Analyses with double knockouts of the Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b genes demonstrate that BMP signaling is involved in the formation of precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei derived from the rhombic lip
Authors:
Lihua Qin aff001; Kyung J. Ahn aff001; Lara Wine Lee aff001; Charles de Charleroy, Jr aff001; E. Bryan Crenshaw, III aff001
Authors place of work:
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Mammalian Neurogenetics Group, Center for Childhood Communication, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
aff001; Department of Anatomy and Histoembryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
aff002; Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
aff003; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
aff004
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226602
Summary
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been hypothesized to specify distinct dorsal neural fates. During neural development, BMPs are expressed in the roof plate and adjacent neuroepithelium. Because several hindbrain nuclei that form the proprioceptive/vestibular/auditory sensory network originate from the rhombic lip, near the roof plate, BMP signaling may regulate the development of these nuclei. To test this hypothesis genetically, we have examined the development of the hindbrain in BMP type I receptor knockout mice. Our results demonstrate that BMP signaling is involved in the formation of precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei, which give rise to cerebellar mossy fibers, but is not required for the development of the inferior olivary nucleus, which gives rise to cerebellar climbing fibers.
Keywords:
Gene expression – Neurons – Nerve fibers – BMP signaling – Cerebellum – Auditory pathway – Hindbrain – Climbing fibers
Introduction
The embryonic rhombic lip is a specialized germinative epithelium that arises at the interface between the neural tube and the roof plate of the fourth ventricle. Neuronal precursors generated in the rhombic lip undertake long distance migration to widely dispersed destinations, giving rise to neural cell types in the vestibular/auditory/cerebellar systems [1–3]. Classically, the rhombic lip has been divided into rostral (anterior/upper) and caudal (posterior/lower) parts. Neuronal cell types of the cerebellum and rostral hindbrain originate in the rostral rhombic lip [4–7]. In addition to the cochlear and vestibular nuclei, neurons originating in the caudal rhombic lip form the precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei [3, 8–13]. There are five precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei: the pontine gray (PN) and reticulotegmental nuclei (RtTg), located in the pons; the inferior olivary nucleus (ION), the external cuneate (ECu) and lateral reticular nuclei (LRt), located in the medulla [8–11]. The pontine gray and reticulotegmental nuclei are derived from rhombomeres 6–8, and the other precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei are derived from rhombomeres 7–8 [3]. Axons from these nuclei form the two major inputs into the cerebellum, namely, the mossy and climbing fibers.
The rhombic lip has a dorsal-ventral graded expression of Wnt1 [14, 15]. The pre-cerebellar progenitor neurons originate within the Wnt1 expressing caudal rhombic lip and are spatially and molecularly defined. The mossy fiber precerebellar neurons which populate the PN, RtTg, ECu, and LRt originate from the dorsal domain of the caudal rhombic lip specified by high expression of Wnt1 and the expression of Atoh1, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor [3, 6, 8–11, 14–18]. Mutations in the Atoh1 gene result in the loss of precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei from which the mossy fiber input to the cerebellum originate [19]. Climbing fiber neurons which contribute to the ION are derived from a more ventral domain of the caudal rhombic lip which expresses a low level of Wnt1 and also expresses Ptf1a (pancreatic transcription factor 1a) [2,3, 9, 18, 20–25]. The Pft1a null mutant lacks the ION, which form climbing fiber neurons, but not the other precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei [23]. These data demonstrate that the initial dorsal-ventral patterning of the rhombic lip plays a crucial role in specifying cell types in the precerebellar system. For this reason, we have characterized the development of the precerebellar system in mouse mutants that abrogate BMP signaling–a signaling pathway that plays crucial roles in dorsal-ventral patterning in the neural tube [25, 26].
BMP gene family members, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily, regulate a number of cell processes during development, including differentiation, cell growth, apoptosis, cell-fate determination, and morphogenesis [27,28]. BMPs are expressed in the roof plate and in the adjacent dorsal neural tube [25, 29, 30]. Therefore, they have been hypothesized to play a role in regulating the development of the rhombic lip and its derivatives, including the precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei. BMPs have been shown to signal via hetero-oligomeric complexes of transmembrane serine/threonine kinase type I and type II receptors [26, 31–33]. The BMP type I receptors Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b directly phosphorylate the Smad proteins [34, 35]. The genes for these BMP type I receptors are expressed widely throughout most of neural tube development during every stage of development [36,37]. Bmpr1a is expressed extensively throughout development, whereas Bmpr1b is expressed in a more limited, but still widespread distribution [36,37]. To genetically characterize the functions of BMP signaling during mouse neural tube development, we have generated a strain of mutant mice containing a double knockout of the genes encoding the BMP receptor-IA and BMP receptor-IB subunits (Bmpr1a;Bmpr1b mutant mice, which we refer to as Bmpr double knockout mice). Our results demonstrate that BMP signaling through Wnt1 is involved in the development of precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei that contribute to the mossy fiber inputs into the cerebellum, but not the inferior olivary nucleus, the precerebellar nucleus that contributes climbing fiber inputs.
Methods
Mouse strains
The Bmpr1a conditional knockout mice were generated as described previously [38, 39]. Briefly, a floxed allele of the Bmpr1a gene was conditionally inactivated with the Bcre-32 pedigree. In this pedigree, expression of the Cre recombinase gene was driven by the neural tube enhancer transcriptional regulatory elements of the POU-domain gene, Brn4/Pou3f4, Tg(Pou3f4-cre)32Cren, which we will refer to as Bcre-32 [40]. Bmpr1b null mutants, a classical knockout, were a kind gift from Karen Lyons [41]. BMP signaling mutants containing double knockouts of the Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b genes were generated as described previously [40]. Briefly, a floxed allele of the Bmpr1a gene is conditionally inactivated in the neural tube by the Bcre-32 transgene in a background containing the Bmpr1b homozygous knockout.
To examine the expression domain induced by the Bcre-32 transgenic, the transgenic line was crossed to the Gt(ROSA)26Sor reporter strain, which we will refer to as the ROSA reporter strain. Gt(ROSA)26Sor was developed as a gene-trap allele whose expression can be activated in all cells in the mouse in which the floxed allele is activated [42].
Ethics statement
The experimental design used in these studies was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (IACUC protocol #588).
Tissue preparation
Embryos were staged by designating the morning of the vaginal plug as 0.5 dpc (days post-coitus). Whole brains were dissected and washed in cold PBS, followed by fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight. Embryos were treated with 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C overnight, embedded in OCT compound (Tissue Tek), and cryosectioned at a thickness of 25 μm for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry analyses. Newborn mice were anesthetized, transcardiacally perfused with 0.1M PBS pH 7.3, followed by perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Subsequently, the brains were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight. Yolk sacs or tails were collected prior to fixation for DNA extraction and genotyping by PCR analysis. Primers for genotyping the alleles of Bmpr1a, Bmpr1b, and Bcre-32 were described previously [40]. For paraffin sections, fixed brains were dehydrated and processed through paraffin and embedded via standard procedures. Tissue sections (7 μm) were used for histological analysis.
In situ hybridization
Digoxygenin-labeled RNA probes were synthesized as run-off transcripts from linearized plasmid templates using RNA polymerases (T3, T7, and Sp6) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche). The following antisense probes were used: Atoh1(gift of J. Johnson), Barhl1 (IMAGE clone 335997 linearized with StuI), Ngn2 (gift of D. Anderson), Pax6 (gift of M. Goulding), Ptf1a (IMAGE clone 5942372 linearized with PstI) and Rph3a (IMAGE clone 5698459 linearized with XbaI). In situ hybridization was accomplished as previously described [40, 43]. Three to five animals from each age and genotype were examined.
Immunohistochemistry and histology
Single-label immunohistochemistry was performed by incubating overnight at 4°C with a rabbit anti-Zic 1/2 antibody (1:400, a gift from Rosalind Segal, Dana Farber Cancer Institute). Double-label immunohistochemistry was performed using a mouse monoclonal anti-TAG-1/4D7(1:50, DSHB) with a rabbit anti-Zic 1/2 (1:400) by incubating overnight in PBS/2% goat serum/0.1% Triton X-100. Fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies consisting of goat anti-rabbit IgG rhodamine and goat anti-mouse IgM FITC (Jackson Immunoresearch) were used. Following a final wash with PBS, nuclei were visualized by staining with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Sigma).
Phospho-Smad immunohistochemical analyses were accomplished using previously published methods [38, 40]. Lhx1/5, Pax2 double-immunolabel immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described [40]. For these double-label analyses, sections from the hindbrain region caudal to the otic vesicle–corresponding to a region of the hindbrain derived from rhombomere 6—was analyzed, and the pattern of Lhx1/5 and Pax2 expression was used to confirm the identity of the sections [44]. Histological analyses of neonatal mice brains were performed on paraffin sections using Nissl staining and staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Staining for lacZ expression using X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-galactopyranoside) was accomplished as described previously [45]. Three to five animals from each age and genotype were examined.
Apoptosis and cell proliferation in 10 dpc hindbrain were assessed respectively by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay (Roche) and anti-phospho-histone H3 (1:200; Upstate Biotechnology) as previously described [46]. Quantitative analyses of TUNEL and phospho-histone H3 were undertaken by counting the percentage of TUNEL positive or phospho-histone H3 positive cells in the area where Atoh1is expressed in normal embryos. For Bmpr double knockouts, where Atoh1 is not expressed, the area equivalent to the Atoh1-positive cells of a corresponding normal littermate was analyzed. At least 8 normal and mutant littermates were examined.
Results
BMP signaling is abrogated in the caudal rhombic lip region in Bmpr mutant animals
Conditional knockouts were induced using a transgenic pedigree, Bcre-32, that contains the neural enhancer/promoter from the Brn4/Pou3f4 gene driving the expression of Cre recombinase [38, 40, 46]. This transgenic strain contains 6 kb of the Brn4/Pou3f4 promoter region driving the expression of the cre recombinase gene is expressed initially in the neural plate beginning at 8.5 dpc and continues to be expressed in the neural tube throughout embryogenesis. Conditional knockout of the Bmpr1a gene alone using the Bcre-32 transgene results in a viable mutant with a limb phenotype [38] and hydrocephalus (S1 Fig); we have not observed any neuroanatomical differences in the hindbrain of this single mutant. The knockout mutation of the Bmpr1b is also viable with limb and fertility defects [41], also suggesting that there are no gross neuroanatomical malformations in these mutants either.
To determine the spatial and temporal expression of the Bcre-32 gene in the precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei, we intercrossed the Bcre-32 pedigree with the ROSA reporter strain, which activates the expression of the lacZ gene upon Cre-mediated recombination [42]. At 10.5 dpc, Bcre-32-mediated expression of lacZ is detected throughout most of the neural tube including the caudal rhombic lip (Fig 1A and 1D). Coronal sections of 10.5 dpc embryos demonstrate that Cre-mediated expression of lacZ is in the caudal rhombic lip of the hindbrain (Fig 1D, arrow) in regions that encompass the expression domain of Atoh1 (compare arrows in Fig 1D and 1E). Postnatally, the hindbrain, including the pontine gray nuclei and inferior olivary nucleus, express the lacZ reporter (Fig 1B and 1C, arrow). Previously, we have demonstrated by Southern blot analysis that the Bcre-32 transgene induces Cre-mediated deletion of the Bmpr1a gene in >95% of the cells in the hindbrain and spinal cord [38]. These data demonstrate that the Bcre-32 transgene efficiently induces gene inactivation of Bmpr1a in the region of the neural tube that will give rise to the hindbrain.
To directly assess the loss of BMP signaling, the expression of phosphorylated Smad (phospho-Smad) was examined. At 11.5 dpc, phospho-Smad immunopositive cells were detected in the caudal rhombic lip in normal embryos (Fig 1F). However, no labeled cells were detected in the caudal rhombic lip of Bmpr1a;Bmpr1b knockout mutants (Bmpr double knockout mice) at the same stage (Fig 1G). An additional confirmation of the loss of BMP signaling is demonstrated by the loss of expression of the Msx2 gene (Fig 1H and 1I), whose expression is directly downstream of BMP signaling. These data demonstrate that loss of both type I receptors abrogates BMP signaling in the caudal rhombic lip.
The expression of genes involved in the specification of rhombic lip progenitors are not detected in Bmpr double knockout animals
Previous studies have demonstrated the essential role of Atoh1 in the formation of rhombic lip derivatives [6, 17, 19, 25, 47]. BMP signaling has been shown to regulate the expression of Atoh1 in the spinal cord [40, 48, 49]. In Bmpr double knockout animals, Atoh1 expression was lost in the caudal rhombic lip at 10.5 dpc (Fig 2A and 2B).
The transcription factor Ngn2 is important for the maintenance of neuronal precursors and specification of cell fates at a level more ventral than the Atoh1 expression domain [50]. To determine whether more ventral precursors were affected in the Bmpr double mutants, we examined the expression of Ngn2. In comparison with normal animals, the expression domain of Ngn2 at 10.5 dpc in the Bmpr double knockout animals was shifted dorsally (Fig 2C and 2D).
To further examine the changes that have occurred in dorsal interneuron cell types in the hindbrain, we have undertaken double-label immunofluorescent analyses using antibodies directed against Pax2 and Lhx1/5. This approach gives a distinctive pattern of labeling that can distinguish changes in interneurons in the region of rhombomere 6 of the hindbrain [44]. In the normal hindbrain, Pax2/Lhx1/5 double label the ventral-most dorsal interneurons (referred to as B class interneurons in ref. 70), whereas Lhx1/5 alone labels dorsal-most interneuron classes (referred to as dA2 and dA4 in Fig 2E). In the mutant, the upper dorsal population is missing (green arrow in Fig 2F).
To determine if the dorsal shift of Ngn2 was due to the Atoh1 expressing cells either undergoing apoptosis or ceasing proliferation due to the loss of BMP signaling, we performed TUNEL assays and phospho-histone H3 immunohistochemistry in the dorsal area of the caudal hindbrain where Atoh1 is expressed. There were few TUNEL-positive cells in the dorsal Atoh1 expressing area of the caudal rhombic lip in both the mutant and normal at 10 dpc, and no significant difference in normal and mutant animals (Table 1). There was also no difference in cell proliferation in the Atoh1 expressing domain between normal and mutants as demonstrated through phospho-histone H3 immunohistochemistry (Table 1). These results demonstrate that changes in the specification of the caudal rhombic lip can be detected as early as 10.5 dpc, resulting in a reduction of the pontine and other precerebellar nuclei that generate mossy fiber innervation of the cerebellum in double knockout animals.
To further characterize the fate of the rhombic lip precursors, we have examined the expression of a marker gene, Barhl1, that is initially expressed in Atoh1-expressing rhombic lip precursors and maintains its expression in the postmitotic neuroblasts derived from these precursors [51]. At 10.5 dpc, Barhl1 is expressed in rhombic lip precursors (Fig 3A) and drastically reduced in Bmpr double knockout mutants (Fig 3B). By 16.5 dpc, most of the migratory rhombic lip precursors have populated their mature position in the hindbrain at the external cuneate, lateral reticular, reticulotegmental and pontine gray nuclei (Fig 3C, 3E and 3G). Expression of Barhl1 is drastically reduced in the hindbrain of Bmpr double knockout mutants (Fig 3D, 3F and 3H).
These data are demonstrate that precerebellar precursors that give rise to mossy fiber afferents are greatly reduced in the Bmpr double knockout mutants.
Abnormal development of precerebellar nuclei that generate mossy fibers in Bmpr double knockout animals
BMP signaling has been shown to be critical for patterning and development of the embryonic neural tube [25, 29, 47]. Because of the importance of BMP signaling in nervous system development, we examined the formation of the hindbrain in Bmpr double knockout mice. Histological staining demonstrated severe reductions in the size of the pontine gray nuclei in Bmpr double knockout neonates at P0 (Fig 4A and 4B, arrows). When Nissl staining was used to examine cellular detail, the dramatic reduction of neurons of the pontine gray nuclei was evident in the Bmpr double knockout animals as compared to normal controls at P0 (Fig 4C and 4D). Other hindbrain nuclei that contribute to mossy fiber innervation of the cerebellum are also drastically reduced or missing in the mutants, including the reticulotegmental, external cuneate and lateral reticular nuclei (Fig 3). A further examination of hindbrain structures revealed a grossly normal inferior olivary nucleus, as shown by Nissl staining, in normal and mutant mice at P0 (Fig 4E and 4F).
Zic genes, which encode zinc finger proteins, function in embryonic pattern formation, in the early stages of central nervous system neurogenesis, and in cerebellar maturation [52,53]. Zic1 and Zic2 are both strongly expressed in differentiated cells of the hindbrain [53]. Therefore, we examined the expression of Zic genes in normal and mutant mice. Our data show that Zic-positive cells are found in the pontine nuclei (S2A Fig). In double mutant animals, reduction of Zic-positive cells was observed at P0 (S2B Fig).
Another transcription factor, Pax6, is expressed in the pontine gray nuclei (for review, Wingate, 2001). Pax6 expression was detected in cells of the pontine gray nuclei in normal animals by in situ hybridization (S2C Fig). The number of Pax6-labeled cells was greatly decreased in the double knockout animals at P0 (S2D Fig).
These results demonstrate that precerebellar nuclei that generate mossy fiber input to the cerebellum are drastically reduced in the Bmpr double knockout animals.
Characterization of inferior olivary nucleus development in Bmpr double knockout mutants
To examine whether the precerebellar nuclei that give rise to climbing fiber afferents develop properly, we have examined molecular markers of inferior olivary nucleus development [22, 23]. The ION is formed from a region of the embryonic hindbrain that expresses Ptf1a [23], which is initially expressed in a dorsolateral domain that lies below the domain expressing Atoh1 in normal embryos (Fig 5A). In 11.5 dpc Bmpr double knockout mutants, the Ptf1a expression domain is shifted dorsally, and abuts the roof plate (Fig 5B). However, at 14.5 dpc, another marker of ION development, Rph3a [54], is grossly unaltered (Fig 5C and 5D). Furthermore, at 16.5 dpc, the expression domain of Rph3a appears unaltered in both coronal (Fig 5E and 5F) and parasagittal sections (Fig 5G and 5H). Therefore, these data demonstrate that, although the embryonic domain that gives rise to the ION is initially shifted dorsally in the Bmpr double knockout mutants, this change is transient and does not result in any permanent alteration in the development of the ION.
The expression of Wnt1 gene is decreased in Bmpr double knockout animals
The Wnt gene family encodes a group of cysteine-rich secreted glycoproteins involved in a wide range of activities during embryogenesis [55–57]. Members of the Wnt family are expressed in the dorsal neural epithelium and roof plate [58, 59]. Therefore, we examined the effects of BMP signaling abrogation on Wnt1 gene expression. The roof plate and adjacent dorsal neuroepithelium showed Wnt1 expression in normal animals at 11.5 dpc (Fig 6A). The domain of Wnt1 expression was reduced in Bmpr double knockout animals (Fig 6B). Thus, our results indicate that BMP signaling is necessary for appropriate expression of Wnt1 gene in the hindbrain.
The remaining Wnt1 expression in Bmpr double knockout animals seems to be expressed in the roof plate (Fig 6B). Therefore, we examined the expression of Gdf7, which is expressed in the lateral roof plate (Fig 6C), and Lmx1a, which is expressed in both the lateral and medial roof plate (Fig 6E, [60]). Gdf7 is present in the Bmpr mutant (Fig 6D) and seems to mirror Wnt1 expression in the mutant (compare Fig 6B to Fig 6D). However, Lmx1a is drastically reduced in the mutant (Fig 6F). Also, non-Gdf7 expressing medial roof plate is reduced in the Bmpr double knockout (arrowhead in Fig 6C and 6D).
Discussion
BMP signaling through BMP type I receptors regulates the development of the hindbrain
BMPs are multifunctional proteins that specify the fate of different cell types [34]. Several lines of evidence indicate that individual or combinatorial actions of BMPs specify distinct dorsal neural fates [25, 29, 47]. BMP signaling through BMP type I receptors is required for the specification of the dorsal commissural neurons in the spinal cord [40]. Several classes of hindbrain cell types, including the granule cells of the cerebellum and precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei, originate from the rhombic lip [8–11]. The neurons of the pontine gray nuclei appear to be drawn from a large extent of the hindbrain rhombic lip [1, 61, 62]. Studies have shown that the transcription factor Atoh1 is required for the production of differentiated neurons generated from the rhombic lip [19]. Our results demonstrate that loss of BMP signaling abrogates the formation of Atoh1-positive cells in the caudal rhombic lip.
BMPs exert their effects through distinct combinations of types I and II serine/threonine kinase receptors that phosphorylate and thereby activate their nuclear effectors, termed Smads [34, 63]. Thus, we used an immunohistological assay that specifically detects the phosphorylated form of Smad1/5/8 to evaluate BMP signaling. Our data indicated that phospho-Smads were not detected in dorsal neural precursors of Bmpr double knockout animals at 11.5 dpc (Fig 1F and 1G; [40]), thus demonstrating that Smad-mediated BMP signaling has been lost. Subsequently, only a vanishingly small number of Atoh1-positive cells are detected in the hindbrain of Bmpr knockout mutants. In its place, we observe a dorsal shift in the domain of more ventral early markers, such as Ngn2 (Fig 2D) and Ptf1a (Fig 5B).
Our hindbrain analyses were facilitated by following the expression of the Barhl1 gene, which is initially expressed in the rhombic lip and continues to be expressed in neuroblasts born from rhombic lip precursors (as shown in Fig 3). We detected a drastic down-regulation of Barhl1 in the Bmpr mutant, indicating that Barhl1 precursors are not specified appropriately. We did not observe ectopic expression of Barhl1, arguing against the hypothesis that the cells are specified, but do not migrate properly. Furthermore, developmental delay is unlikely, because we did not observe any Barhl1 cells in the migratory streams that lead to the pre-cerebellar mutants (Fig 3). Finally, it is unlikely that the cells are specified and then undergo apoptosis, because we do not detect an increase in TUNEL-positive cells in the mutant (Table 1). Nor is it likely that the decreased Barhl1 was due to lack of proliferation because there was no difference in the percentage of phospho-histone H3 positive cells between normal and Bmpr mutant littermates (Table 1).
In a previous analysis of dorsal-ventral patterning in the caudal neural tube at the level of the spinal cord, we have demonstrated an increase in the number of dorsal-ventral interneuron precursors (DI3 and DI4; [40]). In Fig 2, we observed a dorsal expansion of equivalent interneuron subtypes (Lhx1/5 & Pax2 positive cells) consistent with the hypothesis that similar changes are occurring in the hindbrain.
Ptf1a is expressed in a domain that lies ventral to the expression domain of Atoh1-postive precursors that give rise to precerebellar mossy fiber nuclei, and is responsible for specifying climbing fibers derived from the ION [23]. In the Bmpr double knockout mutants, the Ptf1a domain is shifted dorsally to abut the roof plate. Despite this shift in the Ptf1a domain, we have not observed major changes in the size or morphology of the ION (Figs 4 and 5). Given the absence of apoptotic cells in the dorsal neural tube, the absence of change in cell proliferation and the dorsal shift in the expression of Ptf1a, our working hypothesis is that in the absence of BMP signaling, the most dorsal alar plate neural precursors are specified to become more ventral Ptf1a-positive neural precursors. Ptf1a and Atoh1 mutually negatively regulate their expression [64]. We hypothesize that without Atoh1 expression to negatively regulate Ptf1a, cells that would normally express Atoh1 express Ptf1a instead, causing a dorsal shift of Pft1a in Bmpr double knockout mutants.
Role of BMP signaling in regulating Wnt expression in the hindbrain
BMPs and several members of the Wnt gene family, including Wnt1, are expressed in the roof and/or dorsal alar plate [47], where they regulate cell development [49, 65–67]. Wnt proteins regulate cell fate decisions, cell polarity, and embryonic patterning [25, 68, 69]. More specifically, previous evidence indicates that Wnt signaling plays a critical role in the specification of cell types for dorsal interneuron in the spinal cord and that Wnt proteins are direct regulators in the determination of dI1-dI3 interneurons [70]. Absence of Wnt1 leads to diminished development of dI1-dI3 neurons and a compensatory increase in Lim1/Pax2 double positive (presumably dI4 or dI6) neuron populations [71]. Thus, the dorsal neural tube coordinates growth and pattern formation by the production of two classes of signaling pathways, BMPs and Wnts.
Similar to its role in the spinal cord, Wnt1 plays a crucial role in the specification of the most dorsal cell types, which give rise to precerebellar progenitor cells of the caudal rhombic lip. Wnt1 is expressed along the rhombic lip in a dorsal-ventral gradient. The precerebellar progenitor neurons originate within the Wnt1 expressing caudal rhombic lip and are spatially and molecularly well-defined. The mossy fiber precerebellar neurons which contribute to the PN, RtTg, ECu, and LRt originate from the dorsal domain of the caudal rhombic lip specified by high expression of Wnt1 and the expression of Atoh1 (Fig 1E and arrowhead in Fig 6A; [15]). Climbing fiber neurons which contribute to the ION are derived from a more ventral domain of the caudal rhombic lip which expresses a low level of Wnt1 and also expresses Ptf1a (Fig 5A and arrow in Fig 6A; [2]).
Our results demonstrate that the domain of Wnt1 expression in the caudal rhombic lip is reduced in Bmpr double mutant animals (Fig 6A and 6B). Even though Wnt1 expression domain overlaps Atoh1 positive domain, we hypothesize the loss of Wnt1 expression is not due to a secondary effect from the absence of Atoh1 expression. Wnt1 expression is lost in both Atoh1 and Ptf1a positive cells and not just Atoh1 positive cells (Fig 6A and 6B) even though only Atoh1 expression is lost in Bmpr double knockout mutants whereas Ptf1a expression is not lost (Fig 5A and 5B). In Wnt1 knockout mutants, Atoh1 is decreased [66]. Furthermore, it has been shown that ß-catenin, a downstream component of Wnt signaling, binds to Atoh1 enhancer and promotes Atoh1 expression [72]. Also, BMP signaling was shown to up-regulate Wnt1 expression in the chicken dorsal neural tube [70, 73]. Zechner and colleagues further demonstrated that in chick neural tube assays BMP signaling could regulate the expression of Wnt gene family members, but that Wnt expression did not have the reciprocal ability to regulate BMP expression. Results presented here demonstrate that BMP signaling is epistatic to the expression of Wnt1 gene from the roof and dorsal alar plate of the hindbrain and is necessary for the development of mossy fiber precerebellar progenitors.
Interestingly, the non-Gdf7 positive roofplate is reduced in the Bmpr double knockout mutant (arrowhead in Fig 6C and 6D), similar to the reduction of non-Gdf7 positive roofplate observed in the Lmx1a mutant [74]. We hypothesize that this reduction is caused by a drastic reduction in Lmx1a expression in the Bmpr mutant caudal rhombic lip (Fig 6E and 6F). The reduced Lmx1a expression may not contribute significantly to the lack of specification of mossy fiber progenitors seen in the Bmpr mutant, because Atoh1, Gdf7, and Wnt1 are present in the caudal rhombic lip of Lmx1a mutants (Fig 6 of [74]). Only by ablating the Gdf7 positive roofplate does one completely lose Atoh1, Gdf7, and Wnt1 expression in the caudal rhombic lip (Fig 7 of [74]) and the Gdf7 positive roofplate is present in the Bmpr double knockout (Fig 6D).
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that BMP signaling is involved in the generation of the pontine gray nuclei and other precerebellar nuclei that generate mossy fiber input to the cerebellum. Furthermore, BMP signaling, through Wnt1 expression, specifies the Atoh1 positive mossy fiber progenitor cells. These analyses with double knockouts of the Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b genes demonstrate the importance of BMP signaling for appropriate expression of Wnt1 and the development of the precerebellar system in the hindbrain.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [a]
Gross neuroanatomy of the single mutants are unaffected beyond distortions introduced by hydrocephalus.
S2 Fig [a]
Labeling of molecular markers for pontine nuclei at P0.
Zdroje
1. Wingate R.J., Hatten M.E., 1999. The role of the rhombic lip in avian cerebellum development. Development 126, 4395–4404. 10498676
2. Wullimann M.F., Mueller T., Distel M., Babaryka A., Grothe B., Koster R.W. (2011). The long adventurous journey of rhombic lip cells in jawed vertebrates: a comparative developmental analysis. Front. Neuroanat. 5, 27. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2011.00027 21559349
3. Kratochwil CF, Maheshwari U and Rijli FM (2017). The Long Journey of Pontine Nuclei Neurons: From Rhombic lip to Cortico-Ponto-Cerebellar Circuitry. Front. Neural Circuits 11, 33.
4. Alder J., Lee K.J., Jessell T.M., Hatten M.E., 1999. Generation of cerebellar granule neurons in vivo by transplantation of BMP-treated neural progenitor cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 535–540. doi: 10.1038/9189 10448218
5. Hallonet M.E., Teillet M.A., Le Douarin N.M., 1990. A new approach to the development of the cerebellum provided by the quail-chick marker system. Development 108, 19–31. 2351063
6. Machold R., Fishell G., 2005. Math1 is expressed in temporally discrete pools of cerebellar rhombic-lip neural progenitors.[see comment]. Neuron 48, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.028 16202705
7. Zhang L., Goldman J.E., 1996. Developmental fates and migratory pathways of dividing progenitors in the postnatal rat cerebellum. Journal of Comparative Neurology 370, 536–550. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960708)370:4<536::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-5 8807453
8. Altman J., and Bayer S. A. (1987a). Development of the precerebellar nuclei in the rat: I. The precerebellar neuroepithelium of the rhombencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 257, 477–489. doi: 10.1002/cne.902570402 3693594
9. Altman J., and Bayer S. A. (1987b). Development of the precerebellar nuclei in the rat: II. The intramural olivary migratory stream and the neurogenetic organization of the inferior olive. J. Comp. Neurol. 257, 490–512. doi: 10.1002/cne.902570403 3693595
10. Altman J., and Bayer S. A. (1987c). Development of the precerebellar nuclei in the rat: III. The posterior precerebellar extramural migratory stream and the lateral reticular and external cuneate nuclei. J. Comp. Neurol. 257, 513–528. doi: 10.1002/cne.902570404 3693596
11. Altman J., and Bayer S. A. (1987d). Development of the precerebellar nuclei in the rat: IV. The anterior precerebellar extramural migratory stream and the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis and the basal pontine gray. J. Comp. Neurol. 257, 529–552. doi: 10.1002/cne.902570405 3693597
12. Essik C.R., 1912. The development of the nuclei pontis and nucleus arcuatus in man. Am. J. Anat. 13.
13. His, W., 1891. Die Entwicklung des menschlichen Rautenhirns vom Ende des ersten bis zum Beginn des dritten Monats. I. Verlängertes Mark. Abhandlung der königlicher sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematische-physikalische Klasse 20.
14. Rodriguez C. I., and Dymecki S. M. (2000). Origin of the precerebellar system. Neuron 27, 475–486. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00059-3 11055431
15. Landsberg R.L., Awatramani R.B., Hunter N.L., Farago A.F., DiPietrantonio H.J., Rodriguez C.I., Dymecki S.M., 2005. Hindbrain rhombic lip is comprised of discrete progenitor cell populations allocated by Pax6. Neuron 48, 933–947. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.031 16364898
16. Ben-Arie N., Bellen H.J., Armstrong D.L., McCall A.E., Gordadze P.R., Guo Q., et al., 1997. Math1 is essential for genesis of cerebellar granule neurons. Nature 390, 169–172. doi: 10.1038/36579 9367153
17. Wang V.Y., Rose M.F., Zoghbi H.Y., 2005. Math1 expression redefines the rhombic lip derivatives and reveals novel lineages within the brainstem and cerebellum. Neuron 48, 31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.024 16202707
18. Hoshino M., Seto Y., Yamada M. (2013) Specification of Cerebellar and Precerebellar Neurons. In: Manto M., Schmahmann J.D., Rossi F., Gruol D.L., Koibuchi N. (eds) Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders. Springer, Dordrecht
19. Ben-Arie N., Hassan B.A., Bermingham N.A., Malicki D.M., Armstrong D., Matzuk M., et al., 2000. Functional conservation of atonal and Math1 in the CNS and PNS. Development 127, 1039–1048. 10662643
20. Fujiyama T., Yamada M., Terao M., Terashima T., Hioki H., Inoue Y.U., et al., 2009. Inhibitory and excitatory subtypes of cochlear nucleus neurons are defined by distinct bHLH transcription factors, Ptf1a and Atoh1. Development 136, 2049–2058. doi: 10.1242/dev.033480 19439493
21. Hoshino M., Nakamura S., Mori K., Kawauchi T., Terao M., Nishimura Y.V., et al., 2005. Ptf1a, a bHLH transcriptional gene, defines GABAergic neuronal fates in cerebellum. Neuron 47, 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.007 16039563
22. Storm R., Cholewa-Waclaw J., Reuter K., Brohl D., Sieber M., Treier M., et al. 2009. The bHLH transcription factor Olig3 marks the dorsal neuroepithelium of the hindbrain and is essential for the development of brainstem nuclei. Development 136, 295–305. doi: 10.1242/dev.027193 19088088
23. Yamada M., Terao M., Terashima T., Fujiyama T., Kawaguchi Y., Nabeshima Y., et al. 2007. Origin of climbing fiber neurons and their developmental dependence on Ptf1a. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 10924–10934. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1423-07.2007 17928434
24. Dun XP (2012) Origin of climbing fiber neurons and the definition of rhombic lip. Int J Dev Neurosci 30, 391–395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2012.02.002 22406199
25. Liu A., Niswander L.A., 2005. Bone morphogenetic protein signalling and vertebrate nervous system development. [Review] [117 refs]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 945–954. doi: 10.1038/nrn1805 16340955
26. Tong KK, Ma TC, Kwan KM. BMP/Smad signaling and embryonic cerebellum development: stem cell specification and heterogeneity of anterior rhombic lip. Dev Growth Differ 2015;57:121–34. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12198 25705796
27. Hogan B.L., 1996. Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes & Development 10, 1580–1594.
28. Pogue R., Lyons K., 2006. BMP signaling in the cartilage growth plate. [Review] [232 refs]. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 76, 1–48. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)76001-X 17118262
29. Hegarty S.V., O'Keeffe G.W., Sullivan A.M., 2013. BMP-Smad 1/5/8 signalling in the development of the nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 109, 28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.07.002 23891815
30. Le Dreau G., Marti E., 2013. The multiple activities of BMPs during spinal cord development. Cell Mol Life Sci 70, 4293–4305. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1354-9 23673983
31. Massague J., 1996. TGFbeta signaling: receptors, transducers, and Mad proteins. Cell 85, 947–950. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81296-9 8674122
32. Miyazono K., Maeda S., Imamura T., 2005. BMP receptor signaling: transcriptional targets, regulation of signals, and signaling cross-talk. [Review] [130 refs]. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 16, 251–263.
33. ten Dijke P., Miyazono K., Helden C.-H., 1996. Signaling via heterooligomeric complexes of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 8, 139–145. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80058-5 8791413
34. Zeng S., Chen J., Shen H., 2010. Controlling of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Cellular Signalling 22, 888–893. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.12.007 20060893
35. Zhao G.Q., 2003. Consequences of knocking out BMP signaling in the mouse. Genesis 35, 43–56. doi: 10.1002/gene.10167 12481298
36. Dewulf N, Verschueren K, Lonnoy O, Morén A, Grimsby S, Vande Spiegle K, et al. 1995 Distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns of two type I receptors for bone morphogenetic proteins during mouse embryogenesis. Endocrinology 136, 2652–2663. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.6.7750489 7750489
37. Panchision DM1, Pickel JM, Studer L, Lee SH, Turner PA, Hazel TG, et al. (2001) Sequential actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell productionand fate. Genes Dev. 15(16), 2094–110. doi: 10.1101/gad.894701 11511541
38. Ahn K., Mishina Y., Hanks M.C., Behringer R.R., Crenshaw E.B. 3rd, 2001. BMPR-IA signaling is required for the formation of the apical ectodermal ridge and dorsal-ventral patterning of the limb. Development 128, 4449–4461. 11714671
39. Mishina Y., Hanks M.C., Miura S., Tallquist M.D., Behringer R.R., 2002. Generation of Bmpr/Alk3 conditional knockout mice. Genesis: the Journal of Genetics & Development. 32, 69–72.
40. Wine-Lee L., Ahn K.J., Richardson R.D., Mishina Y., Lyons K.M., Crenshaw E.B. III, 2004. Signaling through BMP type 1 receptors is required for development of interneuron cell types in the dorsal spinal cord. Development 131, 5393–5403. doi: 10.1242/dev.01379 15469980
41. Yi S.E., Daluiski A., Pederson R., Rosen V., Lyons K.M., 2000. The type I BMP receptor BMPRIB is required for chondrogenesis in the mouse limb. Development 127, 621–630. 10631182
42. Soriano P., 1999. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nature Genetics 21, 70–71. doi: 10.1038/5007 9916792
43. Wilkinson D.G. (Ed.), 1992. In situ hybridization: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, New York.
44. Sieber MA, Storm R, Martinez-de-la-Torre M, Müller T, Wende H, Reuter K, Vasyutina E, Birchmeier C., 2007. Lbx1 Acts as a Selector Gene in the Fate Determination of Somatosensory and Viscerosensory Relay Neurons in the Hindbrain. J. Neurosci. 27, 4902–4909. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0717-07.2007 17475798
45. Phippard D., Lu L., Lee D., Saunders J.C., Crenshaw E.B. III, 1999. Targeted mutagenesis of the POU-domain gene, Brn4/Pou3f4, causes development defects in the inner ear. J. Neurosci. 19, 5980–5989. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-05980.1999 10407036
46. Qin L., Wine-Lee L., Ahn K.J., Crenshaw E.B. 3rd, 2006. Genetic analyses demonstrate that bone morphogenetic protein signaling is required for embryonic cerebellar development. Journal of Neuroscience 26, 1896–1905. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3202-05.2006 16481421
47. Chizhikov V.V., Millen K.J., 2005. Roof plate-dependent patterning of the vertebrate dorsal central nervous system. [Review] [60 refs]. Developmental Biology 277, 287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.011 15617675
48. Lee K.J., Mendelsohn M., Jessell T.M., 1998. Neuronal patterning by BMPs: a requirement for GDF7 in the generation of a discrete class of commissural interneurons in the mouse spinal cord. Genes & Development 12, 3394–3407.
49. Lee K.J., Dietrich P., Jessell T.M., 2000. Genetic ablation reveals that the roof plate is essential for dorsal interneuron specification [see comments]. Nature 403, 734–740. doi: 10.1038/35001507 10693795
50. Parras C.M., Schuurmans C., Scardigli R., Kim J., Anderson D.J., Guillemot F., 2002. Divergent functions of the proneural genes Mash1 and Ngn2 in the specification of neuronal subtype identity. Genes & Development 16, 324–338.
51. Li S., Qiu F., Xu A., Price S. M., and Xiang M. (2004). Barhl1 regulates migration and survival of cerebellar granule cells by controlling expression of the neurotrophin-3 gene. J. Neurosci. 24, 3104–3114. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4444-03.2004 15044550
52. Aruga J., Minowa O., Yaginuma H., Kuno J., Nagai T., Noda T., et al. 1998. Mouse Zic1 is involved in cerebellar development. J. Neurosci. 18, 284–293. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00284.1998 9412507
53. Aruga J., Inoue T., Hoshino J., Mikoshiba K., 2002. Zic2 controls cerebellar development in cooperation with Zic1. Journal of Neuroscience 22, 218–225. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00218.2002 11756505
54. Foletti DL and Scheller RH (2001) Developmental regulation and specific brain distribution of phosphorabphilin. J Neurosci 21, 5461–5472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05461.2001 11466417
55. Logan C.Y., Nusse R., 2004. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. [Review] [196 refs]. Annual Review of Cell & Developmental Biology 20, 781–810.
56. Montcouquiol M., Crenshaw E.B. III, Kelley M.W., 2006. Non-Canonical Wnt Signaling and Neural Polarity. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 363–386.
57. Nusse R., 2005. Wnt signaling in disease and in development. [Review] [42 refs]. Cell Research 15, 28–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290260 15686623
58. Hollyday M., McMahon J.A., McMahon A.P., 1995. Wnt expression patterns in chick embryo nervous system. Mechanisms of Development 52, 9–25. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00385-e 7577679
59. Parr B.A., Shea M.J., Vassileva G., McMahon A.P., 1993. Mouse Wnt genes exhibit discrete domains of expression in the early embryonic CNS and limb buds. Development 119, 247–261. 8275860
60. Hunter N. L. & Dymecki S. M. (2007) Molecularly and temporally separable lineages form the hindbrain roof plate and contribute differentially to the choroid plexus. Development 134, 3449–3460. doi: 10.1242/dev.003095 17728348
61. Marin F., Puelles L., 1995. Morphological fate of rhombomeres in quail/chick chimeras: a segmental analysis of hindbrain nuclei. European Journal of Neuroscience 7, 1714–1738. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00693.x 7582126
62. Okada T., Keino-Masu K., Masu M., 2007. Migration and nucleogenesis of mouse precerebellar neurons visualized by in utero electroporation of a green fluorescent protein gene. Neuroscience Research 57, 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.09.010 17084476
63. Kawabata M., Inoue H., Hanyu A., Imamura T., Miyazono K., 1998. Smad proteins exist as monomers in vivo and undergo homo- and hetero-oligomerization upon activation by serine/threonine kinase receptors. EMBO Journal 17, 4056–4065. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4056 9670020
64. Yamada M., Seto Y., Taya S., Owa T., Inoue Y. U., Inoue T., et al. (2014). Specification of spatial identities of cerebellar neuron progenitors by Ptf1A and Atoh1 for proper production of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 34, 4786–4800. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2722-13.2014 24695699
65. Dickinson M.E., Krumlauf R., McMahon A.P., 1994. Evidence for a mitogenic effect of Wnt-1 in the developing mammalian central nervous system. Development 120, 1453–1471. 8050356
66. Ikeya M., Lee S.M., Johnson J.E., McMahon A.P., Takada S., 1997. Wnt signalling required for expansion of neural crest and CNS progenitors. Nature 389, 966–970. doi: 10.1038/40146 9353119
67. Megason S.G., McMahon A.P., 2002. A mitogen gradient of dorsal midline Wnts organizes growth in the CNS. Development 129, 2087–2098. 11959819
68. Ciani L., Salinas P.C., 2005. WNTs in the vertebrate nervous system: from patterning to neuronal connectivity. [Review] [137 refs][Erratum appears in Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):582]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 351–362.
69. Garcin C.L, Habib S.J. (2017) A Comparative Perspective on Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling in Cell Fate Determination. In: Tassan JP., Kubiak J. (eds) Asymmetric Cell Division in Development, Differentiation and Cancer. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol 61. Springer, Cham.
70. Zechner D., Müller T., Wende H., Walther I., Taketo M. M., Crenshaw E. B., et al. (2007). Bmp and Wnt/beta-catenin signals control expression of the transcription factor Olig3 and the specification of spinal cord neurons. Dev. Biol. 303, 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.045 17150208
71. Muroyama Y., Fujihara M., Ikeya M., Kondoh H., Takada S., 2002. Wnt signaling plays an essential role in neuronal specification of the dorsal spinal cord. Genes & Development 16, 548–553.
72. Shi F, Cheng YF, Wang XL, Edge AS (2010). Beta-catenin up-regulates Atoh1 expression in neural progenitor cells by interaction with an Atoh1 3′ enhancer. J Biol Chem. 285, 392–400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.059055 19864427
73. Marcelle C., Stark M.R., Bronner-Fraser M., 1997. Coordinate actions of BMPs, Wnts, Shh and noggin mediate patterning of the dorsal somite. Development 124, 3955–3963. 9374393
74. Chizhikov VV, Lindgren AG, Currle D, Rose M, Monuki ES, Millen KJ (2006). The roof plate regulates cerebellar cell-type specification and proliferation. Development 133: 2793–804. doi: 10.1242/dev.02441 16790481
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Je libo čepici místo mozkového implantátu?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Pomůže v budoucnu s triáží na pohotovostech umělá inteligence?
- AI může chirurgům poskytnout cenná data i zpětnou vazbu v reálném čase
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts