#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#
CS
proLékaře.cz / Journals / Perspectives in Surgery / 2019 - 4

Negative pressure therapy with the ULTRAVAC instillation in the therapy of infected laparotomies with fascitis − temporary results of a prospective randomized study

Download PDF Czech version

Authors: A. Jurkovič 1;  J. Bartoš 1;  V. Benčurik 1;  L. Martínek 1,2;  M. Škrovina 1,3
Authors‘ workplace: Centrum vysoce specializované onkologické péče pro dospělé, Nový Jičín 1;  Chirurgické oddělení Nemocnice Nový Jičín a. s. 1;  Katedra chirurgických oborů, Lekářská fakulta Ostravské univerzity, Ostrava 2;  II. Chirurgická klinika, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc 3
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2019, roč. 98, č. 4, s. 152-158.
Category: Original articles

Overview

Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy is a healing modality utilizing continuous or intermittently applied vacuum to the wound bed. Nowadays is available a vacuum system supported by an automated instillation with volumetric control. It`s main therapeutic benefit is the dilution of the exudate, which reduces the viscosity and secures the «delicate» necrectomy.

Method: Presentation of the temporary results of a prospective randomized study comparing the effectiveness of both therapeutic techniques. Entirely 41 patients were enrolled in the study from November 2016 to September 2018. The primary goal of the project is to compare the length of therapy, the number of surgical debridements and evaluation the financial costs. Secondary targets are observed changes in biological load and bacterial spectrum.

Results: The duration of the therapy was 2 days shorter in the experimental group compared to the control sample. However, the average number of applications was higher. Defects with the instillation system were characterized by a shorter cleaning phase (p=0.057). The secondary suture was reached in the experimental group at 84.2% and in the control group at 72.7%. The differences in these parameters were not statistically significant. Fascial disruption was observed in the trial group in 2 patients. The financial costs of the material used was significantly higher in patients with irrigation system (p<0.001). However, the total hospitalization costs did not differ statistically (p=0.097).
There were no significant changes in the bacterial spectrum observed during therapy. There was a significant reduction in the bacterial burden during therapy in the experimental group (p= 0,035).

Conclusion: Vacuum system supported by automated instillation is an effective method, accelerating cleaning phase of the wound healing. A potential risk could be the disruption of the fascia during instillation of the solution. However, the results of our work are not definitive and a larger group of patients is needed for valid conclusions.

Keywords:

vacuum therapy – wound Infection – bacterial load – bacterial spectrum

Sources

  1. Back DA, Scheuermann-Poley C, Willy C. Recommendations on negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and antimicrobial solutions – when, where and how to use: what does the evidence show? Int Wound J. 2013;10 (suppl. 1):32–42. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12183.

  2. Conde´-Green A, Chung TL, Holton LH, et al. Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction − a comparative study. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:394−7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824c9073.

  3. Morykwas MJ. Vaccum-assited closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(Suppl 7S), 121–6. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000225450.12593.12.

  4. Bobkiewicz A, Studniarek A, Drews M, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi): Current status, recommendations and perspectives in the context of modern wound therapy. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Journal 2016;3:8−18. doi.org/10.18487/npwtj.v3i1.23.

  5. Krokowicz L, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Mackiewicz J, et al. “10 years of negative pressure wound therapy [npwt]: evolution of indications for its use,” Negative Pres, Wound Ther 2014;1:27−32.

  6. Aryan, S.P. et al. The effect of vacuum-assisted closure on the bacterial load and type of bacteria: A systematic review. Advanced Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014;3:383–9. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0510.

  7. Baharestani MM, Gabriel A. Use of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of infected abdominal wounds containing mesh: an analysis of outcomes. Int Wound. J 2010; 8:118–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00756.x.

  8. Davis K, Bills J, Barker J, et al. Simultaneous irrigation and negative pressure wound therapy enhances wound healing and reduces wound bioburden in a porcine model. Wound Rep Reg. 2013;21:869–75. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12104.

  9. Gabriel A, Kahn K, Karmy-Jones R. Use of negative pressure wound therapy with automated, volumetric instillation for the treatment of extremity and trunk wounds: clinical outcomes and potential cost effectiveness. Eplasty 2014;14:41.

  10. Phillips PL, Yang Q, Schultz GS. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with periodic instillation using antimicrobial solutions on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants. Int Wound J. 2013;Suppl 48−55, doi: 10.1111/iwj.12180.

  11. Téot L, Boissiere F, Fluieraru S. Novel foam dressing using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation to remove thick exudate. Int Wound J. 2017;14:1−7, doi: 10.1111/iwj.1271.

  12. Gabriel A. Integrated negative pressure wound therapy system with volumetric automated fluid instillation in wounds at risk for compromised healing. Int Wound J 2012;9(Suppl. 1):25–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01014.x.

  13. Allen D, LaBarbera LA, Bondre IL, et al. Comparison of tissue damage, cleansing and cross-contamination potential during wound cleansing via two methods: lavage and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation. Int Wound J 2014;11:198−209; doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01073.x.

  14. Gabriel A, Shores J, Heinrich C, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: a pilot study describing a new method for treating infected wounds. Int Wound J. 2008;5:399–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00423.x.

  15. Jerome D. Advances in negative pressure wound therapy: the VAC instill. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:191–4. doi:10.1097/01.WON.0000264834.18732.3b

  16. Lessing C, Slack P, Hong K, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with controlled saline instillation (NPWTi): Dressing properties and granulation response in vivo. Wounds 2011;23:309–19.

  17. Leung BK, LaBarbera LA, Carroll CA, et al. The effects of normal saline instillation in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing in a porcine model. Wounds 2010;22: 179–87.

  18. Brinkert D, Ali M, Naud M, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with saline instillation: 131 patient case series. Int Wound J 2013;10(Suppl. 1):56–60. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12176.

  19. Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Steinberg JS, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation: International Consensus Guidelines. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1569−79. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80586.

  20. Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Oliver N, et al. Comparison of outcomes for normal saline and an antiseptic solution for negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:657−64.

  21. Wolvos T. The use of negative pressure wound therapy with an automated, volumetric fluid administration: An advancement in wound care. Wounds 2013;25:75−83. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001709.

  22. Wolvos T. Wound instillation – the next step in negative pressure wound therapy. Lessons learned from initial experiences. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004;50:56–6.

  23. Omar M, Gathen M, Liodakis E, et al. A comparative study of negative pressure wound therapy with and without instillation of saline on wound healing. Journal Of Wound Care 2016;25:475−8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.475.

  24. Turek D, Netuka I, Malý J, et al. Terapie závažných ranných infekcí u pacientů se zavedenou mechanickou srdeční podporou pomocí V.A.C. systému. Rozhl Chir. 2009;88:693−6.

  25. Gladis P, Holub R. Použití V.A.C. systému při léčbě infikované cévní protézy – kazuistika. Rozhl Chir. 2010;89:504−7.

  26. Dráč P, Fialová J, Zálešák B, et al. V.A.C. terapie v léčbě traumatických defektů měkkých tkání. Prakt Lék. 2008;88:413−6.

  27. Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Steinberg JS, et al. The impact of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation compared with standard negative-pressure wound therapy: a retrospective, historical, cohort, controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:709–16. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438060.46290.7a.

  28. Goss SG, Schwartz JA, Facchin F, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) better reduces postdebridement bioburden in chronically infected lower extremity wounds than NPWT alone. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2014;4:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.02.001.

Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery
Principles of antibiotic therapy
The role of new antibiotics in intra-abdominal infections in the era of multi-resistant bacteria
Acute mesenteric ischemia with necrosis of entire small intestine
Hemangiomatosis of the greater omentum – a case report
Growth of colorectal liver metastases is not accelerated by intraportal administration of stem cells after portal vein embolization
Surgical treatment of alveolar echinococcosis: a single centre experience and systematic review of the literature
Article was published in

Perspectives in Surgery

Issue 4
2019 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#