#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#
CS
proLékaře.cz / Journals / Perspectives in Surgery / 2020 - 7

Endovenous laser ablation of saphenous vein – mid-term results confirm permanent closure and possibility to treat more lesions in one procedure

Czech version

Authors: T. Honěk;  J. Honěk;  V. Horváth;  M. Šlais;  M. Vítovec;  O. Stehno;  P. Šedivý;  T. Kneifl;  V. Fabián;  P. Šebesta
Authors‘ workplace: Elektrotechnická fakulta, ČVUT, Praha ;  Avicena-chirurgie s. r. o., Nemocnice Malvazinky, Praha
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2020, roč. 99, č. 7, s. 299-303.
Category: Original articles
doi: https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2020.99.7.299–303

Overview

Introduction: Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) is a common alternative to surgical treatment of varicose veins. The aim of our study was to demonstrate that laser occlusion is durable, that we can treat all patients in a one day setting, even with veins >10mm in diameter, and that multiple EVLAs can be done at the same time.

Methods: In the period from 1/2017 to 12/2019 EVLA was performed in a total of 1551 consecutive patients with varicose veins and ultrasonographically documented venous reflux. The mid-term results were evaluated in a group of patients operated from 1/2017 to 6/2017 (316 pts.). We compared a risk group that consisted of patients with veins >10mm in diameter (40 pts.) with a control group (the remaining 276 pts.). Patients with veins >10mm are traditionally considered as candidates for conventional surgery.

Results: The catheter-based method enabled us to perform more ablations in one procedure. In 2019 we performed 1.44 EVLA procedures per patient. There was only one postoperative follow-up visit, indicating an uncomplicated postoperative course, in 87.5% of patients of the risk group. In the control group 100% of patients had only one follow-up visit including ultrasound examination, showing an uncomplicated postoperative course (p<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of complications. Ultrasonographic follow-up was performed in the risk group. Veins larger in diameter revealed complete disintegration early, but at the end of the follow-up period (mean 33±6 months) they disappeared completely.  

Conclusion: The study showed good mid-term results of EVLA of the saphenous vein in the outpatient setting and the feasibility of performing multiple ablations in a non-selected group of patients using local anaesthesia. Laser destruction of the vein was shown to be permanent. Perfect familiarity with the diagnostic procedure using ultrasonography and early patient follow-up are required to achieve reproducibility.

Keywords:

endovenous laser ablation – chronic venous insufficiency – mid-term results

Sources
  1. Piazza G. Varicose veins. Circulation 2014;130:582−587. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008331.
  2. Evans CJ, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, et al. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:149−153.
  3. Tassie E, Scotland G, Brittenden J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation or surgery as treatment for primary varicose veins from the randomized CLASS trial. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1532−1540. doi:10.1002/bjs.9595.
  4. Critchley G, Handa A, Maw A, et al. Complications of varicose vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:105−110.
  5. Siribumrungwong B, Noorit P, Wilasrusmee C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:214−223. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.017.
  6. Miller GV, Lewis WG, Sainsbury JR, et al. Morbidity of varicose vein surgery: auditing the benefit of changing clinical practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78,345−349.
  7. Bootun R, Lane TR, Davies AH. A comparison of thermal and non-thermal ablation. Reviews in Vascular Medicine 2016;4:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.rvm.2016.02.001.
  8. Elias S. Minimally invasive vein surgery: latest options for vein disease. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;77:270−278. doi:10.1002/msj.20186.
  9. Brittenden J, Cotton SC, Elders A, et al. A randomized trial comparing treatments for varicose veins. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1218−1227. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1400781.
  10. Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:985−994. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071.
  11. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:630e5. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.040.
  12. Darwood RJ, Theivacumar N, Dellagrammaticas D, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2008;95:294e−301. doi:10.1002/bjs.6101.
  13. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FAK, et al. Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98:501−e10. doi:10.1002/bjs.7394.
  14. Christenson JT, Gueddi S, Gemayel G, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1234−e41. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.104.
  15. Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1079−1087. doi:10.1002/bjs.7555.
  16. Biemans AA, Kockaert M, Akkersdijk GP, et al. Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:727−734. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.074.
  17. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FA, et al. Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1117−1123. doi:10.1002/bjs.7615.
  18. Carroll C, Hummel S, Leaviss J, et al. Cli­nical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2013;17:1−141. doi:10.3310/hta17480.
  19. Gloviczki P, Gloviczki ML. Guidelines for the management of varicose veins. Phlebology 2012;27:2−9. doi:10.1258/phleb.2012.012s28.
  20. Galanopoulos G, Lambidis C. Minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Int J Surg. 2012;12:134−139. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.013.
  21. van den Bos RR, Kockaert MA, Neumann HA, et al. Technical review of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:88−95.
  22. Proebstle TM, Moehler T, Herdemann S. Reduced recanalization rates of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment with increased energy dosing: definition of a threshold for the endovenous fluence equivalent. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:834−839.
  23. Theivacumar NS, Dellagrammaticas D, Beale RJ, et al. Factors influencing the effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:119−123.
  24. Puggioni A, Kalra M, Carmo M, et al. Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:488−493.
  25. Chaar CI, Hirsch SA, Cwenar MT, et al. Expanding the role of endovenous laser therapy: results in large diameter saphenous, small saphenous, and anterior accessory veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:656−661. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2011.02.031.
  26. Marsh P, Price BA, Holdstock J, et al. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous thermoablation techniques: Rates of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and classical DVT after radiofrequency and endovenous laser ablation in a single centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:521−527. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.011.
  27. Honěk T, Horváth M, Horváth V, et al. Catheter-based endovenous laser ablation of saphenous veins in the treatment of symptomatic venous reflux: Early results. Cor Vasa 2017;59:525−529. doi:10.1016/j.crvasa.2016.11.002.
  28. Honěk T, Horváth M, Horváth V, et al. Catheter laser ablation of superficial veins of the lower extremities in the symptomatic treatment of venous reflux − comparison of the immediate results of two types of laser generators. Rozhl Chir. 2019;98:248−251.
Labels
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgery
Nosocomial pneumonias
Technický vývoj robotické chirurgie
Implanted vagus nerve stimulation in 126 patients: surgical technique and complications
Clear cell renal carcinoma metastases to the pancreas
Surgical complications of decompressive craniectomy in patients with head injury
Morgagni hernia – case reports
Primary perineal hernia: a case report
Article was published in

Perspectives in Surgery

Issue 7
2020 Issue 7
Most read in this issue
Topics Journals
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#