Objective and subjective assessment of Dupuytren's contracture

Stáhnout PDF

Autoři: J. Menoušek ^1,2; Z. Dvořák T. Šácha ^{1,2 2}
Působiště autorů: Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic ¹; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic ²
Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 65, 2, 2023, pp. 74-78
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202374

Zdroje

1. Krejča M., et al. Ektopické léze. In: Dupuytrenova nemoc. 2. doplněné a přepracované vydání. Praha: Grada Publishing 2017: 43–46.

2. Haase S., Chung KC. Dupuytren disease, an issue of hand clinics. Elsevier Health Sciences 2018.

3. Elliot D. The early history of contracture of the palmar fascia. Part 2: the revolution in Paris: Guil-laume Dupuytren: Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Br. 1988, 13(4): 371–378.

4. Luck JV. Dupuytren’s contracture; a new concept of the pathogenesis correlated with surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959, 41-A(4): 635–664.

5. Hueston JT. Recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963, 31: 66–69.

6. Hindocha S., Stanley JK., Watson S., et al. Dupuytren’s diathesis revisited: evaluation of prognostic indicators for risk of disease recurrence. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31(10): 1626–1634.

7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

8. Meyerding HW. Dupuytren’s contracture. Arch Surg. 1936, 32(2): 320–333.

9. Karfík V. Dupuytrenova kontraktura: studie a operační návod. Praha: Spol. č. lékařů 1949.

10. Iselin M., Iselin F. Maladie de Dupuytren. In: Traité de chirurgie de la main. Paris: Éditions Médicales Flammarion 1967: 667–713.

11. Mikkelsen OA. Dupuytren’s disease – a study of the pattern of distribution and stage of contracture in the hand. Hand. 1976, 8(3): 265–271.

12. Tubiana R., Michon J., Thomine JM. Scheme for the assessment of deformities in Dupuytren’s disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1968, 48(5): 979–984.

13. Tubiana R, Thomine JM, Mackin E. Examination of the Hand and Wrist. CRC Press; 1998. 412 p.

14. Beaton DE., Wright JG., Katz JN., et al. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87(5): 1038–1046.

15. Hudak PL., Amadio PC., Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996, 29(6): 602–608.

16. DASH. [online]. Available from: https://dash.iwh.on.ca/access/quickdash/122983.

17. Chung KC., Pillsbury MS., Walters MR., et al. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23(4): 575–587.

18. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. [online]. Available from: https://umich.flintbox.com/technologies/8089f106-43b8-469a-9228-a99e14d2e5f3.

19. Mohan A., Vadher J., Ismail H., et al. The Southampton Dupuytren’s Scoring Scheme. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014, 48(1): 28–33.

20. Introducing ChatGPT. [online]. Available from: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt.

21. What Is ChatGPT? A review of the AI in its own words – Forbes advisor. [online]. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/what-is-chatgpt/.