A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing

English version

Autoři: Jannis Engel ^aff001; Nora Szech ^aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Economics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe,Germany ^aff001; Berlin Social Science Center (WZB), Berlin, Germany ^aff002; CESifo, Munich, Germany ^aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227036

Souhrn

This paper explores the role of cheap excuses in product choice. If agents feel that they fulfill one ethical aspect, they may care less about other independent ethical facets within product choice. Choosing a product that fulfills one ethical aspect may then suffice for maintaining a high moral self-image in agents and render it easier to ignore other ethically relevant aspects they would otherwise care about more. The use of such cheap excuses could thus lead to a “static moral self-licensing” effect, and this would extend the logic of the well-known dynamic moral self-licensing. Our experimental study provides empirical evidence that the static counterpart of moral self-licensing exists. Furthermore, effects spill over to unrelated, ethically relevant contexts later in time. Thus, static moral self-licensing and dynamic moral self-licensing can exist next to each other. However, it is critical that agents do not feel that they fulfilled an ethical criterion out of sheer luck, that is, agents need some room so that they can attribute the ethical improvement at least partly to themselves. Outsiders, although monetarily incentivized for correct estimates, are completely oblivious to the effects of moral self-licensing, both static and dynamic.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Decision making – Economic agents – Experimental economics – Labor economics – Personality – Personality traits – Psychological attitudes

Zdroje

1. The World of Organic Agriculture–Statistics and Emerging Trends 2016. FiBL & IFOAM. 2017 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: http://orgprints.org/31151/1/willer-lernoud-2016-world-of-organic.pdf

2. US Department of Agriculture ERS. Organic market overview. 2016 [Cited December 14 2019] https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/organic-agriculture/organic-market-overview/

3. Consumer Technology Association. 2017 Sustainability Report. 2017 [Cited 14 Dec 2019]. Available from: https://cdn.ces.tech/ces/media/sustainability/_pdf/cta_2017_sustainability_report.pdf

4. Verifying environmental sustainability in the electronics marketplace. Underwriter Laboratories. [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.ul.com/insights/verifying-environmental-sustainability-electronics-marketplace

5. Cowe R, Williams S. Who are the ethical consumers? Ethical Consumerism Report, Cooperative Bank; 2000.

6. Zane DM, Irwin JR, Reczek RW. Do Less Ethical Consumers Denigrate More Ethical Consumers? The Effect of Willful Ignorance on Judgments of Others. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2016,26(3): 337–349.

7. H&M Conscious Actions–Sustainability Report 2015. 2015 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://sustainability.hm.com/content/dam/hm/about/documents/en/CSR/2015%20Sustainability%20report/HM_SustainabilityReport_2015_final_FullReport_en.pdf

8. 2018 Conflict Minerals Report. Apple. 2018 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple-Conflict-Minerals-Report.pdf

9. H&M. Sustainable Fashion–Working Conditions [Internet]. [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://hmgroup.com/sustainability/people/working-conditions.html

10. H&M. Sustainable Fashion–Wages [Internet]. Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://hmgroup.com/sustainability/people/wages.html

11. Apple. Supplier Responsibility 2018 Progress Report. 2018 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple_SR_2018_Progress_Report.pdf

12. Duhigg C, Barboza D. In China, human costs are built into an iPad. New York Times. 2012 Jan 25 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=2

13. Burke J. Bangladesh factory fires: fashion industry's latest crisis. The Guardian. 2013 December 8 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/08/bangladesh-factory-fires-fashion-latest-crisis

14. Fullerton 2018 Fullerton, J. Suicide at Chinese iPhone factory reignites concern over working conditions. Telegraph. 2018 Jan 7 [Cited 2019 December 14]. Available from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/07/suicide-chinese-iphone-factory-reignites-concern-working-conditions/

15. Preston J, Leffler C. When “best” is far from good enough—Violations of workers’ rights at four of H&M «best-in-class» suppliers in Cambodia. 2016.

16. Bandura A. Moral Disengagement How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning, New York, 2016.

17. Gert B. The definition of morality. 2012. Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/morality-definition

18. Levitt S, List J. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2007; 21(2): 153–174.

19. Charness G, Fehr E. From the lab to the real world. Science 2015;350(6260): 512–513. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4343 26516269

20. Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Science 2009; 326(5952): 535–538. doi: 10.1126/science.1168244 19900889

21. Potts. German donations reach record highs. Deutsche Welle. 2016 March 1 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://p.dw.com/p/1I4qc

22. Hagen K, Maxwill P. Flüchtlingskrise überfordert deutsche Behörden. Spiegel. 2015 Aug11 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Availablefrom: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/fluechtlinge-in-deutschland-warum-so-viel-chaos-und-leid-a-1046851.html

23. Akerlof G, Kranton R. Economics and Identity. Quart. J. Econom. 2000;115(3): 715–753

24. Falk A, Szech N. Competing Image Concerns: Pleasures of skill and moral conduct. Working paper, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. 2019. Available from: https://polit.econ.kit.edu/deutsch/Research_446.php

25. Loewenstein G. Because it is there: The challenge of mountaineering…for utility theory Kyklos 1999;52(3): 315–43.

26. Bénabou R, Tirole J. Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quart. J. Econom. 2002;117(3): 871–915.

27. Sobel J. Markets and other-regarding preferences. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, USA. 2010.

28. Falk A, Szech N (2013) Morals and markets. Science 2013; 340(6133): 707–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1231566 23661753

29. Kirchler M, Huber J, Stefan M, Sutter M. Market design and moral behavior. Management Sci. 2016;62(9): 2615–2625.

30. Pigors M, Rockenbach B. Consumer social responsibility. Management Sci. 2016;62(11): 3123–3137.

31. Falk A, Neuruber T, Szech N. Diffusion of Being Pivotal and Immoral Outcomes. The Review of Economic Studies, accepted

32. Rothenhäusler D, Schweizer N, Szech N. Guilt in voting and public good games. European Economic Review 2018;101: 664–681.

33. Kerschbamer R, Neururer D, Sutter M. Insurance coverage of customers induces dishonesty of sellers in markets for credence goods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016;113(27): 7454–58. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518015113 27325784

34. Bartling B, Weber RA, Yao L.Do markets erode social responsibility? Quart. J. Econom. 2015;130(1): 219–66.

35. Friedrichsen J, Engelmann D. Who cares about social image? European Economic Review 2018;110: 61–77

36. Monin B, Miller DT. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 2001;81(1): 33.

37. Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL. Sinning saints and saintly sinners the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psych. Sci. 2009;20(4): 523–28.

38. Mazar N, Zhong CB. Do green products make us better people? Psych. Sci. 2010;21(4): 494–98.

39. Merritt AC, Effron DA, Monin B. Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2010;4(5): 344–57.

40. Gneezy U, Imas A, Madarász K. Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Sci. 2014;60(11): 2645–58.

41. Joint Economic Committee. The economic impact of the fashion industry. Washington, DC: United States Congress; 2015. Available from: https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/638a7351-c79d-4f4d-b1f2-13a4a4ae7a77/jec-fashion-industry-report—-sept-2015-update.pdf

42. FashionUnited 2016 FashionUnited. Global fashion industry statistics—International apparel [Internet]. 2016 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://fashionunited.com/global-fashion-industry-statistics

43. International Labour Organization. Wages and working hours in the textiles, clothing, leather and footwear industries. 2014 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@sector/documents/publication/wcms_300463.pdf

44. International Labour Organization. Improving working conditions in the ready made garment industry: Progress and achievements. 2016 [Cited 2019 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/dhaka/Whatwedo/Projects/WCMS_240343/lang—en/index.htm

45. Danzer AM, Grundke R. Coerced labor in the cotton sector: How global commodity prices (don’t) transmit to the poor. IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 9971. 2016.

46. Rammstedt B, John OP. Kurzversion des Big Five inventory (BFI-K) Diagnostica 2005;51(4): 195–206.

47. Christie R, Geis F. Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York; 1970).

48. Falk A, Becker A, Dohmen TJ, Huffman D, Sunde U. The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016.

49. Greiner B. Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 2015;1(1): 114–125.

50. Bock O, Baetge I, Nicklisch A. hroot–Hamburg registration and organization online tool. European Economic Review 2014;71:117–120

51. Leiner DJ. SoSci Survey (Version 2.6.00-i) [Computer software]. 2016.

52. Roberts JA. Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward?, Business Horizons 1996;39(1): 79–83.

53. Carrigan M, Attalla A. The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing 2001;18(7): 560–578.

54. O'Fallon M, Butterfield K. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. J. Bus. Ethics 2005;59(4): 375–413.

55. Loe TW, Ferrell L, Mansfield P. A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business J. Bus. Ethics 2000;25: 185.

56. Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and social psychology review 1999;3(3): 193–209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 15661671

57. Tang TLP, Chen YJ, Sutarso T (2008) Bad apples in bad (business) barrels: The love of money, machiavellianism, risk tolerance, and unethical behavior. Management Decision 20018;46(2): 243–263.

58. Sakalaki M, Richardson C, Thépaut Y. Machiavellianism and Economic Opportunism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2007;37(6): 1181–1190.

59. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 1992;13(6): 653–65.

60. Evans AM, Revelle W. Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality 2008;42: 1585–1593.

61. Kimball MS. Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica 1990;58(1): 53–73.

62. Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX. (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 2007;33(1): 67–80

63. van der Weele 2014 Van der Weele JJ. Inconvenient truths: Determinants of strategic ignorance in moral dilemmas. SSRN Working Paper.

64. Bartling B, Engl F, Weber RA. Does willful ignorance deflect punishment?–An experimental study. European Economic Review 2014;70: 512–524.

65. Grossman Z. Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences. Management Science 2014;60(11): 2659–2665.

66. Grossman Z, van der Weele JJ (2017) Self-image and willful ignorance in social decisions. Journal of the European Economic Association 2017;15(1): 173–217

67. Freddi E. Do People Avoid Morally Relevant Information? Evidence from the Refugee Crisis CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2017–034. 2017.

68. Serra-Garcia M, Szech N (2018) The (In)Elasticity of Moral Ignorance. Working paper, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. 2018.

69. Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G. Information Avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature 2017;55: 96–135.

70. Epley N and Gilovich T. The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2016;30(3): 133–140.

71. Gino F, Norton MI, Weber RA. Motivated Bayesians: Feeling Moral While Acting Egoistically. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2016;30(3): 189–212.

A little good is good enough: Ethical consumption, cheap excuses, and moral self-licensing

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

INSIGHTS from European Respiratory Congress

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií