Loss of hepatocyte cell division leads to liver inflammation and fibrosis
Authors:
Matthew R. Dewhurst aff001; Jin Rong Ow aff001; Gözde Zafer aff001; Noémi K. M. van Hul aff001; Heike Wollmann aff001; Xavier Bisteau aff001; David Brough aff002; Hyungwon Choi aff001; Philipp Kaldis aff001
Authors place of work:
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore
aff001; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester...
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation; and Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M
aff002; Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
aff003; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
aff004; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Sweden
aff005
Published in the journal:
Loss of hepatocyte cell division leads to liver inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS Genet 16(11): e1009084. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009084
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009084
Summary
The liver possesses a remarkable regenerative capacity based partly on the ability of hepatocytes to re-enter the cell cycle and divide to replace damaged cells. This capability is substantially reduced upon chronic damage, but it is not clear if this is a cause or consequence of liver disease. Here, we investigate whether blocking hepatocyte division using two different mouse models affects physiology as well as clinical liver manifestations like fibrosis and inflammation. We find that in P14 Cdk1Liv-/- mice, where the division of hepatocytes is abolished, polyploidy, DNA damage, and increased p53 signaling are prevalent. Cdk1Liv-/- mice display classical markers of liver damage two weeks after birth, including elevated ALT, ALP, and bilirubin levels, despite the lack of exogenous liver injury. Inflammation was further studied using cytokine arrays, unveiling elevated levels of CCL2, TIMP1, CXCL10, and IL1-Rn in Cdk1Liv-/- liver, which resulted in increased numbers of monocytes. Ablation of CDK2-dependent DNA re-replication and polyploidy in Cdk1Liv-/- mice reversed most of these phenotypes. Overall, our data indicate that blocking hepatocyte division induces biological processes driving the onset of the disease phenotype. It suggests that the decrease in hepatocyte division observed in liver disease may not only be a consequence of fibrosis and inflammation, but also a pathological cue.
Keywords:
Cell cycle and cell division – DNA damage – Fatty liver – Hepatocytes – Mouse models – Polyploidy
Introduction
The liver, besides being the metabolic center, is also the main organ responsible for neutralizing toxic substances in the body, which results in functional parenchymal hepatocytes being constantly exposed to toxins that can induce cell death. To alleviate this, the liver exhibits an impressive ability to repair itself, a feat accomplished by the re-entry of fully differentiated hepatocytes into the cell cycle [1]. A study in rats estimated that 0.2% to 0.5% of hepatocytes undergo cell division at any one point of time to maintain homeostatic regeneration in normal adult non-diseased liver [2].
It is well-established that the ability of hepatocytes to undergo cell division upon induction of liver regeneration is impaired in models of severe liver disease [3–5]. This can be a result of replicative senescence caused by the continual cycling of hepatocytes upon chronic liver damage driven by lysophosphatidylcholine-mediated lipotoxicity [6] as is the case for hepatic steatosis, or inflammatory cytotoxicity induced by viral hepatitis [7, 8]. Notably, this is evidenced by shortened telomeres and increased senescence markers in the liver of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cirrhosis [9–11]. Alternatively, oxidative stress can also trigger the DNA damage checkpoint to inhibit proliferation and promote polyploidization in hepatocytes, a phenotype also seen in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [12].
Progression through the different phases of the cell cycle is regulated by the activity of a family of kinases known as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), named as such for the pre-requisite interaction with another family of proteins called cyclins in order to be functional [13]. CDK1, the first CDK to be identified, was initially discovered as part of the maturation-promoting factor that was crucial and sufficient for inducing mitosis [14]. The importance of CDK1 in driving mitosis, and more generally, cell proliferation, is exemplified by the observation that inhibition of CDK1 activity arrests cells in the G2 phase and prevents cell division [15, 16]. Accordingly, constitutive genetic ablation of Cdk1 results in embryonic lethality [17]. On the other hand, CDK2, a paralog of CDK1, despite being responsible for promoting DNA replication in S phase [18], is not essential for viability because of functional compensation by CDK1 [19, 20] and CDK4. Both CDK1 and CDK2 partner with cyclin A2 (Ccna2) and cyclin B to reach full activity during S phase and mitosis.
Hepatocytes can exhibit an altered cell division process whereby mitosis occurs without the completion of cytokinesis, leading to the formation of binuclear polyploid cells [21]. This happens physiologically downstream of the insulin signaling pathway [22] and may serve to protect against loss of tumor suppressors upon genomic aberrations induced by a nutrient-rich environment [23, 24]. Interestingly, polyploidization involving mononuclear polyploid cells that do not complete mitosis, termed “pathological polyploidization”, has been observed in diseased liver of viral hepatitis and NAFLD patients [12, 25], implicating pathological polyploidization as a possible etiological factor in liver disease.
We and others have shown that genetically blocking cell cycle progression in hepatocytes without the exogenous induction of liver damage can, by itself, result in increased nuclear and cell diameter that is dependent on the state of ploidy [15, 26–29]. In particular, ablation of Cdk1 specifically in the liver using Albumin-Cre (Cdk1Liv-/-) resulted in increased CDK2 activity leading to DNA re-replication and polyploidy [15]. Nevertheless, little else is known about the impact of this change in the hepatocyte phenotype on liver physiology and function.
Here, we aim to understand the implications of blocking hepatocyte cell division on liver physiology. Utilizing Cdk1Liv-/- and Ccna2Liv-/- mice as models of impaired hepatocyte proliferation, we observe the development of inflammation and fibrosis despite the lack of any treatment to promote liver damage. Furthermore, we show that this might be due to polyploidy, as concurrent loss of Cdk2 leads to the absence of polyploidy reverting the phenotype. Thus, we provide evidence that the loss of hepatocyte proliferation in liver disease may not only be the outcome, but could also be an etiology of liver pathology.
Results
Liver-specific deletion of Cdk1 begins embryonically and is complete by P14
“Pathological” polyploidy is often observed in liver diseases like NAFLD and NASH [12]. Since inhibition or loss of Cdk1 is known to induce polyploidy [15], we used mouse models with a hepatocyte-specific deletion of Cdk1 (Cdk1Liv-/-) or Ccna2 (cyclin A2, see Fig 6). Hepatocytes undergo rapid mitotic division during early postnatal growth, however, upon maturation and terminal differentiation, readily quiesce [30]. To confirm Cdk1 deletion and the loss of CDK1 protein, we chose two developmental windows when hepatic cells are actively undergoing division in which to observe Cdk1 expression levels in Cdk1Liv-/- animals–embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) and postnatal day 14 (P14).
We isolated hepatoblasts from E14.5 embryos and hepatocytes from P14 pups for analysis of mRNA and protein expression from Cdk1Liv-/- and wild type (WT). In E14.5 Cdk1Liv-/- hepatoblasts, Cdk1 mRNA expression was reduced by 40% in comparison to WT, whereas in P14 hepatocytes, Cdk1 mRNA expression could hardly be detected (Fig 1A). In situ hybridization for exon 3 of Cdk1 mRNA, which is the region on the Cdk1FLOX allele [15] removed by Cre recombinase activity, resulted in intense staining in WT P14 hepatocytes, while staining in Cdk1Liv-/- liver was restricted to interstitial cells, leaving hepatocytes unstained (Fig 1B). Western blotting unveiled that the CDK1 protein was expressed in WT E14.5 hepatoblasts and P14 hepatocytes (Fig 1C). We were able to detect a 40% reduction in CDK1 protein levels in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatoblasts compared to WT (Fig 1D). At P14, CDK1 protein could not be detected in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, suggesting that Cdk1 was completely deleted by this stage. In summary, Albumin-Cre leads to partial deletion of Cdk1 in embryonic hepatoblasts and complete deletion in hepatocytes two weeks after birth.
Deletion of Cdk1 prevents hepatocyte mitotic division
CDK1 drives mitosis in eukaryotic cells and is an essential gene in the mouse [15, 17]. To determine whether deletion of Cdk1 was indeed impairing hepatocyte mitotic division in vivo at P14, liver sections were stained for phospho-serine 10 on histone H3 (H3pS10), a classical marker of mitosis [31]. Only background staining of H3pS10 was observed in Cdk1Liv-/- livers compared to WT livers (Fig 1E and 1F), indicating that deletion of Cdk1 was preventing P14 hepatocytes from undergoing mitotic division, similar as we have shown in adult hepatocytes [32].
Loss of cell division induces hepatocyte hypertrophy and polyploidy
Since Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes are unable to divide, it was surprising to observe that these animals developed a seemingly functional liver. To elucidate possible mechanisms by which mitotically impaired hepatocytes could still maintain liver growth, we performed histopathological analyses of liver sections. A significant enlargement of hepatocyte nuclei and an increase in hepatocyte size was observed during postnatal development (Fig 1G and 1H), which was consistent with previous literature [15]. In addition, the liver to body weight ratio was slightly but consistently increased in Cdk1Liv-/- mice (Fig 1I). Overall, these results indicate that despite hepatocytes being unable to divide in Cdk1Liv-/- mice, they do develop a liver that is at least as large as WT mice.
It was previously reported that mitotically-impaired fibroblasts undergo cycles of complete DNA re-replication to generate polyploid cells [15]. FACS analysis of propidium iodide stained hepatocytes isolated from P14 animals was performed to determine whether a similar mechanism was occurring during early postnatal growth. WT hepatocytes were mostly diploid [80%] but a minority was polyploid [20%] (Fig 2A). Hepatocytes isolated from P14 Cdk1Liv-/- animals displayed an abnormal pattern of DNA content with only ≈30% being diploid and the rest being polyploid compared to wild type (Fig 2A). Notably, we observed more mononuclear polyploid hepatocytes in Cdk1Liv-/- than WT liver, and correspondingly, less binuclear hepatocytes (Fig 2B), indicating an overall increase in mononuclear polyploid hepatocytes due to a block in nuclear division [32]. To understand the increase in polyploidy, we stained liver sections for PCNA, a marker of DNA replication [33]. At P14 and P28, approximately 70–80% of the hepatocytes were positive for PCNA in both WT and Cdk1Liv-/- (Fig 2C and 2D). In WT, hepatocytes ceased to replicate their DNA around P42-56 with less than 10% positive PCNA cells since most adult hepatocytes become quiescent at that stage. In contrast, Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes maintained a high level of PCNA staining with approximately 80% positive for P42, and approximately 50% positive for PCNA at P56. This would suggest that Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes might either continue to replicate DNA after control hepatocytes had entered into a quiescent state, or remain arrested in S phase unable to exit the cell cycle in the absence of CDK1. Given that cell size and DNA content are positively correlated [34], our data suggest that polyploidy-induced hypertrophy of hepatocytes drives postnatal liver growth in the absence of CDK1, which is in agreement to what we have reported for liver regeneration [32].
It has previously been shown that DNA re-replication and polyploidy can lead to a DNA damage response [35]. γH2AX foci, as a marker for DNA damage, could hardly been detected in WT P56 liver sections (Fig 2E) and were completely absent at P14. On the other hand, in P56 Cdk1Liv-/- liver sections, there was a four-fold increase in γH2AX foci compared to WT (Fig 2F) with a corresponding increase in the percentage of γH2AX+ cells (Fig 2G). In addition, phosphorylated CHK1 at serine 345 (CHK1 pS345), a marker of DNA damage response [36], was increased in Cdk1Liv-/- liver (Fig 2H and 2I). The expression of p21Cdkn1a was found to be increased at both the mRNA (Fig 2J) and protein level (Fig 2H and 2K) in P56 Cdk1Liv-/- compared to wild type liver, likely caused by increased p53 activity as evident by a higher level of phosphorylation on serine15 [37] (p53 pS15; Fig 2H and 2L).
Sustained activation of p53 can lead to induction of apoptosis [38]. In isolated Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, we detected increased expression of pro-apoptotic genes Bcl2l11 and Bbc3 (S1A Fig), commonly known as Bim and Puma, respectively, both of which are established p53 targets [39–41]. Furthermore, through mitochondria-cytoplasm fractionation, we identified elevated levels of cytoplasmic cytochrome c (CYC) in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes (S1B and S1C Fig), suggesting there was increased release of mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, a key event in the apoptosis pathway [42]. In addition, there was an increased sub-G1 population of cells when we analysed our flow cytometry data (S1D Fig). Taken together, our data suggest that in proliferation-defective hepatocytes lacking CDK1, DNA damage (γH2AX) was induced, which triggered a DNA damage response through activation of p53, resulting in the increased incidence of apoptosis and other phenotypes (see below).
Liver specific deletion of Cdk1 promotes inflammation and liver damage
Despite Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes maintaining control of the liver-to-body weight ratio (Fig 1I), markers of hepatocyte damage were observed (Fig 2). Therefore, we aimed to analyse the physiological parameters of these mice. In WT mice, ALT (blood alanine transaminase) and bilirubin levels were constant (Fig 3A and 3B), whereas ALP (alkaline phosphatase) levels decreased from 500 U/L at P14 to 150 U/L at P56 (Fig 3C). In Cdk1Liv-/- liver, ALT was already elevated at P14 and was four-fold higher after P28 (Fig 3A). Bilirubin and ALP levels were increased at least two-fold at P14 in Cdk1Liv-/- compared to WT, but at later time points, Cdk1Liv-/- and WT were similar (Fig 3B and 3C). These data indicated that there was initial injury at P14, which seemed to affect ALT at the later time points. Although this could be a result of DNA damage (see Fig 2), one could envision alternative causes too.
To understand the cause of liver damage, we performed transcriptomic analysis of isolated hepatocytes and whole liver from WT and Cdk1Liv-/- mice at P14. We detected transcripts from 21,066 genes, of which 341 and 74 were respectively up-regulated and down-regulated in Cdk1Liv-/- isolated hepatocytes. 392 and 59 were respectively up-regulated and down-regulated in Cdk1Liv-/- whole liver when compared to WT (S1 Table). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the data indicated that the samples could generally be clustered according to CDK1 status and whether the sample was isolated hepatocytes or whole liver. Loss of CDK1 led to a shift of both isolated hepatocyte and whole liver samples along the PC2 axis in the same direction, suggesting that the change in transcriptomics upon Cdk1 knockout was generally the same between hepatocytes and whole liver (Fig 3D). Globally, the majority of the genes remained expressed at the same levels in both Cdk1Liv-/- and WT, indicating that only a minority of genes were significantly altered in the Cdk1Liv-/- mice (Fig 3E). Gene ontology analysis was performed for differentially expressed genes (S2 Table), and genes up-regulated in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes were enriched for gene ontology terms associated with “mitotic nuclear division” and “cell cycle” (Fig 3F Cluster 4, S2 Fig). A closer look at genes involved in cell cycle regulation indicated that a majority of these genes were up-regulated in hepatocytes and to a lesser extent in the whole liver (Fig 3G, S3 Fig). As we observed a greater number of polyploid Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes (Fig 2A), which might be caused by reduced cytokinesis [21], we also inspected for any changes in cytokinesis-associated genes. Similar to what was detected for other cell cycle-associated genes, the expressions of a number of cytokinesis-associated genes such as Anln, Plk1, and Racgap1 were increased (S4 Fig). Notably, many cell cycle-related terms are enriched for genes up-regulated in Cdk1Liv-/- whole liver as well (Fig 3F, S2 Fig), possibly because hepatocytes comprise up to 70% of all hepatic cells [43].
The enrichment of gene ontology terms such as “cellular response to DNA damage stimulus” (Fig 3F Cluster 2, S2 Fig) and “response to ionizing radiation” for up-regulated genes (Fig 3F Cluster 6, S2 Fig), coupled to the increase of many DNA damage response genes (Fig 3H, S5 Fig), implied involvement of DNA damage and p53 signalling in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes (see Fig 2H–2K). On the other hand, down-regulated genes were enriched for gene ontologies involved in “oxidation-reduction process” and “ATP biosynthetic process” (Fig 3F Cluster 7, S2 Fig), supporting our previous observation that Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes are defective in oxidative phosphorylation [32]. Down-regulated genes were also enriched for “lipid metabolism” and “fatty acid oxidation” (Fig 3F Cluster 5, S2 Fig), which will be the focus of future studies.
Chronic liver injury is often accompanied by pronounced hepatic inflammation and activation of the tissue resident macrophage population (Kupffer cells) [44]. The over-representation of genes involved in gene ontologies such as “inflammatory response” (Fig 3F Cluster 1, S2 Fig), “positive regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB signalling” (Fig 3F Cluster 2) and “response to cytokine” (Fig 3F Cluster 3) indicated that there might be increased inflammation in the liver of Cdk1Liv-/- mice. To detect inflammation and activated Kupffer cells, liver sections were stained for F4/80, a classical marker of macrophages [45]. In WT liver sections, individual F4/80+ cells were scattered throughout the parenchyma at P14 and there was a 4-fold reduction at P28, remaining at low levels from then on (Fig 4A and 4B). The presence of large amounts of F4/80+ cells at this time point is possibly because monocytes and macrophages were in the expansion phase prior to establishing the resident Kupffer cell population during this developmental window [46]. In the Cdk1Liv-/- liver sections, the number of F4/80+ cells was similar to WT at P14. In contrast to the reduction in F4/80+ staining in WT at P28-P56 when the Kupffer cells exited the expansion phase, aggregated foci and elevated numbers of Kupffer cells were observed in Cdk1Liv-/- livers, which remained high at approximately 5% compared to 2% seen in WT livers at P14. These data indicate the presence of an inflammatory trigger in the Cdk1Liv-/- liver from P28 onwards that maintains the F4/80+ cells in an active state.
An early indicator of chronic liver damage is the aberrant deposition of extracellular matrix resulting in fibrosis [47]. Analysis of RNAseq data for a gene signature of fibrosis [48] revealed increased expression of many of these genes (S6 Fig). A number of markers for fibrosis which were increased in the RNAseq at P14, such as Col1a2, Pdgfra, and Tgfb2, were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) (Fig 4C), hinting at the presence of fibrosis in Cdk1Liv-/- liver. To investigate fibrosis, liver sections were stained with Sirius Red to detect collagen deposition, a major component of extracellular matrix. In WT, the levels of collagen and, therefore, fibrosis was low at all time points measured and was restricted to the periportal and pericentral areas as expected (Fig 4D). In contrast, Sirius Red staining remained elevated, with periportal and pericentral staining approximately 5-fold higher than in WT, and a general increase in parenchymal staining suggesting classic bridging formation between periportal regions (Fig 4E). This indicated that loss of CDK1 in the liver resulted in elevated levels of fibrosis in the absence of external insults as early as P14.
Chemokine levels in the liver and hepatocytes
Cells with DNA damage secrete a complex secretome that modulates both the immune cell milieu as well as the surrounding microenvironment [49]. To analyse this proinflammatory effect further, we screened our RNAseq data for inflammatory genes that were differentially expressed between WT and Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes and whole liver. As expected, many cytokines and inflammatory-related genes were up-regulated in the liver of Cdk1Liv-/- (Fig 5A). To further explore how this translated into a difference in the secretome, a cytokine protein array was performed on whole liver lysates. We detected elevated levels of CCL2, CXCL10, IL-1Rn, and TIMP1 as well as decreased levels of CXCL12 in Cdk1Liv-/- livers compared to WT livers (Fig 5B), which were also the most differentially regulated in the whole liver transcriptomics (Fig 5C). Notably, Ccl2, Timp1, Cxcl10, and Il1rn mRNA levels were also increased in isolated Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, suggesting a contributory role of Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes to the immune response.
CCL2 is a chemokine that promotes emigration of monocytes from the bone marrow into the circulation and their recruitment to sites of inflammation [50, 51]. Parallel to the rise in CCL2 levels, we detected a specific increase in circulating monocytes in the blood (Fig 5D), but not lymphocytes or neutrophils (Fig 5E). Elevated monocyte infiltration into the liver induced by CCL2 might, in part, explain the increase of F4/80+ cells (see Fig 4A and 4B).
CCL2 expression can be directly driven by NFκB, with the p65 subunit binding to the promoter of the Ccl2 gene [52]. Since p65 can be phosphorylated at Ser 536 downstream of active p53 to promote NFκB-dependent transcription [53], we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to test whether there was greater binding of p65 to the Ccl2 promoter. Indeed, in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, there was greater localization of NFκB p65 phosphorylated at serine 536 (NFκB p65 pS536) at the Ccl2 promoter (Fig 5F). This suggests that the increase in CCL2 might be due to enhanced NFκB signaling, which might in turn be activated by greater p53 activity (Fig 2). In support, “I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB signalling” (Fig 3F Cluster 2) appears as an enriched gene ontology for up-regulated genes in not only whole liver transcriptomics, but also in isolated hepatocytes (Fig 3F).
To ensure that the phenotype we described is not only observed in Cdk1Liv-/- mice, we checked for fibrosis in a different mouse model of impaired hepatocyte proliferation, the Ccna2Liv-/- mice, in which Ccna2 (cyclin A2), an activator of CDK activity, is deleted specifically in hepatocytes using Albumin-Cre. We had previously reported that knocking out Ccna2 in the liver impairs proliferation of hepatic cells [54]. As seen in Cdk1Liv-/- liver, Ccna2Liv-/- hepatocytes exhibit increased size (Fig 6A and 6B), although the magnitude of size increase was not as much as Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes with the increase occurring slower and later in post-natal development. This is supported by flow cytometry analysis of DNA content in isolated hepatocytes (Fig 6C), which revealed significantly reduced percentage of cells with 2C content and greater percentage of cells >2C content. Unexpectedly, unlike Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, which exhibited distinct peaks that likely correspond to complete genome replication albeit being in a polyploid state, Ccna2Liv-/- hepatocytes exhibit a DNA content profile resembling aneuploidy exacerbated by DNA re-replication. This might be due to the importance of cyclin A2 in maintaining DNA integrity during DNA replication and chromosome segregation [55]. Nevertheless, obvious areas of immune infiltration were also observed in H&E sections (Fig 6A, arrows), and when we probed sections of Ccna2Liv-/- liver for fibrosis, we noted increased fibrosis from P42 onwards (Fig 6D and 6E). This hints at the presence of liver injury in Ccna2Liv-/- mice even though no exogenous liver injury was applied and suggests that the inflammatory and fibrotic phenotype observed in Cdk1Liv-/- liver may be relevant in other cases where hepatocyte proliferation is impaired.
Blocking DNA replication prevents inflammatory and fibrotic phenotype
Hepatocytes are one of the rare differentiated cell types that exist as diploid as well as polyploid, but under normal conditions, polyploid cells are largely binuclear and the degree of polyploidy rarely exceeds 8C [56]. In contrast, in liver diseases like NAFLD and NASH, it was observed that the percentage of mononuclear polyploid cells and the degree of polyploidy is significantly increased, fueling the hypothesis that “pathological” polyploidy may be a driver of the disease [12]. In addition, polyploidy has been suggested to trigger a DNA damage response [57]. To understand whether “pathological” polyploidy contributes to the phenotypes observed in Cdk1Liv-/- liver, we wanted to prevent DNA re-replication by removing the Cdk2 gene in Cdk1Liv-/- mice, creating compound knockout (DKO) mice. DKO mice were not born at Mendelian ratio in a Cdk1-null background (S3 Table). Nevertheless, we did not observe perinatal lethality, suggesting that embryonic lethality was a likely cause of DKO pups being born at lower-than-expected ratio. Fortunately, this phenotype was not completely penetrant and despite the loss of both CDK1 and CDK2 in the hepatocytes (Fig 7A), we were able to obtain DKO mice that survived, albeit with a lower liver to body weight ratio (Fig 7B).
Hepatocytes isolated from the DKO mouse did not exhibit polyploidy (Fig 7C, S7 Fig), confirming that CDK2 is indeed driving DNA re-replication in the Cdk1Liv-/- liver in vivo as has been shown for MEFs in vitro [15]. While the level of ploidy in the Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes at P14 is not as high as in adult mice (see Fig 2), we ascribe this mostly to a difference in the genetic background and age of these mice. Nevertheless, Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes displayed a trend towards increased ploidy level, as seen by the higher 4C and the presence of 8C and 16C peaks indicated by arrows, with a correspondingly lower 2C peak even though equal numbers of cells were assessed and by P56, they exhibit the same phenotype as described earlier (see Fig 4). Interestingly, the size of DKO hepatocytes were larger than WT but not as large as Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes (Fig 7D-E), supporting the idea that hypertrophy upon loss of hepatocyte division is partly dependent on polyploidy. Immunohistochemical staining for F4/80 as well as Sirius Red staining for fibrosis revealed reduced immune infiltration (Fig 7F) and fibrosis (Fig 7G) in DKO liver compared to Cdk1Liv-/-. When we probed the lysates of P14 isolated hepatocytes for markers of DNA damage (Fig 7H), we observed increased phosphorylation of CHK1 and p53 (Fig 7I and 7J) in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes, confirming what we described in P56 whole liver lysates (Fig 2) and implicating that DNA damage occurs as early as P14. In addition, we also noted that CHK1 and p53 phosphorylation was reduced in DKO hepatocytes to approximately the same level as WT hepatocytes (Fig 7I and 7J). Correspondingly, mRNA expression of Cdkn1a was also decreased back to WT levels in the absence of CDK2 (Fig 7K). This suggests that polyploidy or CDK2 itself has direct implications in promoting the DNA damage response, which in turn triggers the inflammatory phenotype observed in the liver of Cdk1Liv-/- mice.
Overall, our data indicate that inhibiting hepatocyte division by deleting Cdk1 or Ccna2 right after birth leads to polyploidy that causes DNA damage early in development, which eventually results in inflammation that the damaged liver cannot resolve.
Discussion
The ability of differentiated hepatocytes to re-enter the cell cycle is unique and is not only important for liver regeneration during acute injury (e.g. partial hepatectomy) but may also play a role in response to chronic injury. Here, it was our aim to investigate whether ablation of the hepatocyte self-renewal capacity would have any immediate consequences. Therefore, we focused on the analysis of liver two weeks after birth, a time point at which hepatocytes were still actively dividing, to understand the phenotypic changes in the absence of exogenous liver injury. A side effect of our approach of deleting the Cdk1 gene was that Cdk1-deficient livers have significantly enlarged hepatocytes which is accompanied by increased polyploidy as we have described before [15, 32]. Therefore, we were also able to investigate the role of “pathological” hepatocyte polyploidy, which has been previously observed in liver disease. Finally, we were able to prevent the development of polyploidy by ablating CDK2 in the Cdk1Liv-/- background (Fig 7C), which rescued the inflammation (Fig 7F) and decreased fibrosis (Fig 7G) in the double knockout liver (Cdk1Liv-/-Cdk2-/-).
Polyploidy occurs in normal human liver, with a majority of hepatocytes being binuclear tetraploids [56]. Physiologic polyploidy has been suggested to provide protection against genotoxic stress [58] and oncogenic loss of heterozygosity [23]. However, excessive polyploidy (>8C) and mononuclear polyploidy is increased in many cases of liver disease such as NAFLD/NASH [12] and viral hepatitis [25]. In our study, we have found that G2 phase-arrested Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes undergo multiple rounds of DNA re-replication in vivo (Fig 1), eventually culminating in an elevation of octa- and higher levels of ploidy (Fig 2A). CDK1 kinase activity is essential for cell division and inhibition of CDK1 activity is sufficient to prevent mitotic progression [59] and block hepatic tumorigenesis [15]. Hence, despite the increase in cell cycle and cytokine-associated gene expressions (Fig 3G, S3 and S4 Figs), the loss of CDK1 kinase activity led to Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes being unable to undergo mitosis (and correspondingly, nuclear division) as well as cytokinesis. This likely explains the presence of increased mononuclear polyploid hepatocytes, reflecting the occurrence of possible pathological polyploidization in Cdk1Liv-/- liver.
The presence of pathological polyploidy could potentially activate the DNA damage response due to increased gene dosage of genes involved in the DNA damage pathway [57]. Additionally, excessive CDK2 activity in the absence of CDK1 leading to persistent DNA re-replication [15] can also trigger the DNA damage response due to increased stalled replication forks and exposure of single-stranded DNA at fragile sites in the genome [35, 60]. Indeed, our transcriptomic analysis (Fig 3), coupled to increased γH2AX, phosphorylated CHK1 and phosphorylated p53 (Fig 2), suggested the presence of DNA damage leading to activation of p53 and the DNA damage response in Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes. With the absence of these phenotypes in the DKO mice (Fig 7C–7J), our study proposes a more direct role of DNA re-replication and polyploidy or CDK2 itself in these pathological processes.
The activation of p53 might be responsible for the increased incidence of apoptosis among isolated Cdk1Liv-/- hepatocytes [38], shown by the elevated expression of pro-apoptotic genes and the cytoplasmic release of mitochondrial cytochrome c (S1 Fig), as well as the presence of a sub-G1 population of cells upon flow cytometry (Fig 7C, S1D Fig). Interestingly, a recent publication found that TP53-mutated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with pathological polyploidy, but not Tert- or Ctnnb1-mutated HCC [56]. While one can envision the development of pathological polyploidy in p53-deficient cells given the importance of p53 in the DNA damage response, from another angle, this observation agrees with our hypothesis. This is because only upon loss of p53 function would the development of pathological polyploidy in hepatocytes not induce p53-dependent apoptosis, thereby allowing transformation of hepatocytes to HCC.
There is increased evidence linking inflammation with the progression of advanced liver diseases like NAFLD and NASH [61]. In the Cdk1Liv-/- mouse model, we observe the presence of F4/80+ Kupffer cells starting at P14 and there was an early onset of inflammation in the absence of any external insult (Fig 4). This was possibly due to NFκB signalling triggered by p53 activity downstream of DNA damage (Fig 8). In particular, p53-dependent activation of NFκB acts via a non-canonical pathway involving the phosphorylation of NFκB p65 subunit by RPS6KA1 at S536 [53], although we cannot exclude the contribution from other signalling pathways given that S536 can be phosphorylated by a multitude of kinases [62]. NFκB p65 pS536 is then able to target genes such as Ccl2 (Fig 5F), hence inducing increased expression of Ccl2. CCL2 can then promote increased immune infiltration of monocytes (Fig 4A and 4B) causing an inflammatory phenotype.
CCL2 is commonly associated with the pathogenesis of fibrosis. For example, increase in serum levels of CCL2 is associated with progression from hepatic steatosis to NASH [63], and CCL2 expression is correlated with disease severity in Hepatitis C-dependent liver fibrosis [64]. On the other hand, pharmacological inhibition of CCL2 accelerated fibrosis resolution in mouse models of liver fibrosis [65], thereby supporting the development of drugs targeting CCL2 receptors for NASH therapy [66]. As expected, with the increase in CCL2 levels, fibrosis was present in the Cdk1Liv-/- liver, apparent by the up-regulation of fibrosis-associated genes (Fig 4C) and prevalent Sirius Red staining (Fig 4D). While most studies on fibrosis focus on the interactions between immune cells and hepatic stellate cells, our data suggest that hepatocytes are directly involved in promoting fibrosis (Fig 8) through up-regulation of Ccl2 and Cxcl10 to initiate inflammation, and also Timp1 and Serpine1 (Fig 5A), which are both important modulators of fibrosis [67, 68]. Interestingly, Cxcl10, Timp1 and Serpine1 are transcriptional targets of NFκB [69–71], further supporting the activation of NFκB in hepatocytes. In this respect, the Cdk1Liv-/- mouse model is a useful model to study the commencing process of liver inflammation that leads to fibrosis and thereby more severe liver diseases.
It is noteworthy that we also observed hepatocyte hypertrophy and liver fibrosis in Ccna2Liv-/- mice (Fig 6), a different mouse model of impaired hepatocyte proliferation [54]. Similarly, previous work on Survivin, a mitotic factor required for proper assembly and dissemination of metaphase chromosomes, indicated that the loss of Survivin in liver resulted in a block in mitosis that led to polyploidy, liver damage, and fibrosis [28]. This implies that our observations are not limited to only the Cdk1Liv-/- mouse model, but might be a more generally applicable principle where hepatocytes are defective in proliferation. This also proposes that the mechanism of liver damage (Fig 8) in such cases is likely to be similar, and is worth looking at as a potential therapeutic avenue for ameliorating phenotypes in liver diseases that affect hepatocyte division.
In summary, we report here the analysis of a model where hepatocytes lack the capacity to divide. Interestingly, this model displays many of the hallmarks that are found in human patients with liver disease. Most strikingly, the phenotypes of this model develop without any external insults (like high fat diet and methionine/choline-deficient diet). In other words, all of the phenotypes in the Cdk1Liv-/- mice develop spontaneously, which indicates that the loss of self-renewal capacity of hepatocytes has broad effects on inflammation, DNA damage, and fibrosis. Furthermore, we provide much-needed evidence implicating direct contribution of polyploidy to liver pathology. It remains to been seen whether similar effects can be detected in the human liver and how this can be exploited therapeutically.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Organs used in this study were obtained from mice housed and handled according to the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research (NACLAR) Guidelines with all animal experiments approved by the A*STAR Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #171268).
Genetic mouse models, liver isolation and blood tests
Cdk1Liv-/- (Cdk1flox/flox Albumin-Cre) mice [15, 32] and Ccna2Liv-/- (Ccna2flox/flox Albumin-Cre) mice [54] have been described previously. Double knockout (DKO; Cdk1flox/flox Albumin-Cre, Cdk2-/-) mice lacking both CDK1 and CDK2 in the liver were generated by crossing Cdk1Liv-/- mice with Cdk2+/- mice [72] and sibling mated for at least three generations before those with the right genotype were collected for tissue collection. Only male mice were used for experiments as to avoid hormonal effects as confounding factors. Mice were fed with standard diet ab libitum and housed in Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) conditions under 12-hour light/dark cycle at the A* STAR Biological Resource Center (A*STAR BRC) in Singapore.
RNA extraction, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
RNA was extracted from isolated hepatocytes using the TRIzol reagent (15596018; Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For snap frozen liver tissues, samples were homogenized in TRIzol reagent in a MP Biomedicals Lysing Matrix D tube (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Precellys 24 homogeniser (Bertin Technologies). 2μg of RNA was used to prepare complementary DNA (cDNA) using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (K1641; Thermo Fisher Scientific). ChIP was performed as described before [73] using 2μL of anti-NFκB p65 pS536 antibody (#3033; Cell Signaling Technology) per ChIP sample. DNA was then isolated from eluted samples using ChIP DNA Clean & Concentrator (D5205; Zymo Research) in 20μL volume. qPCR was then performed with the Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (K0221; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using 10ng cDNA or 1uL of ChIP input/sample per reaction. Analysis was performed via the 2-ΔΔCt method [74] with Eef2 (for cDNA) or input (for ChIP) as the normalizing control. Negative control for ChIP was a gene desert in chromosome 15 [75]. Primer sequences are available in S4 Table.
Transcriptomic analysis
RNA from isolated hepatocytes and snap frozen liver tissues was extracted with the TRIzol reagent as above with alteration to the protocol. The aqueous phase after phase separation using chloroform was transferred to spin columns from PureLink RNA Mini Kit (12183025; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and washed with provided wash buffers. Treatment with rDNase (740963; Macherey-Nagel) was performed on column and eluted with provided RNase-free water. RNA fragmentation, library generation, and sequencing were performed as previously described [32]. The data from the RNA sequencing is shown in S1 Table and the raw data has been deposited at GEO under GSE159497 (WT and Cdk1Liv-/- isolated hepatocytes and whole liver from 2-week-old mice).
Basescope assay
Custom probes targeting Cdk1 exon 3 were designed by ACDBio. Formalin-fixed liver sections were subjected to Basescope assay using the Basescope Detection Reagent Kit–RED (ACDBio) according to manufacturer’s protocol [76].
Cytokine array
50mg of snap frozen liver tissue was homogenized using a dounce homogenizer in 500μL PBS supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). 1μL of Triton X-100 was added and lysate was frozen at -80°C for at least 30 minutes. Lysates were then thawed and centrifuged at 13,000g for 10 minutes to remove any debris. Array was performed on the lysate using the Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array, Panel A (ARY006; R&D Systems) according to provided instructions, detection was done with 2mL of chemiluminescence substrate, and exposure to photographic film (Kodak), quantification was performed using ImageJ [77].
Biological sample collection
Liver was harvested when mice reached the indicated timepoints and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for histology, frozen in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek) in liquid nitrogen-cooled isopentane for cryosections, or snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA and protein extraction. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture, kept in lithium heparin-coated Microvette 500 LH (20.1345.100; Sarstedt), and analysed using the Comprehensive Diagnostic Profile rotor (500–0038; Abaxis) on the Vetscan VS2 (Abaxis) for liver function, or using the Hemavet 950 (Drew Scientific) for blood leukocyte counting. Embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) hepatoblasts and postnatal day 14 (P14) hepatocytes were isolated using a previously published protocol [78].
Protein extraction and immunoblotting
Protein extraction and immunoblotting were performed as previously described [32]. Mitochondria-cytoplasm fractionation of isolated hepatocytes was executed as detailed [79]. Antibodies used for immunoblotting include anti-CDK1 (1:1000; ab18; Abcam), anti-CDK2 (1:200; sc-6248; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CHK1 (1:400; sc-8408; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CHK1 pS345 (1:500; 2348; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-COX IV (1:500; 4844; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CYC (1:1000; 4280; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p21Cdkn1a (1:200; sc-6246; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p53 (1:2000; #9282; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p53 pS15 (1:2000; #9284; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-TUBB (1:5000; MRB-435P, Covance Antibody Products) and anti-HSP90 (1:5000; 610418; BD Biosciences). Quantification of blots was done using ImageJ software [77].
Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and sirius red staining
Liver tissues were fixed in 10% NBF for 24 hours, dehydrated via ethanol baths and then embedded in paraffin blocks using a Leica EG1160 machine. Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned to 5μm thickness, adhered to Superfrost Plus slides (4951PLUS; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and dried overnight. Slides were de-paraffinized in xylene baths and re-hydrated in de-ionized water. H&E staining of re-hydrated slides was performed as before [80]. For Sirius Red staining, rehydrated sections were stained in Picro-Sirius Red stain (ab246832; Abcam) for 4 hours and washed in running water for 2 minutes. Stained slides were dehydrated in isopropanol baths and xylene before being mounted with Eukitt quick-hardening mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich) and coverslip and allowed to dry overnight. Images were captured using the Olympus BX-61 upright microscope with 20x air lens or 40x oil lens. Quantification of Sirius Red-positive area was done using Fiji [81].
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
Formalin-fixed liver sections from paraffin blocks were de-paraffinized. De-paraffinized slides were submersed in 1% hydrogen peroxide (in methanol) to block endogenous peroxidase activity before being rehydrated in deionized water. Antigen retrieval was then performed either using Proteinase K solution or trisodium citrate solution. For antigen retrieval in Proteinase K solution, slides were incubated with 20μg/mL Proteinase K in Tris-EDTA buffer (10mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 1mM EDTA) at 37°C for 20 minutes. Antigen retrieval in trisodium citrate solution has been described previously [82]. Following antigen retrieval, slides were washed in PBS and blocked in 1% BSA in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween (0.1% PBS-T). Slides were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 0.1% BSA in 0.1% PBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature before washing in 0.1% PBS-T. For immunohistochemistry, slides were subsequently developed using the Dako DAB + Substrate Chromogen System (Agilent) according to manufacturer’s protocol, washed with running water, counterstained with 10% Harris Hematoxylin solution, washed with running water, and then mounted as above. Images were captured using an Olympus BX-61 microscope. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry were anti-F4/80 (1:200; MCA497GA; Bio-Rad) and anti-PCNA (1:1000; #2586; Cell Signaling Technology). For immunofluorescence, antigen retrieval was done as above, blocking, primary and secondary antibody incubations, and image acquisition were performed as previously described [82]. Antibodies used for immunofluorescence were anti-histone H3 pS10 (1:200; 06–570; Merck Millipore) and anti-γH2AX (1:150; 05–636; Sigma-Aldrich).
Flow cytometry
Pelleted isolated hepatocytes were resuspended in complete DMEM containing 0.5mg/mL propidium iodide solution (Sigma-Aldrich) to a density of about 1x106 cells per mL. DNA profile was analysed using the BD LSRII (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed with at least three biological replicates. Statistical analyses, aside from RNAseq data analysis, Mendelian genetic analysis and quantification of binuclear/mononuclear hepatocytes, were performed with unpaired T-test with Welch’s correction using GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software). Mendelian genetic analysis was performed with chi-square test and quantification of binuclear/mononuclear hepatocytes was analysed with two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was considered when p-value<0.05 and shown as: p-value<0.05 (*); p-value<0.01 (**); p-value<0.001 (***).
For RNAseq data analysis, sequence reads were aligned using the STAR mapper [83] and fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) quantification was performed using the RSEM tool [84]. A standard data quality control procedure was performed on the sequence alignment results using FastQC, and we chose not to perform data normalization upon inspecting the equal distribution of FPKM values across the samples. To remove artefacts of statistical analysis in extremely low abundance genes, a small fudge factor (0.5) was added to all FPKM values and differential expression analysis done using two sample T-test. We adjusted p-values for multiple testing by calculating q-values [85], and selected all genes with q-value 0.1 or lower as significantly differentially expressed genes. Raw data for all plots are listed in S5 Table.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [a]
hepatocytes are prone to apoptosis.
S2 Fig [tif]
(related to ).
S3 Fig [a]
(related to ).
S4 Fig [tif]
(related to ).
S5 Fig [tif]
(related to ).
S6 Fig [tif]
(related to ).
S7 Fig [tif]
(related to and ).
S1 Table [xlsx]
List of genes detected by RNAseq in wild-type (WT) and isolated hepatocytes and whole liver.
S2 Table [xlsx]
List of gene ontologies enriched among statistically significant differentially expressed genes from the RNAseq data.
S3 Table [xlsx]
Distribution of genotype in a background, with numbers and percentage (%) for each genotype.
S4 Table [xlsx]
List of primer sequences used for qPCR and ChIP-qPCR.
S5 Table [xlsx]
In separate sheets, the excel spreadsheet contains the numerical data for Figs , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and .
Zdroje
1. Miyaoka Y, Miyajima A. To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration. Cell Div. 2013;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 23786799
2. Macdonald RA. "Lifespan" of liver cells. Autoradio-graphic study using tritiated thymidine in normal, cirrhotic, and partially hepatectomized rats. Arch Intern Med. 1961;107:335–43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1961.03620030023003 13764742
3. Yang SQ, Lin HZ, Mandal AK, Huang J, Diehl AM. Disrupted signaling and inhibited regeneration in obese mice with fatty livers: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathophysiology. Hepatology. 2001;34(4 Pt 1):694–706. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.28054 11584365
4. Zhao G, Nakano K, Chijiiwa K, Ueda J, Tanaka M. Inhibited activities in CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, activating protein-1 and cyclins after hepatectomy in rats with thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;292(2):474–81. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6630 11906187
5. Vetelainen R, van Vliet AK, van Gulik TM. Severe steatosis increases hepatocellular injury and impairs liver regeneration in a rat model of partial hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):44–50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225253.84501.0e 17197964
6. Han MS, Park SY, Shinzawa K, Kim S, Chung KW, Lee JH, et al. Lysophosphatidylcholine as a death effector in the lipoapoptosis of hepatocytes. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(1):84–97. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700184-JLR200 17951222
7. Karidis NP, Delladetsima I, Theocharis S. Hepatocyte Turnover in Chronic HCV-Induced Liver Injury and Cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:654105. doi: 10.1155/2015/654105 25892989
8. Oh IS, Park SH. Immune-mediated Liver Injury in Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Immune Netw. 2015;15(4):191–8. doi: 10.4110/in.2015.15.4.191 26330805
9. Kitada T, Seki S, Kawakita N, Kuroki T, Monna T. Telomere shortening in chronic liver diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;211(1):33–9. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1774 7779103
10. Wiemann SU, Satyanarayana A, Tsahuridu M, Tillmann HL, Zender L, Klempnauer J, et al. Hepatocyte telomere shortening and senescence are general markers of human liver cirrhosis. FASEB J. 2002;16(9):935–42. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0977com 12087054
11. Aravinthan A, Scarpini C, Tachtatzis P, Verma S, Penrhyn-Lowe S, Harvey R, et al. Hepatocyte senescence predicts progression in non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2013;58(3):549–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.10.031 23142622
12. Gentric G, Maillet V, Paradis V, Couton D, L'Hermitte A, Panasyuk G, et al. Oxidative stress promotes pathologic polyploidization in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(3):981–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI73957 25621497
13. Morgan D. The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control. London: New Science Press; 2007. 297 p.
14. Lohka MJ, Hayes MK, Maller JL. Purification of maturation-promoting factor, an intracellular regulator of early mitotic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(9):3009–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3009 3283736
15. Diril MK, Ratnacaram CK, Padmakumar VC, Du T, Wasser M, Coppola V, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(10):3826–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115201109 22355113
16. Itzhaki JE, Gilbert CS, Porter AC. Construction by gene targeting in human cells of a "conditional' CDC2 mutant that rereplicates its DNA. Nat Genet. 1997;15(3):258–65. doi: 10.1038/ng0397-258 9054937
17. Santamaria D, Barriere C, Cerqueira A, Hunt S, Tardy C, Newton K, et al. Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature. 2007;448(7155):811–5. doi: 10.1038/nature06046 17700700
18. Krude T, Jackman M, Pines J, Laskey RA. Cyclin/Cdk-dependent initiation of DNA replication in a human cell-free system. Cell. 1997;88(1):109–19. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81863-2 9019396
19. Ortega S, Prieto I, Odajima J, Martin A, Dubus P, Sotillo R, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Nat Genet. 2003;35(1):25–31. doi: 10.1038/ng1232 12923533
20. Berthet C, Aleem E, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Kaldis P. Cdk2 knockout mice are viable. Curr Biol. 2003;13(20):1775–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.024 14561402
21. Margall-Ducos G, Celton-Morizur S, Couton D, Bregerie O, Desdouets C. Liver tetraploidization is controlled by a new process of incomplete cytokinesis. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 20):3633–9. doi: 10.1242/jcs.016907 17895361
22. Celton-Morizur S, Merlen G, Couton D, Margall-Ducos G, Desdouets C. The insulin/Akt pathway controls a specific cell division program that leads to generation of binucleated tetraploid liver cells in rodents. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(7):1880–7. doi: 10.1172/jci38677 19603546
23. Zhang S, Zhou K, Luo X, Li L, Tu HC, Sehgal A, et al. The Polyploid State Plays a Tumor-Suppressive Role in the Liver. Dev Cell. 2018;44(4):447–59 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.010 29429824
24. Kumar V, Agrawal R, Pandey A, Kopf S, Hoeffgen M, Kaymak S, et al. Compromised DNA repair is responsible for diabetes-associated fibrosis. EMBO J. 2020;39(11):e103477. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019103477 32338774
25. Toyoda H, Bregerie O, Vallet A, Nalpas B, Pivert G, Brechot C, et al. Changes to hepatocyte ploidy and binuclearity profiles during human chronic viral hepatitis. Gut. 2005;54(2):297–302. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.043893 15647198
26. Nevzorova YA, Tschaharganeh D, Gassler N, Geng Y, Weiskirchen R, Sicinski P, et al. Aberrant cell cycle progression and endoreplication in regenerating livers of mice that lack a single E-type cyclin. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):691–703, e1-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.003 19445941
27. Chen HZ, Ouseph MM, Li J, Pecot T, Chokshi V, Kent L, et al. Canonical and atypical E2Fs regulate the mammalian endocycle. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(11):1192–202. doi: 10.1038/ncb2595 23064266
28. Li D, Cen J, Chen X, Conway EM, Ji Y, Hui L. Hepatic loss of survivin impairs postnatal liver development and promotes expansion of hepatic progenitor cells in mice. Hepatology. 2013;58(6):2109–21. doi: 10.1002/hep.26601 23813590
29. Miettinen TP, Caldez MJ, Kaldis P, Bjorklund M. Cell size control—a mechanism for maintaining fitness and function. Bioessays. 2017;39(9). doi: 10.1002/bies.201700058 28752618
30. Berasain C, Avila MA. Regulation of hepatocyte identity and quiescence. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(20):3831–51. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1970-7 26089250
31. Dai J, Sultan S, Taylor SS, Higgins JM. The kinase haspin is required for mitotic histone H3 Thr3 phosphorylation and normal metaphase chromosome alignment. Genes Dev. 2005;19(4):472–88. doi: 10.1101/gad.1267105 15681610
32. Caldez MJ, Van Hul N, Koh HWL, Teo XQ, Fan JJ, Tan PY, et al. Metabolic Remodeling during Liver Regeneration. Dev Cell. 2018;47(4):425–38 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.09.020 30344111
33. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell. 2007;129(4):665–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003 17512402
34. Miettinen TP, Pessa HK, Caldez MJ, Fuhrer T, Diril MK, Sauer U, et al. Identification of transcriptional and metabolic programs related to mammalian cell size. Curr Biol. 2014;24(6):598–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.071 24613310
35. Di Micco R, Fumagalli M, Cicalese A, Piccinin S, Gasparini P, Luise C, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature. 2006;444(7119):638–42. doi: 10.1038/nature05327 17136094
36. Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H. ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(13):4129–39. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.13.4129-4139.2001 11390642
37. Shieh SY, Ikeda M, Taya Y, Prives C. DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell. 1997;91(3):325–34. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80416-x 9363941
38. Aubrey BJ, Kelly GL, Janic A, Herold MJ, Strasser A. How does p53 induce apoptosis and how does this relate to p53-mediated tumour suppression? Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):104–13. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.169 29149101
39. Yu J, Zhang L, Hwang PM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. PUMA induces the rapid apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2001;7(3):673–82. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00213-1 11463391
40. Nakano K, Vousden KH. PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol Cell. 2001;7(3):683–94. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00214-3 11463392
41. Li M, He Y, Dubois W, Wu X, Shi J, Huang J. Distinct regulatory mechanisms and functions for p53-activated and p53-repressed DNA damage response genes in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell. 2012;46(1):30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.020 22387025
42. Schuler M, Bossy-Wetzel E, Goldstein JC, Fitzgerald P, Green DR. p53 induces apoptosis by caspase activation through mitochondrial cytochrome c release. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(10):7337–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7337 10702305
43. Si-Tayeb K, Lemaigre FP, Duncan SA. Organogenesis and development of the liver. Dev Cell. 2010;18(2):175–89. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.011 20159590
44. Ju C, Tacke F. Hepatic macrophages in homeostasis and liver diseases: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13(3):316–27. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.104 26908374
45. Austyn JM, Gordon S. F4/80, a monoclonal antibody directed specifically against the mouse macrophage. Eur J Immunol. 1981;11(10):805–15. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830111013 7308288
46. Scott CL, Zheng F, De Baetselier P, Martens L, Saeys Y, De Prijck S, et al. Bone marrow-derived monocytes give rise to self-renewing and fully differentiated Kupffer cells. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10321. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10321 26813785
47. Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(2):209–18. doi: 10.1172/JCI24282 15690074
48. Zhan Z, Chen Y, Duan Y, Li L, Mew K, Hu P, et al. Identification of key genes, pathways and potential therapeutic agents for liver fibrosis using an integrated bioinformatics analysis. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6645. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6645 30923657
49. Rodier F, Coppe JP, Patil CK, Hoeijmakers WA, Munoz DP, Raza SR, et al. Persistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(8):973–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1909 19597488
50. Serbina NV, Pamer EG. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(3):311–7. doi: 10.1038/ni1309 16462739
51. Ajuebor MN, Flower RJ, Hannon R, Christie M, Bowers K, Verity A, et al. Endogenous monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 recruits monocytes in the zymosan peritonitis model. J Leukoc Biol. 1998;63(1):108–16. doi: 10.1002/jlb.63.1.108 9469480
52. Ito A, Hong C, Rong X, Zhu X, Tarling EJ, Hedde PN, et al. LXRs link metabolism to inflammation through Abca1-dependent regulation of membrane composition and TLR signaling. Elife. 2015;4:e08009. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08009 26173179
53. Bohuslav J, Chen LF, Kwon H, Mu Y, Greene WC. p53 induces NF-kappaB activation by an IkappaB kinase-independent mechanism involving phosphorylation of p65 by ribosomal S6 kinase 1. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(25):26115–25. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313509200 15073170
54. Gopinathan L, Tan SL, Padmakumar VC, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Kaldis P. Loss of Cdk2 and cyclin A2 impairs cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2014;74(14):3870–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3440 24802190
55. Kanakkanthara A, Jeganathan KB, Limzerwala JF, Baker DJ, Hamada M, Nam HJ, et al. Cyclin A2 is an RNA binding protein that controls Mre11 mRNA translation. Science. 2016;353(6307):1549–52. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7463 27708105
56. Bou-Nader M, Caruso S, Donne R, Celton-Morizur S, Calderaro J, Gentric G, et al. Polyploidy spectrum: a new marker in HCC classification. Gut. 2020;69(2):355–64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318021 30979717
57. Zheng L, Dai H, Zhou M, Li X, Liu C, Guo Z, et al. Polyploid cells rewire DNA damage response networks to overcome replication stress-induced barriers for tumour progression. Nat Commun. 2012;3:815. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1825 22569363
58. Pandit SK, Westendorp B, de Bruin A. Physiological significance of polyploidization in mammalian cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2013;23(11):556–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.06.002 23849927
59. Vassilev LT, Tovar C, Chen S, Knezevic D, Zhao X, Sun H, et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(28):10660–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600447103 16818887
60. Casper AM, Nghiem P, Arlt MF, Glover TW. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell. 2002;111(6):779–89. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01113-3 12526805
61. Asrih M, Jornayvaz FR. Inflammation as a potential link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. J Endocrinol. 2013;218(3):R25–36. doi: 10.1530/JOE-13-0201 23833274
62. Christian F, Smith EL, Carmody RJ. The Regulation of NF-kappaB Subunits by Phosphorylation. Cells. 2016;5(1):12.
63. Haukeland JW, Damas JK, Konopski Z, Loberg EM, Haaland T, Goverud I, et al. Systemic inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is characterized by elevated levels of CCL2. J Hepatol. 2006;44(6):1167–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.02.011 16618517
64. Neuman MG, Benhamou JP, Marcellin P, Valla D, Malkiewicz IM, Katz GG, et al. Cytokine—chemokine and apoptotic signatures in patients with hepatitis C. Transl Res. 2007;149(3):126–36. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2006.11.002 17320798
65. Baeck C, Wei X, Bartneck M, Fech V, Heymann F, Gassler N, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of the chemokine C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) accelerates liver fibrosis regression by suppressing Ly-6C(+) macrophage infiltration in mice. Hepatology. 2014;59(3):1060–72. doi: 10.1002/hep.26783 24481979
66. Anstee QM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Wong VW, Abdelmalek MF, Younossi ZM, Yuan J, et al. Cenicriviroc for the treatment of liver fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: AURORA Phase 3 study design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;89:105922. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105922 31881392
67. Yoshiji H, Kuriyama S, Miyamoto Y, Thorgeirsson UP, Gomez DE, Kawata M, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 promotes liver fibrosis development in a transgenic mouse model. Hepatology. 2000;32(6):1248–54. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20521 11093731
68. Ghosh AK, Vaughan DE. PAI-1 in tissue fibrosis. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(2):493–507. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22783 21465481
69. Yeruva S, Ramadori G, Raddatz D. NF-kappaB-dependent synergistic regulation of CXCL10 gene expression by IL-1beta and IFN-gamma in human intestinal epithelial cell lines. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(3):305–17. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0396-6 18046562
70. Wilczynska KM, Gopalan SM, Bugno M, Kasza A, Konik BS, Bryan L, et al. A novel mechanism of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 activation by interleukin-1 in primary human astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(46):34955–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604616200 17012236
71. Raskatov JA, Meier JL, Puckett JW, Yang F, Ramakrishnan P, Dervan PB. Modulation of NF-kappaB-dependent gene transcription using programmable DNA minor groove binders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(4):1023–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118506109 22203967
72. Ortica F, Moustrou C, Berthet J, Favaro G, Samat A, Guglielmetti R, et al. Comprehensive photokinetic and NMR study of a biphotochromic supermolecule involving two naphthopyrans linked to a central thiophene unit through acetylenic bonds. Photochem Photobiol. 2003;78(6):558–66. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078<0558:cpanso>2.0.co;2 14743863
73. Shang Y, Myers M, Brown M. Formation of the androgen receptor transcription complex. Mol Cell. 2002;9(3):601–10. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00471-9 11931767
74. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 11846609
75. Ji X, Dadon DB, Abraham BJ, Lee TI, Jaenisch R, Bradner JE, et al. Chromatin proteomic profiling reveals novel proteins associated with histone-marked genomic regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(12):3841–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502971112 25755260
76. Fu Y, Hou B, Weng C, Liu W, Dai J, Zhao C, et al. Functional ectopic neuritogenesis by retinal rod bipolar cells is regulated by miR-125b-5p during retinal remodeling in RCS rats. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01261-x 28432360
77. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089 22930834
78. Guguen-Guillouzo C. Isolation and culture of animal and human hepatocytes. In: Freshney RI, Freshney MG, editors. Culture of Epithelial Cells. Second Edition ed: Wiley-Liss, Inc.; 2002.
79. Frezza C, Cipolat S, Scorrano L. Organelle isolation: functional mitochondria from mouse liver, muscle and cultured fibroblasts. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):287–95. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.478 17406588
80. Satyanarayana A, Berthet C, Lopez-Molina J, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Kaldis P. Genetic substitution of Cdk1 by Cdk2 leads to embryonic lethality and loss of meiotic function of Cdk2. Development. 2008;135(20):3389–400. doi: 10.1242/dev.024919 18787066
81. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 22743772
82. Palmer N, Talib SZA, Ratnacaram CK, Low D, Bisteau X, Lee JHS, et al. CDK2 regulates the NRF1/Ehmt1 axis during meiotic prophase I. J Cell Biol. 2019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201903125 31350280
83. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 23104886
84. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 21816040
85. Storey JD. A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Statist Soc B. 2002;64(3):479–98.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 11
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
- Zkoušku z bariatrické chirurgie nejlépe složil ChatGPT-4. Za ním zůstaly Bing a Bard
- Raději si zajděte na oční! Jak souvisí citlivost zraku s rozvojem demence?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Stability of SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies
- Formal commentary
- No association between SCN9A and monogenic human epilepsy disorders
- Oxidative stress antagonizes fluoroquinolone drug sensitivity via the SoxR-SUF Fe-S cluster homeostatic axis