Severity of misophonia symptoms is associated with worse cognitive control when exposed to misophonia trigger sounds
Autoři:
Emily C. Daniels aff001; Andrew Rodriguez aff001; Darya L. Zabelina aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America
aff001
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227118
Souhrn
The present study aimed to investigate the extent to which the severity of misophonia symptoms is linked with cognitive control under misophonia symptom-provocation circumstances in the general population sample. Participants (N = 79) completed a measure of cognitive control–a Stroop color naming task, which consists of congruent and incongruent stimuli, and requires inhibition of a prepotent response (reading a word) in the service of a less predominant response (naming a color), while listening to misophonia symptom-provocation or universally unpleasant sounds. Participants’ misophonia sound sensitivity, and emotional behaviors towards trigger sounds were assessed using the Misophonia Questionnaire. Stronger emotional behavioral reactions to misophonia trigger sounds were significantly associated with the larger Stroop effect when participants were exposed to the misophonia trigger sounds, but not when they were exposed to the universally unpleasant sounds. This effect held when controlling for the personality trait of Neuroticism and for baseline levels of anxiety. Both elevated misophonia sound sensitivity and emotional behaviors towards trigger sounds significantly correlated with higher self-reported anxiety when performing the Stroop task. However, only elevated emotional behaviors towards trigger sounds were linked with higher anxiety levels at baseline, suggesting that people who experience stronger emotions and behavioral reactions to misophonia trigger sounds may have higher anxiety at a trait level. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
Klíčová slova:
Anxiety – Behavior – Cognition – Emotions – Neuropsychiatric disorders – Personality traits – Reaction time – Surveys
Zdroje
1. Jastreboff M. M., & Jastreboff P. J. (2002). Decreased sound tolerance and Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 24(2), 74–81.
2. Schwartz P., Leyendecker J., & Conlon M. (2011). Hyperacusis and misophonia: The lesser-known siblings of tinnitus. Minnesota Medicine, 94, 42–43.
3. Schröder A., Vulink N., & Denys D. (2013). Misophonia: Diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder. PLoS ONE, 8(1).
4. Rouw R., & Erfanian M. (2018). A large‐scale study of misophonia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 453–479. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22500 28561277
5. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. BMC Med, 17, 133–137.
6. Kumar S., Tansley-Hancock O., Sedley W., Winston J. S., Callaghan M. F., Allen M., et al. (2017). The brain basis for misophonia. Current Biology, 27(4), 527–533. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.048 28162895
7. Seeley W. W., Menon V., Schatzberg A. F., Keller J., Glover G. H., Kenna H., et al. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(9), 2349–2356. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 17329432
8. Craig A. D., & Craig A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70. doi: 10.1038/nrn2555 19096369
9. Schröder A., van Wingen G., Eijsker N., Giorgi R. S., Vulink N. C., Turbyne C., et al. (2019). Misophonia is associated with altered brain activity in the auditory cortex and salience network. Scientific Reports, 9, 7542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44084-8 31101901
10. Taylor S. (2017). Misophonia: A new mental disorder? Medical Hypotheses, 103, 109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.05.003 28571795
11. Gratton G., Cooper P., Fabiani M., Carter C. S., & Karayanidis F. (2018). Dynamics of cognitive control: Theoretical bases, paradigms, and a view for the future. Psychophysiology, 55(3), e13016.
12. MacDonald A. W., Cohen J. D., Stenger V. A., & Carter C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472), 1835–1838. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 10846167
13. Muraven M., & Baumeister R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 10748642
14. Pardo J. V., Pardo P. J., Janer K. W., & Raichle M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(1), 256–259.
15. Wu M. S., Lewin A. B., Murphy T. K., & Storch E. A. (2014). Misophonia: Incidence, phenomenology, and clinical correlates in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(10), 994–1007. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22098 24752915
16. Graham R., Robinson J., & Mulhall P. (2009). Effects of concurrent music listening on emotional processing. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 485–493.
17. Edelstein M., Brang D., Rouw R., & Ramachandran V. S. (2013). Misophonia: Physiological investigations and case descriptions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 296. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00296 23805089
18. Johnson P. L., Webber T.A., Wu M. S., Lewin A. B., Murphy T. K., & Storch E. A. (2013). When selective audiovisual stimuli become unbearable: A case series on pediatric misophonia. Neuropsychiatry, 3(6), 569–575.
19. Dozier T. H., & Morrison K. L. (2017). Phenomenology of misophonia: Initial physical and emotional responses. American Journal of Psychology, 130(4), 431–438.
20. Spielberger C. D., & Gorsuch R. L. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults: sampler set: Manual, test, scoring key. Mind Garden.
21. Costa P. T. Jr, & McCrae R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55(2), 299–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x 3612472
22. Charles S. T., Reynolds C. A., & Gatz M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 136–151. 11195886
23. Goldberg L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7–28.
24. IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
25. Seaborne A., & Fiorella L. (2018). Effects of background chewing sounds on learning: The role of misophonia sensitivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 264–269.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2020 Číslo 1
- Jak a kdy u celiakie začíná reakce na lepek? Možnou odpověď poodkryla čerstvá kanadská studie
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- Spermie, vajíčka a mozky – „jednohubky“ z výzkumu 2024/38
- Infekce se v Americe po příjezdu Kolumba šířily nesrovnatelně déle, než se traduje
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Severity of misophonia symptoms is associated with worse cognitive control when exposed to misophonia trigger sounds
- Chemical analysis of snus products from the United States and northern Europe
- Calcium dobesilate reduces VEGF signaling by interfering with heparan sulfate binding site and protects from vascular complications in diabetic mice
- Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) supplementation in drinking water on chicken crop and caeca microbiome
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy