The B-cell inhibitory receptor CD22 is a major factor in host resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection
Authors:
Vitor E. Fernandes aff001; Giuseppe Ercoli aff002; Alan Bénard aff003; Carolin Brandl aff004; Hannah Fahnenstiel aff004; Jennifer Müller-Winkler aff004; Georg F. Weber aff003; Paul Denny aff005; Lars Nitschke aff004; Peter W. Andrew aff001
Authors place of work:
Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
aff001; Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
aff002; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
aff003; Division of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
aff004; Mammalian Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council, Harwell, United Kingdom
aff005
Published in the journal:
The B-cell inhibitory receptor CD22 is a major factor in host resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. PLoS Pathog 16(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008464
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008464
Summary
Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major human pathogen, causing pneumonia and sepsis. Genetic components strongly influence host responses to pneumococcal infections, but the responsible loci are unknown. We have previously identified a locus on mouse chromosome 7 from a susceptible mouse strain, CBA/Ca, to be crucial for pneumococcal infection. Here we identify a responsible gene, Cd22, which carries a point mutation in the CBA/Ca strain, leading to loss of CD22 on B cells. CBA/Ca mice and gene-targeted CD22-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background are both similarly susceptible to pneumococcal infection, as shown by bacterial replication in the lungs, high bacteremia and early death. After bacterial infections, CD22-deficient mice had strongly reduced B cell populations in the lung, including GM-CSF producing, IgM secreting innate response activator B cells, which are crucial for protection. This study provides striking evidence that CD22 is crucial for protection during invasive pneumococcal disease.
Keywords:
Genetic loci – Blood – Respiratory infections – Spleen – B cells – Escherichia coli infections – Pneumococcus – Streptococcal infections
Introduction
Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major human pathogen responsible for a spectrum of diseases, including pneumonia and sepsis, causing illness and death in millions of individuals. Susceptibility to pneumococcal infections is associated with genetic components that strongly influence the host responses to infection, but little is known about the causal gene(s). Our groups previously used mouse models of respiratory disease as tools to dissect the genetic factors that influence the host immune responses to invasive pneumococcal disease [1]. These previous studies found a clear spectrum of susceptibility and resistance to pneumococcal infections in inbred mouse strains. While resistant BALB/c mice showed a median survival time of > 168 hours after intranasal infection, and some other strains such as C57BL/6 or DBA/2 had intermediate survival times of 70 to 85 hours, the CBA/Ca strain was highly susceptible, with a survival time of only 27 hours after intranasal infection with S. pneumoniae [1]. The high susceptibility of CBA/Ca mice was associated with a high bacteremia, whereas no bacteria were detected in the blood of resistant BALB/c mice.
In order to map the responsible genetic locus for susceptibility or resistance to S. pneumoniae infection, intercrosses of the BALB/c and CBA/Ca strains were done and F2 mice were used to map a major locus controlling the development of bacteremia and survival after intranasal infection with S. pneumoniae. We identified this major locus on chromosome (Chr) 7, near D7Mit77, which showed high logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores associated with survival time (LOD = 6.3) and bacteremia (LOD = 4.6) [2]. The quantitative trait locus (QTL) on Chr. 7 was named S. pneumoniae infection resistant 1 (Spir1). This locus identified on Chr 7 covered 11 Mb and contained about 250 genes.
We also performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to map genetic loci associated with susceptibility to pneumococcal infections in 26 inbred mouse strains. Four candidate QTLs were identified, on Chr. 7, 13, 18 and 19 [3]. Notably, the QTL on Chr. 7 was located within the Spir1 locus, previously identified by the linkage study in BALB/c x CBA/Ca F2 mice. Within the hundreds of the genes in the Spir1 QTL, only 22 genes showed phenotype-associated polymorphisms.
Now we report that a natural mutation in the Cd22 gene within Spir1 is the major explanation of the susceptibility of CBA/Ca mice to intranasal S. pneumoniae infection. CD22 (Siglec-2) is a B-lymphocyte-specific receptor and negatively regulates B cell receptor signaling. CD22 is implicated in B cell survival and proliferation and in induction of B cell tolerance and control of susceptibility to autoimmune diseases [4–6]. We found that the natural mutation in the Cd22 gene of CBA/Ca mice causes a stop codon in the first immunoglobulin-like domain of CD22, leading to a non-functional protein. Also, CD22-deficient mice on a pure C57BL/6 background (CD22-/- mice) showed the same susceptibility. We demonstrated a strong reduction of B cells in the lungs of CBA/Ca and CD22-/- mice after pneumococcal lung infections, in contrast to innately resistant mice. Importantly, GM-CSF producing innate response activator (IRA) B cells were strongly diminished in the lungs of mice lacking functional CD22. This shows an unexpected, and novel, role of the B cell protein CD22 in immunity to pneumococci.
