#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Metabolomic analysis of the occurrence of bitter fruits on grafted oriental melon plants


Authors: Shuangshuang Zhang aff001;  Lanchun Nie aff001;  Wensheng Zhao aff001;  Qiang Cui aff001;  Jiahao Wang aff001;  Yaqian Duan aff001;  Chang Ge aff001
Authors place of work: College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei, China aff001;  Hebei Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, Baoding, Hebei, China aff002;  Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry of Hebei Province, Baoding, Hebei, China aff003
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223707

Summary

Grafting has been widely applied to melon (Cucumis melo L.) production to alleviate obstacles of continuous cropping and control soil-borne diseases. However, grafting often leads to a decline of fruit quality. For example, sometimes bitter fruits are produced on grafted plants. However, the underlying physiological mechanism still remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of different rootstocks on the taste of fruits of the Balengcui, an oriental melon cultivar, during summer production. The results showed that all grafted plants with Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks produced bitter fruits, while non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks produced no bitter fruits. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and metabonomic analysis were performed to investigate the mechanism underlying the occurrence of bitter fruits. Metabolite comparisons of fruits from plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks both with non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks showed that 17 metabolites including phospholipids, cucurbitacins and flavonoids, exhibited changes. The three Cucurbitacins, Cucurbitacin O, Cucurbitacin C, and Cucurbitacin S, increased dramatically. The 10 phospholipids PS(18:1(9Z)/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(P-18:0/15:0), PA(18:1(11Z)/18:1(11Z)), PE(16:0/18:0), PS(O-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PI(16:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PA(15:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)), PS(P-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(22:0/22:1(11Z)), and PA(17:1(9Z)/0:0)) were significantly decreased, while two PA (16:0/18:2 (9Z, 12Z) and 16:0/18:1 (11Z)), two flavonoids (pelargonidin 3-(6''-malonylglucoside)-5-glucoside and malvidin 3-rutinoside) significantly increased in fruits of plants grafted onto Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks. These metabolites were involved in the glycerophospholipid metabolic pathway, the mevalonate pathway, and the phenylpropanoid pathway. In summary, these results showed that the bitter fruits of grafted Balengcui were caused by Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks. Phospholipids, cucurbitacins, and flavonoids were the key contributors for the occurrence of bitter fruits in Balengcui melon after grafting onto Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks.

Keywords:

Fruits – Phospholipids – Plant physiology – Plant biochemistry – Inbred strains – Terpenes – Metabolites – Melons

Introduction

The melon (Cucumis melo L.) is an important horticultural crop [1]. In 2017, the planting area was 490,327 hectares, achieving a global yield of 17,147,817 t, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [2]. Melon production plays an important role in horticultural planting [35]. However, intensive production led to continuous cropping obstacles and an aggravation of soil-borne diseases [6,7]. To alleviate continuous cropping obstacles and control soil-borne diseases, grafting is being widely applied to melon production [810]. However, grafting sometimes leads to a decline of fruit quality. Balengcui, an oriental melon cultivar known for its crispy fruit, was commonly grafted onto Cucurbita maxima Duch. However, the grafted plants produced bitter fruits during summer cultivation.

Cucurbitacins were identified as the main compounds that caused the bitterness of Cucurbitaceae fruits [11]. Highly oxidized tetracyclic triterpenoid compounds were synthesized by the methylovalerate pathway from acetyl CoA under the catalysis of a series of enzymes [12]. Generally, cultivated Cucurbitaceae plants do not produce bitter fruits. However, several factors, such as low or high temperature, excessive nitrogen, grafting, plant growth regulators, and changes in the physical and chemical properties of soil may lead to a coordinated operation of a number of genes and induce the synthesis of cucurbitacins [1315]. Kano and Goto reported that during cucumber growth, plants that received twice the amount of nitrogen fertilizer had a higher probability to produce bitter leaves and fruits than plants that received a normal amount of nitrogen fertilizer [16]. Excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer led to an imbalance of the N metabolism in cucumber plants, and HMG-CoA reductase activity increased, which resulted in the synthesis of cucurbitacin in cucumber plants. However, few reports addressed how grafting caused bitterness in fruits.

