Outcome measurement in hand surgery – a brief overview

1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010, 363(26): 2477–2481.

2. Macey AC., Burke FD., Abbott K., et al. Outcomes of hand surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20(6): 841–855.

3. Zyluk A., Piotuch B. A comparison of DASH, PEM and Levine questionnaires in outcome measurement of carpal tunnel release. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011, 43(3): 162–166.

4. Churruca K., Pomare C., Ellis LA., et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021, 24(4): 1015–1024.

5. Brand P., Hollister A. Clinical mechanics of the hand. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby1993: 342.

6. Ferreira-Valente MA., Pais-Ribeiro JL., Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011, 152(10): 2399–2404.

7. Abdelgadir J., Ong EW., Abdalla SM., et al. Demographic factors associated with patient-reported outcome measures in pain management. Pain Physician. 2020, 23(1): 17–24.

8. Fillingim RB., Loeser JD., Baron R., et al. Assess­ment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanisms. J Pain. 2016, 17 (9 Suppl): T10–20.

9. Buchwald Lawton E. Activities of daily living for physical rehabilitation. New York and London: McGraw-Hil. 1963.

10. Young VL., Pin P., Kraemer BA., et al. Fluctuation in grip and pinch grip strength among normal subjects. J Hand Surg Am. 1989, 14(1): 125–129.

11. Rodrigues J. Outcome measurement in hand surgery. [online]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc01wtAaQrE.

12. Bradley A. An evaluation of the current methods used in assessment of outcomes in hand surgery. Br J Hand Ther. 1993, 1(7): 4–7.

13. Moberg E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1958, 40(B3): 454–476.

14. Janssens A., Thompson Coon J., Rogers M., et al. A systematic review of generic multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures for children, part I: descriptive characteristics. Value Health. 2015, 18(2): 315–333.

15. Kortlever JTP., Somogyi JR., Ring D., et al. A comparison of nerve-specific, condition-specific, and upper extremity-specific patient-reported outcome measures in patients with carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2022, 47(8): 791.e1–791.e10.

16. Dias JJ., Rajan RA., Thompson JR. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the patient evaluation measure, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand and the Michigan hand outcome measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008, 33(1): 9–17.

17. MacDermid JC., Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004, 17(1): 18–23.

18. Frost MH., Reeve BB., Liepa AM., et al. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measure? Value Health. 2007, 10 (Suppl 2): 94–105.

19. Mokkink LB., Terwee CB., Knol DL., et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarificitation of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010, 10(1): 22.

20. Hawkins M., Elsworth GR., Osborne RH. Application of validity theory and metodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity. Qual Life Res. 2018, 27(7): 1695–1710.

21. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Condition specific PROMs. [online]. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/indicators-measurement-and-reporting/patient-reported-outcomes/proms-lists/condition-specific-proms.

22. Marx RG., Bombardier C., Hogg-Johnson S., et al. Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999, 52(2): 105–111.

23. Gummesson C., Ward MM., Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 18(7): 44.

24. Chung KC., Pillsbury MS., Walters MR., et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23(4): 575–587.

25. Levine DW., Simmons BP., Koris MJ., et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993, 75(11): 1585–1592.

26. Dotazník BCTSQ. Praha: Česká společnost chirurgie ruky ČLS JEP; c2009 [online]. Available from: https://d6scj24zvfbbo.cloudfront.net/5193a02f83ef0701998b347dd209374b/200000145-3c3a53d382/Boston%20Carpal%20tunnel%20syndrome%20questionnaire.pdf.

27. MacDermid JC., Turgeon T., Richards RS., et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998, 12(8): 577–586.

28. MacDermid JC. The PRWE/PRWHE update. J Hand Ther. 2019, 32(2): 292–294.

29. Dreiser RL., Maheu E., Guillou GB., et al. Validation of an algofunctional index for osteoarthritis of the hand. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1995, 62 (6 Suppl 1): 43S–53S.

30. van Riel PL., Schumacher HR Jr. How does one assess early rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2001, 15(1): 67–76.

31. Fries JF., Spitz P., Kraines RG., et al. Measure­ment of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1980, 23(2): 137–145.

32. Ware JE Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30(6): 473–483.

33. Vaňásková E. Testování v rehabilitační praxi – cévní mozkové příhody. Brno: Národní centrum ošetřovatelství a nelékařských zdravotnických oborů. 2004.

34. Williams SJ., Calnan M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract. 1991, 8(3): 237–242.

35. MacDermid JC., Fox E., Richards RS., et al. Validity of pulp-to-palm distance as a measure of finger flexion. J Hand Surgery. 2001, 26(5): 432–435.