How do and could clinical guidelines support patient-centred care for women: Content analysis of guidelines

English version

Autoři: Anna R. Gagliardi ^aff001; Courtney Green ^aff002; Sheila Dunn ^aff003; Sherry L. Grace ^aff004; Nazilla Khanlou ^aff004; Donna E. Stewart ^aff001
Působiště autorů: University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ^aff001; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ^aff002; Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ^aff003; York University and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ^aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224507

Souhrn

Objectives

Patient-centred care (PCC) improves multiple patient and health system outcomes. However, many patients do not experience PCC, particularly women, who are faced with disparities in care and outcomes globally. The purpose of this study was to identify if and how guidelines address PCC for women (PCCW).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Guideline Clearing House, and guideline developer websites for publicly-available, English-language guidelines on depression and cardiac rehabilitation, conditions with known gendered inequities. We used summary statistics to report guideline characteristics, clinical topic, mention of PCC according to McCormack’s framework, and mention of women’s health considerations. We appraised guideline quality with the AGREE II instrument.

Results

A total of 27 guidelines (18 depression, 9 cardiac rehabilitation) were included. All 27 guidelines mentioned at least one PCC domain (median 3, range 1 to 6), most frequently exchanging information (20, 74.1%), making decisions (20, 74.1%), and enabling patient self-management (21, 77.8%). No guidelines fully addressed PCC: 9 (50.0%) of 18 depression guidelines and 3 (33.3%) of 9 cardiac rehabilitation guidelines addressed 4 or more PCC domains. Even when addressed, guidance was minimal and vague. Among 14 (51.9%) guidelines that mentioned women’s health, most referred to social determinants of health; none offered guidance on how to support women impacted by these factors, engage women, or tailor care for women. These findings pertained even to women-specific guidelines. Reported use or type of guideline development process/system did not appear to be linked with PCCW content. Based on quality appraisal with AGREE II, guidelines were either not recommended or recommended with modifications. In particular, the stakeholder involvement AGREE II domain was least addressed, but guidelines that scored higher for stakeholder involvement also appeared to better address PCCW.

Implications

This research identified opportunities to generate guidelines that achieve PCCW. Strategies include employing a PCC framework, considering gender issues, engaging women on guideline-writing panels, and including patient-oriented tools in guidelines. Primary research is needed to establish what constitutes PCCW.

Klíčová slova:

Canada – Cardiac rehabilitation – Database searching – Depression – Global health – Treatment guidelines – United States – Women's health

Zdroje

1. Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9: 100–103. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239 21403134

2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001. Available from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm/Quality%20Chasm%202001%20%20report%20brief.pdf Cited February 6 2019.

3. Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70: 351–379. doi: 10.1177/1077558712465774 23169897

4. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2012;3: e001570.

5. Stewart M, Ryan BL, Bodea C. Is patient-centred care associated with lower diagnostic costs? Healthc Policy. 2011;6: 27–31.

6. Constand MK, MacDermid JC, Dal Bello-Haas V, Law M. Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14: 271. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-271 24947822

7. McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams Piehota P, Nadler E, et al, Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72: 1085–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.020 21376443

8. Fowler FJ, Gerstein BS, Barry MJ. How patient centered are medical decisions? results of a national survey. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:.1215–1221. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6172 23712194

9. Women and Health. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO Press, 2009.

10. Sievert LL, Saliba M, Reher D, et al. The medical management of menopause: a four-country comparison care in urban areas. Maturitas. 2008;59:7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.11.001 18178044

11. Bennett AL, Lavie CJ, Grace SL. Cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome in women. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19:.57. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0559-x 28624885

12. UN Women. Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, 2018. Available from: http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/2/gender-equality-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development-2018. Cited February 6, 2019.

13. Ontario Women’s Health Framework. Toronto, ON: Echo: Improving Women’s Health in Ontario, 2011. Available from: no longer available online.

14. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ. 2010;182: e839–842. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449 20603348

15. Shekelle P, Woolf S, Grimshaw JM, Schünemann HJ, Eccles MP. Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development. Implement Sci. 2012;7: 62. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-62 22762242

16. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC. Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? a systematic review of guideline applicability. BMJ Open. 2015;5: e007047 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007047 25694459

17. Chen Z, Hong Y, Liu N, Zhang Z. Quality of critical care clinical practice guidelines: assessment with AGREE II instrument. J Clin Anesth. 2018;51: 40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.08.011 30092459

18. Appenteng R, Nelp T, Abdelgadir J, Weleldij N, Haglund M, Smith E, et al. A systematic review and quality analysis of pediatric traumatic brain injury clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0201550 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201550 30071052

19. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62: 107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x 18352969

20. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15: 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 16204405

21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072

22. Women’s Health Surveillance Report. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2003. Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/CPHI_WomensHealth_e.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

23. Bierman S (editor). Project for an Ontario Women’s Health Evidence-based Report (POWER) study report. Toronto, ON: POWER Study, 2012. Available from: http://www.powerstudy.ca. Cited February 6, 2019.

