#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Fractures of the posterior malleolus as a part of complex ankle fractures: Trends in diagnosis and treatment at our institution


Authors: V. Kunc 1,2,3;  L. Kopp 1,2
Authors‘ workplace: Klinika úrazové chirurgie Fakulty zdravotnických studií Univerzity J. E. Purkyně a Krajská zdravotní, a. s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem, Česká republika 1;  Ústav anatomie, 2. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha, Česká republika 2;  Fakulta zdravotnických studií, Univerzita J. E. Purkyně, Ústí nad Labem, Česká republika 3
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2024, roč. 103, č. 5, s. 175-180.
Category: Original articles
doi: https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2024.103.5.175–180

Overview

Introduction: The management of posterior malleolus fractures has experienced notable advancements in recent years, predominantly driven by the CT-based Bartoníček-Rammelt classification. This study aims to systematically document the evolving trends in the approach to these fractures within the context of our institution.

Methods: A comprehensive retrospective analysis was undertaken involving 66 patients who underwent surgical intervention for posterior malleolus fractures at our institution during the years 2020 and 2021. Patient classification was conducted based on the Lauge-Hansen classification, with additional categorization according to the Bartoníček-Rammelt classification in instances where CT scans were performed.

Results: CT examinations were performed in 30 patients (45.45%); according to the Bartoníček-Rammelt classification they revealed type I in 2 cases, type II in 7 cases, type III in 12 cases, and type IV in 9 cases. Patients lacking specific fixation for type III posterior malleolus fractures, as per the Bartoníček-Rammelt classification, exhibited the most unfavorable treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: Our findings elucidate a progressive trend in the utilization of CT examinations between 2020 and 2021, although this escalation remained insufficient during this period. Consequently, we have intensified efforts to advocate for increased use of CT scans. The issues with not optimally treated type III fractures, as classified by Bartoníček-Rammelt, are quite clear from our study. We were surprised by how often these cases occurred, and they often led to more complications. These fractures diagnosed by CT scans were not treated optimally, as surgeons tend to be reluctant in adopting modern treatment procedures. This emphasizes the importance of ongoing and thorough education in all kinds of healthcare settings, including those that specialize in ankle and foot surgery.

Keywords:

ankle fractures – posterior malleolus – tibia fractures – AO principles – skeletal trauma


Sources
  1. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivý K, et al. Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(4):505−516. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4.
  2. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kašper Š, et al. Pathoanatomy of Maisonneuve fracture based on radiologic and CT examination. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):497−506. doi:10.1007/s00402-018-3099-2.
  3. Baumbach SF, Herterich V, Damblemont A, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment frequently restores syndesmotic stability. Injury 2019; 50(2):564−570. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.025.
  4. Boszczyk A, Fudalej M, Kwapisz S, et al. Ankle fracture – correlation of Lauge-Hansen classification and patient reported fracture mechanism. Forensic Sci Int. 2018; 282:94−100. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.023.
  5. Haraguchi N, Armiger RS. A new interpretation of the mechanism of ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):821−829. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3593-z.
  6. Rammelt S, Obruba P. An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(6):601−614. doi:10.1007/ s00068-014-0466-8.
  7. Drijfhout van Hooff CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM. Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):673−678. doi:10.1177/1071100715570895.
  8. Rammelt S, Boszczyk A. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures: a critical analysis review. J Bone Joint Surg. 2018;6(12):e7. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00209.
  9. Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. II. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations. Arch Surg. 1950;60(5):957−985.
  10. Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, et al. The ability of the Lauge-Hansen classification to predict ligament injury and mechanism in ankle fractures: an MRI study. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(4):267−272. doi:10.1097/00005131-200604000-00006.
  11. Verhage SM, Boot F, Schipper IB, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures using the posterolateral approach. Bone Joint J. 2016;98−B(6):812−817. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36497.
  12. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Posterior malleolar fractures: changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22(1):125−145. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.009.
  13. Forberger J, Sabandal PV, Platz A, et al. Posterolateral approach to the displaced posterior malleolus: Functional outcome and local morbidity. Foot Ankle Inter. 2009;30(4). doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.030.
  14. Sun C, Fei Z, Peng X, et al. Posterior locking plate fixation of Bartoníček type IV posterior malleolar fracture: A focus on die-punch fragment size. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;61(1):109−116. doi:10.1053/j. jfas.2020.08.036.
  15. Patton BK, Orfield NJ, Clements JR. Does the Lauge-Hansen injury mechanism predict posterior malleolar fracture morphology? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;61(6):1251−1254. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.02.013.
  16. Leung KH, Fang CX, Lau TW, et al. Preoperative radiography versus computed tomography for surgical planning for ankle fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2016;24(2):158−162. doi: 10.1177/1602400207.
  17. Moehring HD, Tan RT, Marder RA, et al. Ankle dislocation. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8(2):167–172. doi:10.1097/00005131-199404000-00015.
  1. Tejwani NC, Pahk B, Egol KA, et al. Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on outcome after unstable ankle fracture. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2010;69(3):666−669. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e4f81e.
  2. Ketz J, Maceroli M, McVicker Z. Is there a role for preoperative CT scans in evaluating the posterior malleolus in ankle fracture dislocations? Foot Ankle Orthop. 2016;1(1). doi:10.1177/2473011416S00212.
  3. Pino F, Soto CIB, Lagos L, et al. Reduction quality in posterior malleolar fractures using the modified posteromedial ankle approach. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022;7(4):2473011421S00881. doi:10.1177/2473011421S00881.

MUDr. Lubomír Kopp, Ph.D.
Klinika úrazové chirurgie,
Masarykova nemocnice,
Sociální péče 3316,
Ústí nad Labem
e-mail:
lubomir.kopp@kzcr.eu
ORCID: 0000-0002-3695-2711

Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#