Both internal and external factors can cause a coordinated physiological response. Metabolomics as a well-established method to characterize the plant metabolism has been widely used to study the effects of environmental factors on the plant physiological metabolism [17,18] and identify the response mechanisms of plants to biotic or abiotic stresses [19]. Meng et al. compared the metabolite profiles of high-flavonoid mutants and common Ginkgo leaves, and identified 72 different metabolites related to the flavonoid biosynthesis [20]. Metabonomics analysis indicated that both the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway and lipid metabolism pathway regulated Ginkgo flavone biosynthesis. In this study, the effect of different rootstocks on the occurrence of bitter fruits of Balengcui during summer production was investigated. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and metabonomic analysis were performed to investigate the mechanism underlying the occurrence of bitter fruits of grafted plants.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

To investigate the effect of different rootstocks on the occurrence of bitter fruits, Balengcui seedlings with two cotyledons were grafted onto six Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks (Yemuyixiong, Ribenxuesong, Qingshengzhenjia, Jingxinzhen3, Feichangfuzuo, and Jingyutianzhen1) and two Cucumis melo L. rootstocks (Inbred line1 and Inbred line2). Detailed information about the rootstocks is listed in S1 Table. Both grafted and non-grafted seedlings with 3–4 euphylla were planted in a greenhouse on June 20, 2018. This study used a randomized block design with three replications. The area of each plot was 10 m2 and the planting space was 70 × 35 cm. The temperature was 35°C during the day and 22°C during the night and the relative air humidity was 70–80%.

Identification of bitter fruits

During the flowering and fruit setting periods, the fruits that flowered on the same day were marked at 10–12 nodes of the main vine. At the fruit marketable mature stage, 25 fruits with the same maturity were taken per plot. Twenty tasters were selected to sample all fruits. All tasters evaluated the fruits objectively and agreed to publish their evaluation results. They rinsed their mouth after each tasting to avoid affecting their judgment of the next sample [21]. A fruit was defined as bitter when more than 10 tasters identified it as bitter. The bitter score was evaluated with a 10-point system and the average value was used.

LC-MS analysis

Bitter fruits with the highest bitter score from grafted plants that used Ribenxuesong as rootstock, non-bitter fruits from grafted plants with muskmelon Inbred Line 1 as rootstock, and non-bitter fruits from non-grafted plants were used for metabolomic analysis. Fruit samples (60 mg) with 20 μl internal standard solutions (L-2-chloro-phenylalanine, 0.3 mg/mL) and 1 mL methanol were broken into homogenate and ultrasonically extracted for 45 min. The extracts were centrifuged and the supernatants were taken for LC-MS analysis.

LC-MS was performed with a Waters UPLC I-class system, equipped with a binary solvent delivery manager and a sample manager, and a Waters VION IMS Q-TOF Mass Spectrometer with an electrospray ionization (Waters, Milford, CT, USA), which can operate in either positive or negative ion mode. An acquity BEH C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 μm) was used as chromatographic column and a temperature of 45°C was maintained. Mobile phases A and B were water and acetonitrile, both of which included 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was 0.40 mL/min and the injection volume was 3.00 μl. The gradient elution program is listed in the following: 5–20% B, 0–2 min, 20–60% B, 2–8 min, 60–100% B, 8–12 min, 100% B, 2 min, 100% to 5% B, 14–14.5 min, 5% B, 1 min. The temperatures of ion source and desolvation were 120°C and 500°C, respectively. The desolvation gas flow rate was 900 L/h. The mass spectrum scan ranged from 50 to 1,000 m/z and the scanning time was 0.1 s with an interval of 0.02 s.

Data analysis

Progenesis QI (Waters Corporation, Milford, CI, USA) was used to perform baseline filtration, peak identification, search characterization, integration, retention time correction, peak alignment, and normalization. The secondary fragments of the metabolite detection were matched to the standard position in the respective database to obtain the data matrix consisting of retention time, mass-to-charge ratio (or metabolite name), and peak intensity. SIMCA-14.1 (Umetrics AB, Umea, Sweden) was used to implement the principal component analysis (PCA) and the orthogonal partial least-squares discrimination analysis (OPLS-DA) multivariate statistical analyses. The different metabolites were initially screened based on a variable importance in the projection (VIP) >1. Student t-test was performed by SPSS11.5 and metabolites were assumed to be significantly different at P < 0.05.

Results

Effects of different rootstocks on the occurrence of bitter fruits

The results showed that all grafted plants with Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks produced bitter fruits at different proportions (Table 1). The highest proportion of bitter fruits was 72% in plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks. However, no bitter fruits were identified in all plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks (Inbred line 1 and 2) and in all non-grafted plants. These data indicated that rootstocks are responsible for the occurrence of bitter fruits of Balengcui grafted plants during summer cultivation.

Tab. 1. Evaluation of bitter fruits.
Evaluation of bitter fruits.

Identification and analysis of fruits metabolites

LC-MS ion flow maps of bitter fruits from plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong as rootstock, non-bitter fruits from plants grafted onto muskmelon Inbred Line 1 as rootstock, and non-bitter fruit from non-grafted plants are shown in Fig 1. The number and intensity of metabolites in fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks were significantly different compared with fruits of non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks in positive and negative ion mode (Fig 1A and 1B). 1194 metabolites were identified (Fig 2), 27% of which were fatty acyl metabolites, 23% were glycerol phospholipids metabolites, 12% were sterol lipid metabolites, 11% were polyketide glycosides metabolites, 6% were glycerol metabolites, 5% were prenol lipid metabolites, 4% were sphingolipids metabolites, and 2% were steroid and derivative metabolites, carboxylic acid and derivative metabolites, and organic oxide metabolites. Furthermore, 1% amino acids and 5% other compounds were identified.

Fig. 1. Base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto either muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
Base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto either muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
(A) BPI chromatogram in positive mode. (B) BPI chromatogram in negative mode.
Fig. 2. Classification of identified fruit metabolites.
Classification of identified fruit metabolites.
Different classifications of fruit metabolites are shown as different colors: Black, fatty acyls. Blue, glycerophospholipids. Orange, sterol lipids. Gray, polyketides. Green, glycerolipids. Purple, prenol lipids. Red, sphingolipids. Light blue, steroids and steroid derivatives. Yellow, carboxylicacids and derivatives. Dark red, organooxygen compounds. Pink, amino acids. Light green, other metabolites.

PCA was performed to verify the data and the PCA score map is shown in Fig 3 (R2X = 0.763, Q2 = 0.219). All samples were uniformly distributed in the T2 ellipse, indicating a lack of abnormal sample points. Sample points of the same group clearly clustered together and sample points from three types of fruit can be distinguished in the overall distribution. These results indicated the existence of significant differences in metabolites among fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong or muskmelon Inbred Line 1 as rootstocks. The model parameter was R2X = 0.763, which indicates a good fit and can be used for the screening and analysis of different metabolites.

Fig. 3. PCA score plot of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
PCA score plot of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
R2X = 0.763, Q2 = 0.219.

To further analyze the metabolites of fruits, OPLS-DA models were established. The score maps are shown in Fig 4. The OPLS-DA model parameters of fruits from plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks and non-grafted plants were R2X = 0.586, R2Y = 0.955, Q2 = 0.873 (Fig 4A). The parameters of fruits from plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks and muskmelon Inbred Line 1 rootstocks were R2X = 0.598, R2Y = 0.972, Q2 = 0.881 (Fig 4B). The parameters of R2 and Q2 all exceeded 0.5. Six replicates per group were closely concentrated and sample points of different groups were well separated. Therefore, these models could be used to screen different metabolites.

Fig. 4. OPLS-DA score plot of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
OPLS-DA score plot of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon or pumpkin rootstocks.
(A) OPLS-DA score plot of melon fruits from non-grafted plants and from plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks. R2X = 0.586, R2Y = 0.955, Q2 = 0.873. (B) OPLS-DA score plot of melon fruits from plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks and plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks. R2X = 0.598, R2Y = 0.972, Q2 = 0.881.

Effects of different rootstocks on fruit metabolites

According to the results of OPLS-DA with the screening condition of VIP > 1 and P < 0.05, 37 metabolites, including phospholipids, sterols, flavonoids, and terpenoids, significantly changed in bitter fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong as rootstock compared with fruits of non-grafted plants (S2 Table). Sixteen phospholipids were significantly decreased and six were significantly increased. For sterol metabolites, four were significantly increased and two were significantly decreased. Three flavonoid metabolites were significantly increased and one was significantly decreased. The terpenoids metabolites cucurbitacin O, cucurbitacin C, and cucurbitacin S increased 398.53, 203.33, and 238.21 times, respectively. Two further metabolites (spiramycin and monoisobutyl phthalic acid) were also significantly increased in fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks.

Comparing metabolites of bitter fruits of the plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong as rootstock with fruits of plants grafted onto muskmelon Inbred Line 1 as rootstock identified 33 significantly changed metabolites including 16 phospholipids, four flavones, three sterols, three terpenoids, three organic acids, and four other compounds (S3 Table). Among these 16 phospholipid metabolites, PA (16:0/18:2 (9Z, 12Z), PA (16:0/18:1 (11Z), and PA (18:1 (9Z)/18:4 (6Z, 9Z, 12Z, 15Z) increased, while the other 13 glycerophospholipids decreased significantly. Among the four flavonoids, Pelargonidin 3-(6''-malonylglucoside)-5-glucoside, Malvidin 3-rutinoside, and (+)-Myristinin A increased, while 7-Prenyloxy-3',4'-dimethoxyisoflavone decreased. For the three sterols, hippuristanolide increased, while 1β, 3β, 5α, 6β-tetrahydroxyandrostan-17-one, and diginatin decreased. The three terpenoids Cucurbitacin O, Cucurbitacin C, and Cucurbitacin S increased by 89.36 times, 337.81 times, and 168.58 times, respectively. 9-tetradecynoic acid decreased. Citric acid, 26:4(11Z,14Z,17Z,20Z) and glycerol esters, DG (16:0/18:3 (9Z, 12Z, 15Z)/0:0) and DG (20:5 (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z, 17Z)/0:0/20:5 (5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z, 17Z)) and two other metabolites (D-Maltose and Uridine 5'-monophosphate) increased.

Overall, compared with the non-bitter fruits produced by non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon Inbred Line 1 rootstock, 17 metabolites showed changes, including three terpenoids, two flavonoids, and 12 phospholipids in bitter fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong as rootstock (Fig 5). Phospholipids (PS(18:1(9Z)/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(P-18:0/15:0), PA(18:1(11Z)/18:1(11Z)), PE(16:0/18:0), PS(O-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PI(16:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PA (15:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)), PS(P-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(22:0/22:1(11Z)), and PA(17:1(9Z) /0:0)) were significantly decreased, while PA (16:0/18:2 (9Z, 12Z)) and PA (16:0/18:1 (11Z) were significantly increased (Fig 5A). The three terpenoid metabolites Cucurbitacin O, Cucurbitacin C, and Cucurbitacin S significantly increased (Fig 5B). Two flavonoids, pelargonidin 3-(6'-malonyl glucoside) -5-glucoside and malvidin 3-rutinoside, were significantly increased (Fig 5C). These 17 different metabolites were mapped onto KEGG and Metabo Analyst 3.0 websites. Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted by combining -log P and Impact values. The involved metabolic pathways were the glycerol phospholipid pathway, the methylovalerate pathway, and the phenylpropane pathway.

Fig. 5. Significantly changed fruit metabolites identified via comparison between plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks and non-grafted plants or plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks.
Significantly changed fruit metabolites identified via comparison between plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks and non-grafted plants or plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks.
Seventeen significantly changed fruit metabolites were identified including phospholipids (A), cucurbitacin (B), and flavonoids (C). Numbers 1–12 represent PS(18:1(9Z)/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(P-18:0/15:0), PA(18:1(11Z)/18:1(11Z)), PE(16:0/18:0), PA(16:0/18:1(11Z)), PA(16:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(O-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PI(16:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)), PA(15:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)), PS(P-16:0/17:2(9Z,12Z)), PS(22:0/22:1(11Z)), PA(17:1(9Z)/0:0), respectively. Numbers 13–15 represent Cucurbitacin C, Cucurbitacin S, and Cucurbitacin O, respectively. Numbers 16 and 17 represent pelargonidin 3-(6''-malonylglucoside)-5-glucoside and malvidin 3-rutinoside, respectively. Lowercase letters represent P < 0.05 and capital letters represent P < 0.01. The letter before "/" indicates the significance between plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks and non-grafted plants. The letter after "/" indicates the significance between plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks and muskmelon rootstocks.

Discussion

Bitterness sometimes occurs in fruits of cucurbitaceae plants such as melon, cucumber, and gourd, which severely affected the fruit quality. Low or high temperature, malnutrition, plant growth regulators, and rootstock could all lead to bitter fruits in cucurbitaceae plants [14, 15]. In this study, all Balengcui plants grafted onto Cucurbita maxima Duch. produced bitter fruits, but bitter fruits were not produced on the non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks. These Cucurbita maxima Duch. rootstocks were also often used as Balengcui rootstocks by farmers during winter; however, these grafted plants did not produce bitter fruits. Why bitter fruits were only produced in summer remained unknown.

LC-MS was performed for metabonomic analysis to investigate the mechanism underlying the occurrence of bitter fruits. Metabolites comparisons of fruits from the plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks both with non-grafted plants and plants grafted onto muskmelon rootstocks showed that 17 metabolites exhibited the same changes (Fig 5). Three cucurbitacins dramatically increased hundreds of times in the fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks. Cucurbitacins, as secondary metabolites of highly oxidized tetracyclic triterpenoids, were the main compounds that caused bitterness in fruits of cucurbitaceous plants such as cucumber, pumpkin, and squash [2224]. These metabolites were the direct cause of bitterness of fruits from plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks.

This increase of cucurbitacins was accompanied by a significant decrease of 10 phospholipids, and increases of two PA (PA (16:0/18:1 (11Z) and PA (16:0/18:2 (9Z, 12Z)) and two flavonoids (pelargonidin 3-(6''-malonylglucoside)-5-glucoside and malvidin 3-rutinoside) in the fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks (Fig 5A and 5C). Phospholipids are important membrane components, which are essential for the maintenance of cell stability and for the protection of plants against stress [25]. PAs are also important lipid signaling molecules that can be found in plants, which involved mediating the production and reaction of peroxides and affecting the accumulation of oxidized lipids [2628]. Several PAs increased under abiotic stress in plants [29]. Flavonoids, as secondary metabolites of phenolic compounds, play an important role in the plant response to environmental signals. Flavonoids can protect plant tissues from damage of high-energy wavelengths (ultraviolet-A and ultraviolet-B) under high temperature and strong light stress [30, 31].

The decrease of a large number of phospholipids and the increase of two PAs in the fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks indicated that fruits were subjected to stress (high temperature and strong light in summer), which led to the occurrence of and membrane lipid peroxidation. The flavonoid increase was also in response to this stress. Wu et al. reported that grafted muskmelon plants with pumpkin rootstocks exhibited lower antioxidant enzyme activity and a higher level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [32, 33]. ROS lead to membrane lipid peroxidation, which destroyed the cell membrane structure and physiologic integrity [34, 35]. Pumpkins are biologically less resistant to high temperatures than melons. During summer cultivation, the prevailing high temperature and strong light stress may have caused an imbalance of the ROS metabolism system in fruits of plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks. This then resulted in membrane lipid peroxidation and phospholipid decomposition into fatty acids [36]. These fatty acids were further oxidized and produced large amounts of acetyl coenzyme A, which (as a precursor) entered the methylovalerate pathway and Cucurbitacins were synthesized [37]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the signal transduction and gene regulation of the cucurbitacin synthesis through the methylovalerate pathway and how the rootstocks affect the fruit metabolism still requires further research.

Conclusions

Pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) rootstocks yileded bitter fruits in grafted melon plants during summer production. In bitter fruits, dramatic increases of cucurbitacins were accompanied by significant decreases of a large number of phospholipids and increases of several PAs and flavonoids. These results indicated that during summer cultivation, oxidation and decomposition of phospholipids affected the fruits of plants grafted onto pumpkin rootstocks and the methylovalerate pathway was activated to synthesize cucurbitacins. This study enables a better understanding of the mechanisms of how bitter fruits are produced on plants grafted onto specific rootstocks. Grafting onto pumpkin rootstocks for summer production should be avoided and other special rootstocks should be selected and bred.

Supporting information

S1 Table [doc]
Information of different rootstocks.

S2 Table [doc]
Comparison of metabolites in fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong rootstocks and non-grafted plants.

S3 Table [doc]
Comparison of metabolites in fruits of plants grafted onto Ribenxuesong and muskmelon rootstocks.


Zdroje

1. Pitrat M. Melon genetic resources: phenotypic diversity and horticultural taxonomy. In: Grumet R, Katzir N, Garcia-Mas J, editors. Genetics and genomics of the Cucurbitaceae. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016. pp. 25–60.

2. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. html Cited 4 April 2019.

3. Kim HA, Shin A, Lee M, Lee H, Lee H, Ahn J, et al. De novo transcriptome analysis of Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa. Molecules and Cells. 2016; 39(2): 141–148. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.2264 26743902

4. Mascarell-Creus A, Cañizares J, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Mora-García S, Blanca J, Gonzalez-Ibeas D, et al. An oligo-based microarray offers novel transcriptomic approaches for the analysis of pathogen resistance and fruit quality traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.). BMC Genomics. 2009; 10(1): 467.

5. Ricardez-Salinas M, Huitron-Ramirez MV, Tello-Marquina JC, Camacho-Ferre F. Planting density for grafted melon as an alternative to methyl bromide use in Mexico. Scientia Horticulturae. 2010; 126(2): 236–241.

6. Aloni B, Cohen R, Karni L, Aktas H, Edelstein M. Hormonal signaling in rootstock–scion interactions. Scientia Horticulturae. 2010;127: 119–126.

7. Xiong M, Zhang X, Shabala S, Shabala L, Chen Y, Xiang C, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance and contributing ionic mechanism in nine Hami melon landraces in Xinjiang, China. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018; 237: 277–286.

8. Kumar P, Rana S, Sharma P, Negi V. Vegetable grafting: a boon to vegetable growers to combat biotic and abiotic stresses. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research. 2015; 41(2): 1–5.

9. Nawaz MA, Imtiaz M, Kong Q, Cheng F, Ahmed W, Huang Y, et al. Grafting: A Technique to Modify Ion Accumulation in Horticultural Crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016; 7:1457. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01457 27818663

10. Bie Z, Nawaz MA, Huang Y, Lee JM, Colla G. Introduction to Vegetable Grafting. In: Colla G, Alfocea FP, Schwarz D, editors. Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices. CABI Publishing, UK. 2017. pp. 1–21.

11. Rehm S, Enslin PR, Meeuse A, Wessels JH. Bitter principles of the Cucurbitaceae. VII.—the distribution of bitter principles in this plant family. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1957; 8: 679–686.

12. Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zeng J, Duan L, Xue X, Wang H, et al. Convergence and divergence of bitterness biosynthesis and regulation in Cucurbitaceae. Nature Plants. 2016; 2: 16183. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.183 27892922

13. Pittenger DR. California master gardener handbook. California: University of California. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication; 2002.

14. Shang Y, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Duan L, Chen H, et al. Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber. Science. 2014; 346(6213): 1084–1088. doi: 10.1126/science.1259215 25430763

15. Kano Y, Goto H, Fukuda H, Ishimoto K. Relationship between the occurrence of bitter fruit and nitrogen content, especially amino acid nitrogen and protein contents in the leaf and peel in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L., cv. Kagafutokyuri). Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science. 2001; 70: 438–442.

16. Kano Y, Goto H. Relationship between the occurrence of bitter fruit in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and the contents of total nitrogen, amino acid nitrogen, protein and HMG-CoA reductase activity. Scientia Horticulturae. 2003; 98(1): 1–8.

17. Cramer GR, Ergül A, Grimplet J, Tillett RL, Tattersall EA, Bohlman MC, et al. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2007; 7: 111–134.

18. Zuther E, Koehl K, Kopka J. Comparative metabolome analysis of the salt response in breeding cultivars of rice. In: Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Dordrecht: Springer Publishing Company; 2007. pp. 285–315.

19. Zhao L, Huang Y, Hu J, Zhou H, Adeleye AS, Keller AA, et al. 1H NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics reveal defense and detoxification mechanism of cucumber plant under nano-Cu stress. Environmental Science & Technology. 2016; 50(4): 2000–2010.

20. Meng J, Wang B, He G, Wang Y, Tang X, Wang S, et al. Metabolomics integrated with transcriptomics reveals redirection of the phenylpropanoids Metabolic flux in Ginkgo biloba. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2019; 67(11): 3284–3291. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06355 30802049

21. Horie H, Ito H, Ippoushi K, Azuma K, Sakata Y, Igarashi I. Cucurbitacin C—Bitter principle in cucumber plants. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: 2007; 41(1): 65–68.

22. Mukherjee PK, Nema NK, Maity N, Sarkar BK. Phytochemical and therapeutic potential of cucumber. Fitoterapia. 2013; 84: 227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.10.003 23098877

23. Rymal KS, Chambliss OL, Bond MD, Smith DA. Squash containing toxic cucurbitacin compounds occurring in California and Alabama. Journal of Food Protection. 1984; 47(4): 270–271. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-47.4.270 30921968

24. Sun OC, Yong JK, Sang UP. An updated review of cucurbitacins and their biological and pharmacological activities. EXCLI Journal 2015; 14:562–566. doi: 10.17179/excli2015-283 26648815

25. Meijer HJ, Munnik T. Phospholipid-based signaling in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2003; 54(1): 265–306.

26. Jacob T, Ritchie S, Assmann SM, Gilroy S. Abscisic acid signal transduction in guard cells is mediated by phospholipase D activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999; 96(21): 12192–12197.

27. Katagiri T, Takahashi S, Shinozaki K. Involvement of a novel Arabidopsis phospholipase D, AtPLDδ, in dehydration‐inducible accumulation of phosphatidic acid in stress signalling. The Plant Journal. 2001; 26(6): 595–605. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01060.x 11489173

28. Li W, Wang R, Li M, Li L, Wang C, Welti R, et al. Differential degradation of extraplastidic and plastidic lipids during freezing and post-freezing recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008; 283(1): 461–468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706692200 17962199

29. Drøbak BK, Watkins PA. Inositol (1, 4, 5) trisphosphate production in plant cells: an early response to salinity and hyperosmotic stress. FEBS Letters. 2000; 481(9): 240–244.

30. Samanta A, Das G, Das SK. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Carbon.2011;100(6): 12–35.

31. Mola J, Grotewold E, Koes R. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends in Plant Science. 1998; 3(6): 212–217.

32. Wu Y, Chen Y, Zhao Y. Effect of pumpkin stocks on growth, development, yield and quality of drafted muskmelon. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2006; 21(4):354–369.

33. Wu Y, Zhao Y. The physiological influence on grafted muskmelon of different pumpkin stocks. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2007; 23(11):253–256.

34. Catalá A. Lipid peroxidation of membrane phospholipids generates hydroxy-alkenals and oxidized phospholipids active in physiological and/or pathological conditions. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2009; 157: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2008.09.004 18977338

35. Reis A, Spickett CM. Chemistry of phospholipid oxidation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2012; 1818: 2374–2387.

36. Leshem YY. Membrane phospholipid catabolism and Ca2+ activity in control of senescence. Physiologia Plantarum. 1987; 69(3): 551–559.Leshem YY. Membrane phospholipid catabolism and Ca2+ activity in control of senescence. Physiologia Plantarum. 1987; 69(3): 551–559.

37. Gershenzon J. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1994; 20(6): 1281–1328. doi: 10.1007/BF02059810 24242341


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

plice
INSIGHTS from European Respiratory Congress
nový kurz

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii
Autoři: MUDr. Ladislav Korábek, CSc., MBA

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Petr Němec, Ph.D.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#