Validation of the vignette-based German Exercise Causality Orientation Scale (G-ECOS)
Autoři:
Lena Busch aff001; Till Utesch aff001; Bernd Strauss aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg, Münster, Germany
aff001
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223643
Souhrn
The Self-Determination Theory has been applied to explain behaviour in numerous contexts and cultures. In the exercise context, causality orientations (autonomy, control, impersonal) are important to describe individual differences in initiation and maintenance of health behaviour. The assessment of exercise causality orientations can be a key element to improve predictions of motivated health and exercise behaviour. Nevertheless, a scale to measure exercise causality orientations has not been established in German yet. Thus, it was the aim of the present work to translate the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale to German and to test it throughout three studies. The German G-ECOS questionnaire was cross-validated via confirmatory factor analyses in two separate samples. Both Study 1 (n = 306, 72.60% female, age M = 26.00, SD = 5.66; CFI = .96) and Study 2 (n = 320, 70.94% female, age M = 29.00, SD = 3.54; CFI = .95) indicated a good model fits. In a further Study 3 (n = 548, 62.50% female, age M = 30.17, SD = 11.91), the relations between exercise causality orientations and other SDT related constructs were examined. The correlations indicated positive associations between autonomy causality orientation and intrinsic regulation, intrinsic exercise participation goals, and exercise basic needs satisfaction. Overall, the assessment of exercise causality orientations can be useful in analysing and potentially predicting motivated exercise behaviour.
Klíčová slova:
Behavior – Behavioral and social aspects of health – Exercise – Motivation – Psychology – Psychometrics – Questionnaires – Research validity
Zdroje
1. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(6):801–9.
2. WHO. Overweight and obesity. 2017.
3. Cavill N, Bauman A. Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: do mass media campaigns have a role? J Sports Sci. 2004 Aug;22(8):771–90. doi: 10.1080/02640410410001712467 15370487
4. Oja P, Vuori I, Paronen O. Daily walking and cycling to work: Their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33:87–94.
5. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268.
6. Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York City, NY: Guilford Publications; 2017.
7. Ng JYY, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Deci EL, Ryan RM, Duda JL, et al. Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325–40. doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309 26168470
8. Teixeira PJ, Carraça E V, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):78.
9. Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005 Jun;26(4):331–62.
10. Niemiec CP, Ryan RM. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Sch Field. 2009;7(2):133–44.
11. Ntoumanis N. A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Jun;71(2):225–42.
12. Ryan RM, Deci EL. A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Can Psychol Can. 2008;49(3):186–93.
13. Ryan RM, Patrick H, Deci EL. Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. Eur Health Psychol. 2008;10(1):2–5.
14. How YM, Whipp P, Dimmock J, Jackson B. The Effects of Choice on Autonomous Motivation, Perceived Autonomy Support, and Physical Activity Levels in High School Physical Education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2013 Apr;32(2):131–48.
15. Ntoumanis N. A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97(3):444–53.
16. Rose EA, Parfitt G, Williams S. Exercise causality orientations, behavioural regulation for exercise and stage of change for exercise: Exploring their relationships. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2005;6(4):399–414.
17. Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. Students’ Motivational Processes and Their Relationship to Teacher Ratings in School Physical Education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006 Mar;77(1):100–10. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2006.10599336 16646357
18. Vlachopoulos SP, Michailidou S. Development and Initial Validation of a Measure of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Exercise: The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2006 Sep;10(3):179–201.
19. Weman-Josefsson K, Lindwall M, Ivarsson A. Need satisfaction, motivational regulations and exercise: moderation and mediation effects. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 20;12(1):67.
20. Rose EA, Markland D, Parfitt G. The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale. J Sports Sci. 2001 Jan;19(6):445–62. doi: 10.1080/026404101300149393 11411780
21. Markland D, Tobin V. A Modification to the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire to Include an Assessment of Amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004 Jun;26(2):191–6.
22. Seelig H, Fuchs R. Messung der sport- und bewegungsbezogenen Selbstkonkordanz. Z Für Sportpsychol. 2006 Oct;13(4):121–39.
23. Wilson PM, Rogers WT, Rodgers WM, Wild TC. The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28(3):231–251.
24. Rackow P, Scholz U, Hornung R. The German Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. Swiss J Psychol. 2013 Jan;72(3):137–148.
25. Markland D, Ingledew DK. The measurement of exercise motives: Factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised Exercise Motivations Inventory. Br J Health Psychol. 1997;2(4):361–376.
26. Lehnert K, Sudeck G, Conzelmann A. BMZI–Berner Motiv- und Zielinventar im Freizeit- und Gesundheitssport. Diagnostica. 2011 Jul;57(3):146–59.
27. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J Res Personal. 1985;19(2):109–134.
28. Rose EA, Markland D, Parfitt G. The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(6):445–462. doi: 10.1080/026404101300149393 11411780
29. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J Res Personal. 1985;19(2):109–34.
30. Maier SF, Seligman ME. Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1976;105(1):3–46.
31. Lehnert K, Sudeck G, Conzelmann A. BMZI–Berner Motiv- und Zielinventar im Freizeit- und Gesundheitssport. Diagnostica. 2011 Jul;57(3):146–159.
32. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl. 1966;80(1):1–28.
33. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56(2):81–105. 13634291
34. Kenny DA, Kashy DA. Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):165–72.
35. Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70(1):123–33.
36. Schmitt M, Eid M. Richtlinien fur die Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica. 2007;53(1):1–2.
37. Soper D. A-priori sample size calculator for multiple regression. 2012. Available from: HttpwwwDanielsoperComstatcalc3calcAspx.
38. Mardia KV. Mardia’s test of multinormality. In: Kotz S, Read CB, Balakrishnan N, Vidakovic B, Johnson NL, editors. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2005.
39. Satorra A, Bentler PM. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Von Eye A, Clogg CC, editors. Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. pp. 399–419.
40. Moosbrugger H, Kelava A. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 2007.
41. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951 Sep;16(3):297–334.
42. Peters G-JY. The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale. Eur Health Psychol. 2014;16(2):56–69.
43. McDonald RP. Factor analysis and related methods. 1985.
44. McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified treatment. 2013.
45. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.
46. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.
47. Revelle WR. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. 2017.
48. Team JASP. JASP. 2018.
49. Rose EA, Parfitt G, Williams S. Exercise causality orientations, behavioural regulation for exercise and stage of change for exercise: exploring their relationships. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2005;6(4):399–414.
50. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):78.
51. Sijtsma K. On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika. 2009;74(1):107–20. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0 20037639
52. Kruyen PM, Emons WHM, Sijtsma K. On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review. Int J Test. 2013 Jul;13(3):223–48.
53. Kruyen PM, Emons WHM, Sijtsma K. Test Length and Decision Quality in Personnel Selection: When Is Short Too Short?. Int J Test. 2012 Oct;12(4):321–44.
54. Schmitt M, Eid M. Richtlinien fur die Ubersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica. 2007;53(1):1.
55. Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ. Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76(3):482. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482 10101878
56. Rackow P, Scholz U, Hornung R. The German Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale. Swiss J Psychol. 2013 Jan;72(3):137–48.
57. Jeffreys H. The theory of probability. OUP Oxford. 1998.
58. Baard PP, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(10):2045–68.
59. Edmunds J, Ntoumanis N, Duda JL. Testing a self-determination theory-based teaching style intervention in the exercise domain. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2008 Mar;38(2):375–88.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Nová metoda odlišení nádorové tkáně může zpřesnit resekci glioblastomů
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy