Rsph4a is essential for the triplet radial spoke head assembly of the mouse motile cilia
Authors:
Hiroshi Yoke aff001; Hironori Ueno aff002; Akihiro Narita aff003; Takafumi Sakai aff001; Kahoru Horiuchi aff001; Chikako Shingyoji aff001; Hiroshi Hamada aff004; Kyosuke Shinohara aff001
Authors place of work:
Department of Biotechnology & Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture & Technology, Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
aff001; Molecular Function & Life Sciences, Aichi University of Education, Kariya, Aichi, Japan
aff002; Structural Biology Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
aff003; Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Kobe, Japan
aff004
Published in the journal:
Rsph4a is essential for the triplet radial spoke head assembly of the mouse motile cilia. PLoS Genet 16(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008664
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008664
Summary
Motile cilia/flagella are essential for swimming and generating extracellular fluid flow in eukaryotes. Motile cilia harbor a 9+2 arrangement consisting of nine doublet microtubules with dynein arms at the periphery and a pair of singlet microtubules at the center (central pair). In the central system, the radial spoke has a T-shaped architecture and regulates the motility and motion pattern of cilia. Recent cryoelectron tomography data reveal three types of radial spokes (RS1, RS2, and RS3) in the 96 nm axoneme repeat unit; however, the molecular composition of the third radial spoke, RS3 is unknown. In human pathology, it is well known mutation of the radial spoke head-related genes causes primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) including respiratory defect and infertility. Here, we describe the role of the primary ciliary dyskinesia protein Rsph4a in the mouse motile cilia. Cryoelectron tomography reveals that the mouse trachea cilia harbor three types of radial spoke as with the other vertebrates and that all triplet spoke heads are lacking in the trachea cilia of Rsph4a-deficient mice. Furthermore, observation of ciliary movement and immunofluorescence analysis indicates that Rsph4a contributes to the generation of the planar beating of motile cilia by building the distal architecture of radial spokes in the trachea, the ependymal tissues, and the oviduct. Although detailed mechanism of RSs assembly remains unknown, our results suggest Rsph4a is a generic component of radial spoke heads, and could explain the severe phenotype of human PCD patients with RSPH4A mutation.
Keywords:
Sperm – Microtubules – Immunofluorescence – Cilia – Dyneins – Tubulins – Subcellular localization – Trachea
Introduction
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a recessive genetic disease caused by defects in motile cilia function. To date, numerous causal genes have been identified in PCD patients [1]. Typical PCD causal genes are involved in the assembly of the axonemal dynein complex of human motile cilia [2–10]. In mice and humans, multiple motile cilia exist in the trachea, brain/ependymal, oviduct, inner ear, nasal, and testis. The mouse multiple motile cilia have a 9+2 type geometry that contains nine peripheral doublet microtubules with dynein arms, single microtubules at the center of the axoneme (central pair; CP), and radial spokes (RSs). CPs and RSs cooperatively control dynein activity via a mechanochemical interaction [11–13]. In addition to the axonemal dynein-related genes, deficiency of the RSs-related proteins also causes the PCD phenotype in humans [14–17]. Circular motion rather than planar beating of respiratory cilia is observed in human PCD patients who harbor RSPH1, RSPH4A, and RSPH9 mutations [14, 18, 19]. Furthermore, Frommer et al. found that RSPH4A rather than RSPH1 and RSPH9 plays a central role in radial spoke head assembly by immunofluorescence analyses of respiratory cilia in PCD patients [20]. In the patients, various ultrastructural defects of respiratory cilia was observed including translocation of outer doublet into the center, absence of central pair, single microtubule in the center, extra central microtubule, extra outer microtubule [14]. The proportion of respiratory cilia with normal axonemal structure is 50% in human RSPH4A patients [18], whereas it is 80% in RSPH1 patients [16], suggesting that the phenotype of the RSPH4A mutation is more severe than the RSPH1 mutation. Another RSs-related protein, RSPH3 is critical for the assembly of radial spoke in the human respiratory cilia and its mutation causes PCD [21]. Rsph6a is essential for the assembly of mouse sperm flagella and fertility [22].
In terms of structure, RSs are beneficial architecture. Most eukaryotic species, except for Chlamydomonas and S. bulatta, have the three types of RSs (RS1, RS2, RS3) within the 96 nm axoneme repeat unit [23, 24]. The RSs maintain evolutionarily conserved T-shaped morphology but have distinct detailed ultrastructures. In Chlamydomonas, RS1 and RS2 show similar ultrastructures. The spoke heads look like a parallelogram plate in a two-fold rotational symmetry. RS3 is missing, but the base and part of the stalk (called RS3-S) are retained [25]. Metazoa, sea urchin sperm, zebrafish sperm, and human respiratory cilia show triplet RSs revealed by cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) [17, 26, 27]. Interestingly, RS3 is unaffected in human PCD patients with RSPH1 mutations, suggesting that the molecular composition is distinct among the three types of RSs [17]. Thus, the molecular basis of RS3 remains unknown [17, 28]. In this work, we examined the structure of RSs in mouse motile cilia by cryo-ET and immunofluorescence. Using wild-type (WT) mice and Rsph4a KO mice, we found that Rsph4a is essential for the assembly of the RS heads of the three types of RSs, and deficiency of Rsph4a leads to typical PCD phenotypes due to the abnormal motion pattern of the mouse motile cilia in the trachea, brain, and oviduct.
Results
Rsph4a regulates the motion pattern of mouse motile cilia
In a previous study, Shinohara et al. reported that the ciliary motion pattern of trachea cilia was disorganized in Rsph4a KO mice. The cilia showed clockwise rotation motion rather than planar beating [29]. The Rsph4a KO mice show hydrocephalus which is a typical phenotype of PCD (Fig 1A). To study the comprehensive role of Rsph4a in mice, we examined the motion of the ependymal cilia in the subventricular zone and the oviduct cilia in addition to the observation of the trachea cilia. In the trachea, we again observed a change in the motion pattern in Rsph4a KO mice. The trachea cilia show clockwise rotation, whereas they show planar beating in the WT mice (Fig 1B, S1 Video, S2 Video), and we have confirmed the reproducibility of previous observations [29]. The phenotype is different from that in the trachea cilia in both in the ependymal cilia and the oviduct cilia. In the WT mice, all the ependymal cilia and the oviduct cilia show planar beating (Fig 1C and 1D; N = 80 cells, S3 Video, S5 Video). In Rsph4a KO mice, all the ependymal cilia show irregular motion, including rotation and wavy motion (Fig 1C N = 60 cells, S4 Video). The oviduct cilia show the two types of motion patterns, including anti-clockwise rotation (27%, N = 52 cells) and beating with small amplitude (73%, N = 52 cells) in Rsph4a KO mice (Fig 1D, S6 Video, S7 Video). Our observations suggest that Rsph4a regulates the motion pattern of the mouse motile cilia, although the phenotype is different among the cell types.
Cryoelectron tomography revealed the ultrastructure of the mouse motile cilia
To address the mechanism of regulation of ciliary motion pattern and the role of Rsph4a protein, we next examined the ultrastructure of mouse motile cilia by cryo-ET. We analyzed the ultrastructure of the mouse trachea cilia because it is possible to isolate and collect trachea cilia for cryo-ET [30]. We dissected the mouse trachea and delicately rubbed it onto the wall of the tube to isolate cilia. Then, trachea cilia are frozen in liquid ethane and observed by a cryoelectron microscope (cryo-EM) [30] (S1 Fig & Materials and methods). By subtomogram averaging, the ultrastructure of the 96 nm repeating unit of axoneme was visualized (Fig 2A–2C). In the 96 nm axoneme unit of the mouse trachea cilia, four outer dynein arms with two heads (pink), seven types of inner dynein (purple) arms, and a dynein regulatory complex (N-DRC; yellow) were observed (Fig 2A & 2C). Resolution of the averaged structure of the 96 nm axonemal repeat is 4.5 nm (Fourier shell coordination = 0.5, Fig 2D). These results suggest that the structure and arrangement of dynein arms of mouse trachea cilia are quite similar to those in human respiratory cilia (Fig 2E, [17]) and in zebrafish sperm (Fig 2F, [27]). On the RSs, however, there is a distinct feature compared with RSs in the other vertebrates. In RS3, the spoke head is more compact than that in human respiratory cilia, and the physical contact between RS2 and RS3 was not observed in the mouse trachea cilia. Alternatively, an axial protrusion was observed at the proximal side of the radial spoke head of RS3, and this architecture was physically close to the neck/arch of RS2 (Fig 2A and 2B). The protrusion was also observed at the base of radial spokes in sea urchin sperm [26]. In terms of the standing angle to the doublet microtubule (Fig 3A–3D), RS3 has a unique feature: the angle of the spoke head-stalk axis is different between RS1/RS2 and RS3 because the stalk of RS3 shows bending at the base (Fig 3D). The cryo-ET data of the WT trachea cilia suggest that RS2 and RS3 share similar morphological features, but the base and stalk architectures differ from each other.
Rsph4a is essential for triplet radial spoke head assembly in the mouse motile cilia
We next examined the effect of Rsph4a deficiency on the ultrastructure of the mouse trachea cilia. In Rsph4a KO mice, all three types of spoke heads are missing, suggesting that Rsph4a plays a critical role in triplet spoke head assembly (Fig 4A and 4B, S2 Fig). Unexpectedly, furthermore, the spoke head and the neck/arch were missing in each RS in Rsph4a KO mouse. (Fig 4C–4E). To validate these findings, we examined the subcellular localization of radial spoke head proteins by immunostaining (Fig 5, Fig 6, Fig 7). Rsph4a localized in the trachea cilia of the WT mice but was lost in Rsph4a KO mice (Fig 5A–5F). Ciliary localizations of Rsph4a were missing in Rsph4a KO mice both in the ependymal cells (brain) and the oviduct cells (Fig 6A–6F, Fig 7A–7F). We next examined the localization of the two kinds of spoke head homolog proteins, Rsph9 and Rsph1. In the WT mice, Rsph9 and Rsph1 were localized in the trachea cilia, the ependymal cilia, and the oviduct cilia (Fig 5G–5I & 5M–5O, Fig 6G–6I & 6M–6O, Fig 7G–7I & 7M–7O). In Rsph4a KO mice, however, the ciliary localization of Rsph9 was dramatically reduced in the tissues (Fig 5J–5L, Fig 6J–6L, Fig 7J–7L).While ciliary localization of Rsph1 is reduced in the oviduct (Fig 7P–7R), it retains in the trachea and the ependymal cells of Rsph4a KO mice (Fig 5P–5R, Fig 6P–6R). To examine the level of protein, we carried out western blotting of these proteins (S3 Fig). In the trachea, we observe significant difference of protein level of Rsph1 between the wildtype and Rsph4a KO mice. The immunofluorescence data and the western blotting data suggest that Rsph4a is essential for the assembly of the spoke head complex in the mouse motile cilia. We finally examined the localization of Rsph23, a homolog of Chlamydomonas neck/arch protein Rsp23 [20, 25, 31–34]. A very recent work reports that Mutation of Rsph23/NME5 leads to PCD phenotype in Alaskan Malamutes [34]. In the WT mice, ciliary localization of Rsph23 was observed in the trachea, ependymal, and oviduct cells (Fig 5S–5U, Fig 6S–6U, Fig 7S–7U). Conversely, Rsph23 was not localized in the axoneme of the motile cilia in the ependymal tissue and the oviduct tissues in Rsph4a KO mice (Fig 6V–6X, Fig 7V–7X). In the trachea, weak staining of Rsph23 retained in the ciliated cells of Rsph4a KO mice (Fig 5V–5X). To validate the difference of level of protein, we carried out western blotting using the trachea tissues and we observed significant difference of protein level of Rsph23 between the wildtype and Rsph4a KO mice (S3 Fig). The western blotting data indicate that Rsph23 was reduced in the trachea cells of Rsph4a KO mice (S3 Fig). Our immunofluorescence data as well as the cryo-ET data suggest that the spoke head and the neck/arch are disrupted in the absence of Rsph4a in the mouse motile cilia.
Discussion
Previous works have revealed that the morphology of RS3 is different from that of RS1 and RS2 [17, 25]. Additionally, in the mouse trachea cilia, the morphology of the stalk of RS3 is unique compared with that of RS1 and RS2 (Fig 3). On the other hand, all triplet spoke heads utilize Rsph4a as a common building block (Fig 4). The triplet spoke heads are absent in the Chlamydomonas pf1 mutant with the Rsp4 mutation, whereas the spoke head of RS3 remains in the human RSPH1 mutation [17, 25]. Given that radial spoke head–deficient cells (pf1) are paralyzed in Chlamydomonas [13], a study has suggested that the remaining RS3 retains the motility of cilia in humans with RSPH1 mutations [17]. Our data, however, suggest that the spoke heads of RS3 are not critical for the motility of the mouse cilia and that the axonemal dyneins and the doublet microtubules are sufficient for the generation of the circular motion of the mouse cilia. As a proof of this concept, eel sperm and mouse node cilia show rotational motion in the absence of RSs [29, 35, 36]. If so, what is the role of RS3? One possibility is that RS3 compensates for the function of RS1 and RS2. The proportion of respiratory cilia with normal axonemal structure is 50% in human RSPH4A patients [18], whereas it is 80% in RSPH1 patients [16], suggesting that RSPH4A mutation causes more severe phenotype than RSPH1 mutation. RS3 alone may control the doublet microtubule arrangement inside the axoneme, and the functions of the triplet RSs seem to complement each other. Given that the spoke head of RS3 is retained in the human PCD patients with RSPH1 mutation [17], the lack of all the triplet spoke heads in Rsph4a KO mice could explain the more severe structural defect of axoneme of respiratory cilia in RSPH4A patients than RSPH1 patients [16, 18].
Frommer et al. demonstrated that RSPH4A is the core radial spoke head protein of the human respiratory cilia by immunofluorescence [20]. Our data are consistent with this finding. We, in contrast, show that the spoke head and the neck/arch are also disrupted in the absence of Rsph4a in the mouse motile cilia. Rsp4/Rsph4a may act as a building block of the neck/arch [13], or the absence of a spoke head could destabilize the neck/arch complex in mouse motile cilia. In previous works, Pigino et al. reported that the spoke heads were missing, whereas the neck/arch was retained in the Chlamydomonas pf1 mutant (Rsp4 mutant) [25]. Frommer et al. reported that ciliary localization of the neck/arch protein RSPH23 was retained in respiratory tissue in human PCD patients with RSPH4A mutations [20]. The stability of the neck/arch may be different among species. Further investigation is necessary on the diversity of RSs and their physiological significance.
Methods
Animals
The mice were bred at the animal facility of the Bio-Resource Laboratory, Tokyo University of Agriculture & Technology, under a 12-h-light, 12-h-dark cycle and were provided with food and water ad libitum. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tokyo University of Agriculture & Technology.
Generation of Rsph4a–/–mice
The design of the targeting vector is described in a previous work (S4 Fig in the paper from Ref. 30; Shinohara et al., 2015). Rsph4a–/– mice and control Rsph4a+/+ (WT) littermates (C57B6J background) were generated by intercrossing Rsph4a+/–heterozygotes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for detection of the WT allele were 5ʹ-CGAAAGCTTCGCAATAAACA-3ʹ (P1) and 5ʹ-CAGGGATACGAGGAACCAAA-3ʹ (P2), and those for detection of the Rsph4a knockout allele were 5ʹ-CTCCATGGGCACTTACTTTC-3ʹ (P3) and P2.
Immunofluorescence
The trachea, ependymal tissue, and oviduct tissue were dissected from mice on postnatal day 21 into phosphate-buffered saline, fixed for 10 minutes at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde, and exposed to methanol at –20°C for 3 minutes. The tissue was then incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature in a solution containing 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.5% TSA blocking reagent (PerkinElmer) before incubation overnight at 4°C with rabbit antibodies to Rsph1 (HPA016816, Sigma, 1/100), Rsph4a (HPA031198, Sigma 1/100), Rsph9 (HPA031703, Sigma, 1/100), Rsph23 (HPA044555, Sigma, 1/100) and mouse antibodies to acetylated tubulin (T6793, Sigma, 1/200) diluted in blocking buffer. The samples were washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and then incubated overnight at 4°C with AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, 1/1000) diluted in blocking buffer. We used seven mice for Rsph4a assay, four mice for Rsph9, four mice for Rsph1, and five mice for Rsph23, respectively (We used the same number of wildtype and Rsph4a KO mice for each assay).
Western blotting
The trachea and testis tissue were dissected from mice on postnatal day 56 into phosphate-buffered saline and we homogenized the tissue in urea/detergent mixture solution. We used Triton-X for the testis and NP40 for the trachea, respectively. After homogenization of tissues, we carried out centrifugation and collected supernatant as a lysate. For western blotting, we used the same antibody (dilution 1/1000) as well as the immunofluorescence. We used two wild type mice and three Rsph4a KO mice for the preparation of the trachea sample. In other hand, we used two wild type mice and two Rsph4a KO mice for the preparation of the testis sample.
Imaging of ciliary motion
The trachea, ependymal tissue, and oviduct tissue were dissected from mice on postnatal day 21 into DMEM HEPES with 10% FBS. Three mice are used for the each observation (Three wild type mice and three Rsph4a KO mice). Tissue is set onto a slide glass with a silicon rubber spacer, and we put a 0.17 mm thick cover glass (Matsunami) on to the spacer before observation. The motion of cilia was captured for 5 s (200 frames/s for trachea cilia, 500 frames/s for ependymal cilia, and 200 frames/s for oviduct cilia) with a high-speed CMOS camera (HAS-500, Detect). The cells were observed by microscopy (Zeiss) equipped with a 100× oil-immersion objective lens for trachea/oviduct cilia and 60× water-immersion objective lens for ependymal cilia. The specimen was illuminated with transmitted light from a halogen lamp. Time-series images were captured at a resolution of 1024 by 992 pixels, with a pixel resolution of 0.082 by 0.082 μm.
Cryoelectron tomography of mouse trachea cilia
For cryo-ET, the mouse trachea cilia samples were prepared according to a protocol in a previous work [30]. Four mice are used for the each observation (Four WT mice and four Rsph4a KO mice). Trachea is dissected from three weeks old mice (P21) in the PBS buffer. We placed the trachea tissue onto the wall of the 1.5 mL tube and rubbed it delicately in Tris buffer containing 5 mM DTT and then collected axonemes by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes. Next, we carried out demembranation by treating the samples with 2% NP40 on ice for 1 hour followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes. The samples were frozen in liquid ethane. Images were taken as described previously using a cryo-EM (Tecnai F20;FEI, Polara at Nagoya Univ.) equipped with a field emission gun, an energy filter, and a 4,092 × 4,092 charge-coupled device (Gatan). The accelerating voltage was set to 300 kV, and the magnification was set to 27,000 ×. Tomographic images in the range of ±55~70 degrees were acquired using Saxton scheme (~ 60 images in total) with 1 e− dose per Å2 per one image, using Xplore3D software (FEI).
Image processing (subtomogram averaging)
Tomogram reconstruction was performed using IMOD [37]. The subtomogram averaging procedures described below were performed using the electron microscope image analysis software program Eos [38], unless otherwise noted. First, low-resolution subtomograms with a pixel size of 50×50×36, which represent 96-nm structural repeat units from a doublet microtubule (with 36 pixels corresponding to 96 nm), were prepared from the tomograms that were shrunk to a quarter pixel size smaller (in each dimension) than the original ones. The low-resolution subtomograms were aligned and averaged using an averaged subtomogram from a sea urchin sperm axoneme as a reference for fitting. Then, high-resolution subtomograms representing a 96 nm repeat with a pixel size of 200×200×144 (with 144 pixels corresponding to 96 nm) were created from the original tomograms and were aligned and averaged using the averaged low-resolution subtomograms as a reference for fitting. Missing wedges were compensated in the averaging processes. A total of 322 particles from 4 tomograms were used for WT mouse cilia, and 491 particles from 4 tomograms were used for Rsph4a KO mouse cilia. For marking the positions of the axonemes or the doublet microtubules for cropping the images, a software program for image processing in structural biology, Bshow, in the Bsoft software package [39] was used. Tomographic slices were visualized with IMOD software (http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/index.html). Surface rendering, as well as denoising through hiding smaller blobs, binning and Gaussian filtering were performed with UCSF Chimera [40].
Supporting information
S1 Fig [tif]
Preparation of cryo-EM sample of mouse trachea cilia.
S2 Fig [left]
Tomographic images of mouse trachea cilia.
S3 Fig [tif]
Western blotting of spoke head and neck/arch protein.
S1 Video [avi]
Motion of trachea cilia in the wildtype mouse.
S2 Video [avi]
Motion of trachea cilia in the KO mouse.
S3 Video [avi]
Motion of ependymal cilia in the wildtype mouse.
S4 Video [avi]
Motion of ependymal cilia in the KO mouse.
S5 Video [avi]
Motion of oviduct cilia in the wildtype mouse.
S6 Video [avi]
Motion of oviduct cilia in the KO mouse.
S7 Video [avi]
Motion of oviduct cilia in the KO mouse.
Zdroje
1. Horani A, Ferkol TW, Dutcher SK, Brody SL. Genetics and biology of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Paediatric respiratory reviews. 2016; 18:18–24. Epub 2015/10/20. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2015.09.001 26476603
2. Zhao L, Yuan S, Cao Y, Kallakuri S, Li Y, Kishimoto N, DiBella L, Sun Z. Reptin/Ruvbl2 is a Lrrc6/Seahorse interactor essential for cilia motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013; 110(31):12697–702. Epub 2013/7/15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300968110 23858445
3. Li Y, Zhao L, Yuan S, Zhang J, Sun Z. Axonemal dynein assembly requires the R2TP complex component Pontin. Development 2017 Dec 15;144(24):4684–4693. Epub 2017 Nov 7. doi: 10.1242/dev.152314 29113992
4. Hartill et al 2018 DNAAF1 links heart laterality with the AAA1 ATPase RUVBL1 and ciliary intraflagellar transport. Hum Mol. Genet. 2018; 27(3):529–545. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx422 29228333
5. Omran etal Ktu/PF13 is required for cytoplasmic pre-assembly of axonemal dyneins. Nature 2008; 456(7222):611–6. doi: 10.1038/nature07471 19052621
6. Loges N. T. etal 2009. Deletions and Point Mutations of LRRC50 Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Due to Dynein Arm Defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009; 85(6):883–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.018 19944400
7. Mitchison etal 2012 Mutations in axonemal dynein assembly factor DNAAF3 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat. Genet. 2012; 44(4):381–9, S1-2. doi: 10.1038/ng.1106 22387996
8. Tarkar etal 2013 DYX1C1 is required for axonemal dynein assembly and ciliary motility. Nat. Genet. 2013; 45(9):995–1003. Epub 2013/7/21. doi: 10.1038/ng.2707 23872636
9. Olblich et al 2002 Mutations in DNAH5 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia and randomization of left–right asymmetry Nat. Genet. 2002; 30(2):143–4. Epub 2002/1/14. doi: 10.1038/ng817 11788826
10. Fassad et al 2018 Mutations in Outer Dynein Arm Heavy Chain DNAH9 Cause Motile Cilia Defects and Situs Inversus. Am J Hum Genet. 2018; 103(6):984–994. Epub 2018/11/21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.016 30471717
11. Smith EF, Yang P. The radial spokes and central apparatus: mechano-chemical transducers that regulate flagellar motility. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 2004;57(1):8–17. doi: 10.1002/cm.10155 14648553
12. Lindemann C. B.,. Lesich K. A. 2010. Flagellar and ciliary beating: the proven and the possible. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 4):519–28. doi: 10.1242/jcs.051326 20145000
13. Oda T., Yanagisawa H. Yagi T., Kikkawa M. Mechanosignaling between central apparatus and radial spokes controls axonemal dynein activity. J. Cell Biol. 2014 Mar 3;204(5):807–19. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201312014 24590175
14. Castleman VH, Romio L, Chodhari R, Hirst RA, de Castro SC, Parker KA, etal Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009; 84(2):197–209. Epub 2009/2/5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.011 19200523
15. Burgoyne T, Lewis A, Dewar A, Luther P, Hogg C, Shoemark A, Dixon M. 2014. Characterizing the ultrastructure of primary ciliary dyskinesia transposition defect using electron tomography. Cytoskeleton 2014; 71(5):294–301. Epub 2014/3/25. doi: 10.1002/cm.21171 24616277
16. Knowles M.R. et al Mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with a unique clinical and ciliary phenotype. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Med. 2014; 189(6):707–17. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201311-2047OC 24568568
17. Lin J, Yin W, Smith MC, Song K, Leigh MW, Zariwala MA, Knowles MR, Ostrowski LE, Nicastro D. 2014. Cryo-electron tomography reveals ciliary defects underlying human RSPH1 primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat. Commun. 2014; 5:5727. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6727 25473808
18. Daniels ML, Leigh MW, Davis SD, Armstrong MC, Carson JL, Hazucha M, Dell SD, Eriksson M, Collins FS, Knowles MR, Zariwala MA. 2013. Founder mutation in RSPH4A identified in patients of hispanic descent with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Human Mutation 2013; 34(10):1352–6. Epub 2013 Aug 6. doi: 10.1002/humu.22371 23798057
19. Yiallouros PK, Kouis P, Pirpa P, Michailidou K, Hadjisavvas A, Loizidou M, Kyriacou K 2017. Clinical disease spectrum in RSPH9 Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia patients: a case series. European Respiratory J. 2017; 50: PA1853; https://doi: 10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.PA1853.
20. Frommer et al 2015. Immunofluorescence Analysis and Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Radial Spoke Defects. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015; 53(4):563–73. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0483OC 25789548
21. Jeanson etal 2015. RSPH3 Mutations Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Central-Complex Defects and a Near Absence of Radial Spokes. Am J. Hum. Genet. 2015;97(1):153–62. Epub 2015 Jun 11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.004 26073779.
22. Abbasi F, Miyata H, Shimada K, Morohoshi A, Nozawa K, Matsumura T, Xu Z, Pratiwi P, Ikawa M. 2018. RSPH6A is required for sperm flagellum formation and male fertility in mice J. Cell Sci. 2018; 131(19). pii: jcs221648. doi: 10.1242/jcs.221648 30185526
23. Pigino G., Ishikawa T. 2012 Axonemal radial spokes. 3D structure, function and assembly. BioArchitecture 2012; 2(2):50–58. doi: 10.4161/bioa.20394 22754630
24. Warner F. D. 1970. New observations on flagellar fine structure. The relationship between matrix structure and the microtubule component of the axoneme. J. Cell Biol. 1970; 47(1):159–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.159 4935335
25. Pigino G, Bui KH, Maheshwari A, Lupetti P, Diener D, Ishikawa T. 2011 Cryoelectron tomography of radial spokes in cilia and flagella J. Cell Biol. 2011; 195(4):673–87. Epub 2011/11/7. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201106125 22065640
26. Lin J, Heuser T, Carbajal-González BI, Song K, Nicastro D 2012. The structural heterogeneity of radial spokes in Cilia and Flagella is Conserved. Cytoskeleton 2012; 69(2):88–100. Epub 2012/1/12. doi: 10.1002/cm.21000 22170736
27. Yamaguchi H., Oda T, Kikkawa M, Takeda H. 2018. Systematic studies of all PIH proteins in zebrafish reveal their distinct roles in axonemal dynein assembly eLife 2018; 7. pii: e36979. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36979 29741156
28. Zhu X., Liu Y, Yang PF. 2017. Radial Spokes-A Snapshot of the Motility Regulation, Assembly, and Evolution of Cilia and Flagella. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017; 9(5). pii: a028126. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028126 27940518
29. Shinohara K., Chen D, Nishida T, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Hamada H. 2015. Absence of radial spokes in mouse node cilia is required for rotational movement but confers ultrastructural instability as a trade-off. Dev. Cell 2015; 35(2):236–46. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.001 26506310
30. Ueno H., Ishikawa T, Bui KH, Gonda K, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi T. Mouse respiratory cilia with the asymmetric axonemal structure on sparsely distributed ciliary cells can generate overall directional flow. Nanomedicine 2012; 8(7):1081–7. Epub 2012/1/31 doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.01.004 22306160
31. Patel-King R. S., Gorbatyuk O, Takebe S, King SM, SM 2004 Flagellar radial spokes contain a Ca2+-stimulated nucleoside diphosphate kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004; 15(8):3891–902. Epub 2004/6/11. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-04-0352 15194815
32. Kohno T, Wakabayashi K, Diener DR, Rosenbaum JL, Kamiya R. Subunit Interactions Within the Chlamydomonas Flagellar Spokehead. Cytoskeleton 2011; 68(4):237–46. Epub 2011 Mar 9. doi: 10.1002/cm.20507 21391306
33. Sivadas P.J. Dienes M, St. Maurice M, Meek WD, Yang P. A flagellar A-kinase anchoring protein with two amphipathic helices forms a structural scaffold in the radial spoke complex. J. Cell Biol. 2012; 199(4):639–51. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201111042 23148234
34. Anderegg L, Im Hof Gut M, Hetzel U, Howerth EW, Leuthard F, Kyöstilä K etal. NME5 frameshift variant in Alaskan Malamutes with primary ciliary dyskinesia. PLoS Genetics 15(9):e1008378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008378 31479451
35. Wooley DM. Studies on the eel sperm flagellum I. The structure of the inner dynein arm complex. J. Cell Sci. 1997; 110 (Pt 1):85–94. 9010787
36. Wooley DM. Studies on the eel sperm flagellum III. Vibratile motility and rotatory bending. Cell Motil.Cytoskeleton 1998; 39(3):246–55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)39:3<246::AID-CM7>3.0.CO;2-2 9519905
37. Kremer JR., Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 1996; 116(1):71–6. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 8742726
38. Yasunaga T, Wakabayashi T. Extensible and object-oriented system Eos supplies a new environment for image analysis of electron micrographs of macromolecules. J. Struct. Biol. 1996; 116(1):155–60. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0025 8742738
39. Heymann JB. Bsoft: Image and molecular processing in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2001; 133(2–3):156–69. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4339 11472087
40. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004; 25(13):1605–12. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084 15264254
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 3
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
- Zkoušku z bariatrické chirurgie nejlépe složil ChatGPT-4. Za ním zůstaly Bing a Bard
- Raději si zajděte na oční! Jak souvisí citlivost zraku s rozvojem demence?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Evidence of defined temporal expression patterns that lead a gram-negative cell out of dormancy
- The Lid/KDM5 histone demethylase complex activates a critical effector of the oocyte-to-zygote transition
- The alarmones (p)ppGpp are part of the heat shock response of Bacillus subtilis
- Modeling cancer genomic data in yeast reveals selection against ATM function during tumorigenesis