#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Not too long, not too short: Goldilocks principle of eye size


Authors: Rachel W. Kuchtey aff001
Authors place of work: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America aff001;  Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America aff002
Published in the journal: Not too long, not too short: Goldilocks principle of eye size. PLoS Genet 16(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008914
Category: Perspective
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008914

For most of the world, normal vision and visual acuity are central to our lives and livelihoods. Abnormal vision is often equated with conditions such as cataracts or retinal degeneration, but increasingly recognized contributors to abnormal vision are serious disturbances in visual acuity caused by uncorrected refractive error. In 2017, the Vision Loss Expert Group projected that uncorrected refractive error will become a major cause of global vision impairment and blindness by 2020 [1]. Although refractive error such as nearsightedness (myopia) and farsightedness (hyperopia) is usually correctable with eyeglasses, high myopia and high hyperopia can result in significant vision loss, and even irreversible blindness, due to complications such as macular degeneration and glaucoma. Myopic macular degeneration gives rise to similar outcomes as does age-related macular degeneration, with a notable difference—the former affects patients of much younger age. At the other end of the refractive spectrum, high hyperopia commonly leads to angle closure glaucoma. Furthermore, extremely high hyperopia associated with nanophthalmos—a small eye caused by developmental abnormalities—almost always leads to angle closure glaucoma, for which surgical correction is challenging and often associated with severe complications [2]. Understanding the pathogenesis of refractive error is greatly needed to develop effective treatments.

High myopia or hyperopia is commonly caused by lengthening or shortening of axial length (AL) of the eye, respectively. If AL is too long, the sclera (the white outer layer of the eye) becomes stretched and thinned, predisposing to retinal detachment and degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium. Conversely, if AL is too short, internal eye structures are crowded, and the sclera becomes thickened, predisposing to angle closure glaucoma and choroidal effusion.

Recent studies in PLOS Genetics provide new insight into the genes and gene interactions, that contribute to abnormalities in axial length and refraction, and, furthermore, represent an intersection between common and rare genetic disease. On the common side of the spectrum, myopia and hyperopia have been the subject of several genome wide association studies (GWAS). TMEM98, which encodes a widely expressed single transmembrane protein of unknown function [3,4], is one of several loci associated with high myopia in GWAS, but a definitive and mechanistic role for TMEM98 in axial length has not been apparent from GWAS. On the rare side of the spectrum, however, deleterious coding alterations in TMEM98 co-segregate with autosomal dominant nanophthalmos in large multigenerational families [5,6]. Intriguingly, nanophthalmos is the phenotypic opposite of high myopia, a paradox that is underscored by a report of 3 variants in TMEM98 associated with high myopia in Chinese patients [7].

Nanophthalmos can be caused by genes other than TMEM98. In fact, the first nanophthalmos locus (NNO1) was mapped in 1998 [8], and last year, using the same family, Garnai and colleagues reported in PLOS Genetics that the underlying cause was a mutation in MYRF that leads to a C-terminal truncation [9]. MYRF encodes a transcription factor that regulates the production of myelin, especially for the optic nerve. But MYRF is also a gene in which different alleles lead to different phenotypes, including a syndromic condition with diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac defects, and urogenital abnormalities [10]. To better understand the role of MYRF and MYRF mutations in ocular development and disease, Garnai and colleagues added to their PLOS Genetics manuscript the investigation of a tissue-specific loss-of-function MYRF allele in mice, targeted to the developing retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [9]. Interestingly, these animals exhibited degeneration of the retina and RPE, but did not exhibit an alteration in axial length [9]. Now, mouse eyes are very different from human eyes, so absence of a shortened axial length in Myrf mutant mice is perhaps not so surprising [11]. On the contrary, Myrf mutant mice faithfully recapitulate the retinal abnormalities, which is perhaps not surprising since other genes identified in Mendelian nanophthalmos cases, such as CRB1 and BEST1, have profound roles in the retina and RPE [12,13]. Although it has been postulated that the RPE, which is anatomically interposed between retina and sclera, plays a critical role in relaying signals from neural retina to sclera as an end target for regulation of axial length, the precise mechanism remains largely elusive and begs further investigation [14].

Cross and colleagues did just that in a study published in April 2020’s issue of PLOS Genetics [15]. The authors provide yet another surprising, but not unexpected finding, that mice lacking Tmem98 have greatly enlarged eyes with long axial length. This study was built upon their previous investigation, which found that when two known missense mutations of TMEM98 in human autosomal dominant nanophthalmos were engineered into mice, they did not have nanophthalmos, but instead developed retinal pathology [16]. They further confirmed the strong expression of TMEM98 in RPE, consistent with previous reports [9]. To understand the mechanism of action, the investigators in the current study produced mice deficient for Tmem98 in the RPE to avoid perinatal lethality caused by global knockout of the gene. Those mice developed retinal and RPE abnormalities as expected. More strikingly, they exhibited greatly enlarged eye size with compressed choroid and thin sclera, which could be detected as early as embryonic day 17.5 and persisted to adult life. The extremely thin sclera in the Tmem98 mutant mice is likely the root cause of the extremely enlarged eye, yet electron microscopy failed to show obvious collagen fibril abnormalities, which is counterintuitive. It may even contradict the findings from surgical specimens of a nanophthalmos patient, as shown by Yamani et al. [17]. The full-thickness nature of the sclerectomy specimens of the human eye allowed detailed views of all three layers of sclera, in which the innermost layer- the lamina fusca, which is adjacent to the choroid and RPE- had the most pronounced collagen fibril abnormalities, highlighting a possible role of RPE in determining the thickened sclera phenotype in nanophthalmos. The lack of obvious abnormalities of collagen fibrils in the Tmem98 conditional knockout mice could be due to the intrinsically thin nature of mouse sclera, perhaps highlighting the necessity of large animal models with similar eye size and anatomy to human eyes.

To understand the molecular mechanism of action, the investigators performed an unbiased experiment and discovered MYRF as an interacting partner to TMEM98. This was an extremely important finding, but again came as no surprise for two main reasons: first, mutations of MYRF are known to cause autosomal dominant nanophthalmos in human patients [9]; second, Garnai and colleagues had previously discovered interaction of the same two proteins, prompting them to propose a new pathway for eye size regulation [9]. In addition, the interaction between those two proteins was already shown in oligodendrocytes in mice [18]. Because MYRF is a membrane-bound transcription factor activated by self-cleavage of the N terminus and nuclear translocalization of the C terminal portion, there likely exists a negative feedback loop between MYRF and TMEM98 (Fig 1). In fact, the study from Cross and colleagues bolsters that idea: TMEM98 inhibits the autoproteolytic cleavage of the N terminus of MYRF. When TMEM98 is lacking in the RPE, MYRF is ectopically activated and translocated to nuclei to activate transcription of downstream genes. It would be very interesting to know if Myrf mutant mice could rescue the phenotypes observed in Tmem98 mutant mice. These experiments would shed more light on the regulation of eye size and could ultimately suggest therapeutic approaches to make the eye size just right–not too long, not too short.

Fig. 1. TMEM98 and MYRF in eye size regulation.
TMEM98 and MYRF in eye size regulation.
A. Schematic drawing of the human eye. The eye size is an important factor in determining proper focus of images on the retina, and its regulation is complex. If the axial length is too short, hyperopic refractive error may occur. An extreme example is nanophthalmos (A, top). The opposite is myopic refractive error, which commonly results from long axial length (A, bottom). B. Close up view of posterior pole of normal size human eye (A, middle). Multiple layers of retina are condensed as a single layer and depicted in yellow. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is in green, choroid in brown and sclera in blue. C. Close up view of molecular interaction between TMEM98 and MYRF in RPE cells. Mutations in MYRF cause autosomal dominant nanophthalmos in human patients, but conditional knock out of Myrf in mice does not show short axial length phenotype. Similar phenomena have been demonstrated in TMEM98. Furthermore, RPE specific conditional knock out of Tmem98 in mice results in extremely enlarged eye size with compressed choroid and thin sclera. One of the interacting partners of TMEM98 is MYRF which is a membrane bound transcription factor. MYRF is inactive due to the failure of self-cleavage when bound by TMEM98. When TMEM98 is absent in the RPE, the N-terminal portion of MYRF (N-MYRF) is released without inhibition of TMEM98 and subsequently translocalized to the nucleus where it induces transcription of target genes.

Zdroje

1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221–34. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5 29032195

2. Carricondo PC, Andrade T, Prasov L, Ayres BM, Moroi SE. Nanophthalmos: A Review of the Clinical Spectrum and Genetics. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:2735465. doi: 10.1155/2018/2735465 29862063

3. Kiefer AK, Tung JY, Do CB, Hinds DA, Mountain JL, Francke U, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis Points to Roles for Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, the Visual Cycle, and Neuronal Development in Myopia. G Gibson, editor. PLoS Genet. 2013 Feb 28;9(2):e1003299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003299 23468642

4. The CREAM Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium, Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):834–48. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0127-7 29808027

5. Awadalla MS, Burdon KP, Souzeau E, Landers J, Hewitt AW, Sharma S, et al. Mutation in TMEM98 in a large white kindred with autosomal dominant nanophthalmos linked to 17p12-q12. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;132(8):970–7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.946 24852644

6. Khorram D, Choi M, Roos BR, Stone EM, Kopel T, Allen R, et al. Novel TMEM98 mutations in pedigrees with autosomal dominant nanophthalmos. Mol Vis. 2015;21:1017–23. 26392740

7. Sun W, Zhang Q. Does the association between TMEM98 and nanophthalmos require further confirmation? JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;133(3):358–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4915 25429522

8. Othman MI, Sullivan SA, Skuta GL, Cockrell DA, Stringham HM, Downs CA, et al. Autosomal dominant nanophthalmos (NNO1) with high hyperopia and angle-closure glaucoma maps to chromosome 11. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Nov;63(5):1411–8. doi: 10.1086/302113 9792868

9. Garnai SJ, Brinkmeier ML, Emery B, Aleman TS, Pyle LC, Veleva-Rotse B, et al. Variants in myelin regulatory factor (MYRF) cause autosomal dominant and syndromic nanophthalmos in humans and retinal degeneration in mice. MG Anderson, editor. PLOS Genet. 2019 May 2;15(5):e1008130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008130 31048900

10. Rossetti LZ, Glinton K, Yuan B, Liu P, Pillai N, Mizerik E, et al. Review of the phenotypic spectrum associated with haploinsufficiency of MYRF. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179(7):1376–82. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61182 31069960

11. Sundin OH. The mouse’s eye and Mfrp: not quite human. Ophthalmic Genet. 2005 Dec;26(4):153–5. doi: 10.1080/13816810500374359 16352474

12. Zenteno JC, Buentello-Volante B, Ayala-Ramirez R, Villanueva-Mendoza C. Homozygosity mapping identifies the Crumbs homologue 1 (Crb1) gene as responsible for a recessive syndrome of retinitis pigmentosa and nanophthalmos. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 May;155A(5):1001–6. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33862 21484995

13. Yardley J, Leroy BP, Hart-Holden N, Lafaut BA, Loeys B, Messiaen LM, et al. Mutations of VMD2 splicing regulators cause nanophthalmos and autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy (ADVIRC). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;45(10):3683–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0550 15452077

14. Rymer J, Wildsoet CF. The role of the retinal pigment epithelium in eye growth regulation and myopia: a review. Vis Neurosci. 2005 Jun;22(3):251–61. doi: 10.1017/S0952523805223015 16079001

15. Cross SH, Mckie L, Hurd TW, Riley S, Wills J, Barnard AR, et al. The nanophthalmos protein TMEM98 inhibits MYRF self-cleavage and is required for eye size specification. PLoS Genet. 2020 Apr 1;16(4):e1008583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008583 32236127

16. Cross SH, Mckie L, Keighren M, West K, Thaung C, Davey T, et al. Missense Mutations in the Human Nanophthalmos Gene TMEM98 Cause Retinal Defects in the Mouse. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2019 Jul 2;60(8):2875.

17. Yamani A, Wood I, Sugino I, Wanner M, Zarbin MA. Abnormal collagen fibrils in nanophthalmos: a clinical and histologic study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;127(1):106–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00302-x 9933017

18. Huang H, Teng P, Du J, Meng J, Hu X, Tang T, et al. Interactive Repression of MYRF Self-Cleavage and Activity in Oligodendrocyte Differentiation by TMEM98 Protein. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2018 14;38(46):9829–39.


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2020 Číslo 7
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Svět praktické medicíny 3/2024 (znalostní test z časopisu)
nový kurz

Kardiologické projevy hypereozinofilií
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Petr Němec, Ph.D.

Střevní příprava před kolonoskopií
Autoři: MUDr. Klára Kmochová, Ph.D.

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
Autoři: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Závislosti moderní doby – digitální závislosti a hypnotika
Autoři: MUDr. Vladimír Kmoch

Všechny kurzy
Kurzy Podcasty Doporučená témata Časopisy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#