S, et al. Effects of in situ CO2 enrichment on Posidonia oceanica epiphytic community composition and mineralogy. Mar Biol. 2017 Apr 9;5(164):1–16.
95. Gregg JM, Bish DL, Kaczmarek SE, Machel HG. Mineralogy, nucleation and growth of dolomite in the laboratory and sedimentary environment: A review. Sedimentology. 2015 Oct 1;62(6):1749–69.
96. Zhang F, Xu H, Shelobolina ES, Konishi H, Converse B, Shen Z, et al. The catalytic effect of bound extracellular polymeric substances excreted by anaerobic microorganisms on Ca-Mg carbonate precipitation: Implications for the “dolomite problem.” Am Mineral. 2015;100(2–3):483–94.
97. Nash MC, Martin S, Gattuso J-P. Mineralogical response of the Mediterranean crustose coralline alga Lithophyllum cabiochae to near-future ocean acidification and warming. Biogeosciences. 2016 Nov 1;13(21):5937–45.
98. Halfar J, Steneck RS, Joachimski M, Kronz A, Wanamaker AD. Coralline red algae as high-resolution climate recorders. Geology. 2008 Jun 1;36(6):463–6.
99. Raz S, Weiner S, Addadi L. Formation of High-Magnesian Calcites via an Amorphous Precursor Phase: Possible Biological Implications. Adv Mater. 2000 Jan 1;12(1):38–42.
100. Zhang F, Xu H, Konishi H, Shelobolina ES, Roden E. Polysaccharide-catalyzed nucleation and growth of disordered dolomite: A potential precursor of sedimentary dolomite. Am Mineral. 2012;97(4):556–67.
101. Merk V, Chanana M, Keplinger T, Gaan S, Burgert I. Hybrid wood materials with improved fire retardance by bio-inspired mineralisation on the nano - and submicron level. Green Chem. 2015;17(3):1423–8.
102. Weiner S, Dove PM. An Overview of Biomineralization Processes and the Problem of the Vital Effect. Rev Mineral Geochem. 2003 Jan 3;54(1):1–29.
103. Addadi L, Weiner S. Biomineralization: mineral formation by organisms. Phys Scr. 2014;89(9):098003.
104. Mass T, Drake JL, Haramaty L, Kim JD, Zelzion E, Bhattacharya D, et al. Cloning and Characterization of Four Novel Coral Acid-Rich Proteins that Precipitate Carbonates In Vitro. Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 17;23(12):1126–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.007 23746634
105. Mass T, Giuffre AJ, Sun C-Y, Stifler CA, Frazier MJ, Neder M, et al. Amorphous calcium carbonate particles form coral skeletons. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017 Aug 28;201707890.
106. Lewis B, Diaz-Pulido G. Suitability of three fluorochrome markers for obtaining in situ growth rates of coralline algae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2017 May 1;490 : 64–73.
107. Wegst UGK, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO. Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater. 2015 Jan;14(1):23–36. doi: 10.1038/nmat4089 25344782
108. van de Locht R, Slater TJA, Verch A, Young JR, Haigh SJ, Kröger R. Ultrastructure and Crystallography of Nanoscale Calcite Building Blocks in Rhabdosphaera clavigera Coccolith Spines. Cryst Growth Des. 2014 Apr 2;14(4):1710–8.
109. Leung JYS, Russell BD, Connell SD. Mineralogical Plasticity Acts as a Compensatory Mechanism to the Impacts of Ocean Acidification. Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Mar 7;51(5):2652–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04709 28198181
110. Belcher AM, Wu XH, Christensen RJ, Hansma PK, Stucky GD, Morse DE. Control of crystal phase switching and orientation by soluble mollusc-shell proteins. Nature. 1996 May 2;381(6577):56–8.
111. Donald HK, Ries JB, Stewart JA, Fowell SE, Foster GL. Boron isotope sensitivity to seawater pH change in a species of Neogoniolithon coralline red alga. Geochim Cosmochim Acta [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703717305021
112. Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, et al. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):681–6. doi: 10.1038/nature04095 16193043
113. Nash MC, Opdyke BN, Troitzsch U, Russell BD, Adey WH, Kato A, et al. Dolomite-rich coralline algae in reefs resist dissolution in acidified conditions. Nat Clim Change. 2013 Mar;3(3):268–72.
114. Cornwall CE, Hepburn CD, McGraw CM, Currie KI, Pilditch CA, Hunter KA, et al. Diurnal fluctuations in seawater pH influence the response of a calcifying macroalga to ocean acidification. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 7;280(1772):20132201.
115. Cornwall CE, Revill AT, Hurd CL. High prevalence of diffusive uptake of CO2 by macroalgae in a temperate subtidal ecosystem. Photosynth Res. 2015 May 1;124(2):181–90. doi: 10.1007/s11120-015-0114-0 25739900
116. de Carvalho RT, Salgado LT, Amado Filho GM, Leal RN, Werckmann J, Rossi AL, et al. Biomineralization of calcium carbonate in the cell wall of Lithothamnion crispatum (Hapalidiales, Rhodophyta): correlation between the organic matrix and the mineral phase. J Phycol. 2017 Mar 1;n/a–n/a.
117. Hernández-Carmona G, Hernández-Garibay E.Conventional and alternative technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides. Woodhead Publishing Limited,; 2013.
118. Ragazzola F, Foster LC, Jones CJ, Scott TB, Fietzke J, Kilburn MR, et al. Impact of high CO2 on the geochemistry of the coralline algae Lithothamnion glaciale. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016 Feb 8 [cited 2017 Mar 11];6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4744931/
119. Nash MC, Opdyke BN, Wu Z, Xu H, Trafford JM. Simple X-Ray Diffraction Techniques To Identify MG Calcite, Dolomite, and Magnesite In Tropical Coralline Algae and Assess Peak Asymmetry. J Sediment Res. 2013 Dec 1;83(12):1085–99.
120. Kata A, Baba M, Suda S. Revisions of the Mastophoroideae (corallinales, Rhodophyta) and Polyphyly in Nongeniculate Species Widely Distributed on Pacific Coral Reefs. J Phycol. 2011;47(3):662–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00996.x 27021995
121. Adey W. H. The genera Lithothamnium, Leptophytum (nov.gen.) and Phymatolithon in the gulf of Main. Hydrobiologia. 1966 Dec 1;28(3–4):321–70.
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte se
Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.
