Periurethral implants (injectables) – a neglected treatment option?
Authors:
V. Vik; R. Zachoval; M. Záleský; M. Galas
Authors‘ workplace:
Přednosta: Doc. MUDr. Roman Zachoval, Ph. D.
; Urologické oddělení Fakultní Thomayerova nemocnice s poliklinikou
Published in:
Prakt. Lék. 2007; 87(12): 720-723
Category:
Of different specialties
Overview
Urinary incontinence has a major impact on quality of life and greatly influences the physical, psychological and social comfort of all patients. The decreased incidence of urinary incontinence observed in patients following treatment with injectables, brings major improvements to the quality of life in both male and female patients. Patients can resume their normal activities soon after treatment and the side effects of the treatment are very minor compared to other surgical methods. Female patients with sphincteric insufficiency and/or hypermobility of the urethra are ideal candidates for this kind of therapy. In view of the low morbidity, patients can undergo the procedure repeatedly and in case of failure an alternative surgical option can be performed. There is little difference between the various materials that are currently used and the choice of injectables can be left to the surgeon depending on personal preference, availability and price.
Key words:
Urinary incontinence, bulking agents, injectables.
Labels
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adultsArticle was published in
General Practitioner
2007 Issue 12
Most read in this issue
- Functional systems of the human brain
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis and its complications. Retrospective 1-year analysis of 411 patients
- Intestinal tapeworms. Do they still exist? Are they still able to surprise us?
- Typical and atypical forms of Celiac disease in adults