Maisonneuve ankle fracture

Česká verze

Authors: J. Bartoníček ¹; P. Fojtík ¹; E. Bunganičová ²; M. Tuček ¹
Authors place of work: Klinika ortopedie, 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice – Vojenská fakultní nemocnice Praha ¹; Radiodiagnostické oddělení, Ústřední vojenská nemocnice – Vojenská fakultní nemocnice Praha ²
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2023, roč. 102, č. 2, s. 48-59.
Category: Souhrnné sdělení
doi: https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.2.48–59

Summary

Maisonneuve fracture (MF) is defined as an ankle fracture-dislocation associated always with a fracture of the proximal quarter of the fibula and rupture of the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments. Other injuries are variable. Recent CT studies have demonstrated that MF is a far more complex injury than initially supposed. Therefore it is necessary to change substantially the current concepts related to this issue. MF is combined in about 80% of cases with a fracture of the posterior malleolus and also with malposition of the distal fibula in the fibular notch. An exact assessment of these injuries requires post-injury CT examination which should be used as a standard in MFs. The main goal of treatment is anatomical reduction of the distal fibula into the fibular notch. In case of avulsion of a larger fragment of the posterior malleolus, it is necessary to perform as the first step its reduction and fixation from the posterolateral approach and thus restore integrity of the notch. Closed reduction of the distal fibula is associated with malposition in up to 50% of cases and therefore open reduction from a short anterolateral approach is preferred. Accuracy of reduction should be always checked by postoperative CT scan.

Keywords:

Maisonneuve fracture – ankle fracture-dislocations – posterior malleolus fractures

Zdroje

1. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Maisonneuve fractures of the ankle: A critical analysis review. JBJS Rew. 2022;10(2):e21.00160. doi:10.2106/JBJS. RVW.21.00160.

2. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kašper Š, et al. Pathoanatomy of Maisonneuve fracture based on radiologic and CT examination. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:497−506. doi:10.1007/s00402- 018-3099-2.

3. Kašper Š, Bartoníček J, Kostlivý K, et al. Maisonneuveho zlomenina. Rozhl Chir. 2020;99:77−85. doi:10.33699/ PIS.2020.99.2.77-85.

4. He JQ, Ma XL, Xin JY, et al. Pathoanatomy and injury mechanism of typical Maisonneuve fracture. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:1644−1651. doi:10.1111/os.12733.

5. Maisonneuve JG. Recherches sur la fracture du peroné. Arch Gen Med. 1840;7:165−187,433−473.

6. Quenu E. Fracture de Maisonneuve (fracture dite par diastase). Bull Soc Chir. (Paris) 1906;32:943−945.

7. Chaput VAH. Les fractures malléolaires du cou-de-pied et les accidents du travail. Paris, Masson 1907.

8. Destot E. Traumatisme du pied et rayons X. Paris, Masson 1911.

9. Tanton J. Fractures en général: Fractures des membres inferiéurs. Paris, JB Bailliere 1916.

10. Ashhurst APC, Bromer RS. Classification and mechanism of fractures of the leg bones involving the ankle. Arch Surg. 1922;4:51−129.

11. Bonnin JG. Injuries to the Ankle. London, Heinemann 1950.

12. Weber BG. Die Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. Bern, Huber 1966.

13. Pankovich AM. Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58−A:337−342.

14. Ammann E. Die Maisonneuve-Fraktur Resultate von 37 behandelten Fällen in der Jahren 1971−1981. Inauguraldissertation. Universität Basel 1981.

15. Heim U. Malleolarfrakturen. Unfallheilkunde 1983;86:248−258.

16. de Souza LJ, Gustilo RB, Meyer TJ. Results of operative treatment of displaced external rotation-abduction fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67-A:1066−1074.

17. Lock TR, Shaffer JJ, Minolli A. Maisonneuve fracture: case report of a misdiagnosis. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:805−807.

18. Savoie FH, Wilkinson MM, Bryan A, et al. Maisonneuve fracture dislocation of the ankle. J Athl Train. 1992;27:268−269.

19. Merrill KD. The Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:218−223.

20. Duchesneau S, Fallat LM. The Maisonneuve fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1995;34:422−428. doi:10.1016/S1067- 2516(09)80016-1.

21. Chan D, Jones D. Irreducible syndesmosis due to an entrapped posterior fragment. Injury 1995;26:569−572. doi:10.1016/0020-1383(95)00087-p.

22. Morris JR, Lee J, Thordarson D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute Maisonneuve fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:259−263. doi:10.1177/ 107110079601700504.

23. Obeid EMH, Amr M, Hirst P, et al. Percutaneous fixation of Maisonneuve and Maisonneuve- type fractures: a minimally invasive approach. Injury 1998;29:619−622. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00149-1.

24. Kirschner P, Brünner M. Die Operation der Maisonneuve-Fraktur. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1999;11:11−18. doi:10.1007/ s00064-006-0078-5.

25. Babis GC, Papagelopoulos PJ, Tsarouchas J, et al. Operative treatment for Maisonneuve fracture of the proximal fibula. Orthopedics 2000;23:687−690. doi:10.3928/0147-7447-20000701-15.

26. Manyi W, Guowei R, Shengsong Y, et al. A sample of Chinese literature MRI diagnosis of interosseous membrane injury in Maisonneuve fractures of the fibula. Injury 2000;31:S-C107−110. doi:10.1016/ s0020-1383(00)80038-8.

27. Sproule JA, Khalid M, O´Sullivan M, et al. Outcome after surgery for Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. Injury 2004;35:791−798. doi:10.1016/S0020- 1383(03)00155-4.

28. Smith MG, Ferguson E, Kurdy NM. Persistent diastasis in a Maisonneuve fracture -interposition of a tibial osteochondral fragment: A case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:225−227. doi:10.1053/j. jfas.2005.02.004.

29. Yoshimura I, Naito M, Kanazawa K, et al. Arthroscopic findings in Maisonneuve fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:3−6. doi:10.1007/s00776-007-1192-4.

30. Hirschmann M, Mauch Ch, Mueller C, et al. Lateral ankle fracture with missed proximal tibiofibular joint instability (Maisonneuve injury). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:952−956. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0597-8.

31. Madhusudhan TR, Dhana SRM, Smith IC. Report of the case of a rare pattern of Maisonneuve fracture. J Foot Ankle Surgery 2008;47:160–162. doi: 10.1053/j. jfas.2007.12.001.

32. Imade SI, Takao M, Miyamoto W, et al. Leg anterior compartment syndrome following ankle arthroscopy after Maisonneuve fracture. Arthroscopy 2009;25:215−218. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.027.

33. Pelton K, Thordarson DB, Barnwell J. Open versus closed treatment of the fibulae in Maisonneuve injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:604−608. doi:10.3113/ FAI.2010.0604.

34. Charopoulos I, Kokoroghiannis C, Kragiannis S, et al. Maisonneuve fracture without deltoid ligament disruption: A rare pattern of injury. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:86e11−86e17. doi:10.1053/j. jfas.2009.10.001.

35. Kalyani BS, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. The Maisonnneuve injury: A comprehensive review. Orthopedics 2010;33:190−197. doi:10.3928/01477447-20100301-04.

36. Stufkens SA, van den Bekerom MPJ, Doornberg JN, et al. Evidence-based treatment of Maisonneuve fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:62−67. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2010.08.017.

37. Dienstknecht T, Horst K, Pape H-Ch. A 72-year-old patient with bilateral Maisonneuve fractures. Clinics and Practice 2012;2(180−181):e72. doi:10.4081/ cp.2012.e72.

38. Hinds R, Tran WH, Lorich DG. Maisonneuve- Hyperplantarflexion variant ankle fracture. Orthopedics 2014;37:E140− E144. doi:10.3928/01477447-20141023- 92.

39. Downey MW, Fleming JJ, Elgamil B, et al. Syndesmosis injury with concomitant deltoid disruption in trimalleolar equivalent ankle fracture: A case. Ann Sports Med Res. 2015;2(1−7):1049.

40. van Wessem KJP, Leenen LPH. A rare type of ankle fracture: Syndesmotic rupture combined with a high fibular fracture without medial injury Injury 2016;47:766−755. doi:10.1016/j.injury. 2016.01.003.

41. Dietrich G, Prod’homme M, Müller J, et al. Conservative management of a specific subtype of Maisonneuve fractures: a report of two cases. AME Case Rep. 2022 Apr 25;6:17. doi:10.21037/acr-21-67.

42. Rofrano M, Herrera H. Arthroscopic findings in Maisonneuve injuries. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol. 2022;87:5−14. https://doi.org/ 10.15417/issn.1852- 7434.2022.87.1.1350.

43. Kolman J. Maisonneuveova zlomenina. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1999;66:41−45.

44. Pérez RL, Costa IG. Atypical pattern of Maisonneuve ´s fracture-dislocation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2009;19:291−295. doi:10.1007/s00590-008-0415-5.

45. Kumar G, Sankar B, Anand S, et al. Superior tibiofibular joint disruption - as a variant of Maisonneuve injury. Foot Ankle Surgery 2004;10:41−43. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1692625.

46. Levy BA, Vogt KJ, Herrera DA, et al. Maisonneuve fracture equivalent with proximal tibiofibular dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006;86-A:1111−1116. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00954.

47. Hirschmann MT, Mauch C, Mueller C, et al. Lateral ankle fracture with missed proximal tibiofibular joint instability (Maisonneuve injury). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:952−956. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0597-8.

48. Hey, Lau BPH, Thambiah J, et al. “Floating fibula” secondary to traumatic dislocation of the ankle joint, ankle syndesmosis, and the proximal tibiofibular joint: A case report. JBJS Case Connect 2013 Oct 23;3(4 Suppl 2):e1071−1075. doi:10.2106/JBJS.CC.M.00028.

49. Bissuel T, Gaillard F, Dagneaux L, et al. Maisonneuve equivalent injury with proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation: Case report and literature review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:404−407. doi:10.1053/j. jfas.2016.10.003.

50. Liu GP, Li JG, Gong X, et al. Maisonneuve injury with no fibula fracture: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 26;9(15):3733−3740. doi:10.12998/wjcc. v9.i15.3733.

(Ostatní položky literatury jsou k dispozici v elektronické verzi RvCH 2)