Double-Edge Sword of Sustained ROCK Activation in Prion Diseases through Neuritogenesis Defects and Prion Accumulation
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs), commonly named prion diseases, are caused by deposition in the brain of pathogenic prions PrPSc that trigger massive neuronal death. Because of our poor understanding of the mechanisms sustaining prion-induced neurodegeneration, there is to date no effective medicine to combat TSEs. The current study demonstrates that ROCK kinases are overactivated in prion-infected cells and contribute to prion pathogenesis at two levels. First, PrPSc-induced ROCK overactivation affects neuronal polarity with synapse disconnection, axon/dendrite degradation, and disturbs neuronal functions. Second, ROCK overactivity amplifies the production of pathogenic prions. The pharmacological inhibition of ROCK protects diseased neurons from PrPSc toxicity by preserving neuronal architecture and functions and lowering PrPSc level. Inhibition of ROCK in prion-infected mice reduces brain PrPSc levels, improves motor activity and extends lifespan. This study opens up new avenues to design ROCK-based therapeutic strategies to fight TSEs.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Pathog 11(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005073
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005073
Summary
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs), commonly named prion diseases, are caused by deposition in the brain of pathogenic prions PrPSc that trigger massive neuronal death. Because of our poor understanding of the mechanisms sustaining prion-induced neurodegeneration, there is to date no effective medicine to combat TSEs. The current study demonstrates that ROCK kinases are overactivated in prion-infected cells and contribute to prion pathogenesis at two levels. First, PrPSc-induced ROCK overactivation affects neuronal polarity with synapse disconnection, axon/dendrite degradation, and disturbs neuronal functions. Second, ROCK overactivity amplifies the production of pathogenic prions. The pharmacological inhibition of ROCK protects diseased neurons from PrPSc toxicity by preserving neuronal architecture and functions and lowering PrPSc level. Inhibition of ROCK in prion-infected mice reduces brain PrPSc levels, improves motor activity and extends lifespan. This study opens up new avenues to design ROCK-based therapeutic strategies to fight TSEs.
Introduction
In neurodegenerative disorders including Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs), it is now admitted that neuronal death is a late event in the neurodegenerative process preceded by an early loss of neuronal polarity at the root of behavioral and cognitive deficits [1–4]. In TSEs, synapse retraction and progressive axonal degeneration correlate with brain accumulation of the scrapie protein (PrPSc), which is the essential component of infectious prions [5]. PrPSc is an abnormally folded self-propagating isoform of cellular prion protein (PrPC), a physiological cell-surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI)-anchored protein. The neurotoxic effects of PrPSc depend on the neuronal expression of PrPC since the suppression of PrPC in neurons of infected mice, just prior to the clinical phase, hampers PrPSc-induced neuronal loss [6–8]. For instance, prion-associated neurotoxicity relates to subversion of PrPC function(s) in neurons following the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc [9–12].
From a physiological point of view, by acting as a signaling and/or a scaffolding molecule, PrPC plays a central role in neuritogenesis able to promote the sprouting, outgrowth and maintenance of neurites [13,14]. PrPC involvement in the very initial phase of neuritogenesis is supported by the observation that siRNA-mediated PrPC silencing in 1C11 neuronal stem cells or PC12 cells (PrPnull-cells) impairs neurite sprouting accompanying neuronal differentiation [15]. This PrPC role relies on its capacity to control the signaling activity of plasma membrane β1 integrins, the downstream activity of RhoA-associated coiled-coil containing kinases (ROCK) and the dynamics of actin microfilaments [15]. In the absence of PrPC, overactivated ROCK reduces the turnover of actin fibers and exerts a dominant negative effect on the sprouting of neurites [15]. In differentiating and mature neurons, PrPC influences neurite outgrowth and maintenance as well as synapse connectivity through its interaction with a set of diverse partners (N-CAM, STI-1, laminin γ-1, mGluR1-5, α7-nAChR) depending on the neuronal type [16–21] and the fine-tuning of Rho-GTPase and ROCK activities [14]. Besides, because neuritogenesis is intimately linked to the expression of neuronal functions, ROCK may hence take part to the onset, regulation and integration of neurotransmitter-associated functions. Whether PrPSc-mediated corruption of the functional relationship between PrPC and ROCK accounts for neuronal polarity alterations and abnormal neuronal functions, and contributes to TSEs progression, remains unknown.
To address these issues, we mainly exploit the properties of the 1C11 neuroectodermal cell line, which is endowed with the capacity to develop neurites and to acquire all functional properties of serotonergic neurons (1C115-HT) within four days upon appropriate induction [22], and is chronically infected by mouse-adapted prions derived from scrapie (22L) or a human familial prion disease (Fukuoka-1, Fk) [23]. We previously reported that prion infection disturbs all neurotransmitter-associated functions in prion-infected 1C115-HT neuronal cells and triggers the production of neurotoxins, i.e. oxidative derivatives of serotonin [23]. In this study, we also take advantage of primary cultures of mature cerebellar granule neurons and of a cortico-striatal neuronal network reconstructed on microfluidic chips to assess the impact of prion infection on synapse connectivity and neurite integrity. We show here that prion infection impairs the development of neurites in the 1C11 neuronal stem cell line and triggers synapse disconnection and neurite degeneration in primary cultures of neurons. Defects in neuronal polarity originate from prion-induced overactivation of ROCK activity. Antagonizing ROCK activity rescues neurite sprouting of prion-infected 1C11 cells and protects prion-infected mature neurons from neurite degeneration. The beneficial effect afforded by ROCK inhibition on neuronal polarization is associated with restoration of neurotransmitter-associated functions and decrease of serotonin-derived neurotoxins levels.
Importantly, ROCK overactivation contributes to TSEs pathogenesis by stimulating the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc. We recently evidenced that PrPSc formation relates to a defect of cell surface TACE α-secretase neuroprotective activity towards PrPC caused by the overactivation of the 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) [24]. We demonstrate here that ROCK interact with and phosphorylate PDK1 leading to PDK1 overactivation in prion-infected cells. Inhibition of ROCK disrupts the ROCK-PDK1 complex, lowers PDK1 activity, rescues TACE activity at the plasma membrane and induces strong reduction of PrPSc level in prion-infected neuronal cells. Finally, inhibiting ROCK in mouse models of prion infection mitigates prion diseases.
Results
Prion infection of 1C11 neuronal stem cells impairs the onset of neurites through a ROCK-dependent mechanism
When Fk- or 22L-infected 1C11 precursor cells were induced to differentiate towards the serotonergic program, less than 20% of Fk- and 22L-infected cells converted into neuronal-like cells with small, rounded cell bodies and bipolar extensions undistinguishable from uninfected 1C115-HT neuronal cells. The other 80% fraction did not adopt a neural-like morphology and/or presented spindle shaped cell bodies harboring wide and short extensions (Fig 1A).
These defects in neuronal polarization recall the impairment of neurite sprouting caused by PrPC silencing in 1C11 progenitors and PC12 cells [15]. We previously showed that PrPC depletion triggers the clustering and overactivation of β1 integrins, which in turn promote overactivation of the RhoA-ROCK-LIMK-cofilin pathway leading to alterations of F-actin architecture and subsequent gain of cell contractility [15]. In line with this, cell surface PrPC immunolabeling under native conditions revealed that more than 90% of Fk-infected cells displayed very little fluorescence, while uninfected 1C11 cells stained brightly and uniformly (Fig 1B). This suggests a thorough conversion of cell surface PrPC into PrPSc and in fine depletion of PrPC molecules normally present at the plasma membrane of infected cells. PrPSc immunolabeling with PrPSc reacting ICSM33 antibody [25] under denatured conditions with guanidine thiocyanate indeed showed a high level of PrPSc in Fk-infected 1C11 cells (Fig 1B).
PrPC conversion into PrPSc had no impact on total β1 integrin expression level as assessed by western blotting using the anti-CD29 antibody (Fig 1C). Nevertheless, cell surface immunofluorescence analyses using a β1 integrin antibody (9EG7) specifically targeting activated β1 integrins revealed that the pool of activated integrins was ~2-fold increased in Fk-infected cells as compared to uninfected 1C11 cells (Fig 1B). In addition, active β1 integrins were evenly distributed and displayed a dot-like staining at the cell periphery of uninfected 1C11 cells, while they clustered and formed elongated patches in Fk-infected 1C11 cells (Fig 1B).
As compared to uninfected cells, we measured increases by 2- to 3-fold in RhoA GTPase activity (Fig 1C), the phosphorylation level of LIMK1/2 on Thr505 and Thr508 (Fig 1B and 1C), and the phosphorylation level of cofilin on Ser3 (Fig 1B and 1C) in Fk- and 22L-infected 1C11 cells, indicating that prion infection reduces cofilin-associated severing activity towards F-Actin [26–29]. Accordingly, fibrillar actin (F-actin) microfilaments were large and disorganized in the cytoplasm of Fk-infected 1C11 cells, while F-actin distributed as thin, parallel stress fibers underneath the cell plasma membrane of uninfected 1C11 precursor cells (Fig 1B).
These overall data show that prion infection triggers overactivation of the RhoA-ROCK-LIMK-cofilin signaling pathway, which alters the architecture and turnover of F-actin microfilaments, thereby contributing to neuritogenesis impairment.
ROCK inhibition in prion-infected 1C11 cells restores neuritogenesis and rescues overall neurotransmitter-associated functions
We next wondered whether inhibiting ROCK activity would counteract prion-induced neuritogenesis defects. When treated with two distinct ROCK inhibitors, namely Y-27632 (100 μM) or dimethylfasudil (2 μM) (for review see [30–32] and references therein), ~90% of Fk- or 22L-infected 1C11 cells induced to differentiate along the serotonergic pathway developed neurites. At the end of the program (day 4), prion-infected 1C11 cells differentiated in the presence of ROCK inhibitors (referred to as Rocki-infected 1C115-HT cells) exhibited neurites that were thin, bipolar and extended from the ovoid cell body as for uninfected 1C115-HT neuronal cells (S1 Fig and S1 Table). The mean neurite length of Rocki-infected 1C115-HT cells was comparable to that of uninfected 1C115-HT cells differentiated in the presence of ROCK inhibitors (S1 Table). Rescued neuritogenesis by Fk-infected 1C11 precursor cells upon ROCK inhibition was associated with decrease to basal level of phospho-cofilin level on Ser 3 (Fig 2A), which restores cofilin severing activity towards F-actin and renders Fk-1C11 precursor cells competent to sprout neurites when induced towards the neuronal program [15].
Beyond the rescue of neuronal polarity, inhibition of ROCK restores the overall neuronal functions, i.e. synthesis, storage, degradation and transport of 5-HT, in Rocki-infected 1C115-HT cells. While the activity of tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), the 5-HT synthesizing enzyme, in Fk-1C115-HT cells represented 5% of that measured with uninfected 1C115-HT cells, TPH activity increased by 8- to 18-fold in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells treated with Y-27632 or dimethylfasudil, respectively (Fig 2B). Corroborating TPH activity, western blot analysis revealed that the TPH2 enzyme was weakly present in Fk-1C115HT cells compared to uninfected 1C115-HT cells, while TPH2 expression was recovered in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells (Fig 2B). This indicates that PrPSc-induced ROCK overactivation impairs TPH protein synthesis.
Using the paroxetine Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitor (SRI) antidepressant to count functional Serotonin Transporter (SERT) molecules [33], we showed that the number of functional SERT proteins was 5- (Y-27632) to 7- (dimethylfasudil) fold enhanced in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells as compared to Fk-1C115-HT cells (where functional SERT level was 10% of that measured with uninfected 1C115-HT cells) (Fig 2C), indicating that inhibition of ROCK rescues SERT functionality. By contrast with TPH2 enzyme, no significant variation in SERT protein level could be evidenced between Fk-1C115-HT, Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT and uninfected 1C115-HT cells (Fig 2C). This indicates that the impact of prion infection on SERT activity does not relate to modulation of SERT synthesis.
Using [3H]-tetrabenazine that selectively binds to the Vesicular Monoamine Transporter (VMAT), we monitored that antagonizing ROCK activity restored 5-HT storage in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells with a tetrabenazine binding value that was 2- (Y-27632) to 2.5- (dimethylfasudil) fold increased as compared to Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells (30% of that measured with uninfected 1C115-HT cells) (Fig 2D). Restoration of normal serotonergic neuronal functions upon ROCK inhibition was further supported by a 10- (Y-27632) to 15- (dimethylfasudil) fold increase of 5-HT content (Fig 2E), decreased levels (30 to 40%) of the 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA) degradative product of 5-HT (Fig 2F), and deep reduction (50 to 70%) in the intracellular content of serotonin-derived oxidized neurotoxins (Fig 2G).
Altogether, these data demonstrate that inhibition of ROCK activity in prion-infected 1C11 cells rescues neuritogenesis and the overall serotonergic-associated functions.
Prion infection of primary neurons triggers synapse disconnection and neurite degeneration through a ROCK-dependent mechanism
To extend our study to mature neurons, we combined the use of primary cultures of mouse cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs) and of a reconstructed cortico-striatal neuronal network grown on microfluidic chips [34–36]. CGNs are helpful to probe the effect of prion infection on the axon and dendrites [37,38]. The reconstructed cortico-striatal network on microfluidic device offers the possibility to infect cortical neurons in the somato-dendritic side and to monitor the impact of prion infection at distance on synapse connectivity between cortical and striatal neurons.
We showed that infection of CGNs with 22L strain triggered neuronal dysfunction as inferred by the fragmentation of axon and dendrites by 11 days post-infection (dpi), using SMI31 and MAP2 as markers of the axon and dendrites, respectively (Fig 3A). Western blot analyses revealed a 2-fold increase in cofilin phosphorylation level in 22L-infected CGNs vs. uninfected CGNs (Fig 3B), indicative of an overactivation of ROCK in infected CGNs. Treatment of 22L-infected CGNs with the ROCK inhibitors Y-27632 (100 μM) or dimethylfasudil (2 μM) at 7 dpi for 4 days exerted a protective effect towards PrPSc-induced neurite degeneration, since ~70 to 90% of treated infected neurons displayed unfragmented dendrites and axon (Fig 3A). Such protective effect of ROCK inhibitors on axon and dendrites of 22L-infected CGNs relates to rescued cofilin activity as shown by cofilin phosphorylation level that returned to basal level upon cell treatment with either Y-27632 or dimethylfasudil (Fig 3B).
With reconstructed cortico-striatal networks, we observed that challenging the cortical compartment with 22L strain promoted disconnection and retraction of synapses between cortical and striatal neurons by 11 dpi, as inferred by pre-synaptic cortical v-GLUT1 immunostaining no longer colocalized with post-synaptic striatal dendrite MAP2 staining (Fig 3C). ROCK inhibition with Y-27632 (20 μM) or dimethylfasudil (2 μM) applied in the striatal chamber by 7 dpi for 4 days attenuated PrPSc-induced neuronal disconnection and synapse retraction by ~100% (Fig 3C).
