Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum

English version

Autoři: Colin Klein ^aff001; Peter Clutton ^aff001; Adam G. Dunn ^aff002
Působiště autorů: School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia ^aff001; Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia ^aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225098

Souhrn

Many individuals who engage with conspiracy theories come to do so through a combination of individual and social factors. The interaction between these factors is challenging to study using traditional experimental designs. Reddit.com is a large connected set of online discussion forums, including one (r/conspiracy) devoted to wide-ranging discussion of conspiracy theories. The availability of large datasets of user comments from Reddit give a unique opportunity to observe human behavior in social spaces and at scale. Using a retrospective case control study design, we analyzed how Reddit users who would go on to engage with a conspiracy-related forum differed from other users in the language they use, differences in the social environments where they posted, and potential interactions between the two factors. Together, the analyses provide evidence for self-selection into communities with a shared set of interests which can feed into a conspiratorial world-view, and that these differences are detectable relative to controls even before users begin to post in r/conspiracy. We also suggest that survey-based and experimental studies may benefit from differentiating between passive private endorsement by individuals and active engagement with conspiracy theories in social spaces.

Klíčová slova:

Aggression – Emotions – Internet – Language – Personality – Psycholinguistics – Social theory – Terrorism

Zdroje

1. Byford J. Beyond belief: The social psychology of conspiracy theories and the study of ideology. In: Antaki C, Condor S, editors. Rhetoric Ideology and Social Psychology: Essays in Honour of Michael Billig. London: Routledge; 2014. pp. 83–93.

2. Byford J, Billig M. The emergence of antisemitic conspiracy theories in Yugoslavia during the war with NATO. Patterns of Prejudice. 2001; 35(4): 50–63.

3. Goertzel T. Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology. 1994; 15: 731–742. doi: 10.2307/3791630

4. Ross MW, Essien EJ, Torres I. Conspiracy beliefs about the origin of HIV/AIDS in four racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2006; 41(3): 342–344. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000209897.59384.52 16540935

5. Williams J. PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.

6. Jolley D, Douglas KM. The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology. 2014; 105(1): 35–56. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12018 24387095

7. Jolley D, Douglas KM. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(2): e89177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 24586574

8. Oliver JE, Wood T. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014; 174(5): 817–818. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190 24638266

9. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(10): e75637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 24098391

10. Simmons WP, Parsons S. Beliefs in conspiracy theories among African Americans: A comparison of elites and masses. Social Science Quarterly. 2005; 86(3): 582–598.

11. Wood MJ. Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology. 2017; 108(3): 507–527. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12231 28677916

12. Enders AM, Smallpage SM. On the measurement of conspiracy beliefs. Research & Politics. 2018; 5(1): 2053168018763596.

13. van Prooijen JW, Van Vugt M. Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on psychological science. 2018; 13(6): 770–788. doi: 10.1177/1745691618774270 30231213

14. McCauley C, Jacques S. The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979; 37(5): 637–644.

15. Keeley BL. Of conspiracy theories. Journal of Philosophy. 1999; 96: 109–126. doi: 10.2307/2564659

16. Vitriol JA, Marsh JK. The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2018; 48(7): 955–969.

17. van Prooijen JW, Douglas KM, De Inocencio C. Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European journal of social psychology. 2018; 48(3): 320–335. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2331 29695889

18. Hofstadter R. The paranoid style in American politics. Harper’s magazine. 1964; 229(1374): 77–86.

19. Abalakina-Paap M, Stephan WG, Craig T, Gregory WL. Beliefs in Conspiracies. Political Psychology. 1999; 20(3): 637–647.

20. Whitson JA, Galinsky AD. Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science. 2008; 322(5898): 115–117. doi: 10.1126/science.1159845 18832647

21. Swami V, Furnham A, Smyth N, Weis L, Lay A, Clow A. Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; 99: 72–76.

22. Miller S. Conspiracy theories: public arguments as coded social critiques: a rhetorical analysis of the TWA flight 800 conspiracy theories. Argumentation and Advocacy. 2002; 39(1): 40–56.

