Surgery of the hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux dinase, Nissen or Toupet?

Česká verze

Authors: M. Kasalický ^1,2; E. Koblihová ¹
Authors place of work: Chirurgická klinika 2. LF Univerzity Karlovy a ÚVN, Praha přednosta: prof. MUDr. M. Ryska, CSc. ¹; Fakulta zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce, Trnavská Univerzita, Trnava dekan: prof. MUDr. J. Slaný, CSc. ²
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2015, roč. 94, č. 12, s. 510-515.
Category: Původní práce

Summary

Introduction:
In 2016 60 years will have elapsed from the first publication by Nissen about his surgical method of 360° fundoplication around distal esophagus and its final effect. Nissen’s fundoplication is currently the most common surgical method for the gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and hiatal hernia (HH) probably. Incidence of HH ranges between 25–50% in the western population. Current prevalence of GER ranges between 4–10% in Europe and 5–7% in North America, but some studies report even 10–20%.

Methods:
From 2010 to 2015, 157 laparoscopic procedures for HH or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were done at the Department of Surgery, the Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Central Military Hospital in Prague. Most of the patients were operated because of symptomatic HH with/without GERD. Only very few patients were operated only for GERD without HH. The group of the patients included 73 men and 84 women with the mean age 53.9 years in the range 20–88 years. 11 patients of the group were operated because of the upside-down stomach syndrome. 109 (69.4%) patients underwent Nissen’s 360° fundoplication (NFP) and 48 (30.6%) patients underwent Toupet’s 270° fundoplication (TFP). The patients were followed after 3 month, 6 month, 12 month and then once a year after the surgery. Symptoms such as heartburn, dysphagia, belching, bloating or recurrence of HH or GERD were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Methods of descriptive statistics and explorative unidirectional analysis were used.

Results:
From 2010 to 2015, 157 laparoscopic procedures were done for HH or GERD. No death occurred in the group of the patients in connection with the surgery. Similar rates of considerable improvement or resolution of the symptoms such as the reflux, heartburn, and epigastric pain were observed after three months from the surgery among patients after NFP or TFP. Postoperative dysphagia resolved in 4–7 weeks in the group after NFP, and in 3–5 weeks in the group after TFP. Disease recurrence was observed in 36 (22.9%) patients in 2 to 5 years after the surgery. Recurrence of only the gastroesophageal reflux without HH was observed in 22 patients (14 after NFP; 8 after TFP), shown by endoscopy or x-ray assessment, with a satisfactory response to PPI medication. Laparoscopic rehiatoplasty and refundoplication according to Nissen were performed in 14 patients with HH recurrence with/without the reflux (8 after NFP; 6 after TFP).

Conclusion:
Laparoscopic antireflux surgery of GERD and HH is safe and is associated with very low perioperative morbidity and minimal morbidity. Both NFP and TFP have a similar effect on restoration of the mechanical gastroesophageal barrier against gastric reflux, with significant effect on resolution of GERD and HH symptoms and with a marked improvement of the patient’s quality of life. As regards morbid obese patients, weight reduction is needed before the surgery. Hiatoplasty done at the same time with the bariatric procedure is recommended in morbid obese patients with HH indicated for the bariatric-metabolic surgery.

Key words:
laparoscopic antirelux procedure – gastroesophageal reflux – hiatal hernia – Nissen – Toupet

Zdroje

1. Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW. The history of hiatal hernia surgery. Annals of Surgery 2015;1:185–93.

2. Bonavia L, Saino G, Lipham JC, et al. LINX reflux management systém in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel affective technology for restoring natural barrier to reflux. Rher Adv Gastroenterol 2013;6:261–8.

3. Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992;51:24–9.

4. Lukáš K. Refluxní choroba jícnu. Praha, Karolinum 2003.

5. Koch OO, Kaidlstorfer A, Antonio SA, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: objektive and subjective results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2012;26:413–22.

6. Fuchs KH, Babic B, Breithaupt W, et al. EAES recommendations for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux dinase. Surg Endsoc 2014;28:1753–73.

7. Mickevicius A, Endzinas Z, Kiudelis LJ, et al. Influence of wrap lenth on the effectiveness of Nissen and Toupet fundoplications: 5-year results of prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 2013;27:986–91.

8. Shan CX, Zhang W, Theng XM, et al. Evidence appraisal in laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:3063–71.

9. Bello B, Zoccali M, Gullo R, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and antireflux surgery – that is the proper preoperative work-up? J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17:14–20.

10. Rickenbacher N, Kötter T, Kochen MM, et al. Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2014;28:143–55.

11. Koch OO, Kaidlstorfer A, Antonio SA, et al. Comparison of results from a randomized trial 1 year after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2383–2390.

12. Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshimo M, at al. Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hilus hernia. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1501–8.

13. Jones R, Simorov A, Lomelin D, et al. Long-term outcomes of radiologic recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh. Surg Endosc 2015;29:425–30.

14. Wilshire CL, Niebisch S, Watson TJ, at al. Dysphagia postfundoplication: more commonly hiatal outflow resistance than poor esophageal body motility. Surgery 2012;152:584–92.

15. Vakil N, Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, at al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900–20.

16. Fein M, Seyfried F. Is there a role for anything other than a Nissen´s operation? J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14 Suppl 1:S67–74.

17. Prassas D, Rolfs TM, Schumacher FJ. Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. A single center experience. Int J Surg 2015;20:149–52.

18. Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshino A, et al. Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1501–1508.

19. Gibson SC, Wong SK, Dixon AC, et al. Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatus hernia: prosthesis is not required for successful outcome. Surg Endosc 2013;27:618–23.

20. Morrow E, Bushyhead D, Wassenaar E, et al. The impact of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in patient with Barrett`s esophagus. Surg Endosc 2014;28:3279–84.

21. Drahoňovský V, Pecák P. Refluxní nemoc jícnu v pohledu laparoskopické chirurgie. Endoskopie 2009;18:6–10.

22. Tekin K, Toydemir T, Yerdel Ma. Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery safe and effective in obese patients? Surg Endosc 2012;26:86–95.

23. Pagé MP, Kastenmeier MG, Frelich M, et al. Medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese: what is the best surgical aproach? Surg Endosc 2014;28:1500–4.

24. Patel AD, Lin E, Lytle NW, at al. Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in the obese patients. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1115–22.