Burden on staff providing direct care to patients in postacute and long term care and how it can be influenced by education – an intervention study
Authors:
Nováková Martina 1; Holmerová Iva 2; Šteffl Michal 3
Authors‘ workplace:
Geriatrická interní klinika 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole Praha
1; Gerontologické centrum, Praha 8
2; Katedra biomedicínského základu v kinantropologii Fakulty tělesné výchovy a sportu Univerzity Karlovy
3
Published in:
Geriatrie a Gerontologie 2024, 13, č. 1: 15-20
Category:
Original Article
Overview
Inpatient aftercare facilities concentrate a medically heterogeneous group of seniors who are very demanding in terms of nursing, medical, psychological and motivational care. These realities have significant implications for staff from all professions that provide direct care to patients in aftercare beds. The present study evaluates how staff providing direct care to clients in aftercare facilities perceive their particular psychological burden in their profession and whether and how their overall attitude and satisfaction is affected by attending educational seminars on communication and approach to patients with dementia. The P-CAT and PCTB questionnaires were used in the survey, and the workers were divided into an intervention group, which received a series of educational seminars, and a non-intervention group, and then the two groups were compared. The results of the study showed a statistically significant reduction in the perceived burden of the intervention group in communicating with patients with dementia, as well as a higher tolerance of problem behaviors in these patients.
Keywords:
aftercare, staff burden, polymorbidity, dementia, communication, education
Sources
1. Auer S, et al. Professional Care Team Burden (PCTB) scale – reliability, validity and factor analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015: 13: 17.
2. Edwardsson D. Development and initial testing of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT). Int Psychogeriatr 2010; 22:1, 101–108.
3. Holmerová I. Case management v péči o lidi žijící s demencí. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií, 2018.
4. Jarošová D, Šindelová K, Topinko-
vá E. Komplexní hodnocení seniorů v zařízeních dlouhodobé péče. Prakt Lék 2012; 92(7): 396–400.
5. Kalvach Z. Geriatrické syndromy a geriatrický pacient. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing 2008; 336.
6. Maroušková I, Seitl M. Pracovní zátěž, životní spokojenost a work-life balance zaměstnanců přímé péče v domovech pro seniory v jižních Čechách a Praze. Studie, výzkumy a analýzy. Sociální práce 2014;14(1): 40–50.
7. Hermanová M. Aktuální kapitoly z péče o seniory. Evropský sociální fond, Národní centrum ošetřovatelství a nelékařských zdravotnických oborů. T.I.G.E.R.
2008.
8. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti AL, Oliveira GR, et al. Nursing home care: exploring the role of religiousness in the mental health, quality of life and stress of formal caregivers. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2014; 21(5): 403–413.
9. Zarit SH. Diagnosis and management of caregiver burden in dementia. Handb Clin Neurol 2008; 89: 101–106.
10. Quan L, Zhang Y, Jiang F, et al. influence of workload, personality, and psychological flexibility on occupational stress among medical staff: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 929683.
11. Kunkle R, Chaperon C, Hanna KM. formal caregiver burden in nursing homes: a concept analysis. J Gerontol Nurs 2020; 46(9): 19–24.
12. Kunkle R, Chaperon C, Popejoy LL, et al. Understanding formal caregiver burden in nursing assistants in nursing homes: a mixed methods approach. Res Gerontol Nurs 2023; 16(5): 231–240.
13. Wei JL, Villwock JA. Balance versus integration: work-life considerations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2021; 54(4): 823–837.
14. Kalanlar B, Kuru Alici N. The effect of care burden on formal caregiver‘s quality of work life: a mixed-methods study. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 34(4): 1001–1009.
15. Narme P. Burnout in nursing staff caring for patients with dementia: role of empathy and impact of empathy-based training program. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 2018; 16(2): 215–
222.
16. Cleary J, Doody O. Nurses’ experience of caring for people with intellectual disability and dementia. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26(5–6): 620–631.
17. Kunkle R, Chaperon C, Berger AM. Formal caregiver burden in nursing homes: an integrative review. West J Nurs Res 2021; 43(9): 877–893.
Labels
Geriatrics General practitioner for adults Orthopaedic prostheticsArticle was published in
Geriatrics and Gerontology
2024 Issue 1
Most read in this issue
- Interprofessionl recommendations for Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics and therapy: Palliative care in contemporary context
- Arterial hypertension in elderly
- Evaluation of the nutritional status and sarcopenia in a geriatric patient. Clinical guidelines of the board of the Czech Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics
- Evaluation and optimization of medication in seniors with polypharmacy and multimorbidity. Clinical guidelines of the Board of the Czech Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Czech Medical Association JEP