23. Swami V. Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology. 2012; 3 (280).

24. Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Furnham A. Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2010; 24(6): 749–761.

25. Thomas SB, Quinn SC. The tuskegee syphilis study, 1932 to 1972: implications for hiv education and aids risk education programs in the black community. American journal of public health. 1991; 81(11): 1498–1505. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.11.1498 1951814

26. Jones JH. Bad blood: The tuskegee syphilis experiment. NY: Simon & Schuster; 1993.

27. Bogart LM, Thorburn S. Are hiv/aids conspiracy beliefs a barrier to hiv prevention among african americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2005; 38(2): 213–218. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200502010-00014 15671808

28. Barron D, Morgan K, Towell T, Altemeyer B, Swami V. Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014; 70: 156–159.

29. Darwin H, Neave N, Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011; 50(8): 1289–1293.

30. Freeman D, Bentall RP. The concomitants of conspiracy concerns. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2017; 52(5): 595–604. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4 28352955

31. Robins RS, Post JM. Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1999.

32. Young TJ. Cult violence and the identity movement. Cultic Studies Journal. 1990; 7: 150–159.

33. Raab MH, Ortlieb SA, Auer N, Guthmann K, Carbon CC. Thirty shades of truth: Conspiracy theories as stories of individuation, not of pathological delusion. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4(406): 1–9.

34. Paul LA. Transformative experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

35. Lantian A, Muller D, Nurra C, Douglas KM. I know things they don’t know! Social Psychology. 2017; 48(3): 160–173.

36. Franks B, Bangerter A, Bauer MW, Hall M, Noort MC. Beyond “monologicality”? exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in psychology. 2017; 8, 861. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861 28676768

37. Brotherton R, French CC, Pickering AD. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in psychology. 2013; 4, 279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 23734136

38. Bruder M, Haffke P, Neave N, Nouripanah N, Imhoff R. Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology. 2013; 4, 225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 23641227

39. Swami V., Coles R., Stieger S., Pietschnig J., Furnham A., Rehim S., & Voracek M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443–463. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x 21751999

40. Wood MJ, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2012; 3(6): 767–773.

41. Sutton RM, Douglas KM. Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In: van Prooijen JW, van Lange PAM, editors. Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of their Leaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 254–272.

42. van der Linden S. The conspiracy-effect: exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 87, 171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045

43. Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X. Group formation in large social networks. In: Ungar L, Craven M, Gunopulos D, Eliassi-Rad T, editors. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining—KDD’06, New York, NY: ACM; 2006. pp. 44–54.

44. Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Cichocka A. The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2017; 26(6), 538–542. doi: 10.1177/0963721417718261 29276345

45. Binning KR, Sherman DK. Categorization and communication in the face of prejudice: When describing perceptions changes what is perceived. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2011; 101(2): 321. doi: 10.1037/a0023153 21463076

46. Bantimaroudis P. “chemtrails” in the sky: Toward a group-mediated delusion theory. Studies in Media and Communication. 2016; 4(2): 23–31.

47. Centola D, Gonzlez-Avella JC, Eguíluz VM, San Miguel M. Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2007; 51(6): 905–929.

48. Holme P, Newman ME. Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. Physical Review E. 2006; 74(5): 056108.

49. Coman A, Momennejad I, Drach RD, Geana A. Mnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(29): 8171–8176.

50. Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018; 359(6380): 1146–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559 29590045

51. Sunstein CR, Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2009; 17: 202–227.

52. Doris JM. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

53. Allport GW. Pattern and growth in personality. Oxford, England: Holt, Reinhart & Winston; 1961.

54. Funder DC. Persons, situations, and person-situation interactions. In: John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA, editors. Handbook of Personality, New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 658–580.

55. Buss DM. Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1987; 53(6): 1214–1221. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1214 3320336

56. Emmons RA, Diener E, Larsen RJ. Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. Journal of Personality and social Psychology. 1986; 51(4): 815–826.

