Development and Use of Non-FDG PET Radiopharmaceuticals at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
Authors:
J. Adam 1,3; K. Bolcak 2; J. Kaderavek 3; F. Kuzel 3
Authors‘ workplace:
Regional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
1; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
2; Division of Radiopharmaceuticals, UJV Rez, a. s., Husinec-Rez, Czech Republic
3
Published in:
Klin Onkol 2012; 25(Supplementum 2): 82-86
Práce byla podpořena Evropským fondem pro regionální rozvoj a státním rozpočtem České republiky (OP VaVpI – RECAMO, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101).
Autoři deklarují, že v souvislosti s předmětem studie nemají žádné komerční zájmy.
Redakční rada potvrzuje, že rukopis práce splnil ICMJE kritéria pro publikace zasílané do bi omedicínských časopisů.
Obdrženo: 10. 10. 2012
Přijato: 31. 10. 2012
Overview
The existence of the cyclotron & PET centre of ÚJV Řež, a.s., at Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute allows the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and RECAMO researchers to engage in the research, development and application of new radiopharmaceuticals including compounds labelled by short-living positron emitters (especially [11C]). Currently, a [11C]-labelled tracer, L-[methyl-11C]methionine, is entering phase I clinical evaluation, and scans with PET radiopharmaceuticals other than fluorodeoxyglucose are performed at the Department of Nuclear Medicine. Continued cooperation will bring new possibilities for PET in the Czech Republic in the future.
Key words:
positron emission tomography – radiopharmaceuticals – 3‘-deoxy-3‘-[18F]fluorothymidine – [18F]fluorocholine – sodium [18F]fluoride – L-[methyl-11C]methionine
Introduction
Positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the most modern methods of molecular imaging, providing physicians with a non-invasive method of diagnostics, studying and monitoring human organism. Currently it belongs, along with computer tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance, among the main imaging methods used in oncology, cardiology, neurology and other medicinal areas. The idea of PET is a visualisation of desired areas in the patient’s body, based on more or less specific interactions of the radiopharmaceutical applied to the patient with processes that occur in their body. The patient is given a compound that contains a positron emitter – an atom whose nucleus undergoes beta-plus decay. Positron, an anti-particle that is a product of such decay, annihilates almost immediately (no more than a few millimetres after emergence) with its counterpart, electron. Detection of the high-energy photons that are simultaneously emitted during the annihilation is the basis of PET image acquisition.
The nuclei that undergo beta-plus decay have usually quite short or very short half-lives. The most commonly used positron source isotopes are fluorine [18F] (half-life 110 min), carbon [11C] (20 min), nitrogen [13N] (10 min) and oxygen [15O] (2 min). Atoms containing these nuclei are chemically bonded to molecules that participate in the usual metabolic processes in the organism – glucose, water, ammonia – or to compounds that are able to specifically bind to some receptor molecules in the tissues. Such molecules are known as radiotracers. By using a well-chosen radiotracer, PET monitoring of almost any compound and biological pathway in the organism is possible, provided that a component of the pathway can be labelled by a positron emitter.
Positron emitters are largely generated by controlled bombardment of appropriate target materials in particle accelerators – cyclotrons. A short half-life of said positron emitters limits their usage only to medical facilities that have their own cyclotron facility at their disposal. The exception is fluorine 18, whose almost 2 hours long half-life allows for transportation to medium distances. A good combination in terms of costs and benefits is embodied by the currently most used radiopharmaceutical, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose, FDG for short [1]. Thanks to the fluorine in position 2, the molecule is able to emit positron radiance, and it is also protected from glycolysis (where the presence of oxygen in position 2 is crucial). FDG is therefore an ideal tool for monitoring glucose intake in the organism, especially cells with high metabolic activity that cancer cells usually display. Its’ disadvantage lies in rather unspecific intake in the organism (high background), but it is more than compensated by its universality. The development of more specific and specialised tracers is, however, almost as old as the method. PET radiochemists aim at labelling of biologically active compounds that express higher specificity than FDG – substrates of important receptors or intermediates of important biological pathways. An apt choice of radiotracer and the labelling isotope (the half-life of the emitter isotope and the velocity of the interaction must be considered) allows for possibilities of monitoring of many previously unmonitorable processes.
