Modeling succinate dehydrogenase loss disorders in C. elegans through effects on hypoxia-inducible factor
Authors:
Megan M. Braun aff001; Tamara Damjanac aff001; Yuxia Zhang aff001; Chuan Chen aff001; Jinghua Hu aff001; L. James Maher, III aff001
Authors place of work:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, United States of America
aff001
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227033
Summary
Mitochondrial disorders arise from defects in nuclear genes encoding enzymes of oxidative metabolism. Mutations of metabolic enzymes in somatic tissues can cause cancers due to oncometabolite accumulation. Paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma are examples, whose etiology and therapy are complicated by the absence of representative cell lines or animal models. These tumors can be driven by loss of the tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme succinate dehydrogenase. We exploit the relationship between succinate accumulation, hypoxic signaling, egg-laying behavior, and morphology in C. elegans to create genetic and pharmacological models of succinate dehydrogenase loss disorders. With optimization, these models may enable future high-throughput screening efforts.
Keywords:
Enzymes – Sequence assembly tools – Phenotypes – Caenorhabditis elegans – RNA interference – Drug metabolism – Library screening – Enzyme metabolism
Introduction
Mitochondrial disorders can result from mutations affecting enzymes of oxidative metabolism [1–4]. Interestingly and surprisingly, some cancers are caused by gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations of genes encoding metabolic enzymes in susceptible tissues [5]. For example, paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma (PPGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors [6–8] that originate in the parasympathetic and sympathetic ganglia, are highly angiogenic, and may secrete catecholamines. Up to 30% of PPGL tumors are hereditary [9].
All four subunits of the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) have been identified as tumor suppressors in familial PPGL[10–13], with loss of heterozygosity accounting for tumorigenesis. The succinate accumulation hypothesis attributes tumorigenesis following SDH loss to an oncometabolite role for excess succinate [14]. Loss-of-function mutations of SDH subunits lead to dysfunctional complexes [15, 16]. The resulting TCA cycle dysfunction drives metabolic remodeling with dependence on glycolysis [17] and a profound accumulation of succinate as defective SDH cannot oxidize this dicarboxylic acid to fumarate. Excess succinate acts as a competitive inhibitor of enzymes belonging to the 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family. This family of iron-dependent enzymes, numbering more than 40 in humans [18], catalyzes oxidation reactions splitting molecular oxygen to incorporate one oxygen atom into the substrate with oxidative decarboxylation of co-substrate, 2-ketoglutarate, to form succinate [19].
Since many enzymes belong to the 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family, there are many potential consequences of succinate accumulation upon SDH loss [20]. One susceptible enzyme of interest is HIF-α prolyl-hydroxylase (PHD), which participates in the oxygen sensing mechanism of animals. Under normoxic conditions, PHD hydroxylates HIF-α transcription factor subunits, marking the proteins for polyubiquitination by von Hippel-Lindau protein and eventual degradation by the proteasome [21]. Under hypoxic conditions, molecular oxygen is limiting so the PHD-catalyzed dioxygenase reaction slows and HIF-α subunits avoid degradation and translocate to the nucleus to interact with constitutively-expressed HIF-β. The resulting transcription factors activate genes driving angiogenesis and glycolysis to adapt to hypoxia. High levels of succinate inhibit PHD, creating a pseudohypoxic condition that is hypothesized to be tumorigenic in susceptible cell types [14]. It remains unknown how succinate poisoning of PHD and/or other 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases drives tumorigenesis. In the absence of rodent models and SDH-loss PPGL cell lines, understanding the linkage between SDH loss and tumorigenesis is an urgent and unmet need.
Our limited understanding of the mechanistic impact of SDH loss on cellular processes and tumorigenesis has thwarted PPGL therapeutic advances. We therefore sought to establish a C. elegans model embodying genetic and biochemical aspects of SDH-loss disorders including PPGL. The soil nematode C. elegans provides an inexpensive, easily-maintained, genetically-tractable model organism with a fully-sequenced genome [22, 23]. Moreover, fully 40% of genes known to be associated with human diseases have clear C. elegans orthologs. For example, while humans have three HIFα subunits (HIF-1α, HIF-2 α, and HIF-3α) encoded by three separate genes, C. elegans has only a single hif-1 α gene, facilitating conclusive genetic analysis [24]. In principle, changes in C. elegans phenotype or behavior associated with mutations related to SDH and HIF function could create models for high-throughput screening of compounds that suppress or exacerbate these characteristics in intact animals. Whole-animal suppression screens have the advantage of simultaneously monitoring efficacy and toxicity.
Inspiration for a C. elegans model of the molecular changes associated with SDH-loss disorders such as PPGL came from the previous fascinating observation that mutation of egl-9(sa307), the C. elegans ortholog of human PHD, unexpectedly causes increased egg retention in hermaphrodite worms [25]. In retrospect, it seems likely that oxygen-sensing in egg-laying behavior is adaptive, suppressing egg-laying in inhospitable environments. The egg-laying defect is HIF-1-dependent, as egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4) double mutants and hif-1(ia4) single mutants both exhibit normal egg laying behavior [26].
Here we exploit HIF-1-dependent egg retention to create C. elegans models of SDH-loss human PPGL. We hypothesized that cellular changes impinging on the C. elegans HIF pathway should be revealed in the egg retention phenotype because, as noted, succinate accumulation upon SDH loss inhibits PHD activity. To investigate this, we utilized both genetic (cell-specific gene expression or knockdown) and pharmacological [treatment with dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG), a cell-permeable succinate analog] approaches. Further, we report a novel image-based readout of worm morphology with the potential to monitor egg retention phenotypes more efficiently in drug screening. With further optimization, this work suggests a path toward future screening for non-toxic small molecules that suppress the egg retention phenotype caused by succinate inhibition of EGL-9. Such agents might function to therapeutically relieve succinate inhibition of 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases in PPGL and other SDH-loss disorders.
Materials and methods
Strains and maintenance
Previously described C. elegans strains utilized in this study include N2, JT307 egl-9 (sa307), CB6088 egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4), and ZG31 hif-1(ia4). These strains were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center.
C. elegans were grown and maintained on nematode growth media (NGM) agar seeded with E. coli OP50 at room temperature unless otherwise noted. Standard alkaline sodium hypochlorite treatment was used to establish synchronous populations of worms for egg counting and imaging studies. For egg counting studies, individual worms were placed in bleach droplets and eggs were counted after cuticle dissolution [27]. Media components were obtained from Sigma.
Generation of transgenic lines
The C. elegans Punc-31 promoter was used to drive expression of Hif transgenes or RNA interference constructs for SDH subunit knockdown, allowing these effects to be limited to neurons known to be important for egg-laying. DNA oligonucleotides were obtained from IDT. Punc-31 was amplified by PCR from C. elegans genomic DNA (forward primer sequence 5’-AACAACTTGGAAATGAAATACGAGAACTTAAACCATTAAA; reverse primer sequence 5’-GACCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTGATGTTCCAAACGAAGACTG) and Gibson assembly was used to insert Punc-31 into HindIII-linearized pPD95_75. Following ligation and cloning, the resulting plasmid was linearized by BamHI cleavage 30 bp downstream from the Punc-31 insertion and egl-9(+) coding sequence that had been amplified by PCR from genomic DNA (forward primer sequence 5’- CCTGCAGGTCGACTCTAGAGCACATGACATGAGCAGTGCCCCAAATGA; reverse primer sequence 5’-CTTTGGCCAATCCCGGGGATCGATGTAATACTCTGGGTTTG) or hif-1(+) coding sequence that had been amplified by PCR from genomic DNA (forward primer sequence 5’-CCTGCAGGTCGACTCTAGAGATCAAGATGGAAGACAATCG; reverse primer sequence 5’- CTTTGGCCAATCCCGGGGATCAGAGAGCATTGGAAATGGGG) was inserted using a second round of Gibson assembly. Constructs jhuEx[Punc-31::EGL-9] and jhuEx[Punc-31::HIF-1] were co-injected into adult hermaphrodite egl-9(sa307) and egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4) worms, respectively, along with plasmid pRF4 encoding a mutant collagen (rol-6(su1006)) that induces a dominant "roller" phenotype [28, 29]. Importantly, in preliminary experiments it was demonstrated that the rol-6 marker does not affect egg-laying behavior or egg retention.
Punc-31 was amplified by PCR with using a different set pair of primers (forward primer sequence 5’- ATGACCATGATTACGCCACGAGAACTTAAACCATTAAATA; reverse primer sequence 5’-CCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTGATGTTCCAAACGAAGACTGCA) for Gibson assembly into HindIII-linearized pPD49_78. Sense and antisense domains of a 496-bp region of the C. elegans sdhb-1 gene were assembled from appropriate primers by PCR from genomic DNA targeting parts of exons 1 and 3 (44 and 121 bp respectively) and all of exon 2 (sense forward primer sequence 5’- AGCTTGCATGCCTGCAATCGTTTCAACCCAGAAGCACCAG; sense reverse primer sequence 5’- CAAAGTGTGGCTGAACGTGACACGTTCAGCCACACTTTGG; antisense forward primer sequence 5’- CCAAGTGTGGCTGAACGTGTCACGTTCAGCCACACTTTG; antisense reverse primer sequence 5’- GATCCTCTAGAGTCGACCTCGTTTCAACCCAGAAGCACCA). Sbf1 was used to linearize the resulting plasmid 16 bp downstream from the Punc-31 insertion. A second round of Gibson assembly was used to insert the sense and antisense sdhb-1 segments into the SbfI-linearized plasmid, forming an inverted repeat encoding a long RNA hairpin for RNA interference. The resulting plasmid jhuEx[Punc-31::sdhb-1(IR)] was co-injected with pBX into adult hermaphrodite N2 worms.
DMOG treatment
After synchronization, worm concentration was approximated by counting the number of worms in ten 10-μL drops of medium. Culture volume was diluted to 100 worms/mL. One mL of culture was then added to each well of a 12-well plate. OP50 bacteria were added at 5 mg/mL. Plates were sealed with an aluminum plate sealer and transferred to a room temperature shaker.
Worms received the first treatment with dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; Sigma), a water-soluble succinate analog, approximately four hours after culture initiation. On the following days, DMOG was added and replenished twice daily at 8-hour intervals to account for spontaneous hydrolysis. It was assumed that each dose of compound was hydrolyzed during each interval, so DMOG treatment concentration is termed “nominal.”
Acquisition and analysis of C. elegans images
C. elegans worms were transferred from liquid culture onto clean NGM plates and rinsed with s-complete medium. Adults were manually separated from larvae with a worm pick onto fresh NGM plates. Digital brightfield images were obtained manually using a Leica DMi1 camera using the 10x objective and converted to grayscale tiff files using Adobe Photoshop. WormSizer [30], an open source plugin compatible with Fiji [31], was used to obtain length and width measurements for each imaged animal.
Statistical analysis
Values are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation for the indicated number of independent experiments. The statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test or a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with post-hoc Tukey HSD, or a Dunnett’s test with R Studio software. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Cell-specific knockdown of SDHB-1 leads to increased egg retention in N2 worms
We set out to determine whether C. elegans can be used as a genetic model of the SDH-loss cells present in human mitochondrial disorders including familial PPGL tumors. RNAi screens have shown that systemic knockdown of any of the four SDH subunits (SDHx) is embryonic lethal in C. elegans [32, 33], as in mammals. Seeking screenable phenotypes associated with SDH loss in worms, it was therefore necessary to limit SDHx knockdown to a subpopulation of cells consistent with viability. We hypothesized that egg-laying behavior controlled by EGL-9 would be sensitive to succinate accumulation such that succinate inhibition of EGL-9 would phenocopy EGL-9 loss and drive egg retention. The unc-31 promoter (Punc-31) was selected to drive expression of test genes because this promoter has been shown to be active in neurons, including those believed to be responsible for egg laying [34]. To test this, we constructed two transgenic lines based on known egg-laying behavior. Hermaphrodite worms homozygous for the egl-9(sa307) mutation retain eggs. We found that Punc-31-driven expression of functional EGL-9 in egl-9(sa307) mutants significantly relieved egg retention from egl-9(sa307) mutant levels (P<2.62e-14) to near wild type levels (mean eggs per worm are 14.2 and 12.7 respectively; P = 0.007; Fig 1A). Likewise, Punc-31-driven expression of wild type hif-1(+) in egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4) hermaphrodites increased egg retention significantly above wild type and egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4) double mutants levels (P<2.62e-14 for both cases; Fig 1B). These results demonstrate that the unc-31 promoter defines a cell compartment that controls egg-laying behavior. We considered if the more limited neuroendocrine cell compartment defined by tdc-1 promoter (Ptdc-1) activity might also be adequate to control egg-laying behavior. Ptdc-1 activity is thought to be limited primarily to the four uv1 neuroendocrine cells of C. elegans, known to play a prominent role in hormonal control of egg laying. Interestingly, in contrast to Punc-31, we found that Ptdc-1-driven expression of functional hif-1(+) in egl-9(sa307):hif-1(ia4) mutants was inadequate to induce egg retention (data not shown). It is unknown whether this result is due to the tissue restriction of Ptdc-1 or its strength.
Based on these results, Punc-31 was chosen to drive cell-specific knockdown of SDHB-1 by RNA interference after injection of a plasmid containing an sdhb-1 inverted repeat (IR) under the control of Punc-31. Disruption of the SDH complex in unc-31-expressing cells is hypothesized to mimic essential biochemical phenotypes of SDH-loss disorders such as PPGL. Three stable worm lines were generated. After synchronization, all individuals carrying the sdhb-1 RNAi transgene showed increased egg retention relative to controls (Fig 2). This result demonstrates for the first time that SDH function in Punc-31-positive cells is necessary for normal egg-laying behavior. We hypothesize that SDH knockdown results in intracellular succinate accumulation, known to inhibit 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases such as EGL-9. According to this model, EGL-9 inhibition prevents HIF-1 hydroxylation, stabilizing HIF-1 and promoting HIF-1 signaling and egg retention behavior in C. elegans. We note that global succinate accumulation in whole worms is not expected for SDH knockdown under these conditions, as effects would be limited to the small subset of cells where Punc-31 is active.
DMOG treatment increases egg retention in N2 worms
To test the hypothesis that succinate accumulation alone is sufficient to drive egg retention in C. elegans, we studied egg-laying behavior in the presence of dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG), a cell-permeable succinate analog. DMOG is the prodrug of N-oxalylglycine (NOG), which is known to inhibit 2-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases but is unable to permeate cell membranes [35]. Previous studies have shown that mammalian cells treated with DMOG show an increase in transcription of HIF-1-responsive genes [36]. Consistent with our observations for sdhb-1 knockdown, treatment of C. elegans hermaphrodites with DMOG induced egg retention in wild type N2 worms, but not in hif-1(ia4) worms (Fig 3). The implications of these results are two-fold. First, DMOG-induced egg retention in N2 worms provides a second SDH-loss PPGL model based on a cell-permeable metabolite analog. Second, the inability of DMOG to affect egg laying in hif-1(ia4) mutants demonstrates the HIF-1-dependence of this chemical mechanism of egg retention in N2 worms. This observation supports a model attributing egg retention in N2 worms to increased HIF-1 signaling resulting from DMOG inhibition of EGL-9.
DMOG treatment alters N2 worm body morphology
C. elegans egg retention studies are commonly performed manually either by observing the eggs in an intact animal or after dissolving the cuticle in sodium hypochlorite and counting the eggs in resistant clutches [27]. To more quickly gather egg retention data in a manner that might be optimized in the future for possible high-throughput screening of agents that alter this phenotype, we sought a quantitative surrogate for egg retention. Assays of chitinase release have previously been reported for this purpose[37], but were found to be too variable and imprecise for our purpose. Changes in body morphology were then considered because egg retention might reasonably be expected to affect girth. The WormSizer software tool was used to collect a variety of measurements from brightfield images comparing synchronized untreated and DMOG-treated N2 worms [30]. As hypothesized, DMOG treatment was observed to increase the girth of worms, and this effect was dose-dependent (Fig 4A). Intriguingly, DMOG treatment also decreased length of N2 worms in a dose-dependent manner due to unknown mechanisms (Fig 4B). Thus, DMOG-treated worms were both wider and shorter than normal as evidenced by a reproducible dose-dependent decrease in width:length ratio (Fig 4C). This observation suggests that optimization could lead to a new image-based screening approach for phenotypes related in egg retention in C. elegans.
Discussion
There is increasing interest in understanding disorders caused by cellular metabolite imbalances [18]. Of particular importance to us are cancers driven by alteration of metabolic enzymes, resulting in accumulation of dicarboxylates such as succinate, fumarate, and 2-hydroxyglutarate. These oncometabolites inhibit 2-ketoglutarate-dependent enzymes important for many aspects of cell regulation, including hypoxic response, and epigenetic regulation through demethylation of histones, DNA, and RNA [38, 39]. Studies to develop potential therapies for SDH-loss disorders, including familial PPGL, have been limited by the absence of cell and animal models of the SDH-loss condition [40]. We have previously exploited SDH-loss yeast models for drug screening to identify vulnerabilities induced by SDH loss and succinate accumulation [41]. Here we envision a different approach–the potential for a suppression screen in intact C. elegans worms where a measurable quantitate phenotype reflects oncometabolite accumulation. Such a system would allow screening of drug libraries for non-toxic agents that suppress the phenotype driven by SDH loss and succinate accumulation. Such agents might function by preventing or discharging succinate accumulation.
Toward this end we report both genetic and chemical C. elegans models that link quantifiable egg-laying phenotypes to SDH loss and succinate accumulation. These models include egg retention secondary to SDH loss in Punc31+ cells, and egg retention secondary to whole-body treatment with succinate analog DMOG. We further show that worm body morphology changes in a dose-dependent manner with DMOG treatment, paralleling egg retention, and providing a possible future approach for high-content image screening of worm phenotypes if the methodologies can be optimized. These results and their interpretations are summarized in Fig 5.
The results described here open the possibility that C. elegans can be applied after future assay optimization to high-throughput screening of chemical libraries for non-toxic agents that suppress effects of SDH loss and succinate accumulation. Such agents would reveal druggable pathways that might be altered to block oncometabolite effects in cancers of interest.
Zdroje
1. Hoekstra AS, Bayley J-P. The role of complex II in disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Bioenergetics. 2013;1827(5):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.11.005.
2. Quintana A, Kruse SE, Kapur RP, Sanz E, Palmiter RD. Complex I deficiency due to loss of Ndufs4 in the brain results in progressive encephalopathy resembling Leigh syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(24):10996–1001. papers3://publication/. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006214107 20534480
3. Rustin P, Bourgeron T, Parfait B, Chretien D, Munnich A, Rotig A. Inborn errors of the Krebs cycle: a group of unusual mitochondrial diseases in human. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1361(2):185–97. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(97)00035-5 9300800.
4. Rustin P, Munnich A, Rötig A. Succinate dehydrogenase and human diseases: new insights into a well-known enzyme. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10(5):289–91. papers3://publication/. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200793 12082502
5. Thompson CB. Metabolic Enzymes as Oncogenes or Tumor Suppressors. New England J Med. 2009;360(8):813–5.
6. Baysal BE. Hereditary paraganglioma targets diverse paraganglia. J Med Genet. 2002;39(9):617–22. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.9.617 12205103.
7. Her YF, Maher LJ 3rd. Succinate Dehydrogenase Loss in Familial Paraganglioma: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Epigenetics. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:296167. doi: 10.1155/2015/296167 26294907; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4532907.
8. Berends AMA, Buitenwerf E, de Krijger RR, Veeger NJGM, van der Horst-Schrivers ANA, Links TP, et al. Incidence of pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma in the Netherlands: A nationwide study and systematic review. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018;51:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.015 29361475
9. Favier J, Amar L, Gimenez-Roqueplo A-P. Paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma: from genetics to personalized medicine. Nature Publishing Group. 2014;11(2):101–11. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.188 papers2://publication
10. Burnichon N, Briere JJ, Libe R, Vescovo L, Riviere J, Tissier F, et al. SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Human Mol Gen. 2010;19(15):3011–20.
11. Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, Dahia PL, Douglas F, George E, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(1):49–54. doi: 10.1086/321282 11404820.
12. Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, Lawrence EC, Myssiorek D, Bosch A, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287(5454):848–51. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848 10657297.
13. Niemann S, Muller U. Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet. 2000;26(3):268–70. doi: 10.1038/81551 11062460.
14. Selak MA, Armour SM, MacKenzie ED, Boulahbel H, Watson DG, Mansfield KD, et al. Succinate links TCA cycle dysfunction to oncogenesis by inhibiting HIF-alpha prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.022 15652751.
15. Bezawork-Geleta A, Rohlena J, Dong L, Pacak K, Neuzil J. Mitochondrial Complex II: At the Crossroads. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2017;42(4):312–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.003 28185716
16. Bezawork-Geleta A, Wen H, Dong L, Yan B, Vider J, Boukalova S, et al. Alternative assembly of respiratory complex II connects energy stress to metabolic checkpoints. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):2221. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04603-z 29880867
17. Lussey-Lepoutre C, Hollinshead KER, Ludwig C, Menara M, Morin A, Castro-Vega LJ, et al. Loss of succinate dehydrogenase activity results in dependency on pyruvate carboxylation for cellular anabolism. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8784–. papers2://publication/. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9784 26522426
18. Kaelin WG Jr., McKnight SL. Influence of metabolism on epigenetics and disease. Cell. 2013;153(1):56–69. Epub 2013/04/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.004 23540690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3775362.
19. Solomon EI, Brunold TC, Davis MI, Kemsley JN, Lee S-K, Lehnert N, et al. Geometric and Electronic Structure/Function Correlations in Non-Heme Iron Enzymes. Chemical reviews. 2000;100(1):235–350. doi: 10.1021/cr9900275 11749238
20. Xiao M, Yang H, Xu W, Ma S, Lin H, Zhu H, et al. Inhibition of alpha-KG-dependent histone and DNA demethylases by fumarate and succinate that are accumulated in mutations of FH and SDH tumor suppressors. Genes Dev. 2012;26(12):1326–38. doi: 10.1101/gad.191056.112 22677546; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3387660.
21. Ivan M, Kondo K, Yang H, Kim W, Valiando J, Ohh M, et al. HIFα Targeted for VHL-Mediated Destruction by Proline Hydroxylation: Implications for O<sub>2</sub> Sensing. Science. 2001;292(5516):464. doi: 10.1126/science.1059817 11292862
22. Corsi AK. A biochemist's guide to Caenorhabditis elegans. Analytical biochemistry. 2006;359(1):1–17. Epub 2006/08/11. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.033 16942745.
23. Kaletta T, Hengartner MO. Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2006;5(5):387–99. doi: 10.1038/nrd2031 16672925
24. Jiang H, Guo R, Powell-Coffman JA. The Caenorhabditis elegans hif-1 gene encodes a bHLH-PAS protein that is required for adaptation to hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(14):7916–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141234698 11427734
25. Trent C, Tsuing N, Horvitz HR. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1983;104(4):619–47. 11813735.
26. Bishop T, Lau KW, Epstein AC, Kim SK, Jiang M, O'Rourke D, et al. Genetic analysis of pathways regulated by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS biology. 2004;2(10):e289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020289 15361934
27. Au—Gardner M, Au—Rosell M, Au—Myers EM. Measuring the Effects of Bacteria on C. Elegans Behavior Using an Egg Retention Assay. JoVE. 2013;(80):e51203. doi: 10.3791/51203 24192811
28. Kramer A. The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:367–409. Epub 1996/01/01. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002055 8811184.
29. Mello CC, Kramer JM, Stinchcomb D, Ambros V. Efficient gene transfer in C.elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 1991;10(12):3959–70. Epub 1991/12/01. 1935914; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC453137.
30. Moore BT, Jordan JM, Baugh LR. WormSizer: high-throughput analysis of nematode size and shape. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57142. Epub 2013/03/02. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057142 23451165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3579787.
31. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. Epub 2012/06/30. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 22743772; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3855844.
32. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, Gotta M, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421(6920):231–7. doi: 10.1038/nature01278 12529635
33. Woods S, Coghlan A, Rivers D, Warnecke T, Jeffries SJ, Kwon T, et al. Duplication and Retention Biases of Essential and Non-Essential Genes Revealed by Systematic Knockdown Analyses. PLOS Genetics. 2013;9(5):e1003330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003330 23675306
34. Chang AJ, Bargmann CI. Hypoxia and the HIF-1 transcriptional pathway reorganize a neuronal circuit for oxygen-dependent behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(20):7321–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802164105 18477695
35. Fets L, Driscoll P, Grimm F, Jain A, M. Nunes P, Gounis M, et al. MCT2 mediates concentration-dependent inhibition of glutamine metabolism by MOG2018. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0136-y 30297875
36. Platero-Luengo A, González-Granero S, Durán R, Díaz-Castro B, Piruat José I, García-Verdugo José M, et al. An O2-Sensitive Glomus Cell-Stem Cell Synapse Induces Carotid Body Growth in Chronic Hypoxia. Cell. 2014;156(1):291–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.013
37. Ellerbrock BR. Screening for Presenilin Inhibitors Using the Free-Living Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of biomolecular screening. 2004;9(2):147–52. doi: 10.1177/1087057103261038://publication/doi/10.1177/1087057103261038 15006138
38. Her YF, Maher LJ. Succinate Dehydrogenase Loss in Familial Paraganglioma: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Epigenetics. Int J Endocrin. 2015;2015(11):1–14. papers2://publication doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.017
39. Her YF, Nelson-Holte M, Maher LJ 3rd. Oxygen concentration controls epigenetic effects in models of familial paraganglioma. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127471 25985299; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4436181.
40. Lepoutre-Lussey C, Thibault C, Buffet A, Morin A, Badoual C, Benit P, et al. From Nf1 to Sdhb knockout: Successes and failures in the quest for animal models of pheochromocytoma. 2015:1–9. papers3://publication doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.06.027
41. Bancos I, Bida JP, Tian D, Bundrick M, John K, Holte MN, et al. High-throughput screening for growth inhibitors using a yeast model of familial paraganglioma. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056827 23451094; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3579935.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts
Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova
Všechny kurzy