Light affects tissue patterning of the hypocotyl in the shade-avoidance response
Authors:
Esther Botterweg-Paredes aff001; Anko Blaakmeer aff001; Shin-Young Hong aff001; Bin Sun aff001; Lorenzo Mineri aff001; Valdeko Kruusvee aff001; Yakun Xie aff004; Daniel Straub aff005; Delphine Ménard aff007; Edouard Pesquet aff007; Stephan Wenkel aff001
Authors place of work:
Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej, Denmark
aff001; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
aff002; NovoCrops Center, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej, Denmark
aff002; Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
aff003; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
aff003; Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Germany
aff004; Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
aff004; Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle, Tübingen, Germany
aff005; Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Germany
aff005; Microbial Ecology, Center for Applied Geoscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
aff006; Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle, Tuebingen, Germany
aff006; Arrhenius Laboratories, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences (DEEP), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
aff007; Microbial Ecology, Center for Applied Geoscience, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany
aff007; NovoCrops Center, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej, Denmark
aff008; Arrhenius Laboratories, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences (DEEP), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
aff008
Published in the journal:
Light affects tissue patterning of the hypocotyl in the shade-avoidance response. PLoS Genet 16(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008678
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008678
Summary
Plants have evolved strategies to avoid shade and optimize the capture of sunlight. While some species are tolerant to shade, plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana are shade-intolerant and induce elongation of their hypocotyl to outcompete neighboring plants. We report the identification of a developmental module acting downstream of shade perception controlling vascular patterning. We show that Arabidopsis plants react to shade by increasing the number and types of water-conducting tracheary elements in the vascular cylinder to maintain vascular density constant. Mutations in genes affecting vascular patterning impair the production of additional xylem and also show defects in the shade-induced hypocotyl elongation response. Comparative analysis of the shade-induced transcriptomes revealed differences between wild type and vascular patterning mutants and it appears that the latter mutants fail to induce sets of genes encoding biosynthetic and cell wall modifying enzymes. Our results thus set the stage for a deeper understanding of how growth and patterning are coordinated in a dynamic environment.
Keywords:
Gene expression – Transcription factors – Genetically modified plants – Seedlings – Arabidopsis thaliana – Auxins – Hypocotyl – White light
Introduction
Shade intolerant plants such as Arabidopsis respond to subtle changes in the red (R) to far-red (FR) light ratio (R:FR) by increasing hypocotyl elongation growth to outcompete shade caused by neighboring plants. When shaded, several key transcription factors change rapidly to induce transcriptional signaling cascade(s) impinging on genes encoding components of auxin production and signaling [1–4]. This rapid response relies on the activity of the phytochrome photoreceptor system in which PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs) form the first layer downstream of PHYTOCHROME B (PHYB). In white light conditions, when the R:FR ratio is high, PHYB is active in the nucleus where it maintains the continuous degradation of PIF transcription factors [5]. In shade, the R:FR ratio is low, which inactivates PHYB and thus increases the half-life of PIFs, mainly PIF3, PIF4 and PIF7, to activate genes encoding auxin biosynthesis enzymes [6]. Among the auxin biosynthesis enzymes required for a full shade avoidance response, TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE OF ARABIDOPSIS1 (TAA1) and different members of the YUCCA family produce auxin directly from tryptophan in a shade-responsive manner [7–9]. In addition to PIFs, genes encoding class II homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-ZIPII) transcription factors, especially HAT1, HAT2, HAT3, HAT4/ATHB2 and ATHB4, are also rapidly induced in response to a low R:FR ratio [2, 10–12] partially mediated by PIFs [13, 14]. These HD-ZIPII transcription factors have an N-terminal EAR motif used to form transcriptional repressor complexes with TOPLESS/TOPLESS-related co-repressors [15]. In fact, ATHB4 acts as a transcriptional repressor on targets such as the YUCCA5 gene encoding an auxin biosynthetic enzyme [16]. The complex regulation of YUCCA5 supports the idea that HD-ZIPIIs impede auxin production to dampen PIF function and avoid excessive auxin-dependent growth. At the initiation of the shade-induced elongation growth, recent genetic studies revealed a decisive role of the hypocotyl epidermis in the production and dissipation of auxin signaling [17]. It however remains unknown whether the different hypocotyl cell-types divide, elongate and/or differentiate to enable the shade-dependent growth. Genome-wide transcription factor binding site studies focusing on the master patterning factors of the class III homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-ZIPIII) as well as on KANADI families revealed several direct target genes with known roles in the shade avoidance response [18–20]. Interestingly, these HD-ZIPIII proteins also interact with the rapid shade-response HD-ZIPII transcription factors to regulate leaf patterning [21–23].
Here we show that the HD-ZIPIII transcription factor REVOLUTA (REV) and the KANADI transcriptional repressor KANADI1 (KAN1) impinge on the transcriptional regulation of the WUSCHEL RELATED HOMEOBOX 4 (WOX4) transcription factor that acts as a master regulator of (pro)cambium maintenance. In response to shade, Arabidopsis seedlings induce hypocotyl growth (extended elongation and limited girth increase) which is accompanied by an increase in tracheary elements (TEs), these xylem cells provide both axial mechanical support as well as function in hydro-mineral sap conduction. Both numbers and types of TEs changed with shading, inducing the formation of more metaxylem-type TEs characterized by larger luminal diameter and reticulate/pitted cell wall organization. Plants with mutations in either REV, KAN1 or WOX4 showed defects in hypocotyl elongation and were unable to increase the number of TEs in the vascular cylinder. Moreover, the xylem patterning response that we have observed extends beyond Arabidopsis and together with additional in vitro data, we have uncovered a transcriptional circuitry that controls environment-sensitive cell fate transitions governing plant plasticity to respond to shade.
Results
WOX4 is a direct REVOLUTA and KANADI1 target gene
Using ChIP-seq, we previously identified genome-wide binding sites for the HD-ZIPIII transcription factor REVOLUTA (REV) and the GARP-type transcription factor KANADI1 (KAN1) [18, 19]. Both REV and KAN1 antagonistically regulate patterning of early leaf primordia: in this context REV determines the adaxial (future upper) and KAN1 the abaxial (future lower) side of the developing leaf. Comparative studies combining ChIP- and mRNA-sequencing as well as microarray-based technologies revealed a number of targets directly regulated REV and KAN1 [18–20, 24, 25], several of which have known roles in the shade avoidance response. The transcription factor WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 (WOX4) was among the genes that are directly and oppositely regulated by REV and KAN1. Our ChIP-seq data showed two binding peaks for KAN1 (-1.0kb and -4.0kb) upstream of the transcription start site while REV showed only one peak (-4.0kb upstream) indicating that REV and KAN1 could compete for chromatin access at the more distant position (Fig 1A). We verified the binding of REV and KAN1 to these respective positions by performing independent ChIP-qPCRs and tested a region further upstream as a negative control (Fig 1B). Transgenic plants expressing fusions of REV or KAN1 to the glucocorticoid receptor exhibited robust changes of WOX4 mRNA levels when treated with dexamethasone: REV induced while KAN1 repressed WOX4 expression (Fig 1C). This confirmed that REV acts predominantly as a transcriptional activator and KAN1 as a transcriptional repressor [18–20, 24, 25]. Finally, we assessed the levels of WOX4 mRNA in different rev and kan mutants: plants with reduced REV or HD-ZIPIII levels such MIR165a-OX, exhibited significantly lower levels of WOX4 mRNA whereas plants with either a REV gain-of-function mutation (rev10D) or mutated in KAN1 and KAN2 (kan1 kan2) had significantly increased levels of WOX4 mRNA (Fig 1D). Taken together, these findings support a role for REV and KAN1 as direct upstream regulators of WOX4.
Early preliminary studies revealed a reduction of the procambial layer in the vascular bundles of petioles when plants were grown in shade (S1 Fig), leading us to investigate the relationship between vascular patterning and shade growth. WOX4 is an important regulator of (pro)cambial identity in the plant vasculature [26–28]. (Pro)cambium cells have stem cell properties and can differentiate into tracheary elements, which both allow mechanical support and water-conduction, and are essential to form wood in perennial plants. Loss of WOX4 causes a strong reduction of cambium formation in Arabidopsis [28] and a strong reduction in girth of the main stem in poplar [29].
Using histological analysis of the stem bases, we investigated if REV and WOX4 genetically interacted to regulate (pro)cambium development in Col-0 wild type, 35S::WOX4, rev5, wox4 and rev5 wox4 mutant plants (S2 Fig). Compared to Col-0 wild type plants, no significant vascular changes were observed in transgenic 35S::WOX4 plants (S2 Fig) whereas wox4 mutant plants displayed, as previously reported, a significant reduction in the amount of cambium/forming xylem (S2 Fig). In contrast, rev5 mutants showed deformed, flattened vascular bundles but no visible reduction in cambium (S2 Fig). The wox4 rev5 double mutant cumulatively showed both reduced cambium as well as deformed and flattened vascular bundles together with an increase in tissue surrounding the vasculature (S2 Fig). Thus, it seems, that the latter effects are additive and do not point towards a genetic interaction of the REV and WOX4 pathways in controlling cambium maintenance in the main stem. In summary, these observations suggest that WOX4 expression is regulated by REV and KAN1 but this regulation is not important for the vascular patterning of the main stem.
Loss of WOX4 function affects the shade avoidance response
Previous research had revealed that mutations in both REV and KAN1 displayed reduced hypocotyl elongation in response to shade [18, 20, 30]. We therefore tested the hypocotyl elongation response of wox4 mutant plants grown in white light (WL) and far-red enriched WL conditions (WL+FR) to simulate shade and trigger the shade avoidance response. We found that wox4 mutants are indeed impaired in responding to shade and showed an even greater impairment of hypocotyl elongation than rev-5 mutant plants (Fig 2A). As Arabidopsis plants require auxin production to respond to shade, loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding the auxin biosynthesis enzyme TAA1 are almost completely insensitive to shade [8, 31, 32]. Using our experimental set-up, taa1 mutant hypocotyls did not elongate when grown in WL+FR compared to WL conditions (Fig 2A). Similarly, to wox4 and rev-5 mutants, taa1 mutants were indistinguishable from wild type plants, with respect to the length of the hypocotyl, when grown in WL conditions (Fig 2A). We also tested the response of wox4 rev-5 double mutants in WL and WL+FR and found that respective double mutants resembled the wox4 single mutant, indicating a redundant control of shade-induced growth (Fig 2A). Higher order mutations in KANADI genes, as in the kan1 kan2 double mutant, also affected elongation growth, and these mutants displayed longer hypocotyls in WL conditions and shorter hypocotyls in WL+FR compared to the wild type (Fig 2A). In combination with wox4, wox4 kan1 kan2 triple mutants had longer hypocotyls in WL when compared to the wild type, but elongated to a far lesser extent, when considering the absolute extension (subtraction of the length of the hypocotyl in WL from the length observed in WL+FR, Fig 2B). We confirmed that the changes in hypocotyl length we had observed were statistically significant, by performing two-way ANOVA analysis with all data (S3 Fig). The fact that WOX4, KAN1 and KAN2 encode transcriptional repressors, suggests that the expression of many target genes will be unleashed in wox4 kan1 kan2 triple mutant plants and some of these de-repressed targets likely promote hypocotyl elongation in a synergistic fashion. Taken together, our findings indicated that REV and KAN1, KAN2 together with WOX4 are all required for an effective response to shade.
HD-ZIPIII activity is controlled at the post-translational level by the LITTLE ZIPPER3 (ZPR3) microProtein and plants overexpressing ZPR3 are almost insensitive to shade with respect to their hypocotyl elongation ability [18]. We wondered if the role of WOX4 in the shade response could be related to the activity of the shoot apical meristem. Mutations in the gene encoding the WUSCHEL (WUS) transcription factor (here wus-1) showed a shoot meristem-less phenotype but when grown in shade conditions were able to induce hypocotyl growth comparable to wild type plants (S4 Fig). In comparison, transgenic 35S::ZPR3 plants showed a high frequency of shoot meristem arrests and the fraction of shoot meristem-less transgenic plants were strongly impaired in their ability to elongate the hypocotyl (S4 Fig). These findings indicated that a functional active shoot meristem was not required for the shade dependent hypocotyl elongation response, suggesting that HD-ZIPIII-mediated cell-fate changes within the hypocotyl might enable growth.
Role of the REV/KAN1/WOX4 module in shade-mediated tissue patterning
Given the role of WOX4 in (pro)cambial cell proliferation [27, 28], it is conceivable that the dampened growth response of wox4 mutant seedlings is caused by changes in vascular patterning. REV and KAN1, KAN2 have previously been implicated in vascular patterning as well [33–36] and we thus asked whether mutations in these genes would affect vascular responses in shade. We performed histological analyses to test whether we could observe differences in the vasculature of hypocotyls grown in WL and shade (WL+FR) conditions. When exposed to shade, Col-0 wild type plants displayed a highly reproducible increase in the number of tracheary elements in the vascular cylinder (Fig 3A and 3B). This increase also occurred in taa1 mutant plants although the number of tracheary elements was strongly reduced compared to Col-0 wild type plants. Mutant plants wox4, rev-5 and wox4 rev-5 all exhibited a higher number of tracheary elements in WL conditions with only a moderate increase in WL+FR compared to Col-0 wild type plants (Fig 3A and 3B). We also examined kan1 kan2 double and wox4 kan1 kan2 triple mutants which all had more tracheary elements than the wild type in WL but showed no increase in WL+FR (Fig 3A–3C). The supernumerary tracheary elements appearing in response to shade in Col-0 wild type plants presented larger diameters/lumens (Fig 3A), suggesting that metaxylem-type cells were formed. These findings suggested that the increased production of tracheary elements was associated with hypocotyl elongation to confer a maximal shade avoidance response. To verify that the changes in tracheary element numbers we had observed were statistically significant, we performed two-way ANOVA analysis with all data shown in Fig 3 (S5 Fig). This analysis revealed that the observed changes in Col-0, rev5, wox4 and wox4 rev5 are significant (p-values between 0.05 and 0.001) and genotypes responded differently to treatments (ANOVA interaction term p-value <0.05). The comparisons of TE numbers in WL and WL+FR in kan1 kan2 and wox4 kan1 kan2 revealed no significant differences.
In Arabidopsis, phytochrome B is the major photoreceptor that in WL conditions represses hypocotyl elongation. Hence, mutations in PHYB result in a constitutive long hypocotyl phenotype [11]. We tested if the shade-insensitive phyB-9 mutant plants, which do not elongate their hypocotyls in shade, would also be impaired in increasing tracheary element numbers. In agreement with our previous findings, we observed no supernumerary tracheary elements or changes in diameter/lumen in phyB-9 mutant plants indicating that PHYB operates upstream of the REV/KAN1/WOX4 patterning module (S6 Fig).
To verify that the elongation defects we observed were not related to a general inability of vascular patterning mutants to elongate the hypocotyl, we investigated the role of brassinolide (BL) in promoting elongation growth. We grew wild type and mutant plants in white light conditions on plates containing either regular MS medium or MS with additional BL. As expected, all plants reacted to BL and showed hypocotyl elongation responses. The analysis of the vasculature revealed no increase in tracheary element numbers or diameter/lumen (S7 Fig). These findings revealed that the increase in tracheary element numbers and diameter/lumen is shade-induced and not required for elongation responses per se.
Several observations demonstrate that REV and WOX4 are required for a full shade avoidance response. First, we find that mutations in respective genes show a reduced hypocotyl elongation response (Fig 2A and 2B) and second, the mutants also fail to increase the number of TEs in response to shading (Fig 3A–3C). To test if shade-derived signals are not properly transported through the vascular system of rev-5 and wox4 mutant plants, we performed a 24-hour shade experiment. In this experiment, we exposed Col-0 wild type, rev-5, wox4, kan1 kan2 and taa1 mutants to WL+FR and determined hypocotyl growth after 24 hours. We found that all plants responded similar to WL+FR treatment and extended their hypocotyls except taa1 mutant plants that only extended their hypocotyls weakly (S7 Fig). These findings indicate that rev-5 and wox4 mutant plants have no defect in detecting and responding to shade but fail to strongly elongate their hypocotyls in persistent shade.
To further investigate the shade-induced vascular changes, we performed whole plant tomography experiments and virtually sectioned hypocotyls using confocal microscopy. In agreement with our histological analysis, we found that in wild type plants the increase of tracheary elements in the vascular cylinder of the hypocotyl in response to shade was associated with the appearance of pitted tracheary elements absent form WL (Fig 4A and S1 Movie). To evaluate how the supernumerary tracheary elements affected the overall hypocotyl structure in response to shade, tissue proportion analysis was performed using whole plant tomography in wild type, wox4 and rev5 to define if shade-dependent elongation altered the vascular density of plant tissue. Although significant increases could be detected for all genotypes tested between WL and WL+FR with regard to hypocotyl elongation, vascular density was unaltered in WL conditions but reduced in wox4 and rev5 specifically under WL+FR conditions (Fig 4B). This suggests that the increased tracheary element formation in response to shade is to maintain constant vascular density. The capacity of wox4 and rev5 to increase vascular density was reduced which was likely a result of lower vascular formation. In summary, our findings showed that long-term shading changed the composition of the vascular cylinder inside the hypocotyl resulting in an increased number of tracheary elements with larger diameter/lumen and different secondary cell wall organization to ensure that the vascular density of plant tissues are maintained. Mutations in either REV, WOX4 or KAN1 and KAN2 genes caused a decrease in the plant capacity to increase the tracheary elements necessary to maintain the constant vascular density, thus demonstrating that these genes act as adaptive factors controlling the response to shade.
Analysis of shade-induced vascular changes in crop plants
To further understand if the observed increase of tracheary elements in response to shade occurs only in Arabidopsis or can also be seen in other species, we decided to investigate different shade-sensitive food crops. For this, we tested tomato, carrot and dill seedlings, germinated them in WL and performed growth assays in WL and WL+FR conditions. In these experiments, we found that tomato, dill and carrot showed significant hypocotyl elongation responses, when grown in WL+FR conditions (S8 Fig). Histology of the hypocotyls revealed that tomato plants showed shade-related changes in vascular organization and shade treated plants produced around 20% more tracheary elements compared to the white light grown plants (S8 Fig). The supernumerary tracheary elements appearing in response to shade also presented larger diameters/lumens in tomato (S8 Fig). Similar changes were also observed in carrot seedlings that also showed a significant increase in tracheary elements in response to shading (S8 Fig). Dill seedlings showed hypocotyl elongation in response to shade but the number of tracheary elements was the same in WL and WL+FR (S8 Fig). These results indicated that the effect of increasing the number and size of tracheary elements in the hypocotyl of shade-responsive plants was not restricted to Arabidopsis and also occurred in economically important plants. The finding that not all species that responded to shade also showed extra tracheary elements indicated that species-specific plasticity responses exist.
Analysis of differential gene expression in vascular patterning mutants in white light and shade
Based on the response to shade, we found that REV and WOX4 genetically interact to promote growth in response to increased far-red light. To characterize respective mutants at the molecular level, we performed RNAseq to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We found 140 DEGs in rev-5 and 22 in wox4 mutant plants. To assess which processes are mainly regulated by REV and WOX4, we performed gene ontology analyses with the individual sets of DEGs. Specifically, we found that DEGs in the rev-5 mutant were related to secondary metabolism and responses to stress while the analysis of the 22 DEGs in wox4 yielded no GO enrichment (S9 Fig). A comparison of the overlaps between the individual sets of DEGs revealed eleven genes that were upregulated in both rev-5 and wox4 mutants compared to wild type plants. Among these eleven upregulated transcripts we found the TRACHEARY ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION RELATED7 (TED7) gene that plays a role in TE differentiation [37].
We next analyzed the changes of the transcriptomes of rev-5 and wox4 mutants when exposed to shade. As before, plants were cultivated for two days in white light conditions and then cultivated for an additional eight days in WL+FR. Transcriptome changes were compared to the control group of plants that was cultivated in WL for the entire ten days. To identify shade de-regulated genes globally, we compared the RNA-seq datasets using DESeq2 and used Col-0 as a reference (S1 Data). This analysis revealed in total 965 genes significantly deregulated transcripts in rev-5 mutant plants and 401 in wox4 mutants with an overlap of 195 genes (Fig 5A). Principle component analysis revealed that individual replicates grouped close together suggesting a high reproducibility of the data (Fig 5B). A more detailed analysis of de-regulated genes, especially the 195 genes that were found to be deregulated in all genotypes compared to wild type, revealed several genes encoding glucosinolate biosynthesis enzymes, cell wall modifying enzymes and genes involved in photosynthesis (S2 Data). This finding indicates that these mutants might also differ from wild type with regard to their metabolism and cell wall biochemistry. Investigation of specific transcripts that were differentially expressed in wox4 and rev-5 mutants showed that the TED7 transcript is shade sensitive and expressed at higher levels in white light conditions in the two mutants. The gene encoding the QUA-QUINE STARCH enzyme was expressed at lower levels in wox4 and higher levels in rev-5 and in both genotypes the expression was no longer shade-inducible (Fig 5C). The CYP450 enzyme (AT4G31970) was ectopically high in both wox4 and rev-5 mutant plants (Fig 5C). Thus, the inability to induce genes in response to shade can result from elevated expression in white light conditions or a repression in shade.
Far-red light has a transformative effect on in vitro inducible cell suspensions
Our work uncovered shade-induced changes mediated by a small set of patterning factors to promote the differentiation of cells into tracheary elements in whole seedlings. To elucidate whether far-red light itself possessed a transformative capacity, we investigated the effect of far-red irradiation on in vitro grown inducible hormone-habituated Arabidopsis cell suspension cultures. Addition of auxin, brassinosteroids and cytokinin in a specific ratio triggered the trans-differentiation of the actively dividing parenchyma into tracheary elements [38] which have the characteristic secondary cell wall patterns that can be recognized under a regular light microscope (S10 Fig) [39]. We investigated the influence of light quality on hormonal induction of xylogenesis and cell division. In response to white light, xylogenic induction was slightly reduced compared to induction in the dark or in white light supplemented with far-red light (S10 Fig) indicating that WL, or a high R:FR ratio suppressed xylogenesis. In contrast, WL also stimulated cell division compared to the dark and WL+FR (S10 Fig). In all conditions, the kinetics of tracheary element formation was not affected with cell differentiation starting at day 3 and plateauing by day 5. Interestingly, tracheary element cell wall organization changed with light conditions as WL+FR promoted reticulate-type tracheary elements in comparison to WL and dark. We were surprised to find that in the absence of the inducing hormone cocktail, far-red enriched light had a significant transformative capacity resulting in an increased frequency of spontaneous xylogenesis (S10 Fig). The latter effect was independent of increases in cell division (S10 Fig). These results complemented our previous findings by confirming that shade directly affected the vascular formation by promoting the differentiation of metaxylem tracheary elements. Moreover, our experiments using inducible cell cultures indicated that this shade-induced cell fate change occurred without undergoing cell division.
Discussion
Compared to animals, plant development is highly plastic and the final shape of plants is strongly influenced by the environment. In the past decades, the genetic control required to respond to environmental inputs has been in part elucidated by the study of genes encoding master regulators of development as well as genes encoding transcription factors, photoreceptors or hormone biosynthetic enzymes. Knowledge on how existing patterning networks can be influenced by external signals have so far remained scarce.
Previous research identified several shade-related direct downstream targets genes of the patterning factors REVOLUTA and KANADI1 [18, 19, 24, 25, 40]. However, the role of REV and KAN1 in the control of growth in response to shade has been enigmatic. Our studies have revealed a role for WOX4 in the control of growth in response to shade. Based on the phenotypes of loss-of-function mutants in REV (rev-5), WOX4 (wox4) and the resultant double mutant (wox4 rev-5) we observed additive phenotypes with regard to the structures of the stem vasculature (S2 Fig) and an epistatic relationship in the control of growth in response to shade. In the latter process, wox4 is epistatic over rev-5, as indicated by the wox4-like phenotype of the wox4 rev-5 double mutant (Fig 2A and 2B). The kan1 kan2 double mutant showed elongated hypocotyls in white light conditions and slightly longer hypocotyls in shade conditions but the relative growth in shade was reduced (Fig 2A and 2B). In combination with wox4, we found that wox4 kan1 kan2 mutants showed even longer hypocotyls in both shade and non-shade conditions, supporting an additive relationship. The molecular function of WOX4 is still opaque and it is unclear what its direct downstream targets are. However, it is known that WOX4 affects the sensitivity of cells to auxin [28]. KAN1, KAN2 are known transcriptional repressors and WOX4 is predicted to act as a transcriptional repressor as well. Thus, it is possible that the combination of mutations (as in wox4 kan1 kan2) unleashes auxin production and signaling and thereby causes ectopic growth.
In a situation of enhanced KAN1 expression (Fig 1C), WOX4 expression is abolished and transgenic plants overexpressing KAN1 (35S::KAN1) are completely shade insensitive [40]. However, in comparison to wox4 single mutants the growth phenotype of 35S::KAN1 is much stronger. The latter is likely attributed to KAN1 repressing a large number of target genes that are involved in hormone biology and shade-induced growth promotion [18, 19].
Importantly, with regards to their transcriptomes, rev-5 mutants had more differentially expressed genes compared to wox4 mutants (S9 Fig). Principle component analysis of the datasets revealed that rev-5 mutant plants were markedly different from wox4 and wild type plants but grouped with the different treatment categories (Fig 5B). Our analysis compared plants grown for eight days in WL+FR environment to plants grown in WL. This long-term exposure results in morphological changes such as petiole extension and leaf flattening. Some of the gene expression changes we observed might not relate to alterations in signaling but could be a consequence of above-mentioned morphological changes.
Our work revealed that Arabidopsis plants responded to shade by increasing the numbers and types of tracheary elements in the vascular cylinder of the hypocotyl to maintain a constant vascular density. Mutants that failed to increase tracheary element cell number showed reduced hypocotyl growth suggesting that plant growth adaptability depended on its capacity to maintain a constant vascular density. Analysis of genes differentially regulated in rev-5 and wox4 mutant plants revealed eleven genes that were upregulated in both mutant plants compared to Col-0 wild type plants (S9 Fig). This dataset comprised mostly uncharacterized enzymes and TED7.
To validate the findings that vascular patterning mutants showed less TE expansion in shade, we carried out a differential phenotype to genotype association analysis. Specifically, we determined if the observed changes in hypocotyl length and tracheary element increase were interdependent. We displayed the relative changes by dividing the length of the hypocotyl in WL with the length observed in WL+FR conditions plotted against the relative changes in tracheary elements. For the latter, we again divided the cell number in WL with the cell number in WL+FR. This analysis yielded direct associations between the relative length of the hypocotyl in relation to the relative increase of tracheary element numbers in shade conditions. Arabidopsis wild type plants which showed both a high plasticity in hypocotyl expansion and had increased numbers of tracheary elements, clustered as expected in the upper right corner of the diagram (Fig 6A). The rev-5 mutant clustered in the middle of the diagram showing a weaker hypocotyl response and a slight increase in the numbers of tracheary elements in shade conditions. The taa1 mutant clustered in the bottom right corner because it showed a relative increase in the number of tracheary elements in response to shading but failed to elongate the hypocotyl. All other mutants analyzed in this study clustered in the bottom left section of the diagram indicative of a dampened hypocotyl elongation response and concomitant failure to increase the number of tracheary elements in response to shade conditions. These results show that patterning factors of the HD-ZIPIII and KANADI families, including their direct downstream targets such as WOX4 and TAA1, are required to promote shade-induced growth. To exclude a general defect of vascular patterning mutants to increase elongation growth we studied the effect of BL of inducing elongation growth and TE expansion (S7 Fig). We neither found an effect of BL in inducing TE expansion, nor were vascular patterning mutants impaired in their response to BL. Finally, the differential phenotype to genotype association analysis of the BL effect showed no major deviation of taa1 and wox4 mutant plants from the growth behavior of wild type plants (S11 Fig).
The shade avoidance response is a major determinant of how dense crops can be grown in a field. It is an undesirable trait because shade-sensitive plants redistribute resources from contributing to yield to sustaining excessive elongation growth [41]. Thus, a deeper understanding of the underlying transcription factor networks, hormonal networks and physiological responses will help to design future crops with uncoupled or dampened shade responses. We propose that in response to shade, a vascular patterning module composed of REV, KAN1 and WOX4 and maybe redundant transcription factors of these gene families, initiates differentiation inside the vascular cylinder leading to an increase in the number of tracheary elements (Fig 6B). The failure to strongly increase tracheary elements in shade could be related to reduced (pro)cambial proliferation of wox4 mutant plants. We further showed that the increase of differentiation into tracheary elements occurs without the need for additional cell division, and that FR itself could promote cell trans-differentiation independently of auxin surplus (S10 Fig). As the observed increase in xylem maintains a constant vascular density, this might help in facilitating elongation growth by keeping surrounding tissues constantly hydrated. Furthermore, additional metaxylem-type tracheary elements with denser secondary cell walls might also add structural support for the extended hypocotyl.
In summary, our findings show that patterning factors direct changes in the organization of the vascular cylinder in response to shade. The contribution of these changes to the hypocotyl elongation response remains opaque because of the uncoupling of shade-regulated genes in the patterning mutants studied here. It is possible that some of the shade-regulated genes contribute to the vascular changes that we have identified but it is equally possible that parallel pathways are affected that contribute to elongation growth. Additional tissue-specific analysis of how the signal is perceived and transmitted will be required to elucidate further factors and their interconnections to fully understand the shade-induced differentiation response that we have uncovered.
Materials & methods
Plant material, treatments, and hypocotyl measurements
Mutant and transgenic plants that were used in this study have been described earlier: kan1 kan2 [40]; rev-5 (A260V) [42]; wox4 (wox4-1, GABI_KAT_462GO1) [28]; taa1 [8]; wus-1 [43]; MIR165a-OX [44]; ZPR3-OX [45].
For histological analysis and hypocotyl measurements, wild-type and mutant plants were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with vitamins, in a growth chamber (CLF Plant Climatics. model: SE-41LAR2) with continuous white light (Philips (master) TL-D 18W/840 5A) for 7 days (10 days for histological analysis), at 22°C. For shade avoidance conditions, 2-day old plants grown in white light were transferred to a far-red enriched compartment for 5 days (8 days for histological analysis). The WL+FR compartment was equipped with additional FR-LEDs (GroLED_N 20150409-TZI). Additional light parameters: PAR: 13 μmol/m2/s (in both WL and WL+FR). R/FR in WL: 7.7; in WL+FR: 0.2.
For hypocotyl measurements, seedlings were photographed and hypocotyls measured using IMAGEJ. Two-way ANOVA was performed using the software R (version 3.6.1, R Core Team, 2017).
For ChIP experiments and gene expression analysis, Col-0, and both 35S::FLAG-GR-REVd and 35S::FLAG-GR-KAN1 transgenic plants were grown in liquid MS medium supplemented with vitamins for 15 days in continuous light and induced with 25 μM dexamethasone (DEX) for 60 min (35S::FLAG-GR-REVd) or 120 min (35S::FLAG-GR-KAN1) prior to harvesting.
Histological analysis of hypocotyls
10-day old Arabidopsis seedlings were vacuum-infiltrated for 15 minutes, fixed for four hours in Karnovsky’s Fixative, and embedded in resin, according to Spurr’s procedure (Spurr, 1969). Hypocotyls were sectioned (2 μm) on a SuperNova Reichert-Jung microtome, stained with Toluidine Blue-O 0.05%, pH 4.4, and visualized in bright field using a Nikon Eclipse 80i Fluorescence microscope. TE elements were counted and two-way ANOVA was performed using the software R (version 3.6.1, R Core Team, 2017).
Whole-seedling tomography
10-day old Arabidopsis seedlings were fixed in 70% ethanol overnight and cleared using 10% NaOH solution at 60°C for 14 h. Cleared seedling were then staining with an 0.01% basic Fuchsin solution (857343, Sigma-Aldrich) in water for 1 h at 60°C, washed twice in water and mounted between glass and coverslip in 50% glycerol. Whole seedling tomography was then acquired using LSM510 meta confocal microscope (Zeiss, Sweden) equipped with an automated xyz stage, long working distance 20x objective and image stitching option. Whole seedling tomography resulted from stitching 50–60 xyz confocal stacks of 20–25 xy images (1024x1024 pixels) separated by 0.9 μm z averaged 3 times. Images were acquired using a 488 nm Ag laser excitation and collection emitted photon using a long pass 500 nm filter. Hypocotyl total and vascular volumes were measured by summing the respective areas in each optical section using IMAGEJ.
Inducible cell suspension cultures
Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 hormone-habituated cell suspension cultures were generated as previously described by Pesquet et al. [46]. Cell suspensions, submitted or not to xylogenic differentiation using a combination of auxin/cytokinin/brassinosteroids [38], were grown under 120 rpm orbital agitation at 25–27°C either in dark or 30 μE white light supplemented or not with far-red. After 7-days of culture, cell growth and tracheary element differentiation were measured as previously reported by Ménard et al., (2017). Similarly, tracheary element differentiation time-course and secondary cell wall organization was measured as previously reported by Derbyshire et al., (2015).
Gene expression analysis
For gene expression analysis RNA was extracted using EURx GeneMATRIX Universal RNA Purification Kit. Purified RNA (1 μg) was used for reverse transcription using ThermoScientific Revert Aid Reverse Transcriptase with oligo-dT primers. Real-time quantitative PCRs (RT-qPCR) were carried out using the ThermoScientific SYBR Green qPCR master mix on a Biorad CFX384. Gene expression levels were calculated using the delta-Ct method and a standard curve relative to GAPDH. Oligonucleotide sequences are listed in S1 Table.
RNAseq analysis
Respective seedlings were grown on MS plates for two days in white light conditions and then a fraction was transferred to a white light compartment with additional far-red light for eight days. RNA from two biological replicates were extracted for each genotype and treatment as described earlier and Illumina sequencing libraries were constructed (TruSeq) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform (Novogene, Hongkong). Between 21 and 24 million read pairs per sample were obtained. Paired-end reads were loaded into Galaxy version 15.05.rc1 [47–49], and quality was assessed using FastQC (version 0.10.1). HISAT2 aligned above 85% of read pairs of each sample correctly to the Arabidopsis genome (TAIR10). To identify shade regulated transcriptome changes we used DESeq2 v1.18.1 in R v3.4.4, the interaction term for the light effect in mutant genotypes vs genotype Col-0 were calculated using the design "~ genotype + light + genotype:light" with Col-0 as reference. This tests if the light effect is different in mutant compared to Col-0. Raw data files are available through Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE137009).
ChIP-qPCR analysis
ChIP experiments were carried out as described by Kwon et al. (2005) using Col-0, and transgenic 35S::FLAG-GR-REVd and 35S::FLAG-GR-KAN1 plants. Anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads (Sigma) were used. After Cross-linking, DNA was purified with Qiagen MinElute PCR Purification kit. DNA was used for subsequent RT-qPCR.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [pdf]
Shade leads to a reorganization of the vasculature in petioles.
S2 Fig [pdf]
Histological analysis of the stem base of and mutant plants.
S3 Fig [pdf]
Statistical analysis of shade-induced hypocotyl responses.
S4 Fig [pdf]
Shade avoidance responses of mutants lacking a shoot apical meristem.
S5 Fig [pdf]
Statistical analysis of shade-induced tracheary element (TE) numbers.
S6 Fig [wl]
Histological analysis of shade-induced vascular patterning in wild type and mutant plants.
S7 Fig [wl]
Histological analysis of brassinolide-induced vascular patterning.
S8 Fig [wl]
Hypocotyl response to shade in selected crop plants.
S9 Fig [pdf]
Identification of differentially expressed genes in , and mutant plants.
S10 Fig [pdf]
Trans-differentiation of TEs .
S11 Fig [pdf]
Differential growth analysis of plants grown on medium +/- brassinolide.
S1 Data [xlsx]
Differentially expressed genes in shade identified using DESEq2 (WL versus WL+FR in and mutant plants using the design "~ genotype + light + genotype:light" with Col-0 as reference).
S2 Data [xlsx]
Individual and overlapping datasets of differentially expressed genes in shade.
S1 Table [xlsx]
Oligonucleotide sequences.
S1 Movie [avi]
Sample movie of Col-0 (brightfield transmission) using xyz confocal optical sectioning and 3D-reconstruction with 180-degree rotation.
Zdroje
1. Roig-Villanova I, Bou-Torrent J, Galstyan A, Carretero-Paulet L, Portoles S, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, et al. Interaction of shade avoidance and auxin responses: a role for two novel atypical bHLH proteins. Embo j. 2007;26(22):4756–67. Epub 2007/10/20. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601890 17948056; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2080812.
2. Sorin C, Salla-Martret M, Bou-Torrent J, Roig-Villanova I, Martinez-Garcia JF. ATHB4, a regulator of shade avoidance, modulates hormone response in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2009;59(2):266–77. Epub 2009/04/28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03866.x 19392702.
3. Leivar P, Tepperman JM, Cohn MM, Monte E, Al-Sady B, Erickson E, et al. Dynamic antagonism between phytochromes and PIF family basic helix-loop-helix factors induces selective reciprocal responses to light and shade in a rapidly responsive transcriptional network in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(4):1398–419. Epub 2012/04/21. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.095711 22517317; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3398554.
4. Hersch M, Lorrain S, de Wit M, Trevisan M, Ljung K, Bergmann S, et al. Light intensity modulates the regulatory network of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(17):6515–20. Epub 2014/04/16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320355111 24733935; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4035961.
5. Ni W, Xu SL, Tepperman JM, Stanley DJ, Maltby DA, Gross JD, et al. A mutually assured destruction mechanism attenuates light signaling in Arabidopsis. Science. 2014;344(6188):1160–4. Epub 2014/06/07. doi: 10.1126/science.1250778 24904166; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4414656.
6. Hornitschek P, Kohnen MV, Lorrain S, Rougemont J, Ljung K, Lopez-Vidriero I, et al. Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 control seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. Plant J. 2012;71(5):699–711. Epub 2012/04/28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05033.x 22536829.
7. Muller-Moule P, Nozue K, Pytlak ML, Palmer CM, Covington MF, Wallace AD, et al. YUCCA auxin biosynthetic genes are required for Arabidopsis shade avoidance. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2574. Epub 2016/10/21. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2574 27761349; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5068344.
8. Tao Y, Ferrer JL, Ljung K, Pojer F, Hong F, Long JA, et al. Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell. 2008;133(1):164–76. Epub 2008/04/09. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.049 18394996; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2442466.
9. Won C, Shen X, Mashiguchi K, Zheng Z, Dai X, Cheng Y, et al. Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASES OF ARABIDOPSIS and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(45):18518–23. Epub 2011/10/26. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108436108 22025721; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3215067.
10. Ciarbelli AR, Ciolfi A, Salvucci S, Ruzza V, Possenti M, Carabelli M, et al. The Arabidopsis homeodomain-leucine zipper II gene family: diversity and redundancy. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;68(4–5):465–78. Epub 2008/09/02. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9383-8 18758690.
11. Devlin PF, Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(4):1617–29. Epub 2003/12/03. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.034397 14645734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC300718.
12. Carabelli M, Sessa G, Baima S, Morelli G, Ruberti I. The Arabidopsis Athb-2 and -4 genes are strongly induced by far-red-rich light. Plant J. 1993;4(3):469–79. Epub 1993/09/01. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04030469.x 8106086.
13. Lorrain S, Allen T, Duek PD, Whitelam GC, Fankhauser C. Phytochrome-mediated inhibition of shade avoidance involves degradation of growth-promoting bHLH transcription factors. Plant J. 2008;53(2):312–23. Epub 2007/12/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03341.x 18047474.
14. Li L, Ljung K, Breton G, Schmitz RJ, Pruneda-Paz J, Cowing-Zitron C, et al. Linking photoreceptor excitation to changes in plant architecture. Genes & Development. 2012;26(8):785–90. doi: 10.1101/gad.187849.112 22508725
15. Causier B, Ashworth M, Guo W, Davies B. The TOPLESS Interactome: A Framework for Gene Repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2012;158(1):423–38. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.186999 22065421
16. Gallemi M, Molina-Contreras MJ, Paulisic S, Salla-Martret M, Sorin C, Godoy M, et al. A non-DNA-binding activity for the ATHB4 transcription factor in the control of vegetation proximity. New Phytol. 2017;216(3):798–813. Epub 2017/08/15. doi: 10.1111/nph.14727 28805249.
17. Procko C, Burko Y, Jaillais Y, Ljung K, Long JA, Chory J. The epidermis coordinates auxin-induced stem growth in response to shade. Genes Dev. 2016;30(13):1529–41. Epub 2016/07/13. doi: 10.1101/gad.283234.116 27401556; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4949326.
18. Brandt R, Salla-Martret M, Bou-Torrent J, Musielak T, Stahl M, Lanz C, et al. Genome-wide binding-site analysis of REVOLUTA reveals a link between leaf patterning and light-mediated growth responses. Plant J. 2012;72(1):31–42. Epub 2012/05/15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05049.x 22578006.
19. Merelo P, Xie Y, Brand L, Ott F, Weigel D, Bowman JL, et al. Genome-wide identification of KANADI1 target genes. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77341. Epub 2013/10/25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077341 24155946; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3796457.
20. Xie Y, Straub D, Eguen T, Brandt R, Stahl M, Martinez-Garcia JF, et al. Meta-analysis of Arabidopsis KANADI1 direct target genes identifies basic growth-promoting module acting upstream of hormonal signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2015. Epub 2015/08/08. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00764 26246448.
21. Bou-Torrent J, Salla-Martret M, Brandt R, Musielak T, Palauqui JC, Martinez-Garcia JF, et al. ATHB4 and HAT3, two class II HD-ZIP transcription factors, control leaf development in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(11):1382–7. Epub 2012/08/25. doi: 10.4161/psb.21824 22918502; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3548853.
22. Turchi L, Baima S, Morelli G, Ruberti I. Interplay of HD-Zip II and III transcription factors in auxin-regulated plant development. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(16):5043–53. Epub 2015/04/26. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv174 25911742.
23. Merelo P, Ram H, Pia Caggiano M, Ohno C, Ott F, Straub D, et al. Regulation of MIR165/166 by class II and class III homeodomain leucine zipper proteins establishes leaf polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(42):11973–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516110113 27698117
24. Reinhart BJ, Liu T, Newell NR, Magnani E, Huang T, Kerstetter R, et al. Establishing a framework for the Ad/abaxial regulatory network of Arabidopsis: ascertaining targets of class III homeodomain leucine zipper and KANADI regulation. Plant Cell. 2013;25(9):3228–49. Epub 2013/10/01. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111518 24076978; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3809529.
25. Huang T, Harrar Y, Lin C, Reinhart B, Newell NR, Talavera-Rauh F, et al. Arabidopsis KANADI1 acts as a transcriptional repressor by interacting with a specific cis-element and regulates auxin biosynthesis, transport, and signaling in opposition to HD-ZIPIII factors. Plant Cell. 2014;26(1):246–62. Epub 2014/01/28. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111526 24464295; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3963573.
26. Dolzblasz A, Nardmann J, Clerici E, Causier B, van der Graaff E, Chen J, et al. Stem Cell Regulation by Arabidopsis WOX Genes. Mol Plant. 2016;9(7):1028–39. Epub 2016/04/26. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.007 27109605.
27. Ji J, Strable J, Shimizu R, Koenig D, Sinha N, Scanlon MJ. WOX4 promotes procambial development. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(3):1346–56. Epub 2010/01/02. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149641 20044450; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2832261.
28. Suer S, Agusti J, Sanchez P, Schwarz M, Greb T. WOX4 imparts auxin responsiveness to cambium cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23(9):3247–59. Epub 2011/09/20. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.087874 21926336; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3203433.
29. Kucukoglu M, Nilsson J, Zheng B, Chaabouni S, Nilsson O. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 (WOX4)-like genes regulate cambial cell division activity and secondary growth in Populus trees. New Phytol. 2017;215(2):642–57. Epub 2017/06/14. doi: 10.1111/nph.14631 28609015.
30. Baima S, Forte V, Possenti M, Penalosa A, Leoni G, Salvi S, et al. Negative feedback regulation of auxin signaling by ATHB8/ACL5-BUD2 transcription module. Mol Plant. 2014;7(6):1006–25. Epub 2014/04/30. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu051 24777988.
31. Stepanova AN, Robertson-Hoyt J, Yun J, Benavente LM, Xie D-Y, Dolezal K, et al. TAA1-Mediated Auxin Biosynthesis Is Essential for Hormone Crosstalk and Plant Development. Cell. 2008;133(1):177–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.047 18394997
32. Yamada M, Greenham K, Prigge MJ, Jensen PJ, Estelle M. The TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE2 Gene Is Required for Auxin Synthesis and Diverse Aspects of Plant Development. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(1):168–79. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.138859 19625638
33. Zhong RQ, Ye ZH. amphivasal vascular bundle 1, a gain-of-function mutation of the IFL1/REV gene, is associated with alterations in the polarity of leaves, stems and carpels. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2004;45(4):369–85. WOS:000221037200002. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch051 15111711
34. Zhong RQ, Ye ZH. IFL1, a gene regulating interfascicular fiber differentiation in Arabidopsis, encodes a homeodomain-leucine zipper protein. Plant Cell. 1999;11(11):2139–52. WOS:000083980500009. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2139 10559440
35. Zhong R, Ye ZH. IFL1, a gene regulating interfascicular fiber differentiation in Arabidopsis, encodes a homeodomain-leucine zipper protein. Plant Cell. 1999;11(11):2139–52. Epub 1999/11/24. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2139 10559440; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC144121.
36. Ilegems M, Douet V, Meylan-Bettex M, Uyttewaal M, Brand L, Bowman JL, et al. Interplay of auxin, KANADI and Class III HD-ZIP transcription factors in vascular tissue formation. Development. 2010;137(6):975–84. Epub 2010/02/25. doi: 10.1242/dev.047662 20179097.
37. Endo S, Pesquet E, Yamaguchi M, Tashiro G, Sato M, Toyooka K, et al. Identifying new components participating in the secondary cell wall formation of vessel elements in zinnia and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(4):1155–65. Epub 2009/04/23. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059154 19383897; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2685625.
38. Menard D, Serk H, Decou R, Pesquet E. Establishment and Utilization of Habituated Cell Suspension Cultures for Hormone-Inducible Xylogenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1544:37–57. Epub 2017/01/05. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6722-3_4 28050827.
39. Derbyshire P, Menard D, Green P, Saalbach G, Buschmann H, Lloyd CW, et al. Proteomic Analysis of Microtubule Interacting Proteins over the Course of Xylem Tracheary Element Formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015;27(10):2709–26. Epub 2015/10/04. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00314 26432860; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4682315.
40. Xie Y, Straub D, Eguen T, Brandt R, Stahl M, Martínez-García JF, et al. Meta-Analysis of Arabidopsis KANADI1 Direct Target Genes Identifies a Basic Growth-Promoting Module Acting Upstream of Hormonal Signaling Pathways. Plant Physiology. 2015;169:1240–53. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00764 26246448
41. Ballare CL, Scopel AL, Sanchez RA. On the opportunity cost of the photosynthate invested in stem elongation reactions mediated by phytochrome. Oecologia. 1991;86(4):561–7. Epub 1991/05/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00318323 28313338.
42. Otsuga D, DeGuzman B, Prigge MJ, Drews GN, Clark SE. REVOLUTA regulates meristem initiation at lateral positions. The Plant Journal. 2001;25(2):223–36. WOS:000166980400010. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00959.x 11169198
43. Laux T, Mayer KF, Berger J, Jurgens G. The WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem integrity in Arabidopsis. Development. 1996;122(1):87–96. Epub 1996/01/01. 8565856.
44. Kim H-S, Kim SJ, Abbasi N, Bressan RA, Yun D-J, Yoo S-D, et al. The DOF transcription factor Dof5.1 influences leaf axial patterning by promoting Revoluta transcription in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 2010;64(3):524–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04346.x 20807212
45. Wenkel S, Emery J, Hou B-H, Evans MMS, Barton MK. A Feedback Regulatory Module Formed by LITTLE ZIPPER and HD-ZIPIII Genes. Plant Cell. 2007;19(11):3379–90. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055772 18055602
46. Pesquet E, Korolev AV, Calder G, Lloyd CW. The microtubule-associated protein AtMAP70-5 regulates secondary wall patterning in Arabidopsis wood cells. Curr Biol. 2010;20(8):744–9. Epub 2010/04/20. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.057 20399097.
47. Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010;Chapter 19:Unit 19.0.1–21. Epub 2010/01/14. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1910s89 20069535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4264107.
48. Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, et al. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 2005;15(10):1451–5. Epub 2005/09/20. doi: 10.1101/gr.4086505 16169926; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1240089.
49. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86. Epub 2010/08/27. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86 20738864; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2945788.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2020 Číslo 3
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
- Zkoušku z bariatrické chirurgie nejlépe složil ChatGPT-4. Za ním zůstaly Bing a Bard
- Raději si zajděte na oční! Jak souvisí citlivost zraku s rozvojem demence?
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Evidence of defined temporal expression patterns that lead a gram-negative cell out of dormancy
- The Lid/KDM5 histone demethylase complex activates a critical effector of the oocyte-to-zygote transition
- The alarmones (p)ppGpp are part of the heat shock response of Bacillus subtilis
- Modeling cancer genomic data in yeast reveals selection against ATM function during tumorigenesis