As a whole, our data indicate that prion-induced ROCK activation in mature neurons disrupts neuronal polarity and connectivity. Inhibition of ROCK activity protects neurons from prion-induced synapse disconnection and dendrite/axon degeneration.
ROCK inhibition promotes strong reduction of PrPSc level by rescuing TACE α-secretase-mediated PrPC α-cleavage in a PDK1-dependent manner
We next investigated whether PrPSc accumulation in prion-infected cells would depend on ROCK overactivity. Inhibition of ROCK with dimethylfasudil (2 μM) or Y-27632 (100 μM) decreased the amount of proteinase K-resistant PrPSc (PrPres) by 80 to 90% in either Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells (Fig 4A) or primary cultures of 22L-infected CGNs (Fig 4B). These observations introduce ROCK overactivation as a novel pathogenic event contributing to the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc.
We recently reported that accumulation of PrPSc in prion diseases relates to internalization of TACE α-secretase in caveolin-1 (Cav-1)-enriched microvesicles caused by PDK1 overactivation, which cancels PrPC neuroprotective α-cleavage by TACE [24]. The question was thus to assess whether the reduction of PrPSc level measured upon ROCK inhibition would depend on a control of the PDK1-TACE module by ROCK. Inhibition of ROCK with Y-27632 (100 μM, 1h) promoted translocation of TACE back to the cell surface of Fk-1C115-HT cells (Fig 4C) and 22L-infected CGNs (S2A Fig). Detergent-free sucrose gradient membrane fractionation of cell extracts followed by western blotting further revealed that TACE no longer co-distributed with Cav-1 in Fk-1C115-HT cells exposed to Y-27632, but was found together with the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) at the plasma membrane of infected 1C115-HT cells as observed with uninfected 1C115-HT cells (Fig 4D). With Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells differentiated for 4 days in the presence of Y-27632, TACE was at the plasma membrane of both the cell body and neurites with a distribution pattern highly comparable to that of uninfected 1C115-HT cells (Fig 4E).
Redirection of TACE to the cell surface of infected cells upon ROCK inhibition rescued TACE-mediated α-cleavage of PrP between residues 111/112 and generated an N-terminal truncated fragment (that is, membrane C1) (Figs 4F and S2B) that does not convert into PrPSc [39]. In Fk-1C115-HT cells and 22L-CGNs, the ratio between PrP C1 fragment and full length PrP (native) was reduced by approximately 75% as compared to that of uninfected cells (Figs 4F and S2B), thus accounting for conversion of PrPC into PrPSc. In infected cells treated with Y-27632 (100 μM) for 6 h the C1/native ratio was ~2- to 3-fold increased compared to untreated infected cells (Figs 4F and S2B), indicative of restored PrPC α-cleavage. Such an increase in C1/native ratio in the presence of the ROCK inhibitor depends on TACE activity, since inhibition of TACE with TAPI-2 (100 μM, 1h) counteracted the effects of Y-27632 on PrP neuroprotective cleavage (Figs 4F and S2B).
Finally, while PDK1 activity was 2- to 3-fold increased in Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells (Fig 4G) and 22L-infected CGNs (S2C Fig), ROCK inhibition in Fk-1C115-HT cells or 22L-CGNs with Y-27632 (100μM, 1h) reduced PDK1 activity by ~50 to 70% to basal level measured with uninfected cells (Figs 4G and S2C). Of note, bombardment of Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells with tungsten microprojectiles coated with ROCK-I antibodies [24,40] restored basal PDK1 activity, while tungsten microprojectiles coated with ROCK-II antibodies triggered less reduction of PDK1 activity (~45%) (Fig 4G), indicating that ROCK-I overactivity within an infectious context mainly contributes to the overactivation of PDK1. The rise in PDK1 activity was also counteracted in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells differentiated for 4 days in the presence of Y-27632 (Fig 4G), further demonstrating that the control of PDK1 activity by ROCK-I occurs in polarized cells as well as in non-polarized Fk-1C115-HT cells.
These overall data firmly establish that ROCK act as upstream positive regulators of PDK1 activity and contribute to prion-induced neurodegeneration by favoring the production of PrPSc.
ROCK-I interacts with PDK1 and promotes PDK1 phosphorylation
The acute regulation of PDK1 activity relies on a complex interplay between PDK1 phosphorylation, subcellular localization, binding of regulators and conformational changes (for review see [41] and references therein). To investigate how ROCK-I regulates PDK1 activity, we designed a first set of experiments centered on the interaction between ROCK-I and PDK1. In uninfected 1C115-HT cells, ROCK-I immunoprecipitation followed by PDK1 western blotting revealed that ROCK-I interacts with PDK1 (Fig 5A). In Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells, the fraction of PDK1 interacting with ROCK-I was ~2-fold increased compared to uninfected cells (Fig 5A). Of note, the level of ROCK-I did not vary between uninfected 1C115-HT and Fk-1C115-HT cells (Fig 5A). The rise in ROCK activity induced by PrPSc thus increases the number of PDK1 molecules recruited by ROCK-I. Exposure of uninfected 1C115-HT or Fk-1C115-HT cells to Y-27632 (100 μM) for 1h dissociated the ROCK-I / PDK1 complex by ~70% and ~90%, respectively (Fig 5A), further indicating that the ROCK-I-kinase activity is necessary for its association with PDK1.
To next probe whether ROCK-I phosphorylates PDK1, cells treated or not with Y-27632 (100 μM, 1h) were metabolically labeled for 60 min with [32P]-orthophosphate (8.81 μCi.mL−1) and [32P]-labeled PDK1 level was quantified after PDK1 immunoprecipitation and western blotting. In uninfected 1C115-HT cells, PDK1 phosphorylation level was reduced by ~70% in the presence of Y-27632 (Fig 5B), indicating that ROCK-I does phosphorylate PDK1 under physiological conditions. From a mechanistic point of view, autophosphorylation of PDK1 Ser241 is critical but not sufficient to induce PDK1 full activity [42]. Depending on the cell type and signaling pathways converging on PDK1, additional phosphorylations on Ser, Thr and Tyr residues located in the kinase domain, the pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain and in the linker between the kinase and PH domains have already been shown to enhance PDK1 activity in a more or less cooperative manner [41,43]. Here, we provide evidence that PDK1 autophosphorylation at Ser241 precedes PDK1 phosphorylation by ROCK-I on yet-to-be identified residues. Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis of PDK1 Ser241 into Ala to mimic a constitutive dephosphorylation (S241A) state decreased by ~90% the incorporation of 32P on the S241A PDK1 mutant when transfected into 1C115-HT cells (Fig 5B). Besides, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that ROCK-I did not complex with the S241A PDK1 mutant (Fig 5A). These data establish that autophosphorylation of PDK1 Ser241 is essential for PDK1 interaction with ROCK and further phosphorylation by ROCK.
We next examined the phosphorylation status of PDK1 within an infectious context. The level of phosphorylated PDK1 was 2-fold higher in Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells than in uninfected cells (Fig 5B). Such increase in PDK1 phosphorylation level was cancelled upon treatment of Fk-1C115-HT cells with Y-27632 (100 μM) for 1h or in Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells left to differentiate for 4 days in the presence of Y-27632 (Fig 5B), indicating that prion-induced ROCK overactivity enhances PDK1 phosphorylation level and that ROCK-induced phosphorylation of PDK1 is independent on the acquisition of neuronal polarity.
As a whole, our data reveal that ROCK-I constitutively complexes with and phosphorylates PDK1 in uninfected cells. Autophosphorylation of PDK1 at Ser241 is a prerequisite for PDK1 interaction with ROCK-I and further phosphorylation by ROCK-I. In prion-infected cells, ROCK overactivation augments by 2-fold the pool of PDK1 molecules interacting with and phosphorylated by ROCK-I, which thus enhances PDK1 activity.
Antagonizing ROCK activity improves disease in mouse models of prion infection
In adult C57BL/6J mice inoculated with the mouse-adapted scrapie strain 22L via the intracerebellar route [44] and sacrificed at 130 days post infection (dpi) just before the symptomatic phase, a marked increase in phosphorylated cofilin immunostaining that matched with PrPSc deposition was observed in the brain of prion-infected mice in both the cerebellar cortex (CBCX) and deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) compared to uninfected animals (SHAM) (Fig 6A and 6B). Western-blot analyses of cerebellum extracts indicated a ~2 to 3-fold increased level of phosphorylated cofilin in 22L-infected vs. SHAM mice (Fig 6C).
Because increased cofilin phosphorylation in the brain of prion-infected mice argues for ROCK overactivity in vivo, we next wondered whether inhibition of ROCK would attenuate prion disease. Y-27632, known to easily cross the Blood Brain Barrier [30], was first chronically injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) in adult C57BL/6J mice starting 130 days after infection and before the onset of clinical signs (140 days). We showed that Y-27632 treatment delayed mortality in 22L-infected mice as compared to untreated mice (181.4 +/- 4.7 days versus 166.0 +/- 1.8 days, n = 10, P < 0.0001, Fig 6D) with no overt sign of Y-27632 toxicity. Reduction of phosphorylated cofilin level in post-mortem cerebellum extracts from 22L-infected mice upon Y-27632 treatment indicated ROCK inhibition in brain (Fig 6C). Y-27632 infusion also decreased prion infection-induced impairments in motor function (Fig 6E). While in 22L-infected mice the mean static rod score dropped to 10 by 145 days, in Y-27632-treated infected mice, the mean static rod score never dropped below 10. In SHAM mice, motor coordination was non-sensitive to Y-27632 treatment.
We further showed that the beneficial effect of ROCK inhibition against prion disease correlated with decreased levels of PrPSc. Post-mortem quantifications of proteinase K-resistant PrP revealed a ~30% reduction in PrPres level in the brains of 22L-infected mice infused with Y-27632 compared to untreated infected animals (Fig 6F), indicative of PDK1 down-regulation (Fig 6G), TACE relocation to the plasma membrane (Fig 6H) and rescue of PrPC α-cleavage by TACE upon ROCK inhibition in vivo (Fig 6I). Accordingly, while PDK1 activity was ~3-fold enhanced in the brain of 22L-infected mice compared to SHAM mice, PDK1 activity decreased by ~50% in prion-infected mice treated with Y-27632 vs. untreated infected mice (Fig 6G). As for prion-infected 1C115-HT cells and CGNs, reduction of PDK1 activity in the brain of 22L-infected mice infused with Y-27632 originated from disruption of the ROCK-PDK1 complex (Fig 6J).
Finally, C57Bl/6J mice inoculated with 22L prions were also intraperitonealy injected with dimethylfasudil following the same procedure as for Y-27632. ROCK inhibition with dimethylfasudil prolonged the survival time of infected mice compared to untreated mice (174.8 +/- 4.3 days versus 166.0 +/- 1.8 days, n = 10, P < 0.0001, S3A Fig), reduced phospho-cofilin level in the cerebellum (S3B Fig), counteracted prion-induced motor deficits (S3C Fig), decreased brain PrPSc level by 30% (S3D Fig), as a consequence of dissociation of the ROCK/PDK1 complex (S3E Fig) and reduction of PDK1 activity (S3F Fig).
Altogether, these data demonstrate that targeting ROCK activity mitigates prion diseases.
Discussion
Our findings indicate that PrPSc-induced ROCK overactivity contributes to neuronal cell demise at two levels: through (i) alterations of neuronal polarity, connectivity and neurotransmitter-associated functions and (ii) amplification of the production of neurotoxic PrPSc. ROCK inhibition not only restores neuritogenesis and neurotransmitter-associated functions, but also reduces the production of PrPSc, which thereby lengthens the survival of prion-infected mice (Fig 7).
The rise in ROCK activity in prion-infected cells originates from loss of PrPC regulatory function towards the RhoA-ROCK-LIMK-cofilin pathway [15] upon PrPC conversion into PrPSc. Downstream modifications of F-actin structure and dynamics impair the onset of neurites by differentiating 1C11 neuronal stem cells, disrupt synapse connectivity and provoke neurite degradation in primary neuronal cultures. Our data provide evidence that PrPSc-induced ROCK overactivation exerts a dominant negative effect on neuronal polarity since the sole inhibition of ROCK is sufficient to restore neurite sprouting and protect mature neurons from prion-induced axon and dendrite alterations. The beneficial effect afforded by ROCK inhibition on neuritogenesis and neuronal architecture relates to rescued cofilin-mediated severing of F-actin and improved actin dynamics in prion-infected cells. This however does not exclude that modulation of other signaling effectors known to regulate neuronal outgrowth downstream from ROCK, such as profilin IIa [45], also partakes to restoration of neuronal morphology upon ROCK inhibition.
Our data further show that prion infection of 1C11 neuronal stem cells alters the coupling between cell morphogenesis and the acquisition of neuronal functions. Inhibition of ROCK not only restores neuritogenesis but also rescues the overall neurotransmitter-associated functions. How the inhibition of ROCK permits to restore neuronal functions has however not been deciphered. Neuritogenesis and the onset of neurotransmitter-functions are interconnected events since the actin cytoskeleton directs the transport of specific mRNAs and proteins [46–48] and acts as a scaffold that orchestrates local protein translation [47,49,50] within axons and dendrites. Of note, all the mRNAs coding for neuronal functions are expressed in 1C11 cells at the stem cell stage but are dormant [51]. Prion infection does not impact on the expression level of these mRNAs (S4 Fig). The drastic reduction of Tryptophan Hydroxylase-2 (TPH2) expression measured in prion-infected 1C115-HT neurons might thus originate from abnormal trafficking of TPH2 mRNA and/or compromised translation. Interestingly, overphosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eiF2α, subsequent decrease of its activity and repression of protein synthesis have been shown to contribute to the progression of prion diseases [52]. Whether rescue of TPH2 protein synthesis upon ROCK inhibition relates to a restoration of eiF2α activity needs further investigation. By contrast with TPH2, the loss of Serotonin Transporter (SERT) functionality within an infectious context does not originate from reduced SERT expression, indicating that PrPSc interferes with the translation of specific mRNAs. Rescue of SERT activity upon ROCK inhibition may alternatively be linked to reduction of the intracellular concentration of serotonin-oxidized neurotoxins that are assumed to poison the SERT protein [23], corroborating the antioxidant effect of ROCK inhibition [53,54].
A major output of this work is the reduction, upon ROCK inhibition, of PrPSc level in prion-infected cells or in the brain of 22L-infected mice. Such reduction in brain PrPSc likely accounts for improved motor function and increased survival of prion-infected animals treated with the ROCK inhibitor. In this work, we decipher how ROCK contributes to the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc. Under physiological conditions ROCK-I acts as positive regulator of PDK1 activity. ROCK-I interacts with and phosphorylates PDK1. At a mechanistic level, prior autophosphorylation of Ser241 in the kinase domain of PDK1 is necessary to ROCK-I interaction and subsequent PDK1 phosphorylation by ROCK-I, suggesting that PDK1 phosphorylation at Ser241 induces conformational changes unmasking binding site(s) for ROCK-I and/or phosphorylatable residues by ROCK-I. Additional phosphorylation of PDK1 by ROCK-I improves the stability of the ROCK-I/PDK1 complex. In prion-infected cells, the rise in ROCK activity increases the pool of PDK1 molecules interacting with and phosphorylated by ROCK-I at the root of the PDK1 activity overboost within an infectious context (Fig 7). Such ROCK-dependent overstimulation of PDK1 activity in turn cancels plasma membrane TACE neuroprotective α-cleavage of PrPC and thereby favors the production of PrPSc [24]. We previously showed that a rise in Src kinases-PI3K signaling in prion-infected cells also enhanced PDK1 activity [24], likely as the result of an accelerated PDK1 docking to the plasma membrane by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and subsequent phosphorylation by Src kinases [41,43]. Inhibition of ROCK in prion-infected cells is however sufficient to decrease PDK1 activity up to its basal level as does the sole inhibition of Src kinases or PI3K [24], thus suggesting that the Src kinases-PI3K and ROCK pathways are both required for overstimulation of PDK1 activity within an infectious context.
Inhibition of ROCK has been shown to exert beneficial effects towards other amyloid-based neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s (AD) [55] or Parkinson’s diseases [56,57]. In mouse models with AD-like pathology, decreased levels of neurotoxic amyloid Aβ peptides upon ROCK inhibition have been attributed to disruption of amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid precursor protein APP by the β-secretase BACE [58]. In brain samples from AD subjects as well as in three mouse models with AD-like pathology, PDK1 overactivity was also shown to contribute to the accumulation of Aβ40/42 peptides and the progression of AD by cancelling the non-amyloidogenic processing of APP by TACE [24]. By showing that ROCK overactivation is a novel pathogenic event in TSEs and that ROCK control PDK1 activity, we propose that the beneficial effect afforded by ROCK inhibition against AD also reflects down-regulation of PDK1 activity and rescue of TACE α-secretase activity towards APP. In any case, in the absence of effective medicine, further understanding the functional interplay between ROCK and PDK1 may help to design novel therapeutic strategies for amyloid-based neurodegenerative disorders.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies
The rat monoclonal CD9 antibody was a kind gift from E. Rubinstein (Inserm, Villejuif, France) [59]. The mouse monoclonal SAF32 PrP antibody was from SPI-Bio (Montigny Le Bretoneux, France). The mouse monoclonal ICSM33 PrP antibody was from D-Gen Limited (London, UK). The mouse monoclonal anti-CD29 (β1 integrin) antibody was from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY, USA). The rat monoclonal 9EG7 anti-activated β1 integrin antibody [60] was from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). The mouse monoclonal antibody to α-tubulin was from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA). The rabbit polyclonal antibody targeting phospho-LIMK1/2 (pThr505 and pThr508) was from AbCam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies toward LIMK1 and cofilin were from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA). The rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-Ser3-cofilin antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SantaCruz, CA, USA). The rabbit polyclonal anti-TPH2 antibody was from Genway (San Diego, CA, USA). The rabbit polyclonal anti-SERT antibody was from Chemicon (Temecula, CA, USA). The rabbit polyclonal antibody to MAP2, the mouse polyclonal antibody to phospho-NFL200 (SMI31) and the guinea pig polyclonal anti-v-GLUT1 antibody were from EMD Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany). Rabbit polyclonal antibody to TACE was purchased from QED Bioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). The rabbit polyclonal antibodies to caveolin-1 (Cav-1) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) were from Transduction laboratories (Lexington, KY, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SantaCruz, CA, USA), respectively. The rabbit monoclonal ROCK-I and polyclonal ROCK-II and PDK1 antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA). When nonspecified, primary antibodies were used at 0.5 μg ml−1 for western blot experiments and at 5 μg ml−1 for immunofluorescence experiments.
Ethics statement
Adult C57Bl/6J mice were bred and underwent experiments in level-3 biological risk containment, respecting European guidelines for the care and ethical use of laboratory animals (Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes). Mice received intracerebral inoculation of the cerebellotropic 22L scrapie strain [44] (CNRS Strasbourg, France). All animal procedures were approved by the Comité Régional d’Ethique en Matière d’Expérimentation Animale de Strasbourg (France; CEEA35 ref AL/01/01/01/13) and the Animal Care and Use Committee at Basel University (Switzerland).
Chronic intraperitoneal injection of Y-27632 or dimethylfasudil into mice
Mice were fasted overnight but allowed water ad libitum before the experiment. They were then anesthetized with isoflurane inhalation, and a midline incision was performed to insert into the peritoneum the polyethylene catheter of an osmotic pump (Alzet, Cupertino, CA, USA). Y-27632, dimethylfasudil or vehicle (1% DMSO in sterile normal saline buffer) was administered at a flow rate of 0.25 μL h-1, which corresponded to 100 μg per mouse per day (5 mg kg−1 per day for Y-27632 and 3 mg kg−1 per day for dimethylfasudil). Pumps were replaced every 4 weeks.
Behavioral testing
Motor function in 22L-infected mice was assessed by the static rod test [61].
Cell culture and prion infection
1C11 cells chronically infected or not by the mouse-adapted 22L or Fukuoka (Fk) strains [23] were grown and induced to differentiate along the serotonergic (1C115-HT) pathway [22]. Primary CGNs were isolated from dissociated cerebella of 4- to 5-day-old C57Bl/6J mice and infected by the 22L strain [37,38].
Cortico-striatal network with microfluidic chips
“Axon diode” microfluidic chips were designed and fabricated as previously described [34]. Briefly, Polydimethylsiloxane (Sylgard 184, PDMS, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) was mixed with a curing agent (9:1 ratio) and degassed under vacuum. The resulting preparation was poured onto a polyester resin replicate and reticulated at 70°C for 2 h. The elastomeric polymer print was detached and two reservoirs were punched for each macro-channel. The resulting piece was cleaned with isopropanol and dried. The polymer print and a glass cover slip were treated for 200 sec in an air plasma generator (98% power, 0.6 mBar, Diener Electronic, Ebhausen, Germany) and bonded together. The chips were then coated with a solution of poly-D-lysine (10 μg ml-1, Sigma; St. Louis, MO, USA) overnight and washed with PBS before cell seeding.
Embryonic cortical and striatal neurons were obtained and cultured as previously described [34,35]. Briefly, cortices and ganglionic eminences (striatal neurons) were micro-dissected from E14 embryos of C57Bl/6J pregnant mice and digested with papaïn (20 U ml-1 in DMEM, Sigma Aldrich). Cortices and Striata were mechanically dissociated and neurons were collected by centrifugation. Cells were then re-suspended for plating in DMEM-Glutamax I (Life Technologies) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin (Life Technologies), N2 and B27 supplements (Life Technologies) and 5% FBS (PAA). ~105 cortical neurons and ~2.4 x 104 striatal neurons were seeded respectively in cortical and striatal compartments, as described before [34]. Microfluidic chips were incubated at 37°C in humid atmosphere with 5% CO2. The culture medium was renewed every 7 days. Upon time of interest, cells were fixed using a 4% PFA, 4% sucrose solution diluted in PBS and further processed by immuno-cytochemistry with anti MAP2, α- tubulin and v-GLUT1 antibodies.
Immunofluorescent labeling and F-actin visualization
Immunofluorescent labeling of PrPC, PrPSc, β1 integrins, phospho-LIMK1/2, phospho-cofilin, TACE, MAP2, phospho-NFL200, and v-Glut1 was performed using standard protocols as reported in [15,37]. F-actin was stained using TRITC-phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as in [15]. Labelings were analyzed using a Leica DMI6000 B microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) and subjected to image analysis with AQUA software [62].
Cell extract preparation, PNGase assay and western blot analyses
Cells were washed in PBS/Ca2+/Mg2+ and incubated for 30 min at 4°C in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM Na3VO4 and protease inhibitors (Roche)). After centrifugation of the lysate (14,000g, 15 min), the protein concentration in the supernatant was measured with the bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). For the PNGase assay, protein extracts were incubated with 500 U N-glycosidase F (PNGase, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Solubilized proteins (20 μg) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. After transfer, blocked membranes were incubated with SAF61 primary antibody. Bound antibodies were revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). To standardize the results, membranes were rehybridized with an anti-α-tubulin antibody. The ratio between the truncated form of PrP (C1 fragment) and full-length PrP (Native) was evaluated by densitometric analyses using ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
Quantification of tryptophan hydroxylase activity
Determination of enzymatic functions was conducted on uninfected 1C115-HT cells, Fk-infected 1C115-HT cells and Rocki-Fk-1C115-HT cells. After two washings with cold PBS, cells were scraped and collected down by centrifugation (10,000g, 3 min, 4°C). Tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) activity was measured radioenzymatically as in [23]. Briefly, cell extracts were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in an assay mixture containing 200 mM Na acetate, pH 6.1, 1 mM ferrous sulfate, 2 mM 6-methyl-H4-pterin, 40 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM Na phosphate and 100 μM [3H]-L-tryptophan. TPH activity was determined by quantifying the production of [3H]2O in a liquid scintillation counter and expressed as pmol/30 min/mg of cell protein extract.
Determination of 5-HT, 5-HIAA and 5-HT oxidized products
The contents in 5-HT and related metabolites were measured by HPLC combined to electrochemical (EC) detection as described in [23].
Radioligand binding experiments
The presence of vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) sites was assessed through [3H]-tetrabenazine binding as in [23]. [3H]-paroxetine binding to functional 5-HT transporter (SERT) was carried out as in [33].
Phospho-Ser3-cofilin level and PrPSc deposition in the brains of prion-infected mice
Prion-infected (n = 3) and control uninfected (n = 6) mice were anaesthetized with ketamine (125 mg kg-1) and xylazine (17 mg kg-1) and perfused via cardiac aorta with 4% paraformaldehyde at 130 days after infection. The cerebellum was removed and cryoprotected in sucrose 30% before freezing in isopentane at -80°C. Transverse cryostat sections (30 μm-thick) were cut and submitted floating to classical immuno-peroxidase staining of PrPSc and phosphorylated cofilin using SAF32 (1 μg ml−1) and anti-phospho-Ser3-cofilin (2 μg ml−1; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) antibodies, respectively. The specificity of PrPSc immunodetection was achieved by denaturing the PrPC by incubation of the sections in proteinase K (10 μg ml−1) for 10 min at 37°C and subsequently in 3.4 M guanidine thiocyanate for 15 min. The PrP- and phospho-Ser3-cofilin-bound antibodies were visualized using biotinylated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), respectively, and the Vectastain Elite kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA).
ROCK inhibition
ROCK activity was inhibited with dimethylfasudil (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) or Y-27632 (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO, USA).
PrPres quantification
The amount of proteinase K–resistant PrP (PrPres) in infected cell lysates or brain extracts of 22L-infected mice infused or not with Y-27632 or dimethylfasudil were determined using a PrP-specific sandwich ELISA [24,63] after proteinase K digestion (10 μg ml−1) for 1 h at 37°C.
Sucrose gradient fractionation of cell membranes
TACE was detected by western blot analysis after sucrose gradient membrane fractionation of cell or cerebellar extracts performed under detergent-free conditions to isolate low buoyant fractions enriched in caveolin-1 proteins [24,64].
Measurement of PDK1 activity
PDK1 activity was measured in cell lysates or cerebellar extracts using a fluorescently labeled PDK1 substrate (5FAM-ARKRERTYSFGHHA-COOH, Caliper Life Sciences, Hanover, MD, USA) as reported in [24,64]. The relative amounts of substrate peptide and product phospho-peptide were determined using a Caliper EZ-reader (Caliper Life Sciences, Hanover, MD, USA).
ROCK immunosequestration
ROCK-I or ROCK-II immunosequestration was performed by cell bombardment with tungsten microprojectiles coated with antibody to ROCK-I or ROCK-II [24,64].
ROCK-I immunoprecipitation
ROCK-I immunoprecipitation was performed according to standard protocols by using protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Picataway, NJ, USA) coupled to anti-ROCK-I antibody and 100 μg of cell lysates or cerebellar extracts. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting using anti-ROCK-I and anti-PDK1 antibodies.
Cell metabolic labeling with [32P]-orthophosphate
[32P]-orthophosphate labeling was performed as in [65]. Briefly, the cell culture medium was removed and cells were thoroughly washed with phosphate-free DMEM to eliminate any residual phosphate-containing medium. [32P]-orthophosphate (40.7 Gbq mmol-1, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) was added to the cell culture at a final concentration of 18.5 Mbq ml-1. After 2 h, the labeling medium was removed and the cells were lyzed after extensive washing.
Cell transfection of S241A PDK1 mutant
Endogenously expressed wild type PDK1 was constitutively repressed in the 1C11 cell system (PDK1null-cells) upon cell transfection of a shRNA of the pdk1 gene [24] following the same procedure as in [15]. The mutated S241 PDK1 mutant was built by polymerase chain reaction and eight silent mutations were further introduced into the S241A pdk1 gene sequence corresponding to the siRNA hybridization zone [15]. The mutated S241 pdk1 gene was cloned into the pEBG-2T expression vector [66]. For expression of the S241A PDK1 mutant, PDK1null-cells were transfected with 10 μg of the pEBG-2T construct as in [67] and left to grown for 36 h. Reconstituted cells were then lyzed and assayed for PDK1 expression, PDK1 activity, PDK1 interaction with ROCK-I and PDK1 phosphorylation by ROCK-I after cell metabolic labeling with [32P]-orthophosphate.
Data analysis
An analysis of variance of the cell/animal response group was performed using Kaleidagraph software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Values are given as means ± s.e.m. Significant responses (P < 0.05) are marked by symbols (#,*,†,‡) and their corresponding P values are provided in figure legends. Survival times were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using a log-rank test for curve comparisons. When non-specified experiments were performed in three to five times in triplicates.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. Ferri A, Sanes JR, Coleman MP, Cunningham JM, Kato AC (2003) Inhibiting axon degeneration and synapse loss attenuates apoptosis and disease progression in a mouse model of motoneuron disease. Curr Biol 13: 669–673. 12699624
2. Gillingwater TH, Ingham CA, Coleman MP, Ribchester RR (2003) Ultrastructural correlates of synapse withdrawal at axotomized neuromuscular junctions in mutant and transgenic mice expressing the Wld gene. J Anat 203: 265–276. 14529044
3. Sievers C, Platt N, Perry VH, Coleman MP, Conforti L (2003) Neurites undergoing Wallerian degeneration show an apoptotic-like process with Annexin V positive staining and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. Neurosci Res 46: 161–169. 12767479
4. Brose N, O'Connor V, Skehel P (2010) Synaptopathy: dysfunction of synaptic function? Biochem Soc Trans 38: 443–444. doi: 10.1042/BST0380443 20298199
5. Aguzzi A, Baumann F, Bremer J (2008) The prion's elusive reason for being. Annu Rev Neurosci 31: 439–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125620 18558863
6. Brandner S, Isenmann S, Raeber A, Fischer M, Sailer A, et al. (1996) Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity. Nature 379: 339–343. 8552188
7. Mallucci G, Dickinson A, Linehan J, Klohn PC, Brandner S, et al. (2003) Depleting neuronal PrP in prion infection prevents disease and reverses spongiosis. Science 302: 871–874. 14593181
8. Chesebro B, Trifilo M, Race R, Meade-White K, Teng C, et al. (2005) Anchorless prion protein results in infectious amyloid disease without clinical scrapie. Science 308: 1435–1439. 15933194
9. Harris DA, True HL (2006) New insights into prion structure and toxicity. Neuron 50: 353–357. 16675391
10. Winklhofer KF, Tatzelt J, Haass C (2008) The two faces of protein misfolding: gain- and loss-of-function in neurodegenerative diseases. EMBO J 27: 336–349. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601930 18216876
11. Rambold AS, Muller V, Ron U, Ben-Tal N, Winklhofer KF, et al. (2008) Stress-protective signalling of prion protein is corrupted by scrapie prions. EMBO J 27: 1974–1984. Epub 2008 Jun 1919. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.122 18566584
12. Schneider B, Pietri M, Pradines E, Loubet D, Launay JM, et al. (2011) Understanding the neurospecificity of Prion protein signaling. Front Biosci 16: 169–186.
13. Linden R, Martins VR, Prado MA, Cammarota M, Izquierdo I, et al. (2008) Physiology of the prion protein. Physiol Rev 88: 673–728. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00007.2007 18391177
14. Alleaume-Butaux A, Dakowski C, Pietri M, Mouillet-Richard S, Launay JM, et al. (2013) Cellular prion protein is required for neuritogenesis: fine-tuning of multiple singaling pathways involved in focal adhesions and actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Cell Health and Cytoskeleton 5: 1–12.
15. Loubet D, Dakowski C, Pietri M, Pradines E, Bernard S, et al. (2012) Neuritogenesis: the prion protein controls beta1 integrin signaling activity. Faseb J 26: 678–690. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-185579 22038049
16. Graner E, Mercadante AF, Zanata SM, Forlenza OV, Cabral AL, et al. (2000) Cellular prion protein binds laminin and mediates neuritogenesis. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 76: 85–92. 10719218
17. Santuccione A, Sytnyk V, Leshchyns'ka I, Schachner M (2005) Prion protein recruits its neuronal receptor NCAM to lipid rafts to activate p59fyn and to enhance neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol 169: 341–354. 15851519
18. Lopes MH, Hajj GN, Muras AG, Mancini GL, Castro RM, et al. (2005) Interaction of cellular prion and stress-inducible protein 1 promotes neuritogenesis and neuroprotection by distinct signaling pathways. J Neurosci 25: 11330–11339. 16339028
19. Hajj GN, Santos TG, Cook ZS, Martins VR (2009) Developmental expression of prion protein and its ligands stress-inducible protein 1 and vitronectin. J Comp Neurol 517: 371–384. doi: 10.1002/cne.22157 19760599
20. Beraldo FH, Arantes CP, Santos TG, Queiroz NG, Young K, et al. (2010) Role of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in calcium signaling induced by prion protein interaction with stress-inducible protein 1. J Biol Chem 285: 36542–36550. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.157263 20837487
21. Beraldo FH, Arantes CP, Santos TG, Machado CF, Roffe M, et al. (2011) Metabotropic glutamate receptors transduce signals for neurite outgrowth after binding of the prion protein to laminin gamma1 chain. Faseb J 25: 265–279. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-161653 20876210
22. Mouillet-Richard S, Mutel V, Loric S, Tournois C, Launay JM, et al. (2000) Regulation by neurotransmitter receptors of serotonergic or catecholaminergic neuronal cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 275: 9186–9192. 10734054
23. Mouillet-Richard S, Nishida N, Pradines E, Laude H, Schneider B, et al. (2008) Prions impair bioaminergic functions through serotonin- or catecholamine-derived neurotoxins in neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 283: 23782–23790. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802433200 18617522
24. Pietri M, Dakowski C, Hannaoui S, Alleaume-Butaux A, Hernandez-Rapp J, et al. (2013) PDK1 decreases TACE-mediated alpha-secretase activity and promotes disease progression in prion and Alzheimer's diseases. Nat Med 19: 1124–1131. doi: 10.1038/nm.3302 23955714
25. Paquet S, Langevin C, Chapuis J, Jackson GS, Laude H, et al. (2007) Efficient dissemination of prions through preferential transmission to nearby cells. J Gen Virol 88: 706–713. 17251590
26. Bernard O (2007) Lim kinases, regulators of actin dynamics. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 1071–1076. 17188549
27. Endo M, Ohashi K, Sasaki Y, Goshima Y, Niwa R, et al. (2003) Control of growth cone motility and morphology by LIM kinase and Slingshot via phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of cofilin. J Neurosci 23: 2527–2537. 12684437
28. Ng J, Luo L (2004) Rho GTPases regulate axon growth through convergent and divergent signaling pathways. Neuron 44: 779–793. 15572110
29. Riento K, Ridley AJ (2003) Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 446–456. 12778124
30. Mueller BK, Mack H, Teusch N (2005) Rho kinase, a promising drug target for neurological disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4: 387–398. 15864268
31. Olson MF (2008) Applications for ROCK kinase inhibition. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.002 18282695
32. Stankiewicz TR, Linseman DA (2014) Rho family GTPases: key players in neuronal development, neuronal survival, and neurodegeneration. Front Cell Neurosci 8: 314. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00314 25339865
33. Launay JM, Schneider B, Loric S, Da Prada M, Kellermann O (2006) Serotonin transport and serotonin transporter-mediated antidepressant recognition are controlled by 5-HT2B receptor signaling in serotonergic neuronal cells. FASEB J 20: 1843–1854. 16940156
34. Peyrin JM, Deleglise B, Saias L, Vignes M, Gougis P, et al. (2011) Axon diodes for the reconstruction of oriented neuronal networks in microfluidic chambers. Lab Chip 11: 3663–3673. doi: 10.1039/c1lc20014c 21922081
35. Deleglise B, Lassus B, Soubeyre V, Alleaume-Butaux A, Hjorth JJ, et al. (2013) Synapto-protective drugs evaluation in reconstructed neuronal network. PLoS One 8: e71103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071103 23976987
36. Deleglise B, Magnifico S, Duplus E, Vaur P, Soubeyre V, et al. (2014) ss-amyloid induces a dying-back process and remote trans-synaptic alterations in a microfluidic-based reconstructed neuronal network. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2: 145. doi: 10.1186/s40478-014-0145-3 25253021
37. Cronier S, Laude H, Peyrin JM (2004) Prions can infect primary cultured neurons and astrocytes and promote neuronal cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 12271–12276. 15302929
38. Cronier S, Beringue V, Bellon A, Peyrin JM, Laude H (2007) Prion strain- and species-dependent effects of antiprion molecules in primary neuronal cultures. J Virol 81: 13794–13800. 17913812
39. Westergard L, Turnbaugh JA, Harris DA (2011) A naturally occurring, C-terminal fragment of the prion protein delays disease and acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of PrPSc formation. J Biol Chem 286: 44234–44242. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.286195 22025612
40. Mouillet-Richard S, Ermonval M, Chebassier C, Laplanche JL, Lehmann S, et al. (2000) Signal transduction through prion protein. Science 289: 1925–1928. 10988071
41. Calleja V, Laguerre M, de Las Heras-Martinez G, Parker PJ, Requejo-Isidro J, et al. (2014) Acute regulation of PDK1 by a complex interplay of molecular switches. Biochem Soc Trans 42: 1435–1440. doi: 10.1042/BST20140222 25233428
42. Gao X, Harris TK (2006) Role of the PH domain in regulating in vitro autophosphorylation events required for reconstitution of PDK1 catalytic activity. Bioorg Chem 34: 200–223. 16780920
43. Li Y, Yang KJ, Park J (2010) Multiple implications of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 in human cancer. World J Biol Chem 1: 239–247. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v1.i8.239 21537480
44. Vidal C, Herzog C, Haeberle AM, Bombarde C, Miquel MC, et al. (2009) Early dysfunction of central 5-HT system in a murine model of bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Neuroscience 160: 731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.02.072 19285121
45. Da Silva JS, Medina M, Zuliani C, Di Nardo A, Witke W, et al. (2003) RhoA/ROCK regulation of neuritogenesis via profilin IIa-mediated control of actin stability. J Cell Biol 162: 1267–1279. 14517206
46. Bramham CR (2007) Control of synaptic consolidation in the dentate gyrus: mechanisms, functions, and therapeutic implications. Prog Brain Res 163: 453–471. 17765733
47. Kim S, Coulombe PA (2010) Emerging role for the cytoskeleton as an organizer and regulator of translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 75–81. doi: 10.1038/nrm2818 20027187
48. Jung H, Yoon BC, Holt CE (2012) Axonal mRNA localization and local protein synthesis in nervous system assembly, maintenance and repair. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 308–324. doi: 10.1038/nrn3210 22498899
49. Howe JG, Hershey JW (1984) Translational initiation factor and ribosome association with the cytoskeletal framework fraction from HeLa cells. Cell 37: 85–93. 6722878
50. Heuijerjans JH, Pieper FR, Ramaekers FC, Timmermans LJ, Kuijpers H, et al. (1989) Association of mRNA and eIF-2 alpha with the cytoskeleton in cells lacking vimentin. Exp Cell Res 181: 317–330. 2466674
51. Baudry A, Mouillet-Richard S, Schneider B, Launay JM, Kellermann O (2010) miR-16 targets the serotonin transporter: a new facet for adaptive responses to antidepressants. Science 329: 1537–1541. doi: 10.1126/science.1193692 20847275
52. Moreno JA, Radford H, Peretti D, Steinert JR, Verity N, et al. (2012) Sustained translational repression by eIF2alpha-P mediates prion neurodegeneration. Nature 485: 507–511. doi: 10.1038/nature11058 22622579
53. Gibson CL, Srivastava K, Sprigg N, Bath PM, Bayraktutan U (2014) Inhibition of Rho-kinase protects cerebral barrier from ischaemia-evoked injury through modulations of endothelial cell oxidative stress and tight junctions. J Neurochem 129: 816–826. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12681 24528233
54. Guo R, Liu B, Zhou S, Zhang B, Xu Y (2013) The protective effect of fasudil on the structure and function of cardiac mitochondria from rats with type 2 diabetes induced by streptozotocin with a high-fat diet is mediated by the attenuation of oxidative stress. Biomed Res Int 2013: 430791. doi: 10.1155/2013/430791 23762845
55. Zhou Y, Su Y, Li B, Liu F, Ryder JW, et al. (2003) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 by inhibiting Rho. Science 302: 1215–1217. 14615541
56. Rodriguez-Perez AI, Dominguez-Meijide A, Lanciego JL, Guerra MJ, Labandeira-Garcia JL (2013) Inhibition of Rho kinase mediates the neuroprotective effects of estrogen in the MPTP model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 58: 209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.06.004 23774254
57. Labandeira-Garcia JL, Rodriguez-Perez AI, Villar-Cheda B, Borrajo A, Dominguez-Meijide A, et al. (2014) Rho Kinase and Dopaminergic Degeneration: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Parkinson's Disease. Neuroscientist.
58. Herskowitz JH, Feng Y, Mattheyses AL, Hales CM, Higginbotham LA, et al. (2013) Pharmacologic inhibition of ROCK2 suppresses amyloid-beta production in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. J Neurosci 33: 19086–19098. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2508-13.2013 24305806
59. Pietri M, Caprini A, Mouillet-Richard S, Pradines E, Ermonval M, et al. (2006) Overstimulation of PrPC signaling pathways by prion peptide 106–126 causes oxidative injury of bioaminergic neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 281: 28470–28479. 16864581
60. Lenter M, Uhlig H, Hamann A, Jeno P, Imhof B, et al. (1993) A monoclonal antibody against an activation epitope on mouse integrin chain beta 1 blocks adhesion of lymphocytes to the endothelial integrin alpha 6 beta 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 9051–9055. 7692444
61. Kempster S, Bate C, Williams A (2007) Simvastatin treatment prolongs the survival of scrapie-infected mice. Neuroreport 18: 479–482. 17496807
62. McCabe A, Dolled-Filhart M, Camp RL, Rimm DL (2005) Automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of in situ protein expression, antibody concentration, and prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 1808–1815. 16368942
63. Bate C, Langeveld J, Williams A (2004) Manipulation of PrPres production in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells. J Neurosci Methods 138: 217–223. 15325130
64. Hofler A, Nichols T, Grant S, Lingardo L, Esposito EA, et al. (2011) Study of the PDK1/AKT signaling pathway using selective PDK1 inhibitors, HCS, and enhanced biochemical assays. Anal Biochem 414: 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.03.013 21402045
65. Moore DD, Sefton BM (1997) Analysis of protein phosphorylation. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (J Wiley & Sons, Inc).
66. Alessi DR, Deak M, Casamayor A, Caudwell FB, Morrice N, et al. (1997) 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1): structural and functional homology with the Drosophila DSTPK61 kinase. Curr Biol 7: 776–789. 9368760
67. Alessi DR, Andjelkovic M, Caudwell B, Cron P, Morrice N, et al. (1996) Mechanism of activation of protein kinase B by insulin and IGF-1. Embo J 15: 6541–6551. 8978681
68. Yadavalli R, Guttmann RP, Seward T, Centers AP, Williamson RA, et al. (2004) Calpain-dependent endoproteolytic cleavage of PrPSc modulates scrapie prion replication. J Biol Chem 279: 21948–56. 15026410
69. Mays CE, Kim C, Haldiman T, van der Merwe J, Lau A, et al. (2014) Prion disease tempo determined by host-dependent substrate reduction. J Clin Invest 124: 847–58. doi: 10.1172/JCI72241 24430187
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2015 Číslo 8
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Human Non-neutralizing HIV-1 Envelope Monoclonal Antibodies Limit the Number of Founder Viruses during SHIV Mucosal Infection in Rhesus Macaques
- Type VI Secretion System Toxins Horizontally Shared between Marine Bacteria
- Are Human Intestinal Eukaryotes Beneficial or Commensals?
- Illuminating Targets of Bacterial Secretion