Molecular epidemiological characteristics of dengue virus carried by 34 patients in Guangzhou in 2018
Authors:
Feng Liao aff001; Huini Chen aff002; Jieliang Xie aff003; Shaofeng Zhan aff004; Pan Pan aff005; Zizhao Lao aff006; Yaohua Fan aff004; Lupin Lin aff007; Yanni Lai aff004; Shuangfeng Lin aff004; Jianguo Wu aff002; Xiaohong Liu aff001; Geng Li aff001
Authors place of work:
Laboratory Animal Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
aff001; Institute of Medical Microbiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
aff002; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
aff003; The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
aff004; College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
aff005; Mathematical Engineering Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
aff006; Guangzhou eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
aff007
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224676
Summary
Dengue fever is a major worldwide public health problem that, as estimated by the WHO, causes epidemics in over 100 countries, resulting in hundreds of millions of dengue virus (DENV) infections every year. In China, dengue fever mainly occurs in coastal areas. Recurring dengue outbreaks were reported by Guangdong Province almost every year since the first epidemic in 1978. DENV infections persisted in Guangzhou in consecutive years since 2000, with the dengue epidemic reaching a historical peak in 2014. Because Guangzhou is one of the largest cities for opening up in China, understanding the epidemiological characteristics of dengue fever in the city can hopefully provide a significant basis for developing effective dengue prevention strategies. In this study, a total of 34 DENV strains, including 29 DENV-1 strains and 5 DENV-2 strains, were isolated from a blood samples drawn from patients who were diagnosed with dengue fever by hospitals in Guangzhou during 2018. To explore the epidemiological characteristics of dengue fever, the envelope (E) gene obtained from the isolates was amplified for phylogenetic analysis. The results from the phylogenetic analysis showed that DENV in Guangzhou was mainly imported from Southeast Asian countries. Additionally, propagation paths based on phylogeographical analysis suggested potential local dengue transmission in Guangzhou.
Keywords:
Sequence analysis – Phylogenetics – Phylogenetic analysis – Sequence databases – China – Dengue virus – Dengue fever – Mosquitoes
Introduction
Dengue fever, also known as "break-bone fever", is an acute mosquito-borne viral disease caused by dengue virus (DENV) [1]. Patients infected with DENV can have flu-like symptoms, including a high fever, headache, and vomiting, which generally last for ten days. In a small proportion of cases, the disease develops into dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS) [2, 3]. Dengue is principally spread by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in tropical and subtropical regions where the warm and humid climate indicates favorable mosquito habitat. In other words, dengue fever is also a seasonal infectious disease, and mosquito densities and climatic conditions are strongly associated with the incidence of dengue fever. In recent decades, dengue fever, as a growing threat to human health, has presented a tremendous challenge to health service providers throughout the world [4]. According to a published study, an estimated 390 million dengue infections occur in over 100 countries every year [3, 5]. Globally, the vast majority of the world population is exposed to DENV, making dengue one of the most dangerous vector-borne viral diseases worldwide [4]. Dengue outbreaks have a devastating effect on public health and economic sectors [3]. In the stricken areas, the disease leads to a slowdown in the local economy as it inflicts a significant health burden on the population, impairs people's quality of life and impedes the development of the tourist industry. With vector management as the primary means to control and prevent DENV transmission, it should be noted that improper use of insecticides is a waste of resources and a source of environmental pollution that threatens both human and environmental health [6, 7]. So it is important to know the structure of dengue virus.
DENV, as a member of the genus Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae, is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus. The DENV genome is approximately 11,000 nucleotides in length and encodes three structural proteins, namely, the capsid (C), premembrane (prM), and envelope (E) proteins, and seven nonstructural (NS) proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B and NS5) in a single open reading frame (ORF). Specifically, the 5' end of the DENV genome encodes the C/prM/E proteins, while the 3' end encodes the seven NS protein[8]. There are five DENV serotypes, which are referred to as DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4, and the distinctions between these serotypes are based on their antigenicity. Additionally, different serotypes can be further differentiated into different genotypes[9].
In fact, as early as 1978, a case of imported dengue fever was discovered in Xiamen, after which the Chinese mainland has experienced multiple dengue epidemics in the past few decades [10]. In addition to the coastal provinces in Southeast China and Taiwan that are mainly affected by the disease, an increasing geographic expansion to the inland is noted as the global climate changes [10, 11]. Guangdong Province has been declared a severe epidemic area by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as it has been frequently attacked by dengue fever since the first outbreak [12]. Despite the absence of reported dengue fever cases between 1982 and 1984, 1988 and 1989, and in 1994, 1996, and 1998, the disease has been a constant threat in Guangdong Province [13]. In Guangzhou, the capital city of Guangdong Province, dengue incidence, regardless of the number of DENV infections, has been reported every year since 2000 [14]. In 2014, Guangdong Province experienced its worst dengue outbreak on record, during which different DENV serotypes were detected in the DENV-infected patients [12, 15]. There were over 46000 dengue fever cases notified nationwide throughout the year, including up to 45230 cases and 76 imported cases reported by Guangdong Province, which exceeds the cumulative number of infections between 1990 and 2013 [14, 16].
DENV infections are simply classified as imported and autochthonous cases according to patients' recent travel records. Dengue epidemics refer to continued widespread outbreaks of dengue fever in areas where DENV affects a large population and is transmitted between people by the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. To date, there are no other DENV foci in mainland China, except for the reported natural focus in Yunnan Province [17]. As a result of rapid economic growth, thriving tourism, and the greenhouse effect, there were many patients infected with dengue fever in Guangdong Province, and a serious outbreak occurred in 2014. [18, 19]. The endemicity of dengue in Guangzhou has been heatedly discussed [20]. A previous study based on phylogenetic analysis suggested the presence of local dengue transmission in Guangzhou [10]. In the present study, DENV strains were isolated from blood samples drawn from DENV-infected patients who were diagnosed with dengue fever by hospitals in Guangzhou during 2018. We described the epidemiological characteristics of isolated DENV based on phylogenetic reconstruction and analysis using a dataset comprised of DENV sequences downloaded from the GenBank database and those obtained from genome sequencing.
Materials and methods
1. Sample collection
In this study, all patient samples were approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine and Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients had fever > 37.5°C for less than 72 h. Anti-dengue IgM and IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were used to confirm dengue infection [21]. A total of 170 samples suspected of having dengue fever occurred during the 2018 outbreak. 55 blood samples were determined to be positive samples by hospital diagnosis.
Oral informed consent was obtained from all patients who were involved in this study.
2. Virus isolation, RNA extraction and serotyping
Dengue virus was isolated from 55 positive blood samples. To increase virus titer, each patient's serum was inoculated into an Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell line cultured in MEM with 10% FBS (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and diluted 1:40 in fresh MEM. Next, the medium was added to C6/36 cells and incubated at 30°C for 2 h. Then, the residual inoculum was replaced with fresh MEM containing 2% FBS; the cells were maintained at 30°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 5 to 7 days (until significant cytopathic effects (CPE) occurred). Simultaneously, the supernatants were collected for RNA extraction after centrifugation at 4000 rpm. These samples were stored at -80°C until needed.
Viral RNA was extracted from 200 μl of each supernatant using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) as instructed by the manufacturer. Then, the RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by reverse transcriptase at 37°C for 90 min and then at 70°C for 10 min. DENV serotyping was carried out by multiplex RT-PCR [22].
3. Sequencing
Using RNA as templates, RT-PCR was performed to amplify the envelope (E) gene. DENV-1 primers were designed for sequencing based on the DENV-1 standard Hawaii strain (GenBank accession number: KM204119) and DENV-2 strain (GenBank accession number: KM279569) [10, 22]. E gene sequences of 34 strains were obtained from the patient samples. The primers used in this article are listed in Tables 1 and 2. These sequences were uploaded to the GenBank database, and their IDs, i.e., the GenBank accession numbers of the sequences, are listed in Table 3.
4. Dataset
In the dataset, the new isolates and the sequences of DENV-1 and DENV-2 available from the GenBank database were aligned and adjusted using MAFFT v7.308 [23] and Aliview to remove those without a sampling date or geographic location (The length of the E gene sequence is 1485). Recombination Detection Program (RDP v4.36) was employed in recombination analysis with a wide range of recombination detection methods, including RDP, Chi-maera, BootScan, 3Seq, GENECONV, MaxChi, and SiScan [24]. To avoid redundancy, CD-HIT-EST (http://weizhongli-lab.org/cdhit_suite/cgi-bin/index.cgi?cmd=cd-hit-est) was used to group sequences from outside China into clusters, with the nucleotide identity threshold of 100% [25]. A single sequence was randomly chosen from each cluster as a representative of all sequences that shared the same sampling date and geographic location.
