#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Examination in Eye Clinics in the Czech Republic – Questionnaire Study


Authors: Marta Karhanová 1,2;  Zuzana Cyžová 1,2;  Zuzana Schreiberová 1,2;  Jana Kalitová 1;  Petr Mlčák 1,2;  Silvie Kalábová 1,2;  Eva Mlčáková 1;  Klára Marešová 1,2
Authors‘ workplace: Oční klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc 1;  Oční klinika, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci 2
Published in: Čes. a slov. Oftal., 80, 2024, No. 2, p. 103-113
Category: Original Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.31348/2024/15

Overview

Purpose: The aim of the study was to map the behavior of ophthalmologists regarding protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic (coronavirus disease 2019), both during the time of the mandatory restrictive measures and after their relaxation. Another aim was to evaluate the awareness of ophthalmologists in the Czech Republic about the possible impact of nose and mouth protective measures (masks, respirators) on the quality of eye examinations, especially on the results of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.

Materials and Methods: As part of two professional ophthalmological events in the Czech Republic, which took place in 2022, we obtained and evaluated data from the ophthalmologists in attendance using a questionnaire. We evaluated demographic parameters, frequency of use and type of nose and mouth protective equipment and their influence on the quality of ophthalmological examination as well as the awareness of ophthalmologists about their possible influence on the outcome of SAP and IOP measurements.

Results: We obtained data from a total of 212 respondents (148 women, 44 men, in 20 cases gender was not stated). In 91.5% of cases, ophthalmologists agreed that the use of respirators and masks makes ophthalmological examination more difficult. The most common problems were eyepiece fogging (85.8%), examination lens fogging (85.8%), and lens fogging when spectacles correction was prescribed (79.2%). The respondents most often combated these problems either by completely removing the respirator (24.1%) or at least by pulling it under the nose (39.2%). At the time when the measures were relaxed, significantly more men did not use any nose and mouth protection at all during ophthalmological examinations (15.8% of men vs. 4.2% of women; p = 0.032). An alarming finding was the fact that 35.6% of respondents did not know whatsoever whether the nurse was performing a perimetry examination on a patient with a respirator/mask or without protective equipment, i.e. they were not aware whatsoever of the possible formation of artifacts. Only 21.2% of respondents were aware of the possible difficulties of measuring IOP while wearing a respirator, while 59.9% of respondents were not aware of this risk (39.6% had never considered this problem, 20.3% of respondents were convinced that a respirator could not have an effect on the measurement of IOP).

Conclusion: The use of nose and mouth protective equipment clearly affects the ophthalmological examination and makes it more difficult. Although ophthalmologists belong to a group at high risk for the possible transmission of infection in the performance of their profession, they often removed nose and mouth protection in an effort to eliminate fogging of eyepieces and examination lenses. The awareness of ophthalmologists regarding the possible influence on the results of SAP and IOP measurement by wearing a respirator was low in our questionnaire survey. It is therefore advisable to discuss this issue more widely and warn doctors about these risks.

Keywords:

respirator – ophthalmology – intraocular pressure – COVID-19 – nose and mouth protective measures – surgical mask – standard automated perimetry


Sources
  1. Zhang L, Shen F-ming, Chen F et al. Origin and Evolution of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:882-883. 
  2. Mohammad Alrawashdeh H, Al Zubi K, Abdulmannan DM et al. Conjunctivitis as the only sign and symptom of COVID-19: A case report and review of literature. Qatar Med J. 2021 Aug 31;2021(2):31.
  3. Chodosh J, Holland GN, Yeh S. Special considerations for ophthalmic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2020, updated 2021. Available: https://www.aao.org/education/headline/special-considerations-ophthalmic-surgery-during-c
  4. Chodosh J, Holland GN, Yeh S. Important coronavirus updates for ophthalmologists. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2020, updated 2021. Available: https://www.aao.org/education/ headline/alert-important-coronavirus-context
  5. Aktualizované informace o koronaviru. Česká oftalmologická společnost. 2020. Available: http://oftalmologie.com/cs/novinky/archive-article-68.html
  6. Rauchegger T, Osl A, Nowosielski Y et al. Effects of COVID-19 protective measures on the ophthalmological patient examination with an emphasis on gender-specific differences. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021;6(1):e000841.
  7. Karslıoğlu MZ, Öztürkmen C, Kesim C, Taş AY, Günel Karadeniz P, Şahin A. Survey of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmology Clinical Practice in Turkey. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(5):269-281. 
  8. Kavadarlı I, Mutlu M. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Turkish Ophthalmologists. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(2):95-101.
  9. Abdullatif AM, Makled HS, Hamza MM, Macky TA, El-Saied HMA. Change in Ophthalmology Practice during COVID-19 Pandemic: Egyptian Perspective. Ophthalmologica. 2021;244(1):76-82.
  10. Khan MA, Sivalingam A, Haller JA. Perceptions of Occupational Risk and Changes in Clinical Practice of United States Vitreoretinal Surgery Fellows during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4(12):1181-1187.
  11. Young SL, Smith ML, Tatham AJ. Visual field artifacts from face mask use. J Glaucoma. 2020;29:989-991.
  12. El-Nimri NW, Moghimi S, Fingeret M, Weinreb RN. Visual Field Artifacts in Glaucoma With Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(12):1184-1188. 
  13. Bayram N, Gundogan M, Ozsaygili C, Vural E, Cicek A. The Impacts of Face Mask Use on Standard Automated Perimetry Results in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(4):287-292. 
  14. Davanian AM, Donahue SP, Mogil RS, Groth SL. Mask-induced Artifact Impacts Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(3):e47-e49. 
  15. Choi WS, Lee CL, Chong EL, Sam LK. Effect of Mask Mandates on the Intraocular Pressure Measured via Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2022;63: 44-50.
  16. Warshawsky-Livne L, Novack L, Rosen AB, Downs SM, Shkolnik-Inbar J, Pliskin JS. Gender differences in risk attitudes. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2014;24:123-140. 
  17. Nair AG, Gandhi RA, Natarajan S. Effect of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmic practice and patient care in India: Results of a survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:725-730.
  18. Khanna RC, Honavar SG, Metla AL, Bhattacharya A, Maulik PK. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on ophthalmologists-in-training and practising ophthalmologists in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:994-998.
  19. Karslıoğlu MZ, Öztürkmen C, Kesim C, Taş AY, Günel Karadeniz P, Şahin A. Survey of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmology Clinical Practice in Turkey. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(5):269-281.
  20. Karabagli Y, Kocman EA, Kose AA et al. Adhesive bands to prevent fogging of lenses and glasses of surgical loupes or microscopes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:718-719.
  21. Patil SR, Weighill FJ. The use of two face masks to prevent clouding of spectacles and surgical visors. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:442.
  22. Jordan DJ, Pritchard-Jones R. Tying a surgical mask to prevent fogging. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:165.
  23. Guo H, Li W, Huang Y et al. Increased microbial loading in aerosols produced by non-contact air-puff tonometer and relative suggestions for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240421.
  24. Tang Y, Chen YY, Li CC et al. Effects of baffle and intraocular pressure on aerosols generated in the noncontact tonometer measurement during COVID-19. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(4):533-540.
Labels
Ophthalmology
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#