Toscana virus non-structural protein NSs acts as E3 ubiquitin ligase promoting RIG-I degradation
Authors:
Gianni Gori Savellini aff001; Gabriele Anichini aff001; Claudia Gandolfo aff001; Shibily Prathyumnan aff001; Maria Grazia Cusi aff001
Authors place of work:
Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
aff001
Published in the journal:
Toscana virus non-structural protein NSs acts as E3 ubiquitin ligase promoting RIG-I degradation. PLoS Pathog 15(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008186
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008186
Summary
It is known that the non-structural protein (NSs) of Toscana virus (TOSV), an emergent sandfly-borne virus causing meningitis or more severe central nervous system injuries in humans, exerts its function triggering RIG-I for degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner, thus breaking off the IFN-β production. The non-structural protein of different members of Bunyavirales has recently appeared as a fundamental protagonist in immunity evasion through ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation targets. We showed that TOSV NSs has an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, mapping at the carboxy-terminal domain and also involving the amino-terminal of the protein. Indeed, neither the amino- (NSsΔN) nor the carboxy- (NSsΔC) terminal-deleted mutants of TOSV NSs were able to cause ubiquitin-mediated proteasome degradation of RIG-I. Moreover, the addition of the C-terminus of TOSV NSs to the homologous protein of the Sandfly Fever Naples Virus, belonging to the same genus and unable to inhibit IFN-β activity, conferred new properties to this protein, favoring RIG-I ubiquitination and its degradation. NSs lost its antagonistic activity to IFN when one of the terminal residues was missing. Therefore, we showed that NSs could behave as an atypical RING between RING (RBR) E3 ubiquitin ligases. This is the first report which identified the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in a viral protein among negative strand RNA viruses.
Keywords:
Cysteine – 293T cells – Recombinant proteins – Luciferase – Immunoblotting – Ubiquitination – Ubiquitin ligases – Ligases
Introduction
Toscana virus (TOSV; Phenuiviridae family, Phlebovirus genus) is an emergent sandfly-borne virus mainly transmitted to humans by phlebotomine sandflies [1–3]. A large number of infections is asymptomatic, however, TOSV infection is the leading cause of meningitis or more severe central nervous system (CNS) injuries, such as encephalitis and ischemia during the summer season in southern Europe [4–5]. The viral genome is composed of the large (L), medium (M) and small (S) segments [6]. The L segment encodes an RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase, the M segment encodes the envelope glycoproteins (Gn and Gc) and a non-structural protein (NSm) and the S segment encodes a nucleocapsid (N) protein and a non-structural (NSs) protein [6, 7, 8, 9]. The NSs protein of some members of the Phenuiviridae family represents an important virulence factor being a potent antagonist of type I interferons (IFN-α/β), the main protagonists of the host innate immunity against viral infections. The signaling pathway leading to the secretion of IFN-β and the establishment of an antiviral state are achieved by the induction of the cytoplasmic viral sensors RIG-I (Retinoic-acid Inducible Gene I) and MDA-5 (Melanoma Differentiation Associated gene-5) able to recognize dsRNA molecules generated during viral replication [10]. In order to overcome this first-line defense implemented by the host, viruses have evolved protein(s) able to block IFN-β production and its downstream activity at different steps in the signaling cascade. Among Bunyavirales, Toscana virus (TOSV), the Bunyamwera Virus (BUNV), La Crosse Virus (LACV), Sin Nombre (SNV), Tula (TULV) and Puumala (PUUV) Hantaviruses, Rift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV) and Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus (SFTSV), express the NSs protein acting as a suppressor of IFNs [11–21]. Along with this evidence, previous studies have shown that TOSV NSs could exert its function by triggering RIG-I for degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner, thus breaking off the IFN-β production and blocking the establishment of an efficient antiviral state [21, 22]. The proteasomal degradation of proteins by ubiquitination is a process consisting of a covalent attachment of ubiquitin to target proteins. The molecular machinery which leads to the assembly and linkage of poly-Ub chains to the target protein consists of three enzymes defined as ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2) and ubiquitin-ligases (E3), which work sequentially in a cascade. In this context, the E3 ubiquitin ligase is the only enzyme which confers specificity to this system by recognizing a selected target protein [23, 24, 25]. E3 ligases are distinguished in RING (Really Interesting New Gene), HECT (Homologous to the E6-AP Carboxy Terminus) and RBR (RING Between RING). A notable distinction in the mechanism among the classes is that RING E3 catalyzes a direct transfer of ubiquitin from E2 to the target protein, whereas a transfer of ubiquitin by HECT E3 involves an intermediate step where the ubiquitin is first transferred from E2 to an active cysteine residue on HECT E3 ligase, then it is conjugated to the target protein [26–35]. RBR combines properties of RING and HECT E3s to conjugate Ub to target proteins. [32]. Based on the linkage generated between ubiquitin moieties, the cognate proteins undergo regulation of their physiological functions, although the role of some chains is still elusive [36–41]. The non-structural protein of different members of Bunyavirales has recently appeared as a fundamental protagonist in virus replication and immunity evasion through ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation [22, 42–45]. To better understand the interaction between the ubiquitin system and TOSV NSs, we investigated whether this viral protein could be responsible for ubiquitin modifications of specific targets. In this study, we showed that TOSV NSs has an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity mapping at the carboxy- and the amino-terminal domains of the protein. Indeed, it appears to promote the transfer of ubiquitin to RIG-I, thus favoring its proteasome-dependent proteolysis. During the course of evolution and adaptation, many of the large DNA viruses have shown to encode their own Ub modifying machinery to facilitate viral replication through regulating immune responses. Here, we present the first report which identifies the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in a viral protein among negative-strand RNA viruses, to mediate host–virus interactions.
Results
NSs and RIG-I expression in Toscana virus infected cells
Previous results have shown that TOSV was able to induce a RIG-I-mediated IFN-β expression in infected cells, likely because NSs was expressed at a low level and relatively late during the viral replication cycle [18]. Therefore, only the in vitro over-expression of NSs could evidence its properties mediating a decrease of RIG-I, due to the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of RIG-I after their interaction [21]. To better characterize the role of NSs during TOSV infection, the IFN-β competent cell line, Lenti-X 293T, was infected and analysed. The immunoblotting evaluating the expression of endogenous RIG-I performed on cell lysates of mock-infected, TOSV infected, or poly(I:C) stimulated cells showed that RIG-I was induced as revealed at 24h and 48h post-infection (p.i.), alongside with the NSs protein. To better address whether the lack of endogenous RIG-I degradation in TOSV infected cells was due to the low amount of the non structural protein in the early phase of replication, an over-expression of NSs was performed by transient transfection in infected cells. The immunoblotting of these cell lysates confirmed that the level of endogenous RIG-I was reduced in the presence of a higher amount of NSs (S1 Fig, S1 Dataset). Therefore, as previously reported [18], we might hypothesize that the fast replication of TOSV was able to trigger an early innate immune response by inducing IFNs, and that the NSs protein could not counteract this effect, as it was produced later during the virus replication cycle. (S1 Fig, S1 Dataset). As expected, stimulation with poly(I:C) strongly induced cellular accumulation of RIG-I in the selected cell line and the over-expression of TOSV NSs was able to contrast poly(I:C) effects (S1 Fig, S1 Dataset).
NSs contains an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in vitro
Previous results [18, 21, 22] have shown that TOSV NSs presented inhibitory properties versus the IFN-β mediated immune response. In particular, RIG-I was targeted for proteasomal-degradation through the action of NSs, and its functional activity was related to the carboxyl-terminus of the protein itself [22], however, assuming that other domains could also be involved. Therefore, we also tested the activity of the amino-terminus (71 aa.) deleted NSs protein (NSsΔN) (S2 Fig) towards RIG-I. Surprisingly, we found a behavior similar to the one observed for the carboxy-terminus deleted NSs (NSsΔC). NSsΔN significantly lost its degrading activity on RIG-I upon co-transfection of cells with the respective plasmids (Fig 1A, S2 Dataset). Moreover, RIG-I-mediated IFN-β promoter activation was not affected by NSsΔN, as shown by the luciferase reporter assay (p = 0.638) (Fig 1A, S2 Dataset). Since the treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 reversed RIG-I degradation by NSs [21], the possibility of a ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation was evaluated. A growing number of viruses was found to weaponize the ubiquitin modification system to suppress IFN [11–21]. Thus, looking for a tool to identify a functional site of the protein, we submitted the NSs protein sequence to the Phyre2 prediction software (www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi) [46], which provided an alignment of 15 residues (aa. 277–292) and a confidence of 30.7% between NSs and RNF31, the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Considering the potentiality of NSs both to act as an E3 ligase and its ability to induce proteasome degradation of RIG-I, we investigated whether TOSV NSs could have this activity in vitro. The His-tagged recombinant NSs protein was produced in bacteria, purified and tested for the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, as described in Materials and Methods. In such reactions, the ability of a protein to promote a ubiquitin-protein ligation was indicative of an E3 ligase activity. For this purpose, an in vitro biochemical assay was performed with E1, E2, rNSs and recombinant full-length RIG-I (FL-rRIG-I). When the wt-NSs was used as a source of E3 Ub ligase in the assay, a shift in RIG-I molecular weight, corresponding to its ubiquitinated form, was revealed by immunoblotting using anti-Ub or anti-RIG-I antibodies (S3 Fig). In subsequent experiments, the recombinant N-terminus of RIG-I containing two tandem-repeated CAspase Recruitment Domains (CARDs), necessary and sufficient to activate RIG-I and induce the recruitment of downstream signaling molecules, were tested. Likewise, when the E3 Ub ligase was substituted by the wt-NSs in the assay, higher molecular weight ubiquitinated bands were revealed by immunoblotting on rRIG-I CARDs, using anti-Ub or anti-RIG-I antibodies (Fig 1B). In order to better evaluate which domain of NSs could have a role in the ubiquitination process, the His-tagged recombinant NSs protein, NSsΔC and NSsΔN deleted proteins were produced in bacteria, purified and tested for the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Ubiquitinated rRIG-I CARDs bands were not present when NSsΔC, NSsΔN or TOSV nucleocapsid (N) proteins were added in place of NSs (Fig 1B), indicating that NSs possessed an E3 Ub ligase activity directed to RIG-I. Furthermore, as this activity was not observed in deletion mutants, it was likely located in the amino- and carboxy-terminus regions. In the attempt to investigate the potential substrate specificity of TOSV NSs protein, we tested NSs with the recombinant human p53 protein, known to be ubiquitinated by many different E3 ligases. The co-expression of NSs and p53 plasmids in cells did not reveal any decrease of the p53 protein, in comparison with the control represented by cells transfected with p53 plasmid alone, as evidenced by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence (Fig 1C). Moreover, in biochemical assays, p53 was ubiquitinated by Mdm2 E3 Ub ligase, and not by NSs (Fig 1C), indicating that its activity appeared to be target specific. Finally, ubiquitinated products were not detected in the negative controls, when E3 ubiquitin ligase was omitted or substituted by TOSV N protein in the reaction (Fig 1C).
E3 ubiquitin ligase activity is associated with the C-terminus of NSs
In order to confirm whether NSs E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, required for targeting RIG-I to proteasomal degradation, mapped to the C-terminal sequence of the NSs, we adopted a ‘twist’ strategy and constructed a TOSV-Sandfly Fever Naples Virus (SFNV) NSs chimeric protein. Toscana virus and Sandfly Fever Naples virus (SFNV) belong to the same viral genus and share a high sequence homology in the non-structural protein (54%) (S4 Fig). However, SFNV NSs lacks the last 78 aa, present in TOSV NSs. Since this domain was proved to be strikingly associated to TOSV NSs degrading activity on RIG-I [22], we generated a chimeric SFNV NSs (cSFNV) protein by fusing the C-terminus of TOSV NSs onto the NSs of the related SFNV. In comparison with TOSV NSs, SFNV NSs was well expressed in transfected cells and did not show any RIG-I-mediated IFN-β inhibition, since unable to mediate RIG-I degradation (p = 0.166) (Fig 2A and 2B). Thus, we supposed that the addition of TOSV C-terminus to SFNV NSs could confer new properties to this protein. Analysing the cSFNV NSs expression by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting, no significant difference was evidenced with the wild-type counterpart (p = 0.255) (Fig 2A). On the other hand, the addition of a partial TOSV sequence completely altered the SFNV NSs function. Indeed, an evident decrease of RIG-I was revealed in cSFNV and FLAG-RIG-I plasmids transfected cells, showing few RIG-I positive cells by immunofluorescence (p = 0.00006) and a faint band of RIG-I by immunoblotting (Fig 2A, S3 Dataset). Furthermore, the newly acquired IFN-β antagonistic property of cSFNV NSs was confirmed by luciferase reporter assay, demonstrating a strong inhibition of RIG-I-mediated IFN-β promoter activation (Fig 2B) and endorsing the hypothesis of an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity related to the C-terminal domain of TOSV NSs. This data was also supported by the in vitro ubiquitination assay of rRIG-I CARDs in the presence of the recombinant cSFNV NSs protein. As shown in Fig 2C, rRIG-I CARDs were ubiquitinated when the chimeric protein was added in the reaction, in place of the E3 Ub ligase. On the contrary, SFNV NSs protein did not have any effect on rRIG-I CARDs (Fig 2C). Moreover, the mass spectrometry, performed on the products of the in vitro ubiquitination reactions, identified RIG-I CARDs ubiquitinated at the lysine residues 115 and 172 (S5 Fig). Since Ub-CARDs specific peptides were only identified in the wt-NSs and cSFNV containing samples, the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of TOSV NSs and the incisive role of its C-terminal domain were further confirmed.
Cysteine 27 at the N-terminus of NSs is also involved in the ubiquitination process
Since we have demonstrated that NSsΔC and NSsΔN did not have any inhibitory activity to RIG-I mediated IFN-β promoter activation (Fig 1A), we hypothesized that both the C- and N-terminus of NSs might be involved in the ubiquitination of RIG-I. We suspected that NSs could behave such as an RBR E3 Ub ligase, which transfers ubiquitin to a catalytic cysteine on the E3 ligase and then to the substrate. Therefore, a mass spectrometry analysis was performed on the wt-NSs protein, recovered from transfected Lenti-X 293T cells, to see whether a cysteine of NSs was ubiquitinated. The analysis revealed a ubiquitinated cysteine at position 27, in the N-terminal of TOSV protein (S6 Fig). In the recent years, several new modes of ubiquitin chain attachment have emerged and even the thiol groups of cysteine residues could be employed as sites of ubiquitination [47]. However, the potential importance of this ‘non-canonical ubiquitination’ and its roles still need to be elucidated [48]. Therefore, in order to understand the role of this cysteine in the ubiquitination process, we mutated Cys27 to Gly in the wt-NSs and tested the new construct in the in vitro ubiquitination assay of rRIG-I CARDs. rNSs-C27G was unable to ubiquitinate rRIG-I CARDs (S7 Fig) and the result was supported by immunofluorescence, immunoblotting (Fig 3A, S4 Dataset) and luciferase assays (Fig 3B), which revealed a behaviour of rNSs-C27G similar to the one observed for NSsΔN and NSsΔC, and indicated the fundamental role elicited by this amino-acid, interfering with cell signaling. Therefore, this result also validated the involvement of the NSs N-terminus in the ubiquitination process.
Discussion
Innate immunity is fundamental to protect host cells against pathogens. In turn, viruses have developed different strategies to counteract host innate immune response [11–21, 42–45]. New mechanisms of viral evasion of host immune response, exploiting the ubiquitin system, have recently been described. Indeed, some viruses encode proteins that manipulate the ubiquitin pathway, inhibiting the immune signaling and forwarding the degradation of host proteins [49–53]. Examples are provided by members of the Herpesviridae family; Varicella Zoster virus (VZV) encodes ORF61 containing a RING domain, which inhibits the IFN expression, by targeting IRF3 degradation [54]. Similarly, Herpes virus type 1 (HSV-1) has a RING domain in the ICP0 protein that confers E3Ub ligase activity for the degradation of host proteins involved in the innate immunity [55]. Poxviruses behave in a similar way [56]. Thus, ubiquitination has an important role in regulating signal transduction during the immune response [53, 57, 58]. Although viral E3 Ub ligases have been identified in large DNA viruses, some RNA viruses have developed mechanisms to interact with host molecules involved in the ubiquitination pathway. Influenza NS1 protein binds and inactivates the TRIM-25 and Riplet E3 ubiquitin ligase, preventing the downstream activation by K63 poly-Ub chain moiety of RIG-I [59, 60, 61]. Likewise, the Paramyxovirus V protein interacts with RIG-I/TRIM-25 regulatory complex by inhibiting RIG-I signaling [62]. Hepatitis C virus NS3-4A protein targets Riplet for degradation [57]; Rotavirus NSP1 triggers the degradation of targets by hijacking a subset of E3 Ub ligases, the cullin-RING ligases [63]. Among Phenuiviridae members, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is the most investigated virus for the antagonistic effects of its NSs protein on the innate immune response and recently, the involvement of ubiquitin system, particularly the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, has been elucidated [44, 58]. Ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of p62 subunit of the transcription factor TFIIH is a consequence of the interaction between RVFV NSs and the F-box protein FBXO3-SKP1-Cullin1/7 SCF multi-protein complex [43]. Furthermore, RVFV NSs is able to recruit the F-box protein FBXW11 and induce ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the antiviral protein PKR [44, 58]. In this study, we have shown how TOSV NSs protein was inducing RIG-I degradation upon their binding [21]. In particular, TOSV NSs revealed an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity related to both the carboxy- and amino-terminal domains of the protein, promoting the transfer of ubiquitin to RIG-I and favoring its proteasome-dependent proteolysis. Indeed, TOSV NSs mutants, such as those deleted at the amino- or carboxy-terminal (NSsΔN, NSsΔC), unlike wt-NSs, were not able to activate IFN induction. This data conferred a new role to the protein terminal sequences and suggested an involvement of these protein regions in the E3 ligase activity. Initially, an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity appeared to be localized at the NSs carboxy-terminal; thus, in order to demonstrate it, the amino-acid stretch 248–316 was fused to the carboxy-terminus of the SFNV NSs, sharing a homology of 54% with TOSV NSs, and lacking this sequence (S4 Fig). SFNV NSs did not show any degrading activity to RIG-I; on the contrary, the obtained chimeric protein acquired the features of TOSV NSs, becoming capable to degrade RIG-I. Then, we demonstrated that neither NSsΔC nor NSsΔN were able to ubiquitinate RIG-I in vitro. Thus, it appeared that both the amino-acid ends of TOSV NSs could be involved in an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Indeed, NSs, but not NSsΔC or NSsΔN, could transfer ubiquitin to the RIG-I substrate, as shown in the in vitro reaction in which ubiquitination process only occurred in the presence of E1, E2 and wt-NSs in place of the E3 Ub ligase. The results were also confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis, which revealed the presence of ubiquitin at positions 115 and 172 of rRIG-I CARDS after the in vitro reaction, in the presence of NSs. Moreover, this reaction was specific for RIG-I CARDs, since NSs did not show this activity with a different target, such as the onco-suppressor protein p53. Therefore, it was interesting to understand which type of E3 ubiquitin ligase could be ascribed to TOSV NSs. While some RING or HECT E3 ligases appear to interact directly with the substrate and E2 [25, 26, 29, 31, 64], others require additional components and interact with the substrate only indirectly, as part of a multi-subunit CRL complex [26–35]. Both RING and HECT E3 ligases transfer ubiquitin to a lysine residue on the substrate, RING E3s act as a platform to allow a direct transfer of ubiquitin from the E2 to the substrate [64]. On the other hand, HECT E3s accept ubiquitin from E2 to form a ubiquitin-thioester intermediate with an active cysteine, then transfer ubiquitin to both the ε-amino groups of lysine side chains of the substrate [25, 31]. Thus, cysteine may play a significant role, particularly in the ubiquitin modification for signaling. In our study, the finding of a ubiquitinated cysteine, a non-canonical site [47, 48], at position 27 of TOSV NSs, led us to suppose that this residue could also be involved in the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, in addition to the C-terminal sequence of the same protein. Indeed, even the C27G mutant of NSs was no more able to degrade RIG-I and could induce an IFN promoter in transfected cells, although at a lower level, in comparison to the NSsΔN. Therefore, we hypothesized that NSs could behave as an atypical RBR that has elements of both HECT and RING ligases: one RING domain binds the charged E2, while the other domain accepts the ubiquitin molecule before transferring it onto the substrate [32]. We hypothesized that ubiquitin-conjugated E2, bound to the carboxyl-terminus of NSs, transferred the ubiquitin to Cys27 (thioester intermediate), in the amino-terminal, as demonstrated by mass spectrometry, and, from there, to RIG-I, linked to NSs (Fig 4). This model might explain why NSs was losing its antagonistic activity to IFN, when one of the two amino-acid ends was lost. At present, we do not know why cSFNV NSs showed a ubiquitin E3 ligase activity, despite not having a cysteine at position 27, but it is possible that cysteine at position 39 of SNFV NSs was processed in the same way. Further investigations are ongoing in order to better determine the dynamics of the steps in this ubiquitination process; however, this is the first study showing a viral protein with an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity among negative strand RNA viruses. Although viruses have acquired tactics to minimize host antiviral responses by co-evolving with their hosts, RING E3s, encoded or hijacked by viruses for evading immune responses, are largely undiscovered and can clarify how viruses play this game with their host.
Materials and methods
Cells and viruses
Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) and human embryonic kidney Lenti-X 293T cells (Clontech, Milan, Italy) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Lonza, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone Europe, Milan, Italy) and 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (FCS) (Lonza), respectively, at 37 °C. Toscana virus (TOSV) strain 1812 [18] was used for all the experiments described.
Reagents and antibodies
Transient transfections were performed with GeneJuice Transfection reagent (Novagen, Milan, Italy), according to the manufacturer’s instruction, or standard calcium phosphate method [65]. Chemicals were all purchased from AppliChem GmbH (Germany). The proteasome inhibitor MG-132 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Mouse anti-6xHis tag antibody (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy), anti-RIG-I (DDX58) polyclonal antibody (OriGene, Rockville, MD, USA), mouse anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy), mouse monoclonal anti-HA tag antibody, fluorescein (FITC)-labeled anti-mouse IgG and anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-rabbit IgG HRP-conjugated was supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Heidelberg,Germany) Ni-NTA sepharose was purchased from Novagen (Milan, Italy) and anti-Ub FK2 clone from Enzo Life Sciences (New York, USA).
RIG-I expression in TOSV infected cells
Lenti-X 293T cells were grown in a 24-wells plate (5x105/ml). After 24h, cell monolayers were infected with TOSV 1812, by using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. After 1h adsorption at 37 °C, viral inoculum was removed and replaced by complete growth medium. Cells were collected at 24h and 48h post-infection (p.i.). Where indicated, infected cells were transfected with 1 μg of NSs expression plasmid or empty plasmid, 5h after infection. Positive control was obtained by stimulating cell with poly(I:C) for 18h. Cell lysates were collected in RIPA buffer; 50 μg of total proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) membrane (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany). After blocking with 5% non-fat dry milk, filters were incubated O/N at room temperature with anti-RIG-I (1:5000 dilution), anti-NSs (1:200 dilution) or anti-N (1:200 dilution) mouse sera. After being washed with PBS 0.2% Tween-20 (PBS-T), membranes were incubated with anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000 dilution) and proteins were detected with TMB Enhanced One Component HRP Membrane Substrate (Tebu-bio, Milan, Italy).
Plasmids
Toscana virus full-length, NSsΔC (nt: 1–861) expressing plasmids were cloned in pcDNA4HisMax (Life Technologies, Milan, Italy) as described elsewhere [22]. Similarly, NSsΔN (nt: 217–537) expressing plasmid was generated by PCR with NSsΔN BamHI sense (nt 217–231) 5’-CGCGGATCCCCATGGCTGTACTGGGGCCT-3’ and NSs EcoRI antisense (nt 948–931) 5’-CCGGAATTCTAAGGGTGGGTAGTGGGG -3’ primers (Sigma-Aldrich). The gene was cloned in pcDNA4HisMax-A plasmid (Invitrogen) at the BamHI-EcoRI unique sites of the polylinker in frame with the 6xHis tag. The Cysteine27 mutant was obtained by using QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy), according to the manufacture’s instruction. Sandfly Fever Naples Virus (SFNV), strain Sabin (GenBank Accession N° EF201829) chimeric NSs gene carrying the TOSV C-terminal domain (cSFNV) was generated by PCR using, as reverse primer, a synthetic DNA fragment (gBlock: Integrated DNA Technologies) consisting of the C-terminus of TOSV NSs gene (nt: 739–951) partially overlapping to the 3’-end of SFNV NSs ORF, and a SFNV-NSs sense primer (primers sequences available upon request). The chimeric gene was cloned in the pcDNA4HisMax plasmid (Life Technologies) by standard procedure. Full-length Toscana virus NSs gene was also cloned in the bacterial expression plasmid pET15b (Novagen), while ORFs coding for all the NSs mutants and RIG-I RIG-I CARDs were cloned in pRSET plasmid (Life Technologies). All the recombinant plasmids were confirmed by sequencing. The reporter plasmid encoding Firefly Luciferase downstream the complete interferon-beta promoter (p125-Luc) was kindly provided by Takashi Fujita (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan) [66], while the Renilla Luciferase reporter plasmid (pSV40-RL) was purchased from Promega (Promega, Milan, Italy). Plasmids for FLAG-tagged human RIG-I, RIG-I N-terminal RIG-I CARDs domain (RIG-IN), HA- human p53 and the HA-tagged human ubiquitin were kindly provided by A. García-Sastre (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York), T. Fujita (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan), M. Tommasino (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France) and D. Arnoult (Inserm, France), respectively.
Recombinant proteins expression and purification
Recombinant proteins production was achieved by induction of transformed BL21(DE3)-pLys (Novagen) cells with 1 mM IPTG for 3h at 37 °C. TOSV NSs was recovered from inclusion bodies via solubilisation with 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]; 300 mM NaCl; 0.3% w/v N-laurylsarcosine (SRK) and 6xHis tagged fusion proteins were purified by using Ni-NTA sepharose following manufacturer’s instruction. 6xHis-RIG-I CARDs were purified from IPTG induced BL21(DE3)-pLys (Novagen) bacterial culture as described above, with SRK omission. Purified protein fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE and pure protein containing fractions were pooled, diluted ten-folds with 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0] and dialysed against the same buffer O/N at room temperature. Recovered proteins were concentrated by using ultrafiltration devices, quantified by BCA reagent (Pierce, Milan, Italy) and stored at -80 °C in aliquots. TOSV recombinant nucleoprotein N was produced and purified as described elsewhere [67]. Recombinant human full-length RIG-I was purchased by BPS Bioscience Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).
Immunofluorescence
Lenti-X 293T cells, seeded in 24-wells culture plate, were transfected with 0.5 μg of wt-, deleted- or mutated-NSs expressing plasmids, alone or in combination with 0.05 μg of FLAG-RIG-I or HA-p53 expressing plasmids. Cells were collected and stained with anti-6xHis antibody (1:2000 dilution), anti-HA antibody (1:500 dilution) or with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (1:500 dilution). FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG (1:320 dilution) was used as secondary antibody. Immunofluorescence was visualized by a Diaplan microscope (Leica Microsystems, Milan, Italy). RIG-I and NSs positive cells were counted in three different fields of the same slide. The mean value of positive cells was calculated with respect to the total number of spotted cells (3.5x105/well).
Luciferase reporter gene assay
2x105 Lenti-X 293T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected with indicated plasmids as previously described. Briefly, 0.2 μg of p125-FFLuc, 0.05 μg of RIG-I and, where indicated, 0.5 μg of wt-NSs or NSs mutants expressing plasmids were co-transfected. Empty plasmid was used to normalize total DNA amount. Twenty ng of pSV40-RL were co-transfected as internal control. Thirty-six hours post-transfection, cells were stimulated with 2 μg/ml of poly(I:C). After additional 12h, cells were collected and luciferase activities were measured on lysates by using dual Luciferase reporter assay reagent (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell lysates were stored at -20 °C for further analysis by immunoblotting. Results are given as mean values of several experiments ± standard deviations (SD).
Immunoblot analysis
Fifty μg of total cell lysates of co-transfected cells were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblotting was performed as described above, by using anti-HA (1:1000 dilution), anti-FLAG (1:2000 dilution) or anti-6xHis (1:1000 dilution). Quantitative comparison among samples was performed by densitometric analysis using the ImageJ software as reported in Supplement data.
In vitro ubiquitination assay
To evaluate TOSV NSs E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, purified recombinant wt-NSs or its mutants were used in the in vitro protein Ubiquitination assay (Enzo Life Science). Experimental reactions and controls were added as suggested by the manufacturer. Briefly, 100 nM ubiquitin activating enzyme (E1); 2.5 μM of ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2) UbcH5b/c; 1 μM of rNSs protein or its mutants as source of E3 ligase, 2.5 μM of biotinylated ubiquitin and 1 μM of recombinant purified RIG-I, RIG-I CARDs or p53 were incubated at 37 °C for 4-6h. Negative control reactions lacking rNSs or containing 1 μM of TOSV rN in place of E3 ubiquitin ligase were included in the experiment set. Reactions were quenched by adding 5X gel loading buffer and analysed by western blotting for ubiquitinated RIG-I CARDs by anti-DDX58 polyclonal antibody (1:500 dilution) or anti-Ub FK2 clone (1:1000 dilution).
Mass spectrometry detection of ubiquitinated protein residues
Lenti-X 293T seeded in T25 flasks were transfected with 3 μg of wt-NSs plasmid in combination with 1 μg of plasmid encoding for HA-tagged ubiquitin. At 36h post-transfection, cells were treated with MG-132 to a final concentration of 1 μM for additional 12h and collected at 48 h post-transfection. Pull-down for NSs was achieved by Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) under denaturing conditions. Briefly, cell pellets were lysed in 5 M guanidine-HCl; 10 mM HEPES [pH 8.0] with sonication. His-tagged NSs was bound to Ni-NTA sepharose for 3h at room-temperature. Beads were collected and extensively washed with 10 mM HEPES [pH 8.0], 1 M NaCl, 0.3% w/v SRK, 50 mM imidazole. Bound proteins were eluted with Laemmli denaturing sample buffer, loaded on SDS-PAGE and stained with Bio-safe Coomassie stain (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Protein bands were cut from gel and prepared for mass-spectrometry analysis as carried out by Cogentech Proteomics/MS (Cogentech S.c.a.r.l., Milan, Italy), by using the nLC-ESI-MS/MS QExactive-HF system. Similarly, the rRIG-I CARDs ubiquitination was confirmed by mass-spectrometry performed on the in vitro ubiquitination reaction products.
Statistical analysis
The mean differences were statistically analyzed using Stat View statistical software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Immunofluorescence and luciferase reporter gene assay results were expressed as the mean ± SD of determinations made in three different experiments. Probability (p) values were calculated by t-test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [tif]
Toscana virus infection leads to RIG-I production.
S2 Fig [tif]
TOSV NSs amino-acid sequence.
S3 Fig [rn]
Toscana virus NSs protein retains E3 ubiquitin ligase activity on RIG-I.
S4 Fig [tif]
Sequence alignment of TOSV and SFNV NSs proteins.
S5 Fig [tif]
Tracking of RIG-I CARDs ubiquitination by mass spectrometry.
S6 Fig [cys27]
Mass spectrum of Toscana virus NSs protein.
S7 Fig [tif]
CG-NSs mutant is unable to mediate RIG-I rCARDs ubiquitination.
S1 Dataset [sd]
Evaluation of TOSV effects on endogenous RIG-I expression.
S2 Dataset [sd]
Ubiquitination activity of wt NSs and NSs deleted variants.
S3 Dataset [sd]
C-terminal domain of TOSV NSs is associated to its ubiquitination function.
S4 Dataset [sd]
C residue at the TOSV NSs N-terminal domain is critical for its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity.
Zdroje
1. Braito A, Ciufolini MG, Pippi L, Corbisiero R, Fiorentini C, Gistri A, et al. Phlebotomus-transmitted Toscana virus infections of the central nervous system: a seven-year experience in Tuscany. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30: 505–508. doi: 10.1080/00365549850161539 10066054
2. Verani P, Ciufolini MG, Nicoletti L, Calducci M, Sabatinelli G, Coluzzi M, Paci P, et al. Ecological and epidemiological studies of Toscana virus, an arbovirus isolated from Phlebotomus. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 1982;18: 397–399. 7187828
3. Kuhn J, Bewermeyer H, Hartmann-Klosterkoetter U, Emmerich P, Schilling S, Valassina M. Toscana virus causing severe meningoencephalitis in an elderly traveler. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychatry. 2005;76: 1605–1606.
4. Bartels S, Heckmann JG. Lethal encephalitis caused by Toscana virus in an elderly patient. J Neurol. 2012;259: 175–177. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6121-y 21656341
5. Sanbonmatsu-Gámez S, Pérez-Ruiz M, Palop-Borrás B, Navarro-Marí JM. Unusual manifestation of Toscana virus infection, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15: 347–348 doi: 10.3201/eid1502.081001 19193294
6. Bouloy M. Bunyaviridae: genome organization and replication strategies. Adv Virus Res. 1991;40: 235–75 doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60281-x 1957720
7. Di Bonito P, Mochi S, Grò MC, Fortini D, Giorgi C. Organization of the M genomic segment of Toscana phlebovirus. J Gen Virol. 1997;76: 77–81.
8. Accardi L, Gro MC, Di Bonito P, Giorgi C. Toscana virus genomic L segment: molecular cloning, coding strategy and amino acid sequence in comparison with other negative strand RNA viruses. Virus Res. 1993;27: 119–131. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(93)90076-y 8460526
9. Grò MC, Di Bonito P, Fortini D, Mochi S, Giorgi C. Completion of molecular characterization of Toscana phlebovirus genome: nucleotide sequence, coding strategy of M genomic segment and its amino acid sequence comparison to other phleboviruses. Virus Res. 1997;51: 81–91. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(97)00076-2 9381797
10. Reikine S, Nguyen JB, Modis Y. Pattern Recognition and Signaling Mechanisms of RIG-I and MDA5. Front Immunol. 2014;5: 342. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00342 25101084
11. Weber F, Bridgen A, Fazakerley JK, Streitenfeld H, Kessler N, Randall RE, et al. Bunyamwera bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs counteracts the induction of alpha/beta interferon. J Virol. 2002;76: 7949–7955. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.16.7949-7955.2002 12133999
12. Jääskeläinen KM, Kaukinen P, Minskaya ES, Plyusnina A, Vapalahti O, Elliott RM, et al. Tula and Puumala hantavirus NSs ORFs are functional and the products inhibit activation of the interferon-beta promoter. J Med Virol. 2007;79: 1527–1536. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20948 17705180
13. Bridgen AM, Weber F, Fazakerley JK, Elliott RM. Bunyamvera bunyavirus non-structural protein NSs is nonessential gene product that contributes to the viral pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98: 664–669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.664 11209062
14. Blakqori G, Delhaye S, Habjan M, Blair CD, Sánchez-Vargas I, Olson KE, et al. La Crosse bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs serves to suppress the type I interferon system of mammalian hosts. J Virol. 2007;81: 4991–4999. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01933-06 17344298
15. Léonard VH, Kohl A, Hart TJ, Elliott RM. Interaction of Bunyamwera Orthobunyavirus NSs protein with mediator protein MED8: a mechanism for inhibiting the interferon response. J Virol. 2006;80: 9667–9675. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00822-06 16973571
16. Wuerth JD, Weber F. Phleboviruses and the Type I Interferon Response. Viruses. 2016;8:pii: E174.
17. Brisbarre NM, Plumet S, de Micco P, Leparc-Goffart I, Emonet SF. Toscana virus inhibits the interferon beta response in cell cultures. Virology. 2013;442: 189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.016 23684418
18. Gori Savellini G, Weber F, Terrosi C, Habjan M, Martorelli B, Cusi MG. Toscana virus induces interferon although its NSs protein reveals antagonistic activity. J Gen Virol. 2011;92: 71–79. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.025999-0 20861320
19. Chen X, Ye H, Li S, Jiao B, Wu J, Zeng P, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus inhibits exogenous Type I IFN signaling pathway through its NSs in vitro. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0172744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172744 28234991
20. Zhang S, Zheng B, Wang T, Li A, Wan J, Qu J, et al. NSs protein of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus suppresses interferon production through different mechanism than Rift Valley fever virus. Acta Virol. 2017;61: 289–298. doi: 10.4149/av_2017_307 28854793
21. Gori Savellini G, Valentini M, Cusi MG. Toscana virus NSs protein inhibits the induction of type I interferon by interacting with RIG-I. J Virol. 2013;87: 6660–6667. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03129-12 23552410
22. Gori Savellini G, Gandolfo C, Cusi MG. Truncation of the C-terminal region of Toscana Virus NSs protein is critical for interferon-β antagonism and protein stability. Virology. 2015;486: 255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.09.021 26474372
23. Pickart CM. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70: 503–533. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503 11395416
24. Scheffner M, Nuber U, Huibregtse JM. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature. 1995;373: 81–83. doi: 10.1038/373081a0 7800044
25. Ardley HC, Robinson PA. E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem. 2005;41: 15–30. 16250895
26. Bernassola F, Karin M, Ciechanover A, Melino G. The HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: multiple players in cancer development. Cancer Cell. 2008;14: 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.06.001 18598940
27. Bosu DR, Kipreos ET. Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases: global regulation and activation cycles. Cell Div. 2008;3: 7. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-3-7 18282298
28. Zheng N, Shabek N. Ubiquitin Ligases: Structure, Function, and Regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2017;86: 129–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014922 28375744
29. Jackson PK, Eldridge AG, Freed E, Furstenthal L, Hsu JY, Kaiser BK, et al. The lore of the RINGs: substrate recognition and catalysis by ubiquitin ligases. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10: 429–439. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01834-1 10998601
30. Weber J, Polo S, Maspero E. HECT E3 Ligases: A Tale With Multiple Facets. Front Physiol. 2019;10: 370. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00370 31001145
31. Rotin D, Kumar S. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10: 398–409. doi: 10.1038/nrm2690 19436320
32. Spratt DE, Walden H, Shaw GS. RBR E3 ubiquitin ligases: new structures, new insights, new questions. Biochem J. 2014;458: 421–437. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140006 24576094
33. Sluimer J, Distel B. Regulating the human HECT E3 ligases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75: 3121–3141. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2848-2 29858610
34. Metzger MB, Pruneda JN, Klevit RE, Weissman AM. RING-type E3 ligases: master manipulators of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitination. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1843: 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.026 23747565
35. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78: 399–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809 19489725
36. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78: 477–513. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607 19489727
37. Thrower JS, Hoffman L, Rechsteiner M, Pickart CM. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 2000;19: 94–102. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.1.94 10619848
38. Akutsu M, Dikic I, Bremm A. Ubiquitin chain diversity at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129: 875–880. doi: 10.1242/jcs.183954 26906419
39. Komander D. The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37: 937–953. doi: 10.1042/BST0370937 19754430
40. Chen ZJ, Sun LJ. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell. 2009;33: 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.014 19217402
41. Kawadler H, Yang X. Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains: linking more than just ubiquitin. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5: 1273–1274. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.10.3289 16969079
42. Park SW, Han MG, Park C, Ju YR, Ahn BY, Ryou J. Hantaan virus nucleocapsid protein stimulates MDM2-dependent p53 degradation. J Gen Virol. 2013;94: 2424–2428. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.054312-0 23994832
43. Kainulainen M, Habjan M, Hubel P, Busch L, Lau S, Colinge J, et al. Virulence factor NSs of rift valley fever virus recruits the F-box protein FBXO3 to degrade subunit p62 of general transcription factor TFIIH. J Virol. 2014;88: 3464–3473. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02914-13 24403578
44. Kainulainen M, Lau S, Samuel CE, Hornung V, Weber F. NSs Virulence Factor of Rift Valley Fever Virus Engages the F-Box Proteins FBXW11 and β-TRCP1 To Degrade the Antiviral Protein Kinase PKR. J Virol. 2016;90: 6140–6147. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00016-16 27122577
45. van Knippenberg I, Carlton-Smith C, Elliott RM. The N-terminus of Bunyamwera orthobunyavirus NSs protein is essential for interferon antagonism. J Gen Virol. 2010;91: 2002–2006. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.021774-0 20427562
46. Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10: 845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 25950237
47. Vosper JM, McDowel GS, Hindley CJ, Fiore-Heriche CS, Kucerova R, Horan I, Philpott A. Ubiquitylation on canonical and non-canonical sites targets the transcription factor neurogenin for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284: 15458–15468 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809366200 19336407
48. Kravtsova-Ivantsiv Y, Ciechanover A. Non-canonical ubiquitin-based signals for proteasomal degradation. J Cell Sci. 2012;125: 539–548 doi: 10.1242/jcs.093567 22389393
49. Viswanathan K, Früh K, DeFilippis V. Viral hijacking of the host ubiquitin system to evade interferon responses. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13: 517–523. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.012 20699190
50. Rahman MM, McFadden G. Modulation of NF-κB signalling by microbial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9: 291–306. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2539 21383764
51. Lindner HA. Deubiquitination in virus infection. Virology. 2007;362: 245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.035 17291557
52. Maelfait J, Beyaert R. Emerging role of ubiquitination in antiviral RIG-I signaling. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76: 33–45. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05012-11 22390971
53. Heaton SM, Borg NA, Dixit VM. Ubiquitin in the activation and attenuation of innate antiviral immunity. J Exp Med. 2016;213: 1–13. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151531 26712804
54. Zhu H, Zheng C, Xing J, Wang S, Li S, Lin R, et al. Varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein ORF61 abrogates the IRF3-mediated innate immune response through degradation of activated IRF3. J Virol. 2011;85: 11079–11089. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05098-11 21835786
55. Lanfranca MP, Mostafa HH, Davido DJ. HSV-1 ICP0: An E3 Ubiquitin Ligase That Counteracts Host Intrinsic and Innate Immunity. Cells. 2014;3: 438–454. doi: 10.3390/cells3020438 24852129
56. Zhang L, Villa NY, McFadden G. Interplay between poxviruses and the cellular ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like pathways. FEBS Lett. 2009;583: 607–614. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.01.023 19174161
57. Oshiumi H, Miyashita M, Matsumoto M, Seya T. A distinct role of Riplet-mediated K63-Linked polyubiquitination of the RIG-I repressor domain in human antiviral innate immune responses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9: e1003533. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003533 23950712
58. Mudhasani R, Tran JP, Retterer C, Kota KP, Whitehouse CA, Bavari S. Protein Kinase R Degradation Is Essential for Rift Valley Fever Virus Infection and Is Regulated by SKP1-CUL1-F-box (SCF)FBXW11-NSs E3 Ligase. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12: e1005437. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005437 26837067
59. Koliopoulos MG, Lethier M, van der Veen AG, et al. Molecular mechanism of influenza A NS1-mediated TRIM25 recognition and inhibition. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1820. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04214-8 29739942
60. Rajsbaum R, Albrecht RA, Wang MK, Maharaj NP, Versteeg GA, Nistal-Villán E, et al. Species-specific inhibition of RIG-I ubiquitination and IFN induction by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8: e1003059. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003059 23209422
61. Gack MU, Albrecht RA, Urano T, Inn KS, Huang IC, Carnero E, et al. Influenza A virus NS1 targets the ubiquitin ligase TRIM25 to evade recognition by the host viral RNA sensor RIG-I. Cell Host Microbe. 2006;5: 439–449.
62. Sánchez-Aparicio MT, Feinman LJ, García-Sastre A, Shaw ML. Paramyxovirus V Proteins Interact with the RIG-I/TRIM25 Regulatory Complex and Inhibit RIG-I Signaling. J Virol. 2018;92: e01960–17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01960-17 29321315
63. Ding S, Mooney N, Li B, et al. Comparative Proteomics Reveals Strain-Specific β-TrCP Degradation via Rotavirus NSP1 Hijacking a Host Cullin-3-Rbx1 Complex. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12: e1005929. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005929 27706223
64. Riley BE, Lougheed JC, Callaway K, Velasquez M, Brecht E, Nguyen L, et al. Structure and function of Parkin E3 ubiquitin ligase reveals aspects of RING and HECT ligases. Nat Commun. 2013;4: 1982. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2982 23770887
65. Kingstone RE, Chen CA, Rose JK. Calcium phosphate transfection. In: Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston R, Moore D, Seidman J, Smith J, Struhl K, editors. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. New York: 63; 2003. 1–9.
66. Yoneyama M, Suhara W, Fukuhara Y, Sato M, Ozato K, Fujita T. Autocrine amplification of type I interferon gene expression mediated by interferon stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3). J Biochem. 1996;120: 160–169. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021379 8864859
67. Valassina M, Soldateschi D, dal Maso GM, Santini L, Bianchi S, Valensin PE, Cusi MG. Diagnostic Potential of Toscana Virus N Protein Expressed in Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37: 1237.
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2019 Číslo 12
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Coxiella burnetii Type 4B Secretion System-dependent manipulation of endolysosomal maturation is required for bacterial growth
- IL-22 produced by type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) reduces the mortality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- The pandemic Escherichia coli sequence type 131 strain is acquired even in the absence of antibiotic exposure
- A role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha in Mouse Gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) lytic replication and reactivation from latency