5. Phylogenetic signal assessment and nucleotide substitution model selection
The accuracy of phylogenetic inference based on the nucleotide sequence dataset is subject to the saturation level of the phylogenetic signal. Substitution saturation is a crucial factor because a phylogenetic tree becomes meaningless if the aligned sequences in the dataset lose phylogenetic information due to substitution saturation. In the present study, the substitution saturation level of each dataset was assessed with DAMBE and Xia's test method [26].
Models of nucleotide substitution allow for the calculation of probabilities of change between nucleotides along the branches of a phylogenetic tree. On this basis, we used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select a best-fit model and created a maximum-likelihood tree (ML tree) with the model. Additionally, a maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree was generated using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for model selection. The best-fit models of nucleotide substitution were estimated with JModeltest v2.1.7 [27]. Subsequently, the IQ-TREE [28] was employed to determine the best-fit models since a massive quantity of sequences were deposited in a global dataset, which was beyond the capacity of JModeltest.
6. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction
In search of more information about the samples, we set up a global dataset that involved all samples and the DENV-1 and DENV-2 sequences available from the GenBank, except those being removed from the database as redundant sequences. Furthermore, ML trees were constructed with best-fit models in RAxML v8.0.9 [29], while the reliability of topology was evaluated using bootstrap values derived from 1000 repetitions. The ML trees were visualized with FigTree v1.4.2.
7. Phylogeographic analyses
According to the ML trees obtained from the global dataset, the newly isolated sample sequences in the DENV-1 and DENV-2 datasets were divided into different clusters (with the classification of clusters based on bootstrap values and the number of 70% as a cut-off for a "reliable" branch). A sample sequence was selected from each cluster for nucleotide BLAST on the NCBI web server, and 100 DENV sequences were downloaded from each BLAST run. On this basis, the sample sequence of Cluster III was set to match 1000 sequences to gather more biological information. The downloaded sequences and the samples were combined together and divided into four datasets for comparison on the MAFFT web server. Phylogenetic signals of these datasets were detected as described above.
Each dataset was analyzed with TempEst v1.5 to investigate its temporal signal and "clocklikeness" of ML phylogenies before applying the assumption of a molecular clock into the phylogenetic analysis [30]. ML trees generated by RAxML were inputted, and the sample dates of the sequences were defined. After estimation of the best-fitting root, a linear regression was performed on the root-to-tip distances of samples versus the date of the isolate, and significant outliers (sequences) were rejected as they did not fit into the assumption of the molecular clock.
The spatial diffusion of the time-scaled genealogy was modeled as a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) process with the program BEAST v1.8.3 [31]. The diffusion process along the phylogenies of the datasets for BLAST was estimated using the Bayesian stochastic search variable selection (BSSVS) procedure. The uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock (ULRC) method was adopted to produce phylogenetic estimates. In addition, we chose a Bayesian skyline coalescent model to review the demographic history and ran the Bayesian MCMC chain for a bulk number of iterations to ensure process convergence. The BEAGLE package was used to speed up the calculation process [32]. The effective sample size (ESS) was calculated using TRACER [33], with all parameters showing ESS values > 200 after burn-in in the initial 10% iterations. The MCC tree was summarized using TreeAnnotator v1.8.2 at the burn-in rate of 10% and was visualized with FigTree v1.4. SPREAD v1.0.6 is used to generate the propagation path map. Import the files generated by the BEAST software into the SPREAD software, set the latitude and longitude of the location, and set the BF value to 3, and then generate the corresponding path map.
8. Group average distance calculation
We differentiated the DENV-1 and DENV-2 data sets based on genotypes. In order to avoid the impact of old viruses on genetic distance calculation, we only extracted the genotypes of sequence samples from Guangdong Province in the past five years. The MEGA software was used to compare sample sequences of different clusters and compare them to sequences not in the cluster.
Result
1. Sample information and serotypes
In 2018, a total of 170 blood samples were provided by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and 34 strains of dengue viruses were obtained from these blood samples, including 29 strains of DENV-1 and 5 strains of DENV-2. After gel electrophoresis analysis, the RT-PCR products were sequenced and uploaded to the GenBank database to obtain accession numbers. Details are shown in Fig 1 and Table 3. The original image of agarose gel electrophoresis is shown in S1 Fig.
2. Phylogenetic signal assessment
The substitution saturation level of each dataset of the DENV E gene was assessed with DAMBE. The results of the assessment indicated that no subset experienced full substitution saturation.
3. Phylogenetic analysis and molecular clock tests
Obviously, the sample sequences were classified in independent clusters with high bootstrap values (70–100%), indicating robust support for the tree topology. DENV-1 was used to construct 3529 sequences of ML tree, and 3542 of DENV-2. From the ML tree of the global dataset, the sample sequences positive for DENV-1 were divided into three clusters, and the DENV-2 positive sample sequences were grouped into two clusters (for detailed clustering results, see Fig 2, Fig 3 and Table 1). Molecular clock tests were performed on the basis of the ML trees. A stable temporal structure was observed as the linear regression on the root-to-tip distances versus the data suggested a relatively high fitting degree, and R2 had a positive value, which enabled further study of the evolutionary process. The molecular clock detection maps are displayed on the corresponding MCC maps.
4. Ancestral reconstruction and discrete paleogeography analysis
All sample sequences were clearly clustered into one branch (with the classification of branches based on posterior probabilities and the number of 0.8 and higher as trustworthy). In this study, all sample sequences in the first, second, and third clusters belonged to DENV-1. According to the MCC tree reconstructed from Cluster I, the 17 isolates were clustered in one branch (posterior probability = 0.9985), which is the same as the Thailand and Taiwanese 2015 sequences (posterior probability = 0.9998). Our paleogeography analysis results showed that the sample virus originated in Taiwan. In 2015, the virus affected the region radically and was later imported into Guangzhou between 2015 and 2018. The MCC tree of Cluster II indicated that the sample sequences were clustered in the branch (accession: MG767211) with a sequence obtained from Guangzhou in 2017 (posterior probability = 0.9999), with no other clusters in the same branch. The results from the paleogeography analysis suggested that Guangzhou was the location where the most recent common ancestor was found, while an earlier ancestor appeared in Singapore. The MCC tree of Cluster III suggested that the sample sequences were clustered in the same branch with the Taiwanese 2015 and 2016 sequences, as well as the cluster of the Singaporean 2016 sequences (posterior probability = 0.9992). Through paleogeography analysis, the sample virus might be spread along a propagation path and imported into Guangzhou from Taiwan in 2018 or before. The fourth and fifth clusters belonged to DENV-2. As shown in the MCC tree of Cluster IV, the sample sequences were clustered in the same branch with the Malaysian 2013 sequence (posterior probability = 0.9999), indicating that the most recent ancestor of the sample sequences emerged from Malaysia. According to the propagation path map, the sample virus entered Guangzhou during 2013–2018. The MCC tree of Cluster V suggested that the sample sequences were clustered in the same branch with the Indian 2015 sequences and the Taiwanese 2015 sequence cluster (posterior probability = 0.8465). According to the propagation path, the sample virus was imported into Guangzhou during 2015–2018. It is difficult to infer a highly accurate propagation path as no more sequences are available from the GenBank database. The propagation path map of all sample viruses is included in Fig 4. The MCC trees are shown in Figs 5–9.
5. Average genetic distance comparison
The five sample clusters were compared with the genetic distances of the same genotype in clusters in 2014–2018. It can be seen from the table that the sequence of the DENV-2 two-cluster sample collected in this study differs greatly from the sequence of the same genotype. The sequence differences between other sample clusters and the same genotype are small. The data is presented in Table 4.
