Rectal cancer within 10 cm.
Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision

Czech version

Authors: T. Dušek; A. Ferko ¹; J. Örhalmi ¹; M. Chobola ¹; D. H. Nikolov ¹; E. Hovorková ²; Eva Čermáková ^{2 3}
Authors‘ workplace: Chirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové a Lékařské Fakulty UK v Hradci Králové přednosta: Prof. MUDr. A. Ferko, CSc. ¹; Oddělení výpočetní techniky, Lékařská Fakulta UK v Hradci Králové vedoucí: Ing. J. Špulák ²; Fingerlandův ústav patologie Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové a Lékařské Fakulty UK v Hradci Králové přednosta: Prof. MUDr. A. Ryška, Ph. D. ²
Published in: Rozhl. Chir., 2013, roč. 92, č. 6, s. 312-319.
Category: Original articles

Podpořeno MZ ČR – RVO (FNHK, 00179906)

Overview

Introduction:
The issue of achieving radical circumferential margin in laparoscopic rectal surgery has not yet been satisfactorily clarified. In this paper we have focused on circumferential margin assessment and the quality of the mesorectal excision, comparing laparoscopic and open resection for cancer of the middle and lower rectum.

Material and Methods:
The results of surgical procedures for middle and low rectal cancer were analysed. All the interventions were performed at the Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital in Hradec Kralove, during the period from January 2011 to December 2012. The data were prospectively collected and entered in the Rectal Cancer Registry. Age, gender, BMI, tumour localisation and topography, the clinical stage, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and response to it, the type of surgery, distal and circumferential margin characteristics, mesorectal excision quality, pT and pN were compared for laparoscopic and open surgery.

Results:
A total of 161 patients were operated on for rectal cancer during the abovementioned period. 94 patients were included in the trial following selection. Laparoscopy was used in 40 patients and open surgery in 54 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 33 (82.5%) low anterior resections (including four intersphincteric resections), 6 (15%) abdominoperineal amputations and 1 (2.5%) Hartmann’s procedure. Open surgery was used for 26 (48.1%) low anterior resections, 21 (38.9%) APR and 7 (13%) Hartmann’s procedures.

Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 45% of the laparoscopic resections vs. 46.3% of open resections. Nearly complete excision was performed in 22.5% and 11.1%, respectively. Finally, incomplete excision was described in 30% vs. 38.9%. No available data for TME was detected in three patients. The differences in TME were not statistically significant.

Positive circumferential margin was found in 5 (12.5%) patients in the laparoscopy group; on the contrary, in the group undergoing open surgery, pCRO+ was found in 15 (27.8%) patients. Here, too, the results were not statistically significant. When patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy were excluded, the relationship between ypCRM in the laparoscopy and open surgery group was on the border of statistical significance (Fischer=0.0556).

Conclusion:
As has been shown in our trial, the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approach in rectal cancer treatment are very similar. Particularly, mesorectal excision quality and negative CRM results have proven that the laparoscopic technique is safe and comparable to open surgery in rectal cancer treatment.

Key words:
total mesorectal excision – circumferential resection margin – rectal cancer – colorectal cancer

Sources

1. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, OęCallaghan C, Myint AS, Bessel E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D. Effect of the plane of srugery achieved on local recirrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO 16randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009; 373:821–28.

2. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:982–89.

3. Ströhlein MA, Grützner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. Open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:385–91.

4. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, Jouret-Mourin A, Sempoux C, Jehaes C, Van Eycken E. Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010;252:982–8.

5. Kellokumpu IH, Kairaluoma MI, Nuorva KP, Kautiainen HJ, Jantunen IT. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:854–63.

6. Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, Takemura M, Fujiwara Y. Laparoscopic rectal surgery for middle and lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2010;24:449–57.

7. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW,Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:637–45.

8. Lee SD, Park SC, Park JW, Kim DY, Choi HS, Oh JH. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Stage I Rectal Cancer: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes. World J Surg 2013;37:646–51.

9. D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2013;1–9. Published online.

10. Örhalmi J, Klos D, Jackanin S, Holéczy P. Intersfinkterické resekce rekta. Rozhl Chir 2012;91:101–104.

11. Gonzalez QH, Rodriguez-Zentner HA, Moreno-Berber JM, Vergara-Fernandez O, Tapia-Cid de Leon H, Jonguitud LA, Ramos R, Moreno-Lopez JA. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a nonrandomized comparative prospective trial in a tertiary center in Mexico City. Am Surg 2009;75:33–38.

12. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1729–34.

13. Hotta T, Yamaue, H. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000–2009. Surg Today 2011; 41:1583–91.

14. Herzog T, Belyaev O, Chromik AM, Weyhe D, Mueller CA, Munding J, Tannapfel, A, Uhl W, and Seelig MH. TME quality in rectal cancer surgery. Eur J Med Res 2010;15:292–6.

15. Krane MK, Fichera A. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where do we stand? World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:6747–55.

16. van der Pas MHGM, Haglind E, CVuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short–term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;1–9. Published online.

17. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim MJ, Kim H, Shinn RK. Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:721–8.

18. Bosch SL, Nagtegaal ID. The Importance of the Pathologist’s Role in Assessment of the Quality of the Mesorectum. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 2012;8:90–98.

19. Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:415–421.

20. Laurent C,Leblanc F, Wutrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:54–61.

21. Schneider PM, Vallbohmer D, Ploenes Y, Lurje G, Metzger R, Ling,FC, Brabender J, Drebber U, Hoelscher AH. Evaluation of quality indicators following implementation of total mesorectal excision in primarily resected rectal cancer changed future management. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:903–9.

22. Kim JC, Yu CS, Lim SB, Kim CW, Kim JH, Kim TW. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;1–9. Published online.

23. Trakarnsanga A, Gonen M, Shia J, Goodman KA, Nash GM, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Weiser MR. What is the Significance of the Circumferential Margin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 2013;1–7. Published online.

24. Asoglu O, Balik, E, Kunduz E, Yamaner S, Akyuz A, Gulluoglu M, Kapran Y, Bugra D. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: outcomes in 513 patients. World J Surg 2013;37:883–9.