Rapid Sequestration of by Neutrophils Contributes to the Development of Chronic Lesion
Infection with the protozoan Leishmania parasites causes a spectrum of diseases ranging from cutaneous to visceral forms that are fatal if left untreated. Among the different Leishmania species, Leishmania mexicana causes chronic cutaneous lesions in humans. To study this disease, we used a murine model. Following infection with Leishmania mexicana, most mouse species including C57BL/6 develop chronic non-healing lesion. Within hours of infection, neutrophils are recruited locally and they ingest the parasites. Although neutrophils are leukocytes that are able to rapidly kill pathogens using an arsenal of molecules, several microorganisms including some, but not all, Leishmania species are able to survive within these cells. Here, we show that L. mexicana elicits the rapid recruitment of neutrophils at the site of infection, survives within these cells and uses them to its advantage. Furthermore, transient parasite sequestration by neutrophils delays recruitment of other leukocytes such as monocytes, contributing to the impaired development of a protective immune response against the parasite and chronic lesion development. Thus, we describe a previously unanticipated pathogenic role for neutrophils in chronic lesion development. More importantly, our data suggest that in certain forms of cutaneous leishmaniasis, regulating neutrophil recruitment could be a strategy to promote lesion healing.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Pathog 11(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004929
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004929
Summary
Infection with the protozoan Leishmania parasites causes a spectrum of diseases ranging from cutaneous to visceral forms that are fatal if left untreated. Among the different Leishmania species, Leishmania mexicana causes chronic cutaneous lesions in humans. To study this disease, we used a murine model. Following infection with Leishmania mexicana, most mouse species including C57BL/6 develop chronic non-healing lesion. Within hours of infection, neutrophils are recruited locally and they ingest the parasites. Although neutrophils are leukocytes that are able to rapidly kill pathogens using an arsenal of molecules, several microorganisms including some, but not all, Leishmania species are able to survive within these cells. Here, we show that L. mexicana elicits the rapid recruitment of neutrophils at the site of infection, survives within these cells and uses them to its advantage. Furthermore, transient parasite sequestration by neutrophils delays recruitment of other leukocytes such as monocytes, contributing to the impaired development of a protective immune response against the parasite and chronic lesion development. Thus, we describe a previously unanticipated pathogenic role for neutrophils in chronic lesion development. More importantly, our data suggest that in certain forms of cutaneous leishmaniasis, regulating neutrophil recruitment could be a strategy to promote lesion healing.
Introduction
Leishmania species (spp) are intracellular protozoan parasites that cause leishmaniases, a spectrum of diseases ranging from cutaneous lesions to deadly visceral forms. Following infection, the promastigote form of the parasite is inoculated in mammalian hosts by sand flies. The parasites then transform into the amastigote form and multiply within macrophages, the parasite’s final host cells. Protection against the disease has been linked to secretion of IL-12 by innate cells, promoting the differentiation of IFNγ-producing CD4+ Th1 cells. IFNγ induces parasite killing by macrophages correlating with resolution of infection, reviewed in [1,2]. Leishmania (L.) mexicana is a member of the New-World Leishmania species that cause chronic cutaneous infection in humans and mice. The events involved in the initiation of an immune response to L. mexicana infection are still poorly understood and are studied in experimental models, reviewed in [3]. Following L. mexicana infection, most mouse strains develop a progressive non-healing chronic lesion with parasite persistence. Susceptibility of C57BL/6 mice to L. mexicana infection correlates in vivo with poor recruitment of monocytes and DCs, as well as low expansion of parasite responding Th1 cells [4,5]. Failure to control lesion size and parasite load in these mice has been linked to low IL-12 release by innate immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) correlating with poor development of Th1 cells [6–10].
Neutrophils are part of the first line of defense against pathogens. They rapidly phagocytose microorganisms and kill them by different mechanisms including the production of radical oxygen species and antibacterial peptides. In addition, neutrophils can form extracellular traps (NETs) that are DNA structures coated with antimicrobial molecules [11]. NETs sequester microorganisms, immobilize them and in some cases kill them, reviewed in [12,13].
Neutrophils are rapidly and massively recruited to the site of infection in experimental models of cutaneous (L. major, L. amazonensis) or visceral (L. infantum) leishmaniasis [14–19]. Interestingly, L. major parasites can escape killing within neutrophils prior to their uptake by macrophages either by phagocytosis of apoptotic parasitized neutrophils and/or of live parasites released by neutrophils [16,20]. In addition, some Leishmania spp induce NET formation in vitro that traps them, and may or may not reduce parasite survival [21,22]. Different Leishmania-spp-specific features may explain the inconsistent effects of neutrophils on Leishmania spp survival.
Here, we investigated the role of neutrophils following L. mexicana infection, both at the onset of infection using transient neutrophil depletion and during acute and chronic phases of the disease using the neutropenic Genista mice. Our results show that early sequestration of parasites by neutrophils has a major negative impact on disease progression.
Results
Neutropenia leads to control of lesion development following L. mexicana infection
In order to evaluate the role of neutrophils on disease development after L. mexicana infection, we analyzed the kinetics of neutrophil recruitment during the first hours following inoculation of infectious metacyclic parasites in the ear pinna of C57BL/6 mice. Neutrophils are rapidly and massively recruited to the site of Leishmania infection following the bite of infected sand flies [16]. To determine the dose of parasites that would induce neutrophil recruitment following needle injection of infective stage L. mexicana metacyclic promastigotes in the ear dermis of mice, a dose curve was performed. Of the different parasite doses, injection of 106 metacyclic L. mexicana elicited 24 hours p.i. the recruitment of neutrophils in the ear dermis of mice (S1 Fig) in numbers that were within the range of those observed in the ear dermis of mice 24 hours after sand fly transmission of L. major [16]. This parasite dose was thereon used in this study. Analysis of infiltrating immune cells using flow cytometry showed transient parasite-induced neutrophil recruitment peaking between 12 and 24 hours after infection (Fig 1A and 1B). To analyze neutrophil infiltration in vivo, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in the infected ear pinna was imaged by luminol-based bioluminescence [23]. Peak MPO activity was observed at similar kinetics post infection, suggesting rapid activation of extravasated dermal neutrophils (Fig 1A and 1B and S2).
To investigate the impact of early neutrophil recruitment on the control of infection we used C57BL/6 mice depleted of neutrophils during the first three days of infection using the neutrophil-depleting 1A8 mAb, and Genista mice that lack mature neutrophils [24]. The absence of mature neutrophils in these mice was verified by flow cytometry during the first 3 days of infection (Fig 1C and 1D) and (S3 Fig). Only a low frequency of immature neutrophils (Ly6G intermediate) was recruited to the site of infection in neutropenic mice (Fig 1E), in line with their atypical phenotype [24].
The impact of early and/or sustained neutropenia on the course of the disease was compared to that of C57BL/6 mice. In the first 3 weeks following intradermal (i.d.) inoculation of 106 infectious L. mexicana promastigotes all groups of mice developed similar lesion sizes. The lesion size of C57BL/6 mice subsequently reached a plateau with persistent inflammatory lesion. In sharp contrast, the lesion size of mice with transient or sustained neutropenia decreased in size and was resolved eight weeks post infection (Fig 1F). These results reveal that the presence of neutrophils during the first days following L. mexicana infection prevents the resolution of the parasite-induced lesion.
Rapid parasite-induced NET formation traps but does not kill L. mexicana parasites
To investigate whether L. mexicana can induce NET formation, neutrophils were exposed in vitro to L. mexicana-DsRed and the generation of NETs was visualized by confocal microscopy for DNA and NET associated MPO. L. mexicana clearly elicited NET formation, a process that was abrogated if DNase was added (Fig 2A). NET formation was not induced in unstimulated neutrophils (Fig 2A). Of note, L. mexicana-DsRed parasites were observed either in association with NETs or detected within intact neutrophils (Fig 2A and 2B). To determine if L. mexicana parasites were killed by NETs we generated L. mexicana expressing a firefly luciferase reporter gene. Four hours after incubation with netting neutrophils the majority of L. mexicana parasites were viable luciferase-expressing L. mexicana and their frequency did not vary in co-cultures performed in presence of DNase (Fig 2C). These data demonstrate that L. mexicana are able to survive within NETs in vitro.
We then determined if L. mexicana triggered NET formation in vivo. Twenty-four hours after infection i.e. at the peak of neutrophil infiltration, immunohistology was performed on infected ears (Fig 2D). L. mexicana i.d. inoculation induced NET formation locally as judged by the presence of extracellular DNA fibers associated with MPO. In addition, parasites identified by their smaller nuclear DNA were also observed in association with NETs (Fig 2E). In neutropenic mice, the cellular infiltrate was significantly smaller as compared to C57BL/6 mice. Even though L. mexicana induced NET formation was observed in neutropenic mice at tissue depths where neutrophils were detectable, NET frequency was significantly lower as compared to C57BL/6 mice (Fig 2F). Collectively these results show that L. mexicana induces NET formation that traps parasites, but remarkably most of the trapped parasites survived.
Absence of neutrophils improves early parasite control
We then determined the impact of neutrophils on early parasite control at the site of infection. To this end, DsRed-expressing L. mexicana parasites were inoculated i.d. in the ear pinna. The number of live parasites in the ear pinna were significantly reduced in neutropenic mice compared to control mice as analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig 3A) and limiting dilution analysis (Fig 3B). We next determined where the parasite was located. Twenty-four hours p.i. around 80% of the infected cells found at the site of infection were CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils as quantified by flow cytometry (Fig 3C). Significantly lower numbers of infected cells were detected in neutropenic mice and parasites were mostly found in CD11b+Ly6Chigh monocytes, followed in decreasing order by CD11b+CD11c+ dendritic cells and CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages (Fig 3D). The frequency of parasitized neutrophils peaked between 12 and 24 hours post infection (Fig 3E), and L. mexicana intracellular presence within neutrophils was confirmed in vivo by 2-photon intravital microscopy using LyzM-GFP mice (Fig 3F).
Ingestion of some microorganisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis delays neutrophil apoptosis [25], with a potential impact on the microenvironment present at the site of infection. We thus analyzed the apoptotic status of dermal neutrophils 24 hours p.i., and ImageStream imaging analysis revealed similar frequencies of AnnexinV+DAPI- apoptotic, AnnexinV+DAPI+ apoptotic/necrotic neutrophils irrespective of the presence of L. mexicana-DsRed. This correlated with the high frequency (>80%) of live AnnexinV-DAPI- neutrophils observed in both uninfected and infected neutrophils (Fig 4A and 4B). Altogether, these data show that presence of L. mexicana within neutrophils does not induce neutrophil apoptosis and does also not lead to parasite killing. The presence of neutrophils thus improves parasite survival.
Neutropenia impacts cellular recruitment and changes cell dynamics at the site of L. mexicana inoculation and in draining lymph nodes
To investigate the impact of early neutropenia on DC mobilization following parasite infection, LyzM-GFP/CD11c-YFP double transgenic mice depleted or not of neutrophils were inoculated with L. mexicana in the ear pinna and the site of infection was visualized 24 hours later by 2-photon microscopy. Although L. mexicana was phagocytosed by DCs in both control and neutropenic mice (Fig 5A), the DC distribution observed in the ear dermis of mice transiently depleted of neutrophils differed markedly from that of similarly infected control mice treated with the RR3-16 mAb. First, a higher frequency of DCs was observed at the site of infection in neutropenic compared to control mice (Fig 5B and S1 and S2 Movies). Second, the distribution of DCs at the site of infection was markedly changed as the YFP signal from DCs was mostly found in close proximity around the parasites in the infected zone of neutropenic mice (Fig 5C).
To better discriminate DC behavior at the site of infection, CD11c-YFP reporter mice were similarly infected and DC dynamics was analyzed by 2-photon imaging 24 hours later. The velocity of DCs located close (<10μm) but not that of DCs located further away from the parasites (>10μm) was markedly decreased in neutropenic mice. In contrast, DC mobility close and further from parasites did not differ in the ear dermis of control mice (Fig 5D and 5E, S3 and S4 Movies).
To determine if the increased frequency of dermal DCs observed by 2-photon intravital microscopy was sustained during the first days of infection, the ear dermis and draining lymph node (dLN) of mice inoculated with L. mexicana was analyzed 3 days p.i. Only poor recruitment of inflammatory monocytes and monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs) was observed in C57BL/6 ear dermis in line with a previous report [5]. In contrast, a markedly increased frequency and number of inflammatory monocytes and MoDCs were recruited in the ear dermis of both PMN-depleted and Genista mice (Fig 6A). The frequency and number of MoDCs in the dLN were also increased (Fig 6B).
To investigate how neutrophils could affect monocyte and MoDC recruitment to the site of infection, mRNA levels of CCL2, CCL3 and CCL5, three chemokines involved in monocyte recruitment, were analyzed in the ears of L. mexicana-infected mice. 24 and 72 hours post infection, ears of Genista, RR3-16- or 1A8-treated C57BL/6 mice were isolated and chemokine mRNA levels analyzed. 24 hours post infection, all three chemokine mRNA levels were low with no observed increased mRNA levels in neutropenic mice (S4 Fig). 72 hours post infection chemokine mRNA levels remained low in infected C57BL/6 mice treated with the RR3-16 control mAb with values comparable to those of uninfected mice injected with PBS. In contrast, a significant increase in mRNA levels of the three chemokines was observed in neutropenic mice (Fig 6C–6E). Of note, among the three chemokines analyzed mRNA levels of ccl2, a key monocyte attractant, were the most induced. Collectively, these data suggest that the presence of L. mexicana within neutrophils impairs the transcription of monocyte-recruiting chemokines by cells present at the site of infection.
To further demonstrate that the presence of neutrophils impaired the recruitment of dermal monocytes and MoDCs in C57BL/6 mice, 106 sorted C57BL/6 neutrophils were adoptively transferred in the ear dermis of Genista mice at the time of L. mexicana inoculation. The presence of mature neutrophils in the Genista ear dermis markedly decreased the L. mexicana-induced recruitment of inflammatory monocytes and of MoDCs (Fig 7A and 7B). Collectively, these data show a striking negative effect of neutrophils on the recruitment and the behavior of DCs following infection with L. mexicana.
Genista and C57BL/6 mice depleted of neutrophils lack mature NK cells [24,26]. To address whether the increased monocyte and MoDC recruitment observed in neutropenic mice was based on a NK cell defect, C57BL/6 and neutropenic mice were depleted of NK cells prior to infection with L. mexicana. Depletion had no impact on monocyte and MoDC recruitment in both control and neutropenic mice (S5 Fig) ruling out a role for NK cells in the early recruitment of monocytes and MoDCs to the site of infection.
Neutropenia favors the development of a protective immune response against L. mexicana infection
To investigate the long-term impact of transient or sustained neutropenia on the development of L. mexicana-specific immune response, we analyzed IFNγ production in dLN cells of Genista and PMN-depleted mice as this cytokine induces macrophage-killing of Leishmania parasites. Three weeks post infection, neutropenic mice had a higher fraction of intracellular IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells in the dLN (Fig 8A). This corresponded to increased IFNγ secretion into the cell supernatant of parasite-restimulated dLN cells 3 and 8 weeks p.i. and TNFα secretion was also increased (Fig 8B). In contrast, Th2 cytokine levels such as IL-4 and IL-13 were not modified by neutropenia (Fig 8C). In line with the higher IFNγ levels observed in neutropenic mice, the frequency and number of infected cells were lower at 8 weeks post infection in these mice in the ear dermis (Fig 8D). Collectively, these data demonstrate that rapid sequestration of L. mexicana parasites by neutrophils severely limits the induction of an adaptive immune response, contributing to the development of chronic cutaneous disease.
Discussion
Neutrophils are emerging as important players in the development of adaptive immunity. However little is known regarding their role in the development of chronic diseases, and there are currently contradictory findings on their role in the control of Leishmania. Here, we report and quantify for the first time Leishmania-induced NET formation shortly after parasite inoculation in vivo. Most microorganisms, including protozoan parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii [27] and L. amazonensis [21] are killed by NETs. In contrast, L. mexicana-induced NETs did not kill entrapped parasites. Similarly, L. donovani, L. major and L. infantum were reported to escape NET killing in vitro, a process associated with the presence of Lipophosphoglycan or 3’nucleotidase/nuclease, two molecules expressed in Leishmania promastigotes [22,28]. Thus evasion of NET killing by Leishmania promastigotes appears to be an important survival strategy in several Leishmania spp.
During natural sand fly infection an average of 5000 to 10 000 infectious promastigotes can be inoculated in the mouse host dermis [29], leading to massive local neutrophil recruitment which persists during the first days of infection [16]. However, needle inoculation of a relatively high dose (106) of parasites was required to induce a comparable number of neutrophil recruitment in the ear pinna. The lack of neutrophil recruitment observed following needle inoculation of a low dose of parasites could be explained by the absence of vector-derived factors. Indeed, in addition to parasites, sand flies deliver salivary gland products [30, 31] together with a proteophosphoglycan rich gel of parasite origin named promastigote secretory gel (PSG) [32]. Both sand fly delivered factors contribute to the recruitment of inflammatory cells [31,33,34]. Furthermore, sand fly factors and PSG can exacerbate infection and interfere with the parasiticidal status of macrophages [33]. Interestingly, a sand fly salivary gland endonuclease from Lutzomia Longipalpis, the vector of Leishmania infantum, was recently shown to be able to digest NET scaffold in vitro [35]. It is not known which quantity of endonuclease or how long nuclease activity persists at the site of infection, but these data suggest that components present in salivary glands of some sand fly vectors could interfere with NET formation at least within the first hours of infection. It is therefore important to consider that salivary gland products and/or PSG contribute to neutrophil recruitment and may also influence early parasite survival shortly after infection, an area that would warrant further studies.
Susceptibility to Leishmania is complex and results from a combination of factors. Among these, Leishmania species express distinct virulence factors favoring their spreading within the host. Cysteine peptidase (CP) enzymes are important virulence factors present in parasites of the L. mexicana complex [36]. C57BL/6 mice infected with CPB-deficient L. mexicana can develop a Th1 immune response and heal their lesions [37]. Expression of L. mexicana CPB is stage specific, with the highest expression observed at the amastigote stage. Although L. mexicana promastigotes express less CPB than amastigotes, interactions between L. mexicana promastigote CPB and neutrophils could already have an impact on the onset of the immune response. CPB could contribute to the impaired secretion of chemokines and cytokines observed in response to L. mexicana and/or released CPB could modulate local cell recruitment through potential impact on chemokines, an effect previously reported by other protozoan CPBs [38,39]. Neutrophils with their numerous cytosolic proteases may contribute to CPB activity and favor chemokine inhibition, an area that remains to be investigated.
Distinct Leishmania species may have different impacts on neutrophils and the latters may play disease protective or susceptible roles, a process that can also be influenced by host genetic factors. L. major exposure elicited distinct innate receptors, cytokine and chemokine secretion in neutrophils from mice genetically resistant (C57BL/6) or susceptible (BALB/c) to infection [40,41]. Early neutrophil recruitment had a deleterious role on disease outcome in BALB/c mice and a transient protective role with no impact on disease outcome in C57BL/6 mice following L. major infection [15,42]. In contrast, a small transient protective role for neutrophils was observed following L. amazonensis infection in BALB/c but not C57BL/6 mice [43]. Here we show that sequestration of L. mexicana by neutrophils impairs the development of a protective response in C57BL/6 mice. We observed similar deleterious role for neutrophils in L. mexicana infected BALB/c mice (S6 Fig) suggesting that following L. mexicana infection, the negative impact of neutrophils on disease outcome results from parasite factors rather than from local host genetic factors.
In addition to genetic background, the dose and site of infection may also have an impact on disease outcome (reviewed in [3]). Thus during natural infection the influence of neutrophils on the various forms of the disease may depend on several factors including parasites and host genetic factors, the site of infection, and the number of parasites transmitted by the sand fly.
Several microorganisms use different strategies to inhibit neutrophil killing [20,44–47]. It was thus hypothesized that neutrophils could be used as a shuttle (Trojan horse) to enter into a host [48]. These data and those presented herein suggest that subversion of parasite uptake by neutrophils, which is observed at the very early phase of infection, may be used by several microorganisms to enhance initial pathogen survival and to prevent immune control.
In addition to their well-established role as the first line of defense against pathogens, neutrophils have recently emerged as important players in regulating the launching of the adaptive immune response, reviewed in [49,50]. Modulation of neutrophil apoptosis can delay the onset of the immune response, as observed following phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by neutrophils [25]. Interestingly, a similar delay in neutrophil apoptosis was reported in vitro following L. major phagocytosis by human blood or mouse inflammatory neutrophils [20,51–53]. In contrast 80–90% of mouse parasitized dermal neutrophils were apoptotic 12 hours after needle inoculation of L. major i.d., contributing to neutrophil efferocytosis by DCs [19]. These differences could be due to the origin of the neutrophils used in these studies. Here, 24 hours after L. mexicana inoculation at a time when parasite presence is at its highest, parasitized dermal neutrophils did not show increased apoptosis compared to non-parasitized neutrophils, suggesting that L. major and L. mexicana use distinct strategies within neutrophils to interfere with the launching of a protective immune response.
During the first weeks following L. mexicana but not L. major inoculation, only poor local recruitment of inflammatory monocytes and MoDCs was observed in agreement with a previous study [5]. We found enhanced and rapid recruitment of monocytes and MoDCs to the site of parasite inoculation in neutropenic mice and a reversal of this effect when wild type neutrophils were adoptively transferred into Genista mice. In neutropenic mice, the increased number of monocytes observed after L. mexicana infection was correlated with an increased frequency of MoDCs. Neutrophils were recently reported to contribute to NK cell activation [26] in line with the predominant presence of immature neutrophils in GAPDH patients and Genista mice at homeostasis [24]. Depletion of NK cells did not modify the high inflammatory monocyte and MoDC recruitment observed in neutropenic mice, suggesting that the low number of NK cells recruited in the ear dermis early after infection does not contribute to the observed phenotype.
Increasing evidence suggests crosstalks between neutrophils and DCs resulting in enhanced DC recruitment, activation or inhibition depending on the context, reviewed in [54]. Several mechanisms may explain why sequestration of L. mexicana, but not L. major by neutrophils impairs early recruitment of monocytes and MoDCs. Chemokines are playing important roles in the onset of immune response against Leishmania infection [55]. L. major-induced neutrophil secretion of CCL3 leads to the recruitment of inflammatory monocytes and MoDCs [41], a process which plays a critical role in the priming of a Th1 response to L. major infection [56]. Following L. mexicana infection, we show here that 3 days post infection ccl3 mRNAs is induced at the site of infection selectively in neutropenic mice. CCL3 may thus also contribute to the development of a protective immune response following L. mexicana infection in neutropenic mice. However, unlike what was previously reported for L. major, the source of this chemokine originates from other cells than neutrophils. Moreover, ccl2 and ccl5 mRNA levels were also induced specifically in the ear dermis of neutropenic mice. Interestingly, in addition to its role in recruiting monocytes and DCs, CCL2 was also shown to synergize with IFN-γ to activate macrophage microbicidal activity [57] and thereby the presence of this chemokine could further contribute to healing. Collectively, we show here that trapping of L. mexicana by neutrophils impairs the induction of monocyte and DC-attracting chemokine mRNAs at the site of infection, correlating with the poor monocyte and MoDC recruitment observed in response to this parasite 3 days post infection, and with the subsequent impaired Th1 cell differentiation.
Using 2-photon microscopy we further showed that parasite sequestration by neutrophils not only impaired DC migration to the site of infection but also their mobility and interactions with parasites. Parasites were phagocytosed by DCs in both neutropenic and control mice. However, considering the higher frequency of DCs recruited locally in neutropenic mice, the frequency of parasitized DCs is likely to be significantly higher in these mice. As DCs are crucial for launching adaptive immunity, our results reveal that antigen presentation and priming of the adaptive immune response is improved in the absence of neutrophils. Interestingly, the lesion size in neutropenic mice started to diminish shortly after the surge in IFNγ secretion in dLN cells. Full lesion resolution correlated with high IFNγ secretion and low IL-13 and IL-4 levels in dLN cells of neutropenic mice, suggesting an important role for IFNγ in this process. It is noteworthy that lesion size resolution was observed in both Genista and in mice only transiently depleted of neutrophils at the onset of infection. The latter demonstrates that neutrophils determine long-term disease progression by impacting events occurring during the first hours of infection.
Several studies reported that neutrophils can migrate transiently to the dLN after infection, injection of adjuvants or vaccination [15,58–62]. Following L. mexicana infection most of the impact on the immune response appears to result from early sequestration of parasite by neutrophils. Nevertheless, one cannot exclude that a low number of neutrophils that migrate to the dLN early in infection could also contribute to the impaired development of a protective immune response.
Collectively, our findings show that L. mexicana use neutrophils as a safe transient shelter. In addition, parasite presence within these cells or in association with NETs fails to recruit immune cells that are essential for the launching of an effective parasite-specific immune response and resolution of lesion size. These data reveal an unexpected role for neutrophils to promote chronic diseases suggesting that strategies to modify neutrophil behavior will improve the development of protective immune responses against Leishmania infection.
Materials and Methods
Mice
C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were purchased from Charles Rivers. Genista [24], LyzM-GFP [63] a gift from Prof. Sussan Nourshargh (Queen Mary, University of London), CD11c-YFP [64] a gift from Prof. Cornelia Halin (ETH, Zürich) and LyzM-GFP/CD11c-YFP mice were bred under pathogen-free conditions at the Epalinges Center. 5–10 weeks old females were used.
Ethics statement
All animal experimental protocols were approved by the veterinary office regulations of the State of Vaud, Switzerland, authorization 1266.4–6 to FTC and performed in compliance with Swiss laws for animal protection.
Parasites and infections
L. mexicana (MYNC/BZ/62/M379) WT,-DsRed (gift of Prof. Tony Aebischer, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin) and-luciferase expressing parasites were cultured at 26°C in complete M199 medium (10% fetal bovine serum, 4% HEPES, 1% PNS). Transgenic L. mexicana were cultured with hygromycin B (Sigma) at 50μg/mL. For infections, 1 x 106 metacyclic parasites were needle injected into the ear dermis in iDMEM in a final volume of 10μL. In PMN-parasites co-injection experiments, 106 negatively MACS-sorted BM-PMN (Miltenyi Biotec) and 106 metacyclic parasites were co-injected in a final volume of 20μL. For long-term experiments, lesion length and width were weekly measured using an electronic Vernier caliper and lesion score was calculated as described previously [65].
mRNA isolation and real-time PCR
Ears were harvested at the indicated times after infection, homogenized using a tissue lyser (Qiagen, Hildren, Germany) and mRNA was extracted as previously described [66]. cDNA was prepared as described previously [66] and quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR green on a LightCycler system (Roche). Primers for CCL2 (5’-TTAAAAACCTGGATCGGAACCAA-3’, 5’-GCATTAGCTTCAGATTTACGGGT-3’; GenBank Accession NM_01333), were used, and CCL3 and CCL5 were previously described [53]. The results were normalized to the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) housekeeping gene using the comparative threshold cycle method (CT) for relative quantification.
Generation of luciferase-expressing Leishmania mexicana transgenic cell lines
pGL1313 was linearized by Pme1 and Pacl restriction digestion, purified and used for electroporation using the Amaxa nucleofaector system as previously described [67]. Briefly, 7 x 106 L. mexicana promastigotes at logarithmic growth phase were harvested and resuspended in 100 μl Human T Cell Nucleofector Solution. The transfected cells were cloned by serial dilution in presence of 50 μg/ml of hygromycin B (Sigma). Clones resistant to the antibiotic were obtained and Luciferase expression validated by the determination of luciferase activity.
Neutrophil depletion
Six hours before and thirty-six hours after parasite inoculation, mice were given i.p. 150μg of the 1A8 mAb (BioXcell) that selectively binds to mouse neutrophils [68]. As a control, mice were given i.p. 150μg of the RR3-16 mock mAb directed against the Vα3.2 chain of the T cell receptor (gift from R. MacDonald, Ludwig Institute/UNIL, Epalinges, Switzerland).
Isolation of dLN and ear mouse cells
Infected ears and dLNs were isolated and processed to single cell suspensions. Briefly, ears were recovered, homogenized in iDMEM containing 0.2 mg/ml Liberase TL (Roche) for 2h at 37°C and then filtered using 40μm filters (Falcon). dLN cells were isolated and stained for flow cytometry analysis. For intracellular cytokine staining, 1 x 106 dLN cells were stimulated with 50μg/mL PMA, 500μg/mL Ionomycin and 1μg/mL Brefeldin A for 4h. Live parasites were determined by limiting dilution assay as described previously [15].
Cytokine production
106 dLN cells were cultured ± UV-irradiated L. mexicana promastigotes (MOI of 1:5) for 72h at 37°C. Supernatants were recovered and cytokine production analyzed by ELISA following manufacturer’s instructions. (BD Biosciences; R&D). IFNγ secretion was detected using a homemade ELISA kit as previously described [15].
Flow cytometry and MPO luminescence
Stained cells were analyzed using a BD LSR II-SORP system (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). The following mAbs were used: CD45-PerCPCy5, CD45-APC, CD8-APC, anti-IFNγ-PECy7 and anti-IL-4-FITC (BD Biosciences), Gr1-APC, CD11c-PECy7, CD11b-PB, F4/80-APC (eBiosciences), 1A8-APCCy7, Ly6C-FITC, 1A8-APCCy7, CD4-AF700. DAPI and AnV-FITC (BioLegends). In vivo bioluminescence imaging of MPO activity was quantified through injection of 200mg/kg luminol (Carbosynth) i.p. 10 minutes before luminescence acquisition. Photon emission was acquired for 10 minutes using a Xenogen IVIS Imaging system.
Intravital 2-photon microscopy
Mice were anaesthetized with 80mg/kg Ketamin and 8mg/kg Rompun. The ear pinna was spread with the inner side on top on a custom made stage heated to 37°C and processed as reported previously [69]. Intravital imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 710 NLO microscope equipped with a Cameleon Ultra II Ti:Sapphire 2-Photon laser (Coherent) tuned at 960 nm. Emitted fluorescence during concomitant GFP, YFP and DsRed imaging was read out using the descanned detectors of the microscope imaging at 500–520 nm, 525–555 nm, and 560–650 nm, respectively. Two-color YFP and DsRed imaging was detected with non-descanned detectors at 510–555 nm and 560–650 nm, respectively. Four-dimensional full-scale images were analyzed using the Tracking and Colocalization modules of the Imaris Software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland) and the ImageJ software. Tracking of DCs was performed on 20μm Z-projections, distances to the closest parasite were determined automatically for every DC position of the track.
Detection of NETs
3 x 105 negatively selected MACS-sorted (Miltenyi Biotec) mouse BM-neutrophils were seeded on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 37°C with L. mexicana-DsRed at a MOI of 5:1 (parasite:cell) or with PMA or LPS at 100ng/mL with or without 10μg/mL DNase for 4h at 37°C. Neutrophil purity was >95%. Cells were fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma) and stained using polyclonal Rabbit anti-Human MPO (Dako) and Alexa Fluor 488 secondary mAbs (Life Technologies). Coverslips mounted in DAPI mounting medium (Life Technologies) were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 510 META; Carl Zeiss). For NET killing assay, 105 neutrophils were incubated with L. mexicana-luciferase at a parasite-cell MOI of 5:1 with or without DNase as described above. Parasites treated or not with DNase were used as controls. Luciferase activity was measured using the luciferase assay system (Promega) and quantified using a MicroLumatPlus luminometer (EG&G Berthold).
NETs presence in ear pinna sections was identified as previously described [70,71],[72] on ears recovered 24 hours following infection. Briefly, immunofluorescence analyses were performed on 4-mm formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded mouse ear sections using polyclonal anti-MPO antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and appropriate secondary Abs labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Life Technologies). Propidium iodide (Life Technologies) was used for DNA detection. Specimens were mounted in fluorescence mounting medium (Life Technologies) and analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 5 EXCITER; Carl Zeiss). Total infiltration neutrophils and DNA-releasing neutrophils were counted in 10 consecutive fields for each specimen.
Statistics
All p values were determined with Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc.) using the Student’s t-test for unpaired data. 2-photon imaging data was analysed with a Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn’s post test. The degree of significance were indicated as: * p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. Sacks D, Noben-Trauth N (2002) The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to Leishmania major in mice. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 845–858. 12415308
2. Kaye P, Scott P (2011) Leishmaniasis: complexity at the host-pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 604–615. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2608 21747391
3. McMahon-Pratt D, Alexander J (2004) Does the Leishmania major paradigm of pathogenesis and protection hold for New World cutaneous leishmaniases or the visceral disease? Immunol Rev 201: 206–224. 15361243
4. Hsu AC, Scott P (2007) Leishmania mexicana infection induces impaired lymph node expansion and Th1 cell differentiation despite normal T cell proliferation. J Immunol 179: 8200–8207. 18056363
5. Petritus PM, Manzoni-de-Almeida D, Gimblet C, Gonzalez Lombana C, Scott P (2012) Leishmania mexicana induces limited recruitment and activation of monocytes and monocyte-derived dendritic cells early during infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001858 23094119
6. Weinheber N, Wolfram M, Harbecke D, Aebischer T (1998) Phagocytosis of Leishmania mexicana amastigotes by macrophages leads to a sustained suppression of IL-12 production. Eur J Immunol 28: 2467–2477. 9710224
7. Bennett CL, Misslitz A, Colledge L, Aebischer T, Blackburn CC (2001) Silent infection of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells by Leishmania mexicana amastigotes. Eur J Immunol 31: 876–883. 11241293
8. Rodriguez-Sosa M, Monteforte GM, Satoskar AR (2001) Susceptibility to Leishmania mexicana infection is due to the inability to produce IL-12 rather than lack of IL-12 responsiveness. Immunol Cell Biol 79: 320–322. 11488977
9. Shweash M, Adrienne McGachy H, Schroeder J, Neamatallah T, Bryant CE, et al. (2011) Leishmania mexicana promastigotes inhibit macrophage IL-12 production via TLR-4 dependent COX-2, iNOS and arginase-1 expression. Mol Immunol 48: 1800–1808. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.05.013 21664694
10. Contreras I, Estrada JA, Guak H, Martel C, Borjian A, et al. (2014) Impact of Leishmania mexicana infection on dendritic cell signaling and functions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e3202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003202 25255446
11. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, et al. (2004) Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303: 1532–1535. 15001782
12. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P (2013) Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 159–175. doi: 10.1038/nri3399 23435331
13. Bardoel BW, Kenny EF, Sollberger G, Zychlinsky A (2014) The balancing act of neutrophils. Cell Host Microbe 15: 526–536. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.011 24832448
14. Beil WJ, Meinardus-Hager G, Neugebauer DC, Sorg C (1992) Differences in the onset of the inflammatory response to cutaneous leishmaniasis in resistant and susceptible mice. J Leukoc Biol 52: 135–142. 1506767
15. Tacchini-Cottier F, Zweifel C, Belkaid Y, Mukankundiye C, Vasei M, et al. (2000) An immunomodulatory function for neutrophils during the induction of a CD4+ Th2 response in BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania major. J Immunol 165: 2628–2636. 10946291
16. Peters NC, Egen JG, Secundino N, Debrabant A, Kimblin N, et al. (2008) In vivo imaging reveals an essential role for neutrophils in leishmaniasis transmitted by sand flies. Science 321: 970–974. doi: 10.1126/science.1159194 18703742
17. Xin L, Vargas-Inchaustegui DA, Raimer SS, Kelly BC, Hu J, et al. (2010) Type I IFN receptor regulates neutrophil functions and innate immunity to Leishmania parasites. J Immunol 184: 7047–7056. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903273 20483775
18. Thalhofer CJ, Chen Y, Sudan B, Love-Homan L, Wilson ME (2011) Leukocytes infiltrate the skin and draining lymph nodes in response to the protozoan Leishmania infantum chagasi. Infect Immun 79: 108–117. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00338-10 20937764
19. Ribeiro-Gomes FL, Peters NC, Debrabant A, Sacks DL (2012) Efficient capture of infected neutrophils by dendritic cells in the skin inhibits the early anti-leishmania response. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002536. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002536 22359507
20. van Zandbergen G, Klinger M, Mueller A, Dannenberg S, Gebert A, et al. (2004) Cutting edge: neutrophil granulocyte serves as a vector for Leishmania entry into macrophages. J Immunol 173: 6521–6525. 15557140
21. Guimaraes-Costa AB, Nascimento MT, Froment GS, Soares RP, Morgado FN, et al. (2009) Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes induce and are killed by neutrophil extracellular traps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6748–6753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900226106 19346483
22. Gabriel C, McMaster WR, Girard D, Descoteaux A (2010) Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the antimicrobial activity of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Immunol 185: 4319–4327. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000893 20826753
23. Gross S, Gammon ST, Moss BL, Rauch D, Harding J, et al. (2009) Bioluminescence imaging of myeloperoxidase activity in vivo. Nat Med 15: 455–461. doi: 10.1038/nm.1886 19305414
24. Ordonez-Rueda D, Jonsson F, Mancardi DA, Zhao W, Malzac A, et al. (2012) A hypomorphic mutation in the Gfi1 transcriptional repressor results in a novel form of neutropenia. Eur J Immunol 42: 2395–2408. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242589 22684987
25. Blomgran R, Desvignes L, Briken V, Ernst JD (2012) Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits neutrophil apoptosis, leading to delayed activation of naive CD4 T cells. Cell Host Microbe 11: 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.11.012 22264515
26. Jaeger BN, Donadieu J, Cognet C, Bernat C, Ordonez-Rueda D, et al. (2012) Neutrophil depletion impairs natural killer cell maturation, function, and homeostasis. J Exp Med 209: 565–580. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111908 22393124
27. Abi Abdallah DS, Denkers EY (2012) Neutrophils cast extracellular traps in response to protozoan parasites. Front Immunol 3: 382. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00382 23248631
28. Guimaraes-Costa AB, DeSouza-Vieira TS, Paletta-Silva R, Freitas-Mesquita AL, Meyer-Fernandes JR, et al. (2014) 3'-nucleotidase/nuclease activity allows Leishmania parasites to escape killing by neutrophil extracellular traps. Infect Immun 82: 1732–1740. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01232-13 24516114
29. Kimblin N, Peters N, Debrabant A, Secundino N, Egen J, et al. (2008) Quantification of the infectious dose of Leishmania major transmitted to the skin by single sand flies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 10125–10130. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802331105 18626016
30. Belkaid Y, Kamhawi S, Modi G, Valenzuela J, Noben-Trauth N, et al. (1998) Development of a natural model of cutaneous leishmaniasis: powerful effects of vector saliva and saliva preexposure on the long-term outcome of Leishmania major infection in the mouse ear dermis. J Exp Med 188: 1941–1953. 9815271
31. Titus RG, Ribeiro JM (1988) Salivary gland lysates from the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis enhance Leishmania infectivity. Science 239: 1306–1308. 3344436
32. Rogers ME, Ilg T, Nikolaev AV, Ferguson MA, Bates PA (2004) Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG. Nature 430: 463–467. 15269771
33. Rogers M, Kropf P, Choi BS, Dillon R, Podinovskaia M, et al. (2009) Proteophosophoglycans regurgitated by Leishmania-infected sand flies target the L-arginine metabolism of host macrophages to promote parasite survival. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000555. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000555 19696894
34. Rogers ME, Corware K, Muller I, Bates PA (2010) Leishmania infantum proteophosphoglycans regurgitated by the bite of its natural sand fly vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis, promote parasite establishment in mouse skin and skin-distant tissues. Microbes Infect 12: 875–879. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.05.014 20561596
35. Chagas AC, Oliveira F, Debrabant A, Valenzuela JG, Ribeiro JM, et al. (2014) Lundep, a sand fly salivary endonuclease increases Leishmania parasite survival in neutrophils and inhibits XIIa contact activation in human plasma. PLoS Pathog 10: e1003923. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003923 24516388
36. Mottram JC, Coombs GH, Alexander J (2004) Cysteine peptidases as virulence factors of Leishmania. Curr Opin Microbiol 7: 375–381. 15358255
37. Buxbaum LU, Denise H, Coombs GH, Alexander J, Mottram JC, et al. (2003) Cysteine protease B of Leishmania mexicana inhibits host Th1 responses and protective immunity. J Immunol 171: 3711–3717. 14500670
38. Pertuz Belloso S, Ostoa Saloma P, Benitez I, Soldevila G, Olivos A, et al. (2004) Entamoeba histolytica cysteine protease 2 (EhCP2) modulates leucocyte migration by proteolytic cleavage of chemokines. Parasite Immunol 26: 237–241. 15491473
39. Cotton JA, Bhargava A, Ferraz JG, Yates RM, Beck PL, et al. (2014) Giardia duodenalis cathepsin B proteases degrade intestinal epithelial interleukin-8 and attenuate interleukin-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis. Infect Immun 82: 2772–2787. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01771-14 24733096
40. Charmoy M, Megnekou R, Allenbach C, Zweifel C, Perez C, et al. (2007) Leishmania major induces distinct neutrophil phenotypes in mice that are resistant or susceptible to infection. J Leukoc Biol 82: 288–299. 17449725
41. Charmoy M, Brunner-Agten S, Aebischer D, Auderset F, Launois P, et al. (2010) Neutrophil-derived CCL3 is essential for the rapid recruitment of dendritic cells to the site of Leishmania major inoculation in resistant mice. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000755. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000755 20140197
42. Ribeiro-Gomes FL, Otero AC, Gomes NA, Moniz-De-Souza MC, Cysne-Finkelstein L, et al. (2004) Macrophage interactions with neutrophils regulate Leishmania major infection. J Immunol 172: 4454–4462. 15034061
43. Sousa LM, Carneiro MB, Resende ME, Martins LS, Dos Santos LM, et al. (2014) Neutrophils have a protective role during early stages of Leishmania amazonensis infection in BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunol 36: 13–31. doi: 10.1111/pim.12078 24102495
44. Webster P, JW IJ, Chicoine LM, Fikrig E (1998) The agent of Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis resides in an endosomal compartment. J Clin Invest 101: 1932–1941. 9576758
45. Liu GY, Essex A, Buchanan JT, Datta V, Hoffman HM, et al. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus golden pigment impairs neutrophil killing and promotes virulence through its antioxidant activity. J Exp Med 202: 209–215. 16009720
46. Eruslanov EB, Lyadova IV, Kondratieva TK, Majorov KB, Scheglov IV, et al. (2005) Neutrophil responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in genetically susceptible and resistant mice. Infect Immun 73: 1744–1753. 15731075
47. Barquero-Calvo E, Martirosyan A, Ordonez-Rueda D, Arce-Gorvel V, Alfaro-Alarcon A, et al. (2013) Neutrophils exert a suppressive effect on Th1 responses to intracellular pathogen Brucella abortus. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003167. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003167 23458832
48. Laskay T, van Zandbergen G, Solbach W (2003) Neutrophil granulocytes—Trojan horses for Leishmania major and other intracellular microbes? Trends Microbiol 11: 210–214. 12781523
49. Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S (2011) Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 519–531. doi: 10.1038/nri3024 21785456
50. Scapini P, Cassatella MA (2014) Social networking of human neutrophils within the immune system. Blood 124: 710–719. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-453217 24923297
51. Aga E, Katschinski DM, van Zandbergen G, Laufs H, Hansen B, et al. (2002) Inhibition of the spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophil granulocytes by the intracellular parasite Leishmania major. J Immunol 169: 898–905. 12097394
52. Sarkar A, Aga E, Bussmeyer U, Bhattacharyya A, Moller S, et al. (2013) Infection of neutrophil granulocytes with Leishmania major activates ERK 1/2 and modulates multiple apoptotic pathways to inhibit apoptosis. Med Microbiol Immunol 202: 25–35. doi: 10.1007/s00430-012-0246-1 22661217
53. Charmoy M, Auderset F, Allenbach C, Tacchini-Cottier F (2010) The prominent role of neutrophils during the initial phase of infection by Leishmania parasites. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 719361. doi: 10.1155/2010/719361 19884987
54. Schuster S, Hurrell B, Tacchini-Cottier F (2013) Crosstalk between neutrophils and dendritic cells: a context-dependent process. J Leukoc Biol 94: 671–675. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1012540 23250891
55. Teixeira MJ, Teixeira CR, Andrade BB, Barral-Netto M, Barral A (2006) Chemokines in host-parasite interactions in leishmaniasis. Trends Parasitol 22: 32–40. 16310413
56. Leon B, Lopez-Bravo M, Ardavin C (2007) Monocyte-derived dendritic cells formed at the infection site control the induction of protective T helper 1 responses against Leishmania. Immunity 26: 519–531. 17412618
57. Ritter U, Moll H (2000) Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 stimulates the killing of leishmania major by human monocytes, acts synergistically with IFN-gamma and is antagonized by IL-4. Eur J Immunol 30: 3111–3120. 11093125
58. Abadie V, Badell E, Douillard P, Ensergueix D, Leenen PJ, et al. (2005) Neutrophils rapidly migrate via lymphatics after Mycobacterium bovis BCG intradermal vaccination and shuttle live bacilli to the draining lymph nodes. Blood 106: 1843–1850. 15886329
59. Chtanova T, Schaeffer M, Han SJ, van Dooren GG, Nollmann M, et al. (2008) Dynamics of neutrophil migration in lymph nodes during infection. Immunity 29: 487–496. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.012 18718768
60. Maletto BA, Ropolo AS, Alignani DO, Liscovsky MV, Ranocchia RP, et al. (2006) Presence of neutrophil-bearing antigen in lymphoid organs of immune mice. Blood 108: 3094–3102. 16835380
61. Yang CW, Strong BS, Miller MJ, Unanue ER (2010) Neutrophils influence the level of antigen presentation during the immune response to protein antigens in adjuvants. J Immunol 185: 2927–2934. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001289 20679530
62. Yang CW, Unanue ER (2013) Neutrophils control the magnitude and spread of the immune response in a thromboxane A2-mediated process. J Exp Med 210: 375–387. doi: 10.1084/jem.20122183 23337807
63. Faust N, Varas F, Kelly LM, Heck S, Graf T (2000) Insertion of enhanced green fluorescent protein into the lysozyme gene creates mice with green fluorescent granulocytes and macrophages. Blood 96: 719–726. 10887140
64. Lindquist RL, Shakhar G, Dudziak D, Wardemann H, Eisenreich T, et al. (2004) Visualizing dendritic cell networks in vivo. Nat Immunol 5: 1243–1250. 15543150
65. Schuster S, Hartley MA, Tacchini-Cottier F, Ronet C (2014) A scoring method to standardize lesion monitoring following intra-dermal infection of Leishmania parasites in the murine ear. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4: 67. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00067 24904841
66. Weinkopff T, de Oliveira CI, de Carvalho AM, Hauyon-La Torre Y, Muniz AC, et al. (2014) Repeated exposure to Lutzomyia intermedia sand fly saliva induces local expression of interferon-inducible genes both at the site of injection in mice and in human blood. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e2627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002627 24421912
67. Misslitz A, Mottram JC, Overath P, Aebischer T (2000) Targeted integration into a rRNA locus results in uniform and high level expression of transgenes in Leishmania amastigotes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 107: 251–261. 10779601
68. Daley JM, Thomay AA, Connolly MD, Reichner JS, Albina JE (2008) Use of Ly6G-specific monoclonal antibody to deplete neutrophils in mice. J Leukoc Biol 83: 64–70. 17884993
69. Filipe-Santos O, Pescher P, Breart B, Lippuner C, Aebischer T, et al. (2009) A dynamic map of antigen recognition by CD4 T cells at the site of Leishmania major infection. Cell Host Microbe 6: 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.04.014 19616763
70. Yousefi S, Gold JA, Andina N, Lee JJ, Kelly AM, et al. (2008) Catapult-like release of mitochondrial DNA by eosinophils contributes to antibacterial defense. Nat Med 14: 949–953. doi: 10.1038/nm.1855 18690244
71. Yousefi S, Mihalache C, Kozlowski E, Schmid I, Simon HU (2009) Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Death Differ 16: 1438–1444. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.96 19609275
72. Dworski R, Simon HU, Hoskins A, Yousefi S (2011) Eosinophil and neutrophil extracellular DNA traps in human allergic asthmatic airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127: 1260–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1103 21315435
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2015 Číslo 5
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Human Cytomegalovirus miR-UL112-3p Targets TLR2 and Modulates the TLR2/IRAK1/NFκB Signaling Pathway
- Paradoxical Immune Responses in Non-HIV Cryptococcal Meningitis
- Survives with a Minimal Peptidoglycan Synthesis Machine but Sacrifices Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance
- Fob1 and Fob2 Proteins Are Virulence Determinants of via Facilitating Iron Uptake from Ferrioxamine