Retransfusion system with integrated double filtration – parameters of product quality
Authors:
Š. Maříková 1; L. Řehořová 1,5; R. Mizera 2; L. Walterová 3; I. Ouhrabková 4; R. Procházková 1,5
Published in:
Transfuze Hematol. dnes,20, 2014, No. 4, p. 117-124.
Category:
Comprehensive Reports, Original Papers, Case Reports
Overview
Introduction.
Retransfusion systems enable the collection of blood from the surgical field via drains, channelling it back to the patients’ vein. The aim of the study was to determine the qualitative and quantitative changes in biological parameters of blood collected through a retransfusion system and evaluation of patient safety.
Materials and Methods.
We measured quality parameters, markers of red cell storage lesion and coagulation tests in retransfusion products. Quality parameters and markers of cell lesion were compared with standard red blood components (RBCs). We used the Shapiro-Wilk test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and parametric two-tailed t-test for statistical evaluation. Statistical significance was assessed at the level of p < 0.05.
Results.
Values of haemoglobin and haematocrit were significantly lower when compared with RBCs (Hb 93 ± 24 g/l vs. 197 ± 10 g/l; Ht 0.28 ± 0.07 vs. 0.59 ± 0.03, p < 0.001). Retransfusion products showed a significantly higher content of leukocytes (11.9 ± 4.0 × 109/l vs. 2.2 ± 1.3 × 109/l; p < 0.001) and a higher level of plasma haemoglobin (0.42% ± 0.14% vs. 0.34% ± 0.17%, p < 0.05) when compared with standard RBCs. The level of potassium, LDH and lactate in retransfusion products was significantly higher than in RBCs at the beginning of storage (p < 0.001), but significantly lower than in RBCs at the end of storage. Retransfusion products showed significantly lower values of pH compared with RBCs at the beginning of storage (p < 0.001) and significantly higher pH when compared with RBCs at the end of storage (p < 0.001). The value of triglycerides in the product was higher (2.21 ± 0.85 mmol/l). The values of PT, APTT, TT and fibrinogen were not measurable. The level of D-dimers was significantly higher (> 10 mg/l FEU) and AT III levels lower (42.6 ± 7.4%). Bacterial contamination was not found in any of the tested products.
Conclusion.
Compared to RBCs, the retransfusion product has approximately half of the haemoglobin content, so it is not entirely equivalent to standard red cell concentrates. The amount of haemolysis in the retransfusion product meets the quality parameters of standard RBCs. Increased levels of potassium and LDH are related to the destruction of red blood cells. Coagulation parameter results are irrelevant as to the consumption of coagulation proteins during preparation of the final product. The thrombogenicity of retransfusion products is not entirely clear and deserves further research. It appears that the retransfusion product is relatively safe for patients based on the results of this research.
Key words:
retransfusion, retransfusion system, red cells buffy coat removed, in additive solution, red cells, apheresis
Sources
1. Habler O. Indication for transfusion in orthopedic surgery. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine 2006; 8: 17-28.
2. Rao VK, Dyga R, Bartels Ch, Waters JH. A cost study of postoperative cell salvage in the setting of elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Transfusion 2012; 52: 1750-1760.
3. Moonen AFCM, Knoors NT, Van Os JJ, Verburg AD, Pilot P. Retransfusion of filtered shed blood in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized clinical trial. Transfusion 2007; 47: 379-384.
4. Rosencher N, Kerkkamp HEM, Macheras G, et al. Ortopedic surgery transfusion hemoglobin european overview (OSTHEO) study: blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe. Transfusion 2003; 43: 459-469.
5. Handel M, Winkler J, Hörnlein RF, Northoff H, Heeg P, Sell S. Influence of acid-citrate-dextrose anticoagulant on blood quality in retransfision systems after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Ortop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 269-273.
6. Muñoz M, Slappendel R, Thomas D. Laboratory characteristics and clinical utility of post-operative cell salvage: washed or unwashed blood transfusion. Blood Transfusion 2011; 9: 248-61.
7. Jones HW, Savage L, White C, et al. Postoperative autologous blood salvage drains – Are they useful in primary uncemented hip and knee arthroplasty? A prospective study of 186 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 2004; 70: 466-473.
8. Muñoz M, Ariza D, Campos A, Martín-Mantañez E, Pavía J. The cost of post-operative shed blood salvage after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 1 093 consecutive procedures. Blood Transfusion 2013; 11: 260-271.
9. Yazer MH, Waters JH, Elkin KR, Rohrbaugh ME, Kameneva MV. A comparison of hemolysis and red cell mechanical fragility in blood collected with different cell salvage suction devices. Transfusion 2008; 48: 1188-1191.
10. Muñoz M, García-Vallejo JJ, Ruiz MD, Romero R, Olalla E, Sebastián C. Transfusion of post-operative shed blood: laboratory characteristics and clinical utility. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 (Suppl. 1): S107-S113.
11. Handel M, Winkler J, Hörnlein RF, Northoff H, Heeg P, Sell S. Time-related changes of collected shed blood in autologous retransfusion after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Ortop Trauma Surg 2001; 121: 557-560.
12. Liumbruno GM, Waters JH. Unwashed shed blood: should we transfuse it? Blood Transfusion 2011; 9: 241-245.
13. Hansen E, Pawlik M. Reason against the retransfusion of unwashed wound blood. Transfusion 2004; 44: 45S-53S.
14. Waters JH. Indication and contraindications of cell salvage. Transfusion 2004; 44: 40S-44S.
15. Muñoz M, Cobos A, Compos A, Ariza D, Muñoz E, Gómez A. Impact of postoperative shed blood transfusion, with or without leucotyte reduction, on acute-phase response to surgery for total knee replacement. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1182-1190.
16. Muñoz M, Campos A, Muñoz E, et al. Red cell salvage in ortopedic surgery. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine 2006; 8: 41-51.
17. Sinardi D, Marino A, Chillemi S, Irrera M, Labruto G, Mondello E. Composition of the blood sampled from surgical drainage after join arthroplasty: quality of return. Transfusion 2000; 45: 202-207.
18. Guan Z, Jiang J, Wang N. Research on coagulation of unwashed shed blood after total knee replacement in chinese patients. Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes and Biotechnology 2008; 36: 51-62.
19. Muñoz M, García-Erce JA, Cuenca J, Solano VM. Course of D-dimer concentrations after total knee replacement surgery: effect of allogenic and unwashed drainage blood transfusion. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine 2006; 8: 135-141.
20. Procházková R, Andrýs C, Krejsek J, Bláha M. Erytrocyty z aferézy – zhodnocení markerů apoptózy u přípravků ze dvou separátorů. Transfuze a hematologie dnes, 14, 2008; 4: 159-165.
21. Procházková R. Multikomponentní aferetické odběry krve. Brno, Tribun EU 2009; 88 s.
22. Ley JT, Yazer MH, Waters JH. Hemolysis and red blood cell mechanical fragility in shed blood after total knee arthroplasty. Transfusion 2012; 52: 34-38.
23. Stachura A, Król R, Poplawski T, et al. Transfusion of intra-operative autologous whole blood: influence on complement activation and interleukin formation.Vox Sanq 2011; 100: 239-246.
Labels
Haematology Internal medicine Clinical oncologyArticle was published in
Transfusion and Haematology Today
2014 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- The significance of heavy/light chain immunoglobulin pairs (Hevylite™) in multiple myeloma
- Activity of Blood Transfusion Service in the Czech Republic 1989–2013
- Retransfusion system with integrated double filtration – parameters of product quality
- Pharmacokinetics as a tool for optimising the treatment of patients with haemophilia