NCK-associated protein 1 like (nckap1l) minor splice variant regulates intrahepatic biliary network morphogenesis
Authors:
Kimia Ghaffari aff001; Lain X. Pierce aff001; Maria Roufaeil aff001; Isabel Gibson aff001; Kevin Tae aff001; Saswat Sahoo aff001; James R. Cantrell aff001; Olov Andersson aff003; Jasmine Lau aff001; Takuya F. Sakaguchi aff001
Authors place of work:
Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
aff001; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
aff002; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
aff003; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
aff004
Published in the journal:
NCK-associated protein 1 like (nckap1l) minor splice variant regulates intrahepatic biliary network morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 17(3): e1009402. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009402
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009402
Summary
Impaired formation of the intrahepatic biliary network leads to cholestatic liver diseases, which are frequently associated with autoimmune disorders. Using a chemical mutagenesis strategy in zebrafish combined with computational network analysis, we screened for novel genes involved in intrahepatic biliary network formation. We positionally cloned a mutation in the nckap1l gene, which encodes a cytoplasmic adaptor protein for the WAVE regulatory complex. The mutation is located in the last exon after the stop codon of the primary splice isoform, only disrupting a previously unannotated minor splice isoform, which indicates that the minor splice isoform is responsible for the intrahepatic biliary network phenotype. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated nckap1l deletion, which disrupts both the primary and minor isoforms, showed the same defects. In the liver of nckap1l mutant larvae, WAVE regulatory complex component proteins are degraded specifically in biliary epithelial cells, which line the intrahepatic biliary network, thus disrupting the actin organization of these cells. We further show that nckap1l genetically interacts with the Cdk5 pathway in biliary epithelial cells. These data together indicate that although nckap1l was previously considered to be a hematopoietic cell lineage-specific protein, its minor splice isoform acts in biliary epithelial cells to regulate intrahepatic biliary network formation.
Keywords:
Actins – Epithelial cells – Genetic networks – Heterozygosity – Larvae – Phenotypes – Zebrafish – Branching morphogenesis
Introduction
The biliary system is responsible for transporting bile from the liver to the digestive tract. The biliary system within the liver, the intrahepatic biliary network, is a highly branched three-dimensional network that is found throughout the liver. Biliary epithelial cells, also called cholangiocytes, are the innermost epithelial cells forming the conduit of this network. Three-dimensional branching anomalies in the intrahepatic biliary network are implicated in many liver diseases, including biliary atresia [1,2]. Biliary atresia is the most common neonatal cholestatic disorder, occurring in approximately 1 of 18,000 live births [3], but the molecular etiology and pathogenesis of this disease are poorly understood. Biliary atresia is not generally thought of as an inherited disease; however, there are some lines of evidence to support the hypothesis that genetic factors contribute to susceptibility to this disease [4–6]. However, the genes and signaling pathways underlying genetic susceptibility to biliary atresia affecting intrahepatic biliary network branching morphogenesis have not been fully investigated. Dysregulation of the innate immune system has been proposed to be involved in the pathogenesis of biliary atresia [7]. However, the question of whether genes important for the innate immune system also affect biliary system formation has just begun to be investigated.
We have previously used a pharmacogenetics approach to show that the Cdk5-Pak1-Limk1-Cofillin kinase cascade regulates branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network and actin dynamics in biliary epithelial cells [8]. However, the extent to which this Cdk5-mediated signaling pathway is linear or branched to regulate actin dynamics is not known.
Actin dynamics is accompanied by rapid site-directed nucleation and polymerization of actin into filaments [9], which is regulated by multiple regulatory factors, including the WASP-family verprolin-homologous protein (WAVE) regulatory complex [10,11]. The WAVE regulatory complex exists as a pentameric heterocomplex that consists of WAVE (WAVE1, WAVE2 or WAVE3), Abi (Abi1 or Abi2), Nap (Nap1 or NCK-associated protein 1-like (Nckap1l)), Sra (Sra1 or Sra2) and HSPC300 proteins [10]. Several upstream factors including the Rac1 GTPase [12–14] and Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) [15] are known to regulate the activity of the WAVE regulatory complex to control actin dynamics. Nckap1l, which is also known as Hematopoietic protein-1 (Hem-1), is considered to be a hematopoietic cell lineage-specific member of the WAVE regulatory complex [16–18], as Nckap1l knockout mice show specific phenotypes in hematopoietic cell deployment and function [16]. However, Nckap1l functions outside of hematopoietic cells are not known.
Alternative splicing is a general regulatory mechanism that produces more than one mRNA isoform from a single gene, allowing the generation of different protein isoforms with diverse functions or localizations from a single gene [19]. Approximately 90–95% of human genes are known to undergo alternative splicing [20]; however, further work is required to uncover the physiological functions of each of those splice isoforms. Some cardiac and neuronal developmental human diseases are associated with errors in alternative splicing mechanisms [19]. However, it is not known whether any alternative splicing is involved in biliary system formation.
In this study, through N-ethylnitrosourea (ENU)-mediated forward genetic screening in zebrafish combined with computational intrahepatic biliary network structural analysis, we have identified a new mutation that genetically interacts with the Cdk5-mediated pathway during branching morphogenesis. We identified that the mutation disrupts a previously unannotated minor splice isoform of the nckap1l gene, and propose that this minor isoform of Nckap1l functions downstream of Cdk5 and Rac1 to regulate branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network.
Results
A forward genetic screen identified the lri35 allele showing a specific phenotype in the intrahepatic biliary network
In the course of ENU-based mutagenesis utilizing Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expression [21,22] in the intrahepatic biliary network and its computational network structure analysis [8], we identified a recessive mutant, lri35, which shows a phenotype similar to that of Cdk5-suppressed larvae [8] (Materials and Methods). The lri35 mutation is viable, and the physical appearance of the majority of lri35 mutant larvae is almost indistinguishable from that of wild-type siblings (Fig 1A and 1B) at 5 days post-fertilization (dpf), while approximately 23% of lri35 mutant larvae (11/47 mutant larvae from three independent crosses) show a delay in swim bladder inflation at this stage. At this stage, the body length of lri35 mutant larvae (average 3.87 mm, s.d. = 0.20, n = 11) is not significantly different from that in wild-type siblings (average 3.96 mm, s.d. = 0.12, n = 14, p = 0.17) at 5 dpf [23], and the size of the liver (Materials and Methods) remains unchanged. However, at this stage, the intrahepatic biliary network in lri35 mutant larvae appears to show fewer branches (Fig 1C and 1D). To quantify the difference in the branching pattern between wild-type and lri35 mutant larvae, we utilized the computational network structure analysis and measured the structural properties of the intrahepatic biliary network (Fig 1E and 1F). We found that network volume (Fig 1G) and length (Fig 1H) in lri35 mutant larvae are reduced while network average thickness is increased (Fig 1I), indicating that the intrahepatic biliary network becomes thicker and shorter in lri35 mutant larvae. In lri35 mutant larvae, the number of nodes (Fig 1J), node-node connections (Fig 1K), and unconnected branches (node-endpoint connections) (Fig 1L) are all reduced while the ratio of connected and unconnected branches is increased (Fig 1M), suggesting that new branches fail to form connections properly in lri35 mutant larvae. The number of Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expressing cells in the liver is reduced in lri35 mutant larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 1O), suggesting that the number of BECs is reduced. Bile canaliculi are the apical membranes of hepatocytes that connect to the intrahepatic biliary network. In lri35 mutant larvae, bile canaliculi, as marked by Abcb11 expression [8], remain relatively unaffected (Fig 1P and 1Q), and the average canalicular length is not changed (Fig 1R). The density of canalicular connection to the intrahepatic biliary network is increased in lri35 mutant larvae (Fig 1S), possibly due to the reduction of the total network length of the intrahepatic biliary network. Overall, these data together indicate that the lri35 mutation impacts branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network in a relatively specific manner.
The lri35 mutation disrupts the minor splice isoform of nckap1l
Until recently, mapping of a causative mutation of ENU mutagenesis-derived mutants was an extremely labor-intensive process. However, the development of next-generation sequencing-based approaches [24–26] has made this process significantly easier. We applied the MMAPPR algorithm [24] to RNA-seq data obtained from lri35 mutant larvae at 5 dpf (Materials and Methods) to map the location of the causative mutation. The lri35 mutation was mapped to chromosome 11 at a region closer to the distal tip (Fig 2A and 2B). Based on the RNA-seq data, we first examined whether there were any SNPs inducing a premature stop within the critical region, but we did not detect any of these mutations. We next screened for differential gene expression levels and differential exon usage of genes within the critical region by using the Cufflinks algorithm [27]. We found that the most down-regulated gene within the critical region (yet bigger than a half-fold change) in lri35 mutant larvae was nckap1l. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the lri35 mutation might disrupt the nckap1l gene. To test this hypothesis, we first injected antisense morpholino (MO) against nckap1l into wild-type Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 eggs (Materials and Methods). We found that at 5 dpf, larvae injected with nckap1l MO did not show any changes in physical appearance, but did show a specific phenotype in the intrahepatic biliary network (S1 Fig) consistent with the hypothesis that nckap1l is mutated in lri35 mutant larvae. We next induced an indel mutation to the nckap1l gene in wild-type using CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing technology [28,29]. We injected the assembled CRISPR/Cas9 complex targeting nckap1 into fertilized zebrafish eggs (Materials and Methods) and subsequently established a deletion allele, nckap1llri90, that deletes 7 bp from the first exon and induces a premature stop at the position of 3tyrosine (S2A–S2C Fig). In homozygous nckap1llri90 mutant larvae at 5 dpf, physical appearance is not affected (S2D and S2E Fig), but the intrahepatic biliary network shows lower three-dimensional-branching complexity (S2F–S2I Fig). Computed network structural sub-parameters of nckap1llri90 mutant larvae are significantly different from those of WT control larvae and are similar to those of lri35 mutant larvae (S2J–S2R Fig). nckap1llri90 mutant larvae show a similar phenotype (S2 Fig) to that of lri35 mutant larvae, suggesting that these two mutations disrupt the same gene. At 5 dpf, nckap1llri90 mutant larvae also show functional defects in their biliary system, as indicated by reduced PED6 trafficking to the gallbladder [8,30] (S2S Fig). The nckap1llri90 mutation is viable, and homozygous nckap1llri90 adult fish show no overt difference in physical appearance. However, the Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 positive network of the homozygous nckap1llri90 adult liver appears to be thinner and less dense (S2U Fig) than that of wild-type fish, suggesting that the mutation continues to affect the intrahepatic biliary network in the adult stage. To test the hypothesis that the lri35 mutation disrupts the nckap1l gene, we attempted a genetic complementation approach by crossing heterozygous lri35 and homozygous nckap1llri90 mutant fish. We found that approximately 50% (20/43) of the larvae from this cross show a phenotype indistinguishable from either that of lri35 or nckap1llri90 mutant larvae (S3 Fig), indicating that the lri35 allele failed to complement the nckap1llri90 allele and that these two mutations disrupt the same gene. However, to our surprise, we did not find any mutation when we sequenced the nckap1l cDNA isolated from lri35 mutant larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 2C). We also sequenced most of the annotated exon/intron boundaries of the nckap1l gene in lri35 mutant larvae but did not find any mutations. By chance during these intensive sequence attempts, we found a previously unannotated splice isoform of nckap1l, which we refer to as nckap1l ß. This alternative splice variant skips all exons after exon 16 and uses an alternative stop codon in the last exon (Fig 2C). Thus, the encoded Nckap1l ß protein is smaller than Nckap1l (Fig 2D). We isolated the nckap1l ß cDNA from lri35 mutant larvae and found that one adenine nucleotide is inserted into the ß-specific coding region (Figs 2C, 2E and S4). This insertion changes the last 13 amino acids of the Nckap1l ß protein (Fig 2F). We measured relative nckap1l α and ß gene expression in lri35 mutant larvae at 5 dpf by quantitative RT-PCR and found that nckap1l ß expression is slightly reduced in lri35 mutant larvae whereas nckap1l α expression remains unchanged (S5A and S5B Fig). Since the entire nckap1l ß gene sequence is part of the ORF and UTR of the nckap1l α gene, we were not able to design the nckap1l ß-specific RNA probe for in situ hybridization. Instead, we compared nckap1l α-specific probe to nckap1l α and ß shared probe, and found that the nckap1l α and ß shared probe stained the liver more strongly than the nckap1l α-specific probe, suggesting that nckap1l ß might be expressed more than nckap1l α in the liver at 5 dpf (S5C and S5D Fig). Based on these data, we propose that the lri35 mutation is an adenine nucleotide insertion that specifically disrupts the ß isoform of the nckap1l gene, indicating that this minor splice isoform of nckap1l is important for intrahepatic biliary network branching morphogenesis.
Nckap1l is expressed in hepatic biliary epithelial cells
In mice, Nckap1l is predominantly expressed in immune cells [16]; however, its expression within biliary epithelial cells has not been studied. We generated an antibody against zebrafish Nckap1l (Materials and Methods) and examined Nckap1l expression in the zebrafish larval liver at 5 dpf. We found that Nckap1l is predominantly expressed in vascular endothelial cells (Figs 3A and S6). We also observed small puncta of Nckap1l expression in Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14-positive biliary epithelial cells (Fig 3B). Expression in both endothelial and biliary epithelial cells is missing in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae at 5 dpf (Figs 3C and S7), suggesting that the Nckap1l protein is degraded in the mutant larvae.
WAVE regulatory complex component proteins are degraded in biliary epithelial cells in the liver of nckap1llri35 mutant larvae
In other systems, depletion of Nckap1l leads to the destruction of other WAVE regulatory complex (WRC) component proteins (Fig 3D), including WAVE and Abi1, without influencing their level of gene expression [16,18,31–33]. We found that WAVE1 is expressed predominantly in biliary epithelial cells in the liver of wild-type larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 3E), and this WAVE1 expression is decreased in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae (Fig 3F). Moreover, in the wild-type liver at 5 dpf, consistent with a previous report that Abi1 undergoes nucleocytoplasmic shuttling [34], Abi1 is localized to the nucleus of some hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells (Fig 3G). In nckap1llri35 mutant larvae, Abi1 expression in biliary epithelial cells is specifically missing, while its expression in hepatocytes remains unchanged (Fig 3H). Similarly, we found that HSPC300 is expressed in the liver, including in biliary epithelial cells, of wild-type larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 3I), and this HSPC300 expression is decreased in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae (Fig 3J). Three-dimensional projected confocal images of the liver in wild-type larvae indicated that Nckap1l and HSPC300 colocalize in biliary epithelial cells near the projection tips of biliary epithelial cells (Fig 3K) at 5 dpf, suggesting that the WRC forms at this site. These data together indicate that WRC forms in biliary epithelia cells in wild-type larvae, and WRC component proteins are degraded in the liver of nckap1llri35 mutant larvae.
Consistent with the observation that WAVE regulatory complex proteins are degraded in biliary epithelial cells, the actin organization of nckap1llri35 mutant larvae changes and becomes concentrated around the lumen of biliary epithelial cells (Fig 3L and 3M).
Overexpression of nckap1l ß specifically impacts the intrahepatic biliary network
As mutations in the nckap1l ß gene were found to impact intrahepatic biliary network formation, we next examined whether overexpression of nckap1l ß would also influence intrahepatic network formation. We synthesized the nckap1l ß mRNA in vitro (Materials and Methods) and injected it into Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 eggs. At 5 dpf, we did not observe any difference in physical appearance in nckap1l ß mRNA-injected larvae (Fig 4A and 4B). We found that all injected larvae appeared to show differences in intrahepatic biliary network branching pattern (Fig 4C–4F). However, likely due to the degradation of injected RNA by 5 dpf, there was high variability of the intrahepatic biliary network structural properties in larvae injected with nckap1l ß mRNA at 5 dpf (Fig 4G–4L), and only the percentage of 5-or-more-way branches among the entire network was increased significantly (Fig 4L), suggesting that the network in nckap1l ß mRNA-injected larvae contains nodes with more branches. These data indicate that overexpression of nckap1l ß can induce a relatively specific phenotype in the intrahepatic biliary network.
Overexpression of nckap1l ß rescued nckap1llri35 mutant phenotypes
We next injected nckap1l ß mRNA into eggs obtained from an nckap1llri35 heterozygous fish intercross, and at 5 dpf, we genotyped homozygous nckap1llri35 larvae injected with the nckap1l ß mRNA and examined intrahepatic biliary network formation. We found that network structural sub-parameters observed in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae, including the total network length (Fig 4M), the numbers of nodes (Fig 4N) and connections (Fig 4O), are rescued by injecting nckap1l ß mRNA. These data indicate that supplying nckap1l ß mRNA can rescue, at least in part, intrahepatic biliary phenotypes in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae, further confirming that the nckap1l ß gene is responsible for this mutation.
nckap1l genetically interacts with Cdk5 and Rac1 during intrahepatic biliary network branching morphogenesis
We identified the nckap1llri35 mutant as having a similar phenotype to that of Cdk5-suppressed larvae. In the mammalian nervous system, Cdk5 is known to directly phosphorylate WAVE1 to regulate actin cytoskeletal organization [15]. Thus, we hypothesized that nckap1l and cdk5 might act in the same signaling pathway to regulate intrahepatic biliary network branching morphogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we examined the genetic interaction between nckap1l and cdk5 in biliary epithelial cells. In the liver of Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae, the endogenous inhibitor of Cdk5 is expressed specifically in biliary epithelial cells [35]. Consistent with a previous report that the phenotype of Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae is very mild [35], we found that the branching pattern of the intrahepatic biliary network in Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae is not significantly changed from that of wild-type larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 5A, 5C and 5E). As the nckap1llri90 mutation is recessive, we did not observe any phenotype in heterozygous nckap1llri90 mutant animals. However interetingly, when we crossed heterozygous nckap1llri90 mutant fish to homozygous Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 fish, we found that approximately 50% of their offspring (n = 23/45 tested) showed a significantly more severe phenotype in the intrahepatic biliary network compared to that of Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae at 5 dpf (Fig 5B, 5D and 5F). This result strongly suggests that nckap1l and cdk5 genetically interact in biliary epithelial cells. Subsequent genotyping confirmed that those 23 larvae showing an enhanced phenotype are all heterozygous nckap1llri90 larvae expressing Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109, confirming that losing one copy of nckap1l in the Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 background synergistically generates the phenotype via the dosage-sensitive genetic interaction. Computational network structure analysis confirmed that network volume, network length, and segment number are significantly reduced in heterozygous nckap1llri90; Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae compared to those in Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 larvae (Fig 5G–5J). These data together indicate that nckap1l genetically interacts with the Cdk5 pathway in biliary epithelial cells to regulate intrahepatic biliary network remodeling. Finally, since the WRC is known to acts downstream of Rac1 [12–14,36], we tested whether the nckap1l mutation genetically interacts with the Rac1 pathway. Consistent with a previous report [37], 50 ug/ml Rac1 inhibitor treatment from 3 to 5 dpf did not induce any physical appearance change, but we found that the intrahepatic biliary network branching pattern was severely altered (Fig 6B and 6F). When we lowered the Rac1 inhibitor concentration to 10 ug/ml, it no longer affected intrahepatic biliary network branching patterns in wild-type larvae (Fig 6D and 6H). However, when we treated larvae obtained from nckap1llri90 heterozygous outcross to wild-type fish from 3 to 5 dpf with the same low dose 10 ug/ml Rac1 inhibitor, approximately 50% (24/51) larvae showed a significantly more severe phenotype in the intrahepatic biliary network (Fig 6C, 6G, and 6I–6L), and we identified that these affected larvae are all heterozygous nckap1llri90 larvae. These data together show that losing one copy of nckap1l sensitized the effects of the low dose Rac1 inhibitor, suggesting that nckap1l acts downstream of the Rac1 pathway.
In this study, through a forward genetic approach, we have identified Nckap1l as a novel factor regulating branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network. Nckap1l is a component of the WAVE regulatory complex (WRC), which is known to act downstream of Cdk5 and Rac1 to regulate actin dynamics. Consistently, we show that the nckap1l mutation genetically interacts with the Cdk5 (Fig 5) and Rac1 (Fig 6) pathways in biliary epithelial cells, suggesting that we have identified a new signaling branch that acts downstream of Cdk5 and Rac1 to orchestrate branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network (Fig 6M).
We initially focused on the nckap1llri35 mutant phenotype even before identifying the responsible gene because the biliary phenotype calculated by the computational network structure analysis is similar to those of Cdk5-suppressed larvae [8]. It is intriguing that Nckap1l is a component of the WRC, which is directly phosphorylated by Cdk5 in other systems, and we have identified that the nckap1llri35 mutation actually interacts genetically with the Cdk5 pathway (Fig 5). These data suggest that precise quantification of mutant phenotypes with our computational analysis could predict the signaling pathway in which the mutated gene lies.
In biliary epithelial cells, Nckap1l exhibits a punctate localization near the plasma membrane (Fig 3B). The projected confocal images indicated that Nckap1l colocalizes with HSPC300 near the tip of the projecting intrahepatic biliary network (Fig 3K), indicating that the WRC forms near the leading edge of protruding BECs to regulate branching morphogenesis, which is similar to the previous observation that the WRC is known to localize to the leading edges of lamellipodia in the migrating cell [18]. We previously showed the tight correlation between the actin organization in BECs and the intrahepatic biliary network branching pattern [8], in which the consolidated actin organization in BECs correlates with the paucity of intrahepatic biliary network branching. Consistent with this previous observation, we found that actin dynamics in BECs are consolidated in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae (Fig 3L and 3M), suggesting that changes in BEC actin dynamics might influence the branching pattern of the intrahepatic biliary network.
In this study, we have identified a previously unannotated splice isoform of nckap1l in zebrafish, and the nckap1llri35 mutation specifically affects this minor splice isoform (Fig 2); this study added a new gene to the list that previously shown to regulate intrahepatic biliary network formation in zebrafish [38–48]. As the nckap1llri35 mutation does not affect the coding sequence of the major isoform (α) of nckap1l, we assume that the minor splice isoform (ß) is responsible for the intrahepatic biliary network phenotypes observed in nckap1llri35 mutant larvae. Consistently, injecting the RNA encoding the minor nckap1l isoform at least partially rescued the nckap1llri35 mutant phenotype (Fig 4M–4O). Although specific binding domains of Nckap1l to other WRC proteins are not precisely determined yet, it will be important to identify binding partners that specifically bind to the Nckap1l ß specific C-terminus domain (Fig 2D), which is mutated by the lri35 mutation. We detected strong Nckap1l expression in vascular endothelial cells in the liver (Figs 3A and S6), we did not observe overt differences in the vasculature of nckap1llri35 mutant larvae (S8 Fig). However, in nckap1llri90 mutant larvae at 6 dpf, although the penetrance is low, we observed disrupted intersegmental vessels (S8 Fig), suggesting that Nckap1 α might be predominantly required for vascular angiogenesis. It is not yet known whether a similar minor splice isoform of NCKAP1L exists in humans; however, the last exon of human NCKAP1L is large. It would be intriguing to clone the short splice form of NCKAP1L in rodents and humans to understand the clinical relevance of this finding. Indeed sequence data derived from patients with biliary atresia and other cholangiopathies should be reexamined focusing on mutations in the last exon of human NCKAP1L after the conventional stop codon, as our data potentially suggest that the genomic region currently recognized as the 3’ UTR could encode a previously unannotated minor protein isoform.
Nckap1l knockout mice exhibited a 25-fold increase in the number of circulating neutrophils [16]; however, in zebrafish larvae, the number of neutrophils remains constant in nckap1llri90 mutant larvae at 5 dpf (S9 Fig), suggesting that nckap1l is not required for the initial differentiation of neutrophils in zebrafish. We did not observe neutrophil accumulation in the liver of nckap1llri90 mutant larvae at 5 dpf, suggesting that liver inflammation might not happen at this stage. As we found that the nckap1llri90 mutation genetically interacts with Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109 (Fig 5), in which the Cdk5 inhibitor is specifically expressed by biliary epithelial cells within the liver, we assume that nckap1l functions cell-autonomously in biliary epithelial cells to regulate actin remodeling for branching morphogenesis. This view is consistent with our observation that Nckap1l is expressed in biliary epithelial cells (Fig 3B). However, our data do not exclude the possibility that the biliary phenotype seen in nckap1l mutant larvae might be secondary to a phenotype in innate immune cells. We also observed that the nckap1llri90 mutation genetically interacts with the Rac1 pathway (Fig 6). Since the WRC is known to act downstream of Rac1 [36], we assume that Rac1 regulates the intrahepatic biliary network branching morphogenesis at least in part through the WRC containing Nckap1l. These data suggest that Nckap1l might be working as a signaling hub integrating the Cdk5 and Rac1 pathways to regulate proper branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network (Fig 6M).
In conclusion, we have identified a previously unannotated splice isoform of nckap1l that is necessary for the branching morphogenesis of the intrahepatic biliary network and actin dynamics in biliary epithelial cells. The fact that minor splice isoform of the gene, whose major isoform is known to regulate innate immune cell differentiation and migration, plays pivotal roles in biliary system formation further implies that the correlation between cholangiopathy and inflammation might be due to genes required for both processes.
Materials and methods
Zebrafish husbandry and transgenic lines
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae were obtained from natural crosses of the wild-type AB/TL strain or heterozygous mutant fish. The following transgenic and mutant lines were used: WT(AB/TL), nckap1llri35 (originally named JW-1.10), nckap1llri90, Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14, Tg(tp1:cdkal1)kl109, Tg(lyz:EGFP)nz117 [49], Tg(kdrl:GFP)s843 [50], Tg(kdrl:RFP_CAAX)y171 [51], and Tg(fabp10:RFP-CAAX)lri2 [8]. Animal husbandry methods for this specific study including the use of 12-month-old adult fish were approved by the Cleveland Clinic’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
N-ethylnitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis and screening procedure
The standard three-generation screen with analysis of mutant phenotypes in F3 larvae was conducted as previously described [52]. In brief, 20 adult male AB/TL zebrafish were exposed to 3 mM ENU at weekly intervals four times. The mutagenized males were crossed to Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 fish. Total 228 F2 families representing 332.32 genomes were screened for altered Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expression in the liver at 5 dpf. The phenotype was confirmed and quantified by the custom algorithm [8] as described below. We only collected mutants that showed no overt physical appearance phenotype at 5 dpf. We have recovered 24 alleles, including nckap1llri35, showing phenotypes in the intrahepatic biliary network from this screen. The recovered nckap1llri35 allele was backcrossed to the original AB/TL strain for 9 generations before starting detailed phenotype analyses.
Computational network structure analysis
Confocal z-stack data of Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expression were obtained using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. The z-step used on the images was 0.25 μm. We used Imaris 8.2 software (Bitplane) to digitally crop the image such that only EGFP expression from the intrahepatic biliary network remained for further analysis. The Liver Analysis Program 5.3 [8] was used for all computational network structure analyses. For all analyses, we confirmed the proper skeletal conversion by overlaying the original confocal image with the converted skeletal image as previously described [8].
Sample preparation, RNA-seq and bioinformatics
Total RNA from 20 wild-type siblings and 20 nckap1llri35 mutant larvae was collected at 5 dpf using the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Cat. 74104) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA for next-generation sequencing was synthesized by using the TruSeq standard total RNA kit (Illumina, 20020598) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Using an Illumina HighSeq 2500, a total of 11.5 and 10.5 millions of paired-end 50-bp reads were obtained from wild-type and mutant cDNA, respectively. Raw reads were aligned to the zebrafish genome (GRCz10) using TopHat [27]. The lri35 mutation was mapped to chromosome 11 by MMAPPR [24]. The NGS and analyzed data are available in the GEO repository at the NCBI (GSE153386).
Nckap1l antibody production
A polyclonal antibody against zebrafish Nckap1l, ab805, was produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific according to their established production protocol. In brief, zebrafish Nckap1l peptides, “RINHIKKCFSDPKRRP”, were synthesized, and NZW SPF rabbits were immunized. Serum was collected at day 90 and used at a 1:1 dilution in blocking buffer for immunohistochemistry. This antibody is predicted to recognize both α and ß isoforms of Nckap1l.
Immunohistochemistry and other staining
For immunohistochemistry, zebrafish larvae were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PEM (0.1 M Pipes, 2 mM EGTA, and 1.0 mM MgSO4), and the skin and yolk were removed prior to staining. All antibody staining was performed on fixed larvae in 10% Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher, 8511) and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-WAVE1 at a 1:200 dilution (Novusbio, NB100-92239), anti-Abi1 at a 1:200 dilution (Thermo Fisher, PA5 35337), anti-Spgp (Abcb11) at a 1:200 dilution (Kamiya Biomedical Company, PC-064), anti-HSPC300 at a 1:200 dilution (Santa Cruz, sc-390459), anti-beta-tubulin (Abcam, Cat. 6046) at a 1:5,000 dilution, and anti-Nckap1l (ab805) at a 1:1 dilution. The secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG ALEXA FLUOR 568 (Invitrogen, A11036) was used at a 1:200 dilution. The following staining treatments were also used: ALEXA FLUOR 647 Phalloidin at a 1:10 dilution (Thermo Fisher, A22287; 300 units) and DAPI at a 1:2000 dilution (Life Technologies, D1306; 10 mg).
Generation of the nckap1llri90 allele
To create the lri90 mutation, the following crRNA sequence was used: 5’-CUCCGCCAGUUUCAGCUGGUGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCU-3’, which was injected into wild-type fertilized eggs. The CRISPR/Cas9 complex was assembled according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 3 μL of 100 μM crRNA, 3 μL of 100 μM Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 tracrRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, 209702895), and 94 μL of nuclease free water were mixed. The mixture was then heated to 95°C. Two microliters of the mixture, 0.5 μL of Alt-R S.P. Cas9 Nuclease V3 (Integrated DNA Technologies, 209702894), 2 μL of phenol red, and 5 μL water were mixed and heated to 37°C before injection. We injected this solution into fertilized zebrafish eggs, and we subsequently established the nckap1llri90 allele which disrupts both nckap1l α and ß isoforms.
Liver size measurement
The liver size was measured based on the images of Tg(fabp10:RFP-CAAX)lri2 expression at 5 dpf utilizing the ImageJ software.
nckap1l morpholino injection
nckap1l splice blocking morpholino (5’-AGCGGCTCCGCTCACCTTCTTGATG-3’) was designed and injected as previously described [38]. This morpholino is predicted to block proper splicing of both nckap1l α and ß isoforms.
Genotyping of the lri35 and lri90 alleles
The following primers were used to genotype the lri35 allele: forward primer that we named 17, 5’-GTCAGGATATGCTGGAGATGTG-3’; reverse primer that we named JW-genotyping_AR1, 5’-TGATCTGGATTCTGAAGAAGCCACTGA-3’. The lri35 mutation induces an MboII site in the PCR product amplified by these primers. The following primers were used to genotype the lri90 allele: forward primer that we named pam-F1, 5’-GATTAGAGAAAGCTGAGAGCGGAAGTG-3’; reverse primer that we named pam-R1, 5’-ACTGAGGACTTCAGAAGCGGCTCCGCT-3’. The lri90 mutation eliminates the PvuII site in the PCR product amplified by these primers.
Cloning of nckap1l isoforms and RNA synthesis for injection
nckap1l α was sub-cloned from a PCR product amplified from the cDNA of 5 dpf wild-type zebrafish larvae using the following primers: forward primer, 5’- CACACTCACCATGGCCTAC-3’; reverse primer, 5’-GACGTGTGATCTCCCTGATAAC-3’. nckap1l ß was PCR amplified using the following primers: forward primer, 5’-CACACTCACCATGGCCTAC-3’; reverse primer, 5’-CCTCACACACAGCGTAATGA-3’. The nckap1l isoforms were gel purified and sub-cloned using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit Dual Promoter (Life Technologies, 450640). nckap1l ß was sub-cloned into PCS2+. The nckap1l ß pCS2+ plasmids was digested with NotI-HF (New England BioLabs, R3189; 500 units), and the mRNA was synthesized using the mMessage SP6 kit (Invitrogen, AM1340; 25 reactions). nckap1l ß synthesized RNA was injected into wild-type eggs at 0–1 hpf at amounts of 160 pg per egg.
PED6-based biliary system functional assay
PED6 treatment and measurement were performed as previously described [8]. In brief, zebrafish larvae obtained from heterozygous nckap1llri90 mutant fish cross were soaked in PED6-containing media from 4 to 5 dpf, scored PED6 staining in the gallbladder as previously described [8], and genotyped.
Real-time qPCR
Real-Time qPCR was performed as previously described [38]. We used following primers: nckap1l α (5’- GTCCTCTGTCCTACTCCAGCTC-3’ and 5’-TCTCTGTATGCGTTTCTGAGGA-3’); nckap1l ß (5’-TCCCGCTCGTCTGCTCACACTTCAGCC-3’ and 5’-GATTGATGTAAGCAGTGGTGTTG-3’); control b2m (5’-GCCTTCACCCCAGAGAAAGG-3’ and 5’-GCGGTTGGGATTTACATGTTG-3’). The ΔΔCt method using b2m as a reference was used for relative quantification.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed as previously described [38]. nckap1l α specific and nckap1l α and ß probes were synthesized using the PCR products amplified with the following primers as a template: α specific (5’-GGTGTTTGTGCAGATGGCGGGCTAC -3’ and 5’- CACCGATTTAGGTGACACTATAGgtagagtgtggtgatggtctgcgcgc-3’) and α and ß (5’-ATTGTGAATTTTGACCTAGACCAAGA-3’ and 5’-CACCGATTTAGGTGACACTATAGctgttcccgttggacagctcatacg-3’).
Pharmacological treatments
Rac1 inhibitor (EMD Biosciences, Product #553502) was treated as previously described [37].
Adult liver tissue processing and imaging
12-month-old adult fish were dissected to examine altered Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expression in the liver. The liver lobe fixed in 2% FA in PEM was embedded in 2% GeneMate LowMelt Agarose (Cat. No. E-3126-25) in PBS. The agarose block was sliced at a thickness of 250 μm with Leica VT1000S vibratome. The slices were scanned on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. Tg(Tp1-MmHbb:EGFP)um14 expression in the liver was scanned in a z-stack image, and the projected images were generated by Bitplane Imaris software.
Statistics
For pairwise analysis, Student’s t-test was used to compare means assuming unequal variance. To compare three or more means, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test was used.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [a]
morpholino (MO) injection changes the branching pattern of the intrahepatic biliary network.
S2 Fig [a]
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout induces biliary phenotypes similar to those in mutant larvae.
S3 Fig [a]
The mutant failed to complement the mutant, indicating that these two mutations are affecting the same gene.
S4 Fig [wt]
Sanger sequencing confirms a one-nucleotide insertion in the gene.
S5 Fig [a]
expression in wild-type larvae at 5 dpf.
S6 Fig [red]
Nckap1l is expressed in endothelial cells in the liver.
S7 Fig [tif]
Western blotting of WAVE regulatory complex (WRC) proteins.
S8 Fig [a]
Formation of intersegmental vessels in mutant larvae.
S9 Fig [a]
The number of neutrophils is unchanged in mutant larvae at 5 dpf.
Zdroje
1. Lee HC, Yeung CY, Chang PY, Sheu JC, Wang NL. Dilatation of the biliary tree in children: sonographic diagnosis and its clinical significance. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2000;19(3):177–82; quiz 83–4. Epub 2000/03/10. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.3.177 10709833.
2. Mack CL, Sokol RJ. Unraveling the pathogenesis and etiology of biliary atresia. Pediatric research. 2005;57(5 Pt 2):87R–94R. Epub 2005/04/09. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000159569.57354.47 15817506.
3. Sokol RJ, Mack C, Narkewicz MR, Karrer FM. Pathogenesis and outcome of biliary atresia: current concepts. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2003;37(1):4–21. Epub 2003/06/27. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200307000-00003 12827000.
4. Garcia-Barcelo MM, Yeung MY, Miao XP, Tang CS, Cheng G, So MT, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus for biliary atresia on 10q24.2. Human molecular genetics. 2010;19(14):2917–25. Epub 2010/05/13. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq196 20460270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2893814.
5. Tsai EA, Grochowski CM, Loomes KM, Bessho K, Hakonarson H, Bezerra JA, et al. Replication of a GWAS signal in a Caucasian population implicates ADD3 in susceptibility to biliary atresia. Human genetics. 2014;133(2):235–43. Epub 2013/10/10. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1368-2 24104524; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3901047.
6. Tang V, Cofer ZC, Cui S, Sapp V, Loomes KM, Matthews RP. Loss of a Candidate Biliary Atresia Susceptibility Gene, add3a, Causes Biliary Developmental Defects in Zebrafish. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2016;63(5):524–30. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001375 27526058; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5074882.
7. Hartley JL, Davenport M, Kelly DA. Biliary atresia. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1704–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60946-6 19914515.
8. Dimri M, Bilogan C, Pierce LX, Naegele G, Vasanji A, Gibson I, et al. Three-dimensional structural analysis reveals a Cdk5-mediated kinase cascade regulating hepatic biliary network branching in zebrafish. Development. 2017;144(14):2595–605. doi: 10.1242/dev.147397 28720653; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5536925.
9. Goley ED, Welch MD. The ARP2/3 complex: an actin nucleator comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(10):713–26. doi: 10.1038/nrm2026 16990851.
10. Takenawa T, Suetsugu S. The WASP-WAVE protein network: connecting the membrane to the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(1):37–48. doi: 10.1038/nrm2069 17183359.
11. Kurisu S, Takenawa T. The WASP and WAVE family proteins. Genome Biol. 2009;10(6):226. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-226 19589182; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2718491.
12. Kunda P, Craig G, Dominguez V, Baum B. Abi, Sra1, and Kette control the stability and localization of SCAR/WAVE to regulate the formation of actin-based protrusions. Curr Biol. 2003;13(21):1867–75. Epub 2003/11/01. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.005 14588242.
13. Soto MC, Qadota H, Kasuya K, Inoue M, Tsuboi D, Mello CC, et al. The GEX-2 and GEX-3 proteins are required for tissue morphogenesis and cell migrations in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2002;16(5):620–32. Epub 2002/03/06. doi: 10.1101/gad.955702 11877381; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC155352.
14. Ibarra N, Blagg SL, Vazquez F, Insall RH. Nap1 regulates Dictyostelium cell motility and adhesion through SCAR-dependent and -independent pathways. Curr Biol. 2006;16(7):717–22. Epub 2006/04/04. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.068 16581519.
15. Kim Y, Sung JY, Ceglia I, Lee KW, Ahn JH, Halford JM, et al. Phosphorylation of WAVE1 regulates actin polymerization and dendritic spine morphology. Nature. 2006;442(7104):814–7. doi: 10.1038/nature04976 WOS:000239792700046. 16862120
16. Park H, Staehling-Hampton K, Appleby MW, Brunkow ME, Habib T, Zhang Y, et al. A point mutation in the murine Hem1 gene reveals an essential role for Hematopoietic protein 1 in lymphopoiesis and innate immunity. J Exp Med. 2008;205(12):2899–913. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080340 19015308; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2585840.
17. Sparks EE, Huppert KA, Brown MA, Washington MK, Huppert SS. Notch signaling regulates formation of the three-dimensional architecture of intrahepatic bile ducts in mice. Hepatology. 2010;51(4):1391–400. doi: 10.1002/hep.23431 20069650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2995854.
18. Weiner OD, Rentel MC, Ott A, Brown GE, Jedrychowski M, Yaffe MB, et al. Hem-1 complexes are essential for Rac activation, actin polymerization, and myosin regulation during neutrophil chemotaxis. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(2):e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040038 16417406; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1334198.
19. Baralle FE, Giudice J. Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(7):437–51. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 28488700.
20. Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008;456(7221):470–6. doi: 10.1038/nature07509 18978772; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2593745.
21. Lorent K, Moore JC, Siekmann AF, Lawson N, Pack M. Reiterative Use of the Notch Signal During Zebrafish Intrahepatic Biliary Development. Dev Dynam. 2010;239(3):855–64. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22220 ISI:000275633100012. 20108354
22. Parsons MJ, Pisharath H, Yusuff S, Moore JC, Siekmann AF, Lawson N, et al. Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech Dev. 2009;126(10):898–912. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.07.002 19595765; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3640481.
23. Parichy DM, Elizondo MR, Mills MG, Gordon TN, Engeszer RE. Normal table of postembryonic zebrafish development: staging by externally visible anatomy of the living fish. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(12):2975–3015. Epub 2009/11/06. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22113 19891001; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3030279.
24. Hill JT, Demarest BL, Bisgrove BW, Gorsi B, Su YC, Yost HJ. MMAPPR: mutation mapping analysis pipeline for pooled RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2013;23(4):687–97. doi: 10.1101/gr.146936.112 23299975; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3613585.
25. Miller AC, Obholzer ND, Shah AN, Megason SG, Moens CB. RNA-seq-based mapping and candidate identification of mutations from forward genetic screens. Genome Res. 2013;23(4):679–86. doi: 10.1101/gr.147322.112 23299976; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3613584.
26. Leshchiner I, Alexa K, Kelsey P, Adzhubei I, Austin-Tse CA, Cooney JD, et al. Mutation mapping and identification by whole-genome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22(8):1541–8. doi: 10.1101/gr.135541.111 22555591; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3409267.
27. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–78. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 22383036; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3334321.
28. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819–23. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143 23287718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3795411.
29. Hoshijima K, Jurynec MJ, Klatt Shaw D, Jacobi AM, Behlke MA, Grunwald DJ. Highly Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Based Methods for Generating Deletion Mutations and F0 Embryos that Lack Gene Function in Zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2019;51(5):645–57 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.10.004 31708433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6891219.
30. Farber SA, Pack M, Ho SY, Johnson ID, Wagner DS, Dosch R, et al. Genetic analysis of digestive physiology using fluorescent phospholipid reporters. Science. 2001;292(5520):1385–8. Epub 2001/05/19. doi: 10.1126/science.1060418 11359013.
31. Blagg SL, Stewart M, Sambles C, Insall RH. PIR121 regulates pseudopod dynamics and SCAR activity in Dictyostelium. Curr Biol. 2003;13(17):1480–7. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00580-3 WOS:000185171300017. 12956949
32. Zhu ZR, Bhat KM. The Hem protein mediates neuronal migration by inhibiting WAVE degradation and functions opposite of Abelson tyrosine kinase. Dev Biol. 2011;357(2):283–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.025 WOS:000294834400001. 21726548
33. Schenck A, Qurashi A, Carrera P, Bardoni B, Diebold C, Schejter E, et al. WAVE/SCAR, a multifunctional complex coordinating different aspects of neuronal connectivity. Dev Biol. 2004;274(2):260–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.009 15385157.
34. Echarri A, Lai MJ, Robinson MR, Pendergast AM. Abl interactor 1 (Abi-1) wave-binding and SNARE domains regulate its nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, lamellipodium localization, and wave-1 levels. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(11):4979–93. Epub 2004/05/15. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4979-4993.2004 15143189; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC416433.
35. Liu KC, Leuckx G, Sakano D, Seymour PA, Mattsson CL, Rautio L, et al. Inhibition of Cdk5 Promotes beta-Cell Differentiation From Ductal Progenitors. Diabetes. 2018;67(1):58–70. doi: 10.2337/db16-1587 28986398; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6463766.
36. Park H, Chan MM, Iritani BM. Hem-1: putting the "WAVE" into actin polymerization during an immune response. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(24):4923–32. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.018 20969869; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3363972.
37. Nussbaum JM, Liu LJ, Hasan SA, Schaub M, McClendon A, Stainier DY, et al. Homeostatic generation of reactive oxygen species protects the zebrafish liver from steatosis. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1326–38. Epub 2013/06/08. doi: 10.1002/hep.26551 23744565; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3791216.
38. Schaub M, Nussbaum J, Verkade H, Ober EA, Stainier DY, Sakaguchi TF. Mutation of zebrafish Snapc4 is associated with loss of the intrahepatic biliary network. Dev Biol. 2012;363(1):128–37. Epub 2012/01/10. S0012-1606(11)01445-X [pii] 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.025. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.025 22222761.
39. Villasenor A, Gauvrit S, Collins MM, Maischein HM, Stainier DYR. Hhex regulates the specification and growth of the hepatopancreatic ductal system. Dev Biol 2020;458(2):228–36. Epub 2019/11/08. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.10.021 31697936
40. Thestrup MI, Caviglia S, Cayuso J, Heyne RLS, Ahmad R, Hofmeister W, et al. A morphogenetic EphB/EphrinB code controls hepatopancreatic duct formation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5220. Epub 2019/11/21. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13149-7 31745086; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6864101.
41. Parsons MJ, Pisharath H, Yusuff S, Moore JC, Siekmann AF, Lawson N, et al. Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech Develop. 2009;126(10):898–912. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.07.002 ISI:000271237000013. 19595765
42. Matthews RP, Lorent K, Russo P, Pack M. The zebrafish onecut gene hnf-6 functions in an evolutionarily conserved genetic pathway that regulates vertebrate biliary development. Dev Biol. 2004;274(2):245–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.016 15385156.
43. Matthews RP, Eauclaire SF, Mugnier M, Lorent K, Cui S, Ross MM, et al. DNA hypomethylation causes bile duct defects in zebrafish and is a distinguishing feature of infantile biliary atresia. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):905–14. Epub 2011/02/15. doi: 10.1002/hep.24106 21319190; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3075951.
44. Gao C, Huang W, Gao Y, Lo LJ, Luo L, Huang H, et al. Zebrafish hhex-null mutant develops an intrahepatic intestinal tube due to de-repression of cdx1b and pdx1. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11(6):448–62. Epub 2018/11/15. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjy068 30428031; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6604603.
45. Manfroid I, Ghaye A, Naye F, Detry N, Palm S, Pan L, et al. Zebrafish sox9b is crucial for hepatopancreatic duct development and pancreatic endocrine cell regeneration. Dev Biol. 2012;366(2):268–78. Epub 2012/04/28. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.002 22537488; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3364407.
46. Delous M, Yin C, Shin D, Ninov N, Debrito Carten J, Pan L, et al. Sox9b is a key regulator of pancreaticobiliary ductal system development. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(6):e1002754. Epub 2012/06/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002754 22719264; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3375260.
47. Dong PD, Munson CA, Norton W, Crosnier C, Pan X, Gong Z, et al. Fgf10 regulates hepatopancreatic ductal system patterning and differentiation. Nat Genet. 2007;39(3):397–402. Epub 2007/01/30. doi: 10.1038/ng1961 17259985.
48. Ober EA, Lemaigre FP. Development of the liver: Insights into organ and tissue morphogenesis. J Hepatol. 2018;68(5):1049–62. Epub 2018/01/18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.005 29339113.
49. Hall C, Flores MV, Storm T, Crosier K, Crosier P. The zebrafish lysozyme C promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in transgenic fish. BMC Dev Biol. 2007;7:42. Epub 2007/05/05. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-7-42 17477879; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1877083.
50. Jin SW, Beis D, Mitchell T, Chen JN, Stainier DY. Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish. Development. 2005;132(23):5199–209. Epub 2005/10/28. doi: 10.1242/dev.02087 16251212.
51. Fujita M, Cha YR, Pham VN, Sakurai A, Roman BL, Gutkind JS, et al. Assembly and patterning of the vascular network of the vertebrate hindbrain. Development. 2011;138(9):1705–15. Epub 2011/03/25. doi: 10.1242/dev.058776 21429985. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3074447.
52. Driever W, Solnica-Krezel L, Schier AF, Neuhauss SC, Malicki J, Stemple DL, et al. A genetic screen for mutations affecting embryogenesis in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:37–46. 9007227.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2021 Číslo 3
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
- Zkoušku z bariatrické chirurgie nejlépe složil ChatGPT-4. Za ním zůstaly Bing a Bard
- Raději si zajděte na oční! Jak souvisí citlivost zraku s rozvojem demence?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- DNA polymerase theta suppresses mitotic crossing over
- IKAROS is required for the measured response of NOTCH target genes upon external NOTCH signaling
- activin-2 is required for regeneration of polarity on the planarian anterior-posterior axis
- The etiology of Down syndrome: Maternal MCM9 polymorphisms increase risk of reduced recombination and nondisjunction of chromosome 21 during meiosis I within oocyte