Two Cdc2 Kinase Genes with Distinct Functions in Vegetative and Infectious Hyphae in
In the model yeasts and filamentous fungi, CDC2 is an essential gene that encodes the only CDK essential for mitotic cell cycle progression. However, the wheat scab fungus F. graminearum contains two CDC2 orthologs. The cdc2A and cdc2B deletion mutants had no defects in vegetative growth but deletion of both is lethal. Whereas the cdc2B mutant was normal, the cdc2A mutant was almost non-pathogenic, indicating that only Cdc2A is essential in infectious hyphae. Cdc2A and Cdc2B differ in subcellular localization and only localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus was increased in cells active in mitosis. Furthermore, F. graminearum uniquely has two orthologs of Ipl1 Aurora kinase and mutants deleted of orthologs of five essential yeast mitotic kinase genes were viable. However, most of these mutants were significantly reduced in virulence. Overall, our data indicate that F. graminearum differs from the model fungi in CDK and other key mitotic kinase genes, and cell cycle regulation is different between vegetative and infectious hyphae. This is the first report on two Cdc2 kinases in fungi and they differ in subcellular localization and functions during sexual reproduction and plant infection.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Pathog 11(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004913
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004913
Summary
In the model yeasts and filamentous fungi, CDC2 is an essential gene that encodes the only CDK essential for mitotic cell cycle progression. However, the wheat scab fungus F. graminearum contains two CDC2 orthologs. The cdc2A and cdc2B deletion mutants had no defects in vegetative growth but deletion of both is lethal. Whereas the cdc2B mutant was normal, the cdc2A mutant was almost non-pathogenic, indicating that only Cdc2A is essential in infectious hyphae. Cdc2A and Cdc2B differ in subcellular localization and only localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus was increased in cells active in mitosis. Furthermore, F. graminearum uniquely has two orthologs of Ipl1 Aurora kinase and mutants deleted of orthologs of five essential yeast mitotic kinase genes were viable. However, most of these mutants were significantly reduced in virulence. Overall, our data indicate that F. graminearum differs from the model fungi in CDK and other key mitotic kinase genes, and cell cycle regulation is different between vegetative and infectious hyphae. This is the first report on two Cdc2 kinases in fungi and they differ in subcellular localization and functions during sexual reproduction and plant infection.
Introduction
In eukaryotic cells, progression through mitosis and cell cycle is governed by a complex regulatory system. The central components of this system are the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) [1, 2] that are activated by binding to a regulatory cyclin subunit as well as by phosphorylation of a threonine residue adjacent to the kinase active site by the CDK-activating kinase (CAK) [3, 4]. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe are two model organisms used extensively for cell cycle studies [5]. Both of them have a single CDK gene (CDC2 or CDC28) that is required for all cell cycle transitions [1, 4, 6]. The cdc2 or cdc28 null mutant is non-viable [7, 8]. Other members of the CDK family are involved in various cellular processes rather than cell cycle [1]. In addition to CDKs, a number of protein kinases are important for the onset and progression through mitosis, including members of the Aurora, Polo-like, and NimA kinase families as well as kinases involved in checkpoints that regulate entry and exit of mitosis [6, 9–12].
Studies in the budding and fission yeasts have provided insights into the common cell cycle control mechanisms for eukaryotes. Nevertheless, distinctive features and unusual mechanisms of mitosis and cell cycle regulation also are apparent in the two yeast species [4, 5]. For examples, a single cyclin, Cdc13, is sufficient for the mitotic function of Cdc2 in S. pombe. In S. cerevisiae, at least four M-cyclins (Clb1-Clb4) are required to orderly activate Cdc28 for progression into mitosis [1]. Furthermore, whereas S. cerevisiae has a single essential CAK gene CAK1, the fission yeast employs two partially redundant CAK systems, the Mcs6-Mcs2 complex and Csk1, to activate Cdc2 [1, 13, 14]. Cak1 is required for the activation of Cdc28 in S. cerevisiae but Csk1 is not essential for Cdc2 activity in S. pombe. KIN28, the ortholog of S. pombe msc6, lacks CAK activity in the budding yeast.
Most of the mitotic protein kinase genes identified in S. cerevisiae or S. pombe are present in filamentous ascomycetes [15, 16]. Similar to the yeasts, the model filamentous fungi Aspergillus nidulans and Neurospora crassa have a single CDC2 ortholog that regulates cell cycle progression and is essential for growth [17, 18]. Interestingly, in a previous study to systematically characterize its kinome [19], we found that Fusarium graminearum, a causal agent of wheat and barley head blight disease, contains two putative CDC2 orthologs that were named CDC2A and CDC2B here. Interestingly, only the cdc2A mutant was defective in sexual reproduction and plant infection [19]. To further characterize the functional divergence of these two CDC2 orthologs in F. graminearum, in this study we examined the expression profiles and subcellular localizations of Cdc2A and Cdc2B in different growth and infection stages. Cdc2A and Cdc2B differed in subcellular localization and only Cdc2A is required for cell cycle regulation in infectious hyphae and asci. Functional studies suggested that both the N- and C-terminal regions of Cdc2A are important for its function during ascosporogenesis and pathogenesis but only the N-terminal region is responsible for its subcellular localization. Furthermore, other pivotal mitotic kinases of F. graminearum, such as CAK and Aurora kinases, also have distinctive features in comparison with those of the budding and fission yeasts. Overall, our data indicate that F. graminearum differs from the model yeasts and filamentous fungi in CDK and other key mitotic kinase genes, and cell cycle regulation is different between vegetative and infectious hyphae. Cdc2A but not Cdc2B plays a stage-specific role in regulating cell cycle progression during ascospore formation and plant infection.
Results
Comparative analysis of two CDC2 orthologs in Fusarium species
Unlike the model fungi used for cell cycle studies, F. graminearum has two putative CDC2 orthologs that were named CDC2A (FGSG_08468) and CDC2B (FGSG_03132) in this study. The Cdc2A and Cdc2B proteins share 78% identity in amino acid sequences and both have typical CDK structural components, including the PSTAIRE helix, a critical cyclin interface, and the activation T-loop, as well as the inhibitory and activating phosphorylation sites (Fig 1A and S1 Fig). Among all the sequenced Sordariomycetes, only Fusarium species, including F. verticillioides, F. pseudograminearum, and F. solani, have two CDC2 genes. The F. oxysporum genome contains three CDC2 orthologs. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Cdc2A and Cdc2B orthologs from Fusarium species clustered together and their phylogeny relationship follows species evolution (S2 Fig). However, the two internal branches leading to the Cdc2B clade were remarkably long (S2 Fig), reflecting a distinctive evolutionary origin of Cdc2B.
Synteny analysis showed that the CDC2A locus and its flanking sequences are well conserved in Fusarium and other closely related species, including Trichoderma reesei (S3 Fig), Metarhizium acridum, and Verticillium dahliae. In contrast, the flanking sequences of CDC2B share only limited homologous regions among Fusarium species. There is no detectable similarity between the flanking sequences of CDC2A and CDC2B in F. graminearum and other Fusarium species. These results together with the Cdc2 phylogeny indicated that CDC2A is the original copy in Fusarium whereas CDC2B is the derived one, possibly by horizontal gene transfer (HGT).
CDC2A and CDC2B have redundant functions during vegetative growth
The putative cdc2A and cdc2B deletion mutants were generated by the split-marker approach in a previous study of the F. graminearum kinome [19]. For both CDC2A and CDC2B, three independent deletion mutants (Table 1) were confirmed by Southern blot analysis (S4 Fig) in this study. All three mutants of each gene had the same phenotype although data were presented for only one of them below. The cdc2A and cdc2B mutants had normal growth rate and colony morphology on PDA (Fig 1B). None of them had obvious defects in conidium morphology and conidiation (Fig 1C). The cdc2A and cdc2B mutants also were normal in response to oxidative, hyperosmotic, cell wall, and membrane stresses (S5A Fig). Therefore, neither CDC2A nor CDC2B is essential for conidiation and vegetative growth in F. graminearum.
Considering the importance of Cdc2/Cdc28 kinase in cell cycle, lack of growth defects in the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants indicated that these two protein kinase genes have overlapping functions. To test this hypothesis, we transformed the CDC2A knockout construct into the cdc2B mutant C2B1. After screening over 50 transformants from different transformation experiments, we failed to identify putative double mutants. We also failed to identify cdc2A cdc2B double mutants by transforming the CDC2B knockout construct into the cdc2A mutant C2A1. Although CDC2A and CDC2B individually are dispensable for growth, deleting both of them appears to be lethal. Therefore, these two Cdc2 orthologs must have redundant functions in cell cycle progression during vegetative growth and asexual reproduction.
CDC2A but not CDC2B plays a critical role in ascosporogenesis
When cultured on carrot agar plates for sexual reproduction, like the wild-type strain, the cdc2B mutant produced perithecia with cirrhi of ascospores (Fig 2A) 14 days post-fertilization (dpf). The cdc2A mutant was normal in perithecium formation but its perithecia failed to produce ascospore cirrhi 14 dpf or longer (Fig 2A). When perithecia were cracked open, it had fascicles of asci but rarely contained mature ascospores (Fig 2A). Most of the asci formed by the cdc2A mutant were aborted in ascosporogenesis and became degenerated. Among the rare cdc2A asci with ascospores, none of them had 8 ascospores. In contrast, they tended to contain one or two abnormally large ascospores (Fig 2A). Interestingly, some asci appeared to be septated and contained 4 or more compartments in 3-week or older perithecia produced by the cdc2A mutant (Fig 2B). These results suggest that CDC2A is important for ascosporogenesis but not the initial ascus development in F. graminearum. Although they have overlapping functions during vegetative growth and asexual reproduction, the specific requirement for CDC2A during ascosporogenesis is not replaceable by CDC2B.
When fascicles of asci were stained with Hoechst, the cdc2A mutant was significantly reduced in the number of nuclei in comparison with those of PH-1 (Fig 2C). Many asci appeared to be degenerated and lacked nuclei. Nevertheless, four nuclei were observed in some of the rare cdc2A ascospores. Therefore, Cdc2A may play a stage-specific role in CDK activities during meiosis and the following mitotic events in developing asci for the production of eight ascospores. In septated asci, each compartment normally contained more than one nuclei (Fig 2D). It is possible that after karyogamy, the diploid nuclei in young asci went into mitosis instead of meiosis, which is similar to the ‘return-to-growth (RTG) phenomenon observed in the swe1 mutant of S. cerevisiae [20].
CDC2A is also uniquely required for infectious growth and plant infection
We also assayed the defects of the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants in plant infection. On flowering wheat heads, the cdc2B mutant was as virulent as the wild type. In contrast, the cdc2A mutant caused only limited symptoms on the inoculated kernels in infection assays with flowering wheat heads (Fig 3A). On average, the disease index for PH-1 and the cdc2A mutant was 13.9 and 1.4, respectively.
To confirm the role of CDC2A in virulence, we also conducted infection assays with corn silks and stalks. Whereas the cdc2B mutant caused as extensive stalk rot as PH-1 14 days post-inoculation (dpi), the cdc2A mutant only caused limited stalk rot at the inoculation sites (Fig 3B). Similar results were obtained in corn silk infection assays. In comparison with PH-1 and the cdc2B mutant, the cdc2A mutant only caused limited necrosis and discoloration near the inoculation sites (Fig 3C). These results indicate that CDC2A but not CDC2B plays a critical role in plant infection. Therefore, it is likely that CDC2A has a stage-specific role in cell cycle regulation in infectious hyphae.
The cdc2A mutant is defective in infectious growth but not the differentiation of penetration branches
To further characterize the defect of the cdc2A mutant in plant infection, we first assayed the formation of penetration branches or infection cushion by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. On wheat lemma surfaces, the cdc2A mutant had no obvious defects in the formation of penetration branches (Fig 4A). Therefore, CDC2A and CDC2B likely have overlapping functions in the differentiation of initial penetration structures on plant surfaces.
Because DON is an important virulence factor in F. graminearum [21], we then assayed DON production in both rice grain cultures [22] and liquid trichothecene biosynthesis induction (TBI) medium [23]. The cdc2A mutant produced the same level of DON compared to the wild type and cdc2B mutant (S1 Table). It also formed the thick, bulbous hyphal compartments as efficiently as the wild type and cdc2B mutant in the liquid TBI culture (S5B Fig). Therefore, the defect of cdc2A mutant in plant infection is not related to DON production.
F. graminearum is known to form infectious hyphae that have distinct hyphal morphology from vegetative hyphae inside wheat coleoptiles [24]. We then examined the differentiation and growth of infectious hyphae in the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants. Similar to the wild type, the cdc2B mutant developed extensive infectious hyphae inside wheat coleoptile cells 72 hpi (Fig 4B). Under the same conditions, it is difficult to observe infectious hyphae in most of the samples inoculated with the cdc2A mutant. Rare infectious hyphae formed by the cdc2A mutant in wheat coleoptiles had restricted growth and limited branches (Fig 4B). These results indicate that CDC2A but no CDC2B is important for infectious growth in plant tissues. Therefore, CDC2A must play a more critical role than CDC2B in regulating cell cycle progression in infectious hyphae although they have overlapping functions in vegetative hyphae.
CDC2A is up-regulated during plant infection and sexual reproduction
When assayed by qRT-PCR, transcripts of CDC2A and CDC2B were detectable in germ tubes, vegetative hyphae, mating cultures, and infected wheat heads (Fig 5). Therefore, the lack of detectable phenotypes in the cdc2B mutant is not related to its stage-specific expression. Interestingly, CDC2B expression was reduced after carrot agar cultures were fertilized. The expression of CDC2A was not significantly affected in early stages of sexual reproduction but up-regulated at 14 dpf (Fig 5B). During plant infection, both CDC2A and CDC2B were up-regulated at 5 dpi in comparison with their expression at 3 dpi. However, the expression of CDC2A increased much more significantly than that of CDC2B (Fig 5C). These expression data are consistent with the importance of Cdc2A during ascosporogenesis and plant infection.
Distinct localization of Cdc2A and Cdc2B
To determine their subcellular localization, the CDC2A- and CDC2B-GFP fusion constructs generated by gap repair were transformed into the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants, respectively. For each gene, at least two GFP fusion transformants (Table 1) were obtained. The cdc2B/CDC2B-GFP transformant, similar to the cdc2B mutant, had the wild-type phenotype. The two cdc2A/CDC2A-GFP transformants, C2A-N3 and C2A-N4 (Table 1), were normal in growth, sexual reproduction (Fig 2), and plant infection (Fig 3), indicating that the CDC2A-GFP fusion fully complemented the cdc2A mutant. Therefore, deletion of CDC2A is directly responsible for the defects observed in the cdc2A mutant.
In both CDC2A- and CDC2B-GFP transformants, GFP signals were observed in conidia and vegetative hyphae, which is consistent with the fact that these two genes are constitutively expressed. In general, GFP signals appeared to be stronger in the CDC2A-GFP transformant than in the CDC2B-GFP transformant (Fig 6A). Western blot analysis confirmed the lower expression level of Cdc2B-GFP fusion compared to Cdc2A-GFP (Fig 6B). The Cdc2A-GFP fusion proteins were distributed throughout the cell but significantly enriched in the nucleus (Fig 6A and S6 Fig). In comparison with un-germinated conidia, young germ tubes had stronger GFP signals in the nucleus (Fig 6A), indicating that localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus was increased when nuclear division becomes active. In contrast, no significant changes in the subcellular localization of GFP signals were observed in the CDC2B-GFP transformant in conidia and germ tubes (Fig 6A and S6 Fig). GFP signals in the nucleus were faint in the cdc2B/CDC2B-GFP transformant.
Localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus in infectious hyphae
Because the cdc2A mutant was defective in infectious hyphae growth, we also examined the localization of Cdc2A-GFP during colonization of wheat coleoptiles. In wheat samples inoculated with the CDC2A-GFP transformant, GFP signals were observed in the nucleus of infectious hyphae developed inside coleoptile cells (Fig 6C). In contrast, we failed to observe GFP signals above the background in infectious hyphae formed by the CDC2B-GFP transformant in wheat coleoptiles (Fig 6C). It is possible that both up-regulation of CDC2A and its localization to the nucleus in infectious hyphae are related to the importance of CDC2A during invasive growth.
Enhanced localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus in developing ascospores
Because one of the major defects of the cdc2A mutant was in ascosporogenesis, we also examined the localization of Cdc2A-GFP during sexual reproduction. In the CDC2A-GFP transformant, GFP signals were observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus in mature, four-celled ascospores, with stronger signals in the nucleus (Fig 6D). However, in comparison with mature ascospores, GFP signals in the nucleus appeared to be stronger in two or three-celled developing ascospores that need one more round of mitosis to become four-celled (Fig 6C). This observation was confirmed by examined over one hundred of microscopic fields in two independent experiments. These results indicate that localization of Cdc2A to the nucleus may be increased in young ascospores undergoing mitosis, which is consistent with the observation of stronger GFP signals in germ tubes than in conidia (Fig 6A).
Both the N- and C-terminal regions are important for the function of Cdc2A in pathogenesis
Although they are highly similar in sequences and structural components, Cdc2A and Cdc2B have a number of significant type I and type II functional divergence sites [25, 26] between them (Fig 1A and S1 Fig). Most of these sites distributed in the N-terminal region adjacent to the cyclin binding [1] or inhibitory phosphorylation sites and the C-terminal region (Fig 1A and S1 Fig). To identify the Cdc2A region responsible its functional specificity, we generated the CDC2A1-242-CDC2B243-317-GFP (CDC2A/2B-GFP) and CDC2B1-142-CDC2A143-325-GFP (CDC2B/2A-GFP) chimeric constructs by replacement of the N- or C-terminal regions of CDC2A with those of CDC2B (Fig 7A), and transformed them into the cdc2A mutant. For each construct, at least two transformants with same phenotypes were obtained (Table 1). In infection assays, similar to the original cdc2A mutant, the CDC2A/2B-GFP and the CDC2B/2A-GFP transformants caused only limited symptoms on flowering wheat heads and corn silks (Fig 7B). These results indicate that both CDC2A/2B-GFP and CDC2B/2A-GFP fusion constructs failed to complement the defects of the cdc2A mutant in pathogenesis. Therefore, it is likely that both N- and C-terminal regions of CDC2A are important for its stage-specific functions in cell cycle regulation during plant infection.
When assayed for sexual reproduction, the CDC2B/2A transformant was similar to the original cdc2A deletion mutants in ascosporogenesis defects (Fig 7C). Interestingly, the CDC2A/2B transformant was partially recovered in ascospore formation. Although it still produced much fewer ascospores than the wild type, asci with 8-ascospores were produced by the CDC2A/2B transformant (Fig 7C). These data indicate that the N-terminal region of CDC2A plays a more critical role in ascosporogenesis than its C-terminal region.
The N-terminal region of Cdc2A is responsible for its localization to the nucleus
Because Cdc2A but not Cdc2B had distinct localization to the nucleus, we examined the subcellular localization of CDC2A/2B-GFP and CDC2B/2A-GFP fusion constructs. Similar to the CDC2A-GFP transformant, the CDC2A/2B-GFP transformant had stronger GFP signals in the nucleus (Fig 7D). However, localization of GFP fusion proteins to the nucleus was not observed in the CDC2B/2A-GFP transformant, which is similar to the CDC2B-GFP transformant (Fig 7D). In addition, we noticed that GFP signals were stronger in the CDC2A/2B-GFP transformant than in the CDC2B/2A-GFP transformant (Fig 7D), which was confirmed by western blot analysis (Fig 7E). These results indicate that the N-terminal region of CDC2A was responsible for its subcellular localization.
The inhibitory phosphorylation level was higher for Cdc2A than for Cdc2B
Inhibitory phosphorylation at the well-conserved Tyr15 is known to affect CDK activation and nuclear localization [27]. In Ustilago maydis inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 is required for conjugation tube formation and plant penetration [28]. Therefore, we used the anti-Tyr15 antibody [29, 30] to assay inhibitory phosphorylation levels of Cdc2A and Cdc2B in F. graminearum. The expression level of Cdc2A in the two cdc2B/CDC2B-GFP transformants (C2B-N1 and C2B-N2) was comparable to that of Cdc2B in the cdc2A/CDC2A-GFP transformant (C2A-N4). However, the inhibitory phosphorylation level of Cdc2A was obviously higher than that of Cdc2B (Fig 8A). This result was confirmed by at least three independent phosphorylation assays.
Inhibitory phosphorylation of CDKs is mediated by protein kinases orthologous to S. pombe Wee1 and S. cerevisiae Swe1 [1]. In the mutant deleted of FgWEE1 (FGSG_10228), the inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc2A and Cdc2B was completely blocked (Fig 8A). The Fgwee1 deletion mutant was aborted in ascus or ascospore development [19]. Like the cdc2A mutant, it also was defective in plant infection (Fig 8B). Therefore, lack of inhibitory phosphorylation by FgWee1 likely resulted in improper regulation of Cdc2A and Cdc2B activities and defects in cell cycle and cytokinesis regulation in F. graminearum.
FgCak1 interacts with both Cdc2A and Cdc2B
In addition to binding with cyclins, the complete activation of Cdc28 requires phosphorylation by the Cak1 kinase at the conserved T residue in the T-loop in S. cerevisiae [3, 4]. A single CAK1 ortholog (FGSG_04947) was identified in F. graminearum. In yeast two-hybrid assays, FgCak1 interacted with both Cdc2A and Cdc2B (Fig 9A). To confirm their interactions by co-IP assays, the FgCAK1-3xFLAG construct was co-transformed with the CDC2A- or CDC2B-GFP fusion construct into PH-1. In the resulting transformants (Table 1), the Cdc2A-GFP or Cdc2B-GFP band could be detected with an anti-GFP antibody in total proteins and proteins eluted from anti-FLAG beads (Fig 9B). These results indicate that both Cdc2A and Cdc2B interacted with FgCak1.
The Fgcak1 deletion mutant is defective in ascosporogenesis and pathogenesis
The Fgcak1 deletion mutants generated in a previous study [19] were confirmed by Southern blot analysis (S4 Fig) in this study. Unlike the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants, the Fgcak1 mutant was significantly reduced in growth rate and conidiation (Fig 10A). On carrot agar plates, it produced perithecia that were smaller than those of PH-1 and the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants and lacked asci or ascospores (Fig 10B). In addition, The Fgcak1 mutant failed to cause disease symptoms in infection assays with flowering wheat heads (Fig 10C), suggesting that, unlike CDC2A, FgCAK1 is essential for plant infection and sexual reproduction. It is possible that FgCak1 is involved in the activation of both Cdc2A and Cdc2B during ascosporogenesis and pathogenesis in F. graminearum.
Localization of FgCak1 to the cytoplasm
Because FgCak1 interacts with both Cdc2A and Cdc2B, we also examined its subcellular localization. The FgCAK1-GFP fusion construct under the control of its native promoter was transformed into the Fgcak1 mutant AK2. The resulting Fgcak1/FgCAK1-GFP transformant AK1-2C was normal in growth and conidiation (Fig 10A), sexual reproduction (Fig 10B), and plant infection (Fig 10C), suggesting that fusion with GFP had no adverse effects on FgCak1 function. In transformant AK1-2C, weak GFP signals were observed in the cytoplasm in conidia, germ tubes, and ascospores (Fig 10D), which is consistent with the localization of Cak1 in the budding yeast [31, 32].
One putative Cdc2-cyclin is up-regulated during plant infection
Based on the phenotypes of the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants, it is likely that F. graminearum has one or more Cdc2A-specific cyclin during plant infection and sexual reproduction. The F. graminearum genome has 17 putative cyclin genes. Based on their orthologs in the budding or fission yeast, three of them, FGSG_00941, FGSG_01291, and FGSG_07132, were predicted to be Cdc2-cyclins (S7A Fig). In comparison with other filamentous fungi, F. graminearum has one additional PCL8/PCL10-like cyclin gene FGSG_07737 (S7A Fig) that lacks a distinct ortholog in the closely related Fusarium species. Based on microarray data available at the PLEXdb database (www.plexdb.org), the expression of all three Cdc2-cyclin genes was down-regulated by 3 days-post-fertilization (dpf) but became up-regulated after 4 dpf (S7B Fig). The expression level of FGSG_07132 was higher at 7 dpf than at 1 dpf, suggesting that it may be important for ascosporogenesis. During barley infection, the expression of FGSG_01291 was up-regulated after 24 hpi, which is the time of infection cushion formation and differentiation of infectious hyphae. Its expression continued to increase until 7 dpi, suggesting that FGSG_01291 plays a more critical role than other Cdc2-cyclins during infectious growth. The expression of the extra cyclin in F. graminearum, FGSG_07737, was relative low during sexual reproduction and decreased during barley infection (S7B Fig). These data indicated that FGSG_07132 and FGSG_01291 may function as CDC2A-specific cyclins during sexual reproduction and plant infection, respectively.
Discussion
CDKs are the central regulators of eukaryotic cell cycle. Although the model yeasts and filamentous fungi used for cell cycle studies have only one mitotic CDK responsible for regulating cell cycle transitions, F. graminearum and other Fusarium species have two CDC2 co-orthologs. The CDC2B sequences from Fusarium species form a monophyletic clade and their relationship is consistent with the species phylogeny [33]. However, the CDC2B clade clusters specifically with F. solani CDC2A rather than forms a sister group to the entire CDC2A clade (S2 Fig), indicating that CDC2B was generated after the divergence of F. solani from the last common ancestor of the other three species. The phylogeny of F. solani CDC2B with that of the other three Fusarium species suggests that the last common ancestor of F. graminearum, F. oxysporum, and F. verticillioides obtained CDC2B from F. solani or its closely related species, likely by horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Recently, it has been shown that horizontal transfer of genes is prevalent in Fusarium species [33, 34].
Cdc2A and Cdc2B share 78% identity in amino acid sequences and likely have similar functions in cell cycle regulation. However, significant type I and type II functional divergence [25, 26] between Cdc2A and Cdc2B was identified (S1 Fig). In addition, the type I functional divergence between Cdc2 proteins of non-Fusarium species (S2 Fig) and Cdc2B, but not Cdc2A, was significant (p = 0.001). Therefore, CDC2A may maintain the primary function of ancestral CDC2 copy whereas CDC2B may have gained novel or modified functions [35]. This inference is consistent with the fact that accelerated sequence evolution occurred in the two ancestral branches leading to CDC2B clade, possibly due to the relaxed purified selection and/or positive selection after HGT.
The CDC2 ortholog in the model yeasts and filamentous fungi is an essential gene [1, 4, 6, 17, 18], reflecting its key regulatory role in cell cycle. However, deletion of either CDC2A or CDC2B had no obvious defects in vegetative growth and conidiation in F. graminearum. The cdc2A and cdc2B deletion mutants also had no detectable difference with the wild type in response to different environmental stresses. Nevertheless, deletion of both of them appears to be lethal. These results indicate that CDC2A and CDC2B must have redundant functions in mitotic cell cycle progression during vegetative growth. The absence of Cdc2A can be fully rescued by Cdc2B and vice versa, which is consistent with their highly conserved amino acid sequences. Cdc2 is known to form heterodimers with cyclins but not with other CDKs in the model yeast and filamentous fungi, which have a single CDC2 gene. In the budding yeast, paralogs often interact with each other [36], which may facilitate the evolution of new functions. It is possible that CDC2B has evolved to control mitotic cell cycle under specific environmental or physical conditions. Unfortunately, the cdc2B deletion mutant had no detectable phenotype.
Unlike their overlapping functions in vegetative growth and asexual reproduction, CDC2A and CDC2B play different roles in sexual reproduction. Whereas the cdc2B mutant was normal, the cdc2A mutant was defective in ascosporogenesis. Most of the asci formed by the cdc2A mutant were aborted in ascospore development. We failed to observe 8-spored asci and rarely observed four-celled ascospores (Fig 2). In F. graminearum, a number of mutants are known to be defective in sexual reproduction [19, 37–41]. For example, mutants blocked in any one of the MAPK pathways are female sterile and defective in perithecium formation [19, 39]. The zif1 and mat1-1-2 mutants produced smaller perithecia that are blocked in ascus development [40, 41]. Among all the protein kinase genes characterized in F. graminearum, the Fgwee1 mutant had similar defects with the cdc2A mutant in ascosporogenesis but it produced smaller perithecia [19]. In S. cerevisiae, Swe1 phosphorylates and inhibits Cdc28 although it is phosphorylated and activated by Cdc28 [42]. They form a stable Swe1-Cdc28 complex to maintain Cdc28 in the inhibited state and play a critical role in controlling the transition into mitosis. In F. graminearum, Cdc2A and its downstream targets during sexual reproduction may be specifically required for ascospore formation after meiosis but not functionally related to the development of ascogenous hyphae and perithecia.
CDC2A also differs from CDC2B in their functions during plant infection. Whereas the cdc2B mutant was as virulent as the wild type, the cdc2A mutant caused only limited necrosis in some of the inoculated kernels. Likely the cdc2B mutant, the cdc2A mutant was normal in stress responses, DON production, and the development of penetration branches. However, the cdc2A but not cdc2B was defective in invasive growth. Infection hyphae formed by the cdc2A mutant had only limited growth and rarely branched. Therefore, Cdc2A may play an essential in regulating cell cycle progression in infectious hyphae and this function of Cdc2A is not replaceable by Cdc2B. Because CDC2B is constitutively expressed, including in infected plant tissues, Cdc2B may have diverged from CDC2A and lost or reduced significantly in its mitotic kinase activity in infectious hyphae after HGT.
Proper regulation of cell cycle and cytokinesis has been shown to be important for plant infection in M. oryzae and U. maydis [43–45]. In M. oryzae, infectious and vegetative hyphae differ significantly in morphology. The bulbous infectious hyphae are somewhat similar to pseudohyphae formed by yeast species [46]. In F. graminearum, infectious hyphae with distinct morphology also are formed inside plant cells [24, 47]. Therefore, the regulation of cell cycle progression may be different between infectious hyphae and vegetative hyphae grown in cultures. Our data supported this hypothesis because CDC2A and CDC2B have overlapping functions in cell cycle during vegetative growth but only CDC2A is required for infectious growth. Consistent with this observation, the expression level of CDC2A but not that of CDC2B was increased during plant infection. The expression level of CDC2A was also increased during sexual reproduction. In nature, sexual reproduction is closely related to plant infection in F. graminearum because perithecia are formed by hyphae grown in plant debris and ascospores released from perithecia formed on plant debris serve as the primary inoculum.
The subcellular localization of Cdc2/Cdc28 is dynamic and depends on its interacting partners. In the fission yeast, Cdc2 specifically localizes to the nucleus [48]. In the budding yeast, Cdc28 localizes primarily in the cytoplasm but is accumulated in the nucleus in late G1 cells [27, 49]. In A. nidulans, NimX localizes predominantly to the nucleus [50] In F. graminearum, Cdc2A mainly localized to the nucleus and its nuclear localization was enhanced in cells undergoing mitosis. In contrast, Cdc2B is present throughout the cell in conidia, germ tubes, and ascospores. The difference in the localization of Cdc2A and Cdc2B may be related to the difference in their interacting proteins and functions, illustrating the functional diversification of these two CDKs. Nevertheless, when the C-terminal region of CDC2A was replaced with that of CDC2B, the resulting CDC2A/2B-GFP transformant has stronger GFP signals in the nucleus. But it is still defect in plant infection and only partially recovered in ascospore formation. These results suggest that nuclear localization of Cdc2A is not critical for infection and sexual development.
Most of the type I and type II functional divergence sites are located in the N- and C-terminal regions of Cdc2A and Cdc2B (S1 Fig). Consistent with this observation, both the N- and C-terminal regions of Cdc2A are important for its specific role in pathogenesis and ascosporogenesis. The N-terminal region contains the cyclin-binding domain and inhibitory phosphorylation sites [1]. In the budding yeast, binding to cyclins and phosphorylation are known to affect the subcellular localization of Cdc28 [27]. In this study, we found that the N-terminal region of Cdc2A is responsible for its localization to the nucleus (Fig 7). Our results also showed that the inhibitory phosphorylation level of Cdc2A was slightly different from Cdc2B (Fig 8). In U. maydis, inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 is important for plant infection [28]. In F. graminearum, the Fgwee1 mutant also was defective in plant infection. Therefore, it is likely that nuclear localization and functional specificity of Cdc2A is related to its activation by inhibitory phosphorylation or cyclin-binding.
Consistent with the weaker GFP signals, the expression levels of CDC2B-GFP fusion proteins was significantly lower than that of CDC2A-GFP under the control of native promoter (Figs 6B and 8A). While under the control of the same CDC2A promoter, the expression levels of CDC2B/2A-GFP was also significantly lower than that of CDC2A/2B-GFP (Fig 7E). These results suggest that the N-terminal region of CDC2B determined its protein level. However, no significant difference was found between the levels of Cdc2B and that of either CDC2A or CDC2A-GFP (Fig 8A). It is likely that fused with the GFP protein significantly increased the degradation rate of Cdc2B but not Cdc2A.
Both Cdc2A and Cdc2B interact with Cak1, which is encoded by the only CDK kinase gene in F. graminearum. In S. cerevisiae, CAK1 is an essential gene for cell division [51]. In F. graminearum, deletion of FgCAK1 is not lethal. The cak1 mutant shared similar defects with the cdc2A mutant in plant infection, indicating that Cak1 may be responsible for the activation of Cdc2A in infectious hyphae. However, deletion of CAK1 resulted in a significant reduction in growth rate and conidiation. Most likely, Cak1 is involved in the activation of both Cdc2A and Cdc2B for hyphal growth in vitro and asexual reproduction. Nevertheless, unlike the cdc2A cdc2B double mutant, the cak1 mutant is viable. In F. graminearum, Cdc2A and/or Cdc2B may have sufficient residual CDK activities after binding with CDK-cyclins in the absence of FgCak1.
The F. graminearum genome has 17 putative cyclin genes that are conserved in other Sordariomycetes. Although it contains two Cdc2 co-orthologs, F. graminearum has no additional Cdc2-cyclins in comparison with N. crassa, A. nidulans, and yeasts. One of three putative Cdc2-cyclin genes FGSG_01291 is distinctly up-regulated during plant infection. FGSG_01291 is an ortholog of the nimE in A. nidulans [52]. Increased copy number of nimE can lead to increased accumulation of inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylated Cdc2 [52]. Considering the higher level of inhibitory phosphorylation for Cdc2A, it is likely that FGSG_01291 may uniquely or preferentially interact with Cdc2A. Interestingly, F. graminearum has one additional PCL8/PCL10-like gene, FGSG_07737 that lacks distinct orthologs in other filamentous fungi. It will be interesting to determine whether the putative cyclin gene has novel functions in mitotic cell cycle in F. graminearum.
Because it differs from the model yeasts in Cdc2 and Cak1 functions, we also analyzed the evolutionary conservation and divergence of other mitotic kinases in F. graminearum. In comparison with S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, F. graminearum has at least one ortholog of each mitosis related protein kinase genes (S2 Table). One unique feature of F. graminearum is that it has two Aurora kinase genes, FGSG_06959 (named IPL1A) and FGSG_02399 (named IPL1B) (S8A Fig). In mammalian cells, Aurora kinases function as mitotic regulators and play a crucial role in cellular division by controlling chromatid segregation [53]. The budding and fission yeasts have a single Aurora kinase gene that regulates the completion of mitotic events and is essential for viability [54–56]. All the sequenced Sordariomycetes, including F. verticillioides, F. oxysporum, and F. solani, have a single Aurora-like gene (S8A Fig). In mammalian cells, Aurora-A and Aurora-B have distinct subcellular localization and function [57–60]. However, when the G198 residue of Aurora-A was replaced with the equivalent N142 residue of Aurora-B, Aurora-AG198N had similar subcellular localization and functions with Aurora-B [61]. In F. graminearum, at the position equivalent to G198 of Aurora-A, Ipl1A has a G residue but Ipl1B has an S residue (S8B Fig). It is possible that Ipl1A and Ipl1B function similarly to Aurora-A and Aurora-B.
Overall, our studies with CDC2A and CDC2B indicate that F. graminearum may differ from S. cerevisiae and other model fungi in the regulatory mechanism of mitotic cell cycle. Consistent with this observation, F. graminearum has two putative Aurora kinase genes that regulate chromatid segregation. Furthermore, we found that a number of putative mitotic kinase genes also may differ in functions between F. graminearum and S. cerevisiae. Similar to CDC2 and CAK1, the DBF2/DBF20, CDC15, MEC1, and RAD53 genes are essential in S. cerevisiae. In F. graminearum, the Fgdbf2, Fgcdc15 and Fgmec1 mutants were viable but significantly reduced in virulence [19]. The KIN3 ortholog was essential in F. graminearum but the yeast kin3 deletion mutant is viable [62]. These observations further indicate that F. graminearum differs from the model yeasts in the function of several mitotic kinase genes. Like in other plant pathogens [43–45], cell cycle progression may be regulated differently in vegetative and infectious hyphae of F. graminearum.
Materials and Methods
Strains, culture conditions, and phenotype assays
The wild-type strain PH-1 of F. graminearum and its derived transformants used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were routinely cultured on PDA plates at 25°C for growth and in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) medium for conidiation as described [63]. Growth rate was measured with race tube cultures (PDA) after incubating at 25°C for 10 days. Conidiation was assayed with 5-day-old CMC cultures. The experiments for growth rate and conidiation were totally repeated for 3 times with 3 repetitions for each time. For DNA extraction, vegetative hyphae were harvested from 2-day-old YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose) cultures. For sexual reproduction, aerial hyphae of 7-day-old carrot agar cultures were pressed down with 300 μl of 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated under black light [64]. Perithecium formation and cirrhi production were assayed after incubation at 25°C for 2 weeks. For plant infection assays, freshly harvested conidia were re-suspended to 105 spores/ml and used to inoculate flowering wheat heads of cultivar Xiaoyan22 or Norm and stalks of 8-week-old corn plants of cv. Pioneer 2375 as described [41]. Wheat spikelets with typical symptoms were examined 14 days post-inoculation (dpi) and stalk rot symptoms were examined after splitting corn stalks longitudinally along the inoculation site 14 dpi. DON production was assayed with rice grain cultures [22] and liquid trichothecene biosynthesis induction (TBI) media containing 5 mM arginine as previously described [23, 65] with minor modification.
Targeted deletion CDC2A in the cdc2B mutant and vice versa
The CDC2A and CDC2B gene replacement constructs were generated with the split-marker approach using the neomycin resistance gene (NEOR) as the selectable marker. Protoplasts of the cdc2A and cdc2B mutants were prepared and transformed with the CDC2B and CDC2A gene replacement constructs as described previously [21, 39]. For transformant selection, hygromycin B (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and geneticin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added to the final concentration of 250 and 150 mg/ml, respectively [66].
Generation of CDC2A-, CDC2B-, and FgCAK1-GFP fusion constructs and transformants
To generate the GFP fusion constructs, genomic fragments containing the promoter and coding region of the target genes were amplified and cloned into pFL2 vector by the yeast gap repair approach [67]. The resulting in-frame GFP fusion constructs of CDC2A, CDC2B, and FgCAK1 were confirmed by DNA sequencing and transformed into protoplasts of the corresponding mutants. The resulting transformants harboring the fusion construct were identified by PCR and further confirmed by the presence of GFP signals. GFP signals in conidia, germ tubes, ascospores and infectious hyphae were observed with a BX51 Olympus epifluorescence microscope or an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33258 (Beyotime, China).
Generation of CDC2A-CDC2B chimeric constructs and transformants
Based on the sequence alignment of Cdc2 orthologs (S1 Fig), we divided Cdc2A and Cdc2B into the N- and C-terminal regions as depicted in Fig 7A and S1 Fig. We generated CDC2A/B and CDC2B/A chimeric alleles under the control of the CDC2A promoter by replacement of the N- or C-terminal regions of CDC2A with those of CDC2B by the yeast GAP repair approach [67, 68], respectively. The resulting chimeric CDC2A/B-GFP and CDC2B/A-GFP constructs were verified by sequencing analysis and transformed into the cdc2A mutant. The resulting cdc2A CDC2A/2B or cdc2A CDC2B/2A transformants were confirmed by PCR and observation of GFP signals.
Assays for penetration branches and infectious hyphae
For penetration branches observation, glumes and lemmas were collected from inoculated wheat spikelets 24 h post-inoculation (hpi), and fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) overnight at 4°C [69]. After dehydration in a series of 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100% acetone, the samples were coated with gold-palladium and examined with a JEOL 6360 scanning electron microscope (SEM) as described [69]. For assaying infectious hyphae, three-day-old seedlings of wheat cultivar Norm were inoculated as described [56]. In brief, the top 2 to 3 mm of the coleoptiles were removed with a razor blade and the wounded seedlings were wrapped in 4 mm X 1 cm cotton strips soaked with F. graminearum conidia (105 spores/ml). After inoculation, the seedlings were grown at 25°C in a growth chamber with 95% humidity and examined at 48 or 72 hpi with a BX51 Olympus epifluorescence microscope. The experiments were repeated at least 3 times. In each experiment, we examined at least ten samples for each strain.
Assays for the expression levels of CDC2A and CDC2B
RNA samples were isolated from germlings, vegetative hyphae, mating cultures, and infected wheat heads with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as described [41]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with the Fermentas 1st cDNA synthesis kit (Hanover, MD) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Relative expression levels of CDC2A and CDC2B were assayed by qRT-PCR with the FgTUB2 beta-tubulin gene of F. graminearum [65] as the internal control. For each sample, at least three independent biological replicates were analyzed to calculate mean and standard deviation.
Yeast two-hybrid assays
The interactions of FgCak1 with Cdc2A and Cdc2B were assayed with the Matchmaker yeast two-hybrid system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). The ORFs of CDC2A and CDC2B were amplified from first-strand cDNA of PH-1 synthesized as described [70] and cloned into pGBKT7 (Clontech) as the bait constructs. The ORF of FgCAK1 was amplified and cloned into pGADT7 as the prey construct. The resulting bait and prey vectors were co-transformed in pairs into yeast strain AH109 (Clontech). To check for auto-activation, the bait construct of CDC2A and CDC2B were co-transformed with empty pGADT7 vector. The resulting transformants were then assayed for growth on synthetic dropout (SD) medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (SD-Trp-Leu-His) and β-galactosidase activities as described [71].
Co-IP assays
The CDC2A- and CDC2B-GFP fusion constructs were generated by cloning genomic fragments containing the open reading frame (ORF) of these two genes into pFL2 by the yeast gap repair approach [67, 68]. Similar approaches were used to generate the 3xFLAG fusion constructs for the FgCAK1 and CDC2B genes using the PFL7 vector. The resulting fusion constructs were confirmed by sequencing analysis and transformed in pairs into PH-1. The expression of both transforming vectors was analyzed by PCR and western blot analysis. Total proteins were isolated from strains expressing both transforming constructs and incubated with anti-Flag M2 beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as described [19]. Western blots of total proteins and proteins eluted from anti-Flag M2 beads were detected with anti-GFP (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-Histone H3 (Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies as described [72].
Phosphorylation assays with Cdc2A and Cdc2B
Total proteins were isolated in the presence of phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) from 18 h germlings grown in liquid complete medium (CM) cultures, separated on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes as described [67]. For western blot analysis, the expression of Cdc2A and Cdc2B was detected with the Cdc2 p34 (PSTAIRE) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The inhibitory phosphorylation level of Cdc2 proteins was detected with the Phospho-Cdc2 (Tyr15) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).
Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis
Multiple alignments of protein sequences were constructed with COBALT (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/cobalt) and manually modified. The analysis of type I and type II functional divergence was performed with the Diverge 3.0 software [73]. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenies were estimated with PhyML3.0 [74] assuming 8 categories of γ-distributed substitution rate and SPRs algorithms. For phylogeny of protein sequences, the best-fit model for each datasets selected by ProtTest2.4 [75] was used. The reliability of internal branches was evaluated based on SH-aLRT supports.
Accession numbers
Cyclin-dependent protein kinase Cdc2A (Gene ID: FGSG_08468, GenBank accession no.: XP_011320297.1), Cyclin-dependent protein kinase Cdc2B (FGSG_03132, XP_011322636.1), Cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase FgCak1 (FGSG_04947, XP_011323418.1), Aurora kinase Ipl1A (FGSG_06959, XP_011326636.1), Aurora kinase Ipl1B (FGSG_02399, XP_011318314.1), DNA damage response protein kinase FgRad53 (FGSG_00433, XP_011316100.1), Mitosis entry checkpoint protein kinase FgMec1 (FGSG_13318, XP_011320055.1), Transcription and stress response protein kinase FgDbf2 (FGSG_08635, XP_011320108.1), Mitotic exit network protein kinase FgCdc15 (FGSG_10381, XP_011319350.1), M phase inhibitor protein kinase FgWee1 (FGSG_10228, XP_011319176.1), three putative Cdc2-cyclins (FGSG_00941, XP_011316682.1; FGSG_07132, XP_011326840.1; FGSG_01291, XP_011317073.1), PCL8/PCL10-like cyclin (FGSG_07737, XP_011327546.1).
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. Morgan DO (1997) Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13: 261–291. 9442875
2. Ubersax JA, Woodbury EL, Quang PN, Paraz M, Blethrow JD, et al. (2003) Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425: 859–864. 14574415
3. Liu J, Kipreos ET (2000) Evolution of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and CDK-activating kinases (CAKs): differential conservation of CAKs in yeast and metazoa. Mol Biol Evol 17: 1061–1074. 10889219
4. Morgan DO (2007) The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control: London: New Science Press.
5. Humphrey T, Pearce A (2005) Cell cycle molecules and mechanisms of the budding and fission yeasts. Methods Mol Biol 296: 3–29. 15576924
6. Malumbres M, Barbacid M (2007) Cell cycle kinases in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 60–65. 17208431
7. Booher R, Beach D (1986) Site-specific mutagenesis of cdc2+, a cell cycle control gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol 6: 3523–3530. 3796591
8. Mendenhall MD, Hodge AE (1998) Regulation of Cdc28 cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 1191–1243. 9841670
9. Ferrari S (2006) Protein kinases controlling the onset of mitosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 781–795. 16465440
10. Ma HT, Poon RY (2011) How protein kinases co-ordinate mitosis in animal cells. Biochem J 435: 17–31. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100284 21406064
11. Nigg EA (2001) Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 21–32. 11413462
12. Schmit TL, Ahmad N (2007) Regulation of mitosis via mitotic kinases: new opportunities for cancer management. Mol Cancer Ther 6: 1920–1931. 17620424
13. Saiz JE, Fisher RP (2002) A CDK-activating kinase network is required in cell cycle control and transcription in fission yeast. Curr Biol 12: 1100–1105. 12121616
14. Espinoza FH, Farrell A, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Morgan DO (1996) A cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase (CAK) in budding yeast unrelated to vertebrate CAK. Science 273: 1714–1717. 8781234
15. Park G, Servin JA, Turner GE, Altamirano L, Colot HV, et al. (2011) Global analysis of serine-threonine protein kinase genes in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 10: 1553–1564. doi: 10.1128/EC.05140-11 21965514
16. De Souza CP, Hashmi SB, Osmani AH, Andrews P, Ringelberg CS, et al. (2013) Functional analysis of the Aspergillus nidulans kinome. PLoS One 8: e58008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058008 23505451
17. Osmani AH, van Peij N, Mischke M, O'Connell MJ, Osmani SA (1994) A single p34cdc2 protein kinase (encoded by nimXcdc2) is required at G1 and G2 in Aspergillus nidulans. J Cell Sci 107 (Pt 6): 1519–1528. 7962194
18. Borkovich KA, Alex LA, Yarden O, Freitag M, Turner GE, et al. (2004) Lessons from the genome sequence of Neurospora crassa: tracing the path from genomic blueprint to multicellular organism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 1–108. 15007097
19. Wang C, Zhang S, Hou R, Zhao Z, Zheng Q, et al. (2011) Functional analysis of the kinome of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002460. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002460 22216007
20. Tsuchiy D, Lacefield S (2013) Cdk1 modulation ensures the coordination of cell-cycle events during the switch from meiotic prophase to mitosis. Current Biology 23: 1505–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.031 23871241
21. Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995;8(4):593–601. Epub 1995/07/01. 8589414.
22. Seo JA, Kim JC, Lee DH, Lee YW. Variation in 8-ketotrichothecenes and zearalenone production by Fusarium graminearum isolates from corn and barley in Korea. Mycopathologia. 1996;134(1):31–7. doi: 10.1007/Bf00437050 20882466
23. Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Manners JM. Nutrient profiling reveals potent inducers of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2009;46(8):604–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.04.004 19406250
24. Zhang XW, Jia LJ, Zhang Y, Jiang G, Li X, et al. (2012) In planta stage-specific fungal gene profiling elucidates the molecular strategies of Fusarium graminearum growing inside wheat coleoptiles. Plant Cell 24: 5159–5176. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105957 23266949
25. Gu X (2006) A simple statistical method for estimating type-II (cluster-specific) functional divergence of protein sequences. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1937–1945. 16864604
26. Gu X (1999) Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1664–1674. 10605109
27. Wang H, Gari E, Verges E, Gallego C, Aldea M (2004) Recruitment of Cdc28 by Whi3 restricts nuclear accumulation of the G1 cyclin-Cdk complex to late G1. EMBO J 23: 180–190. 14685274
28. Sgarlata C, Perez-Martin J (2005) Inhibitory phosphorylation of a mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase regulates the morphogenesis, cell size and virulence of the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. J Cell Sci 118: 3607–3622. 16046476
29. Booher RN, Deshaies RJ, Kirschner MW (1993) Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. EMBO J 12: 3417–3426. 8253069
30. Norbury C, Blow J, Nurse P (1991) Regulatory phosphorylation of the p34cdc2 protein kinase in vertebrates. EMBO J 10: 3321–3329. 1655417
31. Kaldis P, Pitluk ZW, Bany IA, Enke DA, Wagner M, Winter E, et al. Localization and regulation of the cdk-activating kinase (Cak1p) from budding yeast. J Cell Sci. 1998;111 (Pt 24):3585–96. Epub 1998/11/20. 9819350.
32. Kaldis P. The cdk-activating kinase (CAK): from yeast to mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55(2):284–96. Epub 1999/04/03. 10188587.
33. Ma LJ, van der Does HC, Borkovich KA, Coleman JJ, Daboussi MJ, et al. (2010) Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature 464: 367–373. doi: 10.1038/nature08850 20237561
34. Coleman JJ, Rounsley SD, Rodriguez-Carres M, Kuo A, Wasmann CC, et al. (2009) The genome of Nectria haematococca: contribution of supernumerary chromosomes to gene expansion. PLoS Genet 5: e1000618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000618 19714214
35. Conant GC, Wolfe KH (2008) Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet 9: 938–950. doi: 10.1038/nrg2482 19015656
36. Presser A, Elowitz MB, Kellis M, Kishony R (2008) The evolutionary dynamics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction network after duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 950–954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707293105 18199840
37. Son H, Lee J, Lee Y-W (2013) A novel gene, GEA1, is required for ascus cell-wall development in the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology 159: 1077–1085. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064287-0 23619001
38. Son H, Seo YS, Min K, Park AR, Lee J, et al. (2011) A phenome-based functional analysis of transcription factors in the cereal head blight fungus, Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002310. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002310 22028654
39. Hou Z, Xue C, Peng Y, Katan T, Kistler HC, et al. (2002) A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15: 1119–1127. 12423017
40. Wang Y, Liu W, Hou Z, Wang C, Zhou X, et al. (2011) A novel transcriptional factor important for pathogenesis and ascosporogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24: 118–128. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-10-0129 20795857
41. Zheng Q, Hou R, Juanyu, Zhang, Ma J, et al. (2013) The MAT locus genes play different roles in sexual reproduction and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One 8: e66980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066980 23826182
42. Harvey SL, Charlet A, Haas W, Gygi SP, Kellogg DR (2005) Cdk1-dependent regulation of the mitotic inhibitor Wee1. Cell 122: 407–420. 16096060
43. Perez-Martin J, Castillo-Lluva S, Sgarlata C, Flor-Parra I, Mielnichuk N, et al. (2006) Pathocycles: Ustilago maydis as a model to study the relationships between cell cycle and virulence in pathogenic fungi. Mol Genet Genomics 276: 211–229. 16896795
44. Saunders DG, Aves SJ, Talbot NJ (2010) Cell cycle-mediated regulation of plant infection by the rice blast fungus. Plant Cell 22: 497–507. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072447 20190078
45. Veneault-Fourrey C, Barooah M, Egan M, Wakley G, Talbot NJ (2006) Autophagic fungal cell death is necessary for infection by the rice blast fungus. Science 312: 580–583. 16645096
46. Bourett TM, Howard RJ (1990) In vitro development of penetration structures in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 329–342.
47. Rittenour WR, Harris SD (2010) An in vitro method for the analysis of infection-related morphogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Pathol 11: 361–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00609.x 20447284
48. Booher RN, Alfa CE, Hyams JS, Beach DH (1989) The fission yeast cdc2/cdc13/suc1 protein kinase: regulation of catalytic activity and nuclear localization. Cell 58: 485. 2569363
49. Wittenberg C, Richardson SL, Reed SI (1987) Subcellular localization of a protein kinase required for cell cycle initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for an association between the CDC28 gene product and the insoluble cytoplasmic matrix. J Cell Biol 105: 1527–1538. 3312233
50. Wu L, Osmani SA, Mirabito PM (1998) A role for NIMA in the nuclear localization of cyclin B in Aspergillus nidulans. J Cell Biol 141: 1575–1587. 9647650
51. Bordon-Pallier F, Jullian N, Ferrari P, Girard AM, Bocquel MT, et al. (2004) Inhibitors of Civ1 kinase belonging to 6-aminoaromatic-2-cyclohexyldiamino purine series as potent anti-fungal compounds. Biochim Biophys Acta 1697: 211–223. 15023362
52. Oconnell MJ, Osmani AH, Morris NR, Osmani SA. An Extra Copy of Nimecyclinb Elevates Pre-Mpf Levels and Partially Suppresses Mutation of Nimtcdc25 in Aspergillus-Nidulans. Embo Journal. 1992;11(6):2139–49. 1534750
53. Carmena M, Earnshaw WC (2003) The cellular geography of aurora kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 842–854. 14625535
54. Chan CS, Botstein D (1993) Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics 135: 677–691. 8293973
55. Petersen J, Paris J, Willer M, Philippe M, Hagan IM (2001) The S. pombe aurora-related kinase Ark1 associates with mitotic structures in a stage dependent manner and is required for chromosome segregation. J Cell Sci 114: 4371–4384. 11792803
56. Leverson JD, Huang HK, Forsburg SL, Hunter T (2002) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe aurora-related kinase Ark1 interacts with the inner centromere protein Pic1 and mediates chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1132–1143. 11950927
57. Marumoto T, Zhang D, Saya H (2005) Aurora-A—a guardian of poles. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 42–50. 15630414
58. Barr AR, Gergely F (2007) Aurora-A: the maker and breaker of spindle poles. J Cell Sci 120: 2987–2996. 17715155
59. Vader G, Medema RH, Lens SM (2006) The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. J Cell Biol 173: 833–837. 16769825
60. Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC (2007) Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 798–812. 17848966
61. Fu J, Bian M, Liu J, Jiang Q, Zhang C (2009) A single amino acid change converts Aurora-A into Aurora-B-like kinase in terms of partner specificity and cellular function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6939–6944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900833106 19357306
62. Schweitzer B, Philippsen P (1992) NPK1, a nonessential protein kinase gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with similarity to Aspergillus nidulans nimA. Mol Gen Genet 234: 164–167. 1495480
63. Leslie JF, and Summerell B. A.. (2006) The Fusarium laboratory manual: Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
64. Zheng D, Zhang S, Zhou X, Wang C, Xiang P, et al. (2012) The FgHOG1 pathway regulates hyphal growth, stress responses, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One 7: e49495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049495 23166686
65. Bluhm BH, Zhao X, Flaherty JE, Xu JR, Dunkle LD (2007) RAS2 regulates growth and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20: 627–636. 17555271
66. Wang G, Wang C, Hou R, Zhou X, Li G, et al. (2012) The AMT1 arginine methyltransferase gene is important for plant infection and normal hyphal growth in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One 7: e38324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038324 22693618
67. Bruno KS, Tenjo F, Li L, Hamer JE, Xu JR (2004) Cellular localization and role of kinase activity of PMK1 in Magnaporthe grisea. Eukaryot Cell 3: 1525–1532. 15590826
68. Zhou X, Xu JR (2011) Efficient approaches for generating GFP fusion and epitope-tagging constructs in filamentous fungi. In: Xu JR, Bluhm B, editors. Fungal Genomics: Methods and Protocols. Heidelberg: Humana Press. pp. 199–212.
69. Hu S, Zhou X, Gu X, Cao S, Wang C, et al. (2014) The cAMP-PKA pathway regulates growth, sexual and asexual differentiation, and pathogenesis in Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27: 557–566. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-13-0306-R 24450772
70. Zhou X, Zhang H, Li G, Shaw B, Xu JR (2012) The Cyclase-associated protein Cap1 is important for proper regulation of infection-related morphogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002911. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002911 22969430
71. Zhou X, Liu W, Wang C, Xu Q, Wang Y, et al. (2011) A MADS-box transcription factor MoMcm1 is required for male fertility, microconidium production and virulence in Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol Microbiol 80: 33–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07556.x 21276092
72. Liu W, Zhou X, Li G, Li L, Kong L, et al. (2011) Multiple plant surface signals are sensed by different mechanisms in the rice blast fungus for appressorium formation. PLoS Pathog 7: e1001261. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001261 21283781
73. Gu X, Zou Y, Su Z, Huang W, Zhou Z, et al. (2013) An update of DIVERGE software for functional divergence analysis of protein family. Mol Biol Evol 30: 1713–1719. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst069 23589455
74. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59: 307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 20525638
75. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D (2005) ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21: 2104–2105. 15647292
76. Cuomo CA, Guldener U, Xu JR, Trail F, Turgeon BG, et al. (2007) The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science 317: 1400–1402. 17823352
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2015 Číslo 6
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- HIV Latency Is Established Directly and Early in Both Resting and Activated Primary CD4 T Cells
- A 21st Century Perspective of Poliovirus Replication
- Adenovirus Tales: From the Cell Surface to the Nuclear Pore Complex
- Battling Phages: How Bacteria Defend against Viral Attack