Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index
Autoři:
Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada aff001; Oluwabunmi Esther Oguntoyinbo aff001; Francis Oluwafunso Fasuyi aff003; Opeyemi Ayodiipo Idowu aff004; Adesola Christiana Odole aff002; Olusola Ayanniyi aff002; Olubusola Esther Johnson aff001; Elkanah Ayodele Orimolade aff005; Ajibola Babatunde Oladiran aff006; Francis Fatoye aff007
Působiště autorů:
Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile–Ife, Nigeria
aff001; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
aff002; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo, Nigeria
aff003; Department of Physiotherapy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Benin-City, Nigeria
aff004; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile–Ife, Nigeria
aff005; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
aff006; Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
aff007
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221138
Souhrn
Introduction
Low-Back Pain (LBP) is a common public health problem that is often worsened by maladaptive beliefs and disability. Thus, necessitating the need for availability of outcome measures to assess these sequelae among patients with chronic LBP. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and determine the psychometric properties of the Yoruba version of the ODI (ODI-Y).
Methods
The ODI-Y was cross-culturally adapted following the process involving forward translation, synthesis, backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ODI-Y were determined using the Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation. Other psychometric properties explored included the factor structure, convergent validity, standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change.
Results
One hundred and thirty-six patients with chronic LBP took part in the validation of the ODI-Y; 86 of these individuals took part in the test-retest reliability (within 1-week interval) of the translated instrument. The mean age of the respondents was 50.5±10.6years. The ODI-Y showed a high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.81. Test-retest of the Yoruba version of the ODI within 1-week interval yielded an Intra-Class Correlation coefficient of 0.89. The ODI-Y yielded a three-factor structure which accounted for 61.56% of the variance. Correlation of ODI-Y with the visual analogue scale was moderate (r = 0.30; p = 0.001). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the ODI-Y were 2.0 and 5.5.
Conclusions
The ODI was adapted into the Yoruba language and proved to have good psychometric properties that replicated the results of other obtainable versions. We recommend it for use among Yoruba speaking patients with LBP.
Klíčová slova:
Cross-cultural studies – Culture – Language – principal component analysis – Psycholinguistics – Psychometrics – Research validity – Syntax
Zdroje
1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ [Internet]. 2006 Jun 17 [cited 2018 Jul 2]; 332(7555):1430–1434. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16777886 doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1430 16777886
2. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Measuring the Global Burden of Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Jun 29]; 369(5):448–57. Available from: http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/faculty/detels/PH150/GlobBurdDis_NEJM_2013.pdf doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1201534 23902484
3. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, O’ Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271–273. 6450426
4. Davies CC, Nitz AJ. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14(6):399–408.
5. Stevens ML, Lin CCW, Maher CG. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [Internet]. Vol. 62, J Physiother. 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 29]. p. 116. Available from: https://www.journalofphysiotherapy.com/article/S1836-9553(15)00123-X/pdf doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.10.003 26687949
6. Roland M, Fairbank J. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire & Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire. Spine, 2000;25:3115–3125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006 11124727
7. Vianin M. Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Chiropr Med [Internet]. 2008 Dec [cited 2018 Jun 29];7(4):161–163. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19646379 doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.07.001 19646379
8. Fairbank J, Pynsent P. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine, 2000;25(22):2940–2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 11074683
9. Boscainos P, Sapkas G, Stillanessi E. Greek versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland Morris Disability questionnaire. Clin Orthop, 2003;41:40–53.
10. Grotle M, Brox J, Volleatad N. Cross-culutural adaptation of the Norwegian version of Roland Morris Disability questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:241–245. doi: 10.1080/16501970306094 14582557
11. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K. Association of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability index, Roland Morris Disabilty questionnaire and short-form 36. Spine, 2003;28:1601–1607. 12865852
12. Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C. Validation of the turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with LBP. Spine, 2004;29: 581–585. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113869.13209.03 15129077
13. Kim D, Lee S, Lee H. Validtion of the korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine, 2005;30:123–127. 15626992
14. Guermazi M, Mezghani M, Ghroubis. The Oswestry Disability Index for low back pain translated into arabic and validated in arab population. Ann Re-adapt Med Phys. 2005;2005:1–10.
15. Mannion A, Junge A Fairbank J. Development of German version of oswestry disability index part 1; cross cultual adaptation, reliability and validity. Eur Spine J. 2005;15:55–65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0815-0 15856341
16. Lauridsen H, Hartrigsen J, Manniche C. Danish version of Oswestry Disability Index for patients with LBP part 1; cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1705–1716. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0117-9 16736204
17. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 2006;31(14): E454–9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7 16778675
18. Viggatto R, Alexandre N, Correafilho H. Development of the Brazillian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disabiity Index. Spine, 2007;32:481–486. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47 17304141
19. Marco M, Paola B, Silvano F. Development of the Italian version of oswestry disability index (ODI-1). A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validated study. Spine, 2009;34(19):2090–2095. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b 19730216
20. Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, Grewal R, Sekar VP, Balachadran D. Translation of Oswestry Disability Index into Tamil with Cross Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity (§). Open Orthop J [Internet]. 2014;8(1):11–19.
21. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(12): 1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n 8263569
22. Akinpelu AO, Maruf F, Adegoke B. Validation of a yoruba translation of the World Health Organisation's quality of life scale short form among stroke survivors in south western Nigeria. Afr J Med Medi Sci, 2006;35:417–424.
23. Ayanniyi O, Ajayi A, Mbada CE, Auwa MA. Validity and reliability of hausa version of the oswestry disability index. Arch Physiother Glob Res [Internet]. 2016;20(3):7–11.
24. Wikipedia Yoruba People [Internet] USA: Wikipedia; 2018 [Updated 2018 Jun 25; cited 2018 Jun 29]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_people
25. Adeuyan JO. Contributions Of Yoruba People In The Economic & Political Developments Of Nigeria [Internet]. 1st ed. Bloomington: AuthorHouse; 2011 [cited 2018 Jun 29]. 300 p. Available from: https://read.barnesandnoble.com/book/contributions-of-yoruba-people-in-the-economic-political-developments-of-nigeria/who-are-the-yoruba-people
26. Mbada CE, Idowu OA, Ogunjimi OR, Ayanniyi O, Orimolade EA, Oladiran AB, et al. Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Yoruba Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(7):497–503.
27. Gould D. Visual analog scale. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:697–706. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00525.x 11822520
28. Conn D.A. 2005. Assessment of acute and chronic pain. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 6:14–15.
29. Odole AC, Akinpelu AO. Translation and alternate forms reliability of the visual analogue scale in the three major Nigerian languages. Int J Allied Health Sci Pract 2009; 7:3
30. Le May S, Ballard A, Khadra C, Gouin S, Plint AC, Villeneuve E, et al. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department. Pain [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2018 Jun 29];1. Available from: http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006396-900000000-98994.
31. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007; 60: 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752
32. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Sonogr 1990; 6(1):35–39.
33. Nieto R, Miro J, Huguet A. The fear-avoidance model in whiplash injuries. Eur J Pain 2009; 13:518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.005 18640860
34. Turner JA, Franklin G, Heagerty PJ, Wu R, Egan K, Fulton-Kehoe D, Gluck J V, Wickizer TM. The association between pain and disability. Pain 2004;112:307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010 15561386
35. Yong AG, Pearce S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2013; 9(2):79–94.
36. Harley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006:86:735–743. 16649896
37. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Out. 2006; 4(1):1.
38. Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986; 327:307–310.
39. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:s15–s20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619 11128900
40. Di Iorio A, Abate M, Guralnik JM, Bandinelli S, Cecchi F, Cherubini A, et al. From chronic low back pain to disability, a multifactorial mediated pathway: the In CHIANTI study. Spine 2007; 32: E809. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815cd422 18091475
41. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain 2008; 137:276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.002 17937976
42. Salvetti MDG, Pimenta CADM, Braga PE, Corrêa CF. (2012). Disability related to chronic low back pain: prevalence and associated factors. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2012; 46: 16–23.
43. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Rannou F, Wlodyka SD, et al. Chronicity, recurrence, and return to work in low back pain: common prognostic factors. In Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique: revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique 2004; 47: 179–189.
44. Sullivan MJL, Martel MO, Trost Z. Pain, Chronicity, and Disability. In: Loisel P., Anema J. (eds) Handbook of Work Disability. Springer, New York, NY; 2013.
45. Grabovac I, Dorner TE. Association between low back pain and various everyday performances. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2019; 1–9.
46. Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal 2010; 19: 1484–1494. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1353-6 20397032
47. Müller U, Duetz MS, Röder C, Greenough CG. Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. European Spine Journal 2004; 13: 301–313. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1 15029488
48. Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Ostelo RW. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: which has better measurement properties for measuring physical functioning in nonspecific low back pain. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical therapy 2016; 96: 1620–1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420 27081203
49. Yao M, Wang Q, Li Z, Yang L, Huang PX, Sun YL, et al. A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation of the Oswestry disability index. Spine 2016; 41: E1470–E1478. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001891 27607311
50. Domazet I, Nemir J, Barl P, Saša Đurić K, Pašalić I, Barić H, Stančić M. 2018. Validation of the Croatian version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Eur Spine J 27:2814–2822. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5757-z 30196420
51. Miekisiak M, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2013;38(4):E237–243. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827e948b 23197009
52. Valasek T, Varga PP, Szövérfi Z, Kumin M, Fairbank J, Lazary A, et al. Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Eur Spine J 2013;22(5):1010–1018. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2645-9 23321978
53. Lue YJ, Hsieh CL, Huang MH, Lin GT, Lu YM. Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1. Spine 2008;33(21):2354–2360. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818018d8 18827702
54. Igwesi-Chidobe CN, Amarachukwu C, Sorinola IO, Godfrey EL. Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of Igbo fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in mixed rural and urban Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain. PLoS ONE 2019;14(5): e0216482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216482 31086408
55. Adamu AS, Ibrahim AA, Ahmad YA, Akindele MA, Kaka B, Mukhtar NB. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients with Low Back Pain. Spine 2019; doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003068 31022151
56. Yao M, Wang Li, Yang L, Huang P, Sun Y, Wang Y et al. A Systematic Review of Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2016; 41: E1470–E1478. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001891
57. Shah S, Balaganapathy M. Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2017;22;30(5):1103–1109. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169728 28946530
58. Gamus D, Glasser S, Langner E, Beth-Hakimian A, Caspi I, Carmel N, et al. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2016;1–9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150597
59. Algarni AS, Ghorbel S, Jones JG, Guerzmazi M. Validation of an Arabic version of the Oswestry index in Saudi Arabia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2014;57(9–10):653–663. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.06.006 25262247
60. Payares K, Lugo LH, Morales V, Londono A. Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain. Spine 2011;36(26):E1730–1735. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184 22138784
61. Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, Petri S, Häkkinen A. Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Version 2.0 of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2011; 36:332–338. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdd702 20823785
62. Gabel CP, Cuesta-Vargas A, Qian M, Vengust R, Berlemann U, Aghayev E, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 35,263 verifies a one-factor structure but practicality issues remain. Eur Spine J 2017;26(8):2007–2013. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5179-3 28646454
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2020 Číslo 1
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Proč při poslechu některé muziky prostě musíme tančit?
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Chůze do schodů pomáhá prodloužit život a vyhnout se srdečním chorobám
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Severity of misophonia symptoms is associated with worse cognitive control when exposed to misophonia trigger sounds
- Chemical analysis of snus products from the United States and northern Europe
- Calcium dobesilate reduces VEGF signaling by interfering with heparan sulfate binding site and protects from vascular complications in diabetic mice
- Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) supplementation in drinking water on chicken crop and caeca microbiome
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy