Identifying and solving drug-related problems in terms of the community pharmacist
Authors:
Lucia Masaryková; Magdaléna Fulmeková; Ľubica Lehocká; Tomáš Fazekaš
Authors place of work:
Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave
Published in the journal:
Čes. slov. Farm., 2014; 63, 32-39
Category:
Původní práce
Summary
The issue of drug related problems (DRPs) has been known and dealt with in many studies for a long time. It is primarily due to the fact that drug-related problems have the potential to increase patients’ morbidity and mortality in particular. The issue of identifying and solving drug-related problems in the area of pharmacotherapy by community pharmacists in the Slovak Republic, unlike in other European countries such as the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, is still at the beginning and gradually developing. The aim of the survey was to obtain information from pharmacy practice concerning the current state and possible solutions of potential risks of medicines in the form of drug-related problems of patients from community pharmacist’s point of view as well as to find out the role and status of community pharmacists in identifying and solving drug-related problems. A questionnaire survey using a sample of 237 respondents, its statistical processing and evaluation revealed the drug-related problems frequency met at their patients (the most common types of DRPs, their causes and subsequent intervention), as well as the opinions of community pharmacists on their current possibilities of (legislative, material, personnel, time) solving and risk-rating therapies for patients.
Keywords:
pharmacotherapy, drug related problems, interventions, community pharmacy, questionnaire survey
Zdroje
1. Laššanová M., Petrová M., Laššan Š., Hudec R. Nežiaduce účinky liekov, riziko farmakoterapie. Via pract. 2008; 5(2), 87–89.
2. Práznovcová L. Lékové záznamy pacienta. 1. vyd. Praha: Panax 2000. http://www.pace.cz/go/odborne_publikace (15. 11. 2012)
3. Matejka P. Konzultačná činnosť v lekárni – úvod do problematiky. FarmiNEWS 2010; 2(2), 52–53.
4. Matejka P. Pharmaceutical care ako systematické liekové poradenstvo. FarmiNEWS 2011; 3(3), 2–3.
5. Masotti P., McColl M. A., Green M. Adverse events experienced by homecare patients: A scoping review of the literature. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2010; 22(2), 115–125.
6. Kriška M. a kol. Riziko liekov v medicínskej praxi. 1. vydanie Bratislava: Slovak Academic Press 2000.
7. Cannon K. T., Choi M. M., Zuniga M. A. Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients receiving home health care: A restrospective data analysis. Am. J. Geriat. Pharmacother. 2006; 4(2), 134–143.
8. Khdour M. R., Jarab A. S., Adas H. O., Samaro E. Z., Mukattash T. L., Hallak H. O. Identification of drug- related problems: A prospective study in two general hospital. Current Clin. Pharmacology 2012; 7(4), 276–281.
9. Arques-Armoiry E., Cabelguenne D., Stamm C., Janoly-Dumenil A., Grosset-Grange I., Vantard N., Maire P., Charpiat B. Most frequent drug-related events detected by pharmacists during prescription analysis in a University Hospital. Revue de Medecine Interne 2010; 31(12), 804–811.
10. Kwint H. F., Faber A., Gussekloo J., Bouvy M. L. Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems: A pragmatic randomized controlled study. Drugs and Aging 2011; 28(4), 305–314.
11. Melchiors A. C., Correr C. J., Venson R., Pontarolo R. An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions. Inter. J. Clinic. Pharm. 2012; 34(1), 32–42.
12. Chisholm-Burns M. A., Kimlee J., Spivey C. A., Slack M., Herrier R. N., Hall-Lipsy E., Graffzivin J., Abraham I., Palmer J., Martin J. R., Kramer S.S., Wunz T. US pharmacists’ effect as team members on patient care: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Medical Care 2012; 48(10), 923–933.
13. Kwint H. F., Faber A., Gussekloo J., Bouvy M. L. The contribution of patient interviews to the identification of drug-related problems in home medication review. J. Clinic. Pharm. Therapeut. 2012; 37(6), 674–680.
14. Lindell-Osuagwu L., Sepponen K., Farooqui S., Kokki H., Hämeen-Antiila K., Vainio K. Parental reporting of adverse drug events and other drug-related problems in children in Finland. Eur. J. Clinical Pharmacology 2013; 69(4), 985–994.
15. Alkhateeb, F.M., Clauson, K.A., McCafferty, R., Latif, D.A. Physician attitudes toward pharmacist provision of medication therapy management services. Pharmacy World and Science 2009; 31(4), 487–493.
16. Geurts M. M. E., Talsma J., Brouwers J. R. B. J., de Gier J. J. Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: A systematic review. Br. J. Clinical Pharmacolog 2012; 74(1), 16–33.
17. Wüstmann A. F., Haase-Strey C., Kubiak T., Ritter C. A. Cooperation between community pharmacists and general practitioners in eastern Germany: Attitudes and needs. Inter. J. Clinic. Pharm. 2013; 35(4), 584–592.
18. PCNE klasifikácia farmakoterapeutických problémov V 6.2, http://www.vasesrdce.sk/products/farmakoterapeuticke-problemy (19. 11. 2012).
Štítky
Farmacie FarmakologieČlánek vyšel v časopise
Česká a slovenská farmacie
2014 Číslo 1
- Antibiotika na nachlazení nezabírají! Jak můžeme zpomalit šíření rezistence?
- FDA varuje před selfmonitoringem cukru pomocí chytrých hodinek. Jak je to v Česku?
- Jak a kdy u celiakie začíná reakce na lepek? Možnou odpověď poodkryla čerstvá kanadská studie
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Separácia enantiomérov aminokyselín metódou vysokoúčinnej kvapalinovej chromatografie
- Identifikácia a riešenie farmakoterapeutických problémov z pohľadu verejného lekárnika
- Docent RNDr. Pavel Komárek, PhD. jubiluje
- Globalizácia a jej dopady v lekárenstve SR