Is mechanical valve implantation the best solution for patients with aortic valve disease?
Authors:
D. Čoček; P. Pazderková; M. Šetina
Authors‘ workplace:
Kardiochirurgické oddělení Nemocnice České Budějovice a. s.
primář MUDr. Marek Šetina, CSc.
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2006; 86(6): 328-330
Category:
Of different specialties
Overview
Aortic valve replacement using a mechanical valve is a conventional procedure for patients under 65 years of age but requires lifetime anticoagulation. The authors‘ question is whether this choice is appropriate and safe enough.
Methods:
Consecutive patients who had mechanical aortic valve replacement and were operated on between 2000 and 2003 in Departure of cardiac surgery at Hospital Ceske Budejovice, were followed up for one year.
Results:
Thirty day mortality was 2.9 %. Follow-up was completed on 98% patients. Late mortality was 4%. There were neither tromboembolic events nor bleeding during one year follow-up, but we noted two strokes of unclear origin and one case of prosthetic endocarditis. The symptomatology NYHA decreased from 2.36±0.91 to 1.13±0.45.
Conclusion:
Aortic valve replacement using mechanical valve is safe and related complications are acceptable.
Key words:
mechanical valve, aortic valve.
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2006 Issue 6
Most read in this issue
- The harmful effect of noise on the human organism
- Pulmonary embolism in the pneumology out-patient clinic
- Inhaled insulin
- Why and what kind of physical training is most effective for health and quality of life in older persons?