24. Fourth World Conference on Women. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO Press, 1995. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/Beijing%20full%20report%20E.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

25. Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient-centeredness—a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9: e107828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107828 25229640

26. Zill JM, Scholl I, Härter M, Dirmaier J. Which dimensions of patient-centeredness matter?—results of a web-based expert delphi survey. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0141978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141978 26539990

27. Joffres M, Jaramillo A, Dickinson J, Lewin G, Pottie K, Shaw E, et al. Recommendations on screening for depression in adults. CMAJ. 2013;185: 775–782. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130403 23670157

28. BC Reproductive Mental Health Program & Perinatal Services, Best practice guidelines for mental health disorders in the perinatal period. British Columbia: BC Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, 2014. Available from: http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/Documents/Guidelines-Standards/Maternal/MentalHealthDisordersGuideline.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

29. Toward Optimized Practice (TOP) MS in Depression Working Group. Identification and management of depression in multiple sclerosis. Edmonton, AB: Toward Optimized Practice, 2015. Available from: http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/download/1898/Depression%20in%20MS%20CPG.pdf?_20160210112124. Cited February 6, 2019.

30. BC Guidelines.ca. Major depressive disorder in adults: Diagnosis and management. British Columbia: BC Ministry of Health, 2013. Available from: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/practitioner-pro/bc-guidelines/depression_full_guideline.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

31. Austin MP, Highet N. Mental health care in the perinatal period: Australian clinical practice guideline. Canberra, AU: Centre of Perinatal Excellence, 2017. Available from: http://cope.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Final-COPE-Perinatal-Mental-Health-Guideline.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

32. Howell D, Keshavarz H, Esplen MJ, Hack T, Hamel M, Howes J, et al. Pan-Canadian practice guideline: Screening, assessment and management of psychosocial distress, depression and anxiety in adults with cancer. Toronto, ON: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 2015. Available from: https://www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca/db-sage/sage20161035/. Cited February 6, 2019.

33. Malhi GS, Bassett D, Boyce P, Bryant R, Fitzgerald PB, Fritz K, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Mood Disorders. Aus N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49: 1–185.

34. Registered Nurse's Association of Ontario. Delirium, dementia, and depression in older adults: assessment and care. Toronto, ON: RNAO, 2016. Available from: https://rnao.ca/sites/rnao-ca/files/bpg/RNAO_Delirium_Dementia_Depression_Older_Adults_Assessment_and_Care.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

35. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments. Clinical guidelines for management of adults with major depressive disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61; 506–603. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659061 27486152

36. Li M, Kennedy EB, Byrne N, Gerin-Lajoie C, Green E, Katz MR, et al. Cancer Care Ontario. The management of depression in patients with cancer. Toronto, ON: Cancer Care Ontario, 2015. Available from: https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/content/management-depression-patients-cancer. Cited February 6, 2019.

37. Qaseem A, Barry MJ, Kansagara D. Nonpharmacologic versus pharmacologic treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164: 350–359. doi: 10.7326/M15-2570 26857948

38. Gelenberg AJ, Freeman MP, Markowitz JC, Rosenbaum JF, Thase ME, Trivedi MH, et al. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. American Psychiatric Association, 2010. Available from: https://psychiatryonline.org/pb/assets/raw/sitewide/practice_guidelines/guidelines/mdd.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

39. Price D, McCabe D, Pham CN, Stone EG, Pousson T. Diagnosis and treatment of depression in adults: clinical practice guideline. Kaiser Permanente, 2012. Available from: http://www.providers.kaiserpermanente.org/info_assets/cpp_cod/cod_depression_guideline_0712.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

40. Trangle M, Gursky J, Haight R, Hardwig J, Hinnenkamp T, Kessler D, et al. Adult Depression in Primary Care. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, 2016. Available from: https://www.icsi.org/guideline/depression/. Cited February 6, 2019.

41. Siu AL, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Baumann LC, Davidson KW, Ebell M, et al. Screening for depression in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016;315:380–387. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18392 26813211

42. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of perinatal mood disorders. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2012. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign127_update.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

43. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Common mental health disorders—Identification and pathways to care. London: NICE, 2011. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg123/resources/common-mental-health-problems-identification-and-pathways-to-care-pdf-35109448223173. Cited February 6, 2019.

44. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management. London: NICE, 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90/resources/depression-in-adults-recognition-and-management-pdf-975742638037. Cited February 6, 2019.

45. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson LJ, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. American Heart Association. Circulation. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women-2011 update. A guideline from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123: 1243–1262. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8 21325087

46. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Colvin MM, et al. Heart Failure Society of America. ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Cardiol Fail. 2017;23:628–651.

47. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic heart failure in adults: management. London: NICE, 2010. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg108. Cited February 6, 2019.

48. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of chronic heart failure. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2016. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign147.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

49. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Cardiac rehabilitation. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2017. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign150.pdf. Cited February 6, 2019.

50. Steinke EE, Jaarsma T, Barnason SA, Byrne M, Doherty S, Dougherty CM et al. Counselling for individuals with cardiovascular disease and their partners: a consensus document from the American Heart Association and the ESC Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP). Eur Heart J. 2013;34: 3217–3235. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht270 23900695

51. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C, Cifkova R, Ferreira R, et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32: 3147–3197. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218 21873418

52. Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, Atrey A, Campbell N, Derman W, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings. Heart. 2016;102: 1449–1455. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309209 27181874

53. Grace SL, Turk-Adawi KI, Contractor A, Atrey A, Campbell NRC, Derman W, et al. International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings: an International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation consensus statement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;59: 303–322.

54. Smith SC Jr, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, Braun LT, Creager MA, Franklin BA, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58: 2432–2446. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824 22055990

55. Wiig S, Aase K, von Plessen C, Burnett S, Nunes F, Weggelaar AM, et al. Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality' is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14: 478. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-478 25303933

56. Gauld R, Burgers J, Dobrow M, Minhas R, Wendt C, Cohen AB, et al. Healthcare system performance improvement. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28: 2–20. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2013-0057 24783663

57. Lingner H, Burger B, Kardos PA, Criee CP, Worth H, Hummers-Pradier E. What patients really think about asthma guidelines: barriers to guideline implementation form the patients’ perspective. BMC Pulmonary Med. 2017;17: 13.

58. Mercuri M, Sherbino J, Sedran RJ, Frank JR, Gafni A, Norman G. When guidelines don’t guide: The effect of patient context on management decisions based on clinical practice guidelines. Acad Med. 2015;90: 191–196. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000542 25354075

59. Goodman SM, Miller AS, Turgunbaev M, Guyatt G, Yates A, Springer B, et al, Clinical practice guidelines: Incorporating input from a patient panel. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69: 1125–1130.

60. Franekel L, Miller AS, Clayton K, Crow-Hercher R, Hazel S, Johnson B, et al. When patients write the guidelines: patient panel recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68: 26–35.

61. Cronin RM, Mayo-Gamble TL, Stimpson SJ, Badawy SM, Crosby LE, Byrd J, et al. Adapting medical guidelines to be patient- centered using a patient-driven process for individuals with sickle cell disease and their caregivers. BMC Hematol. 2018;18: 12. doi: 10.1186/s12878-018-0106-3 29977566

62. Sleath B, Carpenter DM, Slota C, Williams D, Tudor G, Yeatts K, et al. Communication during pediatric asthma visits and self-reported asthma medication adherence. Pediatrics. 2012;130: 627–633. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0913 22945409

63. Schaefer C, Knaapen L and the G-I-N PUBLIC Steering Committee. G-I-N Public Toolkit: Patient and public involvement in guidelines. Guidelines International Network, 2015. Available from: https://www.g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/g-i-n-public/toolkit/toolkit-2015. Cited February 6, 2019.

64. Armstrong MJ, Rueda JD, Gronseth GS, Mullins CD. Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement. Health Expect. 2016;20: 3–10. doi: 10.1111/hex.12467 27115476

65. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6: 26. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-26 21426574

66. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC. Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicability. BMJ Open. 2015;5: e007047. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007047 25694459

67. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Bhattacharyya OK. A framework of the desirable features of guideline implementation tools (GItools): Delphi survey and assessment of GItools. Implement Sci. 2014;9: 98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0098-8 25091091

68. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Bhattacharyya OK. The development of guideline implementation tools: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2015;3: e127–33. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140064 25844365

69. Liang L, Abi Safi J, Gagliardi AR. Number and type of guideline implementation tools varies by guideline, clinical condition, country of origin, and type of developer organization: content analysis of guidelines. Implement Sci. 2017;12: 136. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0668-7 29141649

70. Vernooij RW, Wilson M, Gagliardi AR. Characterizing patient-oriented tools that could be packaged with guidelines to promote self-management and guideline adoption: a meta-review. Implement Sci. 2016;11: 52. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0419-1 27079375

71. Park M, Giap TT, Lee M, Jeong H, Jeong M, Go Y, Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: A review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;87: 69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006 30056169

72. Strobino DM, Grason H, Minkovitz C. Charting a course for the future of women's health in the United States: concepts, findings and recommendations. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54: 839–848. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00113-7 11999497

73. Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran M, Arreola-Ornelas H, et al. Women and health: the key for sustainable development. Lancet. 2015;386: 1165–1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60497-4 26051370

74. Gagliardi AR, Dunn S, Foster A, Grace SL, Green CR, Khanlou N, et al. How is patient-centred care addressed in women’s health? A theoretical rapid review. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e026121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026121 30765411

How do and could clinical guidelines support patient-centred care for women: Content analysis of guidelines

Souhrn

Objectives

Methods

Results

Implications

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz