Retrotransposon Silencing by piRNAs: Ping-Pong Players Mark Their Sub-Cellular Boundaries

Summary

article has not abstract

Germ cells of many animals exhibit characteristic cytoplasmic structures—termed germ granules or nuage—which are ribonucleoprotein (RNP) amorphous aggregates without limiting membranes and are often closely associated with nuclei or mitochondria [1]. In several model animals, such as Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Xenopus, studies on germ granules have mainly focused on their asymmetric partitioning to prospective germ cells in early embryogenesis, leading to a supposition that the RNP structures contribute to the establishment of the germline. In mammals, in contrast, germ granules become discernible at later stages of germ cell differentiation, i.e., in spermatogenesis and oogenesis, and are not asymmetrically segregated. Thus, their possible function seems different from those in early embryos of other species. Despite the difference, germ granules of diverse animals, including mammals, not only share morphological similarities, but their molecular compositions are also conserved [2], suggesting a common and essential function in the germline, which however remained unanswered for many years.

Recently, almost a century after the first description of germ granules [1], this longstanding enigma, or at least a part of it, is finally being unraveled. Accumulating evidence now points to a close association of germ granules with retrotransposon control and, especially, the piwi-small RNA pathway. Germ cells of many animals, from worms to mammals, are equipped with specific members of the argonaute subfamily, the piwi proteins, which associate with piwi-interacting small RNAs (piRNAs), and this small RNA pathway is critical for retrotransposon silencing in the germline (and gonadal soma in Drosophila) [3]. In mice, Mili/Piwil2 and Miwi2/Piwil4, two mouse piwi members, are central to the feed-forward or ping-pong production of piRNAs from retrotransposon and other cellular transcripts in the male germline, and their loss-of-function mutations lead to deregulation of Line-1 and IAP retrotransposons, resulting in male sterility with meiotic spermatocyte defects [4]–[6].

In this issue of PLoS Genetics, Aravin and colleagues in the Bortvin and Hannon groups report the remarkable finding that both piwi proteins exhibit distinct subcellular compartmentalization in fetal prospermatogonia/gonocytes, wherein retrotransposon silencing is established during male germline development [7]. MILI localizes to inter-mitochondrial cement (also called inter-mitochondrial material/bar/cloud etc.), a form of germ granules commonly observed in divergent animals, and MIWI2 accumulates at processing bodies (P-bodies), an mRNP assembly widely conserved in eukaryotes from yeast to humans and whose presumed function is general RNA degradation/translational control, including those mediated by miRNAs and siRNAs [8]. These distinct MILI and MIWI2 granules contain tudor domain containing proteins TDRD1 and TDRD9, respectively, which also operate in the piwi pathway to suppress retrotransposons [9]–[12]. The discrete localization of MILI-TDRD1 to germ granules and MIWI2-TDRD9 to processing bodies indicates that the two RNP complexes, which are often found in close proximity, represent functionally separate assemblies of the small RNA machineries that likely co-operate and interdependently function in piRNA biogenesis and retrotransposon silencing.

Aravin et al. add another key player, Maelstrom (MAEL), in the piwi-small RNA pathway. MAEL has a HMG box and a domain homologous to DnaQ-H 3′-5′ exonuclease, and is conserved from protists to mammals [13]–[16]. The authors show that the MAEL protein in mice is specifically colocalized with MIWI2-TDRD9 granules in the cytoplasm of prospermatogonia, in addition to their accumulation in the nucleus. The MIWI2-TDRD9-MAEL complex was shown to correspond to a subpopulation of processing bodies as identified by P-body markers DCP1a, DDX6, XRN1, and GW182. They named this subpopulation of processing bodies containing MIWI2-TDRD9-MAEL “piP-bodies” and inter-mitochondrial cement localized with MILI-TDRD1 “pi-bodies”. The latter term was recently also proposed for Drosophila nuage enriched with piwi pathway components, retroelement transcripts, and processing body components [17]. In mice, the MAEL localization is dependent on the Mili function, but not vice versa, similarly to the requirement of Mili for MIWI2 and TDRD9 localizations [10],[18], and then Mael regulates the assembly of MIWI2 and TDRD9 onto piP-bodies. Thus, MAEL acts downstream of MILI and upstream of MIWI2-TDRD9 with respect to the subcellular compartmentalization in fetal prospermatogonia in mice.

Previously, the authors reported that Mael gene–targeted mice are male-sterile and show a strong activation of Line-1 retrotransposon in postnatal testes [16]. Now, they extend their analysis of Mael mutants to fetal prospermatogonia and uncover a striking finding that piRNA production is severely impaired at embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) with transposon-derived piRNAs being virtually absent in Mael mutants, but the defect largely recovers at postnatal day 2 (P2), while secondary piRNAs, which preferentially load onto MIWI2, are under-represented by several-fold. Together with the precise colocalization of MAEL with MIWI2 at piP-bodies and their epistatic relationship, the authors argue that the Mael mutation affects the MIWI2 pathway in the ping-pong production of piRNAs, resulting in a delayed accumulation of piRNAs with decreased secondary piRNA signatures. In Mili, Miwi2, and Tdrd1 mutants, the biogenesis and/or sequence profile of piRNAs are also significantly impacted, and de novo DNA methylation of retrotransposon loci, which usually takes place in fetal prospermatogonia in the male germline, is severely impaired [4]–[6],[10],[12],[19]. However, in Mael mutants, DNA methylation at Line-1 retrotransposon loci examined is only moderately decreased in prospermatogonia at E16.5, which recovers by E18.5 and then the difference is not detectable at neonatal P2. The authors correlate this unexpected lag and recovery of de novo DNA methylation with delayed nuclear accumulation of MIWI2 in Mael mutant prospermatogonia and suggest that MAEL “facilitates” MIWI2-dependent steps of the piRNA pathway. These observations provide unprecedented insights that the coordinated and ordered operations of the piwi pathway components at around embryonic day E16.5—when or just after fetal prospermatogonia become arrested at the G1/G0 stage and DNA methylation reprogramming commences—are essential in the establishment of retrotransposon silencing in the male germline in mice. In these processes, Maelstrom is a critical modulator that acts in the MIWI2 pathway. Meanwhile, one key question that arises from this study is, given the recovery of DNA methylation in the Mael mutant, what then triggers the later retrotransposon activation in postnatal spermatogenesis as was reported previously [16]? One possibility might be that histone modifications are affected independent of DNA methylation at the locus examined. Alternatively, Mael might have an additional function separate from other piwi pathway components so far identified. A recent study in Drosophila actually showed that Mael regulates Bag-of-marbles via repression of miR-7 and ensures proper differentiation of spermatocytes [20]. It remains to be addressed whether this novel function of Mael in the miRNA pathway is retained across species, in addition to its conserved role in the piwi machinery.

The study by Aravin et al. reveals that germ granules, namely pi-bodies, and a germline analogue of processing bodies, piP-bodies, are cytoplasmic compartments where piwi pathway components assemble. The next questions are how and why these components are differently sorted-out into distinct subcellular domains, and what is the underlying molecular mechanism wherein the two RNP complexes cooperate in the piRNA biogenesis, which is intimately linked to retrotransposon silencing at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. It is important to note that current experiments performed with fixed tissue sections give us a static image of potentially dynamic interactions between the two RNP complexes. Development of suitable cell culture systems that recapitulate the piRNA pathway and the use of live-cell imaging techniques will help explore this further. It is also currently unclear whether these RNP assemblies are functional prerequisites for the piwi-small RNA pathway operation, or such cytoplasmic aggregations are consequences and by-products of normal cellular metabolism. Indeed, in somatic cells, microscopically visible processing bodies are not required for proper functioning of the small RNA pathway [21]. Another evident but untouched issue is that “pi-bodies” in prospermatogonia correspond to “inter-mitochondrial cement” located in the midst of mitochondrial clusters (Figure 1). At present, we do not have any experimental clues to discuss whether there would possibly be any correlation between the piwi pathway and mitochondria. The physiological function(s) of germ granules is one of the classic but still enigmatic problems in developmental and cell biology and remains to be fully determined. Further characterization of germline RNPs and the piwi-small RNA pathway associated there would uncover an intriguing molecular mechanism(s) that is present but still hidden within the germline.