Under the framework of RECAMO, scans were performed with commercially available non-FDG radiopharmaceuticals (3‘-deoxy-3‘-[18F]fluorothymidine, [18F]fluorocholine, [18F]fluoride), as well as in-house development of a [11C]-tracer for on-site use in the cooperation of RECAMO and ÚJV Řež – 11C-methionine, a labelled amino acid that is currently entering the stage of clinical evaluation as of October 2012.
Development of L-[methyl-11C]methionine ([11C]MET)
L-[methyl-11C]methionine belongs to the group of labelled amino acids used in PET for detection of brain tumours [2,3]. Most brain tumours show an increased uptake of amino acids as compared with normal brain, whereas the amino acids are retained in tumour cells due to their higher metabolic activities including incorporation into proteins [4]. This radiopharmaceutical has applications in oncology, neurology and paediatric oncology. The radiopharmaceutical is produced in the PET Centre Brno by synthesising [11C]methyl iodide from 11CO2 and subsequently L-[methyl-11C]methionine from [11C]methyl iodide and L-S-benzyl-homocysteine, with HPLC as the final purification method (see Fig. 1). The synthesis takes 25 minutes and produces about 10 GBq of [11C]MET with a volume activity of about 2.0 GBq/ml at the end of synthesis. Achieved radiochemical purity is > 96%. The procedure was performed on the TracerLab FXC synthesis module (GE Healthcare). Provided that the logistics of synthesis, quality control and transport are optimised, it is possible to provide approximately 3 GBq (2 ml at maximum volume activity) for the injection, therefore allowing for short-distance transports as well. It is the first case of [11C]-labelled radiopharmaceutical to enter clinical evaluation in the Czech Republic. The evaluation is planned to be concluded in 2013, with a total of 16 patients.
18F-labeled non-FDG Radiopharmaceuticals
Besides the development of L-[methyl-11C]methionine, scans were performed at the Department of Nuclear Medicine with commercially available [18F]-labelled tracers, such as 3‘-deoxy-3‘--[18F]fluorothymidine, sodium [18F]fluoride (provided by RadioMedic company) or 18F-fluorocholine (provided by IASON company), in order to assess their usability and practical applicability at the Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute. The results from the scans were also used in other RECAMO research programmes.
3‘-deoxy-3‘-[18F]fluorothymidine (FLT)
Unchecked proliferation is characteristic for tumour cells. Characterising the proliferation rate of cancer cells is important to differentiate benign from malignant tumours as well as characterise malignant tumours within normal tissues. As mentioned before, FDG has been widely used in cancer imaging – however, besides tumour cells, increased uptake of FDG occurs in inflammatory cells and lesions as well. Thymidine and its analogues are the standard markers for DNA synthesis, and is why 3‘-deoxy-3‘-[18F]fluorothymidine (FLT) was developed for PET imaging to monitor proliferation [5,6].
FLT, an analogue of the nucleoside thymidine, is phosphorylated by thymidine kinase-1 (TK-1), an enzyme expressed during the DNA synthesis phase of the cell cycle. Most cancer cells have a much higher TK-1 activity than normal cells. Thanks to the fluorine labelling, FLT monophosphate is not incorporated into DNA and as a result is metabolically trapped inside the cells. The uptake of FLT is used as an index of cellular proliferation [7,8]. FLT-PET has been widely used to detect and monitor tumour proliferation, staging and detection of metastases. Applications of FLT in various types of tumours are described in the literature, such as lung tumours [10–13], lymphoma [14,15], breast tumours [16], head and neck tumours [17], soft tissue sarcoma [18] or colorectal cancer [19].
In three years, 32 scans using FLT were performed. The radiopharmaceutical proved capable of identifying proliferative regions in patients, as well as brain metastases, as illustrated in Fig. 2 and 3. This was beneficial in evaluation of therapy response, where persisting proliferation of the tumour tissue can be distinguished from reparatory or inflammatory processes. It is planned to perform more scans with this radiopharmaceutical in the future.
[18F]fluorocholine (FCH)
Choline is an important component of cellular membranes. Tissues with increased metabolism rate usually exhibit high uptake of choline. Choline is phosphorylated by choline kinases to phosphorylcholine and subsequently integrated into the phospholipidic membranes. The fluorine-labelled analogue of choline, FCH – [18F]fluorocholine, is used for visualisation of heightened choline kinase activity that is typical for proliferating tumours. The use of FCH encompasses brain tumours, breast carcinoma and primarily, prostate tumours [20,21]. 32 scans were performed in the year 2012 and the results were used in management of therapy of prostate cancer patients. An example of FCH PET scan is provided in Fig. 4. Further scans using [18F]fluorocholine scans are planned in the future.
Sodium [18F]fluoride
Sodium [18F]fluoride (NaF) is a bone remodelling marker usable for detecting bone metastases, as well as other bone defects. It was used for bone scintigraphy as early as the 1960’s [22,23], but was quickly replaced by technetium diphosphonates [24]. In the last decade, its’ potential contribution to nuclear medicine was re-evaluated, mainly because of the PET/CT technology [25,26]. It has desirable characteristics as a bone-imaging agent – a high and rapid uptake in the bone with rapid blood clearance, producing a high bone-to-background ratio in a short time. Combined with PET/CT scanners ability to provide quantitatively accurate, high resolution images with improved sensitivity compared to SPECT or planar scanners, this makes NaF PET/CT imaging a very attractive alternative to 99mTc-methylenediphosphonate bone scintigraphy [27–30]. An example of NaF scan is provided in Fig. 5.
A total 12 scans were performed. The very high sensitivity of NaF PET can be often double-edged, because the scan is able to identify regions with any increased bone turnover, e.g. post-traumatic bone defects and/or degenerative changes. As for the current state, no NaF scans are planned.
Conclusions
Under the RECAMO framework, researchers from Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute participate in the development and clinical evaluation of a novel 11C-labelled radiopharmaceutical. Besides that, the Department of Nuclear Medicine performs scans with other non-FDG radiopharmaceuticals as well. RECAMO is going to cooperate further with the researchers from ÚJV Řež in the development and introduction of a broader range of PET tracers to Czech patients, by participating in research of new methods of synthesis, labelling and use of tracers.
This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund and the State Budget of the Czech Republic (RECAMO, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101).
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Jan Adam, Ing. et Ing., Ph.D.
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
Zluty kopec 7
656 53 Brno
Czech Republic
e-mail: adam@mou.cz
Submitted: 10. 10. 2012
Accepted: 31. 10. 2012
Sources
1. Som P, Atkins HL, Bandoypadhyay D et al. A Fluorinated Glucose Analog, 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (F-18) – Nontoxic Tracer for Rapid Tumor-Detection. J Nucl Med 1980; 21(7): 670–675.
2. Roelcke U, Radü EW, von Ammon K et al. Alteration of Blood-Brain-Barrier in Human Brain-Tumors – Comparison of [F-18]Fluorodeoxyglucose, [C-11] Methionine and Rb-82 Using Pet. J Neurol Sci 1995; 132(1): 20–27.
3. Nakada K. The role of methionine PET in oncology. In: PET and Molecular Imaging: State of the Art and Future Perspectives, International Congress Series 1264. United Kingdom: Elsevier 2004: 88–94.
4. Hatakeyama T, Kawai I, Nishiyama Y et al. C-11-methionine (MET) and F-18-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35(11): 2009–2017.
5. Been LB, Suurmeijer AJ, Cobben DC et al. [18F]FLT-PET in oncology: current status and opportunities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31(12): 1659–1672.
6. Shields, AF, Grierson JR, Dohmen BM et al. Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography. Nature Medicine 1998; 4(11): 1334–1336.
7. Rasey JS, Grierson JR, Wiens, LW et al. Uptake of labeled FLT correlates with thymidine kinase (TK1) activity in human tumor cells. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 36–37.
8. Shields AF, Dohmen BM, Mangner TJ et al. Metabolism of F-18-FLT in patients. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 36.
9. Buck AK, Halter G, Schirrmeister H et al. Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET: F-18-FLT versus F-18-FDG. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 1426–1431.
10. Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M et al. In vivo validation of 3 ‚ deoxy-3 ‚-[F-18]fluorothymidine ([F-18]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: Correlation of [F-18]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8(11): 3315–3323.
11. Shields AF, Lawhorn-Crews JM, Briston DA et al. Analysis and reproducibility of 3 ‚-deoxy-3 ‚-[F-18]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14(14): 4463–4468.
12. Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M et al. F-18-Fluorothymidine PET imaging of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Comparison to (67)Ki proliferation index. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 29.
13. Yap CS, Vranjesevic D, Schiepers C et al. A comparison between [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [F-18] 3‘-deoxy-3‘-fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake in solitary pulmonary nodules and lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2003; 44 (Suppl): 123.
14. Buck AK, Pitterle K, Schirrmeister H et al. [18F]FLT positron emission tomography for imaging Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and assessment of proliferative activity. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 188–189.
15. Seitz U, Neumaier B, Wagner M et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of F-18-FLT as PET tracer in a murine lymphoma model. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 27.
16. Direcks WGE, Berndsen SC, Proost N et al. [F-18]FDG and [F-18]FLT uptake in human breast cancer cells in relation to the effects of chemotherapy: an in vitro study. Br J Cancer 2008; 99(3): 481–487.
17. Lineker A, Kermer C, Sulzbacher I et al. Uptake of F-18-FLT and F-18-FDG in primary head and neck cancer correlates with survival. Nuklearmedizin 2008; 47(2): 80–85.
18. Cobben DC, van der Laan BF, Hoekstra HJ et al. Detection of mammary, laryngeal and soft tissue tumors with FLT-PET. J Nucl Med 2002; 43 (Suppl): 278.
19. Francis DL, Visvikis D, Costa DC et al. Potential impact of [F-18]3 ‚-deoxy-3 ‚-fluorothymidine versus [F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose in positron emission tomography for colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30(7): 988–994.
20. Bauman G, Belhocine T, Kovacs M et al. 18F-fluorocholine for prostate cancer imaging: a systematic review of the literature. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2012; 15(1): 45–55.
21. Soyka JD, Muster MA, Schmid DT et al. Clinical impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39(6): 936–943.
22. Blau M, Ganatra R, Bender MA. 18 F-fluoride for bone imaging. Sem Nucl Med 1972; 2(1): 31–37.
23. Blau M, Nagler W, Bender MA. Fluorine-18: a new isotope for bone scanning. J Nucl Med 1962; 3: 332–334.
24. Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Elsner K et al. Sensitivity in Detecting Osseous Lesions Depends on Anatomic Localization: Planar Bone Scintigraphy Versus 18F PET. J Nucl Med 1999; 40(40): 1623–1629.
25. Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Kotzerke J et al. Early Detection and Accurate Description of Extent of Metastatic Bone Disease in Breast Cancer with Fluoride Ion and Positron Emission Tomography. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(8): 2381–2389.
26. Petrén-Mallmin M, Andréasson I, Ljunggren O et al. Skeletal Metastases From Breast Cancer: Uptake of 18F-Fluoride Measured with PET in Correlation with CT. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27(2): 72–76.
27. Grant FD, Fahey FH, Packard AB et al. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med 2008; 49(1): 68–78.
28. Hetzel M, Arslandemir C, König HH et al. F-18 NaF PET for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and impact on patient management. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18(12): 2206–2214.
29. Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Flusser G et al. Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2004; 45(2): 272–278.
30. Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E et al. The detection of bone metastase in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006; 47: 287–297.
Labels
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncologyArticle was published in
Clinical Oncology
2012 Issue Supplementum 2
Most read in this issue
- p63 – an Important Player in Epidermal and Tumour Development
- NKT-like Cells are Expanded in Solid Tumour Patients
- The Many Roles of Molecular Chaperones and Co-chaperones in Tumour Biology
- Phase I Trial in Oncology – Theory and Practice