57. Bakeman R, Gottman JM. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

58. Gundogdu D, Finnerty AN, Staiano J, Teso S, Passerini A, Pianesi F, et al. Investigating the association between social interactions and personality states dynamics. Royal Society open science. 2017; 4(9): 170194. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170194 28989732

59. Sherman RA, Rauthmann JF, Brown NA, Serfass DG, Jones AB. The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2015; 109(5): 872–888. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000036 25915131

60. Frederickx S, Hofmans J. The role of personality in the initiation of communication situations. Journal of Individual Differences. 2014; 35(1): 30–37.

61. Rauthmann JF, Sherman RA, Nave CS, Funder DC. Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality. 2015; 55: 98–111.

62. Klein C, Clutton P, Polito V. Topic modeling reveals distinct interests within an online conspiracy forum. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018; 9: 189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00189 29515501

63. Gosling SD, Mason W. Internet Research in Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 2015; 66(1): 877–902.

64. Halevy A, Norvig P, Pereira F. The unreasonable effectiveness of data. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2009; 24(2): 8–12.

65. Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(3): 554–559.

66. Del Vicario M, Vivaldo G, Bessi A, Zollo F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Quattrociocchi W. Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:3 7825.

67. Quattrociocchi W, Caldarelli G, Scala A. Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence. Scientific reports. 2014; 4, 4938. doi: 10.1038/srep04938 24861995

68. Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science. 2010; 329(5996): 1194–1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231 20813952

69. Weng L, Menczer F, Ahn YY. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports. 2013; 3, 2522. doi: 10.1038/srep02522 23982106

70. Zhang J, Hamilton W, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J. Community identity and user engagement in a multi-community landscape. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 2017; Retrieved from https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15706

71. Cheng J, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Leskovec J. How community feedback shapes user behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2014; 1405.1429.

72. Zhang J, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Sauper C, Taylor SJ. Characterizing online public discussions through patterns of participant interactions. In: Karahalios K, Monroy-Hernandez A, Lampinen A, Fitzpatrick G, editors. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW); 2018. 198.

73. Choi D, Han J, Chung T, Ahn Y.-Y, Chun B.-G, Kwon T. Characterizing conversation patterns in Reddit: From the perspectives of content properties and user participation behaviors. In Sharma A, editor. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks, New York, NY: ACM; 2015. pp. 233–243.

74. Mohan S, Guha A, Harris M, Popowich F, Schuster A, Priebe C. The impact of toxic language on the health of reddit communities. In Mouhab M, Langlais P, editors. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 30th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 10233, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 51–56.

75. Nithyanand R, Schaffner B, Gill P. Online Political Discourse in the Trump Era. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2017; 1711.05303.

76. Saleem HM, Dillon KP, Benesch S, Ruths D. A web of hate: Tackling hateful speech in online social spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2017; 1709.10159.

77. Cole JR, Ghafurian M, Reitter D. Is word adoption a grassroots process? An analysis of Reddit communities. In: Lee F, Lin Y-R, Osgood N, Thomson R, editors. Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling (10th International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation), Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 236–241.

78. Volske M, Potthast M, Syed S, Stein B. Mining Reddit to Learn Automatic Summarization. Proceedings of the Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 2017; pp. 59–63.

79. Benkler Y, Faris R, Roberts H. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

80. Zannettou S, Caulfield T, De Cristofaro E, Kourtelris N, Leontiadis I, Sirivianos M, et al. The web centipede: understanding how web communities influence each other through the lens of mainstream and alternative news sources. In: Uhlig S, Maenel O, editors. Proceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference New York, NY: ACM. 2017; pp. 405–417.

81. Samory M, Mitra T. Conspiracies online: User discussions in a conspiracy community following dramatic events. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/view/17907

82. Yarkoni T. Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of research in personality. 2010; 44(3): 363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001 20563301

83. Haber EM. On the stability of online language features: How much text do you need to know a person? arXiv preprint arXiv. 2015; 1504.06391.

84. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology. 2010; 29(1): 24–54.

85. Niculae V, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C. Conversational markers of constructive discussions. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2016; 1604.07407.

86. Tan C, Niculae V, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Lee L. Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee; 2016. pp. 613–624.

87. Samory M, Mitra T. ‘the government spies using our webcams’: The language of conspiracy theories in online discussions. In: Karahalios K, Monroy-Hernandez A, Lampinen A, Fitzpatrick G, editors. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 152; 2018.

88. Fast E, Chen B, Bernstein MS. Empath: Understanding topic signals in large-scale text. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2016. 4647–4657.

89. Fast E, Chen B, Bernstein MS. Lexicons on demand: neural word embeddings for large-scale text analysis. In: Sierra S, editor. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ijcai.org; 2017. pp. 4836–4840.

90. Mathew B, Kumar N, Goyal P, Mukherjee A, et al. Analyzing the hate and counter speech accounts on twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018; 1812.02712.

91. Ribeiro MH, Calais PH, Santos YA, Almeida VA, Meira Jr W. " Like Sheep Among Wolves": Characterizing Hateful Users on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2017; 1801.00317.

92. Ribeiro MH, Calais PH, Santos YA, Almeida VA, Meira Jr W. Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018; 1803.08977.

93. Ottoni R, Cunha E, Magno G, Bernadina P, Meira Jr W, Almeida V. Analyzing right-wing youtube channels: Hate, violence and discrimination. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science New York, NY: ACM; 2018. pp. 323–332.

94. Caetano JA, Magno G, Cunha E, Meira Jr W, Marques-Neto HT, Almeida V. Characterizing the public perception of whatsapp through the lens of media. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018; 1808.05927.

95. Cunha E, Magno G, Caetano J, Teixeira D, Almeida V. Fake news as we feel it: perception and conceptualization of the term “fake news” in the media. In Staab S, Koltsova O, Ignatov IG, editors. International Conference on Social Informatics, Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 151–166.

96. Lin Z, Salehi N, Yao B, Chen Y, Bernstein MS. Better when it was smaller? community content and behavior after massive growth. In ICWSM; 2017. 132–141.

97. Sekulić I, Gjurković M, Šnajder J. Not just depressed: Bipolar disorder prediction on reddit. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics; 2018.

98. Levandowsky M, Winter D. Distance between sets. Nature. 1971; 234(5323): 34–35.

99. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 2008; 10. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008

100. Swami V, Barron D, Weis L, Voracek M, Stieger S, Furnham A. An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PloS One. 2017; 12(2): e0172617 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172617 28231266

101. Byford J. Conspiracy Theory and Antisemitism. In: Conspiracy Theories. Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK; 2011. pp. 95–119.

102. Wood MJ, Douglas KM. “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4: 409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409 23847577

103. Wood MJ, Douglas KM. Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in psychology. 2015; 6: 836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836 26136717

104. Alfano M, Carter JA, Cheong M. Technological seduction and self-radicalization. Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 2018; 4(3): 298–322.

105. Gaffney D, Matias JN. Caveat Emptor, Computational Social Science: Large-Scale Missing Data in a Widely-Published Reddit Corpus. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13(7): e0200162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200162 29979741

106. Gilbert R, Thadani V, Handy C, Andrews H, Sguigna T, Sasso A, et al. The psychological functions of avatars and alt (s): A qualitative study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 32: 1–8.

107. Haimson OL, Brubaker JR, Dombrowski L, Hayes GR. Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2016. pp. 2895–2907.

108. De Choudhury M, Kiciman E, Dredze M, Coppersmith G, Kumar M. Discovering Shifts to Suicidal Ideation from Mental Health Content in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ‘16, 2098–2110. New York, NY: ACM; 2016. pp. 2098–2110.

109. De Choudhury M, Counts S, Horvitz E. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2013. pp. 3267–3276.

Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz