Cognitive, relational and task crafting: Spanish adaptation and analysis of psychometric properties of the Job Crafting Questionnaire
Autoři:
Onintze Letona-Ibañez aff001; Maria Carrasco aff002; Silvia Martinez-Rodriguez aff003; Alejandro Amillano aff001; Nuria Ortiz-Marques aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Social Psychology and Development, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
aff001; Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
aff002; Department of Social Pedagogy and Diversity, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223539
Souhrn
Even though classic job design theories have evolved over the years and become more focused on employees’ ability to autonomously change their job characteristics, tools to assess job crafting are still limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Job Crafting Questionnaire (JCQ), taking into account the valuable contribution made by Wrzesniewski and Dutton’s model to the understanding of the job crafting concept. The total sample consisted of 768 employees (participants’ mean age was 41.63 and 49.7% of them were women). The sample was randomly divided into two halves in order to conduct two factor analyses (Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis). Concurrent and convergent validity was assessed by computing correlations with validated questionnaires for measuring job crafting (Job Crafting Scale, JCS), engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES-9) and job burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, MBI-GS). The results indicated a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .880) which was similar to the original scale, and provided a good fit to the three-dimensional model tested. Appropriate evidence of construct validity was also shown (r = .45 with total JCS; r = .52 with total UWES-9 and r-values between -.33 and .45 with MBI dimensions). The results confirmed that the Spanish translation of the JCQ is a suitable tool for measuring job crafting and enabling practitioners and researchers to further expand the existing knowledge of this concept.
Klíčová slova:
Employment – Factor analysis – Jobs – Psychological stress – Psychology – Psychometrics – Questionnaires – Surveys
Zdroje
1. Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(2):179–201.
2. Berg JM, Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: when proactivity requires adaptivity. J Organiz Behav. 2010;31:158–86.
3. Tims M, Bakker AB. Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA J Ind Psychol. 2010;36(2):E1–E9.
4. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job Demands–Resources Theory. In: Chen PY, Cooper CL, editors. Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide, Volume III, Work and Wellbeing. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. p. 37–64
5. Demerouti E, Nachreiner F, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499–512. 11419809
6. Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. Development and Validation of the Job Crafting Scale. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(1):173–86.
7. Bruning P, Campion M. A role-resource approach-avoidance model of job crafting: a multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Acad Manage J. 2018;61(2):499–522.
8. Zhang F, Parker SK. Reorienting job crafting research: a hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. J Organ Behav. 2018;40(2):1–21.
9. Lichtenthaler PW, Fischbach A. A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2018;28(1):30–50.
10. Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. The Impact of Job Crafting on Job Demands, Job Resources, and Well-Being. J Occup Health Psych. 2013;18(2):230–40.
11. Vogt K, Hakanen JJ, Brauchli R, Jenny GJ, Bauer FB. The consequences of job crafting: a three-wave study. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2016;25(3):353–62.
12. Tims M, Bakker A, Derks D, Van Rhenen W. Job Crafting at the team and individual level: implications for work engagement and performance. Group Organ Manage. 2013;38(4):427–54.
13. Hakanen J, Seppälä J, Peeters P. High Job Demands, Still Engaged and Not Burned Out? The Role of Job Crafting. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24(4):619–27. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9638-3 28130738
14. Sakuraya A, Shimazu A, Eguchi H, Kamiyama K, Hara Y, Namba K, et al. Job crafting, work engagement, and psychological distress among Japanese employees: A cross-sectional study. BioPsychoSoc Med. 2017;11(1).
15. Lichtenthaler PW, Fischbach A. Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance. Leader Organ Dev J. 2018;39(5):620–32.
16. Slemp GR, Vella-Brodrick DA. The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. IJW. 2013;3(2):126–46.
17. Rudolph CW, Katz I, Lavigne K, Zacher H. Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. J Vocat Behav. 2017;102(C):112–38.
18. Ghitulescu BE. Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh; 2006.
19. Leana C, Appelbaum E, Shevchuk I. Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of Job crafting. Acad Manage J. 2009;52:1169–92.
20. Petrou P, Demerouti E, Peeters MC, Schaufeli WB, Hetland J. Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(8):1120–41.
21. Nielsen K, Abildgaard J. The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers. Work Stress. 2012;26(4):365–84. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.733543 23236220
22. Schachler V, Epple SD, Clauss E, Hoppe A, Slemp GR, Ziegler M. Measuring job crafting across cultures: lessons learned from comparing a german and an Australian sample. Front. Psychol. 2019;10:991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00991 31133931
23. Nielsen K, Antino M, Sanz-Vergel A, Rodríguez-Muñoz A. Validating the Job Crafting Questionnaire (JCRQ): A multi-method and multi-sample study. Work Stress. 2017;31(1):82–99.
24. Bakker AB, Ficapal-Cusí P, Torrent-Sellens J, Boada-Grau J, Hontangas-Beltrán PM. The Spanish version of the Job Crafting Scale. Psicothema. 2018;30(1):136–42. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.293 29363483
25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. SPINE. 2000;25(24):3186–91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 11124735
26. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–16.
27. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3th ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
28. Moreno-Jiménez B, Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Escobar E. La evaluación del Burnout profesional. Factorialización del MBI-GS. Un análisis preliminar. Ansiedad y Estrés. 2001;7(1):69–78.
29. Behling O, McFillen JM. Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments. Problems and Solutions. London: Sage; 2000.
30. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216.
31. Timmerman ME, Lorenzo-Seva U. Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychol Methods. 2011;16:209–20. doi: 10.1037/a0023353 21500916
32. Velicer WF. Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika. 1976;41:321–7.
33. Mardia KV. Measures of multivariate skewnees and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika. 1970;57:519–30.
34. Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. FACTOR: a computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2006;38:88–91.
35. Bentler PM. EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc; 2004.
36. Satorra A. Power of chi-square goodness-of-fit test in structural equation models: the case of non-normal data. In: Yanai H, Okada A, Shigemasu K, Kano Y, Meulman JJ, editors. New developments of psychometrics. Tokyo: Springer Verlag; 2003. p. 57–68.
37. Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14.
38. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-online. 2003;8:23–74.
39. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999,6:1–55.
40. Burham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical Information-Theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York:Springer-Verlag; 2002.
41. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3:71–92.
42. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:293–315.
43. Bakker A, Tims M, Derks D. Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Hum Relat. 2012;65(10):1359–78.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
- Nová metoda odlišení nádorové tkáně může zpřesnit resekci glioblastomů
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy