Minor Type IV Collagen α5 Chain Promotes Cancer Progression through Discoidin Domain Receptor-1

Summary

Collagens, the major extracellular matrix components in most vertebrate tissues, provide cells with structural and functional support. Collagens are trimers of collagen α chains. Multiple trimers are formed by highly homologous α chains for certain types of collagens (e.g. α1α1α2, α3α4α5 and α5α5α6 heterotrimers for type IV collagen). Type IV collagens are named as major type (α1α1α2) or minor type (α3α4α5 and α5α5α6), mainly reflecting the abundance and tissue distribution, but not the importance of their biological functions. High similarity in sequence and domain structure of the α chains does not necessarily imply that major and minor type IV collagens share the same cell surface receptors and intracellular signaling pathways. In this study, we generated an α5(IV) chain deficient mouse model lacking minor type IV collagens. We found that the mutant mice have delayed development of KrasG12D-driven lung cancer without affecting major type IV collagen expression. α5(IV), but not α1(IV), ablation impaired non-integrin collagen receptor discoidin domain receptor-1 (DDR1)-ERK signaling, suggesting that major and minor type IV collagens are functionally distinct from each other.

Introduction

Basement membranes (BMs), specialized extracellular matrices separating epithelial and endothelial cells from underlying mesenchyme, provide cells with structural support, as well as morphogenic and functional cues [1–3]. Type IV collagens (Col IV) are major components of BMs [1,3]. Three triple helical protomers, α1α1α2, α3α4α5 and α5α5α6, are formed by the Col IV α chains that further form collagen networks [4,5]. α1α1α2, the major Col IV, is widely expressed as a component of all BMs. α3α4α5 and α5α5α6, known as minor Col IV, have much restricted tissue distribution [4,5].

Col IV-initiated signals are essential survival and growth cues for liver metastasis in diverse tumor types [6]. BM proteins produced by mouse Engelbrecht Holm-Swarm sarcoma, known as Matrigel, enhanced the tumorigenicity of human cancer cells [7]. BM proteins, including α1(IV), protect small cell lung cancer cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis [8]. Angiogenesis, required by tumors to supply nutrients and oxygen, and to evacuate metabolic wastes, is dependent on correct interaction between endothelial cells and the vascular BMs [1,9,10]. Col IV plays crucial roles in supporting endothelial cell proliferation and migration. Blood vessel formation and survival are connected with proper collagen synthesis and deposition in BMs. Col IV, by binding to cell surface receptors, activates intracellular signaling events to promote cell survival, proliferation and tumorigenesis [5]. Loss of integrin α1β1 ameliorates Kras^G12D-induced lung cancer [11,12]. β1 integrin and its downstream effecter focal adhesion kinase (FAK) are critical in mediating resistance to anoikis, chemotherapy-induced cell death and metastasis [6,8,11].

Despite Col IV is extensively studied, majority of the works focused on the functions of major Col IV, or unfortunately did not distinguish the roles of major and minor Col IV. It is largely unknown whether minor Col IV plays a role in cancer development. It also remains to be elucidated whether major and minor Col IV signal through the same cell surface receptors and intracellular signaling pathways and whether they can functionally compensate for each other.

In the present study, we demonstrate that minor Col IV α5 chain is indispensable in lung cancer development by using α5(IV)-deficient mouse model. α5(IV) supports lung cancer progression via cancer cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. α5(IV), but not α1(IV), promotes lung cancer cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis through non-integrin collagen receptor DDR1-mediated ERK activation. The functions of minor Col IV can not be compensated by abundant major Col IV.

Results

α5(IV) chain is required for lung cancer progression

A LacZ gene trap cassette including En2 splice acceptor/ECMV IRES/LacZ/SV40 polyadenylation site was inserted into intron 35 of mouse Col4a5 gene on chromosome X to generate Col4a5 knockout mice (S1A and S1B Fig) [13]. RT-PCR analyses demonstrated the absence of Col4a5 mRNA in the KO tissues (S1C and S1D Fig). The LacZ reporter reflects endogenous Col4a5 expression. Strong LacZ staining was observed in lung bronchia (S1E Fig). Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that α5(IV) chain is expressed in lung bronchia at high levels, and in lung alveolar epithelial cells at lower levels in Col4a5^+/Y (hereafter refereed as wild-type, WT) mice (S1F Fig). The α5(IV) signal is absent in Col4a5^LacZ/Y (hereafter refereed as knockout, KO) lungs (S1F Fig), further demonstrating that the mutant Col4a5 allele is indeed null.

Oncogenic Kras^G12D drives lung cancer onset and progression. In contrast to large, multifocal tumors formed in Kras^G12D; Col4a5^+/Y (Kras/α5 WT) mice, significantly less tumors developed in Kras^G12D; Col4a5^LacZ/Y (Kras/α5 KO) mice (Fig 1A and 1B). Tumors in Kras/α5 KO mice were significantly smaller than those in Kras/α5 WT mice (Fig 1A and 1C). α5(IV) ablation dramatically reduced the number of large tumors (>0.5 mm²), but had no profound effect on the number of small tumors (<0.1 mm²) (Fig 1D), indicating that α5(IV) is mainly involved in regulating tumor progression, but not tumor onset.

BM proteins promote cancer cell proliferation and protect cancer cells from apoptosis. Tumors in Kras/α5 KO mice had significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation (Fig 1E and 1F), compared with those in Kras/α5 WT mice. Few apoptotic signal was evident in both groups (Fig 1E). Hemorrhage was evident in α5 KO lungs, but not in WT lungs (Fig 1A). Hemorrhage lesions indicate improper organization of capillaries and blood vessels in α5 KO lungs. As tumor angiogenesis provides tumor cells nutrients and oxygen necessary for sustained tumor growth, this promoted us to examine whether neo-angiogenesis was compromised in Kras/α5 KO tumors. Indeed, tumors in Kras/α5 KO mice were significantly less vascularized (Fig 1E and 1G). Thus, reduction in tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis account for delayed tumor progression in Kras/α5 KO mice.

Epithelial α5(IV) supports tumor cell growth and tumorigenicity

α5(IV) is expressed in lung bronchia and alveolar epithelial cells (S1 Fig). To study the functions of epithelial α5(IV) in lung cancer development, endogenous α5(IV) was knocked down in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells (Fig 2A). α5(IV) knockdown significantly reduced A549 cell proliferation, migration and anchorage-independent cell growth (Fig 2B–2D), compared to cells expressing scramble control shRNA. This is not due to the off-target effect of α5(IV) shRNAs, as expression of mouse α5(IV) could rescue the phenotypes of α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells (S2 Fig). α5(IV) knockdown in CRL-5810 lung cancer cells similarly resulted in impaired cell proliferation and anchorage-independent cell growth (S3 Fig). Therefore, the endogenous α5(IV)-constituted BMs are essential in supporting lung cancer cell proliferation. To determine whether in vitro phenotypes were reflected in vivo, tumorigenic ability of A549 cells was tested by injecting control or α5(IV)-knockdown cells subcutaneously into nude mice. α5(IV) knockdown resulted in slower growing A549 xenograft tumors (Fig 2E). Less proliferating cells were detected in α5(IV)-knockdown xenograft tumors (Fig 2F and 2G).

α5(IV) is expressed in endothelial cells and regulates angiogenesis

Kras/α5 KO tumors were significantly less vascularized (Fig 1). However, knockdown of α5(IV) in A549 cells only mildly affected neo-angiogenesis in the xenograft tumors, which was not statistically significant (Fig 2F and 2H). This suggests that less angiogenesis observed in Kras/α5 KO tumors may be mainly due to ablation of stromal α5(IV). To examine the roles of stromal α5(IV) in tumor progression, murine Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells were implanted in Col4a5 WT or KO mice. Tumors grew significantly slower in KO than in WT mice (Fig 3A). Less proliferating cells were detected in the tumors from KO mice, than in that from WT mice (Fig 3B and 3D). Unlike the Kras-driven lung tumors, which were slowly growing and rare apoptosis was evident (Fig 1E), the LLC transplant tumors grew much faster. Apoptosis was evident in the LLC transplant tumors, due to rapid tumor growth (Fig 3C). More apoptotic cells were detected in the tumors from KO mice, than in that from WT mice (Fig 3C and 3D). These data collectively suggest stromal α5(IV) provides necessary survival and proliferation cues to support rapid LLC tumor growth. Tumors trigger profound angiogenesis to support vast nutrient and oxygen demand during rapid LLC transplant tumor growth in WT mice (Fig 3B). Fewer blood vessels formed in the LLC transplant tumors in the KO mice, compared to that in the WT mice (Fig 3B). The impaired tumor angiogenesis in the KO mice was not only reflected by decreased number of CD31-positive endothelial cells (Fig 3E), but also by dramatically decreased number of sinusoid microvessels (Fig 3F) and average vessel diameter (Fig 3G). To further test if stromal α5(IV) plays a role in regulating angiogenesis, VEGF containing Matrigel plugs were implanted subcutaneously in Col4a5 WT or KO mice. Abundant blood vessels, visualized by FITC-dextran, formed in the Matrigel plugs implanted in the WT mice, but not in the KO mice (Fig 3H). CD31 staining on Matrigel plug sections further revealed ~12-fold reduction of capillary numbers in the plugs in KO mice (Fig 3H and 3I). α5(IV) partially colocalized with endothelial cell marker CD31 in the lung (Fig 4A). Knockdown of α5(IV) in human microvascular endothelial cell-1 (HMEC-1) cells (Fig 4B) significantly reduced endothelial cell proliferation (Fig 4C) and migration (Fig 4D). Knockdown of α5(IV) in HMEC-1 cells also significantly impaired the tubule formation capability of endothelial cells (Fig 4E). Thus, endothelial α5(IV) may be responsible for efficient tumor angiogenesis.

α1(IV) can not functionally compensate for α5(IV)

Major Col IV is known to provide survival and growth cues to cancer cells. α5(IV) may regulate tumor progression through modulating major Col IV expression and basement membrane assembly. Electron microscopy on the lungs from 6-month old KO mice did not reveal overt defect in the basement membranes underneath lung alveolar epithelial cells (S4A Fig). Relatively more abundant α1(IV) expression was detected in KO lungs, compared to WT tissues (S4B Fig). Ablation of α5(IV) had no significant effect on α1(IV) expression in Kras-driven lung tumors (S4C Fig). Knockdown of α5(IV) in A549 (Fig 5A) and HMEC-1 (S7A Fig) cells did not significantly affect major Col IV α1(IV) or α2(IV) chain expression. Despite knockdown of α1(IV) impaired cellular functions of A549 (S5 Fig) and HMEC-1 (S6 Fig) cells, expression of α5(IV) was not affected (Fig 5A and S7A Fig). All these data collectively suggest that altered behavior of α5(IV)-deficient cells and impaired tumor progression in α5(IV)-deficient mice are not the results of concomitant loss of major Col IV expression or disruption of basement membrane structure. The presence of abundant α1(IV) also suggests that major Col IV can not functionally compensate for the loss of α5(IV) in supporting tumor growth.

Loss of α5(IV) impaired ERK activation

FAK is one of the major effecters transducing signals from Col IV [14]. FAK further phosphorylates and activates downstream signaling molecules, including Src [14]. Knockdown of α5(IV), however, did not affect phosphorylation levels of FAK and Src in A549 and CRL-5810 lung cancer cells (Fig 5A and S3A Fig). Instead, significantly lower phosphorylation levels of ERK and Akt, kinases essential in supporting cell survival, proliferation and transformation [15,16], were detected in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 and CRL-5810 cells (Fig 5A and S3A Fig). Ectopic expression of mouse α5(IV) in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells restored phosphorylation of ERK and Akt (S2E Fig). Interestingly, knockdown of α1(IV) resulted in impaired phosphorylation of Akt and Src, but not ERK or FAK in A549 cells (Fig 5A), reinforcing the notion that major and minor Col IV may regulate cancer cell behavior through overlapping, but not identical intracellular signaling pathways. Similar to that in lung cancer cells, knockdown of α5(IV), but not α1(IV), significantly decreased ERK phosphorylation in HMEC-1 cells (S7A Fig). To study if impaired ERK activation is responsible for the defects in cell proliferation and migration resulted from α5(IV) deficiency, constitutively active MEK1 was expressed in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 and HMEC-1 cells. Expression of constitutively active MEK1 successfully restored ERK phosphorylation in A549 and HMEC-1 cells (Fig 5B and S7B Fig). Expression of constitutively active MEK1 in A549 cells rescued the defects of cell proliferation (Fig 5C), migration (Fig 5D) and anchorage-independent cell growth (Fig 5E). Constitutively active MEK1 also restored the capability of cell proliferation (S7C Fig), migration (S7D Fig) and tubule formation (S7E Fig) of α5(IV)-knockdown HMEC-1 cells.

DDR1 transduces signal from α5(IV)

Col IV transduces signals through cell surface integrin and non-integrin receptors [5]. Knockdown of α5(IV) had no effect on cell surface integrin expression (S8 Fig). Knockdown of α5(IV) significantly decreased the expression of non-integrin collagen receptor DDR1 in lung cancer cells (Fig 6A and S3A Fig), which can be restored by ectopic mouse α5(IV) expression (S2E Fig). However, DDR1 expression was not altered in α1(IV)-knockdown lung cancer cells (Fig 6A). Similar to that in lung cancer cells, DDR1 expression was decreased in α5(IV)-, but not α1(IV)-, knockdown HMEC-1 cells (S9A Fig). In addition, significantly less DDR1 expression was detected in KO lungs, compared to WT tissues (Fig 6B). Ablation of α5(IV) also significantly decreased DDR1 expression in Kras-driven lung tumors (Fig 6C). Interestingly, α5(IV) knockdown in A549 cells did not affect DDR1 mRNA levels (Fig 6D), suggesting α5(IV) ablation may regulate DDR1 expression via mechanisms other than transcriptional regulation. A much faster decline of DDR1 protein was observed in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells subjected to cycloheximide treatment (Fig 6E and 6F), suggesting that α5(IV) regulates DDR1 expression at least partially by stabilizing DDR1 proteins. Lysosome inhibitor NH₄Cl had minimal effect on DDR1 protein levels (Fig 6G). Proteasome inhibitor MG132 treatment restored DDR1 protein levels in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells (Fig 6G). α5(IV) knockdown significantly increased DDR1 ubiquitination in A549 cells (Fig 6H). Therefore, α5(IV) ablation downregulates DDR1 expression by accelerating DDR1 ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation.

Knockdown of DDR1 in A549 cells resulted in decreased phosphorylation of ERK and Akt (Fig 7A), unaffected phosphorylation of FAK and Src (Fig 7A), as well as impaired cell proliferation (Fig 7B), migration (Fig 7C) and anchorage-independent cell growth (Fig 7D), resembling the phenotypes observed in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells. Knockdown of DDR1 in HMEC-1 cells similarly resulted in decreased phosphorylation of ERK and Akt (S9B Fig), impaired endothelial cell proliferation (S9C Fig), migration (S9D Fig) and tubule formation (S9E Fig). The similar phenotypes observed in the α5(IV)- and DDR1-knockdown cells indicate that DDR1 may be the receptor transducing signals from α5(IV). DDR1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that its phosphorylation is indicative of receptor activation and important in transducing downstream signals. Significantly less phosphorylation of DDR1 was detected in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells, compared to that in cells expressing scramble shRNA (Fig 8A). DDR1 expression was reduced in α5(IV)-knockdown cells and less amount of DDR1 was immunoprecipitated (Fig 8A). To more accurately examine DDR1 phosphorylation levels in α5(IV)-knockdown cells, DDR1 was expressed back to endogenous levels. Less DDR1 phosphorylation was detected in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells expressing exogenous DDR1 than the control cells, despite similar amount of DDR1 was immunoprecipitated (Fig 8A). Overexpression of DDR1 was not able to restore phosphorylation levels of ERK and Akt in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells (S10 Fig). These data collectively suggest that α5(IV) not only affects DDR1 stability and expression, but also is required for DDR1 activation.

To further study if DDR1 is functionally downstream of α5(IV), a chimeric Div-DDR1 is expressed in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells. The chimeric Div-DDR1 is constructed by replacing the extracellular ligand binding discoidin domain of DDR1 with Div, a coil-coiled domain from Bacillus subtilis DivIVA that forms constitutive dimer/oligomer [17,18]. Replacement of DDR1 ligand binding domain with Div provokes spontaneous DDR1 autophosphorylation and activation (Fig 8B) [18,19]. Expression of such a constitutively active Div-DDR1 in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells restored ERK and Akt phosphorylation (Fig 8C), cell proliferation (Fig 8D), migration (Fig 8E) and anchorage-independent cell growth (Fig 8F). Oligomerization capability and kinase activity of DDR1 are necessary for DDR1 function. Div-DDR1 with mutations in the Div coil-coiled domain (mDiv-DDR1) that disrupts Div self-assembly ability [17] or in the DDR1 kinase domain (Div-DDR1 K655A) that impairs DDR1 tyrosine kinase activity [20] failed to activate DDR1 (Fig 8B). Expression of such DDR1 mutants also failed to restore ERK and Akt phosphorylation (Fig 8C), cell proliferation (Fig 8D), migration (Fig 8E) and anchorage-independent cell growth (Fig 8F) in α5(IV)-knockdown A549 cells. To study if the DDR1 signaling pathway is involved in transducing signal from α5(IV) in endothelial cells, constitutively active DDR1 was expressed in α5(IV)-ablated HMEC-1 cells. Expression of constitutively active Div-DDR1, but not mDiv-DDR1 or Div-DDR1 K655A, in α5(IV)-knockdown HMEC-1 cells restored ERK and Akt phosphorylation (S11A Fig), and rescued the defects of cell proliferation (S11B Fig), migration (S11C Fig) and tubule formation (S11D Fig).

Discussion

Col IV, the major BM component, is essential in maintenance of tissue integrity and proper function. In addition to broadly expressed and extensively studied major Col IV α1α1α2, minor Col IV α3α4α5 and α5α5α6 are less abundantly expressed with restricted tissue distribution [4]. Physiological and pathological functions of minor Col IV, however, are less well understood. In this report, we present evidences that minor Col IV α5(IV) is essential in supporting lung cancer development via cancer cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. Minor but not major Col IV signals through non-integrin receptor DDR1.

Delayed tumor progression in α5(IV)-deficient mice suggests proper signal from α5(IV) is important in supporting cancer cell survival and proliferation. Col IV transduces signals through cell surface receptors. Cell surface integrin expression is unaffected in α5(IV)-knockdown cells. However, expression of DDR1, the non-integrin collagen receptor functioning independent of integrins [20–22], is decreased in α5(IV)-knockdown cells. DDR1 is highly phosphorylated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [23], and DDR1 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC [24]. Inhibition of DDR1 reduces cell survival, homing and colonization in lung cancer metastasis [25]. Consistently, DDR1 expression is elevated in lung tumors with Kras activation, compared to normal lung tissues (compare Fig 6B and 6C). Ablation of α5(IV) results in decreased DDR1 expression in both normal lung tissues and Kras lung tumors. DDR1-knockdown cells phenocopied α5(IV)-knockdown cells. More importantly, expression of constitutively active DDR1 in α5(IV)-knockdown cells can rescue the proliferation and migration defects, suggesting DDR1 is functionally downstream of α5(IV). α5(IV) knockdown impaired DDR1 phosphorylation. Overexpression of exogenous wild-type DDR1 can not restore ERK phosphorylation in α5(IV)-knockdown cells. These data indicate that the function of DDR1 requires the presence of α5(IV) and DDR1 may directly mediate the functions of α5(IV).

Despite α5(IV) knockdown does not affect integrin cell surface expression, the possibility exists that integrins are functional receptors for α5(IV). Col IV was reported to bind integrins through sites within the triple-helical cyanogen bromide-derived fragments and noncollagenous domains [5]. Such studies were largely based on purified Col IV or Col IV fragments. It should be noted that proper collagen network assembly and geometry are critical in the biological functions of Col IV. Ablation of endogenous Col IV using gene knockout or silencing will provide more physiologically relevant insights into receptor binding, signaling and biological functions of Col IV. It remains to be elucidated whether integrins have selectivity and specificity towards major and minor Col IV under different physiological and pathological circumstances. DDR1 and integrins may have cooperative or opposing functions in response to collagens [26,27]. The crosstalk between DDR1 and integrins upon α5(IV) binding may provide the cells more robustness.

Ablation of α5(IV) does not affect major Col IV expression, or disrupt basement membrane assembly. The inability of abundant major α1α1α2(IV) to support efficient tumor growth and progression in α5(IV)-deficient mice indicates that major Col IV can not functionally compensate for the deficiency of minor Col IV. This is supported by the fact that mutations of Col IV α chains cause distinct heritable diseases. Mutations in COL4A1 cause encephaloclastic porencephaly, characterized by degenerative cavities and cerebral lesions in the brain [28]. Deletion of Col4a1/Col4a2 locus in mice results in growth retardation and embryonic lethality [29]. However, mutations in COL4A5 (Alport’s syndrome) or auto-antibody recognizing α3(IV) (Goodpasture’s syndrome) result in progressive renal failure [4,5]. Mice deficient of α3(IV) [30,31] or α5(IV) [32] are viable, but develop renal phenotypes reminiscent of that in Alport’s syndrome. Knockdown of major Col IV α1(IV) does not affect DDR1 expression. The overlapping, but not identical spectrum of altered signaling events in α5(IV)- and α1(IV)-knockdown cells suggests that major and minor Col IV may exert their biological functions via different cell surface receptors and intracellular signaling pathways.

Major and minor Col IV share same domain structure and high sequence similarity. It is yet unclear how highly similar major and minor Col IV recognize different cell surface receptor and activate different intracellular signaling pathways. α3α4α5(IV) is highly cross-linked due to its larger degree intra- and inter-chain disulfide bonds, relative to α1α1α2(IV) [33]. As a result, α3α4α5(IV) has different biochemical properties from α1α1α2(IV) that α3α4α5(IV) is more resistant to proteolytic degradation [33]. Different biomechanical force from major and minor Col IV may be responsible for the receptor specificity. It should be noted that Col IV protomers further form α1α1α2(IV)-α1α1α2(IV), α3α4α5(IV)-α3α4α5(IV) and α1α1α2(IV)-α5α5α6(IV) networks [4,5]. These networks may differentially recognize cell surface receptors and activate intracellular signaling pathways, thus provide signal specificity and redundancy.

α5(IV) regulates cancer progression via cancer cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. The DDR1-ERK signaling cascade is required for the functions of both cancer cells and endothelial cells. Stromal components, including blood vessels, constitute proper microenvironment to support tumor progression. It is reported that stable microvasculature sustains cancer cells at dormancy, whereas sprouting neovasculature rescues cancer cells from cell cycle arrest and promotes cancer cell proliferation [34]. Col IV assembly is critical for vascular BM integrity and structural organization. Small-molecule inhibitors that interfere Col IV biosynthesis were shown to prevent angiogenesis and tumor growth [35]. α5(IV) is expressed in the endothelium. Deficiency of α5(IV) delayed in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis. It warrants further study if the cancer cells in α5(IV) KO mice remain dormant due to impaired neo-angiogenesis.

In summary, we provides evidences in this study that α5(IV) deficiency significantly delays tumor progression. α5(IV) signals through non-integrin collagen receptor DDR1 in lung cancer cells and endothelial cells. α5(IV) promotes tumor growth via both cancer cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms. Abundant major Col IV is not able to compensate for α5(IV) deficiency.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free environment at the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and treated in strict accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (Approval number: SIBCB-NAF-15-003-S325-006).

Reagents

The antibodies used are ERK, ERK pT202/pY204, Akt, Akt pS473, Src, Src pY416, cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling), FAK (BD Transduction Laboratories), FAK pY397 (Millipore), Ki-67 (Novocastra Laboratories), α1(IV) (Abgent), α2(IV) and CD31 (Abcam), α5(IV) (rabbit ployclonal antibody from Proteintech (western blot) and rat monoclonal antibody clone b14 (immunostaining) provided by Dr. Yoshikazu Sado, Shigei Medical Research Institute [36]), DDR1, phosho-tyrosine (pY99), ubiquitin (Santa Cruz), MEK1 (Abmart), Actin (Sigma-Aldrich), biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Zymed), Alexa Fluor 555/488 conjugated anti-mouse, rat or rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). Expression level of integrins on A549 cell surface was determined by immunofluorescence flow cytometry with anti-β1 (Thermo Scientific Pierce), α1, α2 and α11 (Santa Cruz) integrin antibodies as described [37]. Cycloheximide, MG132 and NH₄Cl were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Plasmids and generation of stable cell lines

The shRNAs were cloned into pLKO.1-puro lenti-viral vector (Addgene). Viral packaging and infection of cells was performed as previously described [38]. After viral infection, cells were selected with puromycin to generate stable cell lines. At least two batches of stable cell lines were generated for each experiment. Experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least twice using each batch of cells. The target sequences are: 5’-CAACAAGATGAAGAGCACCAAC-3’ (shScram), 5’-GGGTGATGATGGAATTCCA-3’ (shCOL4A5-1), 5’-GCAGATCAGTGAACAGAAAAG-3’ (shCOL4A5-2), 5’-TCCAGGATGCAATGGCACAAA -3’ (shCOL4A1-1), 5’-TCCAGGTTCCAAGGGAGAAAT -3’ (shCOL4A1-2), 5’-GGTTACTCTTCAGCGAAAT -3’ (shDDR1-1), and 5’-AGATGGAGTTTGAGTTTGACC -3’ (shDDR1-2).

To generate cell lines expressing mouse α5(IV), DDR1 or Div-DDR1, coding sequences were cloned into pCDH-Neo lenti-viral vector (Addgene). α5(IV)-knockdown cells were infected with lenti-virus harboring mouse α5(IV), DDR1 or Div-DDR1 sequences and selected with G418. Mouse Col4a5 sequences were amplified from B16-F10 cDNA using primers 5’-gatcTCTAGAatgcaagtgcgtggagtgtgcc-3’ (forward) and 5’-gatcGCGGCCGCttatgtcctcttcatgcatact-3’ (reverse). Amplicon was inserted into pCDH-Neo vector. HA-tagged human DDR1 was cloned from MCF-7 cDNA using primers 5’-GATCGAATTCATGGGACCAGAGGCCCTGT-3’ (forward) and 5’-GATCGCGGCCGCTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACACCGTGTTGAGTGCATCCT-3’ (reverse). Amplicon was inserted into pCDH-Neo. K655A substitution was introduced by two step PCR amplification that was restricted with XhoI and NotI and exchanged for the corresponding wild-type fragment in the DDR1 expression construct. The primers used were 5’-CCCGTCCCCCTCGAGGCCC-3’ (fragment 1, forward), 5’-CCGTAAGATCGCGACAGCTACCAGCAAAGG-3’ (fragment 1, reverse), 5’-GTAGCTGTCGCGATCTTACGGCCAGATGCC-3’ (fragment 2, forward), and 5’-GATCGCGGCCGCTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACACCGTGTTGAGTGCATCCT-3’ (fragment 2, reverse). To generate the Div-DDR1 chimeric proteins, the coding sequences of DDR1 discoidin domain (aa 29–367) was replaced by a 51bp oligonecleotide sequences compromising BstBI and BamHI restriction sites by two step PCR. The primers used were 5’-GATCgaattcATGGGACCAGAGGCCCTGT-3’ (fragment 1, forward), 5’-GGATCCGTGATAGTTTTTGCTAAGCAACTCTTCAACTTTATCTTCCAACTGTTTCATTTCGAACTTGGCAGGATCAAAATGTC-3’ (fragment 1, reverse), 5’- TTCGAAATGAAACAGTTGGAAGATAAAGTTGAAGAGTTGCTTAGCAAAAACTATCACGGATCCGTGGTGAACAATTCCTCTCCG-3’ (fragment 2, forward), and 5’-GATCgcggccgcTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACACCGTGTTGAGTGCATCCT-3’ (fragment 2, reverse). The Div coil-coiled domain [18] (wild-type: MKQLEDKVEELLSKNYHLENEVARLKKLVGERGSSGSGR; mutant: MKQLEDKVEELLSKNYHVENEVARVKKLVGERGSSGSGR), amplified using primers 5’-GATCTTCGAAATGAAACAGTTGGAAGATAAAG-3’ (forward) and 5’-GATCGGATCCGCGGCCGCTTCCAGAGCTTCC-3’ (reverse), was placed between BstBI and BamHI sites. Human CA-MEK1 was prepared by substituting Ser 218 and Ser 222 in MEK1 with glutamic acids and removing residues 31 to 52 as described [39].

RT-PCR

Total RNA was prepared and retrotranscribed as described [40]. The RT-PCR primers used are: human/mouse COL4A5: 5’-TGCCTTCGTCGCTTTAGT-3’ (forward) and 5’-TTGACCTGAGCCTTCTGC-3’ (reverse); Mouse Col4a5: 5’-GGATTGGCTATTCCTTCAT-3’ (forward) and 5’-GCATACTTGACATCGGCTA-3’ (reverse); Human/mouse ACTIN: 5’-cctagaagcatttgcggtgg-3’ (forward) and 5’-gagctacgagctgcctgacg-3’ (reverse).

Cell proliferation, migration and anchorage-independent cell growth assays

A549 and CRL-5810 cells (ATCC) were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Hyclone) supplemented with 5% FBS (Biochrom). 293T cells and Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM (GIBCO) with 10% FBS. Human microvascular endothelial cell-1 (HMEC-1) (generously provided by Dr. Zhengjun Chen) was cultured in MCDB131 (GIBCO) with 10% FBS, 10ng/mL EGF and 1μg/mL hydrocortisone. To study the functions of endogenous Col IV, the lung cancer cells and endothelial cells were plated directly on tissue culture plates without exogenous substance coating. MTT, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, migration and anchorage-independent cell growth assays were performed as described [40,41].

In vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assay

In vitro angiogenesis assay was performed as described [42] by seeding HMEC-1 cells in the rat tail type I collagen sandwich gel in the presence of VEGF. Cells were photographed after 24 hours. In vivo Matrigel plug assay was performed as described [43] by subcutaneously injecting growth factor reduced Matrigel containing 50 ng recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor into 8-week-old WT or Col4a5 ^LacZ/Y mice in C57/Bl background. On day 14, Dextran-FITC was injected through the tail vein 30 min before the mice were sacrificed. Matrigel plugs were fixed and sectioned for CD31 staining. Histological vascular parameters, including microvascular density (MVD), sinusoid microvessel number, and vascular diameter, were measured [44].

Immunoprecipitation and immuno blot

Total cell lysates were harvested in hot SDS sample buffer. For immunoprecipitation, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. DDR1 was immunoprecipitated with anti-DDR1 (Santa Cruz) antibody. Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, washed with TBS-T (TBS with 0.1% Tween-20), and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour. Immuno-reactive protein was detected using SuperSignal West Pico Chem KIT (Thermo Scientific, USA). Primary antibodies used were against ERK, ERK pT202/pY204, Akt, Akt pS473, Src, Src pY416 (Cell Signaling), FAK (BD Transduction Laboratories), FAK pY397 (Millipore), α1(IV) (Abgent), α2(IV) (Abcam), DDR1, phosho-tyrosine (pY99), ubiquitin (Santa Cruz), α5(IV) (Proteintech), MEK1 (Abmart) and Actin (Sigma-Aldrich). Western blots were scanned and analyzed with Image J.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining

Immunohistochemistry on 5-μm paraffin sections using antibodies against Ki-67 (Novocastra Laboratories), cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling), CD31 (Abcam), α1(IV) (Abgent) or DDR1 (Santa Cruz) was performed as described [40]. For α5(IV) immuno-staining, 8-μm frozen tissue sections were fixed in cold acetone for 10 min. Samples were incubated with α5(IV) antibody (rat monoclonal antibody clone b14) (1:50–1:100) for 16 hours at 4°C, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 555/488 conjugated anti-rat IgG antibody. Immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence sections were viewed under microscope (IX71; OLYMPUS, Inc.) with a UPlan-FLN 4×objective/0.13 PhL, a UPlan-FLN 10×objective/0.30 PhL, or a LUCPlan-FLN 20×objective/0.45 PhL. Images were captured with a digital camera (IX-SPT; OLYMPUS, Inc.) and Digital Acquire software (DPController; OLYMPUS, Inc.). Perfused blood vessels in Matrigel plugs were viewed by UV-illumination under microscope (SZX16; OLYMPUS, Inc.) with a SDF-PLAPO 1×PF. Images were captured with a digital camera (U-LH100HGAPO; OLYMPUS, Inc.) and Digital Acquire software (DPController; OLYMPUS, Inc.).

Mouse treatment

All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free environment at the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and treated in strict accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Col4a5^LacZ/Y mice were generated and maintained in C57/Bl background by the European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis Program [13]. Kras^G12D mice were back crossed to C57/Bl background 3 generations before cross with Col4a5^LacZ/Y mice. LLC cells were transplanted at the armpit of lower limb of 8-week old WT or Col4a5 ^LacZ/Y mice in C57/Bl background. To minimize the possible effects of mouse genetic background on tumor behavior, wild-type littermates were used as control for Col4a5^LacZ/Y mice in all experiments. A549 cells were subcutaneously injected into Balb/c nude mice.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Lung tissues isolated from 6-month old Col4a5^+/Y and Col4a5^LacZ/Y mice were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M PBS (pH7.4) for 4 hours at room temperature and then in 1% osmium tetroxide overnight at 4°C. The fixed lung tissue were dehydrated through an alcohol series and embedded in Epon812 Resin at 60°C for 48 hours. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were collected on copper grids. The grids were stained in 2% uranyl acetate for 40 minutes and in 0.5% lead citrate for 8 minutes orderly. The samples were examined under FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit TEM.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the two-sided Student t test, and considered statistically significant when the P value was less than 0.05.

Supporting Information

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

Attachment 4

Attachment 5

Attachment 6

Attachment 7

Attachment 8

Attachment 9

Attachment 10

Attachment 11