Association of preterm birth with lipid disorders in early adulthood: A Swedish cohort study

Authors: Casey Crump ^aff001; Jan Sundquist ^aff002; Kristina Sundquist ^aff002
Authors place of work: Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health and of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America ^aff001; Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden ^aff002
Published in the journal: Association of preterm birth with lipid disorders in early adulthood: A Swedish cohort study. PLoS Med 16(10): e1002947. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002947
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002947

Summary

Background

Preterm birth has previously been linked with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adulthood. However, associations with lipid disorders (e.g., high cholesterol or triglycerides), which are major risk factors for CVD, have seldom been examined and are conflicting. Clinicians will increasingly encounter adult survivors of preterm birth and will need to understand the long-term health sequelae. We conducted the first large population-based study to determine whether preterm birth is associated with an increased risk of lipid disorders.

Methods and findings

A retrospective national cohort study was conducted of all 2,235,012 persons born as singletons in Sweden during 1973 to 1995 (48.6% women), who were followed up for lipid disorders identified from nationwide inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy data through 2016 (maximum age 44 years). Cox regression was used to adjust for other perinatal and maternal factors, and co-sibling analyses assessed the potential influence of unmeasured shared familial (genetic and/or environmental) factors. A total of 25,050 (1.1%) persons were identified with lipid disorders in 30.3 million person-years of follow-up. Each additional 5 weeks of gestation were associated with a 14% reduction in risk of lipid disorders (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83–0.89; P < 0.001). Relative to full-term birth (gestational age 39–41 weeks), the adjusted HR associated with preterm birth (<37 weeks) was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.16–1.29; P < 0.001), and further stratified was 2.00 (1.41–2.85; P < 0.001) for extremely preterm (22–27 weeks), 1.33 (1.19–1.49; P < 0.001) for very preterm (28–33 weeks), and 1.19 (1.12–1.26; P < 0.001) for late preterm (34–36 weeks). These findings were similar in men and women (e.g., preterm versus full-term, men: HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31; P < 0.001; women: HR, 1.23; 1.12–1.32; P < 0.001). Co-sibling analyses suggested that they were substantially though not completely explained by shared genetic or environmental factors in families. The main study limitation was the unavailability of laboratory data to assess specific types or severity of lipid disorders.

Conclusions

In this large national cohort, preterm birth was associated with an increased risk of lipid disorders in early- to midadulthood. Persons born prematurely may need early preventive evaluation and long-term monitoring for lipid disorders to reduce their future cardiovascular risks.

Keywords:

Birth – Labor and delivery – Lipids – Cholesterol – cardiovascular diseases – Sweden – Preterm birth – Lipid analysis

Introduction

Preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks) affects 11% of all births worldwide [1], 10% in the United States [2, 3], and 5% to 8% in most European countries [4]. Preterm birth has previously been associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in adulthood [5]. The underlying mechanisms may involve higher risks of hypertension [6, 7] and diabetes [8–11] that also have been reported in preterm-born adults. However, the risks of lipid disorders (e.g., high cholesterol or triglycerides), which are also major risk factors for IHD, have seldom been examined. Such information could improve our understanding of potential mechanisms and further inform preventive actions and anticipatory screening in the growing population of adults who were born prematurely.

The few prior studies of preterm birth in relation to lipid disorders have yielded discrepant findings. The largest study to date assessed plasma lipid levels in a British cohort of 7,847 adults aged 44 to 45 years and reported a modest inverse linear association between gestational age at birth and total cholesterol levels among women only [12]. However, statistical power was limited for most comparisons, and risks in specific gestational age groups were not reported. The only other prior investigations involved small clinical samples of up to a few hundred participants. Some [13–15] but not all [16–19] of these studies reported higher levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or triglycerides in adults born prematurely or with low birth weight. No larger population-based studies have examined the risk of lipid disorders in persons born prematurely who were followed into adulthood. Furthermore, if such associations exist, it is unknown whether they are related to shared familial (genetic and/or environmental) factors that predispose to both preterm birth and lipid disorders or direct effects of preterm birth.

To address these knowledge gaps, we conducted a national cohort study of more than 2 million adults in Sweden. The goals of this study were to examine associations between gestational age at birth and risk of lipid disorders at ages 18 to 44 years, the maximum follow-up currently possible in this large cohort, to assess whether these associations differ according to sex or fetal growth, and to explore for potential confounding by shared familial (genetic and/or environmental) factors using co-sibling analyses.

Methods

Study population

The Swedish Birth Registry contains prenatal and birth information for nearly all births nationwide since 1973 [20]. Using this registry, we identified all 2,341,668 singleton live births in Sweden during 1973 to 1995. These birth years were chosen to allow sufficient follow-up into adulthood. We excluded all 98,714 (4.2%) persons who were no longer living in Sweden at age 18 years, 1,162 (<0.1%) others who were diagnosed with lipid disorders prior to age 18 years (thus allowing assessment of new-onset lipid disorders in adulthood), and 6,780 (0.3%) others with missing information for gestational age, leaving 2,235,012 persons (95.4% of the original cohort) for inclusion in the study. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Lund University in Sweden (No. 2010/476). Participant consent was not required because this study used only de-identified registry-based secondary data.

Ascertainment of gestational age at birth and lipid disorders

Gestational age at birth was identified from the Swedish Birth Registry based on maternal report of last menstrual period in the 1970s and ultrasonography estimation starting in the 1980s and onward. This was analyzed alternatively as a continuous variable or categorical variable with 6 groups: extremely preterm (22–27 weeks), very preterm (28–33 weeks), late preterm (34–36 weeks), early term (37–38 weeks), full term (39–41 weeks, used as the reference group), and post term (≥42 weeks). Early-term birth was examined as a separate category because it has previously been associated with increased cardiovascular- and endocrine-related mortality relative to later-term birth [21, 22]. In addition, the first 3 groups were combined to provide summary estimates for preterm birth.

The study cohort was followed up for lipid disorders from age 18 years through the end of follow-up in 2016 (maximum age 44 years). Lipid disorders were defined based on either of the following: (1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for lipid disorders (ICD-8/9: 272; ICD-10: E78); or (2) prescription of lipid-modifying medications (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification System code C10) without a concurrent diagnosis of IHD (ICD-8/9: 410–414; ICD-10: I20-I25; i.e., to exclude medications prescribed solely for secondary prevention of IHD). ICD codes were identified from all primary and secondary diagnoses in the Swedish Hospital and Outpatient Registries. The Swedish Hospital Registry contains all primary and secondary hospital discharge diagnoses from 6 populous counties in southern Sweden starting in 1964, and with nationwide coverage starting in 1987; these diagnoses are currently >99% complete, and their positive predictive value for most chronic disorders has been reported to be 85% to 95% [23]. The Swedish Outpatient Registry contains all outpatient diagnoses from specialty clinics nationwide starting in 2001. Lipid-modifying medication prescriptions were identified using the Swedish Pharmacy Registry, which includes all prescriptions nationwide since July 1, 2005.

Other study variables

Other perinatal and maternal characteristics that may be associated with gestational age at birth and lipid disorders were identified using the Swedish Birth Registry and national census data, which were linked using an anonymous personal identification number. The following were included as adjustment variables: birth year (continuous and categorical by decade), sex, birth order (1, 2, ≥3), maternal age at delivery (continuous), maternal education level (≤9, 10–12, >12 years), maternal birth country or region (Sweden, other Europe/US/Canada, Asia/Oceania, Africa, Latin America, other/unknown), maternal body mass index (BMI; continuous), and maternal history of lipid disorders (identified using the same ICD codes as above, and ICD-7 289.0). In a secondary analysis, further adjustment was made for fetal growth (small for gestational age [SGA; <10th percentile]; appropriate for gestational age [AGA; 10th–90th percentile]; large for gestational age [LGA; >90th percentile]), to assess the association between gestational age at birth and lipid disorders independently of fetal growth.

Maternal BMI was assessed at the beginning of prenatal care starting in 1982 and was available for 38.8% of women. Data were >99% complete for all other variables. Missing data for each covariate were imputed using a standard multiple imputation procedure based on the variable’s relationship with all other covariates and lipid disorders [24]. The analytic approach was determined prior to beginning the data analyses, though there was no formal statistical analysis plan.

Statistical analysis

Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for associations between gestational age at birth and lipid disorders at ages 18 to 44 years. Attained age was used as the Cox model time axis. Individuals were censored at emigration as determined by absence of a Swedish residential address in census data (n = 131,492; 5.9%) or death as identified in the Swedish Death Registry (n = 16,004; 0.7%). Analyses were conducted both unadjusted and adjusted for covariates (as above).

Co-sibling analyses were performed to assess for potential confounding by unmeasured shared familial (genetic and/or environmental) factors among individuals who had at least one sibling (N = 1,881,473 [84.2% of the cohort] in 846,164 families). This approach can help further elucidate whether associations observed in the primary analyses are related to direct effects of preterm birth as opposed to shared genetic or environmental factors that may predispose to both preterm birth and lipid disorders. These analyses used stratified Cox regression with a separate stratum for each family as identified by the mother’s anonymous identification number. In the stratified Cox model, each set of siblings had its own baseline hazard function that reflects the family’s shared genetic and environmental factors, and thus associations between gestational age at birth and time to diagnosis of lipid disorders were examined within families, controlling for their shared factors. In addition, these analyses were further adjusted for the same covariates as in the primary analyses.

The co-sibling design has certain limitations and assumptions [25–27] that were explored in 2 sensitivity analyses. First, by definition, this design includes only persons with siblings. We explored generalizability to persons without siblings by repeating the primary analyses while restricting alternatively to persons with siblings (N = 1,881,473) or those without (N = 353,539). In a post hoc meta-analysis, risk estimates from a standard analysis of persons without siblings and from the co-sibling analysis were pooled using the inverse-variance method [28]. Second, we explored the possibility of preterm birth in one sibling influencing the risk of lipid disorders in another (i.e., carryover effects) by fitting bidirectional models to explore whether different patterns of preterm birth within families (i.e., either the first- or second-born offspring had preterm birth) modified the co-sibling analysis results [26]. In these analyses, the co-sibling results from families in which the first child was born preterm (N = 43,031) were compared with those in which the second child was born preterm (N = 28,609).

Potential interactions between gestational age at birth and sex, fetal growth, or mode of delivery (vaginal or Caesarean section) were examined in relation to risk of lipid disorders on the additive and multiplicative scale [29, 30]. Several other sensitivity analyses also were performed: First, we explored the influence of lipid disorders that were potentially secondary to atherogenic medications. In these analyses, follow-up was started at July 1, 2006 (one year after inception of the pharmacy register). Lipid disorders were considered to be potentially secondary to medications and were excluded from the study outcome if preceded by ≥2 prescriptions of the following medications previously associated with lipid disorders: corticosteroids (ATC code H02), antiepileptics (N03), phenothiazines (N05AA, N05AB, N05AC), androgens (G03B), cyclosporine (L04AD01), and retinoids (D10BA) for systemic use [31]. Second, as an alternative to multiple imputation, the primary analyses were repeated after restricting to individuals with complete data (N = 866,362). Third, the primary analyses were repeated after restricting to persons born in 1982 or later when gestational ages were estimated predominantly by ultrasound rather than last menstrual period (N = 1,399,126). All statistical tests were 2-sided and used an α-level of 0.05. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp, https://www.stata.com).

Results

Table 1 shows perinatal and maternal characteristics by gestational age at birth. Preterm infants were more likely than full-term infants to be male or first-born; and their mothers were more likely to be at the extremes of age, have low education level, be foreign-born, or have a history of lipid disorders.

**Tab. 1. Characteristics of study participants by gestational age at birth, Sweden, 1973–1995.**

Associations between gestational age at birth and lipid disorders

A total of 25,050 (1.1%) persons were identified with lipid disorders in 30.3 million person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate (per 100,000 person-years) was 82.79 in the overall cohort, 101.89 among those born preterm, and 80.12 among those born full term (Table 2).

**Tab. 2. Adjusted HRs for lipid disorders associated with gestational age at birth, Sweden, 1973–2016.**

Gestational age at birth was inversely associated with risk of lipid disorders. Each additional 5 weeks of gestation were associated with a 14% lower risk on average (full model: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83–0.89; P < 0.001; Table 2). Preterm and extremely preterm birth were associated with 1.2- and 2.0-fold risks, respectively (full model: HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16–1.29; P < 0.001; and 2.00; 95% CI, 1.41–2.85; P < 0.001). Early-term birth also was associated with a slightly increased risk of lipid disorders, relative to full-term birth (full model: HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05–1.13; P < 0.001). Fig 1 shows a forest plot of adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for different gestational age groups compared to full-term birth.

**Fig. 1. Adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for risk of lipid disorders by gestational age at birth compared to full-term birth, Sweden, 1973–2016.**

Most of the adjusted HRs were <10% lower than the corresponding unadjusted HRs (Table A in S1 Appendix); neither birth year nor any variables in Table 1 were major confounders. Additional adjustment for fetal growth also had a negligible effect on the risk estimates (e.g., full model, preterm versus full term: HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.17–1.30; P < 0.001). The proportional hazards assumption was assessed by examining log-log plots [32] and was met in each model.

Co-sibling analyses

In co-sibling analyses to control for unmeasured shared familial factors, all risk estimates were substantially attenuated compared with the primary results. For example, in the full model, the adjusted HRs for lipid disorders associated with preterm and extremely preterm birth, respectively, were 1.10 and 1.46 in the co-sibling analysis (Table 3) compared with 1.23 and 2.00 in the primary analysis (Table 2).

In sensitivity analyses, the appropriateness of the co-sibling design was assessed by exploring generalizability of the primary findings to persons without siblings. The risk estimates were only slightly lower in persons with siblings (e.g., preterm versus full term: adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13–1.28) compared with those without siblings (1.25; 95% CI, 1.13–1.38; P for interaction = 0.41). In a meta-analysis that combined this latter risk estimate (i.e., from persons without siblings) with that from the co-sibling analysis (restricted to persons with siblings), the pooled HR for lipid disorders associated with preterm versus full-term birth was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.01–1.25; P = 0.03).

We also assessed for potential bias from carryover effects of preterm birth in one sibling affecting the outcome in another sibling [25–27] by comparing results from families in which the first child was born preterm to those in which the second child was born preterm. These analyses yielded similar results (adjusted HRs 1.2–1.3), suggesting that there was no bias from an exposure-to-outcome carryover effect.

Interactions

Lipid disorders had a higher incidence among men than women in the overall cohort (97.60 versus 67.01 per 100,000 person-years) and among those born preterm (117.33 versus 82.69). However, the adjusted HR for lipid disorders associated with preterm birth was similar among men (1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31; P < 0.001) and women (1.23; 1.12–1.34; P < 0.001; Table B in S1 Appendix). No significant interactions were found between preterm birth and sex on the additive (P = 0.43) or multiplicative (P = 0.66) scale (Table C in S1 Appendix). The absence of additive interaction suggests that preterm birth accounted for a similar number of lipid disorder cases among men and women.

Potential interactions between gestational age at birth and fetal growth were also explored. The highest risk of lipid disorders occurred among those born SGA at early term (adjusted HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.45–1.75; P < 0.001) or SGA and preterm (1.50; 1.28–1.76; P < 0.001), relative to AGA and full-term. A positive interaction was found between SGA and early-term birth on both the additive (P = 0.003) and multiplicative (P = 0.01) scale (i.e., their combined effects on risk of lipid disorders exceeded the sum or product of their separate effects). However, there was no evidence of interaction between fetal growth and preterm birth (additive, P = 0.97; multiplicative, P = 0.60; Table D in S1 Appendix).

The association between preterm birth and risk of lipid disorders was slightly stronger among persons delivered by Caesarean section (adjusted HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18–1.48; P < 0.001; N = 225,315 [10.1% of the cohort]) than those delivered vaginally (1.18; 95% CI, 1.11–1.26; P < 0.001; N = 2,009,469 [89.9%]; tests for interaction: additive, P = 0.06; multiplicative, P = 0.09).

Other sensitivity analyses

Among 24,403 persons diagnosed with lipid disorders at least one year after inception of the pharmacy register, 354 (25.6%) of those born preterm and 4,098 (25.1%) of those born full-term had ≥2 prior prescriptions of an atherogenic medication (as defined above). Exclusion of these cases from the study outcome resulted in a negligible change in risk estimates. For example, in the most fully adjusted model, the HR for lipid disorders associated with preterm birth was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.15–1.29; P < 0.001) when including these cases, compared with 1.23 (95% CI, 1.16–1.32; P < 0.001) after excluding them. The corresponding HRs associated with extremely preterm birth were 1.91 (95% CI, 1.31–2.79; P = 0.001) and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.28–3.08; P = 0.002), respectively. These findings suggest that lipid disorders that were secondary to medications had little influence on the overall results.

In a complete case analysis performed as an alternative to multiple imputation, all risk estimates were similar to those from the primary analysis (e.g., full model, preterm versus full term: HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08–1.39; P = 0.002). When the primary analyses were repeated after restricting to persons born in 1982 or later (when gestational ages were estimated predominantly by ultrasound), the risk estimates were also minimally changed (e.g., full model, preterm versus full term: HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14–1.37; P < 0.001).

Discussion

In this large national cohort study, preterm birth was associated with a modestly (20%–25%) increased risk of lipid disorders among men and women in early- to midadulthood. Stronger associations were seen at earlier gestational ages, including a 2-fold risk among those born extremely preterm (<28 weeks). Co-sibling analyses suggested that these findings were partially related to shared familial factors that are associated with both preterm birth and lipid disorders, as opposed to direct effects of preterm birth.

To our knowledge, this is the first large population-based study to examine gestational age at birth in relation to risk of lipid disorders in adulthood. Previous evidence from smaller studies has been conflicting. The largest prior study assessed plasma lipid levels in a British cohort of 7,847 adults aged 44 to 45 years and reported a weak inverse association between gestational age at birth and total cholesterol only in women (difference in mean level per additional week of gestation: −0.02; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.001; P = 0.04; adjusted for birth weight, BMI, and other perinatal and sociodemographic factors) [12]. However, gestational age was not associated with total cholesterol in men, nor with LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or triglyceride levels in either women or men. Other small clinical studies with up to a few hundred participants also have explored gestational age at birth in relation to lipid levels in early adulthood. Some [13–15] but not all [16–19] have reported higher levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, or triglycerides in young adults (mean ages 25–40 years) who were born preterm or with low birth weight compared with their full-term or normal birth weight counterparts. A meta-analysis of such studies found that preterm birth was associated with significantly higher LDL-C levels compared with full-term birth (0.15 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.01–0.30; P = 0.04; based on 5 studies) and near-significantly higher total cholesterol levels (0.32 mmol/L; −0.01 to 0.65; P = 0.05; 6 studies) but no differences in HDL-C or triglyceride levels (8 and 9 studies, respectively) [33].

The present study extends these prior findings by assessing lipid disorders in a large population-based cohort using nationwide diagnoses and medication prescriptions and examining sex-specific differences and potential confounding by shared familial factors. In this cohort and in other general populations, lipid disorders have a higher overall prevalence among men [12]. However, our findings suggest that preterm birth accounted for a similar number of lipid disorder cases among men and women. Furthermore, the observed associations between preterm birth and lipid disorders appeared to be substantially though not completely explained by shared genetic or environmental factors in the families of those affected. This is in contrast to previously reported associations between preterm birth and IHD, mortality, and other outcomes in this cohort that appeared largely independent of shared familial factors [5, 22, 34, 35]. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the attenuated risk estimates in co-sibling analyses were unlikely to be explained by idiosyncratic differences in persons with siblings compared to those without.

Family- and twin-based studies have suggested that genetic factors inherited primarily from the mother influence gestational age at birth, with an estimated heritability of 25% to 40% [36–38]. In addition, heritability estimates for different lipid components range from 28% to 92% [39, 40], with numerous genetic loci identified [41]. Several functional mutations, including in the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 gene (PCSK9) and the apolipoprotein B gene (e.g., APOB3500), have been found to impair LDL receptor-mediated catabolism of LDL-C [41–43]. LDL-C is also a known precursor of progesterone synthesis during pregnancy [44]. Prior studies have suggested that either high or low total cholesterol levels preceding or during pregnancy are associated with increased risk of preterm delivery [45, 46]. Maternal total cholesterol levels during the first trimester and their change during pregnancy have been found to predict preterm delivery [47]. Additional clinical and genetic studies are needed to further elucidate the mechanisms and possible shared genetic factors that might link preterm birth with lipid disorders.

Findings from the present study may have several clinical implications. First, they show that preterm birth, especially at the earliest gestational ages, may be an important risk factor for lipid disorders in adulthood. A higher incidence of lipid disorders may contribute to the higher risks of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease (CVD) previously reported in adults who were born prematurely [5, 22, 33, 48]. Early preventive evaluation and monitoring for lipid disorders should be incorporated in the long-term care of persons who were born prematurely. To help identify such patients, medical records and history taking at all ages should routinely include birth history, including gestational age, birth weight, and perinatal complications [49–51]. Such information can help trigger anticipatory screening, timely treatment, and early preventive actions, including lifestyle counseling to help reduce the risk of lipid disorders and subsequent risk of CVD.

A key strength of the present study was the ability to examine gestational age at birth in relation to lipid disorders for the first time in a large population-based cohort with follow-up into early- to midadulthood, using nationwide birth, medical, and pharmacy registry data. This study design minimizes potential selection or ascertainment biases and enables more robust risk estimates based on a national population. The large sample size enabled well-powered assessments of narrowly defined gestational age groups and sex-specific analyses. The results were controlled for other perinatal and maternal factors as well as unmeasured shared familial factors using co-sibling analyses.

Limitations include the unavailability of laboratory data to verify diagnoses. However, high positive predictive values for most chronic disorders have been reported in the Swedish registries [23], and the Swedish national health system may reduce disparities in healthcare access and help improve ascertainment of lipid disorders in the general population. We were unable to assess the severity of lipid disorders or distinguish more specific disorders affecting lipid components (e.g., LDL-C, HDL-C, or triglycerides). We lacked information on spontaneous versus medically indicated preterm birth, which was not systematically recorded during most years of this birth cohort. In addition, we lacked information on diet, physical activity, or smoking, which may potentially modify the association between preterm birth and lipid disorders. Assessment of behavioral factors later in life would be useful in future studies with access to this information. Lipid disorders were assessed at ages 18 to 44 years in the present study, and thus additional follow-up will be needed to examine this outcome in later adulthood. Lastly, this study was limited to Sweden and will need replication in other countries when possible, including diverse populations that would allow assessment for potential racial or ethnic heterogeneity.

In summary, we found that preterm birth was associated with an increased risk of lipid disorders in early- to midadulthood in a large population-based cohort. These findings did not appear to be explained by atherogenic medications or lipid disorders that developed in childhood or adolescence. However, co-sibling analyses suggested that they were partially due to shared familial (genetic and/or environmental) factors that predispose to both preterm birth and lipid disorders. Future studies of shared genetic factors that influence both the timing of delivery and lipid metabolism may help further elucidate the potential mechanisms. The associations we found between preterm birth and lipid disorders may partially mediate the increased CVD risks previously reported in adults born prematurely [5]. Persons with a history of preterm birth may need early preventive evaluation and long-term monitoring for lipid disorders to reduce their future risks of CVD.

Supporting information

S1 STROBE checklist [docx]
STROBE checklist.

S1 Appendix [docx]

Zdroje

1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–72. Epub 2012/06/12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 22682464.

2. Purisch SE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(7):387–91. Epub 2017/09/04. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009 28865982.

3. March of Dimes. PeriStats: March of Dimes; 2019. Available from: http://www.marchofdimes.com/Peristats/. [cited 2019 August 12].

4. Zeitlin J, Szamotulska K, Drewniak N, Mohangoo AD, Chalmers J, Sakkeus L, et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. BJOG. 2013;120(11):1356–65. Epub 2013/05/25. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12281 23700966; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4285908.

5. Crump C, Howell EA, Stroustrup A, McLaughlin MA, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Association of Preterm Birth With Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Adulthood. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. Epub 2019/06/04. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1327 31157896.

6. Crump C, Winkleby MA, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Risk of hypertension among young adults who were born preterm: a Swedish national study of 636,000 births. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):797–803. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq440 21320866; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3105282.

7. de Jong F, Monuteaux MC, van Elburg RM, Gillman MW, Belfort MB. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm birth and later systolic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2012;59(2):226–34. Epub 2011/12/14. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.181784 22158643; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3266458.

8. Crump C, Winkleby MA, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Risk of diabetes among young adults born preterm in Sweden. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(5):1109–13. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2108 21411504; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3114485.

9. Kajantie E, Strang-Karlsson S, Hovi P, Wehkalampi K, Lahti J, Kaseva N, et al. Insulin sensitivity and secretory response in adults born preterm: the Helsinki Study of Very Low Birth Weight Adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(1):244–50. Epub 2014/10/11. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3184 25303493.

10. Hovi P, Andersson S, Eriksson JG, Jarvenpaa AL, Strang-Karlsson S, Makitie O, et al. Glucose regulation in young adults with very low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(20):2053–63. Epub 2007/05/18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067187 17507704.

11. Hofman PL, Regan F, Jackson WE, Jefferies C, Knight DB, Robinson EM, et al. Premature birth and later insulin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(21):2179–86. Epub 2004/11/19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042275 15548778.

12. Cooper R, Atherton K, Power C. Gestational age and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort followed to mid-life. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(1):235–44. Epub 2008/07/29. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn154 18658251; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3481805.

13. Fagerberg B, Bondjers L, Nilsson P. Low birth weight in combination with catch-up growth predicts the occurrence of the metabolic syndrome in men at late middle age: the Atherosclerosis and Insulin Resistance study. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):254–9. Epub 2004/08/25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01361.x 15324369.

14. Hovi P, Kajantie E, Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Jarvenpaa AL, Andersson S, et al. Lipoprotein subclass profiles in young adults born preterm at very low birth weight. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:57. Epub 2013/05/02. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-57 23631373; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3661387.

15. Rotteveel J, van Weissenbruch MM, Twisk JW, Delemarre-Van de Waal HA. Abnormal lipid profile and hyperinsulinaemia after a mixed meal: additional cardiovascular risk factors in young adults born preterm. Diabetologia. 2008;51(7):1269–75. Epub 2008/05/23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1029-5 18496668.

16. Dalziel SR, Parag V, Rodgers A, Harding JE. Cardiovascular risk factors at age 30 following pre-term birth. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(4):907–15. Epub 2007/05/01. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym067 17468503.

17. Hovi P, Turanlahti M, Strang-Karlsson S, Wehkalampi K, Jarvenpaa AL, Eriksson JG, et al. Intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilatation in the Helsinki study of very low birth weight adults. Pediatrics. 2011;127(2):e304–11. Epub 2011/01/26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2199 21262880.

18. Singhal A, Kattenhorn M, Cole TJ, Deanfield J, Lucas A. Preterm birth, vascular function, and risk factors for atherosclerosis. Lancet. 2001;358(9288):1159–60. Epub 2001/10/13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06276-6 11597675.

19. Skilton MR, Viikari JS, Juonala M, Laitinen T, Lehtimaki T, Taittonen L, et al. Fetal growth and preterm birth influence cardiovascular risk factors and arterial health in young adults: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(12):2975–81. Epub 2011/09/24. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.234757 21940950.

20. Statistics Sweden. The Swedish Medical Birth Register. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/halsodataregister/medicinskafodelseregistret/inenglish. [cited 2019 August 12].

21. Crump C, Sundquist K, Winkleby MA, Sundquist J. Early-term birth (37–38 weeks) and mortality in young adulthood. Epidemiology. 2013;24(2):270–6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318280da0f 23337240.

22. Crump C, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA, Sundquist K. Gestational age at birth and mortality from infancy into mid-adulthood: a national cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019;3(6):408–17. Epub 2019/04/09. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30108-7 30956154.

23. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450 21658213; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3142234.

24. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.

25. Lahey BB, D'Onofrio BM. All in the Family: Comparing Siblings to Test Causal Hypotheses Regarding Environmental Influences on Behavior. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19(5):319–23. Epub 2010/10/01. doi: 10.1177/0963721410383977 23645975; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3643791.

26. Sjolander A, Frisell T, Kuja-Halkola R, Oberg S, Zetterqvist J. Carryover Effects in Sibling Comparison Designs. Epidemiology. 2016;27(6):852–8. Epub 2016/08/05. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000541 27488059.

27. D'Onofrio BM, Lahey BB, Turkheimer E, Lichtenstein P. Critical need for family-based, quasi-experimental designs in integrating genetic and social science research. Am J Public Health. 2013;103 Suppl 1:S46–55. Epub 2013/08/10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252 23927516; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3778076.

28. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context 2001. p. 285–321.

29. Li R, Chambless L. Test for additive interaction in proportional hazards models. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(3):227–36. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.009 17320789.

30. VanderWeele TJ. Causal interactions in the proportional hazards model. Epidemiology. 2011;22(5):713–7. Epub 2011/05/12. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821db503 21558856; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3150431.

31. Henkin Y, Como JA, Oberman A. Secondary dyslipidemia. Inadvertent effects of drugs in clinical practice. JAMA. 1992;267(7):961–8. Epub 1992/02/19. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.7.961 1734110.

32. Grambsch PM. Goodness-of-fit and diagnostics for proportional hazards regression models. Cancer Treat Res. 1995;75:95–112. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_5 7640169.

33. Parkinson JR, Hyde MJ, Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Modi N. Preterm birth and the metabolic syndrome in adult life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):e1240–63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2177 23509172.

34. Crump C, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA, Sundquist K. Preterm birth and risk of chronic kidney disease from childhood into mid-adulthood: national cohort study. BMJ. 2019;365:l1346. Epub 2019/05/03. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1346 31043374; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6490674.

35. Crump C, Friberg D, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Preterm birth and risk of sleep-disordered breathing from childhood into mid-adulthood. Int J Epidemiol. 2019. Epub 2019/04/22. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz075 31006012.

36. Clausson B, Lichtenstein P, Cnattingius S. Genetic influence on birthweight and gestational length determined by studies in offspring of twins. BJOG. 2000;107(3):375–81. Epub 2000/03/31. 10740335.

37. Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R, Lie RT. Familial patterns of preterm delivery: maternal and fetal contributions. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(4):474–9. Epub 2007/12/01. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm319 18048376.

38. Svensson AC, Sandin S, Cnattingius S, Reilly M, Pawitan Y, Hultman CM, et al. Maternal effects for preterm birth: a genetic epidemiologic study of 630,000 families. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(11):1365–72. Epub 2009/10/27. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp328 19854802.

39. Heller DA, de Faire U, Pedersen NL, Dahlen G, McClearn GE. Genetic and environmental influences on serum lipid levels in twins. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(16):1150–6. Epub 1993/04/22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304223281603 8455681.

40. Iliadou A, Snieder H, Wang X, Treiber FA, Davis CL. Heritabilities of lipids in young European American and African American twins. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005;8(5):492–8. Epub 2005/10/11. doi: 10.1375/183242705774310187 16212838.

41. Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, Edmondson AC, Stylianou IM, Koseki M, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466(7307):707–13. Epub 2010/08/06. doi: 10.1038/nature09270 20686565; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3039276.

42. Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(17):1384–94. Epub 2016/02/26. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw028 26908947.

43. Futema M, Whittall RA, Kiley A, Steel LK, Cooper JA, Badmus E, et al. Analysis of the frequency and spectrum of mutations recognised to cause familial hypercholesterolaemia in routine clinical practice in a UK specialist hospital lipid clinic. Atherosclerosis. 2013;229(1):161–8. Epub 2013/05/15. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.011 23669246; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3701838.

44. Tuckey RC. Progesterone synthesis by the human placenta. Placenta. 2005;26(4):273–81. Epub 2005/04/13. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.06.012 15823613.

45. Catov JM, Ness RB, Wellons MF, Jacobs DR, Roberts JM, Gunderson EP. Prepregnancy lipids related to preterm birth risk: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3711–8. Epub 2010/05/27. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2028 20501685; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2913035.

46. Edison RJ, Berg K, Remaley A, Kelley R, Rotimi C, Stevenson RE, et al. Adverse birth outcome among mothers with low serum cholesterol. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):723–33. Epub 2007/10/03. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1939 17908758.

47. Alleman BW, Smith AR, Byers HM, Bedell B, Ryckman KK, Murray JC, et al. A proposed method to predict preterm birth using clinical data, standard maternal serum screening, and cholesterol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):472 e1-11. Epub 2013/03/19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.005 23500456; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3765002.

48. Crump C, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA. Gestational age at birth and mortality in young adulthood. JAMA. 2011;306(11):1233–40. Epub 2011/09/22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1331 21934056.

49. Crump C. Medical history taking in adults should include questions about preterm birth. BMJ. 2014;349:g4860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4860 25085466.

50. Crump C. Birth history is forever: implications for family medicine. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(1):121–3. Epub 2015/01/09. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.130317 25567832.

51. Crump C, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Adult outcomes of preterm birth. Prev Med. 2016;91:400–1. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.024 27539070.