Prehepatic portal hypertension

Česká verze

Authors: Š. Šembera ¹; P. Hůlek ¹; V. Jirkovský ¹; T. Fejfar ¹; A. Krajina ²; P. Ďulíček ³; Miroslav Lojík ² ; J. Raupach ²; V. Chovanec ²; O. Renc ²; Z. Šubrt ⁴; M. Kopáčová ¹
Authors place of work: II. interní gastroenterologická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ¹; Radiologická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ²; IV. interní hematologická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ³; Chirurgická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ⁴
Published in the journal: Gastroent Hepatol 2016; 70(5): 432-437
Category: Hepatologie: původní práce
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amgh2016432

Summary

Introduction:
Prehepatic portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of cirrhosis and solid tumours is most commonly caused by thrombosis of the portal vein (PT). Thrombosis in the portal system manifests as either acute abdominal pain or occurs silently, and varices develop in response to increased portal blood pressure. In 2016, the European Association for the Study of the Liver issued a new clinical practical guideline for the treatment of PT. To treat acute PT, it is advised that anticoagulation therapy is initiated immediately. It is recommended to treat patients with chronic PT by the same way as patients with PH caused by liver cirrhosis.

Aim:
The aim of this study was to describe a group of patients with portal thrombosis at the University Hospital in Hradec Kralove (FNHK) and to compare the therapeutic approaches used with those of the new guidelines.

Method:
Retrospective description of all patients treated for the above-mentioned portal thrombosis in the FNHK that were identified in electronic records.

Results:
The cohort consisted of 52 patients (27 males and 25 females); 44 patients with chronic PT, six with acute PT, and two with subacute PT. All patients with acute or subacute PT had been receiving anticoagulant therapy. Up to that point, five patients had undergone transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), four of whom had local thrombolysis. Patients with chronic PT were treated the same as patients with PH and liver cirrhosis. Up to that point, six spleno-renal shunt procedures, nine splenectomy procedures, seven azygo-portal disconnection procedures, four TIPS procedures, one mesentero-caval shunt procedure, and one splenic embolization procedure had been performed.

Discussion and Conclusion:
Treatment of patients in our study group meets the challenges of the new recommendations. In complicated cases, other therapeutic approaches may be necessary.

Key words:
portal hypertension – thrombosis – portal vein

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.

Submitted:
14. 8. 2016

Accepted:
3. 10. 2016

Zdroje

1. Viallet A, Marleau D, Huet M et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of patients with intrahepatic portal hypertension. Relationship between bleeding varices and the portohepatic gradient. Gastroenterology 1975; 69 (6): 1297–1300.

2. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Vascular diseases of the liver. J Hepatol 2016; 64 (1): 179–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.040.

3. Nery F, Chevret S, Condat B et al. Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study. Hepatology 2015; 61 (2): 660–667. doi: 10.1002/hep.27546.

4. Plessier A, Darwish-Murad S, Hernandez-Guerra M et al. Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology 2010; 51 (1): 210–218. doi: 10.1002/hep.23259.

5. Berzigotti A, García-Criado A, Darnell A et al. Imaging in clinical decision-making for portal vein thrombosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11 (5): 308–316. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.258.

6. Wang L, Liu GJ, Chen YX et al. Sinistral portal hypertension: clinical features and surgical treatment of chronic splenic vein occlusion. Med Princ Pract 2012; 21 (1): 20–23. doi: 10.1159/000329888.

7. Lin N, Liu B, Xu RY et al. Splenectomy with endoscopic variceal ligation is superior to splenectomy with pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12 (45): 7375–7379.

8. D’Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review. Hepatology 1995; 22 (1): 332–354.

9. Rikkers LF, Sorrell WT, Jin G. Which portosystemic shunt is best? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21 (1): 179–196.

10. Jin G, Rikkers LF. Transabdominal esophagogastric devascularization as treatment for variceal hemorrhage. Surgery 1996; 120 (4): 641–647.

11. Fanelli F, Angeloni S, Salvatori FM et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with expanded-polytetrafuoroethylene-covered stents in non-cirrhotic patients with portal cavernoma. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43 (1): 78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.06.001.

12. Senzolo M, Tibbals J, Cholongitas E et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with and without cavernous transformation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23 (6): 767–775.

13. Smalberg JH, Spaander MV, Jie KS et al. Risks and benefits of transcatheter thrombolytic therapy in patients with splanchnic venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100 (6): 1084–1088.

14. Ferro C, Rossi UG, Bovio G et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, mechanical aspiration thrombectomy, and direct thrombolysis in the treatment of acute portal and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30 (5): 1070–1074.

15. Hollingshead M, Burke CT, Mauro MA et al. Transcatheter thrombolytic therapy for acute mesenteric and portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (5): 651–661.

16. Liu FY, Wang MQ, Duan F et al. Interventional therapy for symptomatic-benign portal vein occlusion. Hepatogastroenterology 2010; 57 (104): 1367–1374.

17. Wang MQ, Liu FY, Duan F et al. Acute symptomatic mesenteric venous thrombosis: treatment by catheter-directed thrombolysis with transjugular intrahepatic route. Abdom Imaging 2011; 36 (4): 390–398. doi: 10.1007/s00261-010-9637-1.

18. Turnes J, García-Pagán JC, González M et al. Portal hypertension-related complications after acute portal vein thrombosis: impact of early anticoagulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6 (12): 1412–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.031.

19. Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Scaglione M et al. Prognostic factors in noncirrhotic patients with splanchnic vein thromboses. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (11): 2464–2470.

20. Spaander MC, Hoekstra J, Hansen BE et al. Anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: effect on new thrombotic events and gastrointestinal bleeding. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (3): 452–459.

21. Condat B, Pessione F, Hillaire S et al. Current outcome of portal vein thrombosis in adults: risk and benefit of anticoagulant therapy. Gastroenterology 2001; 120 (2): 490–497.

22. Rajani R, Björnsson E, Bergquist A et al. The epidemiology and clinical features of portal vein thrombosis: a multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32 (9): 1154–1162.

23. Orr DW, Harrison PM, Devlin J et al. Chronic mesenteric venous thrombosis: evaluation and determinants of survival during long-term follow-up. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5 (1): 80–86.