Aminoterminal Amphipathic α-Helix AH1 of Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural Protein 4B Possesses a Dual Role in RNA Replication and Virus Production
With an estimated 180 million chronically infected individuals, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. HCV is a positive-strand RNA virus that builds its replication complex on rearranged intracellular membranes, designated as membranous web. HCV nonstructural protein 4B (NS4B) is a key organizer of HCV membranous web and replication complex formation. Here, we provide a detailed structure-function analysis of an N-terminal amphipathic α-helix of NS4B, named AH1, and demonstrate that it plays key roles in shaping the membranous web as well as in virus production. We also show that the N-terminal part of NS4B adopts a dual membrane topology in a replicative context, possibly reflecting the different roles of this protein in the viral life cycle.
Published in the journal:
. PLoS Pathog 10(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004501
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004501
Summary
With an estimated 180 million chronically infected individuals, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. HCV is a positive-strand RNA virus that builds its replication complex on rearranged intracellular membranes, designated as membranous web. HCV nonstructural protein 4B (NS4B) is a key organizer of HCV membranous web and replication complex formation. Here, we provide a detailed structure-function analysis of an N-terminal amphipathic α-helix of NS4B, named AH1, and demonstrate that it plays key roles in shaping the membranous web as well as in virus production. We also show that the N-terminal part of NS4B adopts a dual membrane topology in a replicative context, possibly reflecting the different roles of this protein in the viral life cycle.
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, with a peak of the disease burden expected in around 10 years from now [1]. HCV and GB virus B have been classified in the Hepacivirus genus within the Flaviviridae family, which also includes the genera Flavivirus, Pestivirus and Pegivirus [2]. Additional closely related viruses have been identified recently in horses as well as other animal species, and have been classified in the Hepacivirus and Pegivirus genera, including nonprimate hepaciviruses (NPHV) [3], [4].
HCV contains a 9.6-kb positive-strand RNA genome encoding a polyprotein precursor that is co- and posttranslationally processed into ten structural and nonstructural proteins [2], [5]. As all positive-strand RNA viruses, HCV replicates its genome in a membrane-associated replication complex composed of viral proteins, replicating RNA, rearranged intracellular membranes and additional host factors [6], [7], [8], [9]. The specific membrane alteration induced during HCV RNA replication has been designated as membranous web [10], [11]. Nonstructural proteins 3 through 5B are essential for HCV RNA replication, and their functional complex is referred to as replicase.
Nonstructural protein 4B (NS4B) is the least characterized HCV protein. However, evidence from biochemical, structural and genetic studies as well as electron microscopy (EM) indicates that NS4B is a key organizer of HCV replication complex formation (reviewed in [12]). Indeed, NS4B has been shown to induce formation of the membranous web which serves as a scaffold for the viral replicase [10], [11]. More recent work has shown that the other nonstructural proteins, especially NS5A, contribute to the formation of double membrane vesicles (DMVs) which make up the membranous web [13] and are believed to represent sites of HCV RNA replication [14].
NS4B is a 27-kDa integral membrane protein comprising an N-terminal part (amino acids [aa] 1 to ∼69), a central part harboring four predicted transmembrane segments (aa ∼70 to ∼190), and a C-terminal part (aa ∼191 to 261). The N-terminal part comprises a predicted and a structurally resolved amphipathic α-helix, designated as AH1 and AH2, respectively. AH2 comprises aa 42–66 and has been shown to play an important role in HCV RNA replication [15]. Intriguingly, it has the potential to traverse the phospholipid bilayer as a transmembrane segment, likely upon oligomerization [15], [16], [17], [18]. Hence, the N-terminal part of NS4B may adopt a dual cytosolic and ER luminal topology. However, this has not been explored in a functional, replicative context.
AH1 was predicted as an amphipathic α-helix and reported to mediate membrane association and HCV RNA replication [19]. However, membrane association of AH1 is debated [12] and the actual structure as well as detailed functional analyses, covering the complete HCV life cycle, have not been reported.
Here, we describe the three-dimensional structure of AH1 and provide a detailed structure-function analysis, indicating that this structurally highly conserved segment of NS4B possesses a dual role in HCV RNA replication and virus production. In addition, we demonstrate that the N-terminal part of NS4B adopts a dual membrane topology in an authentic replication context, allowing to speculate that the different functions of NS4B may be governed by different topologies.
Results
Sequence analyses and structure predictions
Sequence analyses and structure predictions were performed to assess the degree of conservation of the N-terminal part of NS4B and to identify potential structural determinants. The degree of aa conservation among different genotypes was investigated by ClustalW alignment of 27 reference sequences representative of the major HCV genotypes and subtypes. This alignment revealed that the segment comprising aa 50–70, including part of amphipathic α-helix AH2 (aa 42–69), is well conserved, whereas the aa 1–50 segment, including predicted amphipathic α-helix AH1, appears highly variable except for a few well-conserved positions (e.g., basic residues at positions 18 and 20 and a proline at position 38 (Fig. 1). However, the apparent variability is limited at most positions since the observed residues exhibit similar physicochemical properties, as indicated both by the similarity pattern (colons and dots) and the hydropathic pattern, where o, i, and n denote hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and neutral residues, respectively (see Legend to Figure 1 for details). Moreover, all secondary structure prediction methods indicate the presence of an α-helix in the segment comprising aa 5–35 in all genotypes. Hence, despite the apparent aa variability, conservation of the hydropathic pattern suggests that the overall structure of AH1 is conserved.
While AH2 was predicted and subsequently shown to associate with membranes, the N-terminal aa 1–40 segment does not show propensity to partition into a phospholipid bilayer [15]. This is in agreement with an analysis by Palomares-Jerez et al. [20] but in contrast to an earlier report by Elazar et al. [19] (see Discussion section).
Structure of NS4B AH1
To gain insight into the structure and potential lipotropic properties of the NS4B aa 1–40 segment, the corresponding peptide derived from the HCV JFH1 strain (genotype 2a), designated as NS4B[1–40], was chemically synthesized, purified, and analyzed by circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
The secondary structure of NS4B[1–40] was examined by CD spectroscopy in various membrane mimetic media, including the lysolipid L-α-lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), detergents (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside [DDM], dodecylphosphocholine [DPC]), or co-solvents (2,2,2-trifluoroethanol [TFE]-water mixture) (Fig. 2A). In all cases, the CD spectra displayed the typical shape of an α-helix with two minima at 208 and 222 nm and one maximum around 192 nm. CD deconvolution indicated a similar α-helix content of 75±10%, although a weaker signal intensity was observed in the presence of DDM. These results indicate the high propensity of NS4B[1–40] to adopt an α-helical structure in a hydrophobic environment. Interestingly, the peptide solubilized in water displayed a complex spectrum with a weak maximum around 188 nm and two broad minima around 202 and 222 nm, indicating the presence of a mixture of α-helical and random structures. Accordingly, an α-helix content of approximately 22% together with 55% disordered structure was estimated with the various CD deconvolution methods used. Such a secondary structure content for a short peptide suggests that it possibly exists as soluble, micelle-like aggregates which stabilize some residual α-helical folding in aqueous solution through the formation of a hydrophobic core by the hydrophobic sides of several peptide monomers.
As samples of NS4B[1–40] prepared in deuterated micellar SDS and DPC displayed poorly resolved NMR spectra, the three-dimensional structure of the peptide was determined in 50% TFE-d2 which exhibits a CD spectrum comparable to those observed in LPC, SDS and DPC (Fig. 2A) and yielded well-resolved NMR spectra. Sequential assignment of all spin systems was completed and an overview of the sequential and medium-range nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) connectivities is shown in Figure 2B. The NOE connectivity patterns demonstrated that the central part of the peptide, including residues 4–32, displays most characteristics of an α-helix, including strong dNN(i,i+1) and medium dαN(i,i+1) sequential connectivities as well as weak dαN(i,i+2), medium or strong dαN(i,i+3) and dαβ(i,i+3), as well as weak dαN(i,i+4) medium-range connectivities. Apart from this central α-helix, some rare connectivities of weaker intensity are present in both termini of the peptide as a sign of highly flexible unstructured ends. The NOE-based indications of an α-helical fold were supported by the deviation of the 1Hα and 13Cα chemical shifts from random coil values [21] (Fig. 2C). A series of continuous negative variations of 1Hα chemical shifts (Δδ1Hα <−0.1 ppm) and positive variations of 13Cα chemical shifts (Δδ13Cα>0.07 ppm) observed for residues 3 to 32 are indeed typical of an α-helical conformation. Based on the NOE-derived inter-proton distance and dihedral angle constraints deduced from chemical shifts, a set of 50 structures was calculated with X-PLOR, and a final set of 37 low-energy structures that fully satisfied the experimental NMR data were retained. The number and types of NOE constraints used for the structure calculations as well as the statistics for this final set of 37 structures are provided in Table S1. All structures show a regular α-helical conformation extending from residues 4 to 32. A superimposition of the calculated structures is shown in Figure S1. As illustrated in Figure 2D for the representative structure of NS4B[1–40], the central part of the α-helix, including residues Ile 13 to Leu 25, clearly exhibits an amphipathic character, with all hydrophobic residues exposed on one side and charged as well as polar residues on the opposite side. Interestingly, the α-helical folding of this central segment appears to be particularly stable, as indicated by the very slow amide proton exchange observed by NMR in this region (Fig. 2B, blue squares). Hence, this segment likely constitutes an important structural scaffold. In addition, the bulky hydrophobic residues Leu 6 and Ile 7 are also located on the hydrophobic side of the α-helix, suggesting that aa segment 6–25 may bind to a membrane hydrophobic core. These features suggest that AH1 may interact with the membrane interface in an in-plane topology, at least transiently. The C-terminal end (aa residues 26–32) of the α-helix does not include any hydrophobic residue but comprises an intriguingly large number of glutamine residues, which are, however, not conserved in all HCV genotypes (Fig. 1). Because of its purely hydrophilic nature, the folding of this C-terminal part most likely depends on interactions with other parts of NS4B and/or other interaction partners.
NS4B AH1 from different hepaciviruses share conserved structural features
To investigate the structural conservation of AH1, we compared two distantly related hepacivirus species, HCV and NPHV. As shown in the upper part of Figure 3, there is only a low degree of aa conservation between the NS4B aa 1–40 segments from the HCV JFH1 strain and NPHV-B10-022 [3]. However, the latter was strongly predicted to adopt an α-helical fold by secondary structure analyses performed as described in the Legend to Figure 1. Based on these observations, α-helix projections generated by Heliquest [22] were compared, as shown in the lower part of Figure 3. Interestingly, despite divergent primary aa sequences, α-helix projections showed a conservation of the amphipathic character of AH1 and of a number of structurally conserved features, including the presence of two positively charged residues, i.e. arginine or lysine, flanking the helices at the borders between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic sides as well as the presence of two negatively charged glutamate residues aligned on the hydrophilic side of AH1 from HCV and NPHV (Fig. 3). Taken together, these observations highlight structurally conserved features of AH1 from phylogenetically distant hepaciviruses, suggesting similar functions of this segment of NS4B within the Hepacivirus genus.
The positively charged residues flanking AH1 are crucial for HCV RNA replication
The role of the structurally conserved features of AH1 in HCV RNA replication was investigated by the use of a subgenomic JFH1 replicon harboring a luciferase reporter gene. As shown in Figure 4A, alanine substitution of Lys 18 and Lys 20, either simultaneously (K18A/K20A) or individually (K18A and K20A), abrogated HCV RNA replication, as inferred by comparison with the non-replicative ΔGDD polymerase mutant. In addition, insertion of one alanine residue between Lys 18 and Ser 19 (KASK), resulting in a 110° twist of the α-helix and thus an altered positioning of the two lysine residues in positions 18 and 20, abrogated HCV RNA replication. Hence, the positively charged residues flanking AH1 on either side are required for HCV RNA replication. By contrast, alanine substitution of the two conserved glutamate residues highlighted above (E8A/E15A) did only slightly affect RNA replication at an early time point (about 5-fold reduction in relative light units [RLU] at 24 h, but no appreciable difference at 48 and 72 h).
To explore the mechanism by which substitution of the positively charged aa residues affects HCV RNA replication, the subcellular localization of NS4B harboring the different mutations was investigated in Huh-7 cells using a T7 RNA polymerase-based NS3-5B polyprotein expression system [23]. As shown in Figure 4B, all mutants displayed a similar cytoplasmic, reticular and dot-like distribution pattern, as described previously for NS4B and corresponding to the typical localization on membranes of the ER and of ER-derived modified membranes making up the membranous web [11], [15]. In addition, all mutants colocalized with NS5A to the same extent as the wild-type. These observations indicate that the replication defect of mutants K18A/K20A, K18A and K20A cannot be explained by an aberrant subcellular localization of NS4B or an obvious decrease in NS4B-NS5A colocalization.
NS4B AH1 contributes to proper DMV formation
To gain deeper insight into the consequences of removal of the positively charged residues flanking AH1, we investigated the ultrastructure of membrane rearrangements induced by the different NS4B mutants by EM. To this end, the mutants were expressed in Huh-7 cells using a T7 RNA polymerase-based NS3-5B polyprotein expression system, as above. Previous work had shown that DMVs are formed in this system and that these closely resemble the HCV-induced membrane rearrangements observed in the context of subgenomic RNA replication and HCV infection [13], [24]. As shown in Figure 5A, regular round-shaped DMVs were readily observed for mutants K18A/K20A, K18A and K20A but, strikingly, these exhibited a large increase in diameter as compared to the ones formed by the wild-type construct. By contrast, mutant E8A/E15A, which replicated almost as wild-type, formed DMVs that were indistinguishable from wild-type. Quantitation of the DMV diameter for each construct demonstrated that DMVs formed by mutants K18A/K20A, K18A and K20A were significantly larger than the ones formed by the wild-type as well as by mutant E8A/E15A (Fig. 5B; see Figure Legend for details). Taken together, these observations indicate that the loss of one of the conserved positively charged residues flanking AH1, i.e. Lys 18 and/or Lys 20, results in the formation of larger DMVs that do not support HCV RNA replication.
Reverse genetics confirm a requirement for HCV RNA replication of positively charged residues flanking NS4B AH1
In order to further assess the importance of the positively charged residues flanking AH1, mutations K18A, K20A and K18A/K20A were introduced into a selectable subgenomic JFH1 replicon harboring a neomycin resistance cassette in the first cistron. The corresponding in vitro transcribed RNAs were electroporated into Huh-7.5 cells, followed by selection with 500 µg/ml G418 for 3 weeks. About 70 G418-resistant colonies per µg of electroporated RNA were obtained for mutant K18A whereas mutants K18A/K20A and K20A did not yield any viable colonies. Total RNA was extracted from pooled colonies and the NS3-5B region amplified by RT-PCR, followed by cloning of amplicons and sequencing of 10 DNA subclones. Sequence analyses revealed that the K18A mutation in AH1 was retained in all clones. Amino acid changes identified elsewhere in the NS3-5B region are listed in Table 1. Strikingly, mutation P189L in domain I of NS5A was found in 9 out of 10 clones. The only clone which did not harbor this aa change in NS5A showed a substitution of Gln 26 by arginine (Q26R) in NS4B. Interestingly, this mutation results in a new positively charged residue flanking the hydrophobic side of AH1 (Fig. 3). Selection of a compensatory positively charged residue flanking AH1 was also observed in clones harboring pseudoreversions Q22R and Q27R, which coexisted with the NS5A P189L change. The relevance of these compensatory mutations was tested by reintroducing them, alone or in combination with K18A, into a JFH1 subgenomic replicon harboring a luciferase reporter gene. As shown in Figure 6A, the NS5A P189L change alone did not confer any replication advantage to the wild-type replicon and did only slightly (about 2-fold) improve replication of the NS4B K18A mutant. However, the Q22R and Q26R changes in NS4B AH1 strongly enhanced RNA replication capacity of mutant K18A (about 1.5 log for Q22R and 1.0 log for Q26R). Remarkably, the addition of NS5A change P189L to the NS4B K18A/Q22R mutant completely rescued RNA replication, thereby supporting the notion of a functional interaction between NS4B AH1 and NS5A. Finally, the NS4B Q27R change, identified in one clone harboring a number of additional aa changes (Table 1), did not rescue RNA replication of mutant K18A.
Interestingly, modeling of pseudorevertants Q22R and Q26R in the NMR structure of AH1 revealed that the lateral chains of the two selected arginine residues are oriented to the same helix side as the mutated lysine residue in position 18, opposite to Lys 20, thereby restoring a positively charged residue flanking AH1 at distances of one (Q22R) or two (Q26R) α-helix turns (Fig. 6B). By contrast, the Q27R change, which was unable to rescue the replication defect of mutant K18A when reintroduced alone, results in a positively charged residue oriented to the opposite side of Lys 18, i.e. to the same side as Lys 20, thereby failing to restore a conserved feature of AH1. Taken together, selection of pseudoreversions confirms the requirement for two positively charged residues flanking AH1 on either side, as initially suggested by their conservation throughout the different HCV genotypes as well as the Hepacivirus genus (Fig. 3).
NS4B AH1 is involved in virus production
As mutant E8A/E15A did not show any significant replication defect, we introduced these aa substitutions into a full-length Jc1 (J6/JFH1 chimeric) HCV genome and assessed virus production by 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) determination. As shown in Figure 7A, infectious virus production by this mutant was strongly reduced, with more than 100-fold lower extra- and intracellular TCID50 yields as compared to the wild-type virus. These results clearly indicate that NS4B AH1 possesses a role in HCV particle production. Quantitation of intra- vs. extracellular TCID50 suggests that the defect is primarily at the level of particle assembly, but an effect on release cannot be excluded (Fig. 7A). Quantitation of intra- vs. extracellular HCV RNA levels demonstrates that mutant E8A/E15A replicates in a full-length viral genome context and confirms the selective defect in virus production of this mutant (Fig. 7B).
The N terminus of NS4B exhibits a dual topology in a replicative context
As discussed in the Introduction section, the N terminus of NS4B has previously been proposed to adopt a dual topology, based on evidence from glycosylation acceptor site tagging experiments performed in an in vitro translation system as well as in transiently transfected mammalian cells [16], [17]. In addition, we had shown that AH2 has the potential to traverse the phospholipid bilayer and that oligomerization of AH2 is likely required for this process [15], [18]. However, the membrane topology of the N-terminal part of NS4B, comprising AH1 and AH2, has not been investigated in a functional, replicative context. Hence, we took advantage of a recently developed JFH1 subgenomic replicon harboring an HA epitope tag insertion after NS4B aa position 38, i.e. between AH1 and AH2 [14], and examined the topology of the epitope tag by selective membrane permeabilization and immunofluorescence analyses.
In a series of preliminary experiments, we found that incubation of fixed cells with 0.05% digitonin for 15 min at 4°C allowed for selective permeabilization of the plasma membrane but not the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane of Huh7-Lunet cells which are highly permissive for HCV replication [25]. By contrast, 0.2% digitonin under the same experimental conditions permeabilized both membrane compartments. As shown in Figure 8A, the cytosolically oriented core and NS5A proteins could be detected at the same fluorescence intensity under both selective and total permeabilization conditions while the ER luminally oriented E1 glycoprotein could be detected only after total membrane permeabilization. Interestingly, the HA tag inserted between NS4B AH1 and AH2 was consistently detected at an approximately 50% reduced fluorescence intensity under selective as opposed to total membrane permeabilization conditions (Fig. 8A and 8B). These results, which were independent from the choice of anti-HA antibody, indicate a dual topology of the HA tag and, thereby, of the N-terminal part of NS4B in a functional, replicative context.
To investigate whether the AH1 mutations described and characterized above affect the membrane topology of the N-terminal part of NS4B, we introduced mutations K18A/K20A and E8A/E15A into a T7 RNA polymerase-driven construct allowing the expression of NS3-5B including NS4B harboring the HA tag between AH1 and AH2. As shown in Figure 8C and Figure S2, and consistent with the results obtained in a replicative context, the fluorescence intensity for HA tag detection was reduced by about 50% under selective as compared to total membrane permeabilization conditions. Mutations K18A/K20A and E8A/E15A did not affect this ratio. By contrast, a previously described AH2 mutant which is unable to associate with membranes, oligomerize and traverse the phospholipid bilayer, designated as AH2mut [15], [18], was detected at equal fluorescence intensity under both selective and total permeabilization conditions. This additional control validates our selective permeabilization analyses, confirming that the N-terminal part of NS4B adopts a dual topology in an authentic replication context as well as in the context of heterologous NS3-5B expression and is unaffected by mutations K18A/K20A and E8A/E15A which abrogate HCV RNA replication and strongly reduce virus production, respectively.
Discussion
In the present study, we report the three-dimensional structure of NS4B AH1 and provide a detailed structure-function analysis of this N-terminal amphipathic α-helix. We show that AH1 folds as an α-helix extending from aa 4 to 32 and propose that the fold as well as a number of key structural features are conserved across hepaciviruses. Site-directed mutagenesis and reverse genetics revealed that the conserved positively charged aa residues 18 and 20 flanking AH1 on either helix side are essential for HCV RNA replication. EM analyses demonstrated that these residues play a crucial role in determining the correct size of the DMVs making up the membranous web. Furthermore, the conserved acidic residues 8 and 15 on the hydrophilic side of AH1 were found to be involved in virus production, likely at the level of assembly. Hence, NS4B AH1 possesses a dual role in HCV RNA replication and virus production. Finally, an HCV replicon harboring an epitope tag between AH1 and AH2 allowed to study the topology of the N-terminal part of NS4B in a functional context. Our findings obtained by selective membrane permeabilization and immunofluorescence analyses indicate that this part of NS4B adopts a dual membrane topology in an authentic replication context, likely determined by partial translocation of AH2 across the membrane.
Although AH1 of NS4B is globally amphipathic, NMR analyses revealed that the central amphipathic region comprising aa 13–25 is particularly stable and likely constitutes an important structural scaffold. Together with N-terminal hydrophobic residues Leu 6 and Ile 7, it might interact with the membrane interface in an in-plane topology, at least transiently. Such a binding might also allow stabilization of the α-helical fold of the hydrophilic C-terminal part comprising aa 26–32 upon interaction with the membrane. However, the highly hydrophilic character of this latter part suggests that it may adopt alternative conformations, possibly upon interaction with other parts of NS4B and/or other interaction partners. In addition, the overall hydrophilic character of AH1 is compatible with the absence of direct membrane association per se, as reported previously [15], and suggests that this α-helix may be involved in alternative intra- and/or inter-molecular interactions, e.g. with NS5A (see below).
The present work complements the structures of NS4B AH2 [15], H1 (RM and FP, unpublished) and H2 [26]. AH2 represents an amphipathic α-helix spanning aa 42 to 66 and H2 a “twisted” amphipathic α-helix extending from aa 229 to 253. Although AH1, AH2 and H2 share amphipathic character and play critical roles in HCV RNA replication, their structures are very different. AH1 is mainly hydrophilic, possesses a limited hydrophobic side lacking aromatic residues and is flanked by conserved positively charged residues, AH2 has a very hydrophobic side including 6 highly conserved aromatic residues, and H2 represents a “twisted” amphipathic α-helix. Future work will have to address the structure of the central part of NS4B believed to harbor four transmembrane segments and the ultimate goal will be to solve a complete structure of this integral membrane protein.
Our mutagenesis analyses show that AH1 contributes to RNA replication by affecting the biogenesis of DMVs making up the membranous web. While we previously did not observe a direct interaction of AH1 with cellular membranes [15], it is likely that AH1 interacts with membranes when brought into the appropriate context, e.g. in the presence of AH2 and/or upon oligomerization of NS4B. AH1 may thereby influence membrane curvature induction, resulting in proper DMV formation and assembly of a functional replication complex. Indeed, membrane-associated amphipathic α-helices flanked by positively charged residues have been described to play a role in membrane curvature sensing [27] (reviewed in [28]). As an example, Nath et al. recently demonstrated that the autophagy regulator Atg3 possess an N-terminal amphipathic α-helix which serves as membrane curvature sensor [29]. Comparably to AH1, the Atg3 amphipathic α-helix possesses two lysine residues (aa positions 9 and 11) bordering a hydrophobic face devoid of aromatic aa residues. As we observed DMVs of larger diameter in the AH1 mutant lacking at least one lysine, we may hypothesize that NS4B AH1 plays a similar role in membrane curvature sensing and induction. Hence, AH1 may interact with the surface of a “pre-curved” membrane (large DMVs), possibly induced by AH2 or another mechanism such as NS4B oligomerization, and then further bend the membrane to end up with smaller diameter DMVs competent for RNA replication. Supporting this hypothesis, disruption of the hydrophobic face by introduction of charged residues, similar to the Atg3 mutants described by Nath et al. [29], has previously been shown to abrogate RNA replication [19].
The size and morphology of DMVs have been reported to affect the replication of HCV and other positive-strand RNA viruses. In this context, pharmacologic inhibition or silencing of phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase IIIα or of its effector oxysterol-binding protein, both of which are required for HCV RNA replication, have been shown to reduce DMV diameter [30], [31]. A direct correlation between altered DMV morphology and impaired RNA replication has been demonstrated for mutations in the C-terminal part of NS4B [24]. Mutations in murine hepatitis virus nonstructural protein 4 have been reported to affect DMV morphology and RNA replication [32] and mutations in equine arteritis virus nonstructural protein 3 have been shown to impair DMV formation [33]. However, HCV mutants that increase the diameter of DMVs have to our knowledge not been described previously. Taken together, our observations and previous reports indicate that a defined size and morphology of DMVs is required for efficient viral RNA replication.
Selection for pseudoreversions and modeling in the three-dimensional structure revealed that the two positively charged residues flanking AH1 have to be located on opposite sides of the α-helix for NS4B to be functional in HCV RNA replication. It is possible that these residues stabilize electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged phospholipid head groups in-plane of a membrane surface. Analysis of pseudorevertants indicates that laterally oriented positively charged side chains on either side of the α-helix are required irrespective of their position along the helix. However, the fact that the two lysine residues in aa positions 18 and 20 are conserved across all HCV isolates indicates that viral fitness favors the presence of the positively charged residues at these two specific positions. In keeping with our observations, a mutagenesis study performed previously in a subgenomic replicon derived from the Con1 strain (genotype 1b) identified an important role for Lys 20, with pseudoreversion to positively charged aa residues, i.e. lysine or arginine, at positions 15 or 16 [34].
Selection of aa changes in NS5A, some of which we show here to partially rescue the defect of NS4B mutant K18A, point toward functional interactions and a concerted action of NS4B and NS5A in replication complex formation, as supported by recent EM analyses of the membrane rearrangements induced by NS4B and NS5A [13] as well as earlier work on the phosphorylation of NS5A [35], [36]. In our study, we have identified an NS5A P189L change in 9 out of 10 sequenced clones. This aa change is located in domain I of NS5A, in a surface-exposed position that has the potential to interact with cytosolically oriented NS4B residue Lys 18 (not illustrated). However, it confers only a minor replication advantage in the NS4B K18A mutant context. Similarly, in a previous mutagenesis analysis of the C-terminal region of NS4B, the NS5A K139E change has been identified in several clones without conferring a major advantage for RNA replication on its own but partially required in combination with other pseudoreversions in NS4B [24]. Further investigating the interaction between NS4B and NS5A will in all likelihood reveal important insight into the roles of NS4B in HCV RNA replication and likely also virus production.
While the best known function of NS4B is its role in inducing the membrane rearrangements required for HCV RNA replication, there is growing evidence that NS4B is also involved in virus production [24],[35],[36]. The NS4B mutants described so far either enhanced virus assembly [24], [35] or decreased RNA encapsidation [36] and were all localized in the C-terminal region of NS4B. E8A/E15A is one of the first mutants reported to strongly decrease virus production with almost unimpaired HCV RNA replication capacity. Since intracellular virus titers are reduced to the same extent as extracellular titers, assembly is likely affected in this mutant. Given the evidence for functional interactions between NS4B and NS5A as well as the critical role of NS5A in virus assembly [37], [38], we may hypothesize that AH1 mutant E8A/E15A affects NS4B-NS5A interplay, thereby influencing virion assembly. Future work investigating the role of NS4B in virus production would be facilitated by the development of a complementation system that allows to separate the functions of NS4B in RNA replication and virus production.
A dual topology of the N terminus of NS4B has been suggested earlier [16], [17]. In line with these observations, we had previously shown that AH2 has the potential to traverse the phospholipid bilayer, likely upon oligomerization [15], [18]. Here, we provide evidence for a dual topology of the N-terminal part of NS4B in a functional, replicative context. A working model for these two topologies is illustrated in Figure 9. Based on its physicochemical properties, we could envision a scenario where AH1 remains in the ER lumen, possibly associated with the inner side of the ER membrane, sensing its curvature, and bending the membrane during membranous web formation. However, we believe that it is unlikely that AH1 itself traverses the membrane so that an ER luminal loop be formed between AH1 and AH2 (scenario therefore not illustrated in Fig. 9). Indeed, AH1 appears not hydrophobic enough to achieve a transmembrane topology and there is no obvious interaction platform between multiple copies of AH1 or AH1 and AH2 to yield a transmembrane hydrophobic complex.
Given the limited coding capacity of viral genomes, many encoded proteins have evolved to exert multiple functions. One strategy to achieve multifunctionality may be topological changes with respect of the membrane. In this context, the hepatitis B virus large surface protein and the fusion protein of Newcastle disease virus have been shown to adopt dual membrane topologies with potentially different functions [39], [40]. Based on these observations, it is tempting to speculate that the different topologies of NS4B may serve distinct functions in the HCV life cycle. Clearly, future work will have to address this intriguing possibility.
Materials and Methods
Sequence analyses and structure predictions
Sequence analyses were performed using the web-based tools available at the European HCV Database (http://euhcvdb.ibcp.fr/) [41] and the Network Protein Sequence Analysis (NPSA) website of the Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Protéines (IBCP) (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr) [42]. Multiple sequence alignment and analyses of aa conservation were carried out with the ClustalW program using default parameters [43]. HeliQuest was used for α-helix projections (www.heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr) [22].
Cell lines and reagents
Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines Huh-7.5 [44] (kindly provided by Charles M. Rice, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY) and Huh7-Lunet [25] were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The Huh-7-derived cell line H7-T7-IZ, which stably expresses the T7 RNA polymerase, was maintained in the same medium supplemented with 5 µg/ml zeocin [13]. Transfections were performed by the use of polyethylenimine [45]. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) C7-50 against HCV core [46], A4 against HCV E1 [47] (kindly provided by Jean Dubuisson, University of Lille, France), as well as 9E10 [48] against HCV NS5A (kindly provided by Charles M. Rice) have been described. MAb AC-15 against β-actin was from Sigma-Aldrich. MAb HA-7 and polyclonal antibody Y-11 against the HA tag were from Sigma-Aldrich and Santa Cruz, respectively. Polyclonal antibody #86 against HCV NS4B has been described [37]. Secondary antibodies were anti-mouse-HRP (GE Healthcare), anti-rabbit-HRP (DAKO), Alexa Fluor 488- and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, as well as Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies).
Plasmids
Plasmids pUHD15-1 (allowing expression of the tetracycline-regulated transactivator tTA) [49] and pUHD-Cp7con (allowing expression from a tTA-responsive promotor) were cotransfected to express core-E1-E2-p7 derived from the HCV H77 (genotype 1a) consensus clone [50], as described [51].
pFK-based plasmids pFK_Jc1_δg, pFK_Jc1ΔE1E2_δg, pFK-i389-neo-sg-JFH1, pFK_i389LucNS3-3′-NS4BHA31R_JFH_δg, pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg and the non-replicating control construct pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_NS5BΔGDD_JFH_δg have been described [14], [52], [53]. Plasmid pTM-NS3-3′_JFH allows for the T7 RNA polymerase-based expression of the HCV replicase proteins (NS3 to NS5B) [23].
Subgenomic HCV JFH1 replicon constructs harboring a bicistronic firefly luciferase reporter gene were based on pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg. Mutations K18A, K20A, K18A/K20A, KASK and E8A/E15A were generated by two-step PCR amplification using primers JFH1-5042-fd and AH1-K18A-rv, AH1-K20A-rv, AH1-KKAA-rv, AH1-KASK-rv or AH1-EEAA-rv, respectively (Table S2), followed by primers AH1-K18A-fd, AH1-K20A-fd, AH1-KKAA-fd, AH1-KASK-fd or AH1-EEAA-fd, respectively, and JFH1-7730-rv (Table S2). Final products were amplified by overlap extension PCR using primers JFH1-5042-fd and JFH1-7730-rv (Table S2), followed by cloning into the NsiI-RsrII sites of pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg, yielding constructs Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A, Luc-JFH1-AH1_K20A, Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A/K20A, Luc-JFH1-AH1_KASK and Luc-JFH1-AH1_E8A/E15A.
Neomycin-selectable subgenomic HCV JFH1 replicon constructs were generated by subcloning of the NsiI/BsrGI fragments from the Luc-JFH1 constructs above into pFK_i389-neo-sg-JFH1, yielding constructs Neo-JFH1-AH1_K18A, Neo-JFH1-AH1_K20A, Neo-JFH1-AH1_K18A/K20A and Neo-JFH1-AH1_KASK.
Pseudorevertant constructs were generated in subgenomic HCV JFH1 replicon constructs harboring a bicistronic firefly luciferase reporter gene by two-step PCR amplification using primers JFH1-5042-fd and JFH4BQ22R-rv or JFH4BQ26R-rv (Table S2) with either pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg (wild-type) or Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A as template, followed by amplification of pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg (wild-type) or the corresponding sequence harboring the NS5A K189L mutation using primers JFH4BQ22R-fd or JFH4BQ26R-fd and JFH1-7730-rv (Table S2). Final products were amplified by overlap extension PCR using primers JFH1-5042-fd and JFH1-7730-rv (Table S2), followed by cloning into the NsiI-RsrII sites of pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg, yielding constructs Luc-JFH1-AH1_Q22R, Luc-JFH1-AH1_Q26R, Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A/Q22R, Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A-5A_K189L, Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A/Q22R-5A_K189L and Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A/Q26R. Construct Luc-JFH1-AH1_K18A/Q27R was generated by PCR using primers JFH1-5042-fd and JFH1-7730-rv (Table S2), followed by the same cloning strategy.
Jc1 full-length constructs were generated by subcloning of the AvrII/RsrII fragments from the Luc-JFH1 constructs above into pFK-Jc1_δg, yielding constructs Jc1-AH1_E8A/E15A, Jc1-AH1_K18A, Jc1-AH1_K18A/Q22R, Jc1-AH1_Q26R and Jc1-AH1_K18A/Q26R. Construct Jc1-ΔGDD was generated by subcloning of the RsrII/SfiI from pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_NS5BΔGDD_JFH_δg into pFK-Jc1_δg.
pTM-based constructs harboring NS4B mutations were generated by subcloning of the NsiI/RsrII fragments from pFK_i389LucNS3-3′_JFH_δg or pFK_i389LucNS3-3′-NS4BHA31R_JFH_δg into pTM-NS3-3′, yielding constructs pTM-NS3-3′-AH1_K18A, pTM-NS3-3′-AH1_K20A, pTM-NS3-3′-AH1_K18A/K20A, pTM-NS3-3′-AH1_E8A/E15A, and pTM-NS3-3′-NS4BHA31R. Introduction of NS4B mutations into pTM-NS3-3′-NS4BHA31R was performed by two-step PCR using primers JFH1-5042-fd and AH1-KKAA-rv or AH1-EEAA-rv, followed by primers AH1-KKAA-fd or AH1-EEAA-fd and JFH1-7730-rv. Final overlap extension PCR was carried out with primers JFH1-5042-fd and JFH1-7730-rv, followed by cloning into the NsiI-RsrII sites of pTM-NS3-3′, yielding constructs pTM-NS3-3′-NS4BHA31R-AH1_K18A/K20A and pTM-NS3-3′-NS4BHA31R-AH1_E8A/E15A.
All contructs were verified by sequencing.
In vitro transcription, electroporation, transient replication and infection assays
In vitro transcription of subgenomic replicon and full-length HCV RNA as well as electroporation were performed as described ([54] and references therein). RNA replication assay using a JFH1 subgenomic replicon harboring the firefly luciferase as reporter was performed as described previously [53], [55]. Jc1 virus was produced as described [56]. TCID50 was determined as described [48]. For the determination of intracellular infectivity, cells were harvested and subjected to three freeze and thaw cycles, followed by removal of debris by centrifugation for 2 min at 11,000× g before TCID50 determination.
Immunoblot
Protein lysates were prepared and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by immunoblot analysis as described previously [57].
Peptide synthesis and purification
Peptide NS4B[1–40] from the HCV strain JFH-1 (accession number AB047639; aa sequence reported in Fig. 2) was synthesized on a Milligen 9050 apparatus, employing N-[9-fluorenyl]methoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry. The peptide was highly purified by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a Nucleosil C18 column (120 Å, 5 µm, 250 mm) using a water-acetonitrile gradient containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The peptide was eluted as a single peak at 65% acetonitrile and identified by mass spectroscopy at its expected molecular mass.
Circular dichroism
Far UV CD spectra were recorded on a Chirascan spectrometer (Applied Photophysics) calibrated with 1S-(+)-10-camphorsulfonic acid. Measurements were carried out at 298 K in a 0.1-cm path length quartz cuvette. Spectra were measured in a 180–260 nm wavelength range with an increment of 0.2 nm, bandpass of 0.5 nm and integration time of 1 s. Spectra were processed, baseline corrected, smoothed and converted with the Chirascan software. Spectral units were expressed as the mean molar ellipticity per residue by using the peptide concentration determined knowing the weighted NS4B[1–40] peptide used to prepare the NMR sample. Estimation of the secondary structure content was carried out on the DICHROWEB server (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/cdweb/) [58].
NMR spectroscopy
Purified NS4B[1–40] peptide was dissolved in a mixture of 50% TFE-d2 (>99%) in H2O (v/v), and 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate was added to the NMR samples as an internal 1H chemical shift reference. Multidimensional experiments were performed at 25°C on a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer using standard homonuclear pulse sequences, including nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) (mixing times between 100 and 250 ms) and clean total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) (isotropic mixing time of 80 ms), as detailed previously [59], [60]. Water suppression was achieved by pre-saturation. Bruker Topspin software was used to process all data and Sparky was used for spectral analysis (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/). Intra-residue backbone resonances and aliphatic side chains were identified from homonuclear 1H TOCSY experiments and confirmed with 1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments in 13C natural abundance. Sequential assignments were determined by correlating intra-residue assignments with inter-residue cross peaks observed in bi-dimensional 1H NOESY. NMR-derived 1Hα and 13Cα chemical shifts are reported relative to the random coil chemical shifts in TFE [61].
NMR-derived constraints and structure calculation
NOE intensities used as input for structure calculations were obtained from the NOESY spectrum recorded with a 150 ms mixing time and checked for spin diffusion on spectra recorded at lower mixing times (50 ms). NOEs were partitioned into three categories of intensities that were converted into distances ranging from a common lower limit of 1.8 Å to upper limits of 2.8, 3.9 and 5.0 Å, respectively. Protons without stereospecific assignments were treated as pseudoatoms, and the correction factors were added to the upper distance constraints [62]. Additionally, dihedral angle constraints calculated with Talos [63] from 1H and 13C chemical shifts were introduced. Three-dimensional structures were generated from NOE distances with the standard torsion angle molecular dynamics protocol in the XPLOR-NIH 2.30 program [64] using the standard force fields and default parameter sets. A set of 50 structures was initially calculated to widely sample the conformational space, and the structures of low energy with no distance restraint violations (>0.5 Å) were retained. The selected structures were compared by pairwise root-mean square deviation (RMSD) over the backbone atom coordinates (N, Cα and C′). Local analogies were analyzed by calculating the local RMSD of a tripeptide window sliding along the sequence. Statistical analyses, superimposition of structures and structural analyses were performed with MOLMOL [65] and the PDB Protein Structure Validation Suite.
Selection for pseudorevertants, amplification of HCV RNA by RT-PCR, and sequence analyses
Huh-7.5 cells were electroporated with 1 µg in vitro transcribed RNA from neomycin-selectable subgenomic replicon constructs. Electroporated cells were resuspended in 10 ml of medium, followed by seeding of 10 µl, 100 µl or 1 ml into 10-cm tissue culture dishes. After 24 h, G418 was added at a concentration of 500 µg/ml and maintained until single cell clones became visible. Total RNA was extracted from pooled clones by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One µg total RNA was reverse transcribed with specific anchor primer JFH1-9442-rv, followed by PCR amplification using primers EMCV-fd and JFH1-9442-rv using PfuTurbo DNA Polymerase (Stratagene). Amplicons were cloned with Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (Life Technologies), followed by sequencing of 10 clones.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and HCV RNA levels were measured by SYBR green real-time PCR, as described [55].
Selective permeabilization
H7-T7-IZ or Huh7-Lunet replicon cells were seeded onto glass coverslips. H7-T7-IZ cells were transfected 24 h later with pTM-NS3-3′ plasmids or with pUHD15-1 and pUHD-Cp7, allowing expression of the HCV core-p7 region. Twenty-four h post-transfection cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and then permeabilized for 15 min at 4°C either by 0.2% or 0.05% digitonin (Sigma-Aldrich). Indirect immunofluorescence was performed as described previously [57]. Slides were viewed on a Leica SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope.
Electron microscopy
Huh7-Lunet T7 cells were seeded onto glass coverslips. On the next day the cells were transfected with pTM-NS3-3′-based expression vectors by using the TransIT-LT1 transfection reagent (Mirus Bio). After 24 h the cells were washed three times with prewarmed PBS, fixed and processed for EM as described previously [24]. Specimens were examined with a Zeiss EM 10 transmission electron microscope at 60 kV.
Statistical analyses
Significance values were calculated by using the unpaired t test with the GraphPad Prism 6 software package (GraphPad Software).
Accession numbers
The atomic coordinates for the NMR structure of synthetic peptide NS4B[1–40] and the corresponding NMR restraints in 50% TFE are available in the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank under accession number 2LVG (RCSB identification code 102881). The chemical shifts of NS4B[1–40] residues have been deposited in the BioMagResBank (BMRB) under the accession number 18568.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. Various authors (2011) Nature Outlook: Hepatitis C. Nature 474: S1–S21.
2. Lindenbach BD, Murray CL, Thiel H-J, Rice CM (2013) Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, al e, editors. Fields Virology. New York, NY: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
3. BurbeloPD, DuboviEJ, SimmondsP, MedinaJL, HenriquezJA, et al. (2012) Serology-enabled discovery of genetically diverse hepaciviruses in a new host. J Virol 86: 6171–6178.
4. LauckM, SibleySD, LaraJ, PurdyMA, KhudyakovY, et al. (2013) A novel hepacivirus with an unusually long and intrinsically disordered NS5A protein in a wild Old World primate. J Virol 87: 8971–8981.
5. MoradpourD, PeninF (2013) Hepatitis C virus proteins: from structure to function. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 369: 113–142.
6. MoradpourD, PeninF, RiceCM (2007) Replication of hepatitis C virus. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 453–463.
7. den BoonJA, DiazA, AhlquistP (2010) Cytoplasmic viral replication complexes. Cell Host Microbe 8: 77–85.
8. PaulD, BartenschlagerR (2013) Architecture and biogenesis of plus-strand RNA virus replication factories. World J Virol 2: 32–48.
9. Chatel-ChaixL, BartenschlagerR (2014) Dengue virus- and hepatitis C virus-induced replication and assembly compartments: the enemy inside - caught in the web. J Virol 88: 5907–5911.
10. EggerD, WölkB, GosertR, BianchiL, BlumHE, et al. (2002) Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins induces distinct membrane alterations including a candidate viral replication complex. J Virol 76: 5974–5984.
11. GosertR, EggerD, LohmannV, BartenschlagerR, BlumHE, et al. (2003) Identification of the hepatitis C virus RNA replication complex in Huh-7 cells harboring subgenomic replicons. J Virol 77: 5487–5492.
12. GouttenoireJ, PeninF, MoradpourD (2010) Hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 4B: a journey into unexplored territory. Rev Med Virol 20: 117–129.
13. Romero-BreyI, MerzA, ChiramelA, LeeJY, ChlandaP, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional architecture and biogenesis of membrane structures associated with hepatitis C virus replication. PLoS Pathog 8: e1003056.
14. PaulD, HoppeS, SaherG, Krijnse-LockerJ, BartenschlagerR (2013) Morphological and biochemical characterization of the membranous hepatitis C virus replication compartment. J Virol 87: 10612–10627.
15. GouttenoireJ, CastetV, MontserretR, AroraN, RaussensV, et al. (2009) Identification of a novel determinant for membrane association in hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 4B. J Virol 83: 6257–6268.
16. LundinM, MonneM, WidellA, Von HeijneG, PerssonMA (2003) Topology of the membrane-associated hepatitis C virus protein NS4B. J Virol 77: 5428–5438.
17. LundinM, LindstromH, GronwallC, PerssonMA (2006) Dual topology of the processed hepatitis C virus protein NS4B is influenced by the NS5A protein. J Gen Virol 87: 3263–3272.
18. GouttenoireJ, RoingeardP, PeninF, MoradpourD (2010) Amphipathic alpha-helix AH2 is a major determinant for the oligomerization of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 4B. J Virol 84: 12529–12537.
19. ElazarM, LiuP, RiceCM, GlennJS (2004) An N-terminal amphipathic helix in hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS4B mediates membrane association, correct localization of replication complex proteins, and HCV RNA replication. J Virol 78: 11393–11400.
20. Palomares-JerezF, NemesioH, VillalainJ (2012) The membrane spanning domains of protein NS4B from hepatitis C virus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 2958–2966.
21. WishartDS, SykesBD, RichardsFM (1992) The chemical shift index: a fast and simple method for the assignment of protein secondary structure through NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 31: 1647–1651.
22. GautierR, DouguetD, AntonnyB, DrinG (2008) HELIQUEST: a web server to screen sequences with specific alpha-helical properties. Bioinformatics 24: 2101–2102.
23. BackesP, QuinkertD, ReissS, BinderM, ZayasM, et al. (2010) Role of annexin A2 in the production of infectious hepatitis C virus particles. J Virol 84: 5775–5789.
24. PaulD, Romero-BreyI, GouttenoireJ, StoitsovaS, Krijnse-LockerJ, et al. (2011) NS4B self-interaction through conserved C-terminal elements is required for the establishment of functional hepatitis C virus replication complexes. J Virol 85: 6963–6976.
25. FriebeP, BoudetJ, SimorreJ-P, BartenschlagerR (2005) A kissing loop interaction in the 3′ end of the hepatitis C virus genome essential for RNA replication. J Virol 79: 380–392.
26. GouttenoireJ, MontserretR, KennelA, PeninF, MoradpourD (2009) An amphipathic alpha-helix at the C terminus of NS4B mediates membrane association. J Virol 83: 11378–11384.
27. DrinG, CasellaJF, GautierR, BoehmerT, SchwartzTU, et al. (2007) A general amphipathic alpha-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 138–146.
28. DrinG, AntonnyB (2010) Amphipathic helices and membrane curvature. FEBS Lett 584: 1840–1847.
29. NathS, DancourtJ, ShteynV, PuenteG, FongWM, et al. (2014) Lipidation of the LC3/GABARAP family of autophagy proteins relies on a membrane-curvature-sensing domain in Atg3. Nat Cell Biol 16: 415–424.
30. ReissS, RebhanI, BackesP, Romero-BreyI, ErfleH, et al. (2011) Recruitment and activation of a lipid kinase by hepatitis C virus NS5A is essential for integrity of the membranous replication compartment. Cell Host Microbe 9: 32–45.
31. WangH, PerryJW, LauringAS, NeddermannP, De FrancescoR, et al. (2014) Oxysterol-binding protein is a phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase effector required for HCV replication membrane integrity and cholesterol trafficking. Gastroenterology 146: 1373–1385.
32. GadlageMJ, SparksJS, BeachboardDC, CoxRG, DoyleJD, et al. (2010) Murine hepatitis virus nonstructural protein 4 regulates virus-induced membrane modifications and replication complex function. J Virol 84: 280–290.
33. PosthumaCC, PedersenKW, LuZ, JoostenRG, RoosN, et al. (2008) Formation of the arterivirus replication/transcription complex: a key role for nonstructural protein 3 in the remodeling of intracellular membranes. J Virol 82: 4480–4491.
34. BlightKJ (2011) Charged residues in hepatitis C virus NS4B are critical for multiple NS4B functions in RNA replication. J Virol 85: 8158–8171.
35. JonesDM, PatelAH, Targett-AdamsP, McLauchlanJ (2009) The hepatitis C virus NS4B protein can trans-complement viral RNA replication and modulates production of infectious virus. J Virol 83: 2163–2177.
36. HanQ, MannaD, BeltonK, ColeR, KonanKV (2013) Modulation of hepatitis C virus genome encapsidation by nonstructural protein 4B. J Virol 87: 7409–7422.
37. AppelN, ZayasM, MillerS, Krijnse-LockerJ, SchallerT, et al. (2008) Essential role of domain III of nonstructural protein 5A for hepatitis C virus infectious particle assembly. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000035.
38. TellinghuisenTL, FossKL, TreadawayJ (2008) Regulation of hepatitis C virion production via phosphorylation of the NS5A protein. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000032.
39. LambertC, PrangeR (2001) Dual topology of the hepatitis B virus large envelope protein: determinants influencing post-translational pre-S translocation. J Biol Chem 276: 22265–22272.
40. PantuaH, McGinnesLW, LeszykJ, MorrisonTG (2005) Characterization of an alternate form of Newcastle disease virus fusion protein. J Virol 79: 11660–11670.
41. CombetC, GarnierN, CharavayC, GrandoD, CrisanD, et al. (2007) euHCVdb: the European hepatitis C virus database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D363–366.
42. CombetC, BlanchetC, GeourjonC, DeléageG (2000) NPS@: network protein sequence analysis. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 147–150.
43. ThompsonJD, HigginsDG, GibsonTJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
44. BlightKJ, McKeatingJA, RiceCM (2002) Highly permissive cell lines for subgenomic and genomic hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J Virol 76: 13001–13014.
45. GoulaD, RemyJS, ErbacherP, WasowiczM, LeviG, et al. (1998) Size, diffusibility and transfection performance of linear PEI/DNA complexes in the mouse central nervous system. Gene Ther 5: 712–717.
46. MoradpourD, WakitaT, TokushigeK, CarlsonRI, KrawczynskiK, et al. (1996) Characterization of three novel monoclonal antibodies against hepatitis C virus core protein. J Med Virol 48: 234–241.
47. DubuissonJ, HsuHH, CheungRC, GreenbergHB, RussellDG, et al. (1994) Formation and intracellular localization of hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein complexes expressed by recombinant vaccinia and Sindbis viruses. J Virol 68: 6147–6160.
48. LindenbachBD, EvansMJ, SyderAJ, WölkB, TellinghuisenTL, et al. (2005) Complete replication of hepatitis C virus in cell culture. Science 309: 623–626.
49. GossenM, BujardH (1992) Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 5547–5551.
50. KolykhalovAA, AgapovEV, BlightKJ, MihalikK, FeinstoneSM, et al. (1997) Transmission of hepatitis C by intrahepatic inoculation with transcribed RNA. Science 277: 570–574.
51. IvashkinaN, WölkB, LohmannV, BartenschlagerR, BlumHE, et al. (2002) The hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase membrane insertion sequence is a transmembrane segment. J Virol 76: 13088–13093.
52. WakitaT, PietschmannT, KatoT, DateT, MiyamotoM, et al. (2005) Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome. Nat Med 11: 791–796.
53. SchallerT, AppelN, KoutsoudakisG, KallisS, LohmannV, et al. (2007) Analysis of hepatitis C virus superinfection exclusion by using novel fluorochrome gene-tagged viral genomes. J Virol 81: 4591–4603.
54. MoradpourD, EvansMJ, GosertR, YuanZH, BlumHE, et al. (2004) Insertion of green fluorescent protein into nonstructural protein 5A allows direct visualization of functional hepatitis C virus replication complexes. J Virol 78: 7400–7409.
55. BellecaveP, GouttenoireJ, GajerM, BrassV, KoutsoudakisG, et al. (2009) Hepatitis B and C virus coinfection: A novel model system reveals the absence of direct viral interference. Hepatology 50: 46–55.
56. PietschmannT, KaulA, KoutsoudakisG, ShavinskayaA, KallisS, et al. (2006) Construction and characterization of infectious intragenotypic and intergenotypic hepatitis C virus chimeras. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 7408–7413.
57. MoradpourD, KaryP, RiceCM, BlumHE (1998) Continuous human cell lines inducibly expressing hepatitis C virus structural and nonstructural proteins. Hepatology 28: 192–201.
58. WhitmoreL, WallaceBA (2004) DICHROWEB, an online server for protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W668–673.
59. PeninF, GeourjonC, MontserretR, BockmannA, LesageA, et al. (1997) Three-dimensional structure of the DNA-binding domain of the fructose repressor from Escherichia coli by 1H and 15N NMR. J Mol Biol 270: 496–510.
60. MontserretR, SaintN, VanbelleC, SalvayAG, SimorreJP, et al. (2010) NMR structure and ion channel activity of the p7 protein from hepatitis C virus. J Biol Chem 285: 31446–31461.
61. MerutkaG, DysonHJ, WrightPE (1995) ‘Random coil’ 1H chemical shifts obtained as a function of temperature and trifluoroethanol concentration for the peptide series GGXGG. J Biomol NMR 5: 14–24.
62. Wüthrich K (1986) NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
63. CornilescuG, DelaglioF, BaxA (1999) Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J Biomol NMR 13: 289–302.
64. SchwietersCD, KuszewskiJJ, TjandraN, CloreGM (2003) The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 160: 65–73.
65. KoradiR, BilleterM, WuthrichK (1996) MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 14: 51–55, 29–32.
66. SimmondsP, BukhJ, CombetC, DeleageG, EnomotoN, et al. (2005) Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 42: 962–973.
67. WimleyWC, WhiteSH (1996) Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces. Nat Struct Biol 3: 842–848.
68. HumphreyW, DalkeA, SchultenK (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33–38, 27–38.
69. GuexN, PeitschMC (1997) SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18: 2714–2723.
70. SchneiderCA, RasbandWS, EliceiriKW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 671–675.
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiologie Infekční lékařství LaboratořČlánek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2014 Číslo 11
- Perorální antivirotika jako vysoce efektivní nástroj prevence hospitalizací kvůli COVID-19 − otázky a odpovědi pro praxi
- Stillova choroba: vzácné a závažné systémové onemocnění
- Diagnostický algoritmus při podezření na syndrom periodické horečky
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Diagnostika virových hepatitid v kostce – zorientujte se (nejen) v sérologii
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Coronavirus Cell Entry Occurs through the Endo-/Lysosomal Pathway in a Proteolysis-Dependent Manner
- War and Infectious Diseases: Challenges of the Syrian Civil War
- The Epithelial αvβ3-Integrin Boosts the MYD88-Dependent TLR2 Signaling in Response to Viral and Bacterial Components
- Peculiarities of Prion Diseases