DNA supercoiling differences in bacteria result from disparate DNA gyrase activation by polyamines
Autoři:
Alexandre Duprey aff001; Eduardo A. Groisman aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
aff001; Yale Microbial Sciences Institute, West Haven, CT, United States of America
aff002
Vyšlo v časopise:
DNA supercoiling differences in bacteria result from disparate DNA gyrase activation by polyamines. PLoS Genet 16(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009085
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009085
Souhrn
DNA supercoiling is essential for all living cells because it controls all processes involving DNA. In bacteria, global DNA supercoiling results from the opposing activities of topoisomerase I, which relaxes DNA, and DNA gyrase, which compacts DNA. These enzymes are widely conserved, sharing >91% amino acid identity between the closely related species Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Why, then, do E. coli and Salmonella exhibit different DNA supercoiling when experiencing the same conditions? We now report that this surprising difference reflects disparate activation of their DNA gyrases by the polyamine spermidine and its precursor putrescine. In vitro, Salmonella DNA gyrase activity was sensitive to changes in putrescine concentration within the physiological range, whereas activity of the E. coli enzyme was not. In vivo, putrescine activated the Salmonella DNA gyrase and spermidine the E. coli enzyme. High extracellular Mg2+ decreased DNA supercoiling exclusively in Salmonella by reducing the putrescine concentration. Our results establish the basis for the differences in global DNA supercoiling between E. coli and Salmonella, define a signal transduction pathway regulating DNA supercoiling, and identify potential targets for antibacterial agents.
Klíčová slova:
DNA – Gel electrophoresis – Gene expression – Oat – Reproductive physiology – Salmonella – Salmonella typhimurium – DNA purification
Zdroje
1. Stuger R, Woldringh CL, Weijden CC van der, Vischer NOE, Bakker BM, Spanning RJM van, et al. DNA Supercoiling by Gyrase is Linked to Nucleoid Compaction. Mol Biol Rep. 2002;29:79–82. doi: 10.1023/a:1020318705894 12241080
2. Pruss GJ, Drlica K. DNA supercoiling and prokaryotic transcription. Cell. 1989;56:521–523. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90574-6 2645054
3. Dorman CJ. DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:26. doi: 10.1186/s12860-019-0211-6 31319794
4. Dunaway M, Ostrander EA. Local domains of supercoiling activate a eukaryotic promoter in vivo. Nature. 1993;361:746–748. doi: 10.1038/361746a0 8441472
5. Higgins NP. Measuring In Vivo Supercoil Dynamics and Transcription Elongation Rates in Bacterial Chromosomes. The Bacterial Nucleoid. Humana Press, New York, NY; 2017. pp. 17–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7098-8_2 28842872
6. Benjamin KR, Abola PA, Kanaar R, Cozzarelli NR. Contributions of Supercoiling to Tn3 Resolvase and Phage Mu Gin Site-specific Recombination. J Mol Biol. 1996;256:50–65. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0067 8609613
7. Carteau S, Mouscadet JF, Goulaouic H, Subra F, Auclair C. Effect of Topoisomerase Inhibitors on the in Vitro HIV DNA Integration Reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;192:1409–1414. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1573 8389550
8. Holmes VF, Cozzarelli NR. Closing the ring: Links between SMC proteins and chromosome partitioning, condensation, and supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:1322–1324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040576797 10677457
9. Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:369–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369 11395412
10. Pedro-Botet ML, Yu VL. Treatment strategies for Legionella infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:1109–1121. doi: 10.1517/14656560902900820 19405787
11. Zechiedrich EL, Khodursky AB, Bachellier S, Schneider R, Chen D, Lilley DMJ, et al. Roles of Topoisomerases in Maintaining Steady-state DNA Supercoiling in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8103–8113. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.8103 10713132
12. Gilbert N, Allan J. Supercoiling in DNA and chromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;25:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.013 24584092
13. Verma SC, Qian Z, Adhya SL. Architecture of the Escherichia coli nucleoid. PLoS Genet. 2019;15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008456 31830036
14. Gellert M, Mizuuchi K, O’Dea MH, Nash HA. DNA gyrase: an enzyme that introduces superhelical turns into DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1976;73:3872–3876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3872 186775
15. Shah P, Swiatlo E. A multifaceted role for polyamines in bacterial pathogens. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:4–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06126.x 18405343
16. Noble CG, Maxwell A. The Role of GyrB in the DNA Cleavage-religation Reaction of DNA Gyrase: A Proposed Two Metal-ion Mechanism. J Mol Biol. 2002;318:361–371. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00049-9 12051843
17. Basu A, Parente AC, Bryant Z. Structural Dynamics and Mechanochemical Coupling in DNA Gyrase. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:1833–1845. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.016 27016205
18. Wang JC. Interaction between DNA and an Escherichia coli protein omega. J Mol Biol. 1971;55:523–533. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90334-2 4927945
19. Nitiss JL, Soans E, Rogojina A, Seth A, Mishina M. Topoisomerase Assays. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2012;CHAPTER: Unit3.3. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph0303s57 22684721
20. Tse-Dinh Y-C, Beran RK. Multiple promoters for transcription of the Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I gene and their regulation by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1988;202:735–742. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90554-2 2845101
21. Michael AJ. Polyamines in Eukaryotes, Bacteria, and Archaea. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:14896–14903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.734780 27268252
22. Gevrekci AÖ. The roles of polyamines in microorganisms. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:204. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2370-y 29080149
23. Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. Polyamine Modulon in Escherichia coli: Genes Involved in the Stimulation of Cell Growth by Polyamines. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2006;139:11–16. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvj020 16428314
24. Tabor CW, Tabor H. Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1985;49:81–99.
25. Jung IL, Kim IG. Polyamines and Glutamate Decarboxylase-based Acid Resistance in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:22846–22852. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212055200 12670930
26. Tkachenko AG, Akhova AV, Shumkov MS, Nesterova LY. Polyamines reduce oxidative stress in Escherichia coli cells exposed to bactericidal antibiotics. Res Microbiol. 2012;163:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.10.009 22138596
27. Brickman TJ, Armstrong SK. The ornithine decarboxylase gene odc is required for alcaligin siderophore biosynthesis in Bordetella spp.: putrescine is a precursor of alcaligin. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:54–60. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.1.54-60.1996 8550442
28. Jelsbak L, Thomsen LE, Wallrodt I, Jensen PR, Olsen JE. Polyamines Are Required for Virulence in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e36149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036149 22558361
29. Parra-Lopez C, Baer MT, Groisman EA. Molecular genetic analysis of a locus required for resistance to antimicrobial peptides in Salmonella typhimurium. EMBO J. 1993;12:4053–4062. 8223423
30. Rovinskiy NS, Agbleke AA, Chesnokova ON, Higgins NP. Supercoil Levels in E. coli and Salmonella Chromosomes Are Regulated by the C-Terminal 35–38 Amino Acids of GyrA. Microorganisms. 2019;7:81. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7030081 30875939
31. Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Naushad S, Gupta RS. Genome based phylogeny and taxonomy of the “Enterobacteriales”: proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016 [cited 22 Sep 2016]. Available: http://ijs.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001485?crawler=true
32. Webber MA, Buckner MMC, Redgrave LS, Ifill G, Mitchenall LA, Webb C, et al. Quinolone-resistant gyrase mutants demonstrate decreased susceptibility to triclosan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:2755–2763. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx201 29091182
33. Champion K, Higgins NP. Growth Rate Toxicity Phenotypes and Homeostatic Supercoil Control Differentiate Escherichia coli from Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:5839–5849. doi: 10.1128/JB.00083-07 17400739
34. Vetcher AA, McEwen AE, Abujarour R, Hanke A, Levene SD. Gel mobilities of linking-number topoisomers and their dependence on DNA helical repeat and elasticity. Biophys Chem. 2010;148:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.016 20346570
35. Tabor CW, Tabor H, Xie QW. Spermidine synthase of Escherichia coli: localization of the speE gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1986;83:6040–6044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.6040 3526348
36. Charlier D, Bervoets I. Regulation of arginine biosynthesis, catabolism and transport in Escherichia coli. Amino Acids. 2019;51:1103–1127. doi: 10.1007/s00726-019-02757-8 31267155
37. McClelland M, Sanderson KE, Spieth J, Clifton SW, Latreille P, Courtney L, et al. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature. 2001;413:852–856. doi: 10.1038/35101614 11677609
38. Sugiyama Y, Nakamura A, Matsumoto M, Kanbe A, Sakanaka M, Higashi K, et al. A Novel Putrescine Exporter SapBCDF of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:26343–26351. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.762450 27803167
39. Husna AU, Wang N, Cobbold SA, Newton HJ, Hocking DM, Wilksch JJ, et al. Methionine biosynthesis and transport are functionally redundant for the growth and virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium. J Biol Chem. 2018; jbc.RA118.002592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002592 29720401
40. Alatossava T, Jütte H, Kuhn A, Kellenberger E. Manipulation of intracellular magnesium content in polymyxin B nonapeptide-sensitized Escherichia coli by ionophore A23187. J Bacteriol. 1985;162:413–419. doi: 10.1128/JB.162.1.413-419.1985 2984182
41. Fang S-B, Huang C-J, Huang C-H, Wang K-C, Chang N-W, Pan H-Y, et al. speG Is Required for Intracellular Replication of Salmonella in Various Human Cells and Affects Its Polyamine Metabolism and Global Transcriptomes. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02245 29187844
42. Miyamoto S, Kashiwagi K, Ito K, Watanabe S, Igarashi K. Estimation of Polyamine Distribution and Polyamine Stimulation of Protein Synthesis in Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;300:63–68. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1009 7678729
43. Romani AM, Scarpa A. Regulation of cellular magnesium. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr. 2000;5:D720–734. doi: 10.2741/romani 10922296
44. Rowatt E, Williams RJP. The binding of polyamines and magnesium to DNA. J Inorg Biochem. 1992;46:87–97. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(92)80012-k 1522415
45. Kongsoi S, Yokoyama K, Suprasert A, Utrarachkij F, Nakajima C, Suthienkul O, et al. Characterization of Salmonella Typhimurium DNA gyrase as a target of quinolones. Drug Test Anal. 2015;7:714–720. doi: 10.1002/dta.1744 25381884
46. Workum M, Dooren SJ, Oldenburg N, Molenaar D, Jensen PR, Snoep JL, et al. DNA supercoiling depends on the phosphorylation potential in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996;20:351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02622.x 8733233
47. Kurihara S, Suzuki H, Oshida M, Benno Y. A Novel Putrescine Importer Required for Type 1 Pili-driven Surface Motility Induced by Extracellular Putrescine in Escherichia coli K-12. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:10185–10192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.176032 21266585
48. Michael AJ. Polyamine function in archaea and bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2018; jbc.TM118.005670. doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.005670 30254075
49. Duprey A, Reverchon S, Nasser W. Bacterial virulence and Fis: adapting regulatory networks to the host environment. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.008 24370464
50. Colgan AM, Quinn HJ, Kary SC, Mitchenall LA, Maxwell A, Cameron ADS, et al. Negative supercoiling of DNA by gyrase is inhibited in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium during adaptation to acid stress. Mol Microbiol. 2018;107:734–746. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13911 29352745
51. Pomares MF, Corbalán NS, Adler C, de Cristóbal R, Farías RN, Delgado MA, et al. Macrophage environment turns otherwise MccJ25-resistant Salmonella into sensitive. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-95 23634875
52. Duprey A, Nasser W, Léonard S, Brochier-Armanet C, Reverchon S. Transcriptional start site turnover in the evolution of bacterial paralogous genes–the pelE-pelD virulence genes in Dickeya. FEBS J. 2016;283:4192–4207. doi: 10.1111/febs.13921 27727510
53. Chen HD, Jewett MW, Groisman EA. Ancestral Genes Can Control the Ability of Horizontally Acquired Loci to Confer New Traits. PLOS Genet. 2011;7:e1002184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002184 21811415
54. Maxwell A. DNA gyrase as a drug target. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5:102–109. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(96)10085-8 9080608
55. Rubinstein E. History of Quinolones and Their Side Effects. Chemotherapy. 2001;47:3–8. doi: 10.1159/000057838 11549783
56. WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance, World Health Organization. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine: ranking of antimicrobial agents for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use. 2017. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255027/1/9789241512220-eng.pdf
57. Shapiro A, Jahic H, Prasad S, Ehmann D, Thresher J, Gao N, et al. A Homogeneous, High-Throughput Fluorescence Anisotropy-Based DNA Supercoiling Assay. J Biomol Screen. 2010;15:1088–1098. doi: 10.1177/1087057110378624 20930214
58. Galán JE, Curtiss R. Expression of Salmonella typhimurium genes required for invasion is regulated by changes in DNA supercoiling. Infect Immun. 1990;58:1879–1885. doi: 10.1128/IAI.58.6.1879-1885.1990 2160435
59. Ó Cróinín T, Carroll RK, Kelly A, Dorman CJ. Roles for DNA supercoiling and the Fis protein in modulating expression of virulence genes during intracellular growth of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62:869–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05416.x 16999831
60. Datta S, Costantino N, Court DL. A set of recombineering plasmids for gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 2006;379:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.04.018 16750601
61. Davis RW, Botstein D, Roth JR. Advanced Bacterial Genetics: A Manual for Genetic Engineering. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pr; 1980.
62. Snavely MD, Miller CG, Maguire ME. The mgtB Mg2+ transport locus of Salmonella typhimurium encodes a P-type ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:815–823. 1824701
63. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 22388286
64. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 22383036
65. Carvajal N, López V, Salas M, Uribe E, Herrera P, Cerpa J. Manganese Is Essential for Catalytic Activity ofEscherichia coliAgmatinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;258:808–811. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0709 10329468
66. Ngo TT, Brillhart KL, Davis RH, Wong RC, Bovaird JH, Digangi JJ, et al. Spectrophotometric assay for ornithine decarboxylase. Anal Biochem. 1987;160:290–293. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90049-2 3578755
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 10
- S diagnostikou Parkinsonovy nemoci může nově pomoci AI nástroj pro hodnocení mrkacího reflexu
- Proč při poslechu některé muziky prostě musíme tančit?
- Chůze do schodů pomáhá prodloužit život a vyhnout se srdečním chorobám
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- „Jednohubky“ z klinického výzkumu – 2024/44
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Evaluation of both exonic and intronic variants for effects on RNA splicing allows for accurate assessment of the effectiveness of precision therapies
- RNA-directed DNA Methylation
- The DNA methylome of human sperm is distinct from blood with little evidence for tissue-consistent obesity associations
- Correction: Molecular predictors of brain metastasis-related microRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma