#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Dynamics of photosynthetic responses in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian Amazon: Implications for breeding strategies


Authors: Armando Sterling aff001;  Natalia Rodríguez aff001;  Esther Quiceno aff001;  Faiver Trujillo aff001;  Andrés Clavijo aff001;  Juan Carlos Suárez-Salazar aff002
Authors place of work: Laboratorio de Fitopatología, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas Sinchi–Facultad de Ciencias Básicas—Universidad de la Amazonía, Florencia, Colombia aff001;  Laboratorio de Ecofisiología, Universidad de la Amazonia, Facultad de Ingeniería, Programa de Ingeniería Agroecológica, Florencia-Caquetá, Colombia aff002
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226254

Summary

The rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg] is the main source of natural rubber in the world. However, in the Amazon region, its production is reduced by biotic and abiotic limitations, which have prompted breeding programs in order to identify desirable agronomic and physiological indicators. The objective of this study was to analyze the temporal dynamics of photosynthetic responses based on the parameters of leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in 10 rubber tree clones during the immature phase (pre-tapping) in three large-scale clone trials, during daily cycles and under two climatic periods (dry and rainy) in the Caquetá region (Colombian Amazon). The variables A, LT, ΦPSII, ETR and qP were significantly higher in the dry period, where the highest values of PAR, AT and VPD were seen. In San Vicente del Caguán and Florencia, the highest averages were estimated for A, E and gs, as compared with Belén de los Andaquíes. In Florencia, the highest fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a were recorded. At 9:00 h and 12:00 h, the highest means of A, E, ΦPSII and ETR were observed. The majority of the clones displayed the highest Fv/Fm mean (0.82–0.84) in the dry period. The clones FX 4098, FDR 4575, MDF 180, GU198 and FDR 5788 represent genotypes with the best photosynthetic performance (greater photosynthetic rates and better ability of the photosynthetic apparatus to capture, use and dissipate light energy). These desirable genotypes constitute a promising gene pool for expanding the genetic resource of rubber trees in the Colombian Amazon.

Keywords:

Leaves – Stomata – Photosynthesis – Light – Rubber – Chlorophyll – Photochemistry

Introduction

The rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg] is a South American (Amazon region) native species and is the most important natural rubber source globally [1]. Worldwide, the Asia-pacific region produces 91.2% of natural rubber, Africa produces 6.8% and Central and South America produce 2.0% [2].

Breeding programs for this species have used domestication as the main strategy in order to generate genotypes with high productive performance and tolerance to the principal biotic and abiotic limitations of crops [3]. In this sense, various efforts have been made to select more productive varieties that adapt to different agro-climatic conditions, based on the evaluation of agronomic parameters related to yield, biomass production, water use efficiency and diseases resistance [410].

In Colombia, in 2008, SINCHI (Amazonian Institute of Scientific Research), the University of the Amazon and the Association of Rubber Reforesters and Cultivators of Caquetá (ASOHECA) began expanding the genetic resources of H. brasiliensis in Caquetá (Amazon region) by evaluating American-origin clones in large-scale clone trials [11], in order test growth, nutritional behavior, reaction to diseases and pests, phenology and, lastly, to assess latex production (tapping) over a period of 5–10 years.

However, an important aspect in rubber breeding programs is the selection of genotypes resistant to environmental variations by monitoring the physiological response of plants under in vivo conditions and evaluating the ability of plants to survive in adverse environmental conditions [1214]. Knowledge on this response will be useful for understanding the adaptive potential of these rubber clones in different environments, minimizing downtime and maximizing productive performance.

In the genetic breeding programs of various crops, a method of rapid and early selection of genotypes with desirable characteristics, such as high yield or tolerance to environmental stress, has been implemented based on the analysis of physiological characteristics [10] as reported in Gmelina arborea Roxb. [15], Coffea spp. [16], Eucalyptus spp. [17], Pinus spp. [18] and Populus spp. [19].

The most commonly used physiological parameters include relationships with photosynthesis because of the immediate response of the photosynthetic apparatus to most biotic and abiotic factors that can cause stress conditions [20]. According to Holá et al. [20], there are three categories of photosynthetic parameters recommended in breeding programs: 1) variables associated with gas exchange, 2) content of photosynthetic pigments (e.g. chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids) and 3) chlorophyll a fluorescence. Brestic et al. [21] mentioned that the gas exchange measurements are supported by continuous measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence that provide quite a precise estimation of photosynthetic performance, and chlorophyll fluorescence represents a unique tool for diagnostics of plant health status, photosynthetic performance as well as effects of plant stress on plants and assessment of plant stress tolerance [22,23].

The photosynthesis is the key process necessary for plant production. Through the process of photosynthesis of C3 plants is the net result of concurrent processes in which light energy is used to produce ATP and NADPH in the light reaction [24] and subsequently, CO2 is fixed (carboxylation) and released (photorespiration, day respiration) [25]. And the gas exchange measurements are essential for the characterization of leaf photosynthetic properties, including stomatal conductance, carboxylation rate, or water use efficiency [25]. Since rubber is a perennial species that requires more than six years of growth before latex can be harvested (unproductive period) and another seven years to assess its potential yield in the productive period [26], it is essential to analyze this type of physiological indicator, which facilitates the identification of the adaptive potential of new genetic materials in the face of various environmental conditions and, thus, optimizes the growth phase in order to reduce the time required to start the productive phase.

Since field conditions expose rubber trees to various environmental variations throughout the day and at different times of the year, in this study hypothesized that these variations have differential effects on the photosynthetic performance of H. brasiliensis genotypes with different adaptive capacities. To test this hypothesis, the objective of this study was to analyze the temporal dynamics of photosynthetic responses based on the parameters of leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in nine promising American clones and the IAN 873 clone (control) during the immature phase (pre-tapping) in large-scale clone trials as a measurement of the clones’ specific adaptation to agro-climatic conditions in the Colombian Amazon.

Materials and methods

Study area

Experimental sites

The experiments were established in July, 2009 on threes farms owned by rubber producers of the Association of Rubber Reforesters and Cultivators of Caquetá (ASOHECA) in the Department of Caquetá (Colombian Amazon), on land with a moderately undulating topography and edaphoclimatic variations. The study area was had compact soils with very low fertility, high acidity and high aluminum contents as a result of being abandoned pastures (> 20 years land use) with an extensive livestock farming traditional in the region. The first experiment was established in Belén de los Andaquíes (1°25'28'' north and 75°52'11'' west, at an elevation of 300 m above sea level). The second experiment was established in Florencia (1°37'03'' north and 75°37'03'' west, at an elevation of 270 m above sea level). The third experiment was established in San Vicente del Caguán (2°2'40.8'' north and 74°55'11.7'' west, at an elevation of 344 m above sea level).

Climate

Caquetá is a humid tropical region that spans two hemispheres, with almost vertical solar radiation during the entire year [27]. Caquetá has a monomodal climatic regime [28,29], subdivided into the “ecological summer” period that corresponds to the months of November to February (dry period) and a “ecological winter” period that corresponds to the months of March to June (rainy period), the other months correspond to an interval close to the average of the precipitation volumes [30].

According to the Caldas-Lang climate classification [27], Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia have a warm-humid climate, while San Vicente del Caguán is a warm-semi-humid climate. Florencia has an average temperature of 25ºC, an average relative humidity of 84%, a solar brightness of 1,465.4 h light and a precipitation of 3,669 mm year-1. Belén de los Andaquíes has an average temperature of 25ºC, an average relative humidity of 85.7%, a solar brightness of 1,462.3 h light and a rainfall of 3,471 mm year-1. San Vicente del Caguán has an average temperature of 25.4ºC, an average relative humidity of 79%, a solar brightness of 1,552.3 h light and a rainfall of 2,503 mm year-1.

The microclimatic factors: photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), relative humidity (RH), air temperature (AT) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were provided by a SINCHI weather station (Amazonian Institute of Scientific Research) in each experimental site. The data on an average day at 6:00, 9:00, 12:00, 15:00 and 18:000 h was calculated in two climatic period (dry and rainy) for PAR, RH, AT and VPD (Fig 1).

Fig. 1. Daily microclimatic variation in study area (Caquetá, Colombia).
Daily microclimatic variation in study area (Caquetá, Colombia).
Data averages at Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán in two climatic period: dry (November 2017 to January 2018) and rainy (May to June 2018). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), relative humidity (RH), atmosphere temperature (AT) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). The values represent the mean, and the bars the standard error (n = 60).

Soils

Caquetá’s soils are poorly drained, very superficial and deep, with a high aluminum saturation and low base saturation; it has a low quantity of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Phosphorus and Sodium [27]. Belén de los Andaquíes has soils with a pH of 4.8, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 1.07%, organic carbon content of 0.62%, median saturation of 27.7%, and a clay texture. Florencia has soils with a pH of 4.85, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 0.92%, organic carbon content of 0.54%, median saturation of 29.58%, and a clay texture. San Vicente del Caguán has soils with a pH of 4.89, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 0.91%, organic carbon content of 0.60%, median saturation of 28.75%, and a clay-sandy loam texture.

Plant material

The 10 rubber clones used in these trials were H. brasiliensis clones from Central and South America (Table 1) and were chosen because of their good phytosanitary, vigor and production characteristics, mostly achieved on an experimental scale (plant breeding) in countries such as Brazil [3133] and Ecuador [34]. Clone IAN 873 was chosen as the control since it is one of the most widely planted in countries such as Colombia [35].

Tab. 1. Plant material description.
Plant material description.
The ten rubber tree clones tested in Florencia, Belén de los Andaquíes and San Vicente del Caguán, Caquetá (Colombia), 2017–2018.

Experimental design and maintenance of the plots

A large-scale clonal trail (LSCT) was established in each site [36]. Each LSCT followed a randomized complete block design with 10 treatments (genotypes) and four replications randomly arranged in Fisher blocks, with 60 trees per replicate and per clone. The planting distance was 7.0 m × 3.0 m, providing a density of 476 trees per hectare, for a total LSCT area of 5.04 ha. The unit plot was 1,260 m2, corresponding to 60 trees organized in 3 rows of 20 trees. The trial was surrounded by one row of Colombian mahogany (Cariniana pyriformis Miers) as a windbreaker barrier.

Each plot employed fertilization management with a frequency every of six months using a compound fertilizer [N (15%), P2O5 (15%), K2O (15%), CaO (2.2%), S-SO4 (1.7%)] with a dosage of 150 g plant-1, a fertilizer with minor elements [N (8%), P2O5 (5%), CaO (18%), MgO (6%), S (1.6%), B (1%), Cu (0.14%), Mo (0.005%) and Zn (2.5%)] (75 g plant-1) and organic matter (1,000 g plant-1). Weeds were removed with mechanical controls with a frequency of every three months. Phytosanitary controls were not carried out.

Photosynthetic and micro-environmental parameters

The photosynthetic and micro-environmental parameters at the leaf level were measured in each site for two climatic periods: a) dry period: December 13–17, 2017 in San Vicente del Caguán; January 12–16, 2018 in Belén de los Andaquíes; January 16–20, 2018 in Florencia. b) rainy period: May 10–14, 2018 in San Vicente del Caguán; May 19–24, 2018 in Belén de los Andaquíes; June 6–10, 2018 in Florencia.

The photosynthetic light response curves (A/PAR), leaf gas exchange, micro-environmental parameters at the leaf level and chlorophyll a fluorescence were measured with a portable photosynthesis system (CIRAS-3 PP Systems, USA) coupled with a chlorophyll fluorescence module (CFM-3 PP Systems, Amsbury, MA, USA). The CO2 flow was maintained at a concentration of 390 μmol mol-1, with a cuvette temperature (CT) of 27°C, an average relative humidity (RH) of 70% and a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) 2.5 kPa on average.

The photosynthetic light responses curves (A/PAR) were done per clone in order to determine the constant value of PAR to be used in all measurements with CIRAS-3 in all clones for all three experimental sites (PAR = 1,067 μmol photons m-2 s-1). The PAR intensity was modulated in decreasing order in 16 steps between 2,500 to 0 μmol photons m-2s-1, between 9:00 to 12:00 h. The parameters derived from the A/PAR curve included the maximum photosynthetic rate at saturating light (Amax), the light compensation point (LCP), the light saturation point (LSP), the dark breathing rate (Rd), and the apparent quantum efficiency (Aqe), which were fit to the Mitscherlich Model [37].

The gas exchange variables were measured at the foliar level: net photosynthesis rate (A) (μmol CO2 m-2 s-1), transpiration rate (E) (mmol H2O m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (gs) (mmol H2O m-2 s-1), concentration of intercellular CO2 (Ci) and leaf temperature (LT) [38], as well as the micro-environmental parameters PAR, RH, VPD y AT. The measurements were taken in a daily cycle between 6:00 h and 18:00 h at 3-hour intervals on sunny days. Two healthy leaves with physiological maturity in foliar stage D (140–150 days old) were selected [39], which were fully expanded and found in the middle-third of the canopy, in four trees per clone. The chlorophyll content index (CCI) was also measured as a leaf selection criterion, defining a range between 18 to 38 units in the central leaflet of each leaf. The CCI was measured with a chlorophyll concentration meter (MC-100, Apogee Instruments Inc., USA).

The chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement was recorded simultaneously with the same leaves used for the gas exchange parameters. A predawn measurement (3:00 h) was taken to ensure that the leaves were adapted to darkness. Following this period of adaptation to darkness, the leaf tissue was exposed to a weak modulated pulse (0.03 μmol m-2 s-1, non-actinic) to obtain the minimum fluorescence (Fo). A pulse of white saturating light (6,000 μmol m-2 s-1) was then emitted for 1 s to obtain the maximum fluorescence (Fm) and, thus, calculate the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) [40]. Subsequently, a pulse of actinic light (9,000 μmol photons m-2 s-1) was used to measure the steady state fluorescence yield (Fs) and the maximum light adapted fluorescence (Fm'). Once the actinic light was removed, the leaf was exposed to a pulse of far red light in order to oxidize the quinone QA to the maximum and estimate the minimum fluorescence in light-adapted leaves (Fo'), guaranteeing that the PSII reaction centers opened again. The parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence estimated in dark-adapted leaves were:

The efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (Fv'/Fm'), can be used to provide an estimate of the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the light-adapted state [23], and was calculated as:

The parameter qP gives an indication of the proportion of PSII reaction centers that are already open [41]. This was calculated as:

To evaluate the changes in the apparent rate constant for excitation decay by heat loss induced by light relative to this constant rate in the dark, the parameter NPQ was assessed [40]. This parameter was calculated as:

The parameters of chlorophyll a fluorescence estimated in light-adapted leaves in the daily cycle (6:00 to 18:00 h) were:

The photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) measures the proportion of the light that is absorbed by chlorophyll associated with PSII and is used in photochemistry [42]; it was calculated as:

The apparent electron transport rate (ETR), which is an indicator of overall photosynthetic capacity in vivo, was determined as follows [41]:

where PAR is absorbed light, and 0.50 is the factor that accounts for the partitioning of energy.

Data analysis

A mixed general linear model (MGLM) was adjusted to analyze the effect of the fixed factors (sources of variation): climatic period, site, clone, hour and their interactions on the physiological variables. The assumptions of the GLM (normality and homogeneity of variance) were evaluated using an exploratory residual analysis. The nested blocks in the sites and the plots associated with the genotypes within the blocks were included as random effects. The residual variance was modeled to contemplate different variances (Heteroscedasticity), while the residual correlation for the successive observations (hour) carried out on the same plant was contemplated with the models generally used for longitudinal data. Akaike (AIC), Bayesian (BIC) and Log lik criteria were used to select the structure of residual variances and correlations [43]. The analyses were carried out using the lme function in the nlme package [44] in R language software, version 3.4.1 [45], and the interface in InfoStat v. 2017 [46]. Differences between mean variables in all fixed factors were analyzed with Fisher’s LSD post-hoc test at a significance of α = 0.05. The coefficients of correlation (Pearson’s test) between the physiological variables were estimated for each of the periods.

To explore the relationships between the physiological variables and the microclimatic parameters associated with 10 rubber tree clones, a Co-Inertia analysis was carried out on the covariance matrix [47]. A Monte Carlo test was carried out to determine the significance of the Co-Inertia values, using ADE-4 [48], included in the R 3.4.1 package [45].

Results

Diurnal changes in the microclimatic factors

According to Fig 1, the PAR (682 μmol photon m-2 s-1), AT (28ºC) and VPD (1.0 kPa) were always highest in the dry period. The highest values of PAR and AT were observed from 9:00 to 12:00 h in San Vicente del Caguán (1,600 μmol photon m-2 s-1 and 32ºC, respectively). In Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia, the highest PAR values were recorded at 12:00 h with 1,434 and 1,274 μmol photon m-2 s-1, respectively. The higher VPD values were observed from 12:00 to 15:00 h (1.6 kPa) in San Vicente del Caguán and Belén de los Andaquíes. The RH acted contrary to the PAR, with the minimum values generally at 12:00 and 15:00 h, below 60%; San Vicente del Caguán recorded the lowest values in this period climatic.

Meanwhile, the rainy period reached the maximum RH, with average of 86%, but had the lowest values of AT (26ºC), PAR (558 μmol photon m-2 s-1) and DPV (0.43 kPa). The maximum RH values were recorded at 6:00 and 18:00 h in Florencia, above 95%, and the lowest value was in Belén de los Andaquíes and San Vicente del Caguán at 12:00 and 15:00 h with 75%.

Photosynthetic light response

Significant differences in the photosynthetic response to light were observed between the 10 clones (Table 2). Clone CDC 56 presented the highest Amax, while clone FDR 5788 had a 21.9% lower CO2 assimilation rate. However, this higher carbon fixation was not always related to greater efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus (Aqe), as occurred in clone GU 198. Clone FDR 5597 had the highest LCP value, double that registered for clone FDR 4575, which had the lowest value. The LSP in most of the clones was above 1,000 μmol photons m-2s-1, where clone FDR 5597 had the highest value, while GU 198 presented the lowest saturation point. As for Rd, clone FDR 4575 presented the lowest value in this process, while clone FX 3899 P1 had 63% higher substrate consumption.

Tab. 2. Parameters derived from the photosynthetic light (A/PAR) response curves of 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian amazon.
Parameters derived from the photosynthetic light (<i>A/PAR</i>) response curves of 10 rubber tree (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) clones in Colombian amazon.
Amax, light-saturated net carbon assimilation rate; LCP, light compensation point; LSP, light saturation point; Rd, dark respiration rate; Aqe, quantum efficiency. Data are shown as mean value ± SE (n = 4).

Foliar micro-environmental parameters

The micro-environmental parameters measured at the foliar level showed that in dry period recorded the highest average values of PAR (258 μmol m-2 s-1), AT (33ºC) and VPD (2.6 kPa). The rainy period recorded the highest average values of RH, with 50%. The maximum values of PAR (560 μmol m-2 s-1), RH (54%) and AT (32ºC) were obtained in San Vicente del Caguán in both climatic periods, while the VPD (2.9 kPa) was higher in Belén de los Andaquíes in the dry period. At the three sites, the maximum PAR (480 μmol m-2 s-1) occurred at midday in the dry period, as compared with the rainy period (430 μmol m-2 s-1). This diurnal pattern for maximum values at midday was also observed for VPD and AT.

Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence a

Significant effects were observed from all of the principal effects on the gas exchange variables (with the exception of LT) and the fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a (Table 3). There were significant differences in the higher order interaction for all the gas exchange variables, with the exception of the ΦPSII and ETR variables. The parameters Fv/Fm, Fv'/Fm' and qP showed significant differences between the periods, between the sites and in the interaction between both factors. qP presented significant differences in the interaction between the factors period, site and clone.

Tab. 3. Analysis of variance of the fixed effects.
Analysis of variance of the fixed effects.
Period (P), site (S) clone (C), hour (H), and their interactions, on the net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (Fv'/Fm'), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ).

Most of the photosynthetic parameters were significantly higher in the rainy period, except for A, LT, ΦPSII, ETR and qP, with higher means in the dry period (Table 4). In San Vicente del Caguán and Florencia, the highest averages were estimated for A, E and gs, as compared with Belén de los Andaquíes (Table 4). In Florencia, the highest fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a were recorded.

Tab. 4. Mean values for the leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a.
Mean values for the leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll <i>a</i>.
Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (Fv'/Fm') and photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ).

Overall, the means of A, E, gs, ΦPSII and ETR were significantly higher in the clones CDC 312, FDR 4575, FDR 5788, FX 4098, GU 198 and the IAN 873 control (Table 4). The clones with lower averages in parameters A, E and gs were FX 3899 P1 and FDR 5597. At 9:00 and 12:00 h, the highest averages of A, E, ΦPSII and ETR were seen (Table 4). The means of gs and Ci were significantly higher at 6:00 h. At 12:00 h the highest average for LT was observed.

As shown in Fig 2, A showed an increase between 9:00 and 12:00 h, followed by a progressive decline towards sunset. This pattern only differed in clones CDC 312, FX 4098 and GU 198 in Belén de los Andaquíes in the rainy season, where the peaks occurred between 12:00 and 15:00 h (Fig 2B). In the rainy period in San Vicente del Caguán, it was observed that clones FX 4098, CDC 312, MDF 180, FDR 5597 and FX 3899 P1 recorded the lowest A average at 9:00 h (Fig 2F).

Fig. 2. Daily net CO2 assimilation rate (A) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).
Daily net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate (<i>A</i>) in 10 rubber tree (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).
(A), (C) and (E), dry period; (B), (D) and (F), rainy period; (A) and (B), Belén de los Andaquíes; (C) and (D), Florencia; (E) and (F), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the dry and rainy periods followed by an inverted triangle and for the clones followed by an asterisk (*) for each time of day were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4.

According to Fig 3, independent of the period, all rubber clones had the highest average Fv/Fm (0.82–0.84) in Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia (Fig 3A and 3B), as compared with San Vicente del Caguán (0.77–0.79) (Fig 3C). When including the effect of the period, it was observed that most of the clones had the highest average of Fv/Fm (0.82–0.84) in the dry period of Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia. However, in the rainy period of San Vicente del Caguán, all clones presented means significantly similar to those observed in the other two sites.

Fig. 3. Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).
Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (<i>F</i><sub><i>v</i></sub><i>/F</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>) in 10 rubber tree (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).
Measurements carried out in leaves adapted to darkness (predawn, 3:00 h). (A), Belén de los Andaquíes; (B), Florencia; (C), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán sites followed by an inverted triangle and for the dry and rainy periods followed by an asterisk (*) for each clone were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4.

Pearson correlation

The Pearson's correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between A and the parameters E and gs in both periods, and between E and gs, while the correlation of Ci with these parameters was negative (except with E in the dry period) (Table 5). LT presented a negative correlation with A, E and gs in both periods and showed a positive correlation with ΦPSII, ETR, Fv/Fm and Fv'/Fm' in the dry period, but a negative correlation in the rainy season with ΦPSII and ETR and a positive correlation in both periods with Ci (Table 5). ΦPSII and ETR had a positive correlation with each other and with the parameters Fv/Fm and Fv'/Fm' in the two periods (Table 5). In the dry period, A and E presented a negative correlation with ΦPSII, ETR, Fv/Fm and Fv'/Fm' (Table 5).

Tab. 5. Pearson's correlation coefficients for leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a measured in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in the Colombian Amazon.
Pearson's correlation coefficients for leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll <i>a</i> measured in 10 rubber tree (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>) clones in the Colombian Amazon.
Dry period (below the diagonal) and rainy period (above the diagonal).

Co-Inertia analysis

The Montecarlo test of the Co-Inertia analysis was very significant (p < 0.01), which means the co-structure described by axes 1 and 2 was similar to the structures described in the individual analysis (principal component analysis) of each group of variables (micro-environmental and photosynthesis). The first two axes of the Co-Inertia analysis explained 98.52% and 0.92% of the total variability, which indicates that the studied variables were sufficient to explain the ordination observed in the evaluated clones (Fig 4).

Fig. 4. Results of the Co-Inertia analysis between the foliar micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis variables in 10 Hevea brasiliensis clones.
Results of the Co-Inertia analysis between the foliar micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis variables in 10 <i>Hevea brasiliensis</i> clones.
(A) a factorial co-Inertia plane for the clones. (B) and (C) the projection of the micro-environmental and photosynthesis vectors, respectively, in the factorial co-Inertia plane. The arrow head represents the position of the clones for the photosynthesis variables, and the other extreme shows the micro-environmental parameters. The bigger the arrow is, the less of a relationship there was between the micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis.

According to Fig 4, the intensity of the relationship between the studied groups of variables was different in the different clones. The strongest relationship was observed in the clones with the highest gas exchange values and the lowest micro-environmental parameters. The clones with better photosynthetic performance (desirable genotypes: FDR 5788, GU 198 and FX 4098) were located to the right of the ordination axis 1, which demonstrated greater photosynthetic rates (A) and a better ability in the photosynthetic apparatus (PSII) to capture and use light energy (Fv/Fm, Fv'/Fm' and qP). The FX 3899 P1 and FDR 5597 clones were mainly grouped towards the left of the ordination axis 1, with the lowest photosynthetic performance and the highest values for the micro-environmental parameters (except the RH). The MDF 180 clone, with the best photosynthetic capacity to dissipate light energy (highest value of NPQ) (Table 4), was located on the positive extreme of axis 2 of the ordination plane.

Discussion

Although the Amazon region has rainfall throughout the year, it also has seasonality in its precipitation and radiation [49]. In the present study, not only were there differences in the microclimatic parameters PAR, AT, VPD and RH between the dry and rainy periods, but there was also a significant variation in the physiological response between both periods for all the studied sites. According to Renninger and Phillips [49] and Zhang et al. [50], in the Amazon, environmental radiation is the most important limiting factor for the rubber plant since, in the rainy season, cloudiness is greater and the amount of light (‘sun flecks’) that can be used for photosynthesis is limited [51]. In the present study, this condition was evidenced by a lower A in the rainy season. However, in the rainy period, the gs and E were higher, which favored stomatal opening as a result of higher RH values and lower values of AT and VPD [52]. Likewise, the positive correlation observed between A and gs and the daytime pattern of these parameters in both periods suggest that both processes lead to a higher photosynthetic performance in the morning hours, where there is greater stomatal openings, favoring higher assimilation rates of CO2 [53]. Light is one of the most important environmental factors that influence both A and gs, and the variation in light energy received by the plant can create rapid and extreme fluctuations in leaf temperature and leaf–air vapour pressure deficit to which stomata will respond in conjunction with other environmental cues [54]. In this study, a decreasing pattern for gs at midday in both seasons was observed. In citrus and many other species, stomata closure has been observed in plants around midday, the time when reached the highest VPD and temperature, which generates a reduction in stomata conductance (gs) and thus a characteristic decrease in CO2 assimilation [51].

Several studies have also reported an increase in photosynthesis in the dry period in the Amazon region because water is not a limiting factor, but light is [5557]. Although the dry evapotranspiration period is greater because of an increase in radiation and temperature [49], a partial closure of the stomata would be expected because of a higher VPD [52,58] as compared with the rainy period, possibly because of the deep root system of rubber trees, combined with the hydraulic redistribution of the roots [59,60].

In the present study, the variations observed in the photosynthetic responses to light in the different rubber clones responded to the intraspecific genetic variability of this species, where these genotypes showed a greater photosynthetic capacity (higher values in Amax, LCP, LSP y Rd) with respect to other clones analyzed in similar studies [8,61].

These variations also showed the diurnal behavior of the clones in the different areas, where they evidenced a diurnal behavior for the net photosynthetic rate (A) in the different periods and sites, with GU 198 and FX 4098 recording higher A values between 9:00 and 12:00 h (higher PAR). These two clones, despite not reporting the highest Amax, showed high efficiency in the quantum conversion (Aqe), low light compensation points (PCL) and a higher Amax with a lower PAR, as compared with the other clones. According to Gunasekera et al. [61], in terms of increasing productivity in H. brasiliensis, a low PCL value is important since it keeps the photosynthetic rate (A) positive even when the light intensity is low and, therefore, continues the accumulation of dry matter under these conditions.

Clones FX 4098, CDC 312, FDR 4575, FDR 5788 and GU 198 recorded the highest average values of A, E, gs, J and ΦPSII in both climatic periods during the diurnal cycle, reflecting a greater physiological capacity of the plants to maintain the photosynthetic apparatus and express better photosynthetic performance against changes and limitations of the underlying environmental conditions [62]. This behavior is useful for the selection of promising genotypes because clones that present a better adaptation in their photosynthetic apparatus to environmental stress factors will express higher growth rates and greater production potential in the field [10,20,26].

In rubber, photosynthetic rates and efficient water use are physiological variables that have been associated with high-performance clones [9]. Ahmad et al. [10] found that parameters such as A, E, gs and stomata characteristics have a positive correlation with latex performance, making they important parameters for the selection of new clones.

The decrease in the Fv/Fm and Fv'/Fm' in the dry period was possibly related to reversible changes in the electron transport flow and heat dissipation used by the photosynthetic apparatus to adjust the quantum efficiency of the PSII and, thus, avoid damage at the level of the photosynthetic system [58], which could explain the negative correlation of these parameters with A in the dry period. However, the values recorded for Fv/Fm did not indicate photoinhibition in any of the sites or periods since the values were above 0.78 [40]. ΦPSII is the proportion of absorbed energy being used in photochemistry, and qP gives an indication of the proportion of PSII reaction centers that are open [22]. In this study, ΦPSII, J and qP were higher in both seasons and three LSCT, indicating the rubber’s clones had a high photochemical capacity and a greater efficiency at transferring light energy from the light-harvesting complex to PSII. Also, NPQ indicates that high levels of light energy that could exceed photosynthetic capability will be transformed into thermal dissipation [63], were lower indicate that dissipation of light energy were used in photochemical processes.

Conclusions

The results of the present study show a significant effect of the phenotypic variation of H. brasiliensis on the photosynthetic behavior of rubber, and this, in turn, is directly influenced by the daily and seasonal micro-environmental variations characteristic of the Colombian Amazon. The best photosynthetic performance was observed in the dry period, between 9:00 and 12:00 h, in Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán.

These results lead to the conclusion that the evaluation of the temporal dynamics of the parameters of gaseous exchange and fluorescence of chlorophyll a in the rubber clones analyzed in the present study identifies the unproductive phase of the rubber crop, the potential physiological adaptation of these genotypes in the face of different agro-climatic conditions in the Colombian Amazon and, therefore, highlights the greater production potential that these materials may express differentially in the final phase of the productive evaluation.

The clones FX 4098, FDR 4575, MDF 180, GU198 and FDR 5788 are the genotypes with the best photosynthetic performance and the best phenotypic plasticity in the different periods and locations that were studied. These desirable genotypes constitute a promising gene pool for expanding the genetic resources of rubber trees in the Colombian Amazon region.

Supporting information

S1 File [txt]
Daily microclimatic variation in study area (Caquetá, Colombia).

S2 File [txt]
Daily net CO assimilation rate () in 10 rubber tree () clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

S3 File [txt]
Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII () in 10 rubber tree () clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

S4 File [txt]
Results of the Co-Inertia analysis between the foliar micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis variables in 10 clones.


Zdroje

1. Venkatachalam P, Geetha N, Sangeetha P, Thulaseedharan A. Natural rubber producing plants: An overview. African J Biotechnol. 2013;12: 1297–1310. doi: 10.5897/AJBX12.016

2. International Rubber Study Group (IRSG). Rubber Statiscal Bulletin. Sri Lanka; 2019.

3. Goncalves P de S, Ortolani AA, Cardoso M. Melhoramento genetico da seringueira: uma revisao [Internet]. Instituto Agronomico, Campinas (Brazil): Instituto Agronomico, Campinas (Brazil); 1997. Available: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2015009815

4. Falqueto AR, da Silva Júnior RA, Gomes MTG, Martins JPR, Silva DM, Partelli FL. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence in two rubber tree clones. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2017;224: 238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.019

5. Ping L, Jun-jun H, Yan-li Y, Xiao-hong D, Ru-xiong C, Li-feng W. Differential responses of two rubber tree clones to chilling stress. African J Biotechnol. 2012;11: 13466–13471. doi: 10.5897/AJB12.1180

6. Miguel AA, Oliveira LEM de, Cairo PAR, Oliveira DM de. Photosynthetic behaviour during the leaf ontogeny of rubber tree clones[Hevea brasiliensis (Wild. ex. Adr. de Juss.) Muell. Arg.]. Ciênc Agrotec Lavras. 2007;31: 91–97. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542007000100014

7. Sterling A, Melgarejo LM. Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Hevea brasiliensis in response to Pseudocercospora ulei infection. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. Elsevier Ltd; 2018;103: 143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.07.006

8. Nataraja KN, Jacob J. Clonal differences in photosynthesis in Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg. Photosynthetica. 1999;36: 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007070820925

9. Nugawela A, Long SP, Aluthhewage RK. Genotypic variation in non-steady state photosynthetic carbon dioxide assimilation of Hevea brasiliensis. J Rubber Res Inst Sri Lanka. 1995;10: 266–275.

10. Ahmad B, Idris H, Sulong SH. Early Selection of Promising High Yielding Hevea Progenies based on Selected Physiological and. J Rubber Res. 2009;12: 140–150.

11. Sterling A, Rodríguez CH. Ampliación de la base genética de caucho natural con proyección para la Amazonia colombiana: fase de evaluación en periodo improductivo a gran escala. Bogotá: Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas- Sinchi; 2012.

12. Bacelar EA, Santos DL, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Gonçalves BC, Ferreira HF, Correia CM. Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: changes on structure and chemical composition of foliage and oxidative damage. Plant Sci. 2006;170: 596–605.

13. Rodrigo VHL. Ecophysiological factors underpinning productivity of Hevea brasiliensis. Brazilian J Plant Physiol. 2007;19: 245–255. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202007000400002

14. Senevirathna AMWK, Stirling CM, Rodrigo VHL. Growth, photosynthetic performance and shade adaptation of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) grown in natural shade. Tree Physiol. 2003;23: 705–712. doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.10.705 12777243

15. Ávila C, Murillo R, Hernández C, Flores G, Murillo O, Arias D. Photosynthetic Behavior of Gmelina Arborea Genotypes in Rooted Mini-Cuttings Stage under Nursery Conditions, at South Pacific of Costa Rica. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2017;7: 32–44.

16. DaMatta F, Chaves A, Pinheiro H, Ducatti C, Loureiro M. Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Sci. 2003;164: 111–117. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00342-4

17. Granda V, Delatorre C, Cuesta C, Centeno ML, Fernández B, Rodríguez A, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses to severe drought stress of nine Eucalyptus globulus clones: A multivariate approach. Tree Physiol. 2014;34: 778–786. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu052 25009154

18. Espinoza SE, Magni CR, Rubilar RA, Yañez MA, Santelices RE, Cabrera AM, et al. Field performance of various Pinus radiata breeding families established on a drought-prone site in central Chile. New Zeal J For Sci. 2017;47: 12. doi: 10.1186/s40490-017-0093-3

19. Zhao X, Li Y, Zheng M, Bian X, Liu M, Sun Y, et al. Comparative analysis of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of (Populus simonii × P. nigra) × (P. nigra × P. simonii) hybrid clones of different ploidides. PLoS One. 2015;10: 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119259 25867100

20. Holá D, Benešová M, Honnerová J, Hnilička F, Rothová O, Kočová M, et al. The evaluation of photosynthetic parameters in maize inbred lines subjected to water deficiency: Can these parameters be used for the prediction of performance of hybrid progeny? Photosynthetica. 2010;48: 545–558. doi: 10.1007/s11099-010-0072-x

21. Brestic M, Zivcak M, Hauptvogel P, Misheva S, Kocheva K, Yang X, et al. Wheat plant selection for high yields entailed improvement of leaf anatomical and biochemical traits including tolerance to non-optimal temperature conditions. Photosynth Res. Springer Netherlands; 2018;136: 245–255. doi: 10.1007/s11120-018-0486-z 29383631

22. Huang D, Wu L, Chen JR, Dong L. Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels. Photosynthetica. 2011;49: 611–618. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0076-1

23. Murchie EH, Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 2013;64: 3983–3998. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert208 23913954

24. Dai Y, Shen Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Hannaway D, Lu H. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;65: 177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008

25. Tcherkez G, Limami AM. Net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation: more than just CO2 and O2 reduction cycles. New Phytol. 2019;223: 520–529. doi: 10.1111/nph.15828 30927445

26. Priyadarshan PM. Biology of Hevea Rubber. 1st ed. Priyadarshan PM, editor. Springer International Publishing; 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54506-6

27. Instituto Geográfico Agustin Codazzi (IGAC). Caquetá, características geográficas. Bogotá, DC: Imprenta nacional de Colombia; 2010.

28. Murad CA, Pearse J. Landsat study of deforestation in the Amazon region of Colombia: Departments of Caquetá and Putumayo. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ. Elsevier; 2018;11: 161–171. doi: 10.1016/J.RSASE.2018.07.003

29. Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM). Promedios precipitación y temperatura media. Promedio de los años 1981–2015. In: Instituto de Hidrología Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. 2015.

30. Corpoamazonia. Clima del Caquetá—Región sur [Internet]. 2013. Available: http://www.corpoamazonia.gov.co/region/Jur_Clima.htm

31. Le Guen V, Garcia D, Mattos CRR, Clément-Demange A. Evaluation of field resistance to Microcyclus ulei of a collection of Amazonian rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) germplasm. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2002;2: 141–148.

32. Garcia D, Mattos CRR, Gonçalves P de S, Le Guen V. Selection of Rubber Clones for Resistance to South American Leaf Blight and Latex Yield in the Germplasm of the Michelin Plantation of Bahia (Brazil). J Rubber Res. 2004;7: 188–198.

33. Cardoso SEA, Freitas TA, Da C. Silva D, Gouvêa LRL, Gonçalves PDS, Mattos CRR, et al. Comparison of growth, yield and related traits of resistant Hevea genotypes under high South American leaf blight pressure. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;53: 337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.033

34. Rivano F, Martinez M, Cevallos V, Cilas C. Assessing resistance of rubber tree clones to Microcyclus ulei in large-scale clone trials in Ecuador: A less time-consuming field method. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2010;126: 541–552. doi: 10.1007/s10658-009-9563-7

35. Confederación Cauchera Colombiana (CCC). Estado actual del gremio cauchero colombiano. Bogotá, Colombia; 2015.

36. Clément-Demange A, Nicolas D, Legnaté H, Rivano F, Le Guen V, Gnagne M, et al. Hévéa: stratégies de sélection. Plant Rech Développement. 1995;2: 5–14.

37. Marino G, Aqil M, Shipley B. The leaf economics spectrum and the prediction of photosynthetic light–response curves. Funct Ecol. 2010;24: 263–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01630.x

38. Cuevas E, Baeza P, Lissarrague JR. Variation in stomatal behaviour and gas exchange between mid-morning and mid-afternoon of north-south oriented grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo) at different levels of soil water availability. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2006;108: 173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.027

39. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB. Tropical trees and forest. Berlin, DE; 1978.

40. Baker NR. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59: 89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 18444897

41. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51: 659–668. doi: 10.1093/jxb/51.345.659 10938857

42. Genty B, Briantais J, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1989;990: 87–92.

43. Di Rienzo JA, Macchiavelli RE, Casanoves F. Modelos lineales mixtos: aplicaciones en InfoStat. Córdoba, Argentina; 2011.

44. Pinheiro J, Bates D, Saikat D. Deepayan Sarkar and the R development core team. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R packageversion. 2013. pp. 1–109.

45. R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2017. Available: http://www.r-project.org/

46. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat versión (2017) [Internet]. Córdoba, Ar.: Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; 2017. Available: http://www.infostat.com.ar

47. Dolédec S, Chessel D. Co‐inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species–environment relationships. Freshw Biol. 1994;31: 277–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01741.x

48. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dolédec S, Olivier J-M. ADE-4 a Multivariate Analysis and Graphical Display Software. Stat Comput. 1997;7. doi: 10.1023/A:1018513530268

49. Renninger HJ, Phillips N. Wet-vs. Dry-Season Transpiration in an Amazonian Rain Forest Palm Iriartea deltoidea. Biotropica. 2010;42: 470–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00612.x

50. Zhang JL, Meng LZ, Cao KF. Sustained diurnal photosynthetic depression in uppermost-canopy leaves of four dipterocarp species in the rainy and dry seasons: Does photorespiration play a role in photoprotection? Tree Physiol. 2009;29: 217–228. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpn018 19203947

51. Lawson T, Vialet-Chabrand S. Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. New Phytol. 2019;221: 93–98. doi: 10.1111/nph.15330 29987878

52. Vongcharoen K, Santanoo S, Banterng P, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Theerakulpisut P. Seasonal variation in photosynthesis performance of cassava at two different growth stages under irrigated and rain-fed conditions in a tropical savanna climate. Photosynthetica. 2018;56: 1398–1413. doi: 10.1007/s11099-018-0849-x

53. Kositsup B, Kasemsap P, Thanisawanyangkura S, Chairungsee N, Satakhun D, Teerawatanasuk K, et al. Effect of leaf age and position on light-saturated CO2 assimilation rate, photosynthetic capacity, and stomatal conductance in rubber trees. Photosynthetica. 2010;48: 67–78. doi: 10.1007/s11099-010-0010-y

54. Ribeiro R V., Machado EC, Santos MG, Oliveira RF. Seasonal and diurnal changes in photosynthetic limitation of young sweet orange trees. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;66: 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.011

55. Guan K, Pan M, Li H, Wolf A, Wu J, Medvigy D, et al. Photosynthetic seasonality of global tropical forests constrained by hydroclimate. Nat Geosci. 2015;8: 284–289. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2382

56. Wu J, Albert LP, Lopes AP, Restrepo-Coupe N, Hayek M, Wiedemann KT, et al. Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests. Science (80-). 2016;351: 972–976. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5068 26917771

57. Morton DC, Nagol J, Carabajal CC, Rosette J, Palace M, Cook BD, et al. Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2014;506: 221–224. doi: 10.1038/nature13006 24499816

58. Wujeska-Klause A, Bossinger G, Tausz M. Responses to heatwaves of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidants ascorbic acid and glutathione in congeneric pairs of Acacia and Eucalyptus species from relatively cooler and warmer climates. Trees—Struct Funct. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015;29: 1929–1941. doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1274-4

59. Restrepo-Coupe N, da Rocha HR, Hutyra LR, da Araujo AC, Borma LS, Christoffersen B, et al. What drives the seasonality of photosynthesis across the Amazon basin? A cross-site analysis of eddy flux tower measurements from the Brasil flux network. Agric For Meteorol. Elsevier B.V.; 2013;182–183: 128–144. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.031

60. Verbeeck H, Peylin P, Bacour C, Bonal D, Steppe K, Ciais P. Seasonal patterns of CO 2 fluxes in Amazon forests: Fusion of eddy covariance data and the ORCHIDEE model. J Geophys Res. 2011;116: 1–19. doi: 10.1029/2010jg001544

61. Gunasekera HKLK, Costa W a JMDE, Nugawela A. Canopy Photosynthetic Capacity and Light Response Parameters of Rubber Hevea brasiliensis with. Curr Agric Res J. 2013;1: 1–12.

62. Ding L, Wang KJ, Jiang GM, Li YG, Jiang CD, Liu MZ, et al. Diurnal variation of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and xanthophyll cycle components of maize hybrids released in different years. Photosynthetica. 2006;44: 26–31. doi: 10.1007/s11099-005-0154-3

63. Yao X, Li C, Li S, Zhu Q, Zhang H, Wang H, et al. Effect of shade on leaf photosynthetic capacity, light-intercepting, electron transfer and energy distribution of soybeans. Plant Growth Regul. Springer Netherlands; 2017;83: 409–416. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0307-y


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Současné pohledy na riziko v parodontologii
nový kurz
Autoři: MUDr. Ladislav Korábek, CSc., MBA

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Petr Němec, Ph.D.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
Autoři: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#