Discussion
In the present study, blood samples were drawn from DENV-infected patients who were diagnosed with dengue fever by hospitals in Guangzhou during 2018, and an analysis was performed on the DENV strains isolated from these blood samples. Through gel electrophoresis analysis, the isolated sequences were classified into two serotypes, namely, DENV-1 and DENV-2. Furthermore, DENV-1 strains were divided into three clusters, and the DENV-2 strains were divided into two clusters according to the ML trees. The ancestral reconstruction analysis showed that the sample sequences largely originated from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan. This suggests that the dengue virus that we are popular in Guangzhou is still based on input. As the capital city of Guangdong Province and the trade center in Southeast China, Guangzhou is exposed to a relatively high risk of the disease, as DENV may enter the city along with imported goods and migrant workers. In addition, DENV continuously flows into China because Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and other Southeast Asian countries are popular destinations for Chinese tourists, especially those living in Guangdong Province. Therefore, entry-exit inspection and quarantine should be implemented effectively for dengue prevention and control. For instance, suspected and confirmed cases of DENV infection should be isolated and treated properly to reduce the risk of imported dengue fever. In addition, health education also plays an important role in dengue prevention and control. To reduce the risk of DENV infection, public health authorities should provide the necessary materials for tourists to gain a better understanding of dengue prevention and remind them not to visit an endemic area during epidemic seasons.
Interestingly, the results from the traceability analysis showed that the most recent common ancestor of the sequences of cluster II emerged from Guangzhou, and Cluster II and the Guangzhou 2017 isolate are in the same branch without any other foreign sequences. Moreover, they shared a common ancestral lineage to the Malaysian 2014 isolate, the Singaporean 2014 isolate, and the Zhongshan 2015 isolate in other branches. Phylogeographically, there are two possible propagation paths. First, the virus originated in Singapore and became an epidemic in the country before 2014; during the next year, it was imported into Zhongshan, and then in 2017, the disease flowed into Guangzhou from other cities in Guangdong Province; the Guangzhou 2018 isolates came from the virus imported into the city during 2017 as a result of local transmission. Second, the virus emerged from Singapore and was not introduced into Zhongshan until 2015; during 2017 and 2018, the virus was continuously imported into Guangzhou from Singapore or other countries and regions; the sample sequences were not clustered into a branch with the isolates from other countries because no related sequences were available in GenBank or the database had no sufficient patient isolates. Regarding the sources of spread or propagation, some DENV strains were imported from endemic countries and regions and caused dengue fever without further propagation in China; some evolved from imported strains and led to local epidemics during the year; others were localized strains after vertical transmission. Although no substantial evidence was found in this study to prove vertical transmission of DENV in Guangzhou, previous phylogenetic analyses indicated possible local transmission of dengue fever in the city.
Since Aedes albopictus is the main medium for DENV transmission, the localization of DENV largely depends on the formation of localized and virus-carrying eggs and the survival of DENV in the eggs and offspring mosquitoes through winter[34]. A previous study demonstrated that DENV can survive in eggs and spread to offspring mosquitoes. Transovarial transmission of DENV is strongly temperature-related as it determines whether the eggs and young offspring can wait out the winter season. As an example, Yunnan Province has reported the localization of DENV as it has a subtropical monsoon climate and provides a natural habitat for Aedes albopictus. Similar to Yunnan Province, Guangzhou has hot, humid summers and mild, dry winters, which create a favorable environment for the breeding of Aedes mosquitoes. Moreover, as the greenhouse effect continues to warm the planet slowly, overwintering becomes easier for mosquitoes. Peri-urban areas in Guangzhou have plenty of dirty gullies, open spaces, and rented houses that require effective management to improve the living environment. Additionally, local residents who like indoor and outdoor planting, fish farming, and water harvesting also provide places for mosquito breeding. To reduce mosquito breeding sites, effective urban sanitation management should be implemented. For example, stagnant water should be cleared in a timely manner to ensure the smooth operation and maintenance of the city's drainage system; in crowded places, mosquito prevention and control measures should be taken for the public good. Personal hygiene also plays a critical role in dengue prevention. Residents should avoid keeping fish and aquatic plants and regularly clean up stagnant water in their houses. An individual with a fever or other dengue fever-like symptoms should promptly seek medical attention. Hospitals should strive to improve the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of dengue fever. Suspected DENV-infected patients should be isolated to prevent further transmission. We should pay closer attention to localized DENV in Guangzhou and strictly implement relevant dengue prevention and control measures.
Although the results of this study implied that vertical transmission of DENV might exist in Guangzhou, there is no solid evidence supporting the inference as no adequate sequences are available for analysis. The coverage of the sequence has a great impact on the study. Patients with dengue sometimes have negative infections. The patient is not aware that the infection with dengue virus has led to a decrease in the reported sequence, and a small number of viruses have not been sequenced and uploaded to the database. These can all lead to the wrong propagation path. Therefore, local centers for disease control and prevention should work closely with disease control and prevention departments of Southeast Asian countries to observe how DENV is prevalent in these countries, thereby identifying sources of propagation for DENV in China and exploring the epidemiological characteristics of dengue fever to provide a basis for dengue prevention strategies. As the Belt and Road Initiative moves forward, Asian, European and African countries expect to increase transport connections for international trade, strengthen people-to-people exchanges and remove barriers to investment and trade. Given that, the conventional entry-exit inspection and quarantine divided by national administrative regions is falling short, leading to an increased risk of dengue and Zika fever in the countries along the Belt and Road. There is an urgent need to raise public awareness about disease prevention and control, as well as intensified measures against dengue and Zika fever. It is necessary to establish joint prevention and control mechanisms for infectious diseases so that China and other relevant countries can work together to effectively combat infectious diseases and safeguard health security with their technologies and resources.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [tif]
Original image of agarose gel electrophoresis.
S1 Table [xlsx]
The kit for diagnosing dengue patients is used in hospitals.
S2 Table [xlsx]
All accession numbers of the DENV-1 sequence used in this study.
S3 Table [xlsx]
All accession numbers of the DENV-2 sequence used in this study.
Zdroje
1. Messina JP, Brady OJ, Scott TW, Zou C, Pigott DM, Duda KA, et al. Global spread of dengue virus types: mapping the 70 year history. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(3):138–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.12.011 24468533; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3946041.
2. Chen R, Vasilakis N. Dengue—quo tu et quo vadis? Viruses. 2011;3(9):1562–608. Epub 2011/10/14. doi: 10.3390/v3091562 21994796; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3187692.
3. Endy TP, Yoon IK, Mammen MP. Prospective cohort studies of dengue viral transmission and severity of disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;338:1–13. Epub 2009/10/06. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02215-9_1 19802574.
4. Guo C, Zhou Z, Wen Z, Liu Y, Zeng C, Xiao D, et al. Global Epidemiology of Dengue Outbreaks in 1990–2015: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:317. Epub 2017/07/28. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00317 28748176; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5506197.
5. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva2009.
6. Ko HY, Li YT, Chao DY, Chang YC, Li ZT, Wang M, et al. Inter- and intra-host sequence diversity reveal the emergence of viral variants during an overwintering epidemic caused by dengue virus serotype 2 in southern Taiwan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(10):e0006827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006827 30286095; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6191158.
7. Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Harris E, et al. Approaches to refining estimates of global burden and economics of dengue. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(11):e3306. Epub 2014/11/21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003306 25412506; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4238988.
8. Qing M, Zou G, Wang QY, Xu HY, Dong H, Yuan Z, et al. Characterization of dengue virus resistance to brequinar in cell culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):3686–95. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00561-10 20606073; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2934995.
9. Niu C, Huang Y, Wang M, Huang D, Li J, Huang S, et al. Differences in the Transmission of Dengue Fever by Different Serotypes of Dengue Virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2019.2477 31503521.
10. Li G, Pan P, He Q, Kong X, Wu K, Zhang W, et al. Molecular epidemiology demonstrates that imported and local strains circulated during the 2014 dengue outbreak in Guangzhou, China. Virol Sin. 2017;32(1):63–72. doi: 10.1007/s12250-016-3872-8 28120220.
11. Lai S, Johansson MA, Yin W, Wardrop NA, van Panhuis WG, Wesolowski A, et al. Seasonal and interannual risks of dengue introduction from South-East Asia into China, 2005–2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11):e0006743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006743 30412575.
12. Chen P, Yang F, Cao W, Liu H, Zhang K, Liu X, et al. The Distribution of Different Clades of Seneca Valley Viruses in Guangdong Province, China. Virol Sin. 2018;33(5):394–401. Epub 2018/10/18. doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0056-8 30328012; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6235767.
13. Lai S, Huang Z, Zhou H, Anders KL, Perkins TA, Yin W, et al. The changing epidemiology of dengue in China, 1990–2014: a descriptive analysis of 25 years of nationwide surveillance data. BMC Med. 2015;13:100. Epub 2015/05/01. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0336-1 25925417; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4431043.
14. Zhao H, Zhang FC, Zhu Q, Wang J, Hong WX, Zhao LZ, et al. Epidemiological and Virological Characterizations of the 2014 Dengue Outbreak in Guangzhou, China. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156548. Epub 2016/06/04. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156548 27257804; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4892648.
15. Li MT, Sun GQ, Yakob L, Zhu HP, Jin Z, Zhang WY. The Driving Force for 2014 Dengue Outbreak in Guangdong, China. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166211. Epub 2016/11/20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166211 27861514; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5115708.
16. Cheng Q, Jing Q, Spear RC, Marshall JM, Yang Z, Gong P. The interplay of climate, intervention and imported cases as determinants of the 2014 dengue outbreak in Guangzhou. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(6):e0005701. Epub 2017/06/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005701 28640895; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5507464.
17. Lin Y, Ma D, Wen S, Zeng F, Hong S, Li L, et al. Molecular characterization of the viral structural gene of the first dengue virus type 1 outbreak in Xishuangbanna: A border area of China, Burma and Laos. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;79:152–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.11.370 30528395.
18. Tong MX, Hansen A, Hanson-Easey S, Xiang J, Cameron S, Liu Q, et al. Dengue control in the context of climate change: Views from health professionals in different geographic regions of China. J Infect Public Health. 2018. Epub 2019/01/05. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.12.010 30606474.
19. Sang S, Chen B, Wu H, Yang Z, Di B, Wang L, et al. Dengue is still an imported disease in China: a case study in Guangzhou. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:178–90. Epub 2015/03/17. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.005 25772205.
20. Sang S, Gu S, Bi P, Yang W, Yang Z, Xu L, et al. Predicting unprecedented dengue outbreak using imported cases and climatic factors in Guangzhou, 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003808. Epub 2015/05/29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003808 26020627; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4447292.
21. Radke EG, Gregory CJ, Kintziger KW, Sauber-Schatz EK, Hunsperger EA, Gallagher GR, et al. Dengue outbreak in Key West, Florida, USA, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(1):135–7. Epub 2012/01/20. doi: 10.3201/eid1801.110130 22257471; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3310087.
22. Yong YK, Thayan R, Chong HT, Tan CT, Sekaran SD. Rapid detection and serotyping of dengue virus by multiplex RT-PCR and real-time SYBR green RT-PCR. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(7):662–8. 17609830.
23. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80. Epub 2013/01/19. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 23329690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3603318.
24. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol. 2015;1(1):vev003. Epub 2015/05/26. doi: 10.1093/ve/vev003 27774277; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5014473.
25. Huang Y, Niu B, Gao Y, Fu L, Li W. CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(5):680–2. Epub 2010/01/08. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003 20053844; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828112.
26. Xia X, Xie Z. DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J Hered. 2001;92(4):371–3. Epub 2001/09/06. doi: 10.1093/jhered/92.4.371 11535656.
27. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9(8):772. Epub 2012/08/01. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109 22847109; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4594756.
28. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):268–74. Epub 2014/11/06. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300 25371430; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4271533.
29. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. Epub 2014/01/24. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 24451623; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3998144.
30. Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, Pybus OG. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol. 2016;2(1):vew007. Epub 2016/10/25. doi: 10.1093/ve/vew007 27774300; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4989882.
31. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214. Epub 2007/11/13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 17996036; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2247476.
32. Ayres DL, Aaron D, Zwickl DJ, Peter B, Holder MT, Lewis PO, et al. BEAGLE: an application programming interface and high-performance computing library for statistical phylogenetics. 2012.
33. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67(5):901–4. Epub 2018/05/03. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032 29718447; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6101584.
34. Guo X, Zhao T, Dong Y, Lu B. Survival and replication of dengue-2 virus in diapausing eggs of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2007;44(3):492–7. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[492:sarodv]2.0.co;2 17547236.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Antibiotika na nachlazení nezabírají! Jak můžeme zpomalit šíření rezistence?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- A 3’ UTR SNP rs885863, a cis-eQTL for the circadian gene VIPR2 and lincRNA 689, is associated with opioid addiction
- A substitution mutation in a conserved domain of mammalian acetate-dependent acetyl CoA synthetase 2 results in destabilized protein and impaired HIF-2 signaling
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF