Deficient IFN Signaling by Myeloid Cells Leads to MAVS-Dependent Virus-Induced Sepsis
Although it is well established that the interferon (IFN) signaling pathway restricts infection by many viruses, the key cell types in vivo that contribute to this process remain poorly characterized. To address this question in the context of West Nile virus (WNV) pathogenesis, we infected mice that specifically delete the type I IFN receptor gene (Ifnar) in subsets of myeloid cells, including dendritic cells and macrophages. Remarkably, mice lacking Ifnar expression only in myeloid cell subsets rapidly developed a sepsis-like syndrome that was characterized by enhanced WNV infection and visceral organ injury and caused by massive proinflammatory cytokine production and complement activation. By using additional gene targeted deletion mice, we show that WNV infection triggered signaling through the RIG-I like receptor adaptor protein MAVS to cause complement activation, sepsis, and tissue damage. Indeed, liver damage was minimized in animals lacking specific complement components, or treated with neutralizing anti-complement or anti-TNF-α antibodies. Our results establish how type I IFN signaling in dendritic cells and macrophages restricts infection, controls inflammatory cascades, and prevents pathogenesis in vivo.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Pathog 10(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004086
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004086
Summary
Although it is well established that the interferon (IFN) signaling pathway restricts infection by many viruses, the key cell types in vivo that contribute to this process remain poorly characterized. To address this question in the context of West Nile virus (WNV) pathogenesis, we infected mice that specifically delete the type I IFN receptor gene (Ifnar) in subsets of myeloid cells, including dendritic cells and macrophages. Remarkably, mice lacking Ifnar expression only in myeloid cell subsets rapidly developed a sepsis-like syndrome that was characterized by enhanced WNV infection and visceral organ injury and caused by massive proinflammatory cytokine production and complement activation. By using additional gene targeted deletion mice, we show that WNV infection triggered signaling through the RIG-I like receptor adaptor protein MAVS to cause complement activation, sepsis, and tissue damage. Indeed, liver damage was minimized in animals lacking specific complement components, or treated with neutralizing anti-complement or anti-TNF-α antibodies. Our results establish how type I IFN signaling in dendritic cells and macrophages restricts infection, controls inflammatory cascades, and prevents pathogenesis in vivo.
Introduction
Type I interferons (IFN) are a family of antiviral cytokines that are produced early in response to viral infection [1]. RNA intermediates of viral replication are recognized by cytosolic and endosomal pattern recognition receptors (PRR), such as RIG-I-like receptors (RLR) or Toll-like receptors (TLR), which signal through adaptor molecules (e.g., MAVS, TRIF, and MyD88) and transcription factors (e.g., IRF-3 and IRF-7) to induce type I IFN expression and secretion. Type I IFNs bind to a heterodimeric receptor (IFNAR) and mediate pleiotropic effects downstream of a canonical Janus kinase (JAK)-Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway. This results in the induction of antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), activation of antigen-presenting cells, and regulation of cytokine and chemokine production (reviewed in [2]). Although IFNAR is expressed on all nucleated cells, individual cell types may respond differently to signaling by type I IFN, as evidenced by overlapping yet distinct transcriptional programs [3], [4].
CD11c+ cells are integral members of the mammalian innate and adaptive immune response. In the mouse, CD11c is expressed highly on dendritic cell (DC) subsets (CD4+, CD8α+, and CD103+), some macrophage (MØ) populations, and on selected CD8+ T cell subsets [5]–[7]. CD11c+ cells are professional antigen presenting cells that respond to viral infection through a number of PRR, including the RLRs. CD11c+ DCs process and present antigens, express co-stimulatory molecules, and secrete cytokines and chemokines that regulate cell migration, leukocyte recruitment, and activation of adaptive immunity [7].
West Nile virus (WNV) is a member of the Flaviviridae family of positive-stranded enveloped RNA viruses and causes neuroinvasive disease in humans and other vertebrate animals [8]. Mosquitoes transmit WNV and in the skin CD11c+ cells and keratinocytes are believed to be initial targets of infection [9], [10]. Infected DCs migrate to the draining lymph node (LN) where viral replication ensues, resulting in viremia and spread to other peripheral organs [11]. Viral replication in the skin and LN induces a local and systemic type I IFN response, which is critical for limiting WNV replication and preventing dissemination to the brain and spinal cord. Indeed, subcutaneous WNV infection of Ifnar−/− mice results in a rapidly fatal infection, which is associated with high viremia and altered tissue and cellular tropism compared to wild-type (WT) mice [12], [13]. Analogously, Mavs−/− mice, which lack RLR signaling, exhibit increased susceptibility to WNV infection in many tissues [14]. Recent reports also have observed that the control and regulation of WNV infection requires IL-1ß production [15]–[17], and that inflammasome activation synergizes with type I IFN signaling to suppress WNV replication.
The significance of cell type-specific responses to IFN in vivo in the context of the control of viral pathogenesis is not well understood. Prior experiments with WNV infection suggested that type I IFN signaling has distinct temporal functions in the development of adaptive immunity [18]. The generation of cell type-specific conditional deletions of Ifnar has allowed its role on specific cell types to be analyzed in the context of infectious, inflammatory, or neoplastic disease [19]. Studies have shown an enhanced susceptibility to mouse hepatitis (MHV) and norovirus (MNoV) infection in animals with conditional Ifnar deletions, and this was associated with greater viral burden and decreased survival compared to WT animals [20]–[22].
Here, we evaluated WNV pathogenesis in mice lacking Ifnar expression in CD11c+ cells (CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice) or MØ/monocytes/granulocytes (LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f mice). Remarkably, deletion of Ifnar in either CD11c+ or MØ/monocyte/granulocyte cells resulted in severe WNV disease that essentially copied the phenotype of the complete Ifnar−/− mice. Thus, the dominant antiviral effects in vivo of type I IFN signaling against WNV occur in myeloid cell types. Analysis of WNV-infected mice revealed preferential infection of Ifnar−/− myeloid cells, and this resulted in a syndrome of “cytokine storm”, which was associated with liver and kidney damage, and rapid death. Immunopathogenesis in WNV-infected Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice animals was mitigated by exogenous administration of TNF-α blocking antibodies, and the sepsis syndrome was associated with massive alternative pathway complement activation as tissue damage was improved in mice lacking the complement components C3 or factor B. Our experiments suggest that high levels of viral replication in WNV-infected Ifnar−/− myeloid cells can trigger uncontrolled production of proinflammatory cytokines and pathological complement induction and activation, which together contribute to a sepsis-like syndrome.
Results
CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, and Ifnar−/− mice are vulnerable to WNV infection
In vivo, WNV preferentially infects myeloid cells in peripheral tissues and neurons in the brain and spinal cord [23]–[25]. Given that DCs are targets of WNV infection, produce antiviral cytokines, and shape adaptive immunity, we hypothesized that type I IFN signaling in these cells orchestrates protection against WNV. To assess the role of type I IFN receptor signaling on DCs, we utilized CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, in which IFNAR expression is markedly decreased on CD4+ and CD8α+ DCs but maintained on other hematopoietic cells, including neutrophils, natural killer, T and B cells ([26] and data not shown).
Infection of Ifnar−/− mice with WNV resulted in 100% mortality with a mean survival time of 3 days, as reported previously [12]. Unexpectedly, infection of CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice resulted in essentially the same phenotype (Fig. 1A) with no difference in the mean survival time compared to Ifnar−/− mice. Although WNV-infected Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice rapidly deteriorated, clinical signs of neuroinvasive disease including limb paralysis, seizures, ataxia, or sustained tremors were not apparent. Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice were more vulnerable to WNV infection than Cre−Ifnarf/f littermate controls or CD19 Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, which lack IFNAR expression only on B cells. The decreased expression of IFNAR on CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f cells was confirmed in mice following WNV infection (Fig. 1B). Thus, the loss of IFNAR expression on CD11c+ cells resulted in a clinical phenotype after WNV infection that was nearly identical to a deletion of IFNAR on all cells. When we repeated a subset of experiments with LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, which delete IFNAR expression on MØ, monocytes, and granulocytes (data not shown), a similar rapid death phenotype was observed after WNV infection (Fig. 1A), with a minimally longer survival time (mean of 3.5 days) compared to the Ifnar−/− or CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice.
To determine whether the susceptibility phenotype of the CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice could be generalized to other arthropod-borne viruses, we infected animals with chikungunya virus (CHIKV), an unrelated arthritogenic alphavirus (Fig. 1C). CHIKV preferentially targets myoblasts, fibroblasts, and some MØ populations but is not reported to infect DCs [27]. As seen previously [28], Ifnar−/− mice infected with CHIKV succumbed to infection within 4 to 5 days. In contrast, the CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, or the Cre−Ifnarf/f littermate control mice failed to develop lethal CHIKV infection. Thus, selective deletion of IFNAR expression on CD11c+ or other myeloid cells did not make mice vulnerable to other viruses, even if a complete gene deletion did; these results are consistent with studies with the coronavirus MHV, which showed a partial lethality phenotype in CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice [20].
We next assessed whether the loss of IFNAR expression on CD11c+ cells impacted tissue viral burden to the same extent as that of Ifnar−/− mice. High titers (106 to 109 FFU/mg) of WNV were detected in the spleen, liver, lung, kidney, brain, and heart of Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice at 48 hours post infection (Fig. 2A–F). As expected, greater infection was observed in Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice compared to Cre− Ifnarf/f littermate controls. Similar trends in WNV infection were observed in the serum of Ifnar−/−, CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, and LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f mice at 48 hours (Fig. 2G). Flow cytometric analysis of immune cells from the blood of infected Ifnar−/− mice revealed intracellular WNV antigen in CD11c+ CD8+ cells, CD11c+ CD4+ cells, CD11b+ cells, and some CD19+ cells (Fig. 2H), consistent with an earlier report [12]. In infected CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, WNV antigen was detectable in ∼4 to 6 percent of CD11c+ cells, and in ∼8 to 13 percent of CD11b+ cells that co-expressed varying amounts of CD11c. In WNV-infected Cre− Ifnarf/f mice, viral antigen in CD11c+ cells from the blood was near the threshold of detection at 48 hours after infection. Thus, a loss of IFNAR signaling in subsets of CD11c+ cells created a more permissive intracellular environment for WNV replication.
Pathological analysis of tissues from WNV-infected CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice
Necropsy at 48 hours post infection revealed gross macroscopic tissue damage including hemorrhages, infarcts, and edema in the liver, spleen, and LN of Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice that was not evident in WNV-infected Cre−Ifnarf/f mice (data not shown). Histological analysis of visceral organs from Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice showed increased cellular infiltrates, coagulation necrosis, and tissue destruction after WNV infection of the liver, spleen, and draining LN when compared to the Cre−Ifnarf/f mice. However, little to no cellular infiltrate or tissue destruction was observed in the brains of any of the mice at this early time point (Fig. 3A–D). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) analysis confirmed greater numbers of dead cells in the liver, spleen, and LN but not in the brains of Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice (Fig. 3E–H). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to determine whether these phenotypes correlated with cellular infection. Despite the high titer (108 FFU/mg) of infectious virus in liver homogenates (Fig. 2B), we observed relatively low levels of WNV antigen staining in hepatic sections from Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice (Fig. 3I). We also failed to observe any obvious brain pathology in mice at 48 hours and this correlated with a paucity of viral antigen in tissue sections. In comparison, WNV antigen staining was more apparent in the draining LN and the spleen of Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice compared to Cre−Ifnarf/f mice (Fig. 3J and K). Combined with the flow cytometry data on cell subsets (Fig. 2H), our analysis suggests that the enhanced viral burden in Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice was attributable to preferential infection of Ifnar−/− CD11c+ cells. The high viral titers in some organs (e.g., liver and brain) showing little WNV antigen staining by IHC might be due to infected CD11c+Ifnar−/− cells that were retained in blood vessels; these animals showed a deteriorating clinical phenotype and were difficult to perfuse despite large volumes of saline administration. Overall, the histology revealed a high degree of tissue injury in lymphoid compartments of WNV-infected Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice that reflected enhanced infection of cells lacking IFNAR expression. Tissue destruction in some organs, however, did not appear commensurate with the level of viral antigen present in the tissue parenchyma.
Blood chemistry reveals extensive liver and kidney injury
To understand why Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice succumbed so rapidly to WNV infection, we analyzed their blood chemistries. At 48 hours after WNV inoculation we observed increased levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice (22.8 mg/dL and 32.4 mg/dL respectively, versus 15.5 mg/dL, P<0.02; Fig. 4A), serum creatinine (4.5 mg/L and 4.9 mg/L respectively, versus 1.5 mg/L, P<0.02; Fig. 4B), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (2,495 u/L and 1,110 u/L respectively, versus 334 u/L, P<0.02; Fig. 4C), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (4,070 u/L and 1,676 u/L respectively, versus 382 u/L, P<0.02; Fig. 4D), and decreased levels of glucose (70 mg/dL and 77 mg/dL respectively, versus 334 mg/dL, P<0.004; Fig. 4E), compared to infected Cre−Ifnarf/f mice. The elevated serum BUN and creatinine values indicate that WNV-infected Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice experienced acute renal injury. The elevated liver enzymes (ALT and AST) reflect acute hepatic injury, which could be due to direct viral infection (although not seen by IHC), immune-mediated injury, or ischemia. The observed hypoglycemia may be secondary to depleted glycogen stores, impaired gluconeogenesis, or increased peripheral glucose utilization that occurs during infection or sepsis [29]. Similarly elevated serum levels of AST and ALT and decreased levels of glucose were observed in WNV-infected LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, compatible with a syndrome of acute hepatic injury (Fig. 4C–E).
“Cytokine storm” in WNV-infected CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, and Ifnar−/− mice
To understand further the basis of organ damage in Ifnar−/−, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice after WNV infection, we measured serum levels of 23 pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines using a Bioplex assay (Fig. 5A and Table 1). At 24 hours after infection, we detected no difference in cytokine levels among Cre−Ifnarf/f, Ifnar−/−, and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice. However, one day later, we observed increased levels of most proinflammatory cytokines in the Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice when compared to the Cre−Ifnarf/f mice; 22 of the 23 cytokines in the panel were elevated in mice lacking IFNAR expression on CD11c+ cells (Table 1). Examination of the cytokine profile in the serum of LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f 48 hours after WNV infection also revealed an increase in 20 of the 23 measured cytokines and chemokines (Fig. 5A and Table 1). We detected 2 to 1,600 fold increases (P<0.0001) in levels of individual proinflammatory cytokines after WNV infection, which included vasoactive (e.g., TNF-α) and inflammasome-generated (e.g., IL-1ß) cytokines. The massive increase in multiple proinflammatory cytokines after WNV infection in Ifnar−/−and CD11c or LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f mice coupled with renal and hepatic injury and low viral antigen staining in tissues suggested a picture of sepsis due to “cytokine storm”. In comparison, relatively small increases in only six of the cytokines were observed in CHIKV infected Ifnar−/−and Cre−Ifnarf/f mice (Fig. S1 and Table S1).
We hypothesized that Ifnar−/− myeloid cells produced the high levels of proinflammatory cytokines in response to extensive viral replication and RNA pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) generation. To demonstrate that CD11c+ cells in vivo induced pro-inflammatory cytokines, we performed qRT-PCR analysis of CD11c+ cells isolated by antibody-coated magnetic bead separation from the spleens of Ifnar−/− mice; these cells had higher levels of IL-1ß, IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA and viral RNA compared to those isolated from Cre−Ifnarf/f mice (Fig. 5B).
MAVS-dependent induction of “cytokine storm”
WNV-infected Ifnar−/− CD11c+ cells produced proinflammatory cytokines, which suggests a linkage between uncontrolled virus replication and “cytokine storm”. A recent study suggested that in the context of LPS-priming, MAVS provides a second signal for inflammasome assembly and conversion of pro- to mature IL1-ß [30]. Consistent with our hypothesis that excessive levels of viral RNA in Ifnar−/− myeloid cells results in MAVS signaling and inflammasome activation, WNV-infected Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− double knockout (DKO) mice succumbed at a later time point compared to Ifnar−/− mice (4.3 days compared to 2.7 days, [13]) despite the absence of pathways that both sense and control WNV infection [13], [31]–[37]. Based on these results, we predicted that the absence of MAVS signaling in WNV-infected Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice would limit cytokine induction despite high levels of infection and viral RNA generation in permissive myeloid cells.
To test this hypothesis, we infected Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO, and WT mice with WNV and harvested serum at 48 hours. Analysis of viremia revealed ∼103 to 106-fold higher levels in Ifnar−/− (1.6×108 FFU/ml, P = 0.03), Mavs−/− (4.4×105 FFU/ml, P = 0.03), and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO (2.0×108 FFU/ml, P = 0.03) mice compared to WT (2.3×102 FFU/ml) mice (Fig. 6A). Among CD11c+ cells isolated from the spleen, a similar percentage of cells were infected with WNV in Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 6B). We next measured cytokine levels at 48 hours after WNV infection of Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO, and WT mice (Fig. 6C and Table 2). Only serum from the Ifnar−/− mice revealed the profile of elevated cytokine levels. Microarray analysis from the spleens of WNV-infected Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO, and WT mice (Fig. 6D) corroborated these findings. mRNA levels of cytokines associated with NF-κB and inflammasome activation (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1ß, and IL-33) were elevated in the spleens of Ifnar−/− mice compared to Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO, or WT mice. To further define the linkage between MAVS and cytokine production, we infected bone marrow derived DCs (BMDCs) from Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO, and WT mice. As anticipated, higher levels of WNV infection were observed in Ifnar−/−, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO cells compared to WT cells (Fig. 6E). At 24 and 48 hours, we detected lower amounts of phosphorylation of the p65 subunit NF-κB in Ifnar−/− BMDC (Fig. 6F). A deficiency of MAVS alone, however, did not reduce p65 phosphorylation substantially indicating the existence of MAVS-dependent and -independent (yet IFNAR-dependent) pathways for NF-κB activation after WNV infection. In the absence of both MAVS and IFNAR, there was noticeably reduced p65 phosphorylation, as well as lower levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, CCL5, and other ISGs (IFIT1, IFIT2, and IFIT3) mRNA (Fig. S2); these results in BMDCs were consistent with the decrease in NF-κB-dependent cytokines produced in Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO compared to Ifnar−/− mice. The elevated expression of IFIT genes in WNV-infected Ifnar−/− mice was not unexpected; even though IFIT genes are ISGs, their expression can be induced directly by IRF-3 [38], [39]. In Ifnar−/− BMDCs, the increase in WNV infection results in enhanced RNA PAMP generation, MAVS signaling, and IRF-3 nuclear translocation, which induces IFIT genes independently of the IFN signaling pathway.
Inflammasome activation in Ifnar−/− CD11c+ cells after WNV infection
We observed higher levels of IL-1ß in the serum of Ifnar−/− mice, which were absent in Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice (Fig. 6B). This observation suggested that PRR signaling through MAVS was required for inflammasome activation. Prior studies had established that NLRP3 is the key Nod-like receptor inducing IL-1β and restricting WNV infection in mice [17]. To test whether the increase in IL-1β levels observed in WNV-infected Ifnar−/− mice was due to excess triggering of the NLRP3 inflammasome, we used a MAb (MAR1-5A3) to block IFNAR signaling in WT or Nlrp3−/− BMDCs and mice. At 48 hours after WNV infection, Western blot analysis revealed reduced amounts of cleaved IL-1ß in the MAR1-5A3-treated Nlrp3−/− compared to MAR1-5A3 treated-WT BMDC (Fig. S3A) despite equivalent levels of viral replication (Fig. S3B). Consistent with this, blockade of type I IFN signaling resulted in enhanced mRNA expression of IL1ß (and other cytokines, IL-6, and TNF-α) in WT but not Nlrp3−/− BMDCs infected with WNV (Fig. S3C). In vivo, serum cytokine levels were higher in WNV-infected WT and Nlrp3−/− mice treated with MAR1-5A3 compared to those receiving the isotype control MAb (Fig. S3D). However, with the exception of IL-1ß and possibly IL-6, cytokine levels in WNV-infected MAR1-5A3 treated Nlrp3−/− and WT mice were similar (Fig. S3D and data not shown). Although inflammasome activation generates vasoactive cytokines, in the context of the enhanced WNV replication in Ifnar-signaling deficient animals, this did not contribute to visceral organ injury. Consistent with this, inflammasome assembly or signaling deficient animals (Nlpr3−/−, IL1r−/−, or caspase-1/11−/− mice) that were treated with MAR1-5A3 sustained similar gross and microscopic liver and renal injury compared to WT mice treated with MAR1-5A3 or Ifnar−/− mice (Fig. S3E–G, and data not shown).
TNF-α blockade prolongs survival after WNV infection in CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice
To assess whether the inflammatory response contributed to the multi-organ injury and lethality, we neutralized TNF-α activity (Fig. 7A). Administration of a TNF-α blocking MAb (200 µg), which inhibited both soluble and cell surface-associated forms [40], one day prior to infection increased the median survival time of Ifnar−/− (from 3 to 5 days, P = 0.002) and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f (from 3 to 8 days, P = 0.0009) mice. To support of our hypothesis that the multi-organ failure induced by “cytokine storm” contributed to disease in the Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice, we measured viral titers in the serum of anti-TNF-α and isotype control MAb treated mice (Fig. 7B). Viremia at 48 hours post infection was not different suggesting that the beneficial effect of anti-TNF-α therapy was not due to effects on viral replication. Analysis of blood chemistries at 48 hours after infection of the CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice following anti-TNF-α treatment revealed improved AST, ALT, and glucose levels that were not different from WNV-infected Cre−Ifnarf/f control mice (Fig. 7C and Table 3). Cytokine analysis at 48 hours after infection showed reduced serum levels of 13 cytokines following anti-TNF-α MAb treatment in both the Ifnar−/− and CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice (Table 4). Although reduced levels of IL-1ß and IL-6 were observed in Ifnar−/− mice after anti-TNF-α MAb treatment, five cytokines (IL-2, IL-12p40, GM-CSF, Rantes (CCL5), and MIP1-ß (CCL4)) that were decreased in CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice were not altered in Ifnar−/− mice. Thus, TNF-α blockade can reduce induction of most but not all of the proinflammatory cytokines, and this correlated with Cre+Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− animals succumbing to WNV infection less rapidly (Fig. 7A).
Alternative pathway of complement activation contributes to disease pathogenesis
Humans infected with Dengue virus, a closely related flavivirus, develop vascular leakage and sepsis syndrome and have evidence of extensive complement activation in their plasma and tissues [41]–[43]. Prior studies also have established that TNF-α regulates expression of complement genes in myeloid cells [44]. We hypothesized that complement activation and production of anaphylatoxins (e.g., C3a and C5a) might be induced by TNF-α and contribute to disease pathogenesis in WNV-infected CD11c-Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice. To evaluate this hypothesis, we first assessed mRNA levels of individual complement components in the spleen and liver of WNV-infected WT, Mavs−/−, Ifnar−/−, and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice. Notably, C3 and factor B (fB) levels were greater in WNV-infected Ifnar−/− mice compared to the other genotypes (Fig. 8A) suggesting that expression of key complement components was regulated via a MAVS-dependent pathway. We next examined complement activation in serum by assessing levels of complement proteins and split products by Western blot and ELISA. At 24 to 48 hours after WNV infection, levels of C3, fB, and their cleaved products of (C3-α2 and Ba) were higher in Ifnar−/− and CD11c-Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 8B). These results confirm the induction of key complement proteins and activation of the complement cascade in vivo. In contrast, C3 and fB cleavage products were decreased or absent in the serum of WNV-infected Mavs−/− or Ifnar−/−×Mavs−/− DKO mice at 48 hours (Fig. 8C), indicating that RLR signaling through MAVS was required for complement induction and activation. Consistent with a role for complement contributing to pathogenesis, liver injury at 48 hours was minimized in WNV-infected C3−/− and fB−/− mice given the IFNAR-blocking MAb MAR1-5A3 compared to similarly-treated WT mice. Analysis of blood chemistries after WNV infection of MAR1-5A3 treated C3−/− and fB−/− mice revealed normal AST and ALT values, compared to MAR1-5A3 treated C57BL/6 control mice (Fig. 8D), even though viremia and cytokine levels remained elevated (Fig. 8E and F). While liver injury persisted in MAR1-5A3-treated Mbl-a−/−×Mbl-c−/− DKO or C4−/− mice, indicating that disease was induced primarily by the alterative and not classical or lectin pathways of complement activation, glycemia was restored to normal levels. A partial phenotype also was observed in MAR1-5A3-treated C3aR−/− mice, which delete the receptor for the complement anaphylatoxin C3a: Cytokine (IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α) and liver enzymes levels remained elevated in the serum but glucose levels normalized (Fig. S4). In comparison, treatment of CD11c-Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice with neutralizing MAbs against C5 reduced liver injury and prevented hypoglycemia compared to animals administered isotype control MAbs (Fig. 8G). To link our findings showing TNF-α signaling and complement activation contribute to WNV-induced disease and sepsis, we assessed complement activation in WNV-infected CD11c-Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice treated with blocking anti-TNF-α MAbs. Lower levels of C3 and factor B split-products (C3-α2, C3a, and Ba) were observed in the serum and plasma of mice administered blocking TNF-α compared to isotype control MAbs (Fig. 8H and I). These experiments place pathologic complement activation downstream of viral infection, MAVS signaling, and TNF-α signaling and indicate that it contributes to the sepsis-like syndrome.
Discussion
Although the contribution of type I IFN signaling to the control of viral infection in vivo is established, its importance in specific cell subsets remains less well understood. We evaluated the function of type I IFN signaling in myeloid cells in vivo against WNV infection. We targeted these cells because prior studies had indicated that WNV replicated preferentially in CD11b+ and CD11c+ cells [12], [45]. A striking phenotype was observed after WNV infection of CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice, as these animals succumbed with a similar rate and kinetics compared to the complete gene deletion Ifnar−/− mice. In contrast, deletion of IFNAR expression only on B cells (CD19 Cre+ Ifnarf/f) showed a phenotype after WNV infection that resembled the Cre− Ifnarf/f mice. Viral burden in several organs of CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice was markedly elevated and approached that seen in Ifnar−/− mice. Our experiments revealed a dominant antiviral effect in vivo of type I IFN signaling in myeloid cells, either CD11c+ cells or MØ/monocytes/granulocytes. Pathological analyses showed preferential WNV infection of Ifnar−/− myeloid cells, and this resulted in “cytokine storm”, which was associated with liver and kidney damage, and rapid death. High levels of WNV RNA in Ifnar−/− myeloid cells triggered uncontrolled production of proinflammatory cytokines, pathological complement induction and activation, which together caused a sepsis-like syndrome. This phenotype did not occur universally: whereas 100% of Ifnar−/− mice succumbed to infection with the arthritogenic CHIKV alphavirus, no disease or lethality was observed in CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice.
The phenotype after WNV infection of CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice varies from that observed after infection with MHV [20] or MNoV [22]. In the MHV study, increased vulnerability was observed in LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice but it did not recapitulate that seen in Ifnar−/− mice. In comparison, deletion on Ifnar on CD11c+ cells resulted in only a subset (∼30%) of animals dying, and this occurred almost a week later. In the MNoV study, IFNAR-dependent responses in MØ and DCs limited viral infection but were dispensable for preventing lethal infection, as all MNoV-infected CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f animals survived in contrast to Ifnar−/− mice. Systemic cytokine levels were not measured in either study. Related to these findings, cell type-restricted deletion of Stat1 in MØ, monocytes, and granulocytes (LysM Cre+ Stat1f/f) but not DCs (CD11c Cre+Stat1f/f) resulted in enhanced lethality after Listeria monocytogenes infection [20], [21]. Higher levels of cytokines and chemokines were observed in Listeria-infected LysM Cre+ Stat1f/f mice, although they were lower than in infected Stat1−/− mice. Analogous to our studies, Listeria-infected mice lacking IFNAR expression on MØ also sustained liver damage. Thus, loss of IFNAR expression in distinct populations of cells can enhance pathogenesis of viral and bacterial pathogens, although the level of mortality and cytokine production can vary.
Our IHC and flow cytometric analysis of tissues and blood revealed that a demonstrable fraction of infected cells in CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice belonged to the CD11c+ subset. It remains unclear why only a fraction (∼5 to 10%) of CD11c+ cells were targeted; this could reflect a difference in vulnerability of DC subsets or a stochastic process. A similar phenomenon was observed ex vivo after WNV infection of Ifnar−/− BMDCs, in which a maximum of 10 to 20% of cells was infected even at high multiplicities of infection [35]. In comparison, CHIKV does not target myeloid cells for infection in mice [28], [46], and thus may not gain the same replication advantage in CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f animals.
Prior studies in Ifnar−/− mice with virulent or attenuated WNV strains revealed enhanced infection and lethality [12], [32]–[34]. While the susceptibility phenotype is related to the higher levels of WNV replication, the contribution of cytokines was not assessed. Although we measured high viral titers in the serum, organs, and brains of CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice, IHC revealed less viral antigen staining in the brain parenchyma than anticipated by the viral titer data. This suggested to us that (a) the high levels of WNV in brain homogenates could be due to infected cells in the intravascular space that were not removed despite extensive perfusion; and/or (b) although CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice rapidly succumbed to WNV, it might not be due to infection in the brain. Indeed, high levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß and other proinflammatory cytokines were present in the serum of CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice but not in infected Cre− Ifnarf/f mice at 48 hours. Vasoactive cytokines affect blood vessel permeability and vascular tone [47], [48], and could have limited perfusion in the CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice. Our results are most consistent with a model in which cytokine-mediated changes to the vasculature limited organ perfusion and resulted in high titers that reflect viral burden in blood rather than replication within the parenchyma of some tissues.
“Cytokine storm” reflects excessive cytokine production that occurs following infection with gram-negative bacteria or pathogenic influenza A viruses (reviewed in [47], [48]). Excessive cytokine production with vascular permeability changes also has been described for flaviviruses in the context of severe dengue virus infection in humans or IFN-signaling-deficient mice [49]–[51]. Our studies in CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice revealed that serum levels of twenty different inflammatory cytokines were elevated at 48 hours after WNV inoculation. Loss of type I IFN signaling on the CD11c+ or other myeloid cells affected viral tropism and resulted in dysregulated cytokine responses after WNV infection. Combining this with the likely changes in vascular resistance that affected perfusion, our results are compatible with a clinical picture of “cytokine storm”.
WNV-infected CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice developed marked elevations in serum liver enzymes and profound hypoglycemia, consistent with hepatocellular injury. Histopathological analysis of the liver in CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice revealed zonal coagulative necrosis with apoptotic hepatocytes. Similarly, in the spleen and LN marked changes in the organ architecture and cell viability were apparent. While viral antigen staining was present in lymphoid organs, it was limited in the liver, and suggested that end-organ damage was secondary to ischemia and/or toxic effects of cytokines rather than direct virus-induced apoptosis.
The high levels of IL-1ß in the serum of the WNV-infected CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice indicated significant inflammasome activation. WNV activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to produce mature IL-1ß, which helps control infection in the brain through a pathway that synergizes with type I IFN signaling [15], [17]. Inflammasome activation requires two signals: signal 1 induces transcription of IL-1β (reviewed in [52]) and signal 2 promotes assembly of a multi-protein complex that activates caspase-1 to cleave IL-1ß and IL-18 to their mature forms [53]. The high amount of IL-1ß detected in the serum of the Ifnar−/− and CD11c or LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice that indicates inflammasome activation during WNV infection occurs independently of IFNAR signaling in infected myeloid cells. The lower levels of cytokines in the serum of Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice establish that inflammasome activation following WNV infection occurs in part, via a MAVS-dependent pathway.
Recent studies in the context of bacterial infection have suggested a role for IFNAR signaling in inflammasome activation [17], [31], [32], [34], [54]–[57] and production of vasocative cytokines, including IL-1ß. Whereas in the context of Francisella tularensis and Listeria monocytogenes infection IFNAR expression was required for inflammasome activation [58], in our study, MAVS and not IFNAR signaling played the dominant role. In animals lacking IFNAR expression on CD11c+ cells, enhanced WNV replication produces excessive viral RNA PAMPs that are recognized by the cytosolic PRR, RIG-I and MDA5 [59]–[62]. This sensing event signals through MAVS to induce proinflammatory cytokines through inflammasome-dependent (IL-1§) and -independent (e.g., NF-κB) pathways. Accordingly, the combined absence of IFNAR and MAVS resulted in enhanced infection without early “cytokine storm”, with DKO mice succumbing to infection days later likely due to massive virus infection in the central nervous system. The importance of the NF-κB pathway in cytokine induction is highlighted by WNV infection studies in Irf3−/−×Irf7−/− DKO mice, which still showed evidence of liver injury (high serum AST and ALT) and over-exuberant cytokine production (A. K. Pinto and M. S. Diamond, unpublished results).
Consistent with our hypothesis that proinflammatory cytokines contributed to WNV-induced lethality in CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice, administration of a blocking TNF-α MAb prolonged survival but did not affect viral replication. Moreover, pre-treatment with anti-TNF-α MAbs resulted in lower systemic cytokine levels and less end-organ tissue injury at 48 hours after infection. Somewhat surprisingly, disruption of inflammasome activation in Nlrp3−/−, IL1r−/−, or caspase-1/11−/− mice did not affect WNV-induced liver and renal injury when IFNAR signaling was blocked. Analogous results were observed in Ifnar−/− mice treated with neutralizing anti-IL-1 ß and IL-6 MAbs (A. K. Pinto and M. S. Diamond, unpublished results). Thus, even though there was marked inflammasome activation in the context of “cytokine storm”, these cytokines were not primarily responsible for the severe clinical phenotype.
So how did TNF-α promote the sepsis-like syndrome associated with enhanced WNV infection of myeloid cells? Although high levels of serum TNF-α can have vasoactive effects that alter endothelial cell barrier integrity [63]–[65], our experiments suggest alternative pathway complement activation and possibly resultant production of C5a anaphylatoxin contributed to the phenotype. Liver injury was minimized in WNV-infected C3−/−, fB−/−, and C5-depleted mice lacking type I IFN signaling, indicating that tissue damage required activation of the alternative complement pathway. A survival benefit was not observed in WNV-infected C3−/−, fB−/−, and C5-depleted mice lacking type I IFN signaling (A. Pinto and M. Diamond, unpublished results), likely because of the rapid spread of virus to the central nervous system due to an absence of the protective antiviral effects of complement [66] and type I IFN [67]. Associated with WNV infection of CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f and Ifnar−/− mice, we observed massive activation of complement including accumulation of C3 and fB split products. The induction of C3, fB, and other complement proteins in the spleen and liver occurred after WNV infection in a MAVS-dependent manner. Indeed, in the serum of mice lacking MAVS alone or MAVS and IFNAR, we failed to observe the accumulation of C3 and fB cleavage products after WNV infection. These and other results place complement induction and/or activation downstream of TNF-α, possibly through direct actions on myeloid cells and/or hepatocytes. We propose a model for virus-induced sepsis-like syndrome (Fig. 9) in which infection in myeloid cells results in excessive viral RNA production, RIG-I and/or MDA5 recognition, MAVS signaling, NF-κB activation, proinflammatory cytokine production (including TNF-α), complement protein induction, alternative pathway activation, and complement anaphylatoxin production. Enhanced infection in myeloid cells could occur because of experimental blockade or genetic deficiency of IFNAR or through virus-induced immune evasion mechanisms; many human viruses target and disenable key components of the type I IFN signaling cascade [68]–[71]. As recent studies with bacterial sepsis models also suggest key roles for fB and complement peptides in mediating vascular leakage and hemodynamic instability [72]–[74], pharmacological blockade of C3a and C5a might mitigate the sepsis-like syndrome after viral infections, including the more globally relevant flavivirus, Dengue virus.
In summary, our data establishes that the selective loss of IFNAR expression on myeloid cell subsets results in an unanticipated rapid mortality following WNV infection, which was not observed when IFNAR was removed from CD19 cells or in other viral models, which still are restricted by IFNAR signaling pathways in other cells. An absence of IFNAR signaling in myeloid cells facilitated WNV infection and caused MAVS-dependent dysregulated cytokine responses that promoted induction and activation of the alternative complement pathway, which resulted in tissue injury. As different viruses antagonize IFNAR function by targeting distinct steps in the downstream signaling pathway including Jak1, Tyk2, Stat1, and Stat2 phosphorylation (reviewed in [75]), this model of infection and inflammation may be relevant in the context of other infections. Given these findings, targeted anti-cytokine and/or immunomodulatory agents may be a possible therapeutic option when sepsis is induced by massive viral infection in subsets of myeloid cells.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Washington University School of Medicine (Assurance Number: A3381-01). Dissections and footpad injections were performed under anesthesia that was induced and maintained with ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Mice
Wild type C57BL/6 mice were purchased commercially (Jackson Laboratories). Ifnar−/− mice were obtained from J. Sprent (Scripps Institute, San Diego CA) and backcrossed ten times onto the C57BL/6 background. CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, mice and Ifnarf/f were obtained from R. Schreiber (St. Louis, MO) and U. Kalinke (Hannover, Germany). The Ifnarf/f [76], CD19 Cre+, LysM Cre+, and CD11c Cre+ mice (Jackson Laboratories) were backcrossed using speed congenic analysis so they were 99% C57BL/6 as judged by microsatellite analysis. Mavs−/− and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice have been described previously [13]. Nlrp3−/−, IL1r−/−, caspase-1/11−/− mice have been reported previously [42]. C3−/−, C3aR−/− (gift of R. Wetsel, Houston, TX), C4−/−, factor B−/−, Mbl-a−/−×Mbl-c−/− DKO mice have been reported previously [77], [78]. All mice were housed in a pathogen-free mouse facility at the Washington University School of Medicine or the University of Washington and experiments were performed in accordance and with approval of federal and University regulations. Mice (8 to 12 week-old) were inoculated subcutaneously via footpad injection with 102 plaque-forming units (PFU) of WNV-NY or 10 PFU of CHIKV-LR.
Viruses and cells
The WNV-NY strain 3000.0259 (WNV-NY) used was isolated in New York in 2000 [79] and passaged twice in C6/36 Aedes albopictus cells. WNV isolate, TX 2002-HC (WNV-TX02), was titered by a standard plaque assay on BHK21 cells and working stocks were generated as previously described [14]. The CHIKV strain was isolated from an infectious clone of CHIKV La Reunion 2006 OPY-1 (strain 142, CHIKV-LR, gift from S. Higgs (Manhattan, KS)) [80] and was passaged in C6/36 Aedes albopictus cells. BMDCs were generated as previously described [81].
Analysis of IFNAR expression, cytokine production, and WNV infection
Forty-eight hours after WNV infection, blood was obtained by intracardiac heart puncture and spleens were recovered. Live cells were stained with MAbs specific for CD11c, CD8, CD4, Ly6G, CD11b, CD3, CD19, and IFNAR (Biolegend) to define cell types and determine IFNAR expression. To determine which leukocytes were infected with WNV, after incubating with MAbs against specific leukocyte surface markers, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Fixation and Permeabilization buffers (eBioscience), and stained with a combination of two mouse anti-WNV specific MAbs (WNV E16 and WNV E18) and a MAb against IFN-γ (Biolegend) [82]. All samples processed on an LSRII or LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The resulting data was analyzed using FlowJo (Treestar).
Measurement of viral burden
Forty-eight hours after WNV infection, serum was obtained by intracardiac heart puncture, followed by intracardiac perfusion (20 ml of PBS), and organ recovery. Organs were weighed, homogenized using a bead-beater apparatus, and titrated by focus-forming assay [83] on Vero cells. Infected cell foci were stained with a flavivirus-cross-reactive, chimeric mouse-human MAb (WNV E18, 1 µg/ml) [84] for one hour at 37°C and then washed. Foci were detected after the cells were incubated with a 1∶2,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma) for one hour. Staining was visualized by addition of TrueBlue detection reagent (KPL). Spots were analysis with a Biospot counter (Cellular Technology) using Immunocapture software.
Histology, IHC, and TUNEL staining
Eight to nine-week old Ifnar−/−, CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f, or Cre− Ifnarf/f mice were infected with WNV. Forty-eight hours later, mice were perfused sequentially with 20 ml PBS and 20 ml 4% PFA in PBS, and tissues were harvested and fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4°C. Staining (hematoxylin and eosin or for WNV antigen) of paraffin-embedded tissue sections was performed as previously described [85]. After blocking non-specific binding sites, sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-WNV hyperimmune rat sera [24]. Primary antibodies were detected with secondary HRP goat anti-mouse or rat IgG (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were counter-stained with To-Pro3 (Molecular Probes). For TUNEL staining, sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated by heating to 57°C for 5 minutes then incubated with xylene, 100% ethanol, 95% ethanol, 70% ethanol and distilled water. Cells were permeabilized in proteinase K (Roche) for 30 minutes. DNase (Sigma) treatment for 10 minutes was used to introduce nicks into DNA as a positive control. In Situ Cell Death Detection KIT, TMR Red (Roche) was used for Tdt-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and the manufacturer's protocol was followed. Cells were counter-stained with DAPI (Invitrogen) for five minutes. Slides were visualized using an Axioscope (Zeiss) microscope. Images were captured with an AxioCam HRm (Zeiss) and Axiovision Rel4.8 (Zeiss) software was used. The control and experimental images were collected and processed using the same instrument settings.
Cytokine bioplex assay
WT, Ifnar−/−, LysM Cre+ Ifnarf/f, CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f, Cre− Ifnarf/f, Mavs−/−, Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/−, Mbl-a−/−×Mbl-c−/−, C4−/−, C3−/−, fB−/−, or C3aR−/− mice were infected with WNV, and at specified times blood was collected and serum was isolated. The BioPlex Pro Assay was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (BioRad). The cytokine screen included IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-3 IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17, Eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, KC, MCP-1 MIP-1α, MIP-1ß, RANTES (CCL5), and TNF-α.
Blood chemistry analysis
Ifnar−/−, LysM Cre+Ifnarf/f, CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f, or Cre- Ifnarf/f mice were infected with WNV. At specified times, blood was collected by intracardiac heart puncture and serum was isolated. Prior to analysis all samples were treated with 1/2,000 dilution of ß-propiolactone (Sigma) for 30 minutes to inactivate infectious viral particles. Control experiments confirmed that β-propiolactone did not impact chemistry results (data not shown). The Diagnostic Laboratory in the Division of Comparative Medicine at Washington University performed the blood chemistry analysis.
Complement activation analysis
To obtain mouse serum, whole blood was clotted on ice for 20 minutes before centrifugation (10,000 g×10 min at 4°C). Fresh serum (15 µl, diluted 1/100) was mixed with an equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE Sample Buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). After a 4 minute incubation at room temperature (RT) the samples were heated at 65°C for 4 minutes. The samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE using Tris-Glycine running buffer and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked overnight with 5% nonfat dried milk in Tris-borate saline (TBS) buffer. Primary goat anti-mouse C3 (1/10,000 dilution; MP Biomedicals) or goat anti-human factor B (1/5,000 dilution; Complement Technology, Inc.) antibodies were incubated with the membranes for 1.5 hours at RT. After three washes with TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG (Sigma) was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After three washes with TBS-Tween 20, membranes were visualized using a SuperSignal West Kit (Pierce).
C3a ELISA
Anti-TNF-α or isotype control MAb treated CD11c Cre+Ifnarf/f mice were infected with WNV. At 48 hours after infection, blood was collected by intracardiac heart puncture into EDTA-coated tubes. Plasma was isolated and immediately added to microtiter plates that had been coated overnight with C3a capture antibody (4 µg/ml, BD Biosciences) and blocked with PBS and 1% BSA (Sigma) for one hour. Plates were incubated for two hours at room temperature, and after washing, C3a detection antibody (0.5 µg/ml, BD Biosciences) was added for two hours at room temperature. After washing, streptavidin-HRP (Invitrogen) was added for 30 minutes at room temperature, and the plates were developed with tetramethylbenzidine substrate (Dako) and H2SO4. The adjusted OD450 was determined by subtracting the OD450 value for each sample on blocked control wells analyzed in parallel. Titers represent the serum dilution yielding an adjusted OD450 value equivalent to three standard deviations above the background of the assay.
qRT-PCR
RNA was isolated from serum using an RNA isolation Kit (Qiagen) and measured by fluorogenic qRT-PCR using primers and probes (sequences available upon request) to the WNV envelope gene, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, and CCL5 using the One-Step RT-PCR Master Mix, and a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems).
MAb treatments
The anti-mouse TNF-α MAb CNTO-5048 and the isotype control MAb CNTO-1322 are rat/mouse chimeric monoclonal MAbs and were the generous gift of D. Shealy (Janssen R&D, Spring House, PA). The CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f, or Cre− Ifnarf/f mice were treated with a single intraperitoneal dose of 200 µg (∼10 mg/kg) one day prior to infection with 102 PFU of WNV-NY. Anti-TNF-α and the isotype control MAb treated mice were monitored for survival or serum and organs harvested at 48 hours for further analysis. To block IFNAR signaling, WT or specific KO mice were treated with a single 1 mg (40 mg/kg) dose of MAR1-5A3 or isotype control MAb (GIR-208) one day prior to infection, as described previously [18]. To block C5 function, CD11c Cre+ Ifnarf/f mice were treated with two 1.25 mg (50 mg/kg) doses of BB5.1 or isotype control MAb (GIR-208) at days −1 and +2 relative to WNV infection, as described previously [86].
Microarray analysis
Expression oligonucleotide arrays were performed on RNA isolated from spleen and liver tissues from strain and time-matched mock infected mice and WNV-infected WT, Mavs−/−, Ifnar−/−, and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO mice. RNA was prepared as previously described [13]. Raw data were loaded into a custom-designed laboratory information management system (LIMS). Data were warehoused in a Labkey system (Labkey, Inc., Seattle, WA) and analyzed using GeneData Analyst 2.2.1 software (GeneData Solutions In Silico, San Francisco, CA), and TIBCO Spotfire with Integromics. Raw microarray data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus under GEO Series accession number GSE39259 and also are accessible via the Katze Laboratory website (www.viromics.washington.edu) in accordance with proposed Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) standards. A student's t-test was performed to determine the genes that had different expression levels after WNV infection compared to mock infection for each of the four mouse strains.
Western blotting
WT, Mavs−/−, Ifnar−/−, and Mavs−/−×Ifnar−/− DKO BMDCs were infected with WNV at an MOI of 2.5 and harvested and lysed 48 hours later. WT and Nlrp3−/− BMDC were treated for 30 minutes prior to infection with 25 µg/ml of MAR1-5A3 or GIR-208 [87] and this was maintained throughout the assay. BMDC were lysed in RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% SDS, pH 7.4), with protease inhibitors (Sigma). Samples were resolved by electrophoresis on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Following transfer of proteins, membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk and probed with the following panel of primary antibodies: anti-WNV NS3 (R&D Systems), anti-mouse tubulin (Sigma), anti-mouse Ifit2 (gift of Dr. G. Sen, Cleveland, OH), anti-mouse STAT1 (Cell Signaling), anti-mouse IL-1ß (pro and cleaved forms, Abcam), anti-phospho-p65 (Ser536; Cell Signaling), and anti-ß-actin (Cell Signaling).
Data analysis
All data was analyzed using Prism software (GraphPad4, San Diego, CA). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed by the log rank test. Differences in viral burden, cytokine levels and blood chemistries were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. IsaacsA, LindenmannJ (1957) Virus Interference. I. The Interferon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 147: 258–267.
2. TrinchieriG (2010) Type I interferon: friend or foe? J Exp Med 207: 2053–2063.
3. ChoH, ProllSC, SzretterKJ, KatzeMG, GaleMJr, et al. (2013) Differential innate immune response programs in neuronal subtypes determine susceptibility to infection in the brain by positive-stranded RNA viruses. Nat Med 19: 458–464.
4. SchogginsJW, WilsonSJ, PanisM, MurphyMY, JonesCT, et al. (2011) A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature 472: 481–485.
5. CorbiAL, Lopez-RodriguezC (1997) CD11c integrin gene promoter activity during myeloid differentiation. Leuk Lymphoma 25: 415–425.
6. MetlayJP, Witmer-PackMD, AggerR, CrowleyMT, LawlessD, et al. (1990) The distinct leukocyte integrins of mouse spleen dendritic cells as identified with new hamster monoclonal antibodies. J Exp Med 171: 1753–1771.
7. VinayDS, KwonBS (2010) CD11c+CD8+ T cells: Two-faced adaptive immune regulators. Cellular Immunology 264: 18–22.
8. SutharMS, DiamondMS, GaleMJr (2013) West Nile virus infection and immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol 11: 115–128.
9. ByrneSN, HallidayGM, JohnstonLJ, KingNJC (2001) Interleukin-1[bgr] But Not Tumor Necrosis Factor is Involved in West Nile Virus-Induced Langerhans Cell Migration from the Skin in C57BL//6 Mice. 117: 702–709.
10. LimPY, BehrMJ, ChadwickCM, ShiPY, BernardKA (2011) Keratinocytes are cell targets of West Nile virus in vivo. J Virol 85: 5197–5201.
11. JohnstonLJ, HallidayGM, KingNJ (2000) Langerhans cells migrate to local lymph nodes following cutaneous infection with an arbovirus. J Invest Dermatol 114: 560–568.
12. SamuelMA, DiamondMS (2005) Alpha/beta interferon protects against lethal West Nile virus infection by restricting cellular tropism and enhancing neuronal survival. J Virol 79: 13350–13361.
13. SutharMS, BrassilMM, BlahnikG, McMillanA, RamosHJ, et al. (2013) A Systems Biology Approach Reveals that Tissue Tropism to West Nile Virus Is Regulated by Antiviral Genes and Innate Immune Cellular Processes. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003168.
14. SutharMS, MaDY, ThomasS, LundJM, ZhangN, et al. (2010) IPS-1 Is Essential for the Control of West Nile Virus Infection and Immunity. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000757.
15. DurrantDM, RobinetteML, KleinRS (2013) IL-1R1 is required for dendritic cell-mediated T cell reactivation within the CNS during West Nile virus encephalitis. J Exp Med 210: 503–516.
16. KumarM, RoeK, OrilloB, MuruveDA, NerurkarVR, et al. (2013) Inflammasome Adaptor Protein Apoptosis-Associated Speck-Like Protein Containing CARD (ASC) Is Critical for the Immune Response and Survival in West Nile Virus Encephalitis. J Virol 87: 3655–3667.
17. RamosHJ, LanteriMC, BlahnikG, NegashA, SutharMS, et al. (2012) IL-1beta signaling promotes CNS-intrinsic immune control of West Nile virus infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1003039.
18. PintoAK, DaffisS, BrienJD, GaineyMD, YokoyamaWM, et al. (2011) A temporal role of type I interferon signaling in CD8+ T cell maturation during acute West Nile virus infection. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002407.
19. PrinzM, SchmidtH, MildnerA, KnobelochKP, HanischUK, et al. (2008) Distinct and nonredundant in vivo functions of IFNAR on myeloid cells limit autoimmunity in the central nervous system. Immunity 28: 675–686.
20. Cervantes-BarraganL, KalinkeU, ZustR, KonigM, ReizisB, et al. (2009) Type I IFN-mediated protection of macrophages and dendritic cells secures control of murine coronavirus infection. J Immunol 182: 1099–1106.
21. KernbauerE, MaierV, StoiberD, StroblB, SchneckenleithnerC, et al. (2012) Conditional Stat1 ablation reveals the importance of interferon signaling for immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002763.
22. ThackrayLB, DuanE, LazearHM, KambalA, SchreiberRD, et al. (2012) Critical Role for Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF-3) and IRF-7 in Type I Interferon-Mediated Control of Murine Norovirus Replication. J Virol 86: 13515–13523.
23. SamuelMA, DiamondMS (2006) Pathogenesis of West Nile virus infection: A balance between virulence, innate and adaptive immunity, and viral evasion. J Virol 80: 9349–9360.
24. ShresthaB, GottliebD, DiamondMS (2003) Infection and injury of neurons by West Nile encephalitis virus. J Virol 77: 13203–13213.
25. XiaoSY, GuzmanH, ZhangH, Travassos da RosaAP, TeshRB (2001) West Nile virus infection in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus): a model for West Nile encephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis 7: 714–721.
26. DiamondMS, KinderM, MatsushitaH, MashayekhiM, DunnGP, et al. (2011) Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumors. J Exp Med 208: 1989–2003.
27. SourisseauM, SchilteC, CasartelliN, TrouilletC, Guivel-BenhassineF, et al. (2007) Characterization of Reemerging Chikungunya Virus. PLoS Pathog 3: e89.
28. CoudercT, ChrétienF, SchilteC, DissonO, BrigitteM, et al. (2008) A Mouse Model for Chikungunya: Young Age and Inefficient Type-I Interferon Signaling Are Risk Factors for Severe Disease. PLoS Pathog 4: e29.
29. MillerSI, WallaceRJJr, MusherDM, SeptimusEJ, KohlS, et al. (1980) Hypoglycemia as a manifestation of sepsis. Am J Med 68: 649–654.
30. SubramanianN, NatarajanK, ClatworthyMR, WangZ, GermainRN (2013) The Adaptor MAVS Promotes NLRP3 Mitochondrial Localization and Inflammasome Activation. Cell 153: 348–361.
31. DaffisS, SamuelMA, KellerBC, GaleMJr, DiamondMS (2007) Cell-specific IRF-3 responses protect against West Nile virus infection by interferon-dependent and -independent mechanisms. PLoS Pathog 3: e106.
32. DaffisS, SamuelMA, SutharMS, KellerBC, GaleMJr, et al. (2008) Interferon regulatory factor IRF-7 induces the antiviral alpha interferon response and protects against lethal West Nile virus infection. J Virol 82: 8465–8475.
33. DaffisS, SutharMS, GaleMJr, DiamondMS (2009) Measure and countermeasure: type I IFN (IFN-alpha/beta) antiviral response against West Nile virus. J Innate Immun 1: 435–445.
34. DaffisS, SutharMS, SzretterKJ, GaleMJr, DiamondMS (2009) Induction of IFN-beta and the innate antiviral response in myeloid cells occurs through an IPS-1-dependent signal that does not require IRF-3 and IRF-7. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000607.
35. LazearHM, LancasterA, WilkinsC, SutharMS, HuangA, et al. (2013) IRF-3, IRF-5, and IRF-7 Coordinately Regulate the Type I IFN Response in Myeloid Dendritic Cells Downstream of MAVS Signaling. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003118.
36. LazearHM, PintoAK, VogtMR, GaleMJr, DiamondMS (2011) Beta interferon controls West Nile virus infection and pathogenesis in mice. J Virol 85: 7186–7194.
37. PalP, DowdKA, BrienJD, EdelingMA, GorlatovS, et al. (2013) Development of a Highly Protective Combination Monoclonal Antibody Therapy against Chikungunya Virus. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003312.
38. GrandvauxN, ServantMJ, tenOeverB, SenGC, BalachandranS, et al. (2002) Transcriptional profiling of interferon regulatory factor 3 target genes: direct involvement in the regulation of interferon-stimulated genes. J Virol 76: 5532–5539.
39. DiamondMS, FarzanM (2013) The broad-spectrum antiviral functions of IFIT and IFITM proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 46–57.
40. ShresthaB, ZhangB, PurthaWE, KleinRS, DiamondMS (2008) Tumor necrosis factor alpha protects against lethal West Nile virus infection by promoting trafficking of mononuclear leukocytes into the central nervous system. J Virol 82: 8956–8964.
41. YamanakaA, HendriantoE, MulyatnoKC, SusilowatiH, GintingAP, et al. (2013) Correlation between complement component levels and disease severity in dengue patients in Indonesia. Jpn J Infect Dis 66: 366–374.
42. BokischVA, TopFHJr, RussellPK, DixonFJ, Muller-EberhardHJ (1973) The potential pathogenic role of complement in dengue hemorrhagic shock syndrome. N Engl J Med 289: 996–1000.
43. BokischVA, Muller-EberhardHJ, DixonFJ (1973) The role of complement in hemorrhagic shock syndrome (dengue). Trans Assoc Am Physicians 86: 102–110.
44. GoringK, HuangY, MowatC, LegerC, LimTH, et al. (2009) Mechanisms of human complement factor B induction in sepsis and inhibition by activated protein C. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C1140–1150.
45. PurthaWE, ChachuKA, VirginHWt, DiamondMS (2008) Early B-cell activation after West Nile virus infection requires alpha/beta interferon but not antigen receptor signaling. J Virol 82: 10964–10974.
46. TangBL (2012) The cell biology of Chikungunya virus infection. Cell Microbiol 14: 1354–1363.
47. TisoncikJR, KorthMJ, SimmonsCP, FarrarJ, MartinTR, et al. (2012) Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 76: 16–32.
48. WangH, MaS (2008) The cytokine storm and factors determining the sequence and severity of organ dysfunction in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26: 711–715.
49. DongT, MoranE, Vinh ChauN, SimmonsC, LuhnK, et al. (2007) High pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and loss of high avidity cross-reactive cytotoxic T-cells during the course of secondary dengue virus infection. PLoS One 2: e1192.
50. HoberD, DelannoyAS, BenyoucefS, De GrooteD, WattreP (1996) High levels of sTNFR p75 and TNF alpha in dengue-infected patients. Microbiol Immunol 40: 569–573.
51. ShrestaS, ShararKL, PrigozhinDM, BeattyPR, HarrisE (2006) Murine model for dengue virus-induced lethal disease with increased vascular permeability. J Virol 80: 10208–10217.
52. DavisBK, WenH, TingJP-Y (2011) The Inflammasome NLRs in Immunity, Inflammation, and Associated Diseases. Annu Rev Immunol 29: 707–735.
53. MartinonF, BurnsK, TschoppJ (2002) The Inflammasome: A Molecular Platform Triggering Activation of Inflammatory Caspases and Processing of proIL-β. Molecular Cell 10: 417–426.
54. ArjonaA, LedizetM, AnthonyK, BonaféN, ModisY, et al. (2007) West Nile Virus Envelope Protein Inhibits dsRNA-Induced Innate Immune Responses. The Journal of Immunology 179: 8403–8409.
55. KongK-F, DelrouxK, WangX, QianF, ArjonaA, et al. (2008) Dysregulation of TLR3 Impairs the Innate Immune Response to West Nile Virus in the Elderly. J Virol 82: 7613–7623.
56. TownT, BaiF, WangT, KaplanAT, QianF, et al. (2009) Toll-like Receptor 7 Mitigates Lethal West Nile Encephalitis via Interleukin 23-Dependent Immune Cell Infiltration and Homing. Immunity 30: 242–253.
57. WangP, ArjonaA, ZhangY, SultanaH, DaiJ, et al. (2010) Caspase-12 controls West Nile virus infection via the viral RNA receptor RIG-I. Nat Immunol 11: 912–919.
58. HenryT, BrotckeA, WeissDS, ThompsonLJ, MonackDM (2007) Type I interferon signaling is required for activation of the inflammasome during Francisella infection. J Exp Med 204: 987–994.
59. FredericksenBL, KellerBC, FornekJ, KatzeMG, GaleMJr (2008) Establishment and maintenance of the innate antiviral response to West Nile Virus involves both RIG-I and MDA5 signaling through IPS-1. J Virol 82: 609–616.
60. KellerBC, FredericksenBL, SamuelMA, MockRE, MasonPW, et al. (2006) Resistance to alpha/beta interferon is a determinant of West Nile virus replication fitness and virulence. J Virol 80: 9424–9434.
61. FredericksenBL, GaleMJr (2006) West Nile virus evades activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 through RIG-I-dependent and -independent pathways without antagonizing host defense signaling. J Virol 80: 2913–2923.
62. FredericksenBL, SmithM, KatzeMG, ShiPY, GaleMJr (2004) The host response to West Nile Virus infection limits viral spread through the activation of the interferon regulatory factor 3 pathway. J Virol 78: 7737–7747.
63. MatsukiT, BeachJM, KlindtRL, DulingBR (1993) Modification of vascular reactivity by alteration of intimal permeability: effect of TNF-alpha. Am J Physiol 264: H1847–1853.
64. SobeyCG, DustingGJ, StewartAG (1992) Tumour necrosis factor alpha augments the release of an endothelium-dependent vasoconstrictor from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 20: 813–819.
65. WalshLJ, TrinchieriG, WaldorfHA, WhitakerD, MurphyGF (1991) Human dermal mast cells contain and release tumor necrosis factor alpha, which induces endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 4220–4224.
66. MehlhopE, DiamondMS (2006) Protective immune responses against West Nile virus are primed by distinct complement activation pathways. J Exp Med 203: 1371–1381.
67. SamuelMA, DiamondMS (2005) Type I IFN protects against lethal West Nile Virus infection by restricting cellular tropism and enhancing neuronal survival. J Virol 79: 13350–13361.
68. RamachandranA, ParisienJP, HorvathCM (2008) STAT2 is a primary target for measles virus V protein-mediated alpha/beta interferon signaling inhibition. J Virol 82: 8330–8338.
69. AshourJ, Laurent-RolleM, ShiPY, Garcia-SastreA (2009) NS5 of dengue virus mediates STAT2 binding and degradation. J Virol 83: 5408–5418.
70. ValmasC, GroschMN, SchumannM, OlejnikJ, MartinezO, et al. (2010) Marburg virus evades interferon responses by a mechanism distinct from ebola virus. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000721.
71. SimmonsJD, WollishAC, HeiseMT (2010) A determinant of Sindbis virus neurovirulence enables efficient disruption of Jak/STAT signaling. J Virol 84: 11429–11439.
72. Huber-LangM, SarmaVJ, LuKT, McGuireSR, PadgaonkarVA, et al. (2001) Role of C5a in multiorgan failure during sepsis. J Immunol 166: 1193–1199.
73. CzermakBJ, SarmaV, PiersonCL, WarnerRL, Huber-LangM, et al. (1999) Protective effects of C5a blockade in sepsis. Nat Med 5: 788–792.
74. ZouL, FengY, LiY, ZhangM, ChenC, et al. (2013) Complement Factor B Is the Downstream Effector of TLRs and Plays an Important Role in a Mouse Model of Severe Sepsis. J Immunol 191: 5625–5635.
75. DiamondMS (2009) Mechanisms of Evasion of the Type I Interferon Antiviral Response by Flaviviruses. J Interferon Cytokine Res 29: 521–530.
76. Le BonA, MontoyaM, EdwardsMJ, ThompsonC, BurkeSA, et al. (2006) A role for the transcription factor RelB in IFN-alpha production and in IFN-alpha-stimulated cross-priming. Eur J Immunol 36: 2085–2093.
77. KildsgaardJ, HollmannTJ, MatthewsKW, BianK, MuradF, et al. (2000) Cutting edge: targeted disruption of the C3a receptor gene demonstrates a novel protective anti-inflammatory role for C3a in endotoxin-shock. J Immunol 165: 5406–5409.
78. MehlhopE, DiamondMS (2006) Protective immune responses against West Nile virus are primed by distinct complement activation pathways. J Exp Med 203: 1371–1381.
79. EbelGD, CarricaburuJ, YoungD, BernardKA, KramerLD (2004) Genetic and phenotypic variation of West Nile virus in New York, 2000–2003. Am J Trop Med Hyg 71: 493–500.
80. TsetsarkinK, HiggsS, McGeeCE, De LamballerieX, CharrelRN, et al. (2006) Infectious clones of Chikungunya virus (La Reunion isolate) for vector competence studies. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 6: 325–337.
81. SamuelMA, WhitbyK, KellerBC, MarriA, BarchetW, et al. (2006) PKR and RNase L contribute to protection against lethal West Nile Virus infection by controlling early viral spread in the periphery and replication in neurons. J Virol 80: 7009–7019.
82. OliphantT, EngleM, NybakkenGE, DoaneC, JohnsonS, et al. (2005) Development of a humanized monoclonal antibody with therapeutic potential against West Nile virus. Nat Med 11: 522–530.
83. ShanakaWW, RodrigoI, AlcenaDC, RoseRC, JinX, et al. (2009) An Automated Dengue Virus Microneutralization Plaque Assay Performed in Human Fcγ Receptor-expressing CV-1 Cells. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 61–65.
84. OliphantT, NybakkenGE, EngleM, XuQ, NelsonCA, et al. (2006) Antibody Recognition and Neutralization Determinants on Domains I and II of West Nile Virus Envelope Protein. J Virol 80: 12149–12159.
85. SzretterKJ, DaffisS, PatelJ, SutharMS, KleinRS, et al. (2010) The innate immune adaptor molecule MyD88 restricts West Nile virus replication and spread in neurons of the central nervous system. J Virol 84: 12125–12138.
86. MehlhopE, FuchsA, EngleM, DiamondMS (2009) Complement modulates pathogenesis and antibody-dependent neutralization of West Nile virus infection through a C5-independent mechanism. Virology 393: 11–15.
87. SheehanKC, LaiKS, DunnGP, BruceAT, DiamondMS, et al. (2006) Blocking monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse IFN-alpha/beta receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR-1) from mice immunized by in vivo hydrodynamic transfection. J Interferon Cytokine Res 26: 804–819.
88. CatonML, Smith-RaskaMR, ReizisB (2007) Notch-RBP-J signaling controls the homeostasis of CD8- dendritic cells in the spleen. J Exp Med 204: 1653–1664.
89. ClausenBE, BurkhardtC, ReithW, RenkawitzR, ForsterI (1999) Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res 8: 265–277.
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2014 Číslo 4
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- The 2010 Cholera Outbreak in Haiti: How Science Solved a Controversy
- Coxsackievirus-Induced miR-21 Disrupts Cardiomyocyte Interactions via the Downregulation of Intercalated Disk Components
- An Overview of Respiratory Syncytial Virus
- , , , Genetic Variability: Cryptic Biological Species or Clonal Near-Clades?