Results
A polymorphism in the Cd22 gene of CBA/Ca mice leads to lack of the CD22 protein
As observed previously (1) the mouse strain CBA/Ca shows a strong susceptibility to intranasal infections with S. pneumoniae. While all CBA/Ca mice died within 36 hours of intranasal infections, all BALB/c mice survived more than 168 hours (Fig 1A). This led to a strong disease score in CBA/Ca mice but no disease signs in BALB/c mice (Fig 1B). While the number of bacteria was controlled in the lungs of BALB/c mice after 24 hours, this did not occur in CBA/Ca mice (Fig 1C), coinciding with high bacteremia in the blood of CBA/Ca mice (Fig 1D). In order to determine the responsible locus, we sequenced the Spir1 locus and within the locus observed 40 SNPs in the Cd22 gene differing between BALB/c and CBA/Ca genomes. These were synonymous and non-synonymous mutations but, most notably, a SNP in the CBA/Ca Cd22 gene at position 7:30,877,586 was predicted to introduce a stop codon (TAA). The tool, Variant Effect Predictor, provided at the Ensembl website (www.ensembl.org), was used to investigate variations between the sequences of 37 inbred mouse strains within the database. None of the 37 inbred strains in Ensembl had the SNP found in CBA/Ca (S1 Fig).
The SNP in the Cd22 gene (C->T) of CBA/Ca, that results in a stop codon, is located in exon 4 of the Cd22 gene, which encodes for the first CD22 Ig domain that contains the ligand-binding site. The SNP is located within the codon for amino acid 99 (Q) and the resulting stop codon is predicted to prevent synthesis of the bulk of the 130kd protein (Fig 2A). If the 98-amino acid N-terminus of the CD22 was synthesised, it was predicted that it would not be a stable product. CD22 has 7 extracellular Ig domains and its function is dependent on its membrane position [6]. To confirm the loss of the CD22 protein from B cells of CBA/Ca mice, splenic cells and lung cells were stained with anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody OX-97, before and after intranasal S. pneumoniae infection. While BALB/c mice expressed CD22 on their splenic and lung B cells, whether infected or not, CD22 was totally undetected on B cells from noninfected and infected CBA/Ca mice (Fig 2B). The lack of CD22 on B cells of CBA/Ca mice was confirmed with another CD22-specific monoclonal antibody, Cy34.1 (S2 Fig). Because both monoclonals bind to the second Ig-like domain of CD22 (d2 in Fig 2A) [7, 8], it can be concluded that CBA/Ca mice lack the CD22 protein on the B cell surface.
CD22-deficient mice show a high susceptibility to S. pneumoniae infections
CBA/Ca mice, which lack CD22 protein, showed a high susceptibility to S. pneumoniae infections [1]. To determine whether this phenotype is directly caused by the loss of the CD22 protein, CD22-deficient mice on a pure C57BL/6 background and C57BL/6 control mice were infected with S. pneumoniae and monitored for 7 days.
After pneumococcal infection, very different survival rates were observed between C57BL/6 (CD22-positive) and mice with a CD22-deficiency on a C57BL/6 background. The survival rate of the CD22-/- group was much lower than the control group (p<0.001), with 100% of the CD22-deficient mice reaching the experimental endpoint by 72h post-infection, whereas 56% of the control mice survived to the end of the experiment, at 168h (Fig 3A). The median survival time of the CD22-deficient mice that survived was 45h, while the C57BL/6 that succumbed had longer survival time of 82h (p<0.001). Following the infection, the five C57BL/6 mice that survived showed only very mild disease signs. The increased susceptibility of the CD22-deficient mice was reflected in the early appearance of signs of disease and the rapid progression of the disease score (Fig 3B).
Next, the progress of pneumococcal disease in CD22-/- mice and controls was investigated in an experiment that determined pneumococcal numbers in the lung, blood and spleen at over 48 hours post-infection. Although there was a tendency of higher CFUs in the lungs of CD22-/- mice, there were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the number of bacteria in the lungs of CD22-/- mice and the control group, at any of the time points (Fig 3C). In contrast, there was a strong dissemination of bacteria to the blood (Fig 3D) and spleen (Fig 3E) of CD22-/- mice. The numbers of bacteria progressively increased in the blood and spleen between 12 and 48 hours in CD22-/- mice. In contrast, hardly any bacteria were detected either in the blood or spleen of the C57BL/6 (CD22+/+) mice (Fig 3D and 3E).
After S. pneumoniae infection, CD22-deficient mice have impaired B cell populations in the lung
After intranasal infection with S. pneumoniae, CBA/Ca mice showed impaired B cell numbers in the lung, when compared to the BALB/c strain of mice (S3A Fig). In the spleen the two strains show no difference in B cell numbers up to 12 hours after infection, but at 24h after the infection higher B cell numbers were detected in CBA/Ca (S3B Fig). The cellular composition of immune cells infiltrating the lungs was analysed in more detail after S. pneumoniae infection of CD22-/- and C57BL/6 (CD22+/+) mice (Fig 4). Numbers of neutrophils (Fig 4A) and eosinophils (Fig 4B) increased over time after infection, but there were no consistent differences between the two mouse strains. T cells and alveolar macrophages increased in numbers and there were also no consistent differences between CD22-/- and C57BL/6 mice (Fig 4C and 4D). However, numbers of conventional B cells, as well as B1a cells were highly elevated in the lungs of C57BL/6 mice at each time point following infection, but much less so in CD22-/- mice (Fig 4E and 4F). Consequently, numbers of both conventional B2 cells (Fig 4E), as well as of B1a cells (Fig 4F), were significantly higher in the C57BL/6 lungs compared to the CD22-/- at all time points. In contrast, B2 and B1a cell numbers were unchanged in the spleen of both strains after infection, with the exception of lower B2 cells in CD22-/- mice at 48 hours (Fig 4G and 4H). From earlier studies it is known that there are no differences in B cell numbers in uninfected CD22-/- and CD22+/+ (C57BL/6) mice in the spleen, lymph nodes or blood [9–12].
We examined whether impaired B cell homing to the lung or impaired cellular proliferation/ survival in the lung is the mechanism responsible for the B-cell defect after S. pneumoniae infections. For this purpose, lung homing assays after cellular transfers with WT and CD22-/- B cells were performed. Splenic cells of C57BL/6 or CD22-/- mice were labelled with the dyes CFSE or CTV, respectively, then mixed in a 1:1 ratio and co-injected i.v. into C57BL/6 recipient mice (Fig 5A). In order to avoid an influence of the dyes, in some experiments the dyes were also swapped between the splenocytes of the two strains, without any change of results. The recipient mice were analysed at an early time point (2h after cell transfer) and at two later time points (24h and 48h). While there was no difference between WT and CD22-/- B cell numbers detected in the lungs of recipients after 2 h or 24 h, there was a clear reduction of B cell numbers at 48 h (Fig 5B). In contrast, T cell numbers of both donors in the lungs were similar. Also no differences of B cell numbers of both donors in the spleen of recipient mice were observed (Fig 5B). This shows that the initial homing of CD22-/- B cells to the lungs is not impaired, however CD22-/- B cells seem to show less retention in the lung. By comparison of the dilution of CFSE or CTV, respectively, we did not observe different proliferation of WT and CD22-/- B cells. We therefore suggest that the reduced CD22-/- B cell numbers in the lung at 48h may indicate an impaired survival.
CD22-deficient mice have an impaired population of GM-CSF producing IRA B cells in the lung, both after S. pneumoniae or E. coli infections
In order to further examine the mechanism for the high susceptibility of CD22-/- mice to pneumococcal infection, secreted IgM and GM-CSF was measured in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of infected mice, because natural IgM that is produced by GM-CSF secreting B1a–like cells has been shown to be crucial for protective anti-bacterial responses in the lung [13]. We found lower IgM levels in the BAL of CD22-/- mice compared to the C57BL/6 control at early time points (3 hours and 6 hours) (p<0.01) after infection (Fig 6A). Also, lower GM-CSF levels were detected 3 hours after infection in the BAL of CD22-/- mice compared to the control (p<0.05) (Fig 6C), whereas IgM and GM-CSF concentrations in the blood were similar in CD22+/+ and CD22-/- mice (Fig 6B and 6D). IgM and IgG levels were also determined in CBA/Ca and BALB/c mice after pneumococcal infections. Here only a mild reduction of IgM in the BAL of CBA/Ca mice was detected at 24 hours after infection, while the IgG levels were similar in both types of mice (S4 Fig).
GM-CSF can be produced by several cell types [14], therefore we wanted to determine the source of GM-CSF produced by B cells in the lung. GM-CSF producing B cells (IRA B cells) are known to be recruited to the lung after bacterial infections [13]. To determine IRA B cells in the lung, C57BL/6 control and CD22-/- mice were infected with S.pneumoniae intranasally (1 x 105 CFU, a lower than normal dose to obtain better survival) and analysed 72 hours after infection. At this time point IRA B cells in the lung (defined as CD19+, CD43+ CD93+) were determined. Fig 7A shows the flow cytometry data and gating strategy for lung IRA B cells. CD22-/- had significantly lower levels of IRA B cells in the lungs (p<0.05) (Fig 7B). Also, the number of GM-CSF+ IRA B cells was significantly lower (p<0.05), and there was at least a tendency to lower intracellular IgM+ IRA B cell numbers in the lungs CD22-/- mice compared to the C57BL/6 (Fig 7B). In contrast, this difference was not found in the spleen (Fig 7C).
IRA B cells were first described after E. coli infections of the lungs of mice [13]. In order to use the same model in which IRA B cells were first detected, CD22-/- and C57BL/6 control mice were intranasally infected with E. coli. Similar to pneumococcal infections, intranasal infection with E. coli resulted in a significantly higher mortality (p<0.001) and higher CFUs in CD22-/- mice (p<0.001) (Fig 8A and 8B). As we wanted to determine IRA B cells after E.coli infection with a protocol consistent with a previous report [13], we did intratracheal infections with E.coli. All CD22-/- mice and the C57BL/6 controls survived intratracheal infection for at least 72 hours post-infection with E. coli. 72 hours after intratracheal infection with E. coli CD22-/- mice had significantly lower levels of IRA B cells in the lungs (p<0.01) (Fig 8C). Also, the number of GM-CSF+ or intracellular IgM+ IRA B cells was significantly lower (p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively) in the lungs of CD22-/- mice compared to the C57BL/6 mice (Fig 8C). In the spleen, CD22-/- mice infected with E. coli also showed lower intracellular IgM+ IRA B cells, while the number of GM-CSF+ IRA B cells was not significantly different (Fig 8D). We conclude that both after S.pneumoniae and E. coli infections CD22-/- mice have an impaired IRA B cell population in the lung, with impaired GM-CSF and IgM production, and therefore lack an important mechanism for protection against bacterial infections.
Discussion
Here we report the surprising finding that CD22, a member of the sialic acid binding Ig-like Siglec family of lectins, is an essential factor in innate resistance to pneumococcal disease. This is a surprising finding because CD22 has so far only been described as a negative regulator of B cell signalling [5, 6].
Within the B cell population, B-1 cells are known to play a critical role in response to pneumococcal infections. B-1 cells are innate-like B cells and the B-1a cell subpopulation produces phosphorylcholine- specific IgM, which serves as a first line defence against pneumococci [15, 16]. Upon bacterial lung infection of mice with pneumococci, B-1a cells from the peritoneal cavity can relocate to the lung where they produce protective IgM. It has been shown that a particular B cell subset producing the cytokine GM-CSF, called IRA B cells (for innate-response activator B cells) is crucial for this response [13]. Now we can conclude that CD22 is a critical factor for the contribution of B cells to the innate anti-pneumococcal responses.
The role of CD22 in immune responses previously has been studied with different classes of model antigens. Although thymus-independent antibody responses of CD22-deficient mice to antigens, such as NP-ficoll, are impaired due to missing or non-functional B cell subpopulations, such as marginal zone (MZ) or B-1b B cells [17, 18], thymus-dependent antibody responses to protein antigens are largely normal [9–12]. The loss of such a negative regulator would be anticipated to lead to stronger B cell responses. Consistent with this notion, CD22-deficient mice show signs of B cell hyperactivation and can develop autoimmune diseases, particularly when in combination with deficiency of another B-cell Siglec, Siglec-G [19, 20].
The role of CD22 in infections has not been widely studied but to be in line with the observations on autoimmunity [19, 20], it might be predicted that loss of CD22 would not have a negative impact on the outcome of acute infection. Hence, a single publication reported CD22–/–mice have normal morbidity and mortality after staphylococcal infection [21]. In that study, injections with staphylococci were done intraveneously, which might explain the different results to intranasal pneumococcal infections reported here. Conversely, CD22 has been shown to play a role in controlling a viral infection. CD22-deficient mice are more susceptible to West Nile Virus (WNV) infection, after which there was normal anti-WNV antibody production but decreased WNV-specific CD8+ T cell responses compared to wild type mice, including decreased lymphocyte migration into the draining lymph nodes [22].
It seems that a crucial B cell subpopulation is affected by the CD22-deficiency. After both pneumococcal and E. coli lung infections, CD22-deficient mice have a strongly reduced population of GM-CSF producing IgM secreting B cells in the lung. It has been shown, that in microbial airway infections, pleural B cells migrate to the lung where they produce protective IgM [15, 16]. GM-CSF producing IRA B cells are crucial for this process, as mice with a B-cell specific GM-CSF deficiency fail to secrete protective IgM and therefore develop strong pneumonia [13]. Our cell transfer experiments suggest not so much a lower homing of B cells to the lung, but rather that an impaired survival of B cells in the lungs of CD22-/- mice is responsible for this phenotype. CD22-deficient B cells show impaired survival in vitro and in vivo [9, 23], which may directly explain this lung phenotype.
In humans, attempts to find genetic factors contributing to susceptibility to pneumococcal disease so far have used candidate gene approaches. SNPs leading to a loss of the human CD22 protein have not been described so far. Systematic GWAS research on pneumococcal pneumonia susceptibility are lacking in the human, due to the difficulties in obtaining sufficient numbers of defined human subjects [24–26] and to the complex trait in susceptibility to infection, which is modulated by the individual’s environment, age and gender [27]. Here we have described that the cd22 locus as a novel strong susceptibility locus for pneumococcal disease in mice. The human cd22 locus appears not to have been investigated in candidate gene approaches and before now the Cd22 gene would not be included in a typical candidate gene search for genetic factors in pneumococcal disease. The data presented here provide strong evidence that it should be a candidate gene for future studies on human pneumonia.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments done at the University of Leicester were conducted in strict accordance with U.K. Home Office licence PPL60/4327. The University of Leicester Ethical Committee and the U.K. Home Office approved the experimental protocols. Infected animals were closely monitored for disease signs and mice were humanely culled immediately they reached the ‘lethargic’ endpoint, or at the end of the experiment. Where indicated in the text, some infection experiments were done at the University of Erlangen in accordance with the licence of the Regierung of Unterfranken.
Mice
Female BALB/cOlaHsd (abbreviated to BALB/c) and CBA/CaOlaHsd (CBA/Ca) were purchased from Harlan Laboratories (Bicester, UK) and were acclimatised for one week prior to use. Male and female CD22-deficient mice (Cd22tm1Lam) (on a pure C57BL/6 background) and control C57BL/6J mice (set up from littermates of CD22-deficient mice) [9] were obtained from the University of Erlangen and then bred at the University of Leicester. Mice used for infection experiments were between 9 and 18 weeks of age and were age-matched.
Bacteria
Streptococcus pneumoniae strain D39 (NCTC 7466), a mouse virulent serotype 2 strain, was used for infection studies. Bacteria were identified as pneumococci by the Gram stain, catalase test, α-haemolysis on blood agar and by optochin sensitivity. The presence of capsule was confirmed via the Quellung reaction. Before use in infection studies, bacteria were passaged through mice to standardise the inoculum and were stored at -80°C. When required, suspensions were thawed at room temperature and the inoculum prepared as described previously [28]. Escherichia coli FDA strain Seattle 1946 (ATCC 25922) was used for intratracheal infection.
Infection of mice
For intranasal infection, animals were lightly anaesthetised with 3% (v/v) isoflurane over oxygen, and an inoculum of 50μl containing 1x106 CFU in PBS was administered drop by drop into the nostrils. Intranasal dosing of C57BL/6 strain, with an inoculum of 50μl containing 1x106 CFU of S. pneumoniae strain D39 (serotype 2, NCTC 7466) in PBS. For experiment shown in Fig 7, a dose of 1x105 CFU of S. pneumoniae in PBS was used for intranasal infection. For intranasal infection of mice with E. coli, 5x106 CFU in 50μl PBS was administered.
After infection, mice were frequently monitored and scored for visible signs of disease for 7 days (168 hours) according to the scheme of Morton and Griffiths [29]. The time to reach the lethargic state was the experimental endpoint and was designated as “survival time”. Animals that were alive after 7 days post-infection were considered to have survived the pneumococcal infection.
In experiments to determine survival, on reaching the endpoint or after 7 days, mice were deeply anaesthetized with 5% (v/v) isoflurane over oxygen, and then culled by cervical dislocation. In time course experiments, pre-determined groups of animals were culled, as above, at predetermined times. After confirmation of death, lung and spleen tissues were removed and cell suspensions prepared for bacterial counting or flow cytometry. Blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture under terminal anesthesia or by tail-bleeding to determine the number of bacteria and immune cells in the blood.
For intratracheal infection, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and infected intratracheally with 5 × 106 CFU Escherichia coli in a volume of 50 μl PBS with a 0.3ml syringe. Intratracheal E. coli infection of mice was done at the University of Erlangen.
Preparation of tissue homogenates
Lung and spleen tissue were transferred into 10ml and 5ml, respectively, of sterile PBS, weighed, and then homogenised with an Ultra Turrax blender (Ika-Werke, Germany). Bacterial viable counts in homogenates were determined, followed by cell suspension preparation for flow cytometer analysis.
Determination of bacterial numbers in the tissues
The viable count of bacteria in blood, lungs and spleen were determined at the pre-chosen times after intranasal infection. Viable counts were determined by serial dilution in sterile PBS and plating on blood agar plates containing 5% (v/v) defibrinated horse blood (Oxoid). Plates were incubated in 5% (v/v) CO2 at 37°C overnight and then bacterial colony numbers counted the following day.
Flow cytometry
Cell suspensions were flushed through a 40μm cell strainer (BD Falcon) to remove tissue debris. Samples were centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min, at 4°C, discarding the supernatant. The cell pellet was resuspended in ACK lysis buffer (Invitrogen) and incubated for 5 minutes, at room temperature, for lysis of erythrocytes. Once the incubation step finished, cell suspension was quenched with 10 ml PBS + 3% (v/v) FCS and spun down at 300 g for 5 min, at 4°C. Mouse lung and spleen tissue cell pellets were resuspended with 1 ml PBS + 3% (v/v) FCS. Cell suspensions, at 1x108 cells/ml, were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 blocking antibody (clone 2.4G2, BD Pharmingen) before addition of the specific antibodies. Cell surface markers were stained using a combination of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-, phycoerythrin (PE)-, PE-Cy7- and allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. Extracellular staining with monoclonal antibodies for CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend), CD19 (clone 6D5, Biolegend), CD22 (clones OX-97 and Cy34.1, from Biolegend and BD, respectively), CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend) and IgM (clone RMM-1, Biolegend) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of B-cell CD22 receptor in lung and spleen cells was assessed by staining with two monoclonal antibodies that bind to two different sites within domain two of the protein: clone OX-97 (Biolegend) and clone Cy34.1 (Becton Dickinson). In each experiment the appropriate isotype control monoclonal antibody and single staining controls were also included. Samples were analysed using a Becton Dickinson FACScalibur flow cytometer running CellQuest acquisition and analysed using FlowJo software (version 8.8.7, Tree Star).
Extraction and sequencing of genomic DNA
DNA from BALB/c and CBA/Ca mouse strains were sequenced for polymorphisms flanking the Spir1 QTL [2]. Firstly, DNA was extracted from tail tissue of mice, using a Nucleon kit (Gen-probe). Sequencing was then done at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics by the High Throughput Genomics Group (UK), generating 8- to 10-fold coverage of a single lane of PE100nt per sample on the HiSeq2000. Paired-end Illumina reads from BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice were individually aligned to the reference genome (C57BL/6J, NCBIM37) using BWA. Detection of SNPs in each alignment was made using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) with default parameters. A filtering strategy was performed to identify high-confidence SNPs and reduce false positives. SNP sites that failed GATK’s internal status check, quality <300 or had an allele ratio <0.8 were removed from further analysis. SNPs between CBA/Ca and BALB/c were then checked against the precompiled SNPs found in the 17 strains from the Mouse Genome Project (http://www.sanger.ac.uk).
Primer design
Primers were designed for the cd22 SNP identified from the sequencing data. Primers for pyrosequencing were designed using the PSQ Assay Design software (Biotage AB). Sets of three primers for each SNP were designed: one pair of primers for the PCR (one of which was biotinylated) and a sequencing primer for the pyrosequencing reaction. The minimum and maximum Tm for the PCR primers were 64 to 66°C. The sequencing primers were designed with a maximum distance of three bases from the SNP. Primers were manufactured by MWG-Biotech.
Extraction of genomic DNA and PCR
For pyrosequencing of DNA from BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice, DNA was extracted from mouse-tail tissue, using the DirectPCR lysis reagent (Bioquote Limited). 180 μl DirectPCR lysis and 20 μl proteinase K solution (20 mg/ml) was added to each tail sample and incubated overnight at 55°C. After digestion, the samples were heated to 85°C for 45 min and centrifuged for 10 seconds. 10 μl PCR reactions were then set up using 5 μl Taq PCR master mix (Qiagen), 0.2 μl forward primer and 0.2 μl reverse primer (at 10 pmol/μl), 2.6 μl nuclease free water and 2 μl DNA (~5 ng/μl). PCR reactions were run using the PCR program: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 15 sec. The final extension step was 5 min at 72°C.
Pyrosequencing
10 μl PCR product, 2 μl streptavidin-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare), 38 μl binding buffer (Biotage) and 30 μl H2O were combined in each well of a 96-well plate and mixed vigorously on a plate shaker for 5 min. The PCR products were then prepared using a vacuum work table (Biotage AB). The biotinylated PCR products, attached to the filter probes of the vacuum apparatus, were immersed in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 seconds, denatured in PyroMark Denaturation solution (Biotage AB) for 5 sec (allowing only the biotin labeled strand of the PCR product to remain attached to the filter probes) and immersed in 1X PyroMark Wash buffer (Biotage AB) for 5 sec. The single-stranded PCR products were then re-suspended in a PSQ HS 96-well plate containing 0.5 μl sequencing primer (at 10 pmol/μl) and 11.5 μl annealing buffer (Biotage AB) per well. The plate was incubated at 80°C for 2 minutes to allow the sequencing primer to anneal to the single-stranded PCR product. The PSQ 96-well plate and a PSQ HS 96 capillary dispensing tip holder (Biotage AB) containing enzyme, substrate and dNTPs (PyroGold reagent kit Biotage AB), were placed into a PSQ HS 96 Pyrosequencer (Biotage AB). The data were analysed using the SNP software (Biotage AB).
Quantification of GM-CSF and IgM-producing B cells
72h after intratracheal infection with E. coli, organs were harvested and single cell suspensions obtained. For this, lungs were cut in small pieces and digested with 450 U/ml collagenase I (Sigma Aldrich), 125 U/ml collagenese IX (Sigma Aldrich), 60 U/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma Aldrich), 60 U/ml Dnase (Sigma Aldrich) in 20 mM Hepes pH7.4 (Thermo Scientific) for 1 hour at 37°C, while shaking. Spleens then were homogenised through a 40 μm nylon mesh. Total viable cell numbers were determined using trypan blue (Carl Roth). Lung homogenates and splenocytes were stained for cell surface markers for 20 minutes at 4°C, fixed for 20 minutes (BD Cytofix, BD Bioscience) at 4°C, washed and permeabilized for 20 minutes (BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III, BD Bioscience) at 4°C. Then cells were washed before staining with anti-GM-CSF and anti-IgM antibodies for 20 min at 4°C and washing twice. The following antibodies were used for flow cytometric analyses: anti-CD43-FITC (BD Biosciences), anti-CD93-BUV395 (BD Biosciences), anti-IgM-BV650 (BD Biosciences), anti-MHCII-BV711 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD45.2-BV786 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD19-BV421 (BD Biosciences), anti-GMCSF-PE (BD Biosciences), anti-IgM-PerCP Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences), IgG2a-PE (BD Biosciences), IgG2a-PerCP Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences). B cell populations were identified, as described previously [30]. Data were acquired on a Celesta (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo 10 (FlowJo LLC).
Cell transfer assay
WT (C57BL/6)and CD22-/- splenocytes were isolated and labelled with CTV or CFSE (Molecular Probes, 1:1000 dilution in PBS, labelling for 10 minutes at room temperature), respectively. In half of the experiments splenocytes of the two strains were labelled after swapping the two dyes to exclude any effects of the dyes. Equal numbers of labelled donor cells (15–30x106 cells per genotype) were mixed 1:1 and injected intravenously into C57BL/6 WT recipients. After 2, 24 and 48 hours lungs and spleens of the recipient mice were isolated, lungs were digested with Collagenase D (50mg/ml) / DNAse I (50mg/ml) for 30 minutes at 37°C, single cell suspensions of the lungs and spleens were produced and erythrocyte lysis was performed. Lung and spleen cells were stained for flow cytometry with anti-B220 and anti-CD3 antibodies (Biolegend) to identify B220+ B cells and CD3+ T cells. Draq7 dye was used for live/dead staining. The proportion of WT and CD22-/- donor cells was evaluated by calculation of the ratio: percentage of CTV or CFSE-positive B or T cells found in the lung or spleen divided by the percentage of CTV or CFSE-positive B or T cells injected (input) x 100.
Statistics
Data were analysed using a two-tailed unpaired Student t test or one- or two-way ANOVA, as appropriate. Survival data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results with p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with the aid of Graph Pad Prism (version 5.0b).
Supporting information
S1 Fig [green]
The stop codon identified in the gene of CBA/Ca does not occur in 37 inbred mouse strains from Jackson Laboratories.
S2 Fig [pdf]
B cells in CBA/Ca mice do not express CD22 as revealed by staining with Cy34.1 antibody.
S3 Fig [a]
B cell numbers in the lungs and spleen of CBA/Ca and BALB/c mice after pneumococcal infection.
S4 Fig [pdf]
Slightly impaired IgM levels at 24 hours in BAL fluid of CBA/Ca mice after pneumococcal infection.
Zdroje
1. Gingles NA, Alexander JE, Kadioglu A, Andrew PW, Kerr A, Mitchell TJ, et al. Role of genetic resistance in invasive pneumococcal infection: identification and study of susceptibility and resistance in inbred mouse strains. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):426–34. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.426-434.2001 11119534; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC97900.
2. Denny P, Hopes E, Gingles N, Broman KW, McPheat W, Morten J, et al. A major locus conferring susceptibility to infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae in mice. Mamm Genome. 2003;14(7):448–53. doi: 10.1007/s00335-002-2261-9 12925893.
3. Jonczyk MS, Simon M, Kumar S, Fernandes VE, Sylvius N, Mallon AM, et al. Genetic factors regulating lung vasculature and immune cell functions associate with resistance to pneumococcal infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e89831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089831 24594938; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3940657.
4. Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(4):255–66. doi: 10.1038/nri2056 17380156.
5. Müller J, Nitschke L. The role of CD22 and Siglec-G in B-cell tolerance and autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(7):422–8. Epub 2014/04/26. nrrheum.2014.54 [pii] doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.54 24763061
6. Nitschke L. CD22 and Siglec-G regulate inhibition of B-cell signaling by sialic acid ligand binding and control B-cell tolerance. Glycobiology. 2014;24(9):807–17. Epub 2014/07/09. cwu066 [pii] doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu066 25002414
7. van der Merwe PA, Crocker PR, Vinson M, Barclay AN, Schauer R, Kelm S. Localization of the putative sialic acid-binding site on the immunoglobulin superfamily cell-surface molecule CD22. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(16):9273–80. 8621588
8. Wen T, Mingler MK, Blanchard C, Wahl B, Pabst O, Rothenberg ME. The pan-B cell marker CD22 is expressed on gastrointestinal eosinophils and negatively regulates tissue eosinophilia. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1075–82. Epub 2011/12/23. jimmunol.1102222 [pii] doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102222 22190185; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3262961.
9. Nitschke L, Carsetti R, Ocker B, Kohler G, Lamers MC. CD22 is a negative regulator of B-cell receptor signalling. Curr Biol. 1997;7(2):133–43. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00057-1 9016707
10. O'Keefe TL, Williams GT, Davies SL, Neuberger MS. Hyperresponsive B cells in CD22-deficient mice. Science. 1996;274(5288):798–801. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.798 8864124
11. Otipoby KL, Andersson KB, Draves KE, Klaus SJ, Farr AG, Kerner JD, et al. CD22 regulates thymus-independent responses and the lifespan of B cells. Nature. 1996;384(6610):634–7. doi: 10.1038/384634a0 8967951
12. Sato S, Miller AS, Inaoki M, Bock CB, Jansen PJ, Tang ML, et al. CD22 is both a positive and negative regulator of B lymphocyte antigen receptor signal transduction: altered signaling in CD22-deficient mice. Immunity. 1996;5(6):551–62. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80270-8 8986715
13. Weber GF, Chousterman BG, Hilgendorf I, Robbins CS, Theurl I, Gerhardt LM, et al. Pleural innate response activator B cells protect against pneumonia via a GM-CSF-IgM axis. J Exp Med. 2014;211(6):1243–56. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131471 24821911; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4042649.
14. Becher B, Tugues S, Greter M. GM-CSF: From Growth Factor to Central Mediator of Tissue Inflammation. Immunity. 2016;45(5):963–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.026 27851925.
15. Baumgarth N. The double life of a B-1 cell: self-reactivity selects for protective effector functions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(1):34–46. Epub 2010/12/15. nri2901 [pii] doi: 10.1038/nri2901 21151033.
16. Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity. 2005;23(1):7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.011 16039575.
17. Haas KM, Johnson KL, Phipps JP, Do C. CD22 Promotes B-1b Cell Responses to T Cell-Independent Type 2 Antigens. J Immunol. 2018;200(5):1671–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701578 29374074; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5821584.
18. Samardzic T, Marinkovic D, Danzer CP, Gerlach J, Nitschke L, Wirth T. Reduction of marginal zone B cells in CD22-deficient mice. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32(2):561–7. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200202)32:2<561::AID-IMMU561>3.0.CO;2-H 11828373
19. Jellusova J, Wellmann U, Amann K, Winkler TH, Nitschke L. CD22 x Siglec-G double-deficient mice have massively increased B1 cell numbers and develop systemic autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2010;184(7):3618–27. Epub 2010/03/05. jimmunol.0902711 [pii] doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902711 20200274.
20. O'Keefe TL, Williams GT, Batista FD, Neuberger MS. Deficiency in CD22, a B cell-specific inhibitory receptor, is sufficient to predispose to development of high affinity autoantibodies. J Exp Med. 1999;189(8):1307–13. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.8.1307 10209047
21. Gjertsson I, Nitschke L, Tarkowski A. The role of B cell CD22 expression in Staphylococcus aureus arthritis and sepsis. Microbes Infect. 2004;6(4):377–82. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.12.013 15050965.
22. Ma DY, Suthar MS, Kasahara S, Gale M Jr., Clark EA. CD22 is required for protection against West Nile virus Infection. J Virol. 2013;87(6):3361–75. Epub 2013/01/11. JVI.02368-12 [pii] doi: 10.1128/JVI.02368-12 23302871; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3592166.
23. Müller J, Obermeier I, Wohner M, Brandl C, Mrotzek S, Angermuller S, et al. CD22 ligand-binding and signaling domains reciprocally regulate B-cell Ca2+ signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(30):12402–7. Epub 2013/07/10. 1304888110 [pii] doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304888110 23836650; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3725054.
24. Chapman SJ, Khor CC, Vannberg FO, Rautanen A, Segal S, Moore CE, et al. NFKBIZ polymorphisms and susceptibility to pneumococcal disease in European and African populations. Genes Immun. 2010;11(4):319–25. doi: 10.1038/gene.2009.76 19798075; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3051152.
25. Ferwerda B, Valls Seron M, Jongejan A, Zwinderman AH, Geldhoff M, van der Ende A, et al. Variation of 46 Innate Immune Genes Evaluated for their Contribution in Pneumococcal Meningitis Susceptibility and Outcome. EBioMedicine. 2016;10:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.011 27432718; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5006661.
26. Lingappa JR, Dumitrescu L, Zimmer SM, Lynfield R, McNicholl JM, Messonnier NE, et al. Identifying host genetic risk factors in the context of public health surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023413 21858107; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3156135.
27. Lander ES, Schork NJ. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science. 1994;265(5181):2037–48. doi: 10.1126/science.8091226 8091226.
28. Kadioglu A, Gingles NA, Grattan K, Kerr A, Mitchell TJ, Andrew PW. Host cellular immune response to pneumococcal lung infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2000;68(2):492–501. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.2.492-501.2000 10639409; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC97168.
29. Morton DB, Griffiths PH. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec. 1985;116(16):431–6. doi: 10.1136/vr.116.16.431 3923690.
30. Rauch PJ, Chudnovskiy A, Robbins CS, Weber GF, Etzrodt M, Hilgendorf I, et al. Innate response activator B cells protect against microbial sepsis. Science. 2012;335(6068):597–601. doi: 10.1126/science.1215173 22245738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3279743.
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2020 Číslo 4
- Může hubnutí souviset s vyšším rizikem nádorových onemocnění?
- Raději si zajděte na oční! Jak souvisí citlivost zraku s rozvojem demence?
- Co způsobuje pooperační infekce? Na vině může být i naše vlastní mikrobiota
- Čeká nás průlom v diagnostice karcinomu pankreatu?
- Polibek, který mi „vzal nohy“ aneb vzácný výskyt EBV u 70leté ženy – kazuistika
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Battling brain-eating amoeba: Enigmas surrounding immunity to Naegleria fowleri
- Genetic interaction analysis comes to the diploid human pathogen Candida albicans
- Human cytomegalovirus IE2 drives transcription initiation from a select subset of late infection viral promoters by host RNA polymerase II
- Drosophila as a model for the gut microbiome