Biased cognition in East Asian and Western cultures
Autoři:
Jenny Yiend aff001; Julia André aff002; Louise Smith aff001; Lu Hua Chen aff003; Timothea Toulopoulou aff003; Eric Chen aff002; Pak Sham aff002; Brian Parkinson aff004
Působiště autorů:
King’s College London, London, England, United Kingdom
aff001; Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
aff002; Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
aff003; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
aff004
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223358
Souhrn
The majority of cognitive bias research has been conducted in Western cultures. We examined cross-cultural differences in cognitive biases, comparing Westerners’ and East Asians’ performance and acculturation following migration to the opposite culture. Two local (UK, Hong Kong) and four migrant (short-term and long-term migrants to each culture) samples completed culturally validated tasks measuring attentional and interpretation bias. Hong Kong residents were more positively biased than people living in the UK on several measures, consistent with the lower prevalence of psychological disorders in East Asia. Migrants to the UK had reduced positive biases on some tasks, while migrants to Hong Kong were more positive, compared to their respective home counterparts, consistent with acculturation in attention and interpretation biases. These data illustrate the importance of cultural validation of findings and, if replicated, would have implications for the mental health and well-being of migrants.
Klíčová slova:
Attention – Cognition – Cognitive psychology – Cross-cultural studies – Culture – Emotions – Mental health and psychiatry – Hong Kong
Zdroje
1. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005;1:167–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916 17716086
2. Pool E, Brosch T, Delplanque S, Sander D. Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychol Bull 2016;142(1):79–106. doi: 10.1037/bul0000026 26390266
3. Thoern HA, Grueschow M, Ehlert U, Ruff CC, Kleim B. Attentional bias towards positive emotion predicts stress resilience. PLoS ONE 2016;11(3).
4. Kress L, Aue T. Learning to look at the bright side of life: Attention bias modification training enhances optimism bias. Front Human Neurosci 2019;13.
5. Sanchez A, Vazquez C. Looking at the eyes of happiness: Positive emotions mediate the influence of life satisfaction on attention to happy faces. J Posit Psychol 2014;9(5):435–448.
6. Kleim B, Thörn HA, Ehlert U. Positive interpretation bias predicts well-being in medical interns. Front Psychol 2014;5(JUN).
7. Savulich G, Shergill SS, Yiend J. Interpretation Biases in Clinical Paranoia. Clinical Psychological Science 2017;5(6):985–1000.
8. Savulich G, Freeman D, Shergill S, Yiend J. Interpretation Biases in Paranoia. Behav Ther 2015;46(1):110–124. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.08.002 25526839
9. Peng L, Cao H-, Yu Y, Li M. Resilience and cognitive bias in chinese male medical freshmen. Front Psychiatry 2017;8(AUG):158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00158 28912733
10. Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 2007;133(1):1–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 17201568
11. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annu Rev Psychol 1994;45:25–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325 8135504
12. Yiend J. The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cogn Emot 2010;24(1):3–47.
13. Yu M, Westenberg PM, Li W, Wang J, Miers AC. Cultural evidence for interpretation bias as a feature of social anxiety in Chinese adolescents. Anxiety Stress Coping 2019;32(4):376–386. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2019.1598556 30924366
14. Lu W, Daleiden E, Lu S-. Threat perception bias and anxiety among Chinese school children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2007;36(4):568–580. doi: 10.1080/15374410701776301 18088215
15. Bleidorn W, Klimstra TA, Denissen JJA, Rentfrow PJ, Potter J, Gosling SD. Personality Maturation Around the World: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social-Investment Theory. Psychol Sci 2013;24(12):2530–2540. doi: 10.1177/0956797613498396 24142813
16. Ellefson MR, Ng FF-, Wang Q, Hughes C. Efficiency of Executive Function: A Two-Generation Cross-Cultural Comparison of Samples From Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Psychol Sci 2017;28(5):555–566. doi: 10.1177/0956797616687812 28384072
17. Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., & Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (revised and expanded 3rd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill USA; 2010.
18. Mourey JA, Oyserman D, Yoon C. One Without the Other: Seeing Relationships in Everyday Objects. Psychol Sci 2013;24(9):1615–1622. doi: 10.1177/0956797613475631 23818651
19. Eom K, Kim HS, Sherman DK, Ishii K. Cultural Variability in the Link Between Environmental Concern and Support for Environmental Action. Psychol Sci 2016;27(10):1331–1339. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660078 27565535
20. Heine SJ, Hamamura T. In search of east Asian self-enhancement. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2007;11(1):4–27. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294587 18453453
21. Chang EC, Asakawa K. Cultural Variations on Optimistic and Pessimistic Bias for Self Versus a Sibling: Is There Evidence for Self-Enhancement in the West and for Self-Criticism in the East When the Referent Group is Specified? J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84(3):569–581. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.569 12635917
22. Hamamura T, Meijer Z, Heine SJ, Kamaya K, Hori I. Approachg-avoidance motivation and information processing: A cross-cultural analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2009;35(4):454–462. doi: 10.1177/0146167208329512 19164704
23. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. J Am Med Assoc 2004;291(21):2581–2590.
24. De Vaus J, Hornsey MJ, Kuppens P, Bastian B. Exploring the East-West Divide in Prevalence of Affective Disorder: A Case for Cultural Differences in Coping With Negative Emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2018;22(3):285–304. doi: 10.1177/1088868317736222 29034806
25. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. International Migration Report 2015: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/375). 2016. Available from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf
26. Cantor-Graae E, Selten J-. Schizophrenia and migration: A meta-analysis and review. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(1):12–24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.12 15625195
27. De Leersnyder J. Emotional acculturation: a first review. Curr Opin Psychol 2017;17:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.007 28950975
28. Razani J, Burciaga J, Madore M, Wong J. Effects of acculturation on tests of attention and information processing in an ethnically diverse group. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007;22(3):333–341. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.008 17298874
29. Lester KJ, Mathews A, Davison PS, Burgess JL, Yiend J. Modifying cognitive errors promotes cognitive well being: A new approach to bias modification. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2011;42(3):298–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.001 21352718
30. Yiend J, Savulich G, Coughtrey A, Shafran R. Biased interpretation in perfectionism and its modification. Behav Res Ther 2011;49(12):892–900. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.004 22030297
31. Smith L, Leung WG, Crane B, Parkinson B, Toulopoulou T, Yiend J. Bilingual comparison of Mandarin and English cognitive bias tasks. Behav Res Methods 2018;50(1):302–312. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0871-0 28289887
32. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1996;28(1):1–11.
33. Eysenck MW, Mogg K, May J, Richards A, Mathews A. Bias in Interpretation of Ambiguous Sentences Related to Threat in Anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100(2):144–150. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.2.144 2040764
34. Wenzlaff R. M., Wegner D. M., Pennebaker J. W. The mental control of depression: Psychological obstacles to emotional well-being. In Wegner D. M. & Pennebaker J. W. editors. Handbook of mental control. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall; 1993. pp. 239–257.
35. Williams JMG, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The Emotional Stroop Task and Psychopathology. Psychol Bull 1996;122(1):3–24.
36. MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional Bias in Emotional Disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1986;95(1):15–20. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15 3700842
37. Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, second edition (WASI-II). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson; 2011.
38. Spielberger C. D., Gorsuch R. L., Lushene R., Vagg P., Jacobs G. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (form Y): self-evaluation questionnaire.: Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. 1983.
39. Shek DTL. Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1988;10(4):303–317.
40. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8(1):77–100.
41. Shek DTL. Reliability and factorial structure of the chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol 1990;46(1):35–43. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199001)46:1<35::aid-jclp2270460106>3.0.co;2-w 2303562
42. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc. 2012.
43. Woody SR, Miao S, Kellman-McFarlane K. Cultural differences in social anxiety: A meta-analysis of Asian and European Heritage samples. Asian Am J Psychol 2015;6(1):47–55.
44. Hong JJ, Woody SR. Cultural mediators of self-reported social anxiety. Behav Res Ther 2007;45(8):1779–1789. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.011 17350589
45. Miller GA, Chapman JP. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnorm Psychol 2001;110(1):40–48. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.40 11261398
46. Lee J-, Mathews A, Shergill S, Yiend J. Magnitude of negative interpretation bias depends on severity of depression. Behav Res Ther 2016;83:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.05.007 27262590
47. Yiend J, Lee J-, Tekes S, Atkins L, Mathews A, Vrinten M, et al. Modifying interpretation in a clinically depressed sample using 'cognitive bias modification-errors': A double blind randomised controlled trial. Cogn Ther Res 2014;38(2):146–159.
48. Hofstede, G. Compare Countries [cited 25 September 2019]. In: Hofstede Insights [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/
49. Calvo MG, Nummenmaa L. Perceptual and affective mechanisms in facial expression recognition: An integrative review. Cogn Emot 2016;30(6):1081–1106. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1049124 26212348
50. Yonelinas AP, Jacoby LL. The process-dissociation approach two decades later: Convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions. Mem Cognit 2012;40(5):663–680. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0205-5 22528824
51. Matheson E, Wade TD, Yiend J. Utilising cognitive bias modification to remedy appearance and self-worth biases in eating disorder psychopathology: A systematic review. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2019;65.
52. Lee J-, Mathews A, Shergill S, Yiu Chan DK, Majeed N, Yiend J. How can we enhance cognitive bias modification techniques? The effects of prospective cognition. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2015;49:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.03.007 25841654
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Nová metoda odlišení nádorové tkáně může zpřesnit resekci glioblastomů
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy