Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity
Autoři:
Renan Schiavolin Recio aff001; André Mascioli Cravo aff001; Raphael Yokoingawa de Camargo aff001; Virginie van Wassenhove aff002
Působiště autorů:
Centro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição (CMCC), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil
aff001; Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit CEA DRF/Joliot, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, Gif-sur-Yvette, Paris, France
aff002
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223184
Souhrn
The physical simultaneity between two events can differ from our point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). Studies using simultaneity judgments (SJ) and temporal order judgments (TOJ) tasks have shown that whether two events are reported as simultaneous is highly context-dependent. It has been recently suggested that the interval between the two events in the previous trial can modulate judgments both in SJ and TOJ tasks, an effect named rapid recalibration. In this work, we investigated rapid recalibration in SJ and TOJ tasks and tested whether centering the range of presented intervals on perceived simultaneity modulated this effect. We found a rapid recalibration effect in TOJ, but not in SJ. Moreover, we found that centering the intervals on objective or subjective simultaneity did not change the pattern of results. Interestingly, we also found no correlations between an individual’s PSS in TOJ and in SJ tasks, which corroborates other studies in suggesting that these two psychophysical measures may capture different processes.
Klíčová slova:
Analysis of variance – Curve fitting – Experimental design – Psychometrics – Psychophysics – Sensory perception – Vision – Color vision
Zdroje
1. Parise CV, Spence C, Ernst MO. When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. Current Biology. 2012;22(1):46–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.039 22177899
2. Parise CV, Ernst MO. Correlation detection as a general mechanism for multisensory integration. Nature communications. 2016;7:11543. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11543 27265526
3. Deroy O, Faivre N, Lunghi C, Spence C, Aller M, Noppeney U. The complex interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual awareness. Multisensory research. 2016;29(6-7):585–606. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002529 27795942
4. Kayser C, Shams L. Multisensory causal inference in the brain. PLoS biology. 2015;13(2):e1002075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002075 25710476
5. Rohe T, Noppeney U. Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS Biology. 2015;13(2):e1002073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073 25710328
6. Stein BE, Meredith MA. The merging of the senses. The MIT Press; 1993.
7. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2004;8(4):162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002 15050512
8. Pöppel E, Artin TT. Mindworks: Time and conscious experience. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1988.
9. Sugita Y, Suzuki Y. Audiovisual perception: Implicit estimation of sound-arrival time. Nature. 2003;421(6926):911. doi: 10.1038/421911a 12606990
10. Kopinska A, Harris LR. Simultaneity constancy. Perception. 2004;33(9):1049–1060. doi: 10.1068/p5169 15560507
11. Heron J, Whitaker D, McGraw PV, Horoshenkov KV. Adaptation minimizes distance-related audiovisual delays. Journal of Vision. 2007;7(13):5–5. doi: 10.1167/7.13.5 17997633
12. Stone J, Hunkin N, Porrill J, Wood R, Keeler V, Beanland M, et al. When is now? Perception of simultaneity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2001;268(1462):31–38. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1326
13. Zampini M, Guest S, Shore DI, Spence C. Audio-visual simultaneity judgments. Perception & psychophysics. 2005;67(3):531–544. doi: 10.3758/BF03193329
14. Raizada R, Poldrack R. Event-related fMRI of audio-visual simultaneity perception. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press five Cambridge center, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA; 2002. p. 172–172.
15. Van Wassenhove V, Grant KW, Poeppel D. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(3):598–607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001 16530232
16. Vroomen J, Keetels M. Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72(4):871–884. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.871
17. Vatakis A, Spence C. Audiovisual synchrony perception for speech and music assessed using a temporal order judgment task. Neuroscience letters. 2006;393(1):40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.032 16213656
18. Zampini M, Shore DI, Spence C. Audiovisual temporal order judgments. Experimental brain research. 2003;152(2):198–210. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1536-z 12879178
19. Zampini M, Shore DI, Spence C. Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2003;50(1-2):165–180. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00132-6 14511844
20. Van Eijk RL, Kohlrausch A, Juola JF, van de Par S. Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: effects of experimental method and stimulus type. Perception & psychophysics. 2008;70(6):955–968. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.6.955
21. Vatakis A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C. Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments. Experimental brain research. 2008;185(3):521–529. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1168-9 17962929
22. Fujisaki W, Shimojo S, Kashino M, Nishida S. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature neuroscience. 2004;7(7):773. doi: 10.1038/nn1268 15195098
23. Vroomen J, Keetels M, De Gelder B, Bertelson P. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Cognitive brain research. 2004;22(1):32–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.003 15561498
24. Kösem A, Gramfort A, van Wassenhove V. Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations. Neuroimage. 2014;92:274–284. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.010 24531044
25. Keetels M, Vroomen J. Temporal recalibration to tactile–visual asynchronous stimuli. Neuroscience letters. 2008;430(2):130–134. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.044 18055112
26. Van der Burg E, Alais D, Cass J. Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony. Journal of neuroscience. 2013;33(37):14633–14637. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1182-13.2013 24027264
27. Van der Burg E, Orchard-Mills E, Alais D. Rapid temporal recalibration is unique to audiovisual stimuli. Experimental brain research. 2015;233(1):53–59. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4085-8 25200176
28. Harvey C, Van der Burg E, Alais D. Rapid temporal recalibration occurs crossmodally without stimulus specificity but is absent unimodally. Brain Research. 2014;1585:120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.028 25148705
29. Noel JP, De Niear M, Van der Burg E, Wallace MT. Audiovisual simultaneity judgment and rapid recalibration throughout the lifespan. PloS one. 2016;11(8):e0161698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161698 27551918
30. Roseboom W. Serial dependence in timing perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2019;45(1):100–110. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000591 30596435
31. Brainard DH, Vision S. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial vision. 1997;10:433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357 9176952
32. Hill N. The Psignifit Toolbox; 2005.
33. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & psychophysics. 2001;63(8):1293–1313. doi: 10.3758/BF03194544
34. JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.9)[Computer software]; 2018. Available from: https://jasp-stats.org/.
35. Grabot L, van Wassenhove V. Time order as psychological bias. Psychological science. 2017;28(5):670–678. doi: 10.1177/0956797616689369 28485701
36. Van Eijk RL, Kohlrausch A, Juola JF, Van De Par S. Temporal order judgment criteria are affected by synchrony judgment sensitivity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72(8):2227–2235. doi: 10.3758/BF03196697
37. Murray MM, Wallace MT. The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press; 2011.
38. García Pérez MA, Alcalá Quintana R. On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2012;19(5):820–846. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0278-y
39. Pernet CR, Wilcox RR, Rousselet GA. Robust correlation analyses: false positive and power validation using a new open source Matlab toolbox. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;3:606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00606 23335907
40. Keane B, Bland NS, Matthews N, Carroll TJ, Wallis G. Rapid recalibration of temporal order judgements: Response bias accounts for contradictory results. BioRxiv. 2019; p. 576249.
41. Love SA, Petrini K, Cheng A, Pollick FE. A psychophysical investigation of differences between synchrony and temporal order judgments. PloS one. 2013;8(1):e54798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054798 23349971
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Nová metoda odlišení nádorové tkáně může zpřesnit resekci